1
|
Lynch AR, Bradford S, Zhou AS, Oxendine K, Henderson L, Horner VL, Weaver BA, Burkard ME. A survey of chromosomal instability measures across mechanistic models. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2024; 121:e2309621121. [PMID: 38588415 PMCID: PMC11032477 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2309621121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Chromosomal instability (CIN) is the persistent reshuffling of cancer karyotypes via chromosome mis-segregation during cell division. In cancer, CIN exists at varying levels that have differential effects on tumor progression. However, mis-segregation rates remain challenging to assess in human cancer despite an array of available measures. We evaluated measures of CIN by comparing quantitative methods using specific, inducible phenotypic CIN models of chromosome bridges, pseudobipolar spindles, multipolar spindles, and polar chromosomes. For each, we measured CIN fixed and timelapse fluorescence microscopy, chromosome spreads, six-centromere FISH, bulk transcriptomics, and single-cell DNA sequencing (scDNAseq). As expected, microscopy of tumor cells in live and fixed samples significantly correlated (R = 0.72; P < 0.001) and sensitively detect CIN. Cytogenetics approaches include chromosome spreads and 6-centromere FISH, which also significantly correlate (R = 0.76; P < 0.001) but had limited sensitivity for lower rates of CIN. Bulk genomic DNA signatures and bulk transcriptomic scores, CIN70 and HET70, did not detect CIN. By contrast, scDNAseq detects CIN with high sensitivity, and significantly correlates with imaging methods (R = 0.82; P < 0.001). In summary, single-cell methods such as imaging, cytogenetics, and scDNAseq can measure CIN, with the latter being the most comprehensive method accessible to clinical samples. To facilitate the comparison of CIN rates between phenotypes and methods, we propose a standardized unit of CIN: Mis-segregations per Diploid Division. This systematic analysis of common CIN measures highlights the superiority of single-cell methods and provides guidance for measuring CIN in the clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew R. Lynch
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI53705
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI53705
| | - Shermineh Bradford
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI53705
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI53705
| | - Amber S. Zhou
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI53705
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI53705
| | - Kim Oxendine
- Cytogenetic and Molecular Genetic Services Laboratory, Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI53706
| | - Les Henderson
- Cytogenetic and Molecular Genetic Services Laboratory, Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI53706
| | - Vanessa L. Horner
- Cytogenetic and Molecular Genetic Services Laboratory, Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI53706
| | - Beth A. Weaver
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI53705
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI53705
- Department of Cell and Regenerative Biology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI53705
| | - Mark E. Burkard
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI53705
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI53705
- Division of Hematology Oncology and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI53705
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhou AS, Tucker JB, Scribano CM, Lynch AR, Carlsen CL, Pop-Vicas ST, Pattaswamy SM, Burkard ME, Weaver BA. Diverse microtubule-targeted anticancer agents kill cells by inducing chromosome missegregation on multipolar spindles. PLoS Biol 2023; 21:e3002339. [PMID: 37883329 PMCID: PMC10602348 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Microtubule-targeted agents are commonly used for cancer treatment, though many patients do not benefit. Microtubule-targeted drugs were assumed to elicit anticancer activity via mitotic arrest because they cause cell death following mitotic arrest in cell culture. However, we recently demonstrated that intratumoral paclitaxel concentrations are insufficient to induce mitotic arrest and rather induce chromosomal instability (CIN) via multipolar mitotic spindles. Here, we show in metastatic breast cancer and relevant human cellular models that this mechanism is conserved among clinically useful microtubule poisons. While multipolar divisions typically produce inviable progeny, multipolar spindles can be focused into near-normal bipolar spindles at any stage of mitosis. Using a novel method to quantify the rate of CIN, we demonstrate that cell death positively correlates with net loss of DNA. Spindle focusing decreases CIN and causes resistance to diverse microtubule poisons, which can be counteracted by addition of a drug that increases CIN without affecting spindle polarity. These results demonstrate conserved mechanisms of action and resistance for diverse microtubule-targeted agents. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03393741.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amber S. Zhou
- Molecular and Cellular Pharmacology Graduate Training Program, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - John B. Tucker
- Cancer Biology Graduate Training Program, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Christina M. Scribano
- Molecular and Cellular Pharmacology Graduate Training Program, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Andrew R. Lynch
- Cellular and Molecular Pathology Graduate Training Program, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Caleb L. Carlsen
- Cellular and Molecular Biology Graduate Training Program, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Sophia T. Pop-Vicas
- Department of Cell and Regenerative Biology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Srishrika M. Pattaswamy
- Department of Cell and Regenerative Biology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Mark E. Burkard
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
- Department of Oncology/McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Beth A. Weaver
- Department of Cell and Regenerative Biology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
- Department of Oncology/McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lynch AR, Bradford S, Zhou AS, Oxendine K, Henderson L, Horner VL, Weaver BA, Burkard ME. A survey of CIN measures across mechanistic models. bioRxiv 2023:2023.06.15.544840. [PMID: 37398147 PMCID: PMC10312700 DOI: 10.1101/2023.06.15.544840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
Chromosomal instability (CIN) is the persistent reshuffling of cancer karyotypes via chromosome mis-segregation during cell division. In cancer, CIN exists at varying levels that have differential effects on tumor progression. However, mis-segregation rates remain challenging to assess in human cancer despite an array of available measures. We evaluated measures of CIN by comparing quantitative methods using specific, inducible phenotypic CIN models of chromosome bridges, pseudobipolar spindles, multipolar spindles, and polar chromosomes. For each, we measured CIN fixed and timelapse fluorescence microscopy, chromosome spreads, 6-centromere FISH, bulk transcriptomics, and single cell DNA sequencing (scDNAseq). As expected, microscopy of tumor cells in live and fixed samples correlated well (R=0.77; p<0.01) and sensitively detect CIN. Cytogenetics approaches include chromosome spreads and 6-centromere FISH, which also correlate well (R=0.77; p<0.01) but had limited sensitivity for lower rates of CIN. Bulk genomic DNA signatures and bulk transcriptomic scores, CIN70 and HET70, did not detect CIN. By contrast, single-cell DNA sequencing (scDNAseq) detects CIN with high sensitivity, and correlates very well with imaging methods (R=0.83; p<0.01). In summary, single-cell methods such as imaging, cytogenetics, and scDNAseq can measure CIN, with the latter being the most comprehensive method accessible to clinical samples. To facilitate comparison of CIN rates between phenotypes and methods, we propose a standardized unit of CIN: Mis-segregations per Diploid Division (MDD). This systematic analysis of common CIN measures highlights the superiority of single-cell methods and provides guidance for measuring CIN in the clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew R. Lynch
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI, USA
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Shermineh Bradford
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI, USA
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Amber S. Zhou
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI, USA
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Kim Oxendine
- Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Les Henderson
- Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Vanessa L. Horner
- Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Beth A. Weaver
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI, USA
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI, USA
- Department of Cell and Regenerative Biology, University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Mark E. Burkard
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI, USA
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI, USA
- Division of Hematology Oncology and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lynch AR, Arp NL, Zhou AS, Weaver BA, Burkard ME. Quantifying chromosomal instability from intratumoral karyotype diversity using agent-based modeling and Bayesian inference. eLife 2022; 11:e69799. [PMID: 35380536 PMCID: PMC9054132 DOI: 10.7554/elife.69799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Chromosomal instability (CIN)-persistent chromosome gain or loss through abnormal mitotic segregation-is a hallmark of cancer that drives aneuploidy. Intrinsic chromosome mis-segregation rate, a measure of CIN, can inform prognosis and is a promising biomarker for response to anti-microtubule agents. However, existing methodologies to measure this rate are labor intensive, indirect, and confounded by selection against aneuploid cells, which reduces observable diversity. We developed a framework to measure CIN, accounting for karyotype selection, using simulations with various levels of CIN and models of selection. To identify the model parameters that best fit karyotype data from single-cell sequencing, we used approximate Bayesian computation to infer mis-segregation rates and karyotype selection. Experimental validation confirmed the extensive chromosome mis-segregation rates caused by the chemotherapy paclitaxel (18.5 ± 0.5/division). Extending this approach to clinical samples revealed that inferred rates fell within direct observations of cancer cell lines. This work provides the necessary framework to quantify CIN in human tumors and develop it as a predictive biomarker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew R Lynch
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUnited States
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUnited States
| | - Nicholas L Arp
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUnited States
| | - Amber S Zhou
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUnited States
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUnited States
| | - Beth A Weaver
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUnited States
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUnited States
- Department of Cell and Regenerative Biology, University of WisconsinMadisonUnited States
| | - Mark E Burkard
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUnited States
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUnited States
- Division of Hematology Medical Oncology and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine University of WisconsinMadisonUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Thirty patients were managed with the use of a simple means of external fixation. Ten of these patients had multiple injuries. In 18 the fractures were open. Five cases had loss of bone length and infected wounds when first seen and were treated with the aid of microvascular surgical procedures. Eight cases required skin grafting. One case required a vein graft to the popliteal artery. The method described is simple to use. It requires little previous experience and is cost effective. We recommend its use in the initial treatment of grade 2 and 3 open fractures. It may also be used on closed unstable fractures, and will maintain limb length in severe injuries with loss of bone substance while further treatment is considered or performed.
Collapse
|