Impact of sex on the assessment of the microvascular resistance reserve

BACKGROUND

The microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) is an innovative index to assess the vasodilatory capacity of the coronary circulation while accounting for the presence of concomitant epicardial disease. The MRR has shown to be a valuable diagnostic and prognostic tool in the general coronary artery disease (CAD) population. However, considering the fundamental aspects of its assessment and the unique hemodynamic characteristics of women, it is crucial to provide additional considerations for evaluating the MRR specifically in women.

AIM

The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic and prognostic applicability of the MRR in women and assess the potential differences across different sexes.

METHODS

From the ILIAS Registry, we enrolled all patients with a stable indication for invasive coronary angiography, ensuring complete physiological and follow-up data. We analyzed the diagnostic value by comparing differences between sexes and evaluated the prognostic value of the MRR specifically in women, comparing it to that in men.

RESULTS

A total of 1494 patients were included of which 26% were women. The correlation between MRR and CFR was good and similar between women (r = 0.80, p < 0.005) and men (r = 0.81, p < 0.005). The MRR was an independent and important predictor of MACE in both women (HR 0.67, 0.47-0.96, p = 0.027) and men (HR 0.84, 0.74-0.95, p = 0.007). The optimal cut-off value for MRR in women was 2.8 and 3.2 in men. An abnormal MRR similarly predicted MACE at 5-year follow-up in both women and men.

CONCLUSION

The MRR seems to be equally applicable in both women and men with stable coronary artery disease.

Clinical implementation of a fully automated quantitative perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging workflow with a simplified dual-bolus contrast administration scheme

This study clinically implemented a ready-to-use quantitative perfusion (QP) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (QP CMR) workflow, encompassing a simplified dual-bolus gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) administration scheme and fully automated QP image post-processing. Twenty-five patients with suspected obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) underwent both adenosine stress perfusion CMR and an invasive coronary angiography or coronary computed tomography angiography. The dual-bolus protocol consisted of a pre-bolus (0.0075 mmol/kg GBCA at 0.5 mmol/ml concentration + 20 ml saline) and a main bolus (0.075 mmol/kg GBCA at 0.5 mmol/ml concentration + 20 ml saline) at an infusion rate of 3 ml/s. The arterial input function curves showed excellent quality. Stress MBF ≤ 1.84 ml/g/min accurately detected obstructive CAD (area under the curve 0.79; 95% Confidence Interval: 0.66 to 0.89). Combined visual assessment of color pixel QP maps and conventional perfusion images yielded a diagnostic accuracy of 84%, sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 93%. The proposed easy-to-use dual-bolus QP CMR workflow provides good image quality and holds promise for high accuracy in diagnosis of obstructive CAD. Implementation of this approach has the potential to serve as an alternative to current methods thus increasing the accessibility to offer high-quality QP CMR imaging by a wide range of CMR laboratories.

Comparison of the Diagnostic Yield of Intracoronary Acetylcholine Infusion and Acetylcholine Bolus Injection Protocols During Invasive Coronary Function Testing

Coronary endothelial dysfunction (CED) and coronary artery spasm (CAS) are causes of angina with no obstructive coronary arteries in patients. Both can be diagnosed by invasive coronary function testing (ICFT) using acetylcholine (ACh). This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic yield of a 3-minute ACh infusion as compared with a 1-minute ACh bolus injection protocol in testing CED and CAS. We evaluated 220 consecutive patients with angina and no obstructive coronary arteries who underwent ICFT using continuous Doppler flow measurements. Per protocol, 110 patients were tested using 3-minute infusion, and thereafter 110 patients using 1-minute bolus injections, because of a protocol change. CED was defined as a <50% increase in coronary blood flow or any epicardial vasoconstriction in reaction to low-dose ACh and CAS according to the Coronary Vasomotor Disorders International Study Group (COVADIS) criteria, both with and without T-wave abnormalities, in reaction to high dose ACh. The prevalence of CED was equal in both protocols (78% vs 79%, p = 0.869). Regarding the endotypes of CAS according to COVADIS, the equivocal endotype was diagnosed less often in the 3 vs 1-minute protocol (24% vs 44%, p = 0.004). Including T-wave abnormalities in the COVADIS criteria resulted in a similar diagnostic yield of both protocols. Hemodynamic changes from baseline to the low or high ACh doses were comparable between the protocols for each endotype. In conclusion, ICFT using 3-minute infusion or 1-minute bolus injections of ACh showed a similar diagnostic yield of CED. When using the COVADIS criteria, a difference in the equivocal diagnosis was observed. Including T-wave abnormalities as a diagnostic criterion reclassified equivocal test results into CAS and decreased this difference. For clinical practice, we recommend the inclusion of T-wave abnormalities as a diagnostic criterion for CAS and the 1-minute bolus protocol for practicality.

Sex differences in prevalence and outcomes of the different endotypes of chronic coronary syndrome in symptomatic patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography: Insights from the global ILIAS invasive coronary physiology registry

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The management of chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) is informed by studies predominantly including men. This study investigated the relationship between patients sex and different endotypes of CCS, including sex-specific clinical outcomes.

METHODS

In patients with CCS undergoing coronary angiography, invasive Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) and Coronary Flow Reserve (CFR) were measured. Patients were stratified into groups: 1) obstructive coronary artery disease (oCAD) (FFR≤0.80, no revascularization), 2) undergoing revascularization, 3) non-obstructive coronary artery disease with coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) (FFR>0.80, CFR≤2.5), and 4) non-obstructive coronary artery disease without CMD (FFR>0.80 and CFR>2.5).

RESULTS

1836 patients (2335 vessels) were included, comprising 1359 (74.0%) men and 477 (26.0%) women. oCAD was present in 14.1% and was significantly less prevalent in women than in men (10.3% vs 15.5%, respectively p < 0.01). Revascularization was present in 30.9% and was similarly prevalent in women and men (28.2% vs. 31.9%, respectively p = 0.13). CMD was present in 24.2% and was significantly more prevalent in women than men (28.6% vs 22.6%, respectively p < 0.01). Normal invasive measurements were found in 564 patients (33.0% women vs 30.0% men, p = 0.23). Male sex was associated with an increased risk of target vessel failure compared to women (HR.1.89, 95% CI 1.12-3.18, p = 0.018), regardless of CCS-endotype.

CONCLUSIONS

Sex differences exist in the prevalence and outcomes of different endotypes of CCS in symptomatic patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography. In particular, oCAD (and subsequent revascularization) were more prevalent in men. Conversely, CMD was more prevalent in women. Overall, men experienced a worse cardiovascular outcome compared to women, independent of any specific CCS endotype.

Post-spastic flow recovery time to document vasospasm induced ischemia during acetylcholine provocation testing

Background

Intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh) provocation is an established method for diagnosing epicardial and microvascular vasospasm in contemporary clinical practice. We hypothesize that ACh-induced vasospasm is followed by post-spastic reactive hyperemia (PSRH), which is measured as an increased flow-recovery time.

Objectives

To assess flow-recovery time, indicative of ischemia, among the diagnostic endotypes that follow ACh provocation testing.

Methods

Patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary artery disease on angiography who underwent ACh provocation testing were included in this analysis. Doppler flow was continuously measured during the procedure and used to determine the flow-recovery time, which was calculated as time between cessation of ACh infusion and the point of flow recovery.

Results

Conventional provocation testing according to the COVADIS criteria diagnosed vasospasm in 63%(77/123), an equivocal result in 22%(27/123) and a negative result in 15%(19/123) of patients. In reaction to the highest-dose of ACh, flow-recovery time was significantly extended and similar in the epicardial, microvascular and equivocal test results compared to the negative result (all p < 0.001) indicative of PSRH.

Conclusion

Flow-recovery time in patients with an equivocal result is similar to patients with vasospasm, which indicates the occurrence of myocardial ischemia and therefore, these patients may benefit from medical treatment.

Meta-analysis and systematic review of coronary vasospasm in ANOCA patients: Prevalence, clinical features and prognosis

Background

Coronary artery spasm (CAS), encompassing epicardial and microvascular spasm, is increasingly recognized as cause of angina in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA). However, various spasm provocation testing protocols and diagnostic criteria are used, making diagnosis and characterization of these patients difficult and interpretation of study results cumbersome. This review provides a structured overview of the prevalence, characterization and prognosis of CAS worldwide in men and women.

Methods

A systematic review identifying studies describing ANOCA patients with CAS was performed. Multiple outcomes (prevalence, clinical features, and prognosis) were assessed. Data, except for prognosis were pooled and analysed using random effects meta-analysis models.

Results

Twenty-five publications (N = 14.554) were included (58.2 years; 44.2% women). Percentages of epicardial constriction to define epicardial spasm ranged from >50% to >90%. Epicardial spasm was prevalent in 43% (range 16-73%), with a higher prevalence in Asian vs. Western World population (52% vs. 33%, p = 0.014). Microvascular spasm was prevalent in 25% (range 7-39%). Men were more likely to have epicardial spasm (61%), women were more likely to have microvascular spasm (64%). Recurrent angina is frequently reported during follow-up ranging from 10 to 53%.

Conclusion

CAS is highly prevalent in ANOCA patients, where men more often have epicardial spasm, women more often have microvascular spasm. A higher prevalence of epicardial spasm is demonstrated in the Asian population compared to the Western World. The prevalence of CAS is high, emphasizing the use of unambiguous study protocols and diagnostic criteria and highlights the importance of routine evaluation of CAS in men and women with ANOCA.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=272100.

Sex-differences in prevalence and outcomes of the different endotypes of chronic coronary syndrome – analysis from the multi-center international ILIAS Registry

Introduction

Guideline-directed management of chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) remains focused on obstructive causes of angina, and is based on established therapies derived from studies predominantly including men. This occurs despite documented higher mortality from cardiovascular causes in women compared to men, which is hypothesized to be related to a higher prevalence of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) in women. However, data on the relationship between sex, the different endotypes of CCS, and related sex-specific clinical outcomes are limited.

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between sex and the different endotypes of CCS, as well as sex-specific clinical outcomes of CCS endotypes.

Method

In patients with stable angina undergoing coronary angiography, the following invasive coronary hemodynamics were characterized: fractional flow reserve (FFR; &lt;0.80 considered abnormal), coronary flow reserve (CFR; &lt;2.0 considered abnormal) and microcirculatory resistance (MR) (hyperemic microvascular resistance; &gt;2.5mmHg/cm/sec or index of microvascular resistance &gt;25 considered abnormal). Patients were stratified into three groups: 1) hemodynamically significant obstructive coronary artery disease (oCAD) (FFR abnormal or a severe coronary stenosis requiring revascularization), 2) no-obstructive coronary artery disease but with CMD (FFR normal, but abnormal CFR and/or MR), or 3) no-obstructive coronary artery disease and no CMD (FFR normal, and normal CFR and MR). We assessed the prevalence of the CCS endotypes across sex, and sex-specific cardiovascular outcomes over a follow-up of 7 years defined as the composite endpoint of death or acute myocardial infarction.

Results

Amongst a total of 1987 included patients, 1435 (72.2%) were men and 552 (27.8%) were women. oCAD occurred in 904 (45.5%) patients, which was significantly more prevalent in men (48.9% (701/1435) of men vs. 36.8% (203/552) of women, p&lt;0.001). In contrast, CMD was significantly more prevalent in women (19.6% (281/1435) of men vs. 24.1% (133/552) of women, p=0.031). Across the population, either oCAD or CMD occurred in 68.4% of men versus 60.9% of women (p=0.002). There were no sex-specific differences in cardiovascular outcomes across CCS entities (Figure 1).

Conclusion

In patients evaluated for CCS who underwent clinically indicated coronary angiography and physiological assessment, men were more likely to have oCAD and women were more likely to be classified as CMD. There were no sex-related differences in the prognosis associated with the individual CCS endotypes. Therefore, pathophysiological changes in the coronary circulation potentially underlying angina pectoris are similarly prevalent in men and women, but the high incidence of CMD in women makes women prone to underdiagnosis if no additional physiological measurements are assessed.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Presence of Coronary Endothelial Dysfunction, Coronary Vasospasm, and Adenosine-Mediated Vasodilatory Disorders in Patients With Ischemia and Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries

BACKGROUND

Coronary function testing in patients with ischemia and nonobstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) commonly includes assessment of adenosine-mediated vasodilation and acetylcholine spasm provocation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of additional endothelial function testing for the diagnosis of vasomotor dysfunction in patients with INOCA.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we included patients with INOCA who underwent clinically indicated comprehensive coronary function testing. Endothelial dysfunction was defined as a <50% increase in coronary blood flow, determined by Doppler flow, and/or epicardial vasoconstriction compared to baseline, in response to low-dose acetylcholine. Coronary artery spasm (CAS) was defined as vasospastic angina or microvascular angina in response to coronary high-dose acetylcholine. An impaired adenosine-mediated vasodilation was defined as a coronary flow reserve <2.5 and/or hyperemic microvascular resistance ≥2.5.

RESULTS

Among all 110 patients, 79% had endothelial dysfunction, 62% had CAS, and 29% had an impaired adenosine-mediated vasodilation. Endothelial dysfunction was present in 80% of patients who tested positively for CAS and/or an impaired adenosine-mediated vasodilation. Endothelial function testing increases the diagnostic yield of coronary function testing that only incorporates adenosine testing and spasm provocation by 17% to 92%. Of patients with normal adenosine-mediated vasodilation and no inducible CAS, 68% had endothelial dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant endothelial dysfunction was prevalent in the vast majority of patients with INOCA with inducible CAS and/or an impaired adenosine-mediated vasodilation. In patients with INOCA without inducible CAS and normal adenosine-mediated vasodilation, two-thirds had endothelial dysfunction. These results indicate the relevance to perform endothelial function testing in patients with INOCA in view of its therapeutic implication.

Reduced Microvascular Blood Volume as a Driver of Coronary Microvascular Disease in Patients With Non-obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: Rationale and Design of the MICORDIS Study

Background: Ischemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) is part of the ischemic heart disease spectrum, and is particularly observed in women. INOCA has various mechanisms, such as coronary vasospasm and coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). A decreased coronary flow reserve (CFR) and-or increased myocardial resistance (MR) are commonly used to diagnose CMD. However, CFR and MR do not describe all pathophysiological mechanisms underlying CMD. Increased myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2) normally increases myocardial blood volume (MBV), independently from myocardial blood flow (MBF). In addition insulin enhances MBV in healthy skeletal muscle, and this effect is impaired in INOCA-related conditions such as diabetes and obesity. Therefore, we propose that MBV is reduced in INOCA patients.

Aim: To assess whether myocardial blood volume (MBV) is decreased in INOCA patients, at baseline, during hyperinsulinemia and during stress.

Design: The MICORDIS-study is a single-center observational cross-sectional cohort study (identifier NTR7515). The primary outcome is MBV, compared between INOCA patients and matched healthy controls. The patient group will undergo coronary function testing using a Doppler guidewire, intracoronary adenosine and acetylcholine to measure CFR and coronary vasospasm. Both the patient- and the control group will undergo myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) to determine MBV at baseline, during hyperinsulinemia and during stress. Subsequently, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) will be evaluated as a new and noninvasive diagnostic tool for CMD in INOCA patients. Microvascular endothelial function is a determinant of MBV and will be evaluated by non-invasive microvascular function testing using EndoPAT and by measuring NO production in circulating endothelial cells (ECFCs).

Simultaneous intracoronary testing for endothelial dysfunction and coronary vasospasm in patient with angina and non-obstructive coronary artery disease

Introduction

Currently, two different theories exist on testing for coronary functional disorders in patients with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) where either invasive testing for endothelial function or coronary spasm provocation is performed. In this study we aim to assess the concomitant occurrence of both conditions in a cohort of patients with ANOCA undergoing both endothelial function testing and spasm provocation.

Methods

In this retrospective study, we included 114 patients that have undergone invasive coronary vasomotor function testing for coronary endothelial function and coronary artery spasm provocation. Endothelial dysfunction was defined as a &lt;50% increase in coronary blood flow and/or epicardial coronary diameter reduction compared to baseline in reaction coronary acetylcholine concentrations up to 10–6 mol/L. Coronary artery spasm (CAS), defined as VSA and/or MVA due to microvascular spasm, was defined according to the COVADIS criteria in reaction to coronary acetylcholine concentration up to 10–5 mol/L.

Results

Among the 114 patients, 90 (78%) could be diagnosed with endothelial dysfunction and 71 (62%) with CAS. In most patients, 60 (54%), endothelial dysfunction and CAS can be diagnosed concurrently, whereas only 30 had endothelial dysfunction without CAS and 11 patients had CAS with a normal endothelial function.

Conclusion

In this cohort of ANOCA patients undergoing testing for coronary endothelial function and spasm provocation a large overlap of concurrent endothelial dysfunction and spasm provocation was found. These findings suggest a role for simultaneous endothelial function testing and spasm provocation in coronary vasomotor function protocols in order to adequately identify endotypes of ANOCA.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.