Dysfunctional high-density lipoprotein in chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases

Background

The mechanism explaining low cholesterol concentrations in chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease (CIRD) is incompletely understood. We hypothesized that chronic inflammation impairs the functionality of high-density lipoprotein (HDL), for example, by oxidative processes.

Objectives

Assessment of oxidized HDL (HDLox), a marker of dysfunctional HDL, in newly diagnosed patients with CIRD before and after initiation of immunosuppressive therapy and comparison of HDLox values of patients with CIRD to non-CIRD controls.

Design

Prospective observational trial.

Methods

The study was conducted on 44 newly diagnosed CIRD patients, who were initiated on immunosuppressive therapy (baseline). A total of 136 patients without CIRD served as control. Lipid profiles including HDLox levels and C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured in both groups at baseline. In CIRD patients, measurements were repeated 12 weeks after baseline. Validated outcome tools for disease activity and function were assessed at baseline and 12 weeks.

Results

A total of 33 (75%) patients with rheumatoid arthritis, 7(16%) with axial spondyloarthritis, and 4 (9%) with systemic lupus erythematosus were included. Groups were comparable for age and BMI. CIRD patients had higher HDLox concentrations (1.57 versus 0.78, p = 0.02) and tended to have lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and cholesterol concentrations compared to controls. HDLox (1.57 versus 1.4, p = 0.26) and CRP levels (2.1 versus 0.7 mg/dl, p < 0.01) decreased in CIRD patients from baseline to follow-up.

Conclusion

CIRD is associated with an impairment of the anti-inflammatory properties of HDL as reflected by an increase in HDLox concentrations. This effect may contribute to the increased cardiovascular risk in chronic inflammatory diseases.

Psychological Responses to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic in Renal Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Renal transplant recipients are at increased risk for an adverse course of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), most likely due to immunosuppression and the high level of cardiovascular comorbidity. Many transplant recipients are aware of these facts. The psychological effects of this knowledge, however, remain elusive.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study on 62 renal transplant recipients. Fifty cardiovascular outpatients without immunosuppression and 55 healthy subjects served as control. We performed a focused psychological assessment during the pandemic (April 2020) and compared the data with a time 6 months before. Additionally, an intergroup analysis was performed for the data during the pandemic. The analysis was performed by means of a questionnaire derived from KPD-38. We extracted 5 questions focusing on the parameters "life satisfaction" and perceived "action competence." Life satisfaction score ranged from 2 to 8, and the score for action competence from 5 to 20.

RESULTS

Both life satisfaction and perceived action competence were significantly lower during the pandemic than 6 months before in all the 3 groups (P < .005 each). During the pandemic median levels of life satisfaction did not significantly differ between the 3 groups (transplant recipients 6, interquartile range [IQR] 4-7; cardiovascular patients 5, IQR: 4-6; healthy controls 6, IQR 5-7; Kruskal-Wallis P > .05). In contrast, the perceived action competence was higher in healthy subjects (15, IQR 12-17) than in both renal transplant recipients (13, IQR 10-15) and cardiovascular patients (13, IQR 8-14, Kruskal-Wallis P = .0003).

CONCLUSION

The COVID-19 pandemic has negative effects on life satisfaction and perceived action competence in renal transplant recipients, cardiovascular patients without immunosuppression, and healthy subjects. The effects on life satisfaction in transplant recipients did not differ from nonimmunocompromised patients or healthy controls. In contrast, the feeling of reduced action competence exceeded healthy controls, most likely due to a subjective need for stricter social distancing to avoid infection.

Vaccination Against Urinary Tract Infection After Renal Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs) increase mortality and reduce graft survival after renal transplantation. Because current prophylactic strategies such as methionine, cranberry juice, and antibiotics fail to sufficiently prevent recurrent infections in a substantial number of patients, there is a clinical need for alternative approaches. The present work describes first experiences with an immunization strategy against bacterial strains after kidney transplantation.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective single-center analysis of an immunization approach against 10 strains of inactivated bacteria (StroVac). A total of 14 renal transplant recipients with 3 or more UTI episodes/year underwent immunization with 3 subcutaneous injections of inactivated bacteria (follow-up 12 months before to 12 months after immunization). These patients were compared to 14 renal transplant patients without immunization who were matched for number of UTIs and time after transplantation (24 months follow-up). We compared the UTI incidence and potential side effects, including development of de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSA).

RESULTS

The immunization significantly decreased the incidence of UTIs from 3.4 ± 1.3 to 0.9 ± 1.0 by 74.9%. The incidence did not change from year 1 to year 2 of the observation period in the control group. Immunization was tolerated well, without any clinical complaints. There were no de novo DSAs in the first year after immunization.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunization against inactivated bacterial strains substantially reduced the incidence of UTIs without eliciting any safety concerns in this small cohort of renal transplant recipients. This strategy may be a helpful expansion of our preventive measures in patients with recurrent UTIs.