Cost-effectiveness of CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy versus autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in first relapse

7537

Background: The recently reported ZUMA-7 and TRANSFORM trials demonstrate superior event-free survival among patients with primary refractory or early relapsed DLBCL compared to salvage chemotherapy with ASCT. However, given a cost of >$370,000, it is not known whether second-line CAR-T is cost-effective compared to ASCT. Thus, we developed a state-transition microsimulation model to simulate clinical outcomes and costs associated with therapy for DLBCL patients in first relapse, using ZUMA-7 and TRANSFORM data. Methods: The model begins at initiation of second-line therapy comparing salvage chemotherapy with ASCT or CAR-T therapy. We examined a three-year time horizon, including crossover to the alternative strategy therapy in the third line, as well as subsequent lines of therapy, using open-source Amua 0.3.0 software. Base case analysis was performed using 1000 first-order Monte Carlo simulations and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) was performed with 1000 simulations to test model uncertainty. Conditional probabilities of survival and disease progression were extracted from Kaplan-Meier curves from pivotal clinical trials using the WebPlotDigitizer tool. Costs were estimated from public sources in US Dollars ($) and effects were estimated in quality-adjusted life years (QALY) using published utility values. Results: Median overall survival was 15 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 13-19 months) with ASCT and 21 months (95% CI 17-29 months) with CAR-T. The PSA demonstrated costs and effectiveness per patient of $243,581 and 1.06 QALYs with ASCT and $470,150 and 1.22 QALYs with CAR-T with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $1,383,320/QALY. Incremental net monetary benefit of CAR-T versus ASCT, based on a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $200,000/QALY, was -$193,812. The break-even price for CAR-T and all subsequent therapies, based on a one-way sensitivity analysis, was $170,489. Conclusions: The model demonstrated improved survival and QALYs for the second-line CAR-T therapy, but was not cost-effective, as the ICER exceeded $1,000,000/QALY, which is higher than most accepted WTP thresholds. A limitation of these early data is that they only assess outcomes over three years. To estimate the full effect of these therapies, we will extrapolate the Kaplan-Meier curves for additional analyses. Clinical outcomes of second-line CAR-T are promising, but prices would need to be considerably lower to enable equitable access and affordability.[Table: see text]

Clinical and patient (pt)-reported outcomes (PROs) in a phase 3, randomized, open-label study evaluating axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) versus standard-of-care (SOC) therapy in elderly pts with relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL; ZUMA-7)

7548

Background: Elderly pts with R/R LBCL are at risk of inferior outcomes, increased toxicity, and inability to tolerate second-line (2L) SOC treatment (Tx) (Di M, et al. Oncologist. 2021). Further 2L SOC Tx is often associated with poor health-related quality of life (QoL) (Lin V, et al. J Clin Oncol . 2020;38:e20070). In the pivotal Phase 3 ZUMA-7 study, we assessed outcomes, including PROs, of 2L axi-cel (an autologous anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy) versus SOC in elderly pts with R/R LBCL. Methods: Pts aged ≥65 y were assessed in a planned subgroup analysis. Pts with ECOG PS 0-1 and R/R LBCL ≤12 mo after 1L chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) were randomized 1:1 to axi-cel or SOC (2-3 cycles of platinum-based CIT; pts with partial or complete response [CR] proceeded to HDT-ASCT). PRO instruments, including the EORTC QLQ-C30 (Global Health [GH] and Physical Functioning [PF]) and the EQ-5D-5L VAS, were administered at timepoints including baseline (BL; prior to Tx), Day (D) 50, D100, D150, and Month (M) 9, then every 3 mo up to 24 mo or time of event-free survival event (EFS), whichever occurred first. The QoL analysis set included all pts who had a BL PRO and ≥1 completed measure at D50, D100, or D150. A clinically meaningful change was defined as 10 points for each EORTC QLQ-C30 score, 7 points for EQ-5D-5L VAS score. Results: As of 03/18/2021, 51 and 58 elderly pts were randomized to the axi-cel and SOC arms, respectively, with median ages (range) of 70 y (65-80) and 69 y (65-81). At BL, more axi-cel versus SOC pts had high-risk features, including 2L age-adjusted IPI 2-3 (53% vs 31%) and elevated LDH (61% vs 41%). EFS was superior with axi-cel versus SOC (HR, 0.276, P< 0.0001), with higher CR rates (75% vs 33%). Grade ≥3 Tx-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in 94% and 82% of axi-cel and SOC pts, respectively, and Grade 5 Tx-related AEs occurred in 0 and 1 pt. In the QoL analysis set comprising 46 axi-cel and 42 SOC pts, there were statistically significant and clinically meaningful differences in mean change of scores from BL at D100 favoring axi-cel for EORTC QLQ-C30 GH ( P<0.0001) and PF ( P=0.0019) and EQ-5D-5L VAS ( P<0.0001). For all 3 domains, scores also favored ( P<0.05) axi-cel over SOC at D150. The mean estimated scores numerically returned to or exceeded BL scores earlier in the axi-cel arm (by D150) but never equaled or exceed BL scores by M15 in the SOC arm. Conclusions: Axi-cel demonstrated superiority over 2L SOC in pts ≥65 y with significantly improved EFS and a manageable safety profile. Compared with SOC, axi-cel also showed meaningful improvement in QoL over SOC, measured by multiple validated PRO instruments, with suggested faster recovery to pre-Tx QoL. The superior clinical outcomes and pt experience with axi-cel over SOC should help inform Tx choices in 2L R/R LBCL for pts ≥65 y. Clinical trial information: NCT03391466.

Three-year follow-up of outcomes with KTE-X19 in patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma in ZUMA-2

7518

Background: Brexucabtagene autoleucel (KTE-X19) is an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy approved for the treatment of patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). In ZUMA-2, a 93% objective response rate (ORR; 67% complete response [CR] rate) was reported with KTE-X19 in pts with R/R MCL (median follow-up: 12.3 mo; 60 efficacy-evaluable pts; Wang et al. N Engl J Med. 2020). Here, we present updated outcomes with 2 years of additional follow-up. Methods: Adult pts (≥18 years) with R/R MCL underwent leukapheresis and conditioning chemotherapy followed by a single infusion of KTE-X19. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was an exploratory endpoint (sensitivity 10-5) evaluated in peripheral blood using next-generation sequencing. Updated results are reported for all 68 treated pts. Results: After 35.6 mo median follow-up, the ORR (CR + partial response) was 91% (95% CI, 81.8-96.7), with a 68% CR rate (95% CI, 55.2-78.5). The median duration of response (DOR) was 28.2 mo (95% CI, 13.5-47.1), with 25 of 68 treated pts (37%) still in ongoing response (all CR) at data cutoff. Late relapse > 24 mo post-infusion was infrequent (n = 3). The medians for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 25.8 mo (95% CI, 9.6-47.6) and 46.6 mo (95% CI, 24.9-not estimable), respectively. MRD was analyzed in 29 pts total; 24 of 29 were MRD-negative at mo 1, and 15 of 19 with available data were MRD-negative at mo 6. At data cutoff, the medians for DOR, PFS, and OS in the 15 MRD-negative pts were all not reached, vs 6.1, 7.1, and 27.0 mo, in the 4 MRD-positive pts, respectively. MRD-negative status at mo 1, 3, and 6 was associated with durable response, with 55%, 71%, and 69% of MRD-negative pts at those timepoints remaining in ongoing CR at data cutoff. Circulating tumor DNA analysis of MRD at mo 3 and 6 was predictive of relapse (AUC 0.80 and 0.75, respectively). No new safety signals were observed. Only 3% of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) of interest occurred since the primary report. The most frequent Grade ≥3 AE was neutropenia (1 [1%] Grade 3; 7 [10%] Grade 4). Two pts had KTE-X19-related Grade 3 serious infections: pneumonia and upper respiratory tract infection (n = 1); influenza (n = 1). There were no new cytokine release syndrome AEs and 1 new serious neurologic AE of Grade 3 encephalopathy (13.0 mo post-infusion) that was considered not related to study treatment. Three new Grade 5 AEs occurred, none of which were considered related to study treatment: Salmonella bacteremia (24.9 mo post-infusion), myelodysplastic syndrome (25.2 mo post-infusion), and acute myeloid leukemia (37.5 mo post-infusion). Conclusions: These data represent the longest follow-up of CAR T-cell therapy in pts with MCL to date and suggest that KTE-X19 induces durable long-term responses with manageable safety and low late relapse potential in R/R MCL. Clinical trial information: NCT02601313.

Real-world outcomes of axicabtagene ciloleucel (Axi-cel) for the treatment of large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) by race and ethnicity

7571

Background: In clinical trials of CAR T-cell therapies and real-world studies published to date, there is a paucity of data on outcomes by race and ethnicity. Here, we examined outcomes by race and ethnicity among LBCL pts who received axi-cel in the real-world setting. Methods: A total of 1389 pts with LBCL were identified from a non-interventional post-authorization safety study with pts receiving commercial axi-cel between 10/2017 and 08/2020. Race (African American or Asian vs White) and ethnicity (Hispanic vs non-Hispanic) were self-reported by pts. Pts with rescinded consent, enrolled in trials, having prior non-HCT cellular therapy, primary CNS lymphoma, unknown comorbidity or data in query were excluded. Median follow-up was 12.7 mo. Outcomes included ORR, CR rate, DOR, PFS and OS, grade ≥ 3 CRS (Lee 2014 criteria) and ICANS (ASTCT consensus grade). ORR and CR were evaluated in pts with ≥ 180 days of follow-up. Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated for PFS and OS. Multivariable analyses comparing race and ethnicity were conducted via logistic and Cox regression. Results: Among all, 1127 (81%) were White, 70 (5%) African American and 81 (6%) Asian; 152 (11%) were Hispanic including 104 White, 2 Black, and 1 Asian Hispanic. African Americans, compared to White, were younger (median age 55.5 vs 62.8 years), more likely to have pulmonary impairment (41% vs 28%) and tended to have longer time from diagnosis (≥ 12 mo 71% vs 59%). Hispanic pts were younger (median age 58.5 vs 62.6 years) than non-Hispanic pts. ORR was 74% (CR 57%, 12-mo PFS and OS 48% and 63%) for White, 57% (CR 45%, 12-mo PFS and OS 36% and 62%) for African American, 67% (CR 53%, 12-mo PFS and OS 55% and 65%) for Asian and 73% (CR 55%, 12-mo PFS and OS 50% and 65%) for Hispanic pts. Grade ≥ 3 CRS and ICANS occurred in 7% and 18% of African American, 10% and 19% of Asian, and 8% and 27% of White pts, respectively. Hispanic pts had lower rates of grade ≥ 3 CRS and ICANS (4% and 15%) vs non-Hispanic (9% and 27%). African American race was associated with inferior ORR (OR 0.40; 95% CI, 0.24-0.69) and CR rate (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.32-0.93) vs White. Asian pts had favorable DOR compared to both White (HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.24-0.87) and African American (HR 0.39; 95% CI 0.17-0.88). No statistical differences were found in OS and PFS across races, nor in any efficacy outcome between Hispanic and non-Hispanic pts. Asian (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.29-0.96 vs White) and Hispanic pts (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.31-0.85 vs non-Hispanic) had lower risk of grade ≥ 3 ICANS. Conclusions: Overall, axi-cel showed favorable OS, PFS and safety profile regardless of race and ethnicity in the real-world setting. No notable differences in outcomes were observed for Hispanic or Asian pts. Lower response rates in African American pts noted here warrant further investigation including any underrepresentation not explained by a lower incidence rate for DLBCL (SEER), access to care, and disease burden.

Product characteristics associated with in vivo expansion of anti-CD19 CAR T cells in patients treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel)

3023

Background: Axi-cel (formerly KTE-C19) is an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy. ZUMA-1 is a multicenter, registrational trial of axi-cel in patients (pts) with refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma. In a prespecified interim analysis, ZUMA-1 met its primary endpoint, with a 76% objective response rate and a 47% complete response rate ( Blood 2016;128:LBA-6). Post-treatment CAR T cell blood levels were associated with objective response. Here, we describe novel associations between product characteristics and CAR T cell levels in pts. Methods: CAR T cell characteristics in axi-cel produced from 62 pts were analyzed by flow cytometry and modeled against CAR T cell levels. In vivo CAR T cell levels were measured by qPCR. T cell expansion during production (fold expansion/total days in culture) was compared with CAR T cell blood levels, using a partition analysis with expansion rates of ≥1 vs < 1. Wilcoxon 2-sample test and linear regression were used. Results: Axi-cel contained CCR7+ T cells (median, 42%; range, 15–73%), with naïve (CD45RA+/CCR7+; median, 12%; range, 1–57%), central memory (CD45RA−/CCR7+; median, 29%; range, 12–49%) phenotypes, and more differentiated CCR7− effector memory and effector T cells. On infusion, CAR T cells expanded rapidly, reaching peak levels within 2 weeks (median, 43 cells/μL; range, 1–1513), and were also measurable in all pts at 1 month (median, 2 cells/μL; range, 0.03–89). The CCR7+/CCR7− T cell ratio in axi-cel associated positively with peak ( P =0.001) and cumulative ( P =0.003) CAR T cell levels through 1 month. Axi-cel lots that expanded more rapidly during production (≥1.0-fold/d; n = 18/62) associated with higher cumulative levels of CAR T cells ( P =0.03). Other product characteristics, eg, CD4/CD8 ratio or number of infused T cells, were not significantly associated with CAR T cell blood levels. Conclusions: An association was observed between CAR T cell expansion in vivo and both the T cell growth rate during production and product cell phenotype pretreatment. A key attribute of axi-cel product was the presence of CCR7+ naïve/central memory T cells, without upfront T cell subset selection. Clinical trial information: NCT02348216.

Clinical and biologic covariates of outcomes in ZUMA-1: A pivotal trial of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel; KTE-C19) in patients with refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (r-NHL)

7512

Background: Outcomes in activated B cell subtype diffuse large B cell lymphoma (ABC-DLBCL) and r-NHL are poor (Sehn Blood 2015, Crump ASCO 2016). ZUMA-1 is the first, multicenter trial of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, axi-cel, in r-NHL. Methods: Dosing and eligibility were per Neelapu ASH 2016. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints were duration of response (DOR), overall survival (OS), and safety. Cell of origin (COO) and CD19 status were assessed centrally using Lymphoma Subtyping Test NanoString (Wallden JCO 2015) and a validated immunohistochemistry assay, respectively. Results: As of Jan 27, 2017, 111 patients (pts) were enrolled; the manufacturing success rate was 99% with an average 17-d turnaround time; 101 pts (modified intent-to-treat [mITT] population) received axi-cel. In the mITT population, the ORR was 82% (complete response [CR], 54%). With 8.7 m median follow-up, 44% remain in response and 39% in CR. The median DOR was 8.1 m and not reached (NR) for pts with CR. Median OS was NR. Results for clinical and biologic covariates are listed in the table. In pts who received tocilizumab (n = 43) and/or steroids (n = 27) for cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and/or neurologic events (NE), ORR was 84% and 78%, respectively. Most common grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia (66%), leukopenia (44%), anemia (43%), febrile neutropenia (31%), thrombocytopenia (24%), and encephalopathy (21%). Rates of grade ≥3 CRS and NE were 13% and 28%, respectively. There were 3 grade 5 AEs (Neelapu ASH 2016). Conclusions: Axi-cel induced an ORR of 82% in pts with r-NHL, response is ongoing in 44% of pts at 8.7 m. Similar clinical responses were observed in pts with r-ABC-DLBCL. AEs were manageable and the use of tocilizumab/steroids did not appear to impact ORR. Drs Locke and Neelapu contributed equally. Funding source: Kite Pharma and Leukemia & Lymphoma Society Therapy Acceleration Program Clinical trial information: NCT02348216. [Table: see text]

Zuma-6: Phase 1-2 multicenter study evaluating safety and efficacy of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel; KTE-C19) in combination with atezolizumab in patients with refractory diffuse large b-cell lymphoma (DLBCL)

TPS7572

Background: Approximately 1/3 of patients with DLBCL, the most common type of B-cell lymphoma, will become refractory to standard combination chemotherapy and have uniformly poor clinical outcomes (Crump, ASCO 2016). Axi-cel (autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor [CAR] T cell therapy) has shown promising response rates in patients with refractory DLBCL compared with standard approaches, although some patients do not respond or progress after an initial response (Locke, Mol Ther 2016). Expression of PD-L1 on DLBCL cells and activation-dependent expression of PD-1 on CAR T cells after infusion led to the hypothesis that PD-1 pathway blockade may augment the activity of axi-cel and result in improved clinical outcomes. This study will evaluate safety and efficacy of axi-cel when given with atezolizumab (anti–PD-L1 antibody), delivered sequentially, in patients with refractory DLBCL. Methods: Phase 1 will enroll ~3-9 patients to estimate the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities. Phase 2 will enroll ~22 patients to evaluate safety and efficacy, with a primary endpoint of complete response (CR) rate (Cheson 2007). Secondary endpoints include key efficacy outcomes such as objective response rate (CR+partial response [PR]), duration of response, progression-free and overall survival, and safety and biomarker outcomes. Eligible adult patients will have received prior adequate therapy (including anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody and an anthracycline-based regimen) and have an ECOG PS of 0-1 and adequate bone marrow and organ function. Patients with a history of Richter transformation, transformed follicular lymphoma, CNS disease, or active infection are not eligible. Patients will receive fludarabine 30 mg/m2/d and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2/d × 3 d, followed by a single infusion of axi-cel (target dose, 2 × 106anti-CD19 CAR T cells/kg) followed by atezolizumab 1200 mg given every 21 d for 4 doses (phase 1, first dose to occur 21, 14, and 1 d after axi-cel infusion in cohorts 1, 2, and 3, respectively). The study opened to accrual in September 2016. Clinical trial information: NCT02926833.

Characterization of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell-mediated tumor microenvironment immune gene profile in a multicenter trial (ZUMA-1) with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel, KTE-C19)

3025

Background: Axi-cel is an autologous anti-CD19 CAR T cell therapy. ZUMA-1 is a multicenter, registrational trial of axi-cel in patients (pts) with refractory/aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). In a pre-specified interim analysis, ZUMA-1 met its primary endpoint with 76% objective response rate and 47% complete response (Blood 2016;128:LBA-6). We describe, for the first time, a tumor microenvironment immune gene signature associated with CAR T cell treatment (tx) of NHL pts. Methods: Paired biopsies, pre- and within 3 weeks post-axi-cel tx, were analyzed by digital gene expression followed by a pre-specified bioinformatics algorithm applied to IGES15 and IGES21 genes involved in immune-mediated tumor regression (Immunosign; Galon Immunity 2013). Immunosign profiles expression of a pre-defined set of effector T cell, Th1, chemokine, and cytokine genes. Expression analysis and hierarchical clustering were used to define an axi-cel-related tumor immune gene signature. Wilcoxon signed rank test with multiple test correction by FDR (Benjamini-Yekutieli) was used. Results: Gene expression profile comparisons of pre- and post-axi-cel tx biopsies from 14 pts showed profound changes in gene expression within the tumor environment after infusion. The most upregulated genes post-axi-cel tx were CCL5 (RANTES), CTLA4, and GZMA (log2 fold change > 2, P< 0.05, FDR < 0.050). Immune checkpoints PD-L1 and LAG3 were also upregulated post-axi-cel (log2 fold change > 1.6, P< 0.05, FDR < 0.055). Other genes associated with T cell proliferation, homing, and effector function were also upregulated: IL-15, GZMK, CXC3CL1 (Fractalkine), CD8A, and STAT4 (log2 fold change > 1.6; P< 0.05, FDR < 0.074). Additional baseline tumor characteristics and associative analysis will be presented. Conclusions: We define a mechanistic tumor immune gene signature in NHL pts associated with axi-cel tx. This signature comprises upregulation of T cell activation, effector, chemokine, and immune checkpoint genes. These data will potentially lead to rational optimization of T cell interventions in cancer Clinical trial information: NCT02348216.

Development of highly selective SH3 binding peptides for Crk and CRKL which disrupt Crk-complexes with DOCK180, SoS and C3G

Many Src Homology 3 (SH3) domains function as molecular adhesives in intracellular signal transduction. Based on previous ultrastructural studies, short motifs which bind to the first SH3 domains of the adapters Crk and CRKL were selectively mutagenised to generate Crk/CRKL SH3-binding peptides of very high affinity and selectivity. Affinities were increased up to 20-fold compared to the best wildtype sequences, while the selectivity against a similar SH3 domain [Grb2SH3(N)] was not only retained, but sometimes increased. Blot techniques with GST-fusion peptides and in solution precipitation assays with biotinylated high affinity Crk binding peptides (HACBPs) were subsequently used to analyse the binding of these sequences to a large panel of SH3 domain-containing fusion proteins. Only those proteins which contained the CrkSH3(1) or CRKLSH3(1) domains bound efficiently to the HACBPs. A GST-HACBP fusion protein precipitated Crk and CRKL proteins out of 35S-labelled and unlabelled cell lysates. Very little binding of other cellular proteins to HACBP was detectable, indicative of a great preference for Crk and CRKL when compared to the wide variety of other endogenous cellular proteins. Moreover, HACBP disrupted in vitro preexisting Crk-complexes with DOCK180 and the exchange factors SoS and C3G, which are known targets of Crk adapters, in a concentration dependent manner. HACBP-based molecules should therefore be useful as highly selective inhibitors of intracellular signalling processes involving Crk and CRKL.

The effects of noise in transient EOAE newborn hearing screening

The use of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) has been advocated as the first stage entry level technique for universal newborn hearing screening. To date, the majority of TEOAE infant testing has been conducted under controlled noise conditions; i.e., acoustically treated sound suites. As a result, previously reported TEOAE evaluations may not realistically represent test outcomes in actual hospital screening settings. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of TEOAEs with auditory brainstem response (ABR) hearing screening in a hospital environment where noise conditions do not meet the same ambient noise specifications as those found in sound rooms. A total of 119 stable newborns (67 high risk, 52 normal) ranging in post-conceptual age (PCA) from 33 to 41 weeks received both the ABR and TEOAE screening protocols. Testing was conducted at crib side in either the well baby nursery or the neonatal special care unit (NSCU). Newborn ABR screening failed 8 (3.8%) of 224 ears, whereas TEOAE testing failed 85 (38.4%) and could not test another 22 (9.8%) ears. That is, only 117 (52.2%) of the 224 ears passed the TEOAE test. Using the ABR as the reference test the specificity and sensitivity for TEOAE was 52% and 50%, respectively. Noise levels measured by the probe microphone within the ear canal exceeded those levels (30 dBA SPL) recommended for TEOAE newborn hearing screening. Results of this study suggest that under realistic hearing screening test conditions, TEOAE results may be influenced by the level of noise in the testing environment. Whereas significant advances have been attained in TEOAE measurement during the past decade, clinical evidence supports the need for continued research aimed at solving problems before this technique can be used efficiently for newborn screening.

Follow-up services in newborn hearing screening programs

Newborn hearing screening programs have gained wide acceptance as a means of identifying infants at risk for hearing loss. For the most part, the auditory brainstem response (ABR) technique has been the measurement tool universally adopted in the evaluation of high-risk infants. Over the years, the ABR has been used successfully with a negligible false-negative rate. Unfortunately, program follow-up services have not received similar attention, and there is a lack in program development. This article describes a series of follow-up measures that include the use of a questionnaire sent to the parents/caregivers of 401 infants who pass either the initial or retest ABR screen. A total of 262 (65%) response questionnaires were returned. The results of the questionnaire and recommendations regarding follow-up services are discussed.

Automated and conventional ABR screening techniques in high-risk infants

Test validity is determined by the proportion of results that are diagnostically confirmed and predicted on the measures used to identify the disease process. This article summarizes the results of a series of 224 stable high-risk infants who were screened by automated (ALGO-1) and conventional (Bio-logics LT) ABR instrumentation. Failure criteria was defined as the absence or prolongation of a replicable wave V response (conventional) or Refer by the automated system. The overall failure rates at a 35 dB screening level were comparable between devices. Sensitivity and specificity measures for the ALGO-1 unit were 100 and 96 percent, respectively. Permanent hearing loss was demonstrated in 5 percent of the newborns screened in this study. Advantages of the automated system include a dual artifact rejection system, attenuating ear couplers, and a battery operated design. These findings suggest that the automated ABR screener is a viable alternative to conventional ABR instrumentation for the limited purpose of neonatal auditory screening.

Hearing loss in prison inmates

The incidence of hearing disorders in 34 State Penitentiary prison inmates all with a previous history of drug abuse were investigated. Subjects were evaluated using routine pure-tone air conduction audiometry, immittance measures, and short-latency auditory brain stem responses. Of the 34 inmates, 20 (58.8%) demonstrated normal bilateral peripheral hearing sensitivity, whereas 10 (29.4%) inmates presented with some degree of hearing impairment. In addition, the conflicting results of elevated pure-tone thresholds with normal immittance measures and normal ABR findings suggested that four (11.8%) subjects exhibited functional hearing loss. The results of this study support the reported high incidence of hearing loss in the prison population. The synergistic effects of drug abuse, noise exposure, and head trauma as possible contributing factors are discussed.