Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling to inform dosing regimens and routes of administration of rifampicin and colistin combination against Acinetobacter baumannii

BACKGROUND

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) is resistant to major antibiotics such as penicillin, cephalosporin, fluoroquinolone and aminoglycoside, and has become a significant nosocomial pathogen. The efficacy of rifampicin and colistin combination against CRAB could be dependent on the administration routes and drug concentrations at the site of infection.

OBJECTIVE

The objective is to predict drug disposition in biological tissues. Treatment efficacy is extrapolated by assessing respective pharmacodynamic (PD) indices, as well as parameters associated with the emergence of resistance.

METHODS

Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models of rifampicin and colistin were utilized to predict tissue exposures. Dosing regimens and administration routes for combination therapy were evaluated in terms of in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of A. baumannii associated with targeted PD indices and resistance parameters.

RESULTS

Simulated exposures in blood, heart, lung, skin and brain were consistent with reported penetration rates. The results demonstrated that a combination of colistin and rifampicin using conventional intravenous (i.v.) doses could achieve effective exposures in the blood and skin. However, for lung infections, colistin by inhalation would be required due to low lung penetration from intravenous route. Inhaled colistin alone provided good PD coverage but this practice could encourage the emergence of additional resistance which may be overcome by a combination regimen that includes inhaled colistin.

CONCLUSION

This in silico extrapolation provides valuable information on dosing regimens and routes of administration against CRAB infections in specific tissues. The PBPK modeling approach could be a non-invasive way to inform therapeutic benefits of combination antimicrobial therapy.

The combination effect of meropenem/sulbactam/polymyxin-B on the pharmacodynamic parameters for mutant selection windows against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

The objective of this study was to evaluate whether combinations of sulbactam, meropenem, and polymyxin-B could reduce or close the gap of mutant selection window (MSW) of individual antibiotics against Acinetobacter baumannii harboring OXA-23. MICs of three antimicrobials used alone and in combination (meropenem/polymyxin-B or meropenem/polymyxin-B/sulbactam) were obtained in 11 clinical isolates and mutant prevention concentrations were determined in 4 of the 11 isolates. All isolates were resistant to meropenem or polymyxin-B. Combining meropenem and polymyxin-B with or without sulbactam resulted in synergistic bactericidal activities. Pharmacokinetic (PK) simulations of drug concentrations in the blood and epithelial lining fluid coupled with pharmacodynamic (PD) evaluations revealed that the fractions of time over the 24-h in terms of free drug concentration within the MSW (fT_MSW) and above the MPC (fT_>MPC) were optimized by combination therapy. The resultant clinical regimens of meropenem, polymyxin-B, and sulbactam evaluated in the PK-PD analysis were 2 g q8h, 2.5 mg/kg loading dose followed by 1.5 mg/kg q12h, and 3 g q8h, respectively, in patients with normal renal function. Subsequent corresponding equivalent exposure regimens would depend on the extent of renal failure. The overall results indicate that combination antibiotics consisting of sulbactam/meropenem/polymyxin-B can confer potential efficacy against A. baumannii harboring OXA-23, and reduce the opportunity for bacteria to develop further resistance. This study provides a framework for pharmacodynamic evaluation of drug-resistant mutant suppression in an antimicrobial co-administration setting. The results thereby lay the groundwork for additional studies and future clinical confirmation is warranted.

Metabolomic profiling of polymyxin-B in combination with meropenem and sulbactam against multi-drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

Empirical therapies using polymyxins combined with other antibiotics are recommended in the treatment of Acinetobacter baumannii infections. In the present study, the synergistic activities of polymyxin-B, meropenem, and sulbactam as combination therapy were investigated using metabolomic analysis. The metabolome of A. baumannii was investigated after treatment with polymyxin-B alone (2 mg/l), meropenem (2 mg/l) alone, combination of polymyxin-B/meropenem at their clinical breakpoints, and triple-antibiotic combination of polymyxin-B/meropenem and 4 mg/l sulbactam. The triple-antibiotic combination significantly changed the metabolite levels involved in cell outer membrane and cell wall biosynthesis, including fatty acid, glycerophospholipid, lipopolysaccharide, peptidoglycan, and nucleotide within 15 min of administration. In contrast, significant changes in metabolome were observed after 1 h in sample treated with either meropenem or polymyxin-B alone. After 1 h of administration, the double and triple combination therapies significantly disrupted nucleotide and amino acid biosynthesis pathways as well as the central carbon metabolism, including pentose phosphate and glycolysis/gluconeogenesis pathways, and tricarboxylic acid cycle. The addition of sulbactam to polymyxin-B and meropenem combination appeared to be an early disruptor of A. baumannii metabolome, which paves the way for further antibiotic penetration into bacteria cells. Combination antibiotics consisting of sulbactam/meropenem/polymyxin-B can effectively confer susceptibility to A. baumannii harboring OXA-23 and other drug resistant genes. Metabolomic profiling reveals underlying mechanisms of synergistic effects of polymyxin-B combined with meropenem and sulbactam against multi-drug resistant A. baumannii.

Prediction of Tissue Exposures of Meropenem, Colistin, and Sulbactam in Pediatrics Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling

BACKGROUND

The combination of polymyxins, meropenem, and sulbactam demonstrated efficacy against multi-drug-resistant bacillus Acinetobacter baumannii. These three antibiotics are commonly used against major blood, skin, lung, and heart muscle infections.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to predict drug disposition and extrapolate the efficacy in these tissues using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling approach that linked drug exposures to their target pharmacodynamic indices associated with antimicrobial activities against A. baumannii.

METHODS

An adult physiologically based pharmacokinetic model was developed for meropenem, colistin, and sulbactam and scaled to pediatrics accounting for both renal and non-renal clearances. The model reliability was evaluated by comparing simulated plasma and tissue drug exposures to observed data. Target pharmacodynamic indices were used to evaluate whether pediatric and adult dosing regimens provided sufficient coverage.

RESULTS

The modeled plasma drug exposures in adults and pediatric patients were consistent with reported literature data. The mean fold errors for meropenem, colistin, and sulbactam were in the range of 0.710-1.37, 0.981-1.47, and 0.647-1.39, respectively. Simulated exposures in the blood, skin, lung, and heart were consistent with reported penetration rates. In a virtual pediatric population aged from 2 to < 18 years, the interpretive breakpoints were achieved in 85-90% of subjects for their targeted pharmacodynamic indices after administration of pediatric dosing regimens consisting of 30 mg/kg of meropenem, and 40 mg/kg of sulbactam three times daily as a 3-h or continuous infusion and 5 mg/kg/day of colistin base activity.

CONCLUSIONS

The physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling supports pediatric dosing regimens of meropenem/colistin/sulbactam in a co-administration setting against infections in the blood, lung, skin, and heart tissues due to A. baumannii.

Revamping the ever-changing landscape of drug development processes in the midst of COVID-19 pandemic

Oncology is the frontline of drug development. The current pharmaceutical pipeline is disproportional focused on oncology, where about 1/3 of all phases of development is in this therapeutic area. The emphasis brings about substantial breakthroughs and has made positive impact on the quality of life. However, oncology remains a threat to human existence. To facilitate this process, a comprehensive list of novel/first molecularly targeted oncology drug approvals by the FDA from 2017 to 2020 is assessed. Here, we focus on molecularly targeted oncology drugs and not cytotoxic ones, although the latter remain important. To achieve this purpose, besides their sponsors, years of approval, drug classes, and cancer indications, clinical significance is included. The results show that approved molecularly targeted drugs span across diverse classes, including small molecule receptor inhibitors, and biologics such as monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, check-point inhibitors (i.e., PD1, PDL1, CTLA4) and CAR-T cell therapies. Although complete cure of cancer remains limited, we have made substantial inroads and more is yet to come. Moreover, many of these new knowledge can be extrapolated to other therapeutic areas, especially to those of currently unmet medical needs such as in neurology and other chronic diseases.

QT Correction: Using an Observed Regression Factor Applicable to a Population Subset

PURPOSE

A QT interval correction to standardized heart rate (QTc) is essential to compare drug effect or to mitigate cardiac risk in clinical practice. Numerous empirical formulas for QTc have been proposed. However, an effective and readily comprehensible method has been elusive. As QTc is dependent on demographics, concomitant drugs, health status, autonomic and diurnal variation, the applicability of these methods hinge on the characteristics of a population that is assessed. An individual QTc is ideal, but it requires substantial baseline ECG data and is beyond the scope for initial evaluation. As a compromise, an approach for a 'discontinuous' population subset is suggested. In this article, we outline the challenges of QTc, and select a power function [QTc = QT/{(RR)a}] in which a regression factor a relevant to a particular population subset is used. The formula is similar to the one used in the Bazett's (a=1/2) or Fridericia's (a=1/3) method. The use of this approach is illustrated with two small population subsets separated by age and out- or in-patient status. This QTc approach is relatively simple to implement in drug development or by a busy practitioner within his/her institution. Nevertheless, in view of the limitations of the illustrative sample size and confounding factors of this proposal, additional studies will be necessary for further evaluation of QTc methods.

Reciprocating dialysis tube method: Periodic tapping improved in vitro release/dissolution testing of suppositories

The reciprocating dialysis tube (RDT) method can be used for in vitro release/dissolution testing of suppositories and has been reported to show good in vitro and in vivo correlation. However, for suppositories with viscous excipients, the result remains variable and generally under-predicts in vivo absorption. The purpose of this study was to assess whether periodic tapping of the closure of the RDT could improve in vitro release testing of suppositories. Two commercially available acetaminophen suppositories (A and B) that showed characteristic release behavior under normal rectal temperatures (37 and 38 degrees C) were chosen as test suppositories. In the absence of tapping, suppository A showed different release profiles at 37 and 38 degrees C, but the difference disappeared with periodic tapping. This finding was consistent with minimum temperature effect in the rectal absorption of suppository A in rabbits. Suppository B showed distinct release profiles at 37 and 38 degrees C irrespective of tapping, and the rectal absorption of suppository B in rabbits was affected by temperature. The test variability (CV% and ranges of release values) was substantially reduced in the presence of tapping. In conclusion, the addition of periodic tapping to RDT method developed in this study could improve in vitro release testing of suppositories.

Safety and pharmacology of oseltamivir in clinical use

Oseltamivir is a novel agent approved for the treatment and prevention of influenza infection and illnesses in adults and children. Assessment of data from the clinical trial programme, a US health insurance database study and postmarketing surveillance allowed a comprehensive review of the safety of oseltamivir in clinical use in subjects >1 year of age. Oseltamivir has been studied over the course of a 5-year development programme in >11000 subjects from North America, Europe and the Southern Hemisphere, including otherwise healthy adults, approximately 500 elderly/high-risk subjects, and children (>1000) aged 1-12 years. Safety evaluations included treatment-emergent adverse events, hospitalisations and deaths, as well as haematological and biochemical laboratory safety tests. The data reveals that oseltamivir has simple, uncomplicated pharmacology and lacks potential for drug-drug interactions. Electrocardiogram parameters, including corrected QT interval, were unaffected by oseltamivir even at high doses. Postmarketing studies confirmed that transient gastrointestinal disturbance is the major adverse effect of oseltamivir and that this can be reduced by taking oseltamivir after a light snack. On treatment serious adverse events were reported in 1.3% of oseltamivir 75mg twice daily, 0.7% of oseltamivir 150 mg twice daily and 1.2% of placebo recipients, respectively, in the clinical trial programme. Postmarketing, it is estimated that, to date, over 4 million oseltamivir prescriptions have been dispensed worldwide. Approximately 2300 spontaneous reports were received by the manufacturer over the three winter seasons of use. As these events are reported infrequently and from an unknown number of users, it is not possible to definitively assess causality or frequency of reported events. Most reports were of gastrointestinal and skin reactions. However, a clear association between the skin reactions and oseltamivir has not been established. A large study of insurance records, which permitted the assessment of the relative risk of medical events treated in the month following prescription of oseltamivir in general use, showed no evidence of increased risk of cardiac, neuropsychiatric or respiratory events for those receiving oseltamivir compared with those who did not. To conclude, no important safety concerns have evolved which might limit the suitability of oseltamivir for the treatment and prevention of influenza in all patient populations.

Pharmacokinetics of anti-influenza prodrug oseltamivir in children aged 1-5 years

OBJECTIVE

The prodrug oseltamivir has been shown to be efficacious and safe for the treatment of influenza for patients 1 year of age or older; however, pharmacokinetic information was lacking for children below 5 years of age. This study was conducted to assess the metabolic and excretory capacity of oseltamivir and its active carboxylate metabolite in young children.

METHODS

Twelve healthy children aged 1-5 years received a single oral suspension dose of oseltamivir (45 mg for 3-5 years, 30 mg for 1-2 years). Plasma and urine concentrations of oseltamivir and the carboxylate were determined by means of liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

Mean peak plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve values normalized to milligram per kilogram oseltamivir dose in the 1- to 2-year group are lower than those in the 3- to 5-year group. Mean body weight normalized oral clearance of oseltamivir and its carboxylate in younger subjects aged 1-2 years (259 ml/min/kg and 12.2 ml/min/kg) were, respectively, 52% and 30% higher than those in older subjects aged 3-5 years (170 ml/min/kg and 9.4 ml/min/kg).

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrate that infants as young as 1 year old can metabolize and excrete oseltamivir efficiently. The data derived from this study provide the starting dose of oseltamivir for further investigation in an efficacy study among influenza-infected infants less than 1 year of age.

Pharmacokinetics and delivery of the anti-influenza prodrug oseltamivir to the small intestine and colon using site-specific delivery capsules

This study investigated the site-specific absorption of oseltamivir using targeted delivery and gamma scintigraphy. On four separate occasions, nine healthy male subjects each received a single 150 mg of oseltamivir administered via the Enterion capsule to the stomach, proximal small bowel, distal small bowel and the ascending colon. Pharmacokinetic parameters of oseltamivir and its carboxylate metabolite show that absorption was similar in the proximal and distal small bowel compared to stomach delivery, but reduced from the ascending colon, demonstrating that absorption-rate limited disposition occurred only for the ascending colon. The metabolite-to-parent ratios were minimally reduced. The results support the feasibility of modified-release formulation development whilst confirming the high and consistent oral bioavailability of oseltamivir.

Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between the oral anti-influenza neuraminidase inhibitor prodrug oseltamivir and antacids

AIMS

Oseltamivir is an oral ester prodrug of its active metabolite Ro 64-0802, a potent and selective neuraminidase inhibitor of the influenza virus. The object of this study was to evaluate whether the oral absorption of oseltamivir was reduced in the presence of two main classes of antacid, Maalox(R) suspension (containing magnesium hydroxide and aluminium hydroxide) and Titralac(R) tablets (containing calcium carbonate).

METHODS

Twelve healthy volunteers completed a randomized, single dose, three-period crossover study. Each volunteer received in a fasted state, 150 mg oseltamivir alone (Treatment A), 150 mg oseltamivir with a 20 ml Maalox suspension (Treatment B), and 150 mg oseltamivir with four Titralac tablets (Treatment C), with 7-10 days washout in between treatments. Plasma and urine concentrations of oseltamivir and Ro 64-0802 were measured using a validated h.p.l.c./MS/MS assay. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated for oseltamivir and Ro 64-0802. Since antacids are locally acting drugs and generally not expected to be absorbed substantially into the systemic system, no plasma or urine concentrations of antacids were measured.

RESULTS

Bioequivalence was achieved for the primary pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax and AUC(0, infinity ) of Ro 64-0802 following administration of oseltamivir with either Maalox suspension or Titralac(R) tablets vs administration of oseltamivir alone. The bioavailability (90% confidence intervals) of Ro 64-0802 following administration of oseltamivir together with Maalox suspension vs administration of oseltamivir alone, was 90% (83.6, 96.9%) for C(max) and 94.1% (91.4, 96.9%) for AUC(0, infinity); similarly, for Titralac tablets, the equivalent values were 95.1% (88.3, 102%) for C(max) and 94.7% (91.9, 97.5%) for AUC(0, infinity).

CONCLUSIONS

The coadministration of either Maalox suspension or Titralac tablets with oseltamivir has no effect on the pharmacokinetics of either oseltamivir or Ro 64-0802, and conversely, there is no evidence that coadministration with oseltamivir has an effect on the safety and tolerability of either Maalox suspension or Titralac tablets. There was no pharmacokinetic interaction between oseltamivir with either antacid, demonstrating that the oral absorption of oseltamivir was not impaired in the presence of antacids containing magnesium, aluminium or calcium.

Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between the oral anti-influenza prodrug oseltamivir and aspirin

Twelve volunteers completed a two-sequence, three-way crossover study of a single 900-mg aspirin dose and multiple doses of 75 mg of oseltamivir in the absence and presence of 900 mg of aspirin. The plasma and urine results demonstrated no pharmacokinetic interaction between oseltamivir and aspirin.

The anti-influenza drug oseltamivir exhibits low potential to induce pharmacokinetic drug interactions via renal secretion-correlation of in vivo and in vitro studies

Oseltamivir is an ester prodrug of the active metabolite [3R,4R,5S]-4-acetamido-5-amino-3-(1-ethylpropoxy)-1-cyclohexene-1-carboxylate phosphate (Ro 64-0802), a potent and selective inhibitor of neuraminidase enzyme of influenza virus. Oseltamivir is rapidly hydrolyzed by hepatic carboxylesterases to Ro 64-0802, which is then exclusively excreted by glomerular filtration and active tubular secretion without further metabolism. In vivo and in vitro studies were conducted to evaluate the renal drug-drug interaction potential of oseltamivir. Crossover studies were conducted in healthy subjects in which oral oseltamivir was administered alone and coadministered with probenecid, cimetidine, or amoxicillin. Probenecid completely blocked the renal secretion of Ro 64-0802, increasing systemic exposure (area under the curve) by 2.5-fold, but no interaction was observed with cimetidine or amoxicillin. These in vivo data show that Ro 64-0802 is secreted via an organic anion pathway, but Ro 64-0802 does not inhibit amoxicillin renal secretion. In vitro effects of Ro 64-0802 on the human renal organic anionic transporter 1 (hOAT1) were investigated using novel Chinese hamster ovary cells stably transfected with hOAT1. Ro 64-0802 was found to be a low-efficiency substrate for hOAT1 and a very weak inhibitor of hOAT1-mediated transport of p-aminohippuric acid (PAH). Ro 64-0802 did not inhibit the hOAT1-mediated transport of amoxicillin. In contrast, probenecid effectively inhibited the transport of PAH, Ro 64-0802, and amoxicillin via hOAT1. These in vitro observations are consistent with the in vivo data, validating the usefulness of the in vitro system for evaluating such drug-drug interaction. The study results demonstrate that oseltamivir has a low drug-drug interaction potential at the renal tubular level due to inhibition of hOAT1.

Pharmacokinetics and dosage recommendations for an oseltamivir oral suspension for the treatment of influenza in children

OBJECTIVE

Oseltamivir (Ro 64-0796) is an ester prodrug of the active metabolite Ro 64-0802 (oseltamivir carboxylate), a potent and selective inhibitor of the neuraminidase enzyme of influenza virus. In this study we report the pharmacokinetics of oseltamivir in healthy children volunteers (study 1) and in children with influenza (study 2).

STUDY PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

In study 1, an open-label, single dose study, serial plasma samples were obtained from a total of 18 healthy children (5 to 18 years) who were grouped by age (n = 6 per group) and received single oral doses of oseltamivir 2 mg/kg. In study 2, a randomised, placebo controlled phase III study in paediatric children (1 to 12 years) presenting with influenza symptoms, 199 pharmacokinetic sparse samples were obtained from 87 patients, and serial samples were obtained from 5 patients. Pooled data were compared with those from adult studies.

RESULTS

Children (1 to 12 years) eliminated the active metabolite faster than both adolescents (13 to 18 years) and adults, resulting in lower exposure to the active drug. In these children, oseltamivir 2 mg/kg twice daily resulted in drug exposures within the range associated with tolerability and efficacy in adults administered approximately 1 mg/kg twice daily. Unit doses of oseltamivir 30, 45 and 60mg oral suspension are recommended twice daily in children weighing < or =15 kg (or < or =33 lb, aged 1 to 3 years), > 15 to 23 kg (or >33 to 51 lb, aged 4 to 7 years) and >23 to 40 kg (or >51 to 88 lb, aged 8 to 12 years), respectively. A 75 mg capsule may be a viable dosage formulation in children (e.g. over 8 years of age) who are able to swallow solid dosage forms.

CONCLUSIONS

Young children cleared the active metabolite oseltamivir carboxylate at a faster rate than older children and adults. Convenient administration recommendations for the oseltamivir oral suspension in children are possible to maintain drug exposure within the target window.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of once-daily regimens of soft-gel capsule saquinavir plus minidose ritonavir in human immunodeficiency virus-negative adults

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) protease inhibitors have dramatically improved treatment options for HIV infection, but frequent dosing may impact adherence to highly active antiretroviral treatment regimens (HAART). Previous studies demonstrated that combined therapy with ritonavir and saquinavir allows a decrease in frequency of saquinavir dosing to twice daily. In this study, we evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetics of combining once-daily doses of the soft-gel capsule (SGC) formulation of saquinavir (saquinavir-SGC) and minidose ritonavir. Forty-four healthy HIV-negative volunteers were randomized into groups receiving once-daily doses of saquinavir-SGC (1,200 to 1,800 mg) plus ritonavir (100 to 200 mg) or a control group receiving only saquinavir-SGC (1,200 mg) three times daily. Saquinavir-SGC alone and saquinavir-SGC-ritonavir combinations were generally well tolerated, and there were no safety concerns. Addition of ritonavir (100 mg) to saquinavir-SGC (1,200 to 1,800 mg/day) increased the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) for saquinavir severalfold, and the intersubject peak concentration in plasma and AUC variability were reduced compared to those achieved with saquinavir-SGC alone (3,600 mg/day), while trough saquinavir levels (24 h post-dose) were substantially higher than the 90% inhibitory concentration calculated from HIV-1 clinical isolates. Neither increasing the saquinavir-SGC dose to higher than 1,600 mg nor increasing ritonavir from 100 to 200 mg appeared to further enhance the AUC. These results suggest that an all once-daily HAART regimen, utilizing saquinavir-SGC plus a more tolerable low dose of ritonavir, may be feasible. Studies of once-daily saquinavir-SGC (1,600 mg) in combination with ritonavir (100 mg) in HIV-infected patients are underway.

Clonazepam and sertraline: absence of drug interaction in a multiple-dose study

Thirteen subjects (seven men, six women) completed a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, crossover study to determine whether an interaction occurs between clonazepam and sertraline. Ten days of once-daily doses of either clonazepam 1 mg and placebo (CZ + PL) or clonazepam 1 mg and sertraline 100 mg (CZ + SR) were administered; there was an 11-day washout period. Sertraline did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of clonazepam (p > 0.13). Clonazepam apparent oral clearance, volume of distribution, and half-life were 3.9 +/- 0.2 L/hr, 233 +/-11 L, and 40.5 +/- 0.3 hours, respectively. The kinetics of the inactive metabolite 7-aminoclonazepam were marginally affected by sertraline, with a 21% decrease in the elimination half-life (p = 0.03) relative to CZ + PL and no significant difference between treatments in area under the curve or metabolite ratio. Card sorting (CS), digit-symbol substitution test (DSST), nurse-rated sedation scale (NRSS), and self-rated sedation scores were assessed four times daily on days -1 (PL + PL), 1, 4, 7, and 10. There were no differences between treatments in area under the effect curve or maximum observed effect for CS, DSST, or NRSS. Maximum impairment on all assessment days was low, with a less than 10% change from the drug-free values for CS and DSST. Despite higher clonazepam concentrations, predose (time 0) psychomotor and sedation scores did not differ among days -1, 1, 4, 7, and 10 or between treatments. These results in healthy volunteers indicate that sertraline does not affect the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of clonazepam.