Effects of ceramic layer thickness, cement color, and abutment tooth color on color reproduction of feldspathic veneers

AIM

To optimize the esthetics of ceramic restorations, it is important to determine accurately the effects of various parameters on the final color of the restoration. However, there is a lack of information on what determines the color of translucent feldspathic veneers formed using ceramics such as Vita Mark II. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of the ceramic layer thickness, cement color, and abutment tooth color on the color of the feldspathic ceramic veneer restoration.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 30 all-ceramic monolithic veneers (Vita Mark II) were fabricated using a CAD/CAM system. The crowns were divided into three groups of differing ceramic thickness (0.4-, 0.7-, and 1.0-mm thick). Each type of crown was seated on six different-colored abutment teeth (1M1 [reference], 1M2, 2M2, 3M2, 4M2, and 5M2) using seven different try-in paste colors. The color of the resulting restoration was evaluated using spectrophotometry with a spot-measurement device (Vita Easyshade Advance 4.0). Color data are expressed in CIE L*a*b* system coordinates, and color differences ΔE relative to the reference tooth were calculated and analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the Bonferroni post hoc test at α = 0.05.

RESULTS

The color difference ΔE of the feldspathic all-ceramic veneer system was significantly affected by the thickness of the ceramic layer, the cement color, and the abutment tooth color (P < 0.05). The smallest values of ΔE compared with the reference color were found when try-in pastes shade -3 was used. As the thickness of the ceramic layer increased, a significant decrease in ΔE was found. As the color of the abutment tooth varied from light to dark, a significant increase was found in ΔE.

CONCLUSION

The thickness of the ceramic layer, the cement color, and the abutment tooth color significantly affected the color of the resulting CAD/CAM feldspathic ceramic veneer restoration.

Dental color matching: A comparison between visual and instrumental methods

The aim of this study was to compare the agreement rate (%) and color difference (ΔE*ab) of three dental color-measuring devices, with the visual shade identification. The tooth color were determined by two operators, which were advised to select a VITA classic shade tab in each other's agreement. The Shadepilot (SP), CrystalEye (CE) and ShadeVision (SV) were used to measure tooth color. Statistically analyses include agreement rate (%), color difference (ΔE*ab), McNemar test (p=0.05), Student's t-test (p=0.05) and Bland Altman scatterplots. The SP had an agreement of 56.3% with the visual shade determination, the CE 49.0% and SV 51.3%. ΔE*ab of the visually and instrumentally selected shade tabs and natural teeth were frequently above the threshold for acceptability. Comparing both methods, for SP ΔE*ab values differ in a range of clinical acceptability.

Comparison of visual shade matching and electronic color measurement device

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the performance of visual shade matching and spectrophotometric measurements.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 100 observers matched pairs of corresponding shade tabs from two VITA classical A1-D4 shade guides. The tab identifiers on one shade guide were masked. Lack of visible color differences between the corresponding tabs was confirmed by means of an intraoral spectrophotometer. Means and standard deviations were calculated. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) (α = 0.05) with a Bonferroni correction was performed to detect significance of differences between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 72.5% of tab pairs (or 11.6 tabs) were matched using the visual method, and 98.9% were matched using the spectrophotometer (P < 0.001). Female observers showed significantly better results than male observers (P = 0.027). Both genders showed the highest visual scores in group B, followed by groups C, A, and D.

CONCLUSIONS

Instrumental shade-matching systems have the potential to improve color matching in dentistry. Results were influenced by gender.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The dental spectrophotometer exhibited a significantly higher percentage of correct matches of corresponding shade tabs compared with conventional visual shade matching.

Interdevice agreement of eight equivalent dental color measurement devices

OBJECTIVES

The reproducibility of electronic color-measuring devices used in dentistry refers to the consistency of measurements of a single device and also that between identical devices. This in vitro study evaluated the short-term interdevice agreement of eight equivalent dental measurement devices.

METHODS

The short-term repeatability of eight identical VITA Easyshade Advance color measurement devices was evaluated. Each device was used to quantify the Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage (CIE) L*a*b* color coordinates of ceramic disks, designed in accordance with guidelines set by the VITA Toothguide 3D-Master shade tab organization. Statistical analysis involved calculating the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and color differences (ΔE*) for corresponding measurements taken by the devices. In addition, the mean color difference from the mean (MCDM) was calculated for each color.

RESULTS

All devices showed high ICCs for the color coordinates (L = 0.996, a = 0.993, b = 0.999). The ΔE* by shade ranged from 0.62 to 1.67. The MCDM by color-measuring device ranged from 0.11 to 0.23.

CONCLUSION

This in vitro study showed that the color-measuring devices used were suitable for determining shade with high repeatability.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The high interdevice agreement of the VITA Easyshade Advance means that dental professionals can use this device independently, without compromising the consistency and quality of color measurements.

Retentive strength of monolithic all-ceramic crowns on implant abutments

The aim of the study was to determine the retentive strength of monolithic all-ceramic crowns cemented on titanium implant abutments. 225 crowns (75 crowns each of Mark II, Empress CAD, and e.max CAD) were milled using a CAD/ CAM system. The crowns were cemented onto sandblasted titanium implant abutments using five luting agents (Multilink Implant, Variolink II, RelyX Unicem, Fujicem, and Panavia 2.0). After thermocycling, the crowns were removed using a universal testing machine. The location of luting agent residue on the abutment and inner crown surfaces was evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA with the Bonferroni correction. In comparing the luting agents, no significant difference was found between Vita Mark II and Empress CAD. For e.max CAD, the luting agent RelyX Unicem had a significantly higher mean retentive strength than did Multilink Implant (p = 0.003) or Panavia 2.0 (p = 0.001). In comparing the ceramic materials, e.max CAD showed significantly higher pull-off strengths than the other two ceramic materials when the luting agents RelyX Unicem and Fujicem were used (all p < 0.001). The residues of nearly all luting agents were located entirely or almost entirely (75%-100%) on the inner crown surfaces of all ceramic materials, except for the luting agent GC Fujicem, which left more luting agent residue (0%-75%) on the abutment surfaces of all ceramic materials. In comparing the five luting agents, significant differences in the resulting retentive strength were only found for the ceramic material e.max CAD. The other ceramic materials did not show significant differences in retentive strength, independent of the luting agent.

Are dental color measuring devices CIE compliant?

OBJECTIVES

This in vitro study evaluated the accordance of dental color measurement devices with a Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage (CIE)-compliant reference system, by comparing the CIE lightness, chroma, and hue (L*C*h°) color coordinates of ceramic samples.

METHODS

Four color measurement devices: Vita Easyshade® Advance (A); DeguDent Shadepilot™ (B); X-Rite® Shadevision (C); and Crystaleye Olympus (D), were compared with a CIE-compliant reference system by recording the L*C*h° color coordinates of ceramic samples matching the tooth colors of the Vita Linearguide 3D-Master®, under standardized test conditions. Differences between regression lines for the dental color measurement device data and regression lines for the CIE-compliant reference system data were evaluated.

RESULTS

All devices offered high intraclass correlation coefficients (0.9771- 0.9999) for the L*C*h° color coordinates. The regression lines of the L* and C* coordinates for device A were steeper than those of the CIE-compliant reference system; the regression lines for devices B, C, and D were nearly parallel to those of the reference system, but with an offset. The regression lines of the h° coordinates for all devices were almost parallel to those of the reference system, with slopes near 1. Excluding the L* and h° coordinate measurements of device A, the measurements with the devices exhibited deviations from the reference system that were greater than those expected by chance (P < 0.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

The dental color measurement devices assessed here offered excellent reproducibility, but showed significant deviations from the CIE-compliant reference system regarding the L*C*h° color coordinates.

Repeatability of color-measuring devices

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to evaluate the intra- and interdevice repeatability in different tooth regions using three color-measuring devices under clinical conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifteen shade measurements (cervical, body, incisal) were recorded on 15 patients by one investigator using three color-measuring devices (VITA Easyshade compact, DeguDent Shadepilot, X-Rite ShadeVision). CIE Lab values were determined for all maxillary anterior teeth. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to statistically analyze intra-and inter-device repeatability for different tooth regions. Color differences (ΔE) between measurements were also computed to evaluate the clinical acceptability of repeatability values. The data were evaluated using analysis of variance and Bonferroni's adjustment to control for multiple testing. Differences were deemed significant when P < 0.016.

RESULTS

The three color-measuring devices generally exhibited high repeatability of color coordinates for all tooth regions (ICC > 0.516-0.986, ΔE < 3.03). In contrast, inter-device repeatability was lower for all tooth regions (ICC = 0.010-0.922, ΔE = 4.06-16.04).

CONCLUSIONS

High intra-device repeatability of color coordinates could be achieved for all tooth regions when the same color-measuring device was used. However, because of low inter-device repeatability, results using different color-measuring devices are not comparable.