Combatting emerging infectious diseases from Nipah to COVID-19 in Kerala, India

BACKGROUND

The state of Kerala, India, has experienced several unprecedented events in the past few years. The current study was an attempt to explore perceptions of stakeholders on how the decentralised system helped during the Nipah virus (NiV) outbreaks and COVID-19 pandemic in Kerala.

METHODS

This study used a qualitative descriptive approach built on the advocacy paradigm. The stakeholders who were involved in decision-making and the representatives of local self-government who had real-time experience and had handled the challenges were identified using purposive sampling. Seven key informant interviews (KIIs) and nine in-depth interviews (IDIs) were conducted.

RESULTS

Findings indicate that decentralisation had enabled the state to effectively deal with the outbreaks and the pandemic. The survey revealed four major themes: decision-making, engagement level, people-centric action, and difficulties. Two to four categories have emerged for each theme.

CONCLUSION

The study results highlight the importance of human resources and service delivery as balancing factors during public health emergencies in any developing nation with limited resources. Given that very few nations have the healthcare infrastructure and resources necessary to cater to the healthcare needs of the whole population, decentralisation should be reinforced.

Hypothermia for moderate or severe neonatal encephalopathy in low-income and middle-income countries (HELIX): a randomised controlled trial in India, Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh

BACKGROUND

Although therapeutic hypothermia reduces death or disability after neonatal encephalopathy in high-income countries, its safety and efficacy in low-income and middle-income countries is unclear. We aimed to examine whether therapeutic hypothermia alongside optimal supportive intensive care reduces death or moderate or severe disability after neonatal encephalopathy in south Asia.

METHODS

We did a multicountry open-label, randomised controlled trial in seven tertiary neonatal intensive care units in India, Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh. We enrolled infants born at or after 36 weeks of gestation with moderate or severe neonatal encephalopathy and a need for continued resuscitation at 5 min of age or an Apgar score of less than 6 at 5 min of age (for babies born in a hospital), or both, or an absence of crying by 5 min of age (for babies born at home). Using a web-based randomisation system, we allocated infants into a group receiving whole body hypothermia (33·5°C) for 72 h using a servo-controlled cooling device, or to usual care (control group), within 6 h of birth. All recruiting sites had facilities for invasive ventilation, cardiovascular support, and access to 3 Tesla MRI scanners and spectroscopy. Masking of the intervention was not possible, but those involved in the magnetic resonance biomarker analysis and neurodevelopmental outcome assessments were masked to the allocation. The primary outcome was a combined endpoint of death or moderate or severe disability at 18-22 months, assessed by the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (third edition) and a detailed neurological examination. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02387385.

FINDINGS

We screened 2296 infants between Aug 15, 2015, and Feb 15, 2019, of whom 576 infants were eligible for inclusion. After exclusions, we recruited 408 eligible infants and we assigned 202 to the hypothermia group and 206 to the control group. Primary outcome data were available for 195 (97%) of the 202 infants in the hypothermia group and 199 (97%) of the 206 control group infants. 98 (50%) infants in the hypothermia group and 94 (47%) infants in the control group died or had a moderate or severe disability (risk ratio 1·06; 95% CI 0·87-1·30; p=0·55). 84 infants (42%) in the hypothermia group and 63 (31%; p=0·022) infants in the control group died, of whom 72 (36%) and 49 (24%; p=0·0087) died during neonatal hospitalisation. Five serious adverse events were reported: three in the hypothermia group (one hospital readmission relating to pneumonia, one septic arthritis, and one suspected venous thrombosis), and two in the control group (one related to desaturations during MRI and other because of endotracheal tube displacement during transport for MRI). No adverse events were considered causally related to the study intervention.

INTERPRETATION

Therapeutic hypothermia did not reduce the combined outcome of death or disability at 18 months after neonatal encephalopathy in low-income and middle-income countries, but significantly increased death alone. Therapeutic hypothermia should not be offered as treatment for neonatal encephalopathy in low-income and middle-income countries, even when tertiary neonatal intensive care facilities are available.

FUNDING

National Institute for Health Research, Garfield Weston Foundation, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

TRANSLATIONS

For the Hindi, Malayalam, Telugu, Kannada, Singhalese, Tamil, Marathi and Bangla translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.