7
|
Souza JP, Betran AP, Dumont A, de Mucio B, Gibbs Pickens CM, Deneux-Tharaux C, Ortiz-Panozo E, Sullivan E, Ota E, Togoobaatar G, Carroli G, Knight H, Zhang J, Cecatti JG, Vogel JP, Jayaratne K, Leal MC, Gissler M, Morisaki N, Lack N, Oladapo OT, Tunçalp Ö, Lumbiganon P, Mori R, Quintana S, Costa Passos AD, Marcolin AC, Zongo A, Blondel B, Hernández B, Hogue CJ, Prunet C, Landman C, Ochir C, Cuesta C, Pileggi-Castro C, Walker D, Alves D, Abalos E, Moises E, Vieira EM, Duarte G, Perdona G, Gurol-Urganci I, Takahiko K, Moscovici L, Campodonico L, Oliveira-Ciabati L, Laopaiboon M, Danansuriya M, Nakamura-Pereira M, Costa ML, Torloni MR, Kramer MR, Borges P, Olkhanud PB, Pérez-Cuevas R, Agampodi SB, Mittal S, Serruya S, Bataglia V, Li Z, Temmerman M, Gülmezoglu AM. A global reference for caesarean section rates (C-Model): a multicountry cross-sectional study. BJOG 2015; 123:427-36. [PMID: 26259689 PMCID: PMC4873961 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/27/2015] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Objective To generate a global reference for caesarean section (CS) rates at health facilities. Design Cross‐sectional study. Setting Health facilities from 43 countries. Population/Sample Thirty eight thousand three hundred and twenty‐four women giving birth from 22 countries for model building and 10 045 875 women giving birth from 43 countries for model testing. Methods We hypothesised that mathematical models could determine the relationship between clinical‐obstetric characteristics and CS. These models generated probabilities of CS that could be compared with the observed CS rates. We devised a three‐step approach to generate the global benchmark of CS rates at health facilities: creation of a multi‐country reference population, building mathematical models, and testing these models. Main outcome measures Area under the ROC curves, diagnostic odds ratio, expected CS rate, observed CS rate. Results According to the different versions of the model, areas under the ROC curves suggested a good discriminatory capacity of C‐Model, with summary estimates ranging from 0.832 to 0.844. The C‐Model was able to generate expected CS rates adjusted for the case‐mix of the obstetric population. We have also prepared an e‐calculator to facilitate use of C‐Model (www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_health/c-model/en/). Conclusions This article describes the development of a global reference for CS rates. Based on maternal characteristics, this tool was able to generate an individualised expected CS rate for health facilities or groups of health facilities. With C‐Model, obstetric teams, health system managers, health facilities, health insurance companies, and governments can produce a customised reference CS rate for assessing use (and overuse) of CS. Tweetable abstract The C‐Model provides a customized benchmark for caesarean section rates in health facilities and systems. The C‐Model provides a customized benchmark for caesarean section rates in health facilities and systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J P Souza
- Department of Social Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
| | - A P Betran
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - A Dumont
- Research Institute for Development, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, UMR 216, Paris, France
| | - B de Mucio
- Latin American Center for Perinatology, Women and Reproductive Health, (CLAP/WR), WHO Regional Office for the Americas, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - C M Gibbs Pickens
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - C Deneux-Tharaux
- Inserm U1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team, Center for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - E Ortiz-Panozo
- Center for Population Health Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico
| | - E Sullivan
- Faculty of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - E Ota
- Department of Health Policy, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - G Togoobaatar
- Department of Health Policy, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - G Carroli
- Centro Rosarino de Estudios Perinatales, Rosario, Argentina
| | - H Knight
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Office for Research and Clinical Audit, Lindsay Stewart R&D Centre, London, UK.,Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - J Zhang
- Ministry of Education-Shanghai Key Laboratory of Children's Environmental Health, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - J G Cecatti
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | - J P Vogel
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - K Jayaratne
- Family Health Bureau, Ministry of Health, Colombo, Sri Lanka
| | - M C Leal
- Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública (ENSP), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - M Gissler
- National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
| | - N Morisaki
- Department of Health Policy, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Paediatrics, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - N Lack
- Bayerische Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Qualitätssicherung in der Stationären Versorgung (BAQ), Bayerische Krankenhausgesellschaft, Munich, Germany
| | - O T Oladapo
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Ö Tunçalp
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - P Lumbiganon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
| | - R Mori
- Department of Health Policy, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - S Quintana
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
| | - A D Costa Passos
- Department of Social Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
| | - A C Marcolin
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
| | - A Zongo
- Research Institute for Development, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, UMR 216, Paris, France.,Direction de la santé de la famille, Ministère de la Santé, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
| | - B Blondel
- Inserm U1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team, Center for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - B Hernández
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - C J Hogue
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - C Prunet
- Inserm U1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team, Center for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - C Landman
- Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública (ENSP), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - C Ochir
- School of Public Health, Health Sciences University of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
| | - C Cuesta
- Centro Rosarino de Estudios Perinatales, Rosario, Argentina
| | - C Pileggi-Castro
- GLIDE Technical Cooperation and Research, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.,Department of Paediatrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
| | - D Walker
- Departments of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - D Alves
- Department of Social Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
| | - E Abalos
- Centro Rosarino de Estudios Perinatales, Rosario, Argentina
| | - Ecd Moises
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
| | - E M Vieira
- Department of Social Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
| | - G Duarte
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
| | - G Perdona
- Department of Social Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
| | - I Gurol-Urganci
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Office for Research and Clinical Audit, Lindsay Stewart R&D Centre, London, UK.,Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - K Takahiko
- Department of Health Policy, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - L Moscovici
- Department of Social Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.,GLIDE Technical Cooperation and Research, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
| | - L Campodonico
- Centro Rosarino de Estudios Perinatales, Rosario, Argentina
| | - L Oliveira-Ciabati
- Department of Social Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.,GLIDE Technical Cooperation and Research, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
| | - M Laopaiboon
- Department of Biostatistics and Demography, Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
| | - M Danansuriya
- Family Health Bureau, Ministry of Health, Colombo, Sri Lanka
| | - M Nakamura-Pereira
- Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública (ENSP), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - M L Costa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | - M R Torloni
- Department of Obstetrics, School of Medicine of São Paulo, São Paulo Federal University, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - M R Kramer
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - P Borges
- Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública (ENSP), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - P B Olkhanud
- School of Public Health, Health Sciences University of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
| | - R Pérez-Cuevas
- Social Protection and Health Division, Inter-American Development Bank, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - S B Agampodi
- Family Health Bureau, Ministry of Health, Colombo, Sri Lanka
| | - S Mittal
- Fortis Memorial Research Institute, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - S Serruya
- Latin American Center for Perinatology, Women and Reproductive Health, (CLAP/WR), WHO Regional Office for the Americas, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - V Bataglia
- Hospital Nacional de Itauguá, Itauguá, Paraguay
| | - Z Li
- Faculty of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - M Temmerman
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - A M Gülmezoglu
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Le Ray C, Prunet C, Deneux-Tharaux C, Goffinet F, Blondel B. [Robson classification: A tool for assessment of caesarean practices in France]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015; 44:605-13. [PMID: 25861856 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2014] [Revised: 01/27/2015] [Accepted: 02/11/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To give a description of caesarean rates in France in 2010 using Robson classification, to assess practices according to the level of care of the maternity units. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study population was the sample of the French National Perinatal Survey in 2010 (n=14,165). Data were stratified by the level of care of the maternity unit (1, 2 or 3). Women were classified in 12 groups according to Robson classification, using maternal characteristics and obstetrical history. In each level of care, we calculated for each group, its relative size, its crude caesarean rate and its contribution to the overall caesarean rate. RESULTS The overall rate of caesarean in 2010 in France was 20.8% in level 1, 21.1% in level 2 and 20.0% in level 3 maternity units. In the three levels, the main contributors to the overall caesarean rate were primiparous women in spontaneous labour (group 1; contribution: 3.5% in level 1 units, 2.2% in level 2 units, 2.7% in level 3 units) or with induced labour (group 2a; contribution: 2.9, 2.5 and 3.0%, respectively) and multiparous women with previous caesarean (group 5; contribution: 5.8, 5.3 and 6.0%, respectively). Premature singletons (group 10) contributed to 0.8% to the overall caesarean rate in level 1 units, 1.4% in level 2 units and 3.5% in level 3 units. CONCLUSION The Robson classification is easy to use. Each maternity unit can compare its rates with those of units with similar level, to find whether some groups of women have very high rates of caesarean sections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Le Ray
- Inserm UMR 1153, équipe de recherche en épidémiologie obstétricale, périnatale et pédiatrique (EPOPé), centre de recherche épidémiologie et statistique Sorbonne Paris Cité, DHU risques et grossesse, université Paris Descartes, 75014 Paris, France; Maternité Port-Royal, hôpital Cochin, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 53, avenue de l'Observatoire, 75014 Paris, France.
| | - C Prunet
- Inserm UMR 1153, équipe de recherche en épidémiologie obstétricale, périnatale et pédiatrique (EPOPé), centre de recherche épidémiologie et statistique Sorbonne Paris Cité, DHU risques et grossesse, université Paris Descartes, 75014 Paris, France
| | - C Deneux-Tharaux
- Inserm UMR 1153, équipe de recherche en épidémiologie obstétricale, périnatale et pédiatrique (EPOPé), centre de recherche épidémiologie et statistique Sorbonne Paris Cité, DHU risques et grossesse, université Paris Descartes, 75014 Paris, France
| | - F Goffinet
- Inserm UMR 1153, équipe de recherche en épidémiologie obstétricale, périnatale et pédiatrique (EPOPé), centre de recherche épidémiologie et statistique Sorbonne Paris Cité, DHU risques et grossesse, université Paris Descartes, 75014 Paris, France; Maternité Port-Royal, hôpital Cochin, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 53, avenue de l'Observatoire, 75014 Paris, France
| | - B Blondel
- Inserm UMR 1153, équipe de recherche en épidémiologie obstétricale, périnatale et pédiatrique (EPOPé), centre de recherche épidémiologie et statistique Sorbonne Paris Cité, DHU risques et grossesse, université Paris Descartes, 75014 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|