1
|
Chappaz S, McArthur K, Kealy L, Law CW, Tailler M, Lane RM, Lieschke A, Ritchie ME, Good-Jacobson KL, Strasser A, Kile BT. Homeostatic apoptosis prevents competition-induced atrophy in follicular B cells. Cell Rep 2021; 36:109430. [PMID: 34289356 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Revised: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
While the intrinsic apoptosis pathway is thought to play a central role in shaping the B cell lineage, its precise role in mature B cell homeostasis remains elusive. Using mice in which mature B cells are unable to undergo apoptotic cell death, we show that apoptosis constrains follicular B (FoB) cell lifespan but plays no role in marginal zone B (MZB) cell homeostasis. In these mice, FoB cells accumulate abnormally. This intensifies intercellular competition for BAFF, resulting in a contraction of the MZB cell compartment, and reducing the growth, trafficking, and fitness of FoB cells. Diminished BAFF signaling dampens the non-canonical NF-κB pathway, undermining FoB cell growth despite the concurrent triggering of a protective p53 response. Thus, MZB and FoB cells exhibit a differential requirement for the intrinsic apoptosis pathway. Homeostatic apoptosis constrains the size of the FoB cell compartment, thereby preventing competition-induced FoB cell atrophy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stéphane Chappaz
- Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, 3800 VIC, Australia; ACRF Chemical Biology Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, 3052 VIC, Australia; Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010 VIC, Australia.
| | - Kate McArthur
- ACRF Chemical Biology Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, 3052 VIC, Australia; Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, 3800 VIC, Australia; Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010 VIC, Australia
| | - Liam Kealy
- Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, 3800 VIC, Australia; Infection and Immunity Program, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, 3800 VIC, Australia
| | - Charity W Law
- Epigenetics and Development Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, 3052 VIC, Australia; Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010 VIC, Australia
| | - Maximilien Tailler
- Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, 3800 VIC, Australia
| | - Rachael M Lane
- Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, 3800 VIC, Australia
| | | | - Matthew E Ritchie
- Epigenetics and Development Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, 3052 VIC, Australia; Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010 VIC, Australia
| | - Kim L Good-Jacobson
- Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, 3800 VIC, Australia; Infection and Immunity Program, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, 3800 VIC, Australia
| | - Andreas Strasser
- Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010 VIC, Australia; Blood Cells and Blood Cancer Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, 3052 VIC, Australia
| | - Benjamin T Kile
- Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, 3800 VIC, Australia; ACRF Chemical Biology Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, 3052 VIC, Australia; Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010 VIC, Australia; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5005 SA, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lieschke A, Dahlstrom JE, Kent AL, Sethna F. Uncertainty over implications of placental histopathological findings: A survey of Australian and New Zealand neonatologists. J Paediatr Child Health 2020; 56:259-264. [PMID: 31576644 DOI: 10.1111/jpc.14576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2019] [Revised: 06/10/2019] [Accepted: 07/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
AIM Placental examination is known to provide useful information following an adverse pregnancy outcome. Despite existing literature and guidelines for placental examination; current workplace practices, attitudes towards the value of placental examination and the knowledge of perinatal clinicians regarding placental lesions of significance are unknown. The aim of the study is to explore the current knowledge of neonatologists and maternal fetal medicine specialists on placental histopathological findings and clinical management based on placental pathology. METHODS A total of 280 specialists working in perinatal centres across Australia and New Zealand were invited to complete a 20-question online multiple-choice-based survey addressing work-place placental examination practices, and participant beliefs regarding the utility of histopathological findings and follow-up practices. RESULTS A total of 74 neonatologists participated in the survey (28.2% response rate). Maternal fetal medicine specialists were excluded due to low response rate (2%). A total of 100% of respondents believed placental examination provided useful information regarding recent pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. They reported being aware of the presence of protocols for macroscopic examination of, and indications for histopathological examination of the placenta (55.4 and 54.1%, respectively). Nine neonatologists reported a system for actioning abnormal placental reports. There was no consensus amongst neonatologists as to which specific placental lesions held implications for future pregnancy or neonatal outcomes, and how these findings should be followed. CONCLUSIONS Our findings show placental examination is valued amongst neonatologists in Australia and New Zealand, but highlights the need for better education regarding the significance and utility of the results and what would be best practice for following up reports.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Lieschke
- College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University Medical School, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Jane E Dahlstrom
- College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University Medical School, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.,Department of Anatomical Pathology, Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Alison L Kent
- College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University Medical School, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.,Division of Neonatology, University of Rochester, Golisano Children's Hospital at URMC, Rochester, New York, United States
| | - Farah Sethna
- College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University Medical School, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Centenary Hospital for Women and Children, Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kirkegaard JA, Sprague SJ, Dove H, Kelman WM, Marcroft SJ, Lieschke A, Howe GN, Graham JM. Dual-purpose canola—a new opportunity in mixed farming systems. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2008. [DOI: 10.1071/ar07285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
The term dual-purpose canola describes the use of a canola crop for forage before seed production. It could potentially provide a profitable and flexible break-crop option for mixed farms, but there have been no studies to test the concept in Australia. We investigated the feasibility of using canola in this way in field experiments near Canberra, Australia, from 2004 to 2006, using European winter and mid–late maturing Australian spring canola varieties. Winter varieties sown from early March to mid-April produced 2.5–5.0 t/ha of biomass providing 0.3–3.5 t/ha of high-quality forage grazed by sheep in winter. The spring varieties produced similar amounts of vegetative biomass from April sowing but were unsuited to the earlier March sowing as they flowered in early winter and did not recover from grazing. The canola forage was readily eaten by sheep; alkane-based estimates of diet composition indicated that >85% of the organic matter intake consisted of canola. Canola forage was also highly digestible (86–88%) and Merino hoggets grew at 210 g/day from a dry matter intake of 1530 g DM/day. The canola generally recovered well when grazed in winter before bud elongation. Delays in flowering associated with heavy grazing ranged from 0 to 4 days when grazed before buds were visible, to 28 days if the crop had commenced flowering. Significant delays in flowering (>14 days) associated with winter grazing did not reduce seed yield or oil content when favourable spring conditions allowed compensatory growth. Yield loss was observed when winter and spring conditions were unfavourable for compensatory growth, or if grazing continued too late into spring (late September) irrespective of seasonal conditions. The yield loss was more than offset by the value of the grazed forage and the mean gross margin for dual-purpose canola over the four experiments was $240 to $500 higher than for grain-only canola depending on the value assumed for the forage. The study indicates there is considerable scope to capture value from grazing early-sown canola crops during winter without significant, uneconomic trade-offs with seed yield. Further investigations in other medium to high rainfall environments in southern Australia are warranted.
Collapse
|