Perioperative nutrition: Recommendations from the ESPEN expert group

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Malnutrition has been recognized as a major risk factor for adverse postoperative outcomes. The ESPEN Symposium on perioperative nutrition was held in Nottingham, UK, on 14-15 October 2018 and the aims of this document were to highlight the scientific basis for the nutritional and metabolic management of surgical patients.

METHODS

This paper represents the opinion of experts in this multidisciplinary field and those of a patient and caregiver, based on current evidence. It highlights the current state of the art.

RESULTS

Surgical patients may present with varying degrees of malnutrition, sarcopenia, cachexia, obesity and myosteatosis. Preoperative optimization can help improve outcomes. Perioperative fluid therapy should aim at keeping the patient in as near zero fluid and electrolyte balance as possible. Similarly, glycemic control is especially important in those patients with poorly controlled diabetes, with a stepwise increase in the risk of infectious complications and mortality per increasing HbA1c. Immobilization can induce a decline in basal energy expenditure, reduced insulin sensitivity, anabolic resistance to protein nutrition and muscle strength, all of which impair clinical outcomes. There is a role for pharmaconutrition, pre-, pro- and syn-biotics, with the evidence being stronger in those undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Nutritional assessment of the surgical patient together with the appropriate interventions to restore the energy deficit, avoid weight loss, preserve the gut microbiome and improve functional performance are all necessary components of the nutritional, metabolic and functional conditioning of the surgical patient.

Planning and management tools to help with provision of effective health care

Introduces the Planman system of techniques and diagrams. Describes each tool and how it should be used. Suggests that this system could meet many of the planning and management needs of the health-care profession.

Normal coronary arteriogram. An avoidable test?

Between 10 and 20% of coronary arteriograms in patients with chest pain show normal vessels, often in association with a history of "atypical" angina. Conventional non-invasive tests are inaccurate in this group of patients compared with those with classical angina. This study prospectively evaluates combined 12 lead exercise electrocardiography and thallium-201 scintigraphy as a screening test in patients with atypical angina in order to determine whether normal arteriograms are avoidable in this important subgroup of patients presenting with chest pain. Sixty seven consecutive patients with atypical angina underwent both maximal exercise testing and thallium scintigraphy before coronary arteriography. Chest pain during exercise was a poor predictor of coronary disease in this group. Eleven (16%) had abnormal arteriography, with the sensitivity of exercise and thallium tests being 45% and 73%, respectively. When both tests were applied the predictive accuracy for normal coronary arteries was 96% (54/56) and that for the presence of coronary disease was 82% (9/11). If coronary arteriography was withheld in patients in whom both the exercise test and thallium scintigraphy were negative, the number of normal coronary arteriograms could be reduced with only a very small risk of failing to detect individuals with coronary disease.