Clinical characteristics and risk factors associated with secondary bacterial pneumonia among COVID-19 patients in ICU

INTRODUCTION

COVID-19 and secondary infections developing during COVID-19 follow-up are one of the most important causes of morbidity and mortality in intensive care units (ICU). In this study, we aimed to determine the frequency, microbiology, risk factors, and outcomes of secondary bacterial pneumonia in hospitalized patients due to COVID-19.

METHODOLOGY

We studied all patients with bacterial pneumonia developed in patients with severe COVID-19 infection in the COVID-19 intensive care unit in a single-center hospital between March 16, 2020 and June 17, 2020. Patients hospitalized and followed up in the ICU for respiratory failure were examined in terms of secondary infection affecting morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

Ninety-six (20%) of 471 patients had secondary bacterial pneumonia, respectively; of the leading pathogens were Acinetobacter baumannii (44.8%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (39.6%), followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (4.2%), Escherichia coli (3.1%), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (3.1%), Streptococcus pneumoniae (3.1%), and Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) (1%). The mortality rate among infected (75% / 47.5%) was significantly higher than in uninfected patients. Associated with the development of secondary bacterial pneumonia in COVID-19 patients; corticosteroid therapy [odds ratio (OR) 6250, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.383-28.571, p = 0.017), corticosteroid dose (OR 8.862 CI 2.299-70.258, p= 0.006), duration of mechanical ventilation (OR 1.199 CI) 1.088-1.322, p< 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Secondary bacterial pneumonia was found to be associated with the severity and survival of the disease in patients admitted to ICU due to COVID-19. Duration of mechanical ventilation and use of corticosteroids and high-dose corticosteroids are risk factors for secondary bacterial pneumonia.

Factors associated with mortality in younger and older (≥75 years) hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia

BACKGROUND

Pneumonia is among the most serious infections in the elderly. The evaluation of prognosis and predicting the outcome is essential in managing the treatment of patients with pneumonia.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate factors that might affect the mortality of elderly patients hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in two age groups.

DESIGN

Medical record review.

SETTINGS

Tertiary care hospital.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included CAP patients who were hospitalized during the period from January 2017 and December 2019. The CURB-65 scale was chosen to assess the severity of pneumonia on admission. Multivariate analyses were conducted separately for patients younger than 75 years and 75 years or older.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

30-day mortality, factors associated with mortality.

SAMPLE SIZE AND CHARACTERISTICS

1603 patients with a median age of 74, including 918 women (57%).

RESULTS

The 30-day mortality rate was 6.5%. Patients with carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria had lower survival rates (P<.0001). In the multivariate analysis, age, lung cancer, CURB-65, carbapenem resistance, and duration of hospital stay were associated with mortality in patients aged 75 years or older. Lung cancer, malignant disease, carbapenem resistance, duration of hospital stay and procalcitonin level were associated with mortality under the age of 75. Of 640 sputum cultures tested, P aeruginosa (42%) was the most common pathogen.

CONCLUSION

The risk factors that affected mortality differed among patients aged 75 years or older versus younger patients. Our findings are important in determining factors associated with mortality in managing the treatment and follow up of hospitalized CAP patients younger or 75 years of age or older.

LIMITATIONS

Single-center, retrospective.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None.

COVID-19 and thrombosis: Prophylaxis and management

COVID-19 emerged in Wuhan, China in late December 2019, and WHO declared it a pandemic on March 11, 2020. The disease has a wide spectrum ranging from asymptomatic or mild disease to ARDS and death. There have been over 83.9 million cases with 1.8 million deaths worldwide. COVIDassociated coagulopathy appears to be an entity responsible for deaths. Thromboprophylaxis is recommended in patients with COVID-19 to prevent arterial and venous thromboembolism. Low molecular weight heparin such as enoxaparin is often recommended. However, there is still no consensus regarding the treatment dose and duration. The purpose of this review was to observe the pathogenesis of thromboembolic events in COVID-19, current thromboprophylaxis regimens, treatment dosage and duration with guidelines of international scientific institutions.

Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of adding ivermectin to treatment in severe COVID-19 patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

An effective treatment option is not yet available for SARS-CoV2, which causes the COVID-19 pandemic and whose effects are felt more and more every day. Ivermectin is among the drugs whose effectiveness in treatment has been investigated. In this study; it was aimed to investigate the presence of gene mutations that alter ivermectin metabolism and cause toxic effects in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia, and to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ivermectin use in the treatment of patients without mutation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with severe COVID19 pneumonia were included in the study, which was planned as a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind phase 3 study. Two groups, the study group and the control group, took part in the study. Ivermectin 200 mcg/kg/day for 5 days in the form of a solution prepared for enteral use added to the reference treatment protocol -hydroxychloroquine + favipiravir + azithromycin- of patients included in the study group. Patients in the control group were given only reference treatment with 3 other drugs without ivermectin. The presence of mutations was investigated by performing sequence analysis in the mdr1/abcab1 gene with the Sanger method in patients included in the study group according to randomization. Patients with mutations were excluded from the study and ivermectin treatment was not continued. Patients were followed for 5 days after treatment. At the end of the treatment and follow-up period, clinical response and changes in laboratory parameters were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 66 patients, 36 in the study group and 30 in the control group were included in the study. Mutations affecting ivermectin metabolism was detected in genetic tests of six (16.7%) patients in the study group and they were excluded from the study. At the end of the 5-day follow-up period, the rate of clinical improvement was 73.3% (22/30) in the study group and was 53.3% (16/30) in the control group (p = 0.10). At the end of the study, mortality developed in 6 patients (20%) in the study group and in 9 (30%) patients in the control group (p = 0.37). At the end of the follow-up period, the average peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) values of the study and control groups were found to be 93.5 and 93.0%, respectively. Partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2)/FiO2 ratios were determined as 236.3 ± 85.7 and 220.8 ± 127.3 in the study and control groups, respectively. While the blood lymphocyte count was higher in the study group compared to the control group (1698 ± 1438 and 1256 ± 710, respectively) at the end of the follow-up period (p = 0.24); reduction in serum C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin and D-dimer levels was more pronounced in the study group (p = 0.02, p = 0.005 and p = 0.03, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

According to the findings obtained, ivermectin can provide an increase in clinical recovery, improvement in prognostic laboratory parameters and a decrease in mortality rates even when used in patients with severe COVID-19. Consequently, ivermectin should be considered as an alternative drug that can be used in the treatment of COVID-19 disease or as an additional option to existing protocols.

Kounis Syndrome, a Cause of Chest Pain to Keep in Mind, May be Associated with E148Q Mutation

Chest pain is among the leading complaints in paediatric emergency. The Kounis syndrome is a rare allergic coronary vasospasm, which can cause angina and myocardial infarction. Even though organic causes are infrequent as a cause of chest pain in children, it is important to know when and how this symptom may become serious. We reported a patient who had been admitted with chest pain to the emergency department, hospitalised for coronary vasospasm and diagnosed to have Kounis syndrome and heterozygous E148Q mutation. The finding could be a coincidental finding, but considering of the heterogeneity and phenotypic differences in FMF, the relationship between E148Q mutation and Kounis syndrome should be explored further.

A cross sectional observational study on the influence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on activities of daily living: the COPD-Life study

INTRODUCTION

This study was designed to identify the impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) on activities of daily living, life styles and needs in patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Participants of this national, multi-centered, cross-sectional observational study included 497 stable COPD patients from 41 centers. The mean age (standard deviation; SD) was 63.3 (9.3) years with 59.0% of the patients under the age of 65, and 89.9% of the participants were male. Sociodemographic and COPD-related data were gathered at enrollment and during the 1-month telephone follow-up.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) COPD duration was 7.3 (6.5) years in the overall population while 5.4 (4.6) years for patients who recieved COPD diagnosis at least one year after the onset of symptoms. Dyspnea was the most common (83.1%) symptom and walking up stairs (66.6%) was the most difficult activity to be performed. Majority of the patients were aware of COPD as a chronic disease (63.4%), requiring ongoing treatment (79.7%), mainly caused by smoking (63.5%). 59% of the patients were under the age of 65 years-old. In 84% of patients, graduation from at least a primary school was identified. Results revealed an average number of two dependants that were obliged to look after per patient, ability to go on an outing in 91% of the patients, and going grocery shopping with ease in more than two-thirds of the study population. There was no significant difference in regular use of medication device across different educational or age groups. The top three COPD treatment expectations of the patients were being able to breathe (24.1%), walking (17.1%), and walking up stairs (11.7%), while shortness of breath (43.3%) was the first priority treatment need.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to the common view that COPD prevalance is higher in old age population, this study showed that the rate of the disease is higher among younger patients than expected; indispensability of out of the house activities in majority of patients; and use of regular medication device to be independent of educational level and the age of COPD patients. Our findings indicate that the likelihood of COPD patient population to be composed of younger and active individuals who do not spend majority of their time at home/in bed as opposed to popular belief. Therefore, availability of a portable and easy to use device for medication seems to be important to enhance daily living.