1
|
Wildiers H, Armstrong A, Cuypere E, Dalenc F, Dirix L, Chan S, Marme F, Schröder CP, Huober J, Duhoux FP, Vuylsteke P, Jager A, Brain E, Kuemmel S, Pápai Z, Menke-van der Houven van Oordt CW, Perjesi L, Mueller C, Brignone C, Triebel F. Paclitaxel plus Eftilagimod Alpha, a Soluble LAG-3 Protein, in Metastatic, HR+ Breast Cancer: Results from AIPAC, a Randomized, Placebo Controlled Phase IIb Trial. Clin Cancer Res 2024; 30:532-541. [PMID: 37939105 PMCID: PMC10831339 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-1173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Revised: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Eftilagimod alpha (efti), a soluble lymphocyte activation gene (LAG-3) protein and MHC class II agonist, enhances innate and adaptive immunity. Active Immunotherapy PAClitaxel (AIPAC) evaluated safety and efficacy of efti plus paclitaxel in patients with predominantly endocrine-resistant, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (ET-resistant HR+ HER2- MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Women with HR+ HER2- MBC were randomized 1:1 to weekly intravenous paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) and subcutaneous efti (30 mg) or placebo every 2 weeks for six 4-week cycles, then monthly subcutaneous efti (30 mg) or placebo maintenance. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), safety/tolerability, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, and quality of life. Exploratory endpoints included cellular biomarkers. RESULTS 114 patients received efti and 112 patients received placebo. Median age was 60 years (91.6% visceral disease, 84.1% ET-resistant, 44.2% with previous CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment). Median PFS at 7.3 months was similar for efti and placebo. Median OS was not significantly improved for efti (20.4 vs. 17.5 months; HR, 0.88; P = 0.197) but became significant for predefined exploratory subgroups. EORTC QLQC30-B23 global health status was sustained for efti but deteriorated for placebo. Efti increased absolute lymphocyte, monocyte and secondary target cell (CD4, CD8) counts, plasma IFNγ and CXCL10 levels. CONCLUSIONS Although the primary endpoint, PFS, was not met, AIPAC confirmed expected pharmacodynamic effects and demonstrated excellent safety profile for efti. OS was not significantly improved globally (2.9-month difference), but was significantly improved in exploratory biomarker subgroups, warranting further studies to clarify efti's role in patients with ET-resistant HER2- MBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans Wildiers
- Department of General Medical Oncology and Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Anne Armstrong
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Luc Dirix
- GZA ziekenhuizen Campus Sint-Augustinus, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Steve Chan
- Nottingham Cancer Clinical Trials Team (NCCTT), Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Frederik Marme
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carolina P. Schröder
- Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam and University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Jens Huober
- Breast Center Cantonal Hospital St Gallen, Switzerland and Department of Gynaecology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | | | - Peter Vuylsteke
- CHU UCL Namur, Site Sainte-Elisabeth, UCLouvain, Namur, Belgium
| | - Agnes Jager
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Etienne Brain
- Institut Curie-Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Sherko Kuemmel
- Breat Unit, KEM Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Berlin, Germany
| | - Zsuzsanna Pápai
- MH Egészségügyi Központ Onkológiai Osztály, Budapest, Hungary
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
de Weger VA, Schutte T, Konings IRHM, Menke-van der Houven van Oordt CW. Successful Trastuzumab-Deruxtecan Rechallenge After Interstitial Lung Disease: A Case Report. J Breast Cancer 2023; 26:519-523. [PMID: 37926069 PMCID: PMC10625870 DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2023.26.e38] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is used to treat human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive advanced breast cancer. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a severe adverse event associated with T-DXd. Current guidelines recommend permanent discontinuation of T-DXd after Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade ≥ 2 ILD. Here, we describe a case of successful rechallenge with T-DXd after CTCAE grade 2 treatment-induced ILD. After discontinuation of T-DXd, ILD was treated with steroids until complete resolution. Given the initial beneficial antitumor response, retreatment was discussed during disease progression. In a shared decision with the patient, T-DXd was restarted at the lowest registered dose, along with low-dose steroids. ILD did not reoccur. Importantly, both clinical and radiological responses to the treatment were observed, with an improvement in the patient's quality of life. This case demonstrates that retreatment with T-DXd after a grade 2 ILD event is feasible and yields clinical benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent A de Weger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tim Schutte
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Inge R H M Konings
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
de Vries BM, Zwezerijnen GJC, Burchell GL, van Velden FHP, Menke-van der Houven van Oordt CW, Boellaard R. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in radiology and nuclear medicine: a literature review. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1180773. [PMID: 37250654 PMCID: PMC10213317 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1180773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Rational Deep learning (DL) has demonstrated a remarkable performance in diagnostic imaging for various diseases and modalities and therefore has a high potential to be used as a clinical tool. However, current practice shows low deployment of these algorithms in clinical practice, because DL algorithms lack transparency and trust due to their underlying black-box mechanism. For successful employment, explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) could be introduced to close the gap between the medical professionals and the DL algorithms. In this literature review, XAI methods available for magnetic resonance (MR), computed tomography (CT), and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging are discussed and future suggestions are made. Methods PubMed, Embase.com and Clarivate Analytics/Web of Science Core Collection were screened. Articles were considered eligible for inclusion if XAI was used (and well described) to describe the behavior of a DL model used in MR, CT and PET imaging. Results A total of 75 articles were included of which 54 and 17 articles described post and ad hoc XAI methods, respectively, and 4 articles described both XAI methods. Major variations in performance is seen between the methods. Overall, post hoc XAI lacks the ability to provide class-discriminative and target-specific explanation. Ad hoc XAI seems to tackle this because of its intrinsic ability to explain. However, quality control of the XAI methods is rarely applied and therefore systematic comparison between the methods is difficult. Conclusion There is currently no clear consensus on how XAI should be deployed in order to close the gap between medical professionals and DL algorithms for clinical implementation. We advocate for systematic technical and clinical quality assessment of XAI methods. Also, to ensure end-to-end unbiased and safe integration of XAI in clinical workflow, (anatomical) data minimization and quality control methods should be included.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bart M. de Vries
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Gerben J. C. Zwezerijnen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Aftimos P, Neven P, Pegram M, van Oordt CWMVDH, Dees EC, Schröder C, Jager A, Bulat I, Chap L, Maglakelidze M, Hamilton E, Cristofanilli M, Ulahannan S, Boers J, Iqbal R, Crijanovschi A, Wolfgang CD, Tao W, Sipes C, Malik R, Jain S. Abstract PS12-04: Rintodestrant (G1T48), an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader in ER+/HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer: Updated phase 1 results and dose selection. Cancer Res 2021. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs20-ps12-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Rintodestrant (G1T48) is a potent oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) that competitively binds to the estrogen receptor (ER) and blocks ER signaling in tumors resistant to other endocrine therapies. Preliminary results from Part 1 dose escalation showed robust target engagement on 18F-fluoroestradiol positron emission tomography (FES-PET), a favorable safety profile, and encouraging antitumor activity in patients with heavily pretreated ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC), including those with ESR1 mutations (Dees et al., ESMO 2019 [abstract #3587]). Here, we present updated results from dose escalation and expansion (Parts 1 and 2). Methods: This Phase 1, first-in-human, open-label study evaluated rintodestrant monotherapy in women with ER+/HER2- ABC after progression on endocrine therapy. Part 1 was a 3+3 dose escalation (200-1000 mg once daily [QD]); Part 2 expanded 600 and 1000 mg QD; and Part 3 was added to assess rintodestrant with palbociclib in patients in earlier lines in the advanced setting. Primary objectives included dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, and recommended Phase 2 dose. Secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics and antitumor activity (RECIST v1.1). Exploratory objectives included pharmacodynamic inhibition of ER target engagement (FES-PET), mutation profiling (cell-free DNA [cfDNA]), and change in ER expression from baseline to on-treatment tumor biopsies. Results: As of May 13, 2020, 67 patients (Part 1: n = 26; Part 2: n = 41) were treated, with a median age of 61 years (range 34-83) and ECOG PS of 0 (49%) or 1 (51%). Median number of prior lines in the advanced setting was 2 (range 0-9), including prior fulvestrant (64%), CDK4/6 inhibitor (69%), mTOR inhibitor (22%), and/or chemotherapy (46%). Median number of prior lines of endocrine therapy in the advanced setting was 2 (range 0-5), with 61% of patients having received ≥2 lines. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 70% of patients. The most common TRAEs in ≥10% of patients included hot flush (24%), fatigue (21%), nausea (19%), diarrhea (18%), and vomiting (10%), mostly grade 1 or 2. No DLTs were reported and MTD was not reached. Dose reduction due to TRAEs occurred in 1 patient (1%), with elevated transaminases (grade 3 ALT and grade 2 AST) at 600 mg. Serious TRAEs occurred in 2 patients at 1000 mg (grade 5 cerebral hemorrhage in the setting of low molecular weight heparin and grade 2 upper abdominal pain). Two patients (3%) discontinued treatment due to TRAEs. Overall, the frequency of patients with TRAEs at 800 mg was comparable with that at 600 mg (57% vs 63%) and less than that at 1000 mg (81%). Of 67 patients, 16 were on study treatment for ≥24 weeks and 3 (n = 1 at 600 mg; n = 2 at 1000 mg, including 1 with ESR1 mutation) had a confirmed partial response (clinical benefit rate [CBR]: 28%). FES-PET standard uptake values decreased at week 4 with a mean reduction of 87% (±8%) at doses ≥ 600 mg. Of 59 patients tested for baseline cfDNA, 41% harbored ≥1 ESR1 mutation, with a similar CBR in both groups (33% in ESR1 mutant and 29% in ESR1 wild-type). Seven of 9 patients had a decrease in ER immunohistochemistry H-score at both 600 and 1000 mg (median [range]: -27.8% [-33.8%, -3.4%]), irrespective of ESR1 mutation status. Based on safety, efficacy, and ER degradation, 800 mg was selected as the optimal dose for further study. Conclusions: Rintodestrant continues to demonstrate an excellent safety/tolerability profile across all doses, with promising antitumor activity in patients with heavily pretreated ER+/HER2- ABC, including those with tumors harboring ESR1 mutations. Part 3 of this study, evaluating rintodestrant 800 mg QD with palbociclib in a more endocrine-sensitive population, is ongoing (NCT03455270).
Citation Format: Philippe Aftimos, Patrick Neven, Mark Pegram, Catharina Willemien Menke-van der Houven van Oordt, E. Claire Dees, Carolien Schröder, Agnes Jager, Iurie Bulat, Linnea Chap, Marina Maglakelidze, Erika Hamilton, Massimo Cristofanilli, Susanna Ulahannan, Jorianne Boers, Ramsha Iqbal, Adrian Crijanovschi, Curt D Wolfgang, Wenli Tao, Christina Sipes, Rajesh Malik, Sarika Jain. Rintodestrant (G1T48), an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader in ER+/HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer: Updated phase 1 results and dose selection [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS12-04.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe Aftimos
- 1Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Mark Pegram
- 3Stanford Women’s Cancer Center, Stanford, CA
| | | | - E. Claire Dees
- 5UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | - Agnes Jager
- 7Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Iurie Bulat
- 8Arensia Exploratory Medicine Research Unit, Institute of Oncology, Chisinau, Moldova, Republic of
| | - Linnea Chap
- 9Beverly Hills Cancer Center, Beverly Hills, CA
| | | | - Erika Hamilton
- 11Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN
| | | | | | - Jorianne Boers
- 6University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Ramsha Iqbal
- 4Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Adrian Crijanovschi
- 8Arensia Exploratory Medicine Research Unit, Institute of Oncology, Chisinau, Moldova, Republic of
| | | | - Wenli Tao
- 14G1 Therapeutics, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC
| | | | - Rajesh Malik
- 14G1 Therapeutics, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC
| | - Sarika Jain
- 14G1 Therapeutics, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Aftimos P, Maglakelidze M, Glaudemans AWJM, Hamilton E, Chap L, de Vries E, Menke-van der Houven van Oordt CW, Jager A, Dees EC, Cristofanilli M, Pegram M, Ulahannan S, Neven P, Bulat I, Rai R, Tao W, Jain S, Beelen AP, Sorrentino JA. Abstract PD8-07: Pharmacodynamic analysis from a phase 1 study of rintodestrant (G1T48), an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader, in ER+/HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Res 2021. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs20-pd8-07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Rintodestrant is an orally bioavailable, potent and selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) that inhibits estrogen receptor (ER) gene transcription, degrades the ER, and delays tumor proliferation in preclinical models. Preliminary results from Part 1 dose escalation (200-1000 mg once daily) demonstrated that rintodestrant has a favorable safety profile and encouraging antitumor activity in patients (pts) with heavily pretreated ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC) (Dees et al., ESMO 2019 [abstract #3587]). Here, we report the pharmacodynamic (PD) analysis in peripheral blood and tumor biopsies from pts who received rintodestrant in Part 1 and 2 (600 and 1000 mg dose expansion) to characterize the pt population and mechanisms of response. Methods: This Phase 1, first-in-human, open-label study evaluated rintodestrant in women with ER+/HER- ABC after progression on endocrine therapy. PD analysis included inhibition of ER target engagement with 18F-fluoroestradiol positron emission tomography (FES-PET), mutational profiling (cell-free DNA [cfDNA]), and circulating tumor cell (CTC) enumeration. Tumor biopsies sampled at baseline and 6 weeks on treatment were evaluated for ER degradation (immunohistochemistry [IHC]) and proliferation (Ki67, IHC) to understand the on-target effects of rintodestrant. Results: As of May 13, 2020, 67 pts had been treated. FES-PET data were obtained in 14 pts and showed a decrease in all pts, with maximum standard uptake values (SUVmax) ranging from 70% to 98% after 4 weeks of rintodestrant monotherapy across all doses. Fifty-nine pts were tested for cfDNA at baseline; 95% (n = 56) harbored ≥1 somatic variant (median = 3 mutations per pt). Among pts with somatic variants, 41% had ESR1 mutations, with D538G being the most common (58%). Additionally, 46% and 42% of pts harbored mutations in TP53 and PIK3CA, respectively, and 10% had mutations in both ESR1 and PIK3CA. Similar clinical benefit rates were observed in wild-type vs ESR1 and/or PIK3CA mutant tumors. An analysis of change of variant allele fraction (VAF) in 55 pts between baseline and 2 weeks of treatment revealed that 58% had a decrease in mean VAF, with a decrease in ESR1 VAF in 16/20 pts that had ESR1 mutations at baseline. Furthermore, of 24 pts who had samples collected at baseline and progression, 16 (67%) developed additional variants (median [range]: 2 [1, 15]), including EGFR, ERBB2, TP53, and ESR1. CTC analysis (n = 45) showed the mean value of Epi+CD45- CTCs decreased from 2.8 cells/mL to 1.8 cells/mL after 8 weeks of treatment. Tumor biopsies were collected in 9 pts (5 received 600 mg and 4 received 1000 mg) at baseline and 6 weeks on treatment. Of the 7/9 pts that had a decrease in the ER H-score (median [range]: -27.8% [-33.8%, -3.4%]), 4 had ≥1 variant in ESR1 at baseline. Overall, 4 pts had a decrease in Ki67, with reductions mostly observed in pts who received 600 mg rintodestrant. Additional analyses, including correlations with clinical response, are ongoing and will be presented. Conclusions: Rintodestrant demonstrated robust ER target engagement on FES-PET, as well as substantial decreases in ER H-score, cfDNA VAF, and Epi+CD45- CTCs. These data, along with promising clinical benefit in pts with heavily pretreated ER+/HER2- ABC, regardless of ESR1 or PIK3CA mutation status, warrant additional investigation of rintodestrant (NCT03455270).
Citation Format: Philippe Aftimos, Marina Maglakelidze, Andor WJM Glaudemans, Erika Hamilton, Linnea Chap, Elisabeth de Vries, Catharina Willemien Menke-van der Houven van Oordt, Agnes Jager, E. Claire Dees, Massimo Cristofanilli, Mark Pegram, Susanna Ulahannan, Patrick Neven, Iurie Bulat, Ruhi Rai, Wenli Tao, Sarika Jain, Andrew P Beelen, Jessica A Sorrentino. Pharmacodynamic analysis from a phase 1 study of rintodestrant (G1T48), an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader, in ER+/HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD8-07.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe Aftimos
- 1Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | - Erika Hamilton
- 4Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN
| | - Linnea Chap
- 5Beverly Hills Cancer Center, Beverly Hills, CA
| | | | | | - Agnes Jager
- 7Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - E. Claire Dees
- 8UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | - Mark Pegram
- 10Stanford Women’s Cancer Center, Stanford, CA
| | | | | | - Iurie Bulat
- 13Arensia Exploratory Medicine Research Unit, Institute of Oncology, Chisinau, Moldova, Republic of
| | - Ruhi Rai
- 14G1 Therapeutics, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC
| | - Wenli Tao
- 14G1 Therapeutics, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC
| | - Sarika Jain
- 14G1 Therapeutics, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Matlung HL, Babes L, Zhao XW, van Houdt M, Treffers LW, van Rees DJ, Franke K, Schornagel K, Verkuijlen P, Janssen H, Halonen P, Lieftink C, Beijersbergen RL, Leusen JHW, Boelens JJ, Kuhnle I, van der Werff Ten Bosch J, Seeger K, Rutella S, Pagliara D, Matozaki T, Suzuki E, Menke-van der Houven van Oordt CW, van Bruggen R, Roos D, van Lier RAW, Kuijpers TW, Kubes P, van den Berg TK. Neutrophils Kill Antibody-Opsonized Cancer Cells by Trogoptosis. Cell Rep 2019; 23:3946-3959.e6. [PMID: 29949776 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.05.082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 209] [Impact Index Per Article: 41.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2017] [Revised: 03/30/2018] [Accepted: 05/23/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Destruction of cancer cells by therapeutic antibodies occurs, at least in part, through antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), and this can be mediated by various Fc-receptor-expressing immune cells, including neutrophils. However, the mechanism(s) by which neutrophils kill antibody-opsonized cancer cells has not been established. Here, we demonstrate that neutrophils can exert a mode of destruction of cancer cells, which involves antibody-mediated trogocytosis by neutrophils. Intimately associated with this is an active mechanical disruption of the cancer cell plasma membrane, leading to a lytic (i.e., necrotic) type of cancer cell death. Furthermore, this mode of destruction of antibody-opsonized cancer cells by neutrophils is potentiated by CD47-SIRPα checkpoint blockade. Collectively, these findings show that neutrophil ADCC toward cancer cells occurs by a mechanism of cytotoxicity called trogoptosis, which can be further improved by targeting CD47-SIRPα interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanke L Matlung
- Sanquin Research, and Landsteiner Laboratory, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Liane Babes
- Immunology Research Group, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Xi Wen Zhao
- Sanquin Research, and Landsteiner Laboratory, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michel van Houdt
- Sanquin Research, and Landsteiner Laboratory, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Louise W Treffers
- Sanquin Research, and Landsteiner Laboratory, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dieke J van Rees
- Sanquin Research, and Landsteiner Laboratory, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Katka Franke
- Sanquin Research, and Landsteiner Laboratory, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Karin Schornagel
- Sanquin Research, and Landsteiner Laboratory, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Paul Verkuijlen
- Sanquin Research, and Landsteiner Laboratory, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hans Janssen
- Division of Cell Biology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pasi Halonen
- Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis and the NKI Robotics and Screening Center, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cor Lieftink
- Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis and the NKI Robotics and Screening Center, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Roderick L Beijersbergen
- Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis and the NKI Robotics and Screening Center, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jeanette H W Leusen
- Immunotherapy Laboratory, Laboratory for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jaap J Boelens
- U-DANCE, Laboratory for Translational Immunology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Pediatrics, Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ingrid Kuhnle
- Department of Pediatrics, University Medicine Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | | | - Karl Seeger
- Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Otto-Heubner-Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sergio Rutella
- Division of Translational Medicine, Sidra Medical and Research Center, Doha, Qatar
| | - Daria Pagliara
- Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, IRCCS Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Takashi Matozaki
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Division of Molecular and Cellular Signaling, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe 650-0017, Japan
| | - Eiji Suzuki
- Department of Breast Surgery, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | | | - Robin van Bruggen
- Sanquin Research, and Landsteiner Laboratory, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dirk Roos
- Sanquin Research, and Landsteiner Laboratory, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rene A W van Lier
- Sanquin Research, and Landsteiner Laboratory, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Taco W Kuijpers
- Sanquin Research, and Landsteiner Laboratory, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Paul Kubes
- Immunology Research Group, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Timo K van den Berg
- Sanquin Research, and Landsteiner Laboratory, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Molecular Cell Biology and Immunology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Menke-van der Houven van Oordt CW, Gootjes EC, Huisman MC, Vugts DJ, Roth C, Luik AM, Mulder ER, Schuit RC, Boellaard R, Hoekstra OS, van Dongen GA, Verheul HMW. 89Zr-cetuximab PET imaging in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Oncotarget 2016; 6:30384-93. [PMID: 26309164 PMCID: PMC4745807 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.4672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2015] [Accepted: 07/10/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are used in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (mCRC). Approximately 50% of patients benefit despite patient selection for RAS wild type (wt) tumors. Based on the hypothesis that tumor targeting is required for clinical benefit of anti-EGFR treatment, biodistribution and tumor uptake of (89)Zr-cetuximab by Positron Emission Tomography (PET), combining the sensitivity of PET with the specificity of cetuximab for EGFR was evaluated. Ten patients with wt K-RAS mCRC received 37 ± 1 MBq (89)Zr-cetuximab directly (<2 h) after the first therapeutic dose of cetuximab. PET-scans were performed from 1 hour to 10 days post injection (p.i.). Biodistribution was determined for blood and organs. Uptake in tumor lesions was quantified by Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) and related to response. In 6 of 10 patients (89)Zr-cetuximab uptake in tumor lesions was detected. Four of 6 patients with (89)Zr-cetuximab uptake had clinical benefit, while progressive disease was observed in 3 of 4 patients without (89)Zr-cetuximab uptake. Taken together, tumor uptake of 89Zr-cetuximab can be visualized by PET imaging. The strong relation between uptake and response warrants further clinical validation as an innovative selection method for cetuximab treatment in patients with wt RAS mCRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elske C Gootjes
- Dept of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc C Huisman
- Dept of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Danielle J Vugts
- Dept of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Chantal Roth
- Dept of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anne Marije Luik
- Dept of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emma R Mulder
- Dept of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert C Schuit
- Dept of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Dept of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Otto S Hoekstra
- Dept of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Guus Ams van Dongen
- Dept of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk M W Verheul
- Dept of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|