[The effect of intensified training therapy on axial spondylarthritis in day care units]

BACKGROUND

Day care units are an essential part of psychiatric treatment in Germany. In rheumatology they are also regularly used. Axial spondylarthritis (axSpA) is an inflammatory rheumatic disease that causes pain, diminished quality of life, limitations in activities of daily living and ability to work, especially if insufficiently treated. The multimodal rheumatologic complex treatment with at least 14 days of inpatient care is an established tool to control exacerbated disease activity. The feasibility and effect of an equivalent treatment in a day care setting has not yet been evaluated.

METHODS

The effect of a therapy in a day care unit comparable to the inpatient multimodal rheumatologic complex treatment was investigated using clinically established patient reported outcomes (NAS pain, FFbH, BASDAI, BASFI).

RESULTS

Selected subgroups of axSpA patients can routinely and effectively be treated in day care units. Intensified multimodal as well as nonintensified treatment forms lead to reduced disease activity. Additionally, compared to nonintensified treatment, the intensified multimodal treatment approach leads to significantly reduced pain, and disease-related and functional limitations in daily life.

CONCLUSION

If available, treatment in a day care unit can complement the established inpatient treatment modalities in selected axSpA patients. In cases with high disease activity and suffering, intensified multimodal treatment should be preferred due to better outcomes.

[Frequency and severity of sarcopenia in patients with inflammatory and noninflammatory musculoskeletal diseases : Results of a monocentric study in a tertiary care center]

INTRODUCTION

Sarcopenia (SP) is defined as the pathological loss of muscle mass and function. This is a clinically relevant problem, especially in geriatric patients, because SP is associated with falls, frailty, loss of function, and increased mortality. People with inflammatory and degenerative rheumatic musculoskeletal disorders (RMD) are also at risk for developing SP; however, there is little research on the prevalence of this health disorder in this patient group using currently available SP criteria.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prevalence and severity of SP in patients with RMD.

METHODS

A total of 141 consecutive patients over 65 years of age with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondylarthritis (SpA), vasculitis, and noninflammatory musculoskeletal diseases were recruited in a cross-sectional study at a tertiary care center. The European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP 1 and 2) definitions of presarcopenia, SP, and severe SP were used to determine the prevalence. Lean mass as a parameter of muscle mass and bone density were measured by dual X‑ray absorptiometry (DXA). Handgrip strength and the short physical performance battery (SPPB) were performed in a standardized manner. Furthermore, the frequency of falls and the presence of frailty were determined. Student's T-test and the χ2-test were used for statistics.

RESULTS

Of the patients included 73% were female, the mean age was 73 years and 80% had an inflammatory RMD. According to EWGSOP 2, 58.9% of participants probable had SP due to low muscle function. When muscle mass was added for confirmation, the prevalence of SP was 10.6%, 5.6% of whom had severe SP. The prevalence was numerically but not statistically different between inflammatory (11.5%) and noninflammatory RMD (7.1%). The prevalence of SP was highest in patients with RA (9.5%) and vasculitis (24%), and lowest in SpA (4%). Both osteoporosis (40% vs. 18.5%) and falls (15% vs. 8.6%) occurred more frequently in patients with SP than those without SP.

DISCUSSION

This study showed a relatively high prevalence of SP, especially in patients with RA and vasculitis. In patients at risk, measures to detect SP should routinely be performed in a standardized manner in the clinical practice. The high frequency of muscle function deficits in this study population supports the importance of measuring muscle mass in addition to bone density with DXA to confirm SP.

AB1400 ARE COMORBIDITIES IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC INFLAMMATORY RHEUMATIC DISEASES ASSOCIATED WITH TREATMENT NON-ADHERENCE TO BIOSIMILARS IN A NON-MEDICAL SWITCH SCENARIO?

Background

The availability of biosimilars has created a financial incentive to encourage non-medical switching if cheaper products are on the market. In patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (CIRD), we have previously reported a relatively high retention rate after switching from originator etanercept to its biosimilar. However, this has been different in other studies and the reasons for non-adherence are poorly understood. Comorbidity has recently gained much attention in patients with CIRD and might be a reason for non-adherence.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to analyse the effectiveness and safety of systematic non-medical switching from originator adalimumab (ADA) to ADA ABP501 biosimilar (ABP) over 6 months in patients with CIRD and to investigate the influence of comorbidities on retention rates.

Methods

Patients with CIRD on originator ADA who switched to ABP subsequently from October 2018 onwards were identified from a large routine database and then followed for 6 months. The presence of comorbidities and disease characteristics as well as measures of disease activity, physical function and changes in treatment were documented at baseline (the time of switching from originator ADA to ABP), and at months 3 and 6. Longitudinal data including information on the clinical efficacy and safety of ABP, and the reasons for discontinuation were documented.

Results

A total of 111 CIRD patients on treatment with originator ADA were switched to the biosimilar ABP (Table 1). More than half of the patients (62%) had a Charlson comorbidity score of 0, though there were differences between disease subtypes. RA patients were comparatively older (mean age 65 years) and had the highest mean Charlson score (1.8). Treatment retention varied only slightly between patients with a Charlson score of 0 and those with ≥0 (Figure 1). In both groups, the majority of patients (90% vs 95%) continued therapy with ABP, while only a small proportion either switched back to originator ADA (6% vs 5%), switched to a different biologic (3% vs 0%), or dropped out (1% vs 0%). The main reason for back switch was the occurrence of adverse events, mostly subjective complaints, most frequently pain. Patients with a Charlson comorbidity score > 0 tended to have poorer scores in trajectories of scores for disease activity and physical function stratified by disease subtype.

Figure 1.

Treatment retention after 6 months stratified by the Charlson comorbidity score

Table 1.

Patients and disease characteristics

RAaxSpAPsAOtherN=23N=68N=15N=5Age (years), mean (SD)65.1 (12.0)47.3 (13.1)51.1 (11.2)41.8 (14.2)Women60.9% (14)32.4% (22)53.3% (8)40.0% (2)Disease duration (years), median (IQR)4.0 (3.0-8.0)5.0 (2.0-8.0)4.0 (2.0-13.0)7.0 (4.0-7.0)Duration originator ADA therapy (month), mean (SD)43.8 (28.6)39.4 (26.9)34.7 (29.0)60.9 (27.7)Charlson score, mean (SD)1.8 (2.1)0.6 (1.1)0.7 (1.2)0.2 (0.4)Gastroenterological comorbidities26.1% (6)22.1% (15)6.7% (1)0Hepatic comorbidities17.4% (4)2.9% (2)13.3% (2)0Hematological conditions8.7% (2)2.9% (2)13.3% (2)0Cardiovascular comorbidities60.9% (14)32.4% (22)33.3% (5)60.0% (3)Neurological and psychological comorbidities8.7% (2)17.6% (12)33.3% (5)0Metabolic comorbidities21.7% (5)7.4% (5)26.7% (4)40.0% (2)Osteoporosis43.5% (10)11.9% (8)6.7% (1)20.0% (1)Lung diseases21.7% (5)8.8% (6)040.0% (2)Skin diseases26.1% (6)26.5% (18)80.0% (12)20.0% (1)Eye diseases8.7% (2)23.5% (16)6.7% (1)60.0% (3)Kidney diseases13.0% (3)10.3% (7)040.0% (2)

Conclusion

Comorbidity had no influence on the biosimilar retention rate after 6 months in this study but the majority of patients did not have Charlson scores > 0. However, disease activity and physical function tended to be worse among CIRD patients with comorbidity. Cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis were more often present in RA patients than in axSpA or PsA patients, while neurological and psychological comorbidities were more often observed in the latter.

Disclosure of Interests

Imke Redeker: None declared, Stefan Moustakis: None declared, Styliani Tsiami: None declared, Xenofon Baraliakos Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Pfizer, MSD, UCB, Novartis, Lilly, Galapagos, Hexal, Paid instructor for: Abbvie, Pfizer, MSD, UCB, Novartis, Lilly, Galapagos, Hexal, Consultant of: Abbvie, Pfizer, MSD, UCB, Novartis, Lilly, Galapagos, Hexal, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Pfizer, MSD, UCB, Novartis, Lilly, Galapagos, Hexal, Ioana Andreica Speakers bureau: UCB, MSD, Novartis, Abbvie, Lilly, Janssen, SOBI, Consultant of: Lilly, Novartis, Galapagos, Amgen, Takkeda, SOBI, Grant/research support from: Lilly, Bjoern Buehring Speakers bureau: UCB, Amgen, Gilad/Galapagos, Biogen, Sanofi/Genzyme, Consultant of: UCB, Theramex, Gilead/Galapagos, Amgen, Abbvie, Juergen Braun Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Boehringer, Celltrion, Chugai, Fresenius, Hexal, Janssen, Lilly, Medac, MSD, Mylan, Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer und UCB, Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Boehringer, Celltrion, Chugai, Fresenius, Hexal, Janssen, Lilly, Medac, MSD, Mylan, Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer und UCB, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Boehringer, Celltrion, Chugai, Fresenius, Hexal, Janssen, Lilly, Medac, MSD, Mylan, Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer und UCB, Uta Kiltz Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Biocad, Biogen, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Hexal, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Biocad, Biogen, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Fresenius, Hexal, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Fresenius, GSK, Hexal, Novartis, Pfizer.

AB0823 TREATMENT WITH ADALIMUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC INFLAMMATORY RHEUMATIC DISEASES: A STUDY OF TREATMENT TRAJECTORIES ON A PATIENT LEVEL IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

Background:

There is evidence that drug retention rates to adalimumab (ADA) in patients (pts.) with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (CIRD) are impaired by loss of efficacy and adverse events, and that about 50% of users had discontinued ADA within 5 years (1). With the introduction of ADA biosimilars in October 2018, non-medical switching from originator to ADA biosimilars is now increasingly part of daily practice in rheumatologic care.

Objectives:

The aim was to study treatment trajectories over two years in pts. with CIRD receiving originator ADA.

Methods:

Pts. with CIRD on originator ADA who switched to ADA biosimilar from October 2018 onwards were identified and followed until 2020. Disease activity (ASDAS), physical function (HAQ, BASFI), and changes in treatment were documented every 3 months. The four predefined treatment trajectories “continued ADA biosimilar therapy”, “back-switch to originator ADA therapy”, “switch to other biological (b) disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy”, and “stopped bDMARD therapy /death /drop out” were used to compare characteristics of pts. with different trajectories.

Results:

A total of 111 CIRD pts. on treatment with originator ADA were switched to ADA biosimilar (Table 1). The majority of pts. 75 continued therapy with ADA biosimilar (Figure 1 next page) while 16% switched back to originator ADA, 7% switched to a different bDMARD, and 9% either stopped treatment (n=9) or died (n=1). Pts. who continued ADA biosimilar were more frequently male, older or with a longer disease duration than those who switched therapy back to originator ADA and those who switched to a different bDMARD (Table 1). The previous duration on originator ADA treatment was increased in patients who continued ADA biosimilar compared to those who switched therapy back to originator ADA and those who switched to a different bDMARD. There was more functional impairment (HAQ, BASFI) and higher disease activity (ASDAS) in pts. who switched compared to those who continued ADA biosimilar therapy (Table 1). Treatment with csDMARDs and glucocorticoids was increased in pts. who continued ADA biosimilar therapy, while pts. who switched therapy had more previous bDMARD therapies (Table 1).

Table 1.

Characteristics of patients at baseline for the entire group and stratified by treatment trajectory

Total groupN=111 (100%)Treatment trajectorycontinued ADA biosimilar therapyN=75 (67.6%)back-switch to originator ADA therapyN=18 (16.2%)switch to different bDMARD therapyN=8 (7.2%)no bDMARD therapy /death /drop outN=10 (9.0%)Age, y51.2 (14.5)51.5 (13.6)50.6 (16.8)43.5 (9.5)56.4 (19.0)Women, No. (%)46 (41.4)27 (36.0)9 (50.0)6 (75.0)4 (40.0)RA23 (20.7)17 (22.7)2 (11.1)1 (12.5)3 (30.0)axSpA68 (61.3)47 (62.7)11 (61.1)6 (75.0)4 (40.0)PsA15 (13.5)7 (9.3)4 (22.2)1 (12.5)3 (30.0)Other diagnoses5 (4.5)4 (5.3)1 (5.6)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)Disease duration, median (IQR), y5.0 (2.0-8.0)5.0 (2.0-9.0)3.5 (2.0-6.0)2.0 (1.0-5.5)4.5 (2.0-8.0)Duration previous originator ADA therapy40.7 (27.7)45.3 (27.8)35.0 (25.2)20.3 (24.7)32.3 (25.1)DAS283.0 (1.0)2.9 (1.0)3.4 (1.0)-3.3 (1.2)CRP, median (IQR), mg/L0.2 (0.1-0.3)0.1 (0.1-0.2)0.2 (0.0-0.5)0.2 (0.2-1.3)0.3 (0.2-0.4)HAQ score1.3 (0.8)1.1 (0.7)1.7 (0.8)-1.8 (1.0)ASDAS2.2 (1.1)2.0 (1.0)3.0 (1.2)2.7 (0.9)2.3 (0.2)BASFI3.5 (2.6)3.0 (2.5)5.4 (2.4)3.4 (1.6)5.4 (1.6)

+values are given as mean (SD)

Conclusion:

Two thirds of pts. who switched to ADA biosimilar remained on this therapy for 2 years. As many as 16% of pts. switched back to ADA originator. Whether or to what degree this was influenced by nocebo effects needs further study. The same is true for the effect of functional impairment – it would be interesting to know whether this was due to inflammation or structural damage.

References:

[1]Neovius M et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2015; 74:354-360

[2]The study was funded by Hexal Germany.

Figure 1.

Treatment trajectories of ADA therapy in patients with CIRD during two years ADA: adalimumab; bDMARD: biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

POS0973 CONTEXTUAL FACTORS SHOULD COMPLETE THE ASSESSMENT OF FUNCTIONING IN PATIENTS WITH AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS (axSpA)

Background:

Functioning of patients (pts.) with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is influenced by a variety of factors. In contrast to clinical factors, the influence of contextual factors on functioning has not been well studied. According to the According to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), functioning is a complex interaction between health status and contextual factors such as social support, relationships and attitudes.

Objectives:

The aim of this study is to understand limitations in participation and to investigate barriers and facilitators of contextual factors in pts. with axSpA.

Methods:

Consecutive axSpA pts. underwent a standardized assessment with collection of patient and disease characteristics, patient-reported outcomes (ASDAS, BASFI, BASMI, PHQ-9, ICF Measure of Participation and ACTivities questionnaire (IMPACT-S (0-100%)), ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI and environment factor item set (EFIS) (1). The EFIS contains 9 dichotomous questions addressing ICF categories of products and technologies (e1), support and relationship (e3), attitudes (e4) and health services (e5). Validated cut-offs of ASAS HI were used to categorize global functioning.

Results:

A total of 200 axSpA pts. were included: 69% males, 44.3±12.5 years, symptom duration 17.9±12.6 years, ASDAS 2.5±1.1, BASFI 4.0±2.7, BASMI 3.5±1.8, ASAS HI 7.0±4.1. Pts. reported limitations in the IMPACT-S activity and participation domain (82.3% (15.2) and 83.5% (16.8), respectively. The majority of pts. reported as barrier that treatment of axSpA requires time (e4, 58.5%). A minority of pts. but quite a few reported as barrier the need for support by family members (e3, 43.5%), the need to modify home and work environment (e1, 39.5%) and that they cannot rely on family members for help (e3, 22%). Some pts. (< 20%) reported that they have problems to be understood by health care professionals when experiencing a flare (e5, 18.5%), that pts. at home are not adequately taken care of (e4, 18.5%), disliking friends’ behavior toward them (e4, 13.5%), and that friends are too demanding (e4, 13%). The majority of pts. (e4, 75.9%) identified attitudes of friends as the only and major facilitator. All pts. reporting at least one barrier had significantly worse global functioning (ASAS HI, IMPACT-S), and depression (PHQ-9) compared to patients who reported no barriers in the respective ICF categories (p< 0.01). Similarly, pts. with poor functioning are more likely to report barriers in contextual factors compared to pts. with good functioning (Table 1). Pts. having to ask for more support from their families expressed the feeling that they cannot rely on that.

Conclusion:

Barriers more than facilitators of contextual factors are present in pts. with axSpA. This study shows that barriers in contextual factors are more common in pts. with impairments in self-reported and performed functioning as in those without impairments. This underlines the importance of contextual factors in the management of axSpA pts.

References:

[1]Kiltz et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72(s3):572

Table 1.

Presence of contextual factors, stratified for global functioning categories

ICF categoryEFIS ItemGlobal Functioning (ASAS HI 0-17)Good ≤ 5(n= 69)Moderate <5 to <12(n= 106Poor ≥ 12(n= 25)e3EFIS 1: As a result of my rheumatic disease, the children take more responsibility for household tasks.11 (15.9)55 (51.9)21 (84)e3EFIS 2: I don’t like the way my friends acts around me.0 (0)15 (14,2)12 (48,0)e3EFIS 3: I can’t count on my relatives to help me with my problems11 (15,9)24 (22,6)9 (36)e1EFIS 4: I modify my home and work environments.16 (23,2)47 (44,3)9 (36)e5EFIS 5: I have difficulties getting worsening of my disease acknowledged by a health care professional3 (4,3)21 (19,8)16 (64)e5EFIS 6: Treatment of my rheumatic disease is taking up time22 (31,9)73 (68,9)22 (88)e4,EFIS 7: My friends expect too much of1 (1,4)18 (17,0)7 (28)e4EFIS 8: No one pays much attention to me at home10 (14,5)20 (18,9)7 (28)e4EFIS 9: My friends understand me56 (17,4)83 (78,3)12 (48)

values given as number (%)

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared.

AB0684 LESS THAN 20% OF PATIENTS WITH A CHRONIC INFLAMMATORY RHEUMATIC DISEASE CHANGED THEIR IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE MEDICATION BECAUSE OF THE COVID 19 PANDEMIC

Background:

The best treatment options of patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (CIRD) in the pandemic have not been completely clear, especially in the beginning of the lockdown. Whether and to which degree pandemic-related therapy changes have occurred, has not been studied in detail.

Objectives:

To study the behaviour of patients with CIRD initially facing the COVID 19 pandemic related to their disease status and medication.

Methods:

Patients with CIRD were contacted by telephone to assess their health status and ask for changes in medication. Standardized assessment tools were used to assess disease activity, depression and anxiety. High disease activity was assumed if RADAI-5 ≥ 3.2 and BASDAI ≥ 4. Anxiety (HADS-A) and depression (HADS-D) of patients were assessed using HADS. A score < 8 was taken as indication of no major problem in this regard.

Results:

A total of 886 patients was interviewed between April 15 and June 15 of 2020. Here we report on 550 patients with complete information on standard assessments (62%). About 60% were female, mean age 54.4±13.7, mean disease duration 12.2±10.5 years. Most had spondyloarthritis (SpA, n=287) including axial SpA (axSpA, n=172) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA, n=116), in total 52.2%, while 40.2% had rheumatoid arthritis (RA, n=221), and 7.6% connective tissue diseases (CTD, n=42). Most RA patients were on methotrexate (48.8%), while 43.8% took glucocorticoids. In addition, 61.0% of patients were on bDMARDs, mostly on TNF inhibitors (59.6%). More SpA than RA patients were on bDMARDs: 71.0% vs 49.7% respectively. A recent change in medication was reported by 182 patients (33.1%): 89 with RA (40.2%), 88 with SpA (30.6%) and 5 with CTD (11.9%). Half of those who changed (n=92; 50.5%) admitted that the change was mainly made due to fear of the pandemic (16.7% of all patients). Altogether, significantly more patients changed bDMARDs (68.5%) than csDMARDs (57.3%). The data of patients who changed vs patients who didn’t change is shown in the Table 1, including subgroup analyses. The median HADS scores were < 8.

Table 1.

RA and SpA patients who changed and who did not change their medication

Group (N) / ReasonNActive disease (%)HADS-D≥ 8 (%)HADS-A≥ 8 (%)bDMARD therapy (%)Rheumatoid arthritis221134 (60.6)76 (35.0) [4]94 (43.3) [4]110 (50.9) [5]Spondyloarthritis287130 (45.4)83 (29.5) [6]109 (38.8) [6]204 (72.6) [6]  Pa (RA vs SpA)<0.0010.2280.354<0.001Patients did not change their medication Rheumatoid arthritis (%)132 (59.7)84 (63.6)46 (35.9) [4]58 (45.3) [4]62 (48.4) [4] Spondyloarthritis (%)199 (69.3)88 (44.2)58 (30.1) [6]69 (35.8) [6]137 (71.0) [6]  P (RA vs SpA)0.031<0.0010.3580.101<0.001Patients changed their medication Rheumatoid arthritis89 (40.3)50 (56.2)30 (33.7)36 (40.4)48 (54.5) [1]  P (vs no change)0.3310.8460.5670.457  Reason[9] Pandemic41 (51.3)15 (36.6)11 (26.8)14 (34.1)24 (60.0) [1] Inactive disease23 (28.8)12 (52.2)6 (26.1)10 (43.5)12 (52.2) Active disease b16 (20.0)14 (87.5)6 (37.5)7 (43.8)7 (43.8)  P (reasons)0.0030.6870.6870.526 Spondyloarthritis88 (30.7)42 (47.7)25 (28.4)40 (45.5)67 (76.1)  P (vs no change)0.6730.8890.1570.451  Reason[6] Pandemic50 (61.0)22 (44.0)13 (26.0)22 (44.0)42 (84.0) Inactive disease15 (18.3) 7 (46.7)4 (26.7)7 (46.7)10 (66.7) Active disease b17 (20.7)11 (64.7)6 (35.3)6 (35.3)11 (64.7)  P (reasons)0.3310.7560.7740.156  P (RA vs SpA)0.0310.2940.9500.6030.004

Data are presented as numbers (percentage proportions; across rows except for column N) or medians (interquartile ranges). Missing values are in square brackets.

a P values calculated using χ2 test or Mann-Whitney rank sum test.

b Self-reported claim of disease activity.

Conclusion:

Two thirds of patients did not change medication but one third changed. A relatively high number of patients did so due to fear of the pandemic, mostly those on biologics. There were no major differences between RA and SpA. Anxiety and depression do not seem to play an important role for the decision to change medication (Table 1 below).

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

Defining an international cut-off of two-legged countermovement jump power for sarcopenia and dysmobility syndrome

We aimed to establish jump power cut-offs for the composite outcome of either sarcopenia (EWGSOP2) or dysmobility syndrome using Asian and Caucasian cohorts. Estimated cut-offs were sex specific (women: < 19.0 W/kg; men: < 23.8 W/kg) but not ethnicity specific. Jump power has potential to be used in definitions of poor musculoskeletal health.

PURPOSE

Weight-corrected jump power measured during a countermovement jump may be a useful tool to identify individuals with poor musculoskeletal health, but no cut-off values exist. We aimed to establish jump power cut-offs for detecting individuals with either sarcopenia or dysmobility syndrome.

METHODS

Age- and sex-matched community-dwelling older adults from two cohorts (University of Wisconsin-Madison [UW], Korean Urban Rural Elderly cohort [KURE], 1:2) were analyzed. Jump power cut-offs for the composite outcome of either sarcopenia defined by EWGSOP2 or dysmobility syndrome were determined.

RESULTS

The UW (n = 95) and KURE (n = 190) cohorts were similar in age (mean 75 years) and sex distribution (68% women). Jump power was similar between KURE and UW women (19.7 vs. 18.6 W/kg, p = 0.096) and slightly higher in KURE than UW in men (26.9 vs. 24.8 W/kg, p = 0.050). In UW and KURE, the prevalence of sarcopenia (7.4% in both), dysmobility syndrome (31.6% and 27.9%), or composite of either sarcopenia or dysmobility syndrome (32.6% and 28.4%) were comparable. Low jump power cut-offs for the composite outcome differed by sex but not by ethnicity (< 19.0 W/kg in women; < 23.8 W/kg in men). Low jump power was associated with elevated odds of sarcopenia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.07), dysmobility syndrome (aOR 4.32), or the composite of sarcopenia or dysmobility syndrome (aOR 4.67, p < 0.01 for all) independent of age, sex, height, and ethnicity.

CONCLUSION

Sex-specific jump power cut-offs were found to detect the presence of either sarcopenia or dysmobility syndrome in older adults independent of Asian or Caucasian ethnicity.

SAT0579 SYSTEMATIC GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT IN OLDER PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATIC DISEASES - THE RheuMAGIC PILOT STUDY

Background:

Current demographic data predict that the number of older adults with rheumatic diseases will considerably increase in the coming years. Geriatric patients differ from younger adults in many ways including their clinical presentation, co-morbidities and response to medication. The management of such patients is often challenging due to the presence of multi-morbidity, polypharmacy and geriatric syndromes (i.e. conditions in which symptoms result from impairments in multiple systems rather than a discrete disease). To systematically assess geriatric patients, specific tools have been developed; however, they are not routinely utilized by rheumatologists. Using these tools could improve patient management and satisfaction in rheumatologic care.

Objectives:

To examine the prevalence of 17 common geriatric health problems using validated geriatric assessment tools in older patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases.

Methods:

Adults 65 years and older who presented to a tertiary rheumatologic hospital were included after informed consent. All patients recruited were assessed using theMAngableGeriatrICAssessment (MAGIC) which addresses 14 common geriatric health problems. In addition, polypharmacy (≥ 5 medication), muscle function using the Short Physical Performance Battery and frailty applying the Fried definition were assessed. Disability was quantified with the “Funktionsfragebogen Hannover” (FFbH), a validated tool for patients with rheumatologic diseases that can be easily converted to Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scores. Primary outcome was the frequency of the selected 17 geriatric health problems; the correlation of the total number of problems with HAQ scores was a secondary outcome.

Results:

Of the 300 individuals included 67% were female with a mean age of 73±6.6 years; 85% (> 50% with rheumatoid arthritis) had a rheumatologic diagnosis. The remaining participants had either a chronic pain syndrome or degenerative joint/spine disease. On average participants had 7 out of 17 assessed geriatric problems. Females had more such problems than males (8 vs. 6, p<0.0001). Chronic pain and polypharmacy were most common but several others were also seen in more than 50% of patients (see Table). The mean HAQ Score was 1.67±0.79. There was a positive correlation (see Graph) between the number of problems and the HAQ Score (R2= 0.44, p<0.0001).

Conclusion:

A systematic geriatric assessment can be successfully used to discover and quantify geriatric health problems in older patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. These problems appear to be very common and importantly, patients with more problems had poorer functional status. Frailty, depression, incomplete vaccination status, cognitive impairment or polypharmacy are all known to negatively impact patient care. Recognizing and addressing geriatric problems has the potential to lead to health care improvements including adherence and medication side effects and might increase patient satisfaction and functional status independent of disease activity.

References:

[1]Buehring, B. and S. Barczi, Assessing the Aging Patient, in Spine Surgery in an Aging Population, N. Brooks and A. Strayer, Editors. 2019, Thieme: New York. p. 208.

[2]Cleutjens F, Boonen A, van Onna MGB. Geriatric syndromes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a literature overview. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2019;37(3):496-501

Geriatric Problem% presentProblems with Daily Activities67Problems with Vision28Problems with Hearing38Problems with Falls11Problems with Urinary Incontinence38Problems with Depression57Lack of Social Support10Incomplete Vaccinations53Problems with Cognition31Problems with Chronic Pain90Problems with Dizziness44Problems with Mobility41Problems with Unintentional Weight Loss30Inappropriate Medications present17Polypharmacy present81Frailty present46Short Physical Performance Battery low57

Acknowledgments:

None

Disclosure of Interests:

Anna Berrisch: None declared, Ioana Andreica: None declared, Styliani Tsiami: None declared, David Kiefer Grant/research support from: Novartis, Uta Kiltz Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Novartis, Pfizer, Consultant of: AbbVie, Biocad, Eli Lilly and Company, Grünenthal, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, Xenofon Baraliakos Grant/research support from: Grant/research support from: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB and Werfen, Consultant of: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB and Werfen, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB and Werfen, Juergen Braun Grant/research support from: Abbvie (Abbott), Amgen, BMS, Boehringer, Celgene, Celltrion, Centocor, Chugai, Eli Lilly and Company, Medac, MSD (Schering Plough), Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer (Wyeth), Roche, Sanofi- Aventis, and UCB Pharma, Consultant of: Abbvie (Abbott), Amgen, BMS, Boehringer, Celgene, Celltrion, Centocor, Chugai, EBEWE Pharma, Eli Lilly and Company, Medac, MSD (Schering-Plough), Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer (Wyeth), Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, and UCB Pharma, Speakers bureau: Abbvie (Abbott), Amgen, BMS, Boehringer, Celgene, Celltrion, Centocor, Chugai, EBEWE Pharma, Eli Lilly and Company, Medac, MSD (Schering-Plough), Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer (Wyeth), Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, and UCB Pharma, Bjoern Buehring Grant/research support from: GE/Lunar, Kinemed, Consultant of: Gilead, Abbvie, Lilly, GE/Lunar, Janssen, Amgen, Speakers bureau: UCB

AB1245 DAILY MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS: SELF-MONITORING OF DISEASE ACTIVITY WITH A SMARTPHONE APP IS FEASIBLE – A PROOF OF CONCEPT STUDY

Background:

Assessment and monitoring of disease activity and functioning is of major importance for the course of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). This is equally important for patient monitoring in daily routine as also for tight control strategies. Even though there is evidence that a closer monitoring of patients is better than routine care, more intensive treatment schedules are often not realized in daily practice for several reasons including shortage of time and personal resources. Using application software devices (apps) in clinical routine for the recording of disease-specific patient reported outcomes (PRO) may facilitate monitoring and improve clinical decision processes but there is a lack of data on the use of apps.

Objectives:

To investigate the use of such App technology in respect to usability, feasibility and equivalence of data in daily care of patients with axSpA. In more detail, it will be first determined how many patients are capable and ready to use the technology in a routine setting. Furthermore, the usage and behavior of patients using the app will be studied, the usability of the app and the equivalence of the collected parameters as well as the adherence to the documentation of disease activity over time.

Methods:

Patients diagnosed with axSpA were consecutively included in this ongoing monocentric prospective cohort study. In addition to patient and disease characteristics, information on previous experience with digital health apps was collected. Patients were asked to submit BASDAI and BASFI scores regularly every 2 weeks. The free to use AxSpA Live App is available for Android and iOS as a Class I certified medical device.

Results:

Out of 103 axSpA patients asked, 69 patients with axSpA (mean age 41.5 ± 11.3, 58% male, 76.8% use of bDMARDs, BASDAI 4.3 ± 2.0, BASFI 3.8 ± 2.5) out of 103 patients (67%) agreed to use participate, while 5 did not have a smartphone, 1 was unable to download the app for technical reasons, 28 reported other personal reasons). Of the 69, 62 patients (89.9%) reported using electronic media frequently and had used digital health apps (mean apps used 1.0 ± 1.3) in everyday life before. There were no systematic differences between pain levels documented on paper or by app at baseline (ICC 0.9 (95%CI 0.82 – 0.93). Out of 55 patients who completed week 2, only 33 patients (60%) used the App regularly to transmit their BASDAI/BASFI responses within the first two weeks (60%). Patients who started a new drug treatment because of high disease activity, reported BASDAI values more often than patients without a treatment change within a follow-up period of 5.5± 2.4 weeks (Table).

Conclusion:

The majority of patients with axSpA were able to use the AxSpA Live App. Most patients report scores regularly. The current disease activity seems to influence the adherence to reporting.

Patients without change in their medication (n=53)Patients with change in their medication (n=16)Age, years42.0 (11.9)39.8 (9.3)Sex, male (%)62.343.8BASDAI, baseline4.1 (2.1)4.9 (1.7)BASFI, baseline3.8 (2.6)3.8 (2.3)Time of follow-up, in weeks5.4 (2.4)5.6 (2.5)Number of transmitted BASDAI values at week 222 (41%)11 (69%)Median number of transmitted BASDAI values during follow up1.0(3.6)1.5 (1.4)

This work was supported by an unrestricted Grant by Novartis Pharma GmbH, Germany

Acknowledgments:

n/a

Disclosure of Interests:

Uta Kiltz Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Novartis, Pfizer, Consultant of: AbbVie, Biocad, Eli Lilly and Company, Grünenthal, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, Robin Kempin: None declared, Anna Schlegel: None declared, Xenofon Baraliakos Grant/research support from: Grant/research support from: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB and Werfen, Consultant of: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB and Werfen, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB and Werfen, Styliani Tsiami: None declared, Bjoern Buehring Grant/research support from: GE/Lunar, Kinemed, Consultant of: Gilead, Abbvie, Lilly, GE/Lunar, Janssen, Amgen, Speakers bureau: UCB, David Kiefer Grant/research support from: Novartis, Juergen Braun Grant/research support from: Abbvie (Abbott), Amgen, BMS, Boehringer, Celgene, Celltrion, Centocor, Chugai, Eli Lilly and Company, Medac, MSD (Schering Plough), Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer (Wyeth), Roche, Sanofi- Aventis, and UCB Pharma, Consultant of: Abbvie (Abbott), Amgen, BMS, Boehringer, Celgene, Celltrion, Centocor, Chugai, EBEWE Pharma, Eli Lilly and Company, Medac, MSD (Schering-Plough), Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer (Wyeth), Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, and UCB Pharma, Speakers bureau: Abbvie (Abbott), Amgen, BMS, Boehringer, Celgene, Celltrion, Centocor, Chugai, EBEWE Pharma, Eli Lilly and Company, Medac, MSD (Schering-Plough), Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer (Wyeth), Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, and UCB Pharma

[Evaluation of the trabecular bone score (TBS) in routine clinical care of patients with inflammatory rheumatic and non-inflammatory diseases : Correlation with conventional bone mineral density measurement and prevalence of vertebral fractures]

Hintergrund

Osteoporosebedingte Frakturen sind bei Patienten mit rheumatoider Arthritis (RA) häufig. Die Messung der Knochenmineraldichte (KDM) mit der Dual-Energie-Röntgenabsorptionsmessung (DXA) allein sagt das Frakturrisiko nur begrenzt voraus. Der Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) ist ein Surrogatmarker für die trabekuläre Mikroarchitektur des Knochens, der das Frakturrisiko unabhängig von der KDM vorhersagen kann.

Ziel

Ermittlung der Prävalenz von KDM, TBS und osteoporotisch bedingten Wirbelkörperbrüchen („vertebral fractures“ [VF]) bei Patienten mit RA im Vergleich zu Kontrollen mit nichtentzündlichen Muskel-Skelett-Erkrankungen (MSK).

Methoden

Die Daten von Patienten mit von Rheumatologen diagnostizierter RA und verfügbaren TBS- und DXA-Messungen, die in unserem Krankenhaus von 2006 bis 2014 erhoben wurden, wurden retrospektiv analysiert. Den RA-Patienten wurden Kontrollen mit nichtentzündlichen MSK zugeordnet. Eine „reduzierte Knochengesundheit“ wurde definiert als ein T‑Score <−1,0 und/oder ein TBS-Wert <−1,31. Statistische Vergleiche wurden mit dem Mann-Whitney- und dem Wilcoxon-Test durchgeführt.

Ergebnisse

Es wurden 143 Patienten mit RA (Alter 72,1 ± 11,1 Jahre, 72 % weiblich) und 106 Kontrollen (Alter 69,6 ± 12,6 Jahre, 75 % weiblich) eingeschlossen. RA-Patienten hatten häufiger eine erniedrigte KDM (n = 102; 71,3 %) und einen erniedrigen TBS-Wert (n = 125; 87,4 %) als die Kontrollen (n = 63; 59,4 % und n = 79; 74,5 %, p = 0,049 und p = 0,009). RA-Patienten hatten mehr VF (n = 52, 36,4 %) als Kontrollen (n = 24, 22,6 %, p = 0,02). Insgesamt hatten 20 Patienten mit VF (26,3 %) eine normale Wirbelsäulen-KDM und 9 (11,8 %) auch eine normale Hüft-KDM. Bei Patienten mit VF war die Kombination eines niedrigen TBS bei normaler WS-KDM häufiger als ein normaler TBS bei niedriger WS-KDM (p = 0,008 für RA, p = 0,025 für Kontrollen).

Diskussion

VF treten bei Patienten mit normaler KDM auf. Bei Patienten mit VF wurde eine niedrige TBS bei normaler Wirbelsäulen-KDM häufiger gefunden als eine normale TBS bei niedriger Wirbelsäulen-KDM. Die Messung des TBS scheint für die Erkennung eines erhöhten Frakturrisikos bei RA-Patienten mit normaler WS-KDM nützlich zu sein.

DXA Errors Are Common and Reduced by Use of a Reporting Template

OBJECTIVE

High quality dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) acquisition, analysis, and reporting demands technical and interpretive excellence. We hypothesized that DXA errors are common and of such magnitude that incorrect clinical decisions might result. In this 2-phase study, we evaluated DXA technical and interpretation error rates in a clinical population and subsequently assessed if implementing an interpretation template reduced errors.

METHODS

In phase 1, DXA scans of 345 osteoporosis clinic referrals were reviewed by International Society for Clinical Densitometry-certified technologists (n = 3) and physicians (n = 3). Technologists applied International Society for Clinical Densitometry performance standards to assess technical quality. Physicians assessed reporting compliance with published guidance, relevance of technical errors and determined overall and major error prevalence. Major errors were defined as "provision of inaccurate information that could potentially lead to incorrect patient care decisions." In phase 2, a DXA reporting template was implemented at 2 clinical DXA sites after which the 3 physicians reviewed 200 images and reports as above. The error prevalence was compared with the 298 patients in phase 1 from these sites.

RESULTS

In phase 1, technical errors were identified in 90% of patients and affected interpretation in 13%. Interpretation errors were present in 80% of patients; 42% were major. The most common major errors were reporting incorrect information on bone mineral density change (70%) and incorrect diagnosis (22%). In phase 2, at these 2 clinical sites, major errors were present in 37% before and 17% after template implementation. Template usage reduced the odds of major error by 66% (odds ratio 0.34, 95% confidence interval 0.21, 0.53, and p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

DXA technical and interpretation errors are extremely common and likely adversely affect patient care. Implementing a DXA reporting template reduces major errors and should become common practice. Additional interventions, such as requiring initial and ongoing training and/or certification for technologists and interpreters, are suggested.

Could bioelectric impedance spectroscopy (BIS) measured appendicular intracellular water serve as a lean mass measurement in sarcopenia definitions? A pilot study

DXA lean mass measurement for sarcopenia diagnosis is not always possible. Bioelectric impedance spectroscopy (BIS), a portable technology, is a potential alternative to DXA-measured lean mass. This pilot study explores the possibility and proposes an arbitrarily chosen potential cut-point for appendicular intracellular water corrected by height (aICW/ht²).

INTRODUCTION

Sarcopenia definitions often include DXA lean mass measurement. However, DXA is not always available. We explored the potential of a less-expensive mobile method, bioelectric impedance spectroscopy (BIS), to assess lean mass for sarcopenia determination. We hypothesized that BIS-measured appendicular intracellular water (aICW/ht²) would correlate with DXA-measured appendicular lean mass (ALM)/ht² and with functional parameters. If so, establishing an aICW/ht² cut-point in sarcopenia definitions may be feasible.

METHODS

Sixty-one community-dwelling women, mean age 79.9, had BIS and DXA lean mass, grip strength, gait speed, and jumping mechanography assessments. BIS aICW was calculated using limb length and intracellular water resistance. aICW/ht² was compared to DXA-measured ALM/ht² by linear regression. The European Working Group ALM/ht² and an exploratory aICW/ht² cut-point were utilized.

RESULTS

In this cohort, ALM/ht² and aICW/ht² were moderately correlated, R² = 0.55, p < 0.0001. Lean mass was low in 7 and normal in 44 by BIS and DXA. Those with low aICW/ht² had lower grip strength (p = 0.04) and jump power (p = 0.0002) than those with normal aICW/ht² and ALM/ht². Subjects with low ALM/ht² had lower jump power (p = 0.0006) but were not different in gait speed or grip strength.

CONCLUSIONS

BIS aICW is correlated with DXA-measured ALM directly, and when height adjusted. An aICW/ht² cut-point of 6.5 L/m² identified 70% of women with low ALM/ht². Women with low lean mass by DXA and BIS had poorer function measured by jump power. These pilot data support further evaluation of BIS measurement inclusion into sarcopenia definitions.

Comparison of muscle/lean mass measurement methods: correlation with functional and biochemical testing

DXA-measured lean mass is often used to assess muscle mass but has limitations. Thus, we compared DXA lean mass with two novel methods-bioelectric impedance spectroscopy and creatine (methyl-d3) dilution. The examined methodologies did not measure lean mass similarly and the correlation with muscle biomarkers/function varied.

INTRODUCTION

Muscle function tests predict adverse health outcomes better than lean mass measurement. This may reflect limitations of current mass measurement methods. Newer approaches, e.g., bioelectric impedance spectroscopy (BIS) and creatine (methyl-d3) dilution (D3-C), may more accurately assess muscle mass. We hypothesized that BIS and D3-C measured muscle mass would better correlate with function and bone/muscle biomarkers than DXA measured lean mass.

METHODS

Evaluations of muscle/lean mass, function, and serum biomarkers were obtained in older community-dwelling adults. Mass was assessed by DXA, BIS, and orally administered D3-C. Grip strength, timed up and go, and jump power were examined. Potential muscle/bone serum biomarkers were measured. Mass measurements were compared with functional and serum data using regression analyses; differences between techniques were determined by paired t tests.

RESULTS

Mean (SD) age of the 112 (89F/23M) participants was 80.6 (6.0) years. The lean/muscle mass assessments were correlated (.57-.88) but differed (p < 0.0001) from one another with DXA total body less head being highest at 37.8 (7.3) kg, D3-C muscle mass at 21.1 (4.6) kg, and BIS total body intracellular water at 17.4 (3.5) kg. All mass assessment methods correlated with grip strength and jump power (R = 0.35-0.63, p < 0.0002), but not with gait speed or repeat chair rise. Lean mass measures were unrelated to the serum biomarkers measured.

CONCLUSIONS

These three methodologies do not similarly measure muscle/lean mass and should not be viewed as being equivalent. Functional tests assessing maximal muscle strength/power (grip strength and jump power) correlated with all mass measures whereas gait speed was not. None of the selected serum measures correlated with mass. Efforts to optimize muscle mass assessment and identify their relationships with health outcomes are needed.

Normative Values of Muscle Power using Force Plate Jump Tests in Men Aged 77-101 Years: The Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study

OBJECTIVE

To determine normative values for weight-bearing, countermovement leg extension ("jump") tests in the oldest men and characteristics of those not completing vs. completing tests.

DESIGN

2014-16 cross-sectional exam.

SETTING

Six U.S. sites from the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study.

PARTICIPANTS

Community-dwelling men (N=1,841) aged 84.5±4.2 (range: 77-101) years.

INTERVENTIONS

N/A.

MEASUREMENTS

Jump tests on a force plate measured lower-extremity muscle peak power/kg, velocity and force/kg at peak power, with normative values for 5-year age groups and by limitations in moderate-intensity activities of daily living (ADLs) and climbing several flights of stairs.

RESULTS

Jump completion was 68.9% (N=1,268/1,841) and 98% (1,242/1,268) had ≥1 analyzable trial/participant. Exclusions primarily were due to poor mobility and/or balance: 24.8% (456/1,841) prior to and 6.4% (N=117/1,841) after attempting testing. Peak power was 20.8±5.3 W/kg, with 1.2±0.3 m/s for velocity, and 16.7±1.9 N/kg for force at peak power. Each 5-year age group >80 years had subsequently 10% lower power/kg, with 30% lower power/kg at >90 vs. ≤80 years (all p<0.05). Velocity and force/kg at peak power were 24% and 9% lower respectively, at >90 vs. ≤80 years (all p<0.05). Limitations in both moderate ADLs and climbing several flights of stairs were associated with 16% lower age-adjusted power/kg, equivalent to 5-10 years of aging, with 11% and 6% lower age-adjusted velocity and force/kg respectively, vs. those without limitation (all p<0.05). Men not completing vs. completing jumps had older age, higher BMI, lower physical activity, more comorbidities, worse cognition, more IADLs/ADLs and more falls in the past year (all p<0.05). Post-jump pain occurred in 4.6% (58/1,268), with 2 participants stopping testing due to pain. Only 24/1,242 (2%) had all trials/participant without flight (i.e., inability to lift feet), with 323/1,242 having ≥1 trial/participant without flight (total of 28%). No serious adverse safety events (e.g., injury) occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

A multicenter cohort of oldest men with a range of function had higher declines in jump power/kg and velocity vs. force/kg across each 5-year age group >80 years. Future research should examine age- and functional-related declines in jump measures related to physical performance decline, falls, fractures, and disability.

Effect of age and sex on jumping mechanography and other measures of muscle mass and function

OBJECTIVES

Sarcopenia increases falls and fracture risk. Sarcopenia clinical trials require robust quantitative tools to evaluate muscle function; jumping mechanography (JM) is likely one such tool. However, US data comparing JM with traditional tests across the lifespan is limited. This study evaluated the effect of age and sex on JM compared with traditional function tests and lean mass.

METHODS

US adults (213 women/119 men; mean age 65.4 years, range 27-96) performed functional tests including JM, Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and grip strength (GS). Appendicular lean mass (ALM) was measured using DXA.

RESULTS

Men had higher relative jump power [mean (SD) 28.5 (10.52) vs. 21.9 (7.11) W/kg], GS [35.5 (9.84) vs. 22.7 (6.98) kg] and ALM/ht(2) [8.25 (1.35) vs. 6.99 (1.38) kg/m2] (all p<0.0001); no difference was observed for SPPB components. JM parameters were more strongly correlated with age than traditional tests (R2=0.38-0.61 vs. R2=0.01-0.28) and weakly with GS and chair rise time (R2=0.30-0.36).

CONCLUSION

JM parameters are correlated with GS and chair rise time and demonstrate stronger correlations with age. JM shows promise as a valuable tool to evaluate and monitor interventions for sarcopenia as it could potentially detect change in muscle function more precisely than existing tools.

Definitions of Sarcopenia: Associations with Previous Falls and Fracture in a Population Sample

Sarcopenia is common in later life and may be associated with adverse health outcomes such as disability, falls and fracture. There is no consensus definition for its diagnosis although diagnostic algorithms have been proposed by the European Working Group for Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP), the International Working Group on Sarcopenia (IWGS) and the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Sarcopenia Project (FNIH). More recently, Binkley and colleagues devised a score-based system for the diagnosis of "dysmobility syndrome" in an attempt to combine adverse musculoskeletal phenotypes, including sarcopenia and osteoporosis, in order to identify older individuals at particular risk. We applied these criteria to participants from the Hertfordshire Cohort Study to define their prevalence in an unselected cohort of UK community-dwelling older adults and assess their relationships with previous falls and fracture. Body composition and areal bone mineral density were measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, gait speed was determined by a 3-m walk test and grip strength was assessed with a Jamar hand-held dynamometer. Researcher-administered questionnaires were completed detailing falls and fracture history. The prevalence of sarcopenia in this cohort was 3.3, 8.3 and 2.0% using the EWGSOP, IWGS and related definition of FNIH, respectively; 24.8% of individuals had dysmobility syndrome. Individuals with dysmobility reported significantly higher number of falls (last year and since the age of 45 years) (p < 0.01) than those without it, but no increased fracture rate was observed in this group (p = 0.96). Those with sarcopenia as defined by the IWGS reported significantly higher falls in the last year and prevalent fractures (falls in the last year: OR 2.51; CI 1.09-5.81; p = 0.03; fractures OR 2.50; CI 1.05-5.92; p = 0.04) but these significant associations were not seen when the EWGSOP definition was applied. The IWGS definition of sarcopenia appears to be an effective means of identifying individuals at risk of prevalent adverse musculoskeletal events.

Reproducibility of jumping mechanography and traditional measures of physical and muscle function in older adults

SUMMARY

Improved approaches to assess functional change over time are needed to optimally reduce fall/fracture risk; jumping mechanography (JM) may be one such methodology. In this study, JM parameters were more reproducible than traditional functional tests. JM may be better able to demonstrate efficacy of interventions to mitigate sarcopenia.

INTRODUCTION

Jumping mechanography (JM), a tool using maximal countermovement jumps performed on a force plate, may more reliably assess muscle function than traditional methods. The purpose of this study was to examine JM retest reliability in older adults compared with commonly used muscle and physical function assessments.

METHODS

Community-dwelling individuals age≥70 years performed physical and muscle function assessments including the short physical performance battery (SPPB), grip strength, and JM on multiple occasions over 3 months. JM parameters included body weight-corrected peak power and jump height. Appendicular lean mass was measured by dual energy x-ray (DXA). Mixed effects linear regression models were used to estimate between- and within-person variability summarized as intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC).

RESULTS

Ninety-seven individuals (49 females, 48 males, mean age 80.7 years) participated. All testing was well tolerated; no participant sustained injury. Jump power, height, and grip strength were greater (p<0.0001) in men than women. Grip strength, jump power, and height had excellent ICCs (0.95, 0.93, and 0.88, respectively); chair rise, SPPB score, and gait speed had lower ICCs (0.81, 0.77, and 0.76, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In older adults, JM has excellent retest reliability, is stable over time, and can be performed safely. JM retest reliability was comparable to grip strength and possibly better than SPPB and gait speed. JM is a promising tool for muscle function assessment in older adults. Comparison of this approach with traditional assessment tools in longitudinal interventional studies is needed.

Myostatin--the holy grail for muscle, bone, and fat?

Myostatin, a member of the transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) superfamily, was first described in 1997. Since then, myostatin has gained growing attention because of the discovery that myostatin inhibition leads to muscle mass accrual. Myostatin not only plays a key role in muscle homeostasis, but also affects fat and bone. This review will focus on the impact of myostatin and its inhibition on muscle mass/function, adipose tissue and bone density/geometry in humans. Although existing data are sparse, myostatin inhibition leads to increased lean mass and 1 study found a decrease in fat mass and increase in bone formation. In addition, myostatin levels are increased in sarcopenia, cachexia and bed rest whereas they are increased after resistance training, suggesting physiological regulatory of myostatin. Increased myostatin levels have also been found in obesity and levels decrease after weight loss from caloric restriction. Knowledge on the relationship of myostatin with bone is largely based on animal data where elevated myostatin levels lead to decreased BMD and myostatin inhibition improved BMD. In summary, myostatin appears to be a key factor in the integrated physiology of muscle, fat, and bone. It is unclear whether myostatin directly affects fat and bone, or indirectly via muscle. Whether via direct or indirect effects, myostatin inhibition appears to increase muscle and bone mass and decrease fat tissue-a combination that truly appears to be a holy grail. However, at this time, human data for both efficacy and safety are extremely limited. Moreover, whether increased muscle mass also leads to improved function remains to be determined. Ultimately potential beneficial effects of myostatin inhibition will need to be determined based on hard outcomes such as falls and fractures.

What's in a name revisited: should osteoporosis and sarcopenia be considered components of "dysmobility syndrome?"

Sarcopenia and osteoporosis are age-related declines in the quantity and quality of muscle and bone respectively, with shared pathogeneses and adverse health consequences. Both absolute and relative fat excess, i.e., obesity and sarcopenic obesity, contribute to disability, falls, and fractures. Rather than focusing on a single component, i.e., osteoporosis, sarcopenia, or obesity, we realized that an opportunity exists to combine clinical factors, thereby potentially allowing improved identification of older adults at risk for disability, falls, and fractures. Such a combination could be termed dysmobility syndrome, analogous to the approach taken with metabolic syndrome. An arbitrary score-based approach to dysmobility syndrome diagnosis is proposed and explored in a small cohort of older adults. Further evaluation of such an approach in large population-based and prospective studies seems warranted.

Changes in lower extremity muscle function after 56 days of bed rest

Preservation of muscle function, known to decline in microgravity and simulation (bed rest), is important for successful spaceflight missions. Hence, there is great interest in developing interventions to prevent muscle-function loss. In this study, 20 males underwent 56 days of bed rest. Ten volunteers were randomized to do resistive vibration exercise (RVE). The other 10 served as controls. RVE consisted of muscle contractions against resistance and concurrent whole-body vibration. Main outcome parameters were maximal isometric plantar-flexion force (IPFF), electromyography (EMG)/force ratio, as well as jumping power and height. Measurements were obtained before and after bed rest, including a morning and evening assessment on the first day of recovery from bed rest. IPFF (−17.1%), jumping peak power (−24.1%), and height (−28.5%) declined ( P < 0.05) in the control group. There was a trend to EMG/force ratio decrease (−20%; P = 0.051). RVE preserved IPFF and mitigated the decline of countermovement jump performance (peak power −12.2%; height −14.2%). In both groups, IPFF was reduced between the two measurements of the first day of reambulation. This study indicates that bed rest and countermeasure exercises differentially affect the various functions of skeletal muscle. Moreover, the time course during recovery needs to be considered more thoroughly in future studies, as IPFF declined not only with bed rest but also within the first day of reambulation. RVE was effective in maintaining IPFF but only mitigated the decline in jumping performance. More research is needed to develop countermeasures that maintain muscle strength as well as other muscle functions including power.

Vertebral fracture assessment: impact of instrument and reader

PURPOSE

Many osteoporotic vertebral fractures are not clinically recognized but increase fracture risk. We hypothesized that a newer generation densitometer increases the number of evaluable vertebrae and vertebral fractures detected. We also explored the impact of reader experience on vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) interpretation.

METHODS

VFA images obtained using Prodigy and iDXA densitometers in 103 older adults were evaluated for vertebral visualization and fracture presence in the T4-L5 region. A "true" read for each densitometer was achieved by consensus. If readers disagreed, the evaluation of a third expert physician was taken as true. Main outcomes were evaluable vertebrae, vertebral fractures, and intrareader/interreader reproducibility.

RESULTS

Using the "true" reads, 92% of vertebrae were visualized on iDXA and 76% on Prodigy. Numerically, more fractures were identified with iDXA; the "true" reads found 43 fractures on iDXA and 21 on Prodigy. The experienced reader had better intrareader and interreader reproducibility than the inexperienced reader when compared with the "true" read.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the newer iDXA densitometer for VFA analysis improves vertebral body visualization and fracture detection. Training and experience enhance result reproducibility.