1
|
Hu LS, Yoon H, Eschbacher JM, Baxter LC, Dueck AC, Nespodzany A, Smith KA, Nakaji P, Xu Y, Wang L, Karis JP, Hawkins-Daarud AJ, Singleton KW, Jackson PR, Anderies BJ, Bendok BR, Zimmerman RS, Quarles C, Porter-Umphrey AB, Mrugala MM, Sharma A, Hoxworth JM, Sattur MG, Sanai N, Koulemberis PE, Krishna C, Mitchell JR, Wu T, Tran NL, Swanson KR, Li J. Accurate Patient-Specific Machine Learning Models of Glioblastoma Invasion Using Transfer Learning. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019; 40:418-425. [PMID: 30819771 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a5981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2018] [Accepted: 12/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE MR imaging-based modeling of tumor cell density can substantially improve targeted treatment of glioblastoma. Unfortunately, interpatient variability limits the predictive ability of many modeling approaches. We present a transfer learning method that generates individualized patient models, grounded in the wealth of population data, while also detecting and adjusting for interpatient variabilities based on each patient's own histologic data. MATERIALS AND METHODS We recruited patients with primary glioblastoma undergoing image-guided biopsies and preoperative imaging, including contrast-enhanced MR imaging, dynamic susceptibility contrast MR imaging, and diffusion tensor imaging. We calculated relative cerebral blood volume from DSC-MR imaging and mean diffusivity and fractional anisotropy from DTI. Following image coregistration, we assessed tumor cell density for each biopsy and identified corresponding localized MR imaging measurements. We then explored a range of univariate and multivariate predictive models of tumor cell density based on MR imaging measurements in a generalized one-model-fits-all approach. We then implemented both univariate and multivariate individualized transfer learning predictive models, which harness the available population-level data but allow individual variability in their predictions. Finally, we compared Pearson correlation coefficients and mean absolute error between the individualized transfer learning and generalized one-model-fits-all models. RESULTS Tumor cell density significantly correlated with relative CBV (r = 0.33, P < .001), and T1-weighted postcontrast (r = 0.36, P < .001) on univariate analysis after correcting for multiple comparisons. With single-variable modeling (using relative CBV), transfer learning increased predictive performance (r = 0.53, mean absolute error = 15.19%) compared with one-model-fits-all (r = 0.27, mean absolute error = 17.79%). With multivariate modeling, transfer learning further improved performance (r = 0.88, mean absolute error = 5.66%) compared with one-model-fits-all (r = 0.39, mean absolute error = 16.55%). CONCLUSIONS Transfer learning significantly improves predictive modeling performance for quantifying tumor cell density in glioblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L S Hu
- From the Department of Radiology (L.S.H., J.M.H., J.R.M., T.W., J.L.)
| | - H Yoon
- Arizona State University (H.Y., Y.X., L.W., T.W., J.L.), Tempe, Arizona
| | | | | | - A C Dueck
- Department of Biostatistics (A.C.D.), Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | | | | | - P Nakaji
- Neurosurgery (K.A.S., P.N., N.S.)
| | - Y Xu
- Arizona State University (H.Y., Y.X., L.W., T.W., J.L.), Tempe, Arizona
| | - L Wang
- Arizona State University (H.Y., Y.X., L.W., T.W., J.L.), Tempe, Arizona
| | | | - A J Hawkins-Daarud
- Precision Neurotherapeutics Lab (A.J.H.-D., K.W.S., P.R.J, B.R.B., K.R.S.)
| | - K W Singleton
- Precision Neurotherapeutics Lab (A.J.H.-D., K.W.S., P.R.J, B.R.B., K.R.S.)
| | - P R Jackson
- Precision Neurotherapeutics Lab (A.J.H.-D., K.W.S., P.R.J, B.R.B., K.R.S.)
| | - B J Anderies
- Department of Neurosurgery (B.J.A., B.R.B., R.S.Z., M.G.S., P.E.K., C.K., K.R.S.)
| | - B R Bendok
- Precision Neurotherapeutics Lab (A.J.H.-D., K.W.S., P.R.J, B.R.B., K.R.S.).,Department of Neurosurgery (B.J.A., B.R.B., R.S.Z., M.G.S., P.E.K., C.K., K.R.S.)
| | - R S Zimmerman
- Department of Neurosurgery (B.J.A., B.R.B., R.S.Z., M.G.S., P.E.K., C.K., K.R.S.)
| | - C Quarles
- Neuroimaging Research (C.Q.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | - M M Mrugala
- Department of Neuro-Oncology (A.B.P.-U., M.M.M., A.S.)
| | - A Sharma
- Department of Neuro-Oncology (A.B.P.-U., M.M.M., A.S.)
| | - J M Hoxworth
- From the Department of Radiology (L.S.H., J.M.H., J.R.M., T.W., J.L.)
| | - M G Sattur
- Department of Neurosurgery (B.J.A., B.R.B., R.S.Z., M.G.S., P.E.K., C.K., K.R.S.)
| | - N Sanai
- Neurosurgery (K.A.S., P.N., N.S.)
| | - P E Koulemberis
- Department of Neurosurgery (B.J.A., B.R.B., R.S.Z., M.G.S., P.E.K., C.K., K.R.S.)
| | - C Krishna
- Department of Neurosurgery (B.J.A., B.R.B., R.S.Z., M.G.S., P.E.K., C.K., K.R.S.)
| | - J R Mitchell
- From the Department of Radiology (L.S.H., J.M.H., J.R.M., T.W., J.L.).,H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute (J.R.M.), Tampa, Florida
| | - T Wu
- From the Department of Radiology (L.S.H., J.M.H., J.R.M., T.W., J.L.).,Arizona State University (H.Y., Y.X., L.W., T.W., J.L.), Tempe, Arizona
| | - N L Tran
- Department of Cancer Biology (N.L.T.), Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - K R Swanson
- Precision Neurotherapeutics Lab (A.J.H.-D., K.W.S., P.R.J, B.R.B., K.R.S.).,Department of Neurosurgery (B.J.A., B.R.B., R.S.Z., M.G.S., P.E.K., C.K., K.R.S.)
| | - J Li
- From the Department of Radiology (L.S.H., J.M.H., J.R.M., T.W., J.L.).,Arizona State University (H.Y., Y.X., L.W., T.W., J.L.), Tempe, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|