1
|
Burnell M, Gentry‐Maharaj A, Glazer C, Karpinskyj C, Ryan A, Apostolidou S, Kalsi J, Parmar M, Campbell S, Jacobs I, Menon U. Serial endometrial thickness and risk of non-endometrial hormone-dependent cancers in postmenopausal women in UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020; 56:267-275. [PMID: 31614036 PMCID: PMC7496247 DOI: 10.1002/uog.21894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2019] [Revised: 09/27/2019] [Accepted: 10/02/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Estrogen is a well-established risk factor for various cancers. It causes endometrial proliferation, which is assessed routinely as endometrial thickness (ET) using transvaginal ultrasound (TVS). Only one previous study, restricted to endometrial and breast cancer, has considered ET and the risk of non-endometrial cancer. The aim of this study was to explore the association between baseline and serial ET measurements and nine non-endometrial hormone-sensitive cancers, in postmenopausal women, using contemporary statistical methodology that attempts to minimize the biases typical of endogenous serial data. METHODS This was a cohort study nested within the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS). In the ultrasound arm of UKCTOCS, 50639 postmenopausal women, aged 50-74, underwent annual TVS examination, of whom 38 105 had a valid ET measurement, no prior hysterectomy and complete covariate data, and were included in this study. All women were followed up through linkage to national cancer registries. The effect of ET on the risk of six estrogen-dependent cancers (breast, ovarian, colorectal, bladder, lung and pancreatic) was assessed using joint models for longitudinal biomarker and time-to-event data, and Cox models were used to assess the association between baseline ET measurement and these six cancers in addition to liver cancer, gastric cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). All models were adjusted for current hormone-replacement therapy (HRT) use, body mass index, age at last menstrual period, parity and oral contraceptive pill use. RESULTS The 38 105 included women had a combined total of 267 567 (median, 8; interquartile range, 5-9) valid ET measurements. During a combined total of 407 838 (median, 10.9) years of follow-up, 1398 breast, 351 endometrial, 381 lung, 495 colorectal, 222 ovarian, 94 pancreatic, 79 bladder, 62 gastric, 38 liver cancers and 52 NHLs were registered. Using joint models, a doubling of ET increased significantly the risk of breast (hazard ratio (HR), 1.21; 95% CI, 1.09-1.36; P = 0.001), ovarian (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.06-1.82; P = 0.018) and lung (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.02-1.54; P = 0.036) cancers. There were no statistically significant associations between ET and the remaining six cancers. CONCLUSION Postmenopausal women with high/increasing ET on TVS are at increased risk of breast, ovarian and lung cancer. It is important that clinicians are aware of these risks, as TVS is a common investigation. © 2019 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Burnell
- MRC CTU, Institute of Clinical Trials and MethodologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - A. Gentry‐Maharaj
- MRC CTU, Institute of Clinical Trials and MethodologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - C. Glazer
- Department of Occupational and Environmental MedicineFrederiksberg‐Bispebjerg University HospitalCopenhagenNVDenmark
| | - C. Karpinskyj
- MRC CTU, Institute of Clinical Trials and MethodologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - A. Ryan
- MRC CTU, Institute of Clinical Trials and MethodologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - S. Apostolidou
- MRC CTU, Institute of Clinical Trials and MethodologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - J. Kalsi
- Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - M. Parmar
- MRC CTU, Institute of Clinical Trials and MethodologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | | | - I. Jacobs
- Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
| | - U. Menon
- MRC CTU, Institute of Clinical Trials and MethodologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wells AU, Flaherty KR, Brown KK, Inoue Y, Devaraj A, Richeldi L, Moua T, Crestani B, Wuyts WA, Stowasser S, Quaresma M, Goeldner RG, Schlenker-Herceg R, Kolb M, Aburto M, Acosta O, Andrews C, Antin-Ozerkis D, Arce G, Arias M, Avdeev S, Barczyk A, Bascom R, Bazdyrev E, Beirne P, Belloli E, Bergna M, Bergot E, Bhatt N, Blaas S, Bondue B, Bonella F, Britt E, Buch K, Burk J, Cai H, Cantin A, Castillo Villegas D, Cazaux A, Cerri S, Chaaban S, Chaudhuri N, Cottin V, Crestani B, Criner G, Dahlqvist C, Danoff S, Dematte D'Amico J, Dilling D, Elias P, Ettinger N, Falk J, Fernández Pérez E, Gamez-Dubuis A, Giessel G, Gifford A, Glassberg M, Glazer C, Golden J, Gómez Carrera L, Guiot J, Hallowell R, Hayashi H, Hetzel J, Hirani N, Homik L, Hope-Gill B, Hotchkin D, Ichikado K, Ilkovich M, Inoue Y, Izumi S, Jassem E, Jones L, Jouneau S, Kaner R, Kang J, Kawamura T, Kessler R, Kim Y, Kishi K, Kitamura H, Kolb M, Kondoh Y, Kono C, Koschel D, Kreuter M, Kulkarni T, Kus J, Lebargy F, León Jiménez A, Luo Q, Mageto Y, Maher T, Makino S, Marchand-Adam S, Marquette C, Martinez R, Martínez M, Maturana Rozas R, Miyazaki Y, Moiseev S, Molina-Molina M, Morrison L, Morrow L, Moua T, Nambiar A, Nishioka Y, Nunes H, Okamoto M, Oldham J, Otaola M, Padilla M, Park J, Patel N, Pesci A, Piotrowski W, Pitts L, Poonyagariyagorn H, Prasse A, Quadrelli S, Randerath W, Refini R, Reynaud-Gaubert M, Riviere F, Rodríguez Portal J, Rosas I, Rossman M, Safdar Z, Saito T, Sakamoto N, Salinas Fénero M, Sauleda J, Schmidt S, Scholand M, Schwartz M, Shapera S, Shlobin O, Sigal B, Silva Orellana A, Skowasch D, Song J, Stieglitz S, Stone H, Strek M, Suda T, Sugiura H, Takahashi H, Takaya H, Takeuchi T, Thavarajah K, Tolle L, Tomassetti S, Tomii K, Valenzuela C, Vancheri C, Varone F, Veeraraghavan S, Villar A, Weigt S, Wemeau L, Wuyts W, Xu Z, Yakusevich V, Yamada Y, Yamauchi H, Ziora D. Nintedanib in patients with progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases-subgroup analyses by interstitial lung disease diagnosis in the INBUILD trial: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial. Lancet Respir Med 2020; 8:453-460. [PMID: 32145830 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(20)30036-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 263] [Impact Index Per Article: 65.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Revised: 01/06/2020] [Accepted: 01/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The INBUILD trial investigated the efficacy and safety of nintedanib versus placebo in patients with progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). We aimed to establish the effects of nintedanib in subgroups based on ILD diagnosis. METHODS The INBUILD trial was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial done at 153 sites in 15 countries. Participants had an investigator-diagnosed fibrosing ILD other than IPF, with chest imaging features of fibrosis of more than 10% extent on high resolution CT (HRCT), forced vital capacity (FVC) of 45% or more predicted, and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLco) of at least 30% and less than 80% predicted. Participants fulfilled protocol-defined criteria for ILD progression in the 24 months before screening, despite management considered appropriate in clinical practice for the individual ILD. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 by means of a pseudo-random number generator to receive nintedanib 150 mg twice daily or placebo for at least 52 weeks. Participants, investigators, and other personnel involved in the trial and analysis were masked to treatment assignment until after database lock. In this subgroup analysis, we assessed the rate of decline in FVC (mL/year) over 52 weeks in patients who received at least one dose of nintedanib or placebo in five prespecified subgroups based on the ILD diagnoses documented by the investigators: hypersensitivity pneumonitis, autoimmune ILDs, idiopathic non-specific interstitial pneumonia, unclassifiable idiopathic interstitial pneumonia, and other ILDs. The trial has been completed and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02999178. FINDINGS Participants were recruited between Feb 23, 2017, and April 27, 2018. Of 663 participants who received at least one dose of nintedanib or placebo, 173 (26%) had chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, 170 (26%) an autoimmune ILD, 125 (19%) idiopathic non-specific interstitial pneumonia, 114 (17%) unclassifiable idiopathic interstitial pneumonia, and 81 (12%) other ILDs. The effect of nintedanib versus placebo on reducing the rate of FVC decline (mL/year) was consistent across the five subgroups by ILD diagnosis in the overall population (hypersensitivity pneumonitis 73·1 [95% CI -8·6 to 154·8]; autoimmune ILDs 104·0 [21·1 to 186·9]; idiopathic non-specific interstitial pneumonia 141·6 [46·0 to 237·2]; unclassifiable idiopathic interstitial pneumonia 68·3 [-31·4 to 168·1]; and other ILDs 197·1 [77·6 to 316·7]; p=0·41 for treatment by subgroup by time interaction). Adverse events reported in the subgroups were consistent with those reported in the overall population. INTERPRETATION The INBUILD trial was not designed or powered to provide evidence for a benefit of nintedanib in specific diagnostic subgroups. However, its results suggest that nintedanib reduces the rate of ILD progression, as measured by FVC decline, in patients who have a chronic fibrosing ILD and progressive phenotype, irrespective of the underlying ILD diagnosis. FUNDING Boehringer Ingelheim.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athol U Wells
- National Institute for Health Research Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Kevin R Flaherty
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Kevin K Brown
- Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Yoshikazu Inoue
- Clinical Research Center, National Hospital Organization Kinki-Chuo Chest Medical Center, Sakai City, Osaka, Japan
| | - Anand Devaraj
- Department of Radiology, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Luca Richeldi
- Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Teng Moua
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Bruno Crestani
- Université de Paris, Inserm U1152, APHP, Hôpital Bichat, Centre de reference constitutif pour les maladies pulmonaires rares, Paris, France
| | - Wim A Wuyts
- Unit for Interstitial Lung Diseases, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Manuel Quaresma
- Boehringer Ingelheim International, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany
| | | | | | - Martin Kolb
- McMaster University and St Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gentry-Maharaj A, Karpinskyj C, Glazer C, Burnell M, Bailey K, Apostolidou S, Ryan A, Lanceley A, Fraser L, Jacobs I, Hunter MS, Menon U. Prevalence and predictors of complementary and alternative medicine/non-pharmacological interventions use for menopausal symptoms within the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening. Climacteric 2017; 20:240-247. [PMID: 28326899 PMCID: PMC5448394 DOI: 10.1080/13697137.2017.1301919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2016] [Revised: 01/26/2017] [Accepted: 02/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The negative publicity about menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) has led to increased use of complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) and non-pharmacological interventions (NPI) for menopausal symptom relief. We report on the prevalence and predictors of CAM/NPI among UK postmenopausal women. METHOD Postmenopausal women aged 50-74 years were invited to participate in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS). A total of 202 638 women were recruited and completed a baseline questionnaire. Of these, 136 020 were sent a postal follow-up-questionnaire between September 2006 and May 2009 which included ever-use of CAM/NPI for menopausal symptom relief. Both questionnaires included MHT use. RESULTS A total of 88 430 (65.0%) women returned a completed follow-up-questionnaire; 22 206 (25.1%) reported ever-use of one or more CAM/NPI. Highest use was reported for herbal therapies (43.8%; 9725/22 206), vitamins (42.6%; 9458/22 206), lifestyle approaches (32.1%; 7137/22 206) and phytoestrogens (21.6%; 4802/22 206). Older women reported less ever-use of herbal therapies, vitamins and phytoestrogens. Lifestyle approaches, aromatherapy/reflexology/acupuncture and homeopathy were similar across age groups. Higher education, Black ethnicity, MHT or previous oral contraceptive pill use were associated with higher CAM/NPI use. Women assessed as being less hopeful about their future were less likely to use CAM/NPI. CONCLUSION One in four postmenopausal women reported ever-use of CAM therapies/NPI for menopausal symptom relief, with lower use reported by older women. Higher levels of education and previous MHT use were positive predictors of CAM/NPI use. UKCTOCS Trial registration: ISRCTN22488978.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Gentry-Maharaj
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - C. Karpinskyj
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - C. Glazer
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College LondonLondonUK
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Bispebjerg - Frederiksberg Hospital, Institute of Public Health, University of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| | - M. Burnell
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - K. Bailey
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - S. Apostolidou
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - A. Ryan
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - A. Lanceley
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - L. Fraser
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - I. Jacobs
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College LondonLondonUK
- UNSW AustraliaSydneyAustralia
- Centre for Women's Health, Institute of Human Development, University of ManchesterManchesterUK
| | - M. S. Hunter
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Guy’s Campus, King's College LondonLondonUK
| | - U. Menon
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|