In antibody-positive first-degree relatives of patients with type 1 diabetes, HLA-A*24 and HLA-B*18, but not HLA-B*39, are predictors of impending diabetes with distinct HLA-DQ interactions

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Secondary type 1 diabetes prevention trials require selection of participants with impending diabetes. HLA-A and -B alleles have been reported to promote disease progression. We investigated whether typing for HLA-B*18 and -B*39 may complement screening for HLA-DQ8, -DQ2 and -A*24 and autoantibodies (Abs) against islet antigen-2 (IA-2) and zinc transporter 8 (ZnT8) for predicting rapid progression to hyperglycaemia.

METHODS

A registry-based group of 288 persistently autoantibody-positive (Ab(+)) offspring/siblings (aged 0-39 years) of known patients (Ab(+) against insulin, GAD, IA-2 and/or ZnT8) were typed for HLA-DQ, -A and -B and monitored from the first Ab(+) sample for development of diabetes within 5 years.

RESULTS

Unlike HLA-B*39, HLA-B*18 was associated with accelerated disease progression, but only in HLA-DQ2 carriers (p < 0.006). In contrast, HLA-A*24 promoted progression preferentially in the presence of HLA-DQ8 (p < 0.002). In HLA-DQ2- and/or HLA-DQ8-positive relatives (n = 246), HLA-B*18 predicted impending diabetes (p = 0.015) in addition to HLA-A*24, HLA-DQ2/DQ8 and positivity for IA-2A or ZnT8A (p ≤ 0.004). HLA-B*18 interacted significantly with HLA-DQ2/DQ8 and HLA-A*24 in the presence of IA-2 and/or ZnT8 autoantibodies (p ≤ 0.009). Additional testing for HLA-B*18 and -A*24 significantly improved screening sensitivity for rapid progressors, from 38% to 53%, among relatives at high Ab-inferred risk carrying at least one genetic risk factor. Screening for HLA-B*18 increased sensitivity for progressors, from 17% to 28%, among individuals carrying ≥ 3 risk markers conferring >85% 5 year risk.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

These results reinforce the importance of HLA class I alleles in disease progression and quantify their added value for preparing prevention trials.

Exploring the integration of the biomedical research component in undergraduate medical education

BACKGROUND

A task force of MEDINE (Thematic Network on Medical Education in Europe) organized a survey of European Medical Schools.

AIM

To investigate the link between education and biomedical research in the medical curriculum questioning university staff responsible for the curriculum.

METHOD

The survey was online between 10/2006 and 3/2007. Answers pertained to the situation in the academic year 2005/06.

RESULTS

Ninety-one medical schools/faculties in 26 countries participated, but response rates to some questions were lower due to incomplete responses. In undergraduate programs, 3/4 of the schools offer research courses and in 2/3 students can do research themselves. However, in most schools, fewer than 10% students choose this option. In about half the medical schools writing a thesis is a requirement for graduation, although the term "thesis" is interpreted broadly. Color map analysis revealed the link between medical education and biomedical research: about 25% of the medical schools had little emphasis on research in their undergraduate curriculum.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified the curriculum elements most suitable to improve the link between medical education and research for the initial stage (years 1-3) as literature search techniques, statistics and epidemiology, while for the advanced stage (years 4-6), writing a thesis was most relevant.

Validation of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for C-peptide analysis in Cameroon

AIMS

To validate an ELISA method for C-peptide analysis in Cameroon.

METHODS

We evaluated the linearity, detection limit, functional sensitivity, precision and accuracy, and further investigated for cross-reactivity by proinsulin, and interferences by lipids, bilirubin and hemoglobin. This method was compared with the Roche electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. C-peptide stability was assessed following a series of freeze-thaw cycles, and after storage at room temperature. The C-peptide reference range was determined by analyzing fifty plasma samples of Cameroonians without diabetes.

RESULTS

The ELISA was linear at least up to 7.09 μg/L, and had a detection limit of 0.09 μg/L, and a functional sensitivity of 0.32 μg/L. The inter- and intraassay %CV were 2.9-9.9%, and 5.2-9.4%, respectively. Recoveries were 81-94% in serum, and 93-98% in buffer. Comparison with the ECLIA yielded a good correlation coefficient (R(2)=0.98). There was no cross-reactivity with proinsulin, and no interference with lipids, bilirubin and hemoglobin. C-peptide was stable at room temperature for 24 h and up to 7 freeze-thaw cycles for medium (1-6 μg/L) and high (>6 μg/L) levels (<-15°C and <-70°C). The reference range for C-peptide was 0.38-3.63 μg/L.

CONCLUSIONS

This method is suitable for C-peptide analysis in low-income countries like Cameroon.

Molecular misreading: the occurrence of frameshift proteins in different diseases

Neuronal homoeostasis requires a constant balance between biosynthetic and catabolic processes. Eukaryotic cells primarily use two distinct mechanisms for degradation: the proteasome and autophagy of aggregates by the lysosomes. We focused on the UPS (ubiquitin-proteasome system). As a result of molecular misreading, misframed UBB (ubiquitin B) (UBB+1) is generated. UBB+1 accumulates in the neuritic plaques and neurofibrillary tangles in all patients with AD (Alzheimer's disease) and in the neuronal and glial hallmarks of other tauopathies and in polyglutamine diseases such as Huntington's disease. UBB+1 is not present in synucleinopathies such as Parkinson's disease. We showed that UBB+1 causes UPS dysfunction, aggregation and apoptotic cell death. UBB+1 is also present in non-neurological cells, hepatocytes of the diseased liver and in muscles during inclusion body myositis. Other frequently occurring (age-related) diseases such as Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus are currently under investigation. These findings point to the importance of the UPS in diseases and open new avenues for target identification of the main players of the UPS. Treatment of these diseases with tools (e.g. viral RNA interference constructs) to intervene with specific targets is the next step.