Neurosurgical treatment of pediatric brain tumors - results from a single center multidisciplinary setup

OBJECTIVE

The challenge of pediatric brain tumor surgery is given due to a relative low prevalence but high heterogeneity in age, localization, and pathology. Improvements of long-term overall survival rates were achieved during the past decades stressing the importance of a multidisciplinary decision process guided by a national treatment protocol. We reviewed the entire spectrum of pediatric brain tumor surgeries from the perspective of an interdisciplinary pediatric neuro-oncology center in Germany.

METHODS

Every patient who underwent brain tumor surgery from January 2010 to June 2017 in our Pediatric Neurosurgery department was retrospectively included and evaluated regarding the course of treatment. Perioperative data such as tumor localization, timing of surgery, extent of resection, neuropathological diagnosis, transfusion rates, oncologic and radiation therapy, and neurological follow-up including morbidity and mortality were evaluated.

RESULTS

Two hundred ninety-three pediatric brain tumor patients were applicable (age: 8.28 ± 5.62 years, 1.22:1.0 m:f). A total of 531 tumor surgical interventions was performed within these patients (457 tumor resections, 74 tumor biopsies; mean interventions per patient 1.8 ± 1.2). Due to a critical neurologic status, 32 operations (6%) were performed on the day of admission. In 65.2% of all cases, tumor were approached supratentorially. Most frequent diagnoses of the cases were glial tumors (47.8%) and embryonal tumors (17.6%). Preoperative planned extent of resection was achieved in 92.7%. Pre- and postoperative neurologic deficits resolved completely in 30.7%, whereas symptom regressed in 28.6% of surgical interventions. New postoperative neurologic deficit was observed in 10.7%, which resolved or improved in 80% of these cases during 30 days. The mortality rate was 1%.

CONCLUSION

We outlined the center perspective of a specialized pediatric neuro-oncological center describing the heterogeneous distribution of cases regarding age-related prevalence, tumor localization, and biology, which requires a high multidisciplinary expertise. The study contributes to define challenges in treating pediatric brain tumors and to develop quality indicators for pediatric neuro-oncological surgery. We assume that an adequate volume load of patients within a interdisciplinary infrastructure is warranted to aim for effective treatment and decent quality of life for the majority of long-term surviving pediatric tumor patients.

Non-optical polyp-based resect and discard strategy: A prospective clinical study

BACKGROUND

Post-polypectomy surveillance intervals are currently determined based on pathology results.

AIM

To evaluate a polyp-based resect and discard model that assigns surveillance intervals based solely on polyp number and size.

METHODS

Patients undergoing elective colonoscopies at the Montreal University Medical Center were enrolled prospectively. The polyp-based strategy was used to assign the next surveillance interval using polyp size and number. Surveillance intervals were also assigned using optical diagnosis for small polyps (< 10 mm). The primary outcome was surveillance interval agreement between the polyp-based model, optical diagnosis, and the pathology-based reference standard using the 2020 United States Multi-Society Task Force guidelines. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of reduction in required histopathology evaluations and proportion of immediate post-colonoscopy recommendations provided to patients.

RESULTS

Of 944 patients (mean age 62.6 years, 49.3% male, 933 polyps) were enrolled. The surveillance interval agreement for the polyp-based strategy was 98.0% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.97-0.99] compared with pathology-based assignment. Optical diagnosis-based intervals achieved 95.8% (95%CI: 0.94-0.97) agreement with pathology. When using the polyp-based strategy and optical diagnosis, the need for pathology assessment was reduced by 87.8% and 70.6%, respectively. The polyp-based strategy provided 93.7% of patients with immediate surveillance interval recommendations vs 76.1% for optical diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

The polyp-based strategy achieved almost perfect surveillance interval agreement compared with pathology-based assignments, significantly reduced the number of required pathology evaluations, and provided most patients with immediate surveillance interval recommendations.