[Para-arortic lymhadenectomy and pelvic gynecological cancers: Extraperitoneal or transperitoneal laparoscopy?]

INTRODUCTION

Para-aortic lymphadenectomy plays a fundamental role in the surgical management of pelvic gynecological cancers. Two laparoscopic approaches exist: the transperitoneal (TP) and the extraperitoneal (EP). The aim of this study was to compare these 2 approaches in terms of surgical outcomes, specially the number of removed lymph nodes according to the surgical technique, and morbidity.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

A single-center retrospective study was carried out at the Lariboisiere University Hospital between January 2011 and March 2020 including all patients who underwent para-aortic lymphadenectomy for the management of a pelvic gynecological cancer (cervix, endometrium, ovary). Univariate and multivariate analysis (logistic regression) were performed to compare the TP and the EP groups.

RESULTS

143 patients were included: 74 in the TP group and 69 in the RP group. The total duration of surgery was 220.8minutes in the TP group and 166.4minutes in the EP group (P<0.001 in multivariate analysis). No significant difference between groups were found in the average total number of lymph nodes removed but there was a statistically significant difference in the average latero-aortic number of lymph nodes removed: 8.5 lymph nodes in the TP group and 11.3 lymph nodes in the group RP (P<0.001 in multivariate analysis). There was no difference between groups in peri and postoperative morbidity.

CONCLUSION

EP para-aortic lymphadenectomy reduces duration of surgery and increases the average latero-aortic number of lymph nodes removed with same morbidity compared to TP para-aortic lymphadenectomy, this confirming its preferred indication in endometrial and in cervical cancers.

Management of borderline ovarian tumours during pregnancy: Results of a French multi-centre study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the diagnostic and prognostic characteristics of borderline ovarian tumours (BOTs) detected during pregnancy, and to establish an inventory of French practices.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective multi-centre case study of 14 patients treated for BOTs, diagnosed during pregnancy between 2005 and 2017, in five French pelvic cancerology expert centres, including data on clinical characteristics, histological tumour characteristics, surgical procedure, adjuvant treatments, follow-up and fertility.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 29.3 [standard deviation (SD) 6.2] years. Most BOTs were diagnosed on ultrasonography in the first trimester (85.7 %), and most of these cases (78.5 %) also underwent magnetic resonance imaging to confirm the diagnosis (true positives 54.5 %). Most patients underwent surgery during pregnancy (57 %), with complete staging surgery in two cases (14.3 %). Laparoscopy was performed more frequently than other procedures (50 %), and unilateral adnexectomy was more common than cystectomy (57.5 %). Tumour size influenced the surgical approach significantly (mean size 7.5 cm for laparoscopy, 11.9 cm for laparoconversion, 14 cm for primary laparotomy; P = 0.08), but the type of resection did not. Most patients were initially diagnosed with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IA (92.8 %) tumours, but many were upstaged after complete restaging surgery (57.1 %). Most BOTs were serous (50 %), two cases had a micropapillary component (28.5 %), and one case had a micro-invasive implant. BOTs were bilateral in two cases (14.2 %). Mean follow-up was 31.4 (SD 14.8) months. Recurrent lesions occurred in two patients (14.2 %) and no deaths have been recorded to date among the study population.

CONCLUSION

BOTs remain rare, but this study - despite its small sample size - supports the hypothesis that BOTs during pregnancy have potentially aggressive characteristics.

Risk factors for recurrence of borderline ovarian tumors in France: A multicenter retrospective study by the FRANCOGYN group

INTRODUCTION

Borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) although rare, have shown an increase in the incidence worldwide. Although the survival rate is high, the recurrence rate is estimated to be between 5% and 34%. The objective of this study was to identify risk factors for recurrence of BOTs.

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter study included 493 patients treated surgically for BOT between January 2001 and December 2018.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients showed recurrence (group R, 7.5%), while 456 did not (group NR, 92.5%). With an average follow-up of 30.5 months (1-276), the overall recurrence rate was 7.5%. Recurrence rates for the BOT and invasive types were 5.7% (n = 28) and 1.4% (n = 7), respectively. The mean time to recurrence was 44.1 (3-251) months. Univariate analysis showed that age at diagnosis, type of surgical procedure, histological type, and FIGO stage were factors influencing recurrence. Multivariate analysis showed that the risk factors for recurrence of BOT were conservative treatment (OR = 7 [95% CI 3.01-16.23]; p < 0.05) and advanced FIGO stage (OR = 5.86 [95% CI 2.21-15.5]; p < 0.05).

DISCUSSION

To the best of our knowledge, this multicenter study was one of the largest studies on the risk factors for BOT recurrence. Conservative treatment and advanced FIGO stage were identified as risk factors for BOT recurrence. These results reinforce the need for restaging of patients who did not have an optimal initial surgical staging so as not to avoid missing a tumor in the advanced stage. Referral to a surgical oncology center is suggested to optimize overall patient management.

[Guidelines for surgical management of gynaecological cancer during pandemic COVID-19 period - FRANCOGYN group for the CNGOF]

INTRODUCTION

Recommendations for the management of patients with gynecological cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic period.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Recommendations based on the consensus conference model.

RESULTS

In the case of a COVID-19 positive patient, surgical management should be postponed for at least 15 days. For cervical cancer, the place of surgery must be re-evaluated in relation to radiotherapy and Radio-Chemotherapy-Concomitant and the value of lymph node staging surgeries must be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. For advanced ovarian cancers, neo-adjuvant chemotherapy should be favored even if primary cytoreduction surgery could be envisaged. It is lawful not to offer hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy during a COVID-19 pandemic. In the case of patients who must undergo interval surgery, it is possible to continue the chemotherapy and to offer surgery after 6 cycles of chemotherapy. For early stage endometrial cancer, in case of low and intermediate preoperative ESMO risk, hysterectomy with bilateral annexectomy associated with a sentinel lymph node procedure should be favored. It is possible to consider postponing surgery for 1 to 2 months in low-risk endometrial cancers (FIGO Ia stage on MRI and grade 1-2 endometrioid cancer on endometrial biopsy). For high ESMO risk, it ispossible to favor the MSKCC algorithm (combining PET-CT and sentinel lymph node biopsy) in order to omit pelvic and lumbar-aortic lymphadenectomies.

CONCLUSION

During COVID-19 pandemic, patients suffering from cancer should not lose life chance, while limiting the risks associated with the virus.

[Epidemiology of presumed benign ovarian tumors]

Ovarian cysts presumed benign can be organic or functional. Their prevalence is estimated between 14 and 18% in postmenopausal women and around 7% in asymptomatic women of childbearing age. Their incidence during pregnancy is between 0.2 and 5% and varies within the term of pregnancy. Ovarian cysts presumed benign have caused nearly 45,000 hospitalizations in France in 2012, bringing the annual risk of hospitalization for a woman residing in France to 1.3‰. Among the risk factors studied in the literature, tamoxifen increases the incidence of ovarian cysts in premenopausal patients and immunosuppressive treatments are associated with a high prevalence of benign ovarian cysts while estrogen contraception reduces the risk of developing functional cysts.

External validation of a nomogram predicting survival in men with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer

e16066

Background: Armstrong et al. (Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:6396–403) recently published a nomogram predicting the probability of survival in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer. The initial report showed a predictive accuracy of 0.69. So far, this nomogram was not yet externally validated. We validated this nomogram in a cohort of patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer participating in five phase II trials. Methods: In our institution, 84 patients received chemotherapy for metastatic symptomatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer from September 1999 to November 2006. Follow-up was stopped in March 2008 and median follow up for all patients was 15.7 month. 75% of patients received docetaxel based chemotherapy. At the time of inclusion, median age was 69.0 years, median PSA was 40ng/ml, 93% had known bone metastases and 19% had visceral metastases. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was used to estimate the predictive accuracy of the nomogram and calibration plots were used for comparison between predicted and observed probabilities. Results: Of all patients, median survival was 15.5 month. The nomogram predicted median survival was 19.9 month, overestimating the true survival by roughly 30%. The predictive accuracy of the predictions at 1 year, 2 years and 5 years was 0.76, 0.69 and 0.64, respectively. The calibration plots showed departures from ideal predictions at 1 year (up to 20% of over estimation of true survival) and 5 years ( up to 19% of under estimation of true survival), whereas the predictions at 2 years showed almost perfect calibrations. Conclusions: The Armstrong et al1 nomogram provides accurate survival predictions in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer. The current external validation of this nomogram provides evidence that the nomogram might generally be applied to those patients in daily practice.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.