The Influence of Social Determinants on Cancer Screening in a Medicaid Sample

INTRODUCTION

Little attention has been paid to the influence of individually measured social determinants of health on cancer screening tests in the Medicaid population.

METHODS

Analysis was conducted on 2015-2020 claims data from a subgroup of Medicaid enrollees from the District of Columbia Medicaid Cohort Study (N=8,943) who were eligible for colorectal (n=2,131), breast (n=1,156), and cervical cancer (n= 5,068) screening. Participants were grouped into 4 distinct social determinants of health groups on the basis of their responses to social determinants of health questionnaire. This study estimated the influence of the 4 social determinants of health groups on the receipt of each screening test using log-binomial regression adjusted for demographics, illness severity, and neighborhood-level deprivation.

RESULTS

The receipt of cancer screening tests was 42%, 58%, and 66% for colorectal, cervical, and breast cancer, respectively. Those in the most disadvantaged social determinants of health group were less likely to receive a colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy than those in the least disadvantaged one (adjusted RR=0.70, 95% CI=0.54, 0.92). The pattern for mammograms and Pap smears was similar (adjusted RR=0.94, 95% CI=0.80, 1.11 and adjusted RR=0.90, 95% CI=0.81, 1.00, respectively). In contrast, participants in the most disadvantaged social determinants of health group were more likely to receive fecal occult blood test than those in the least disadvantaged one (adjusted RR=1.52, 95% CI=1.09, 2.12).

CONCLUSIONS

Severe social determinants of health measured at the individual level are associated with lower cancer preventive screening. A targeted approach that addresses the social and economic adversities that affect cancer screening could result in higher preventive screening rates in this Medicaid population.

Mapping the Location of Health Centers in Relation to "Maternity Care Deserts": Associations With Utilization of Women's Health Providers and Services

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The aim was to explore the association between community health centers' (CHC) distance to a "maternity care desert" (MCD) and utilization of maternity-related health care services, controlling for CHC and county-level factors.

MEASURES

Utilization as: total number of CHC visits to obstetrician-gynecologists, certified nurse midwives, family physicians (FP), and nurse practitioners (NP); total number of prenatal care visits and deliveries performed by CHC staff.

RESEARCH DESIGN

Cross-sectional design comparing utilization between CHCs close to MCDs and those that were not, using linked 2017 data from the Uniform Data System (UDS), American Hospital Association Survey, and Area Health Resource Files. On the basis of prior research, CHCs close to a "desert" were hypothesized to provide higher numbers of FP and NP visits than obstetrician-gynecologists and certified nurse midwives visits. The sample included 1261 CHCs and all counties in the United States and Puerto Rico (n=3234).

RESULTS

Results confirm the hypothesis regarding NP visits but are mixed for FP visits. CHCs close to "deserts" had more NP visits than those that were not. There was also a dose-response effect by MCD classification, with NP visits 3 times higher at CHCs located near areas without any outpatient and inpatient access to maternity care.

CONCLUSIONS

CHCs located closer to "deserts" and NPs working at these comprehensive, primary care clinics have an important role to play in providing access to maternity care. More research is needed to determine how best to target resources to these limited access areas.

Choosing between medical management and liver transplant in urea cycle disorders: A conceptual framework for parental treatment decision-making in rare disease

Urea cycle disorders (UCD) are rare inherited metabolic disorders caused by deficiencies of enzymes and transporters required to convert neurotoxic ammonia into urea. These deficiencies cause elevated blood ammonia, which if untreated may result in death, but even with optimal medical management, often results in recurrent brain damage. There are two major treatments for UCD: medical management or liver transplantation. Both are associated with mortality and morbidity but the evidence comparing outcomes is sparse. Thus, families face a dilemma: should their child be managed medically, or should they undergo a liver transplant? To (a) describe the factors that contribute to treatment choice among parents of children diagnosed with UCD and to (b) organise these factors into a conceptual framework that reflects how these issues interrelate to shape the decision-making experience of this population. Utilising grounded theory, qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews with parents (N = 35) and providers (N = 26) of children diagnosed with UCD and parent focus groups (N = 19). Thematic content analysis and selective and axial coding were applied. The framework highlights the life-cycle catalysts that frame families' personal perceptions of risks and benefits and describes the clinical, personal, social, and system factors that drive treatment choice including disease severity, stability, and burden, independence, peer experiences, and cost, coverage and access to quality care. Findings equip providers with evidence upon which to prepare for productive patient interactions about treatment options. They also provide a foundation for the development of patient-centred outcome measures to better evaluate effectiveness of treatments in this population.

Laboratories in the new Swiss health care system

The objectives of the health reforms introduced in 1994 include universal coverage and cost containment. With these reforms, a new uniform for schedule and standards for laboratories have been introduced. The impact of these reforms is yet to be realized. It is predicted that with the imposition of new standards, many laboratories based in physicians' offices will disappear. Standards will also require more scientists and physicians trained in laboratory medicine.

Medicaid managed care: how do community health centers fit?

Managed care has brought about important changes in how the health care system is financed and services delivered. The authors describe the approaches adopted by community health centers to participate in Medicaid managed care and argue that these providers, commonly referred to as providers of last resort, have a role to play in this system. Many challenges lie ahead for these centers, such as the potential imposition of Medicaid block grants, the increasing number of uninsured persons, and cuts in both Federal grants and State budgets. These various forces may adversely impact health centers, leaving them with more uninsured patients and fewer resources.