If only they knew! A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial comparing deceptive and open-label placebo in healthy individuals

BACKGROUND

Placebo use is widespread in clinical practice. However, they are most often administered deceptively rather than openly. It is often suggested that open-label placebos (OLP) are less effective than deceptive placebos (DP). This study aimed to compare the use of DP and OLP treatments to reduce pain in healthy volunteers.

METHODS

We conducted a non-inferiority, parallel, randomized, controlled trial, which also included a nested cross-over no-treatment condition. This study was conducted at a university clinic in France.

RESULTS

We included 60 subjects and the main result shows that the OLP was not inferior to the DP by a margin of 10 mm. The mean difference between both groups regarding intensity of pain was 0.7 mm with a 95% compatibility interval (95% CI) of ]-∞; 5.4], and 97.5% CI of ]-∞; 6.3]. Secondary outcomes require cautious interpretation of the effect of placebo versus no treatment due to a time-treatment interaction.

CONCLUSION

The study indicates that OLP may perform just as well as DP and could provide support for the use of OLP as an ethical alternative to DP when they are to be used in a clinical setting. If only patients knew about the placebo nature of some treatments they are receiving, unnecessary lies could be avoided while maintaining similar placebo effects.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study is the first to show non-inferiority of placebos administered honestly, also called OLP, compared to DP in reducing pain. This suggests that OLP could be as effective as their deceptive counterparts while having the ethical advantage of not being required to lie. If deception is not a necessary condition for efficacy, OLP should be preferred over DP.

Triplet chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab as first line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: An AGEO multicenter real-world study

BACKGROUND

Prior trials validated triplet chemotherapy (Tri-CT) with bevacizumab as first line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) but real-world data are scarce and practices remain heterogeneous.

AIMS

To evaluate Tri-CT +/- bevacizumab efficacy and safety, and to identify factors influencing treatment decisions.

METHODS

The COLOTRIP retrospective study enrolled mCRC patients treated from 2014 to 2019 in 14 French centers.

RESULTS

Of 299 patients (81% PS 0-1, 58% RAS-mutated and 19% BRAF-mutated), 51% received Tri-CT and 49% Tri-CT + bevacizumab. Metastatic disease was classified as resectable (6.5%), potentially resectable (40%), and unresectable (54%). Bevacizumab use was associated with primary tumor location, mutational status and number of metastases. Median overall survival was 33.5 months in the Tri-CT group and 23.9 months in the Tri-CT + bevacizumab group, with median progression-free survival being 14.5 and 11.4 months. After adjusting for initial characteristics, no difference in survival was noted. Around 30% of patients experienced grade ≥3 adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights several factors influencing Tri-CT use +/- bevacizumab decision and confirms the real-world good oncological outcomes and tolerability of these regimens in mCRC patients. Our results suggest that Tri-CT alone may by an appropriate option for specific subgroups of patients.

Randomized phase III study of nivolumab and ipilimumab versus carboplatin-based doublet in first-line treatment of PS 2 or elderly (≥ 70 years) patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer (Energy-GFPC 06-2015 study)

9011

Background: Combination of anti-PD1 and CTLA4 have showed superiority to chemotherapy (CT) in advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but data for fit elderly or PS2 patients are scarce. Methods: eNErgy compared the combination of nivolumab ipilimumab (N-I) to a platinum doublet in elderly or PS2 patients with advanced NSCLC. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. Main inclusion criteria were: stage IV histologically proven NSCLC, age ≥ 70 y, and PS 0/1/2 or age < 70 and PS2, EGFR ALK/ROS1 negative, judged fit enough to receive a platinum doublet. The main exclusion criteria were active cerebral metastasis or contraindication to N-I. Patients were randomly selected 1/1, stratified by age (≥ 70 vs. < 70 y), PS (0/1 vs. 2), and histology (squamous vs. no-squamous). Nivolumab (240 mg, 2w), ipilimumab, 1 mg/kg, 6w, was administrated until progression or unacceptable toxicity. CT was planned for 4 cycles, with carboplatin (AUC5) and pemetrexed (500 mg/m2, 3w) or paclitaxel (90 mg/m2, d1,d8, d15); 242 patients had to be randomized to detect a treatment effect hazard ratio (HR) on OS of 0.65, with a 85% power at a 2-sided alpha level of 5%. Results: A preplanned interim analysis carried out after observation of 33% of deaths, out of 174 randomized patients, showed a risk of futility especially for PS 2 patients, HR: 1.8 (95% CI, 0.99-3.3). This led to a halt in randomization but continued follow-up of the 204 patients randomized at the time of the decision. The current final analysis is carried out 18 months after the inclusion of the last patient: men, 71%, median age 74 (51-89, PS 0/1/2 in 30%, 37.5%, and 36.6% respectively), smokers or former smokers in 25.5 and 64.4%, with 62% adenocarcinoma. The median OS of N-I and chemo arms were 14.7 (95% CI, 8.0-19.7) and 9.9 (95% CI, 7.7-12.3) months, HR 0.85, 95% CI, 0.62-1.16. The subgroup analyses showed a significant benefit of the association N-I compared to CT for elderly PS 0/1 patients, with median OS of 22.6 (95% CI, 18.1-36) vs. 11.8 (95% CI, 8.9-20.5) months, p = 0.02. In PS2 patients, median OS of N-I and CT arms was 2.9 (1.4-4.8) vs. 6.1 (3.5-10.4) months (p = 0.22). Median PFS was significantly in favor of N-I arm in the entire population: 5.5 (2.8-8.7) vs. 4.6 (3.5-5.6); p = 0.015. Safety was similar with 31.4% of patients with grade ≥ 3 related SAES in N-I arm vs. 49.5% for CT. Treatment was discontinued for toxicity in 28.6% in N-I arm vs. 22.3% of patients in CT arm. Conclusions: Despite no statistically significant benefit in OS observed in the entire population, there was a clinical signal of efficacy of N-I combination over platinum doublet in elderly NSCLC patients PS 0-1 with a significant benefit of OS of 22.6 months vs. 11.8 for CT arm. Clinical trial information: NCT03351361.

Artificial intelligence and the future of psychiatry: Qualitative findings from a global physician survey

BACKGROUND

The potential for machine learning to disrupt the medical profession is the subject of ongoing debate within biomedical informatics.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore psychiatrists' opinions about the potential impact innovations in artificial intelligence and machine learning on psychiatric practice.

METHODS

In Spring 2019, we conducted a web-based survey of 791 psychiatrists from 22 countries worldwide. The survey measured opinions about the likelihood future technology would fully replace physicians in performing ten key psychiatric tasks. This study involved qualitative descriptive analysis of written responses ("comments") to three open-ended questions in the survey.

RESULTS

Comments were classified into four major categories in relation to the impact of future technology on: (1) patient-psychiatrist interactions; (2) the quality of patient medical care; (3) the profession of psychiatry; and (4) health systems. Overwhelmingly, psychiatrists were skeptical that technology could replace human empathy. Many predicted that 'man and machine' would increasingly collaborate in undertaking clinical decisions, with mixed opinions about the benefits and harms of such an arrangement. Participants were optimistic that technology might improve efficiencies and access to care, and reduce costs. Ethical and regulatory considerations received limited attention.

CONCLUSIONS

This study presents timely information on psychiatrists' views about the scope of artificial intelligence and machine learning on psychiatric practice. Psychiatrists expressed divergent views about the value and impact of future technology with worrying omissions about practice guidelines, and ethical and regulatory issues.

[Second- or third-line treatment with erlotinib in EGFR wild-type non-small cell lung cancer: Real-life data]

INTRODUCTION

The benefit of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for patients with an EGFR wild-type non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial.

METHODS

The survival of patients with an EGFR wild-type NSCLC who received second- or third-line erlotinib treatment was assessed using real-life data that had been collected in a prospective, national, multicenter, non-interventional cohort study.

RESULTS

Data from 274 patients were analysed, 185 (68%) treated with erlotinib and 89 (32%) treated with supportive care only. The median overall survival was 4.2months (95% CI [3.5; 5.4]) with erlotinib, and 1.3months (95% CI [1.0; 1.8]) with supportive care. Survival rate at 3, 6, and 12months was 62%, 37%, and 17%, respectively, with erlotinib, versus 20%, 8%, et 3%, with exclusive supportive care. Significant predictive factors for longer overall survival were the presence of adenocarcinoma, and use of 1st line chemotherapy including either taxanes, pemetrexed or vinorelbine (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Erlotinib remains a valuable therapeutic option to treat inoperable locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC after failure of at least one prior chemotherapy regimen in fragile patients who are not eligible for chemotherapy.

Bevacizumab+chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in elderly patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase II trial-PRODIGE 20 study results

Background

Metastatic colorectal cancer frequently occurs in elderly patients. Bevacizumab in combination with front line chemotherapy (CT) is a standard treatment but some concern raised about tolerance of bevacizumab for these patients. The purpose of PRODIGE 20 was to evaluate tolerance and efficacy of bevacizumab according to specific end points in this population.

Patients and methods

Patients aged 75 years and over were randomly assigned to bevacizumab + CT (BEV) versus CT. LV5FU2, FOLFOX and FOLFIRI regimen were prescribed according to investigator’s choice. The composite co-primary end point, assessed 4 months after randomization, was based on efficacy (tumor control and absence of decrease of the Spitzer QoL index) and safety (absence of severe cardiovascular toxicities and unexpected hospitalization). For each arm, the treatment will be consider as inefficient if 20% or less of the patients met the efficacy criteria and not safe if 40% or less met the safety criteria.

Results

About 102 patients were randomized (51 BEV and 51 CT), median age was 80 years (range 75–91). Primary end point was met for efficacy in 50% and 58% and for safety in 61% and 71% of patients in BEV and CT, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 9.7 months in BEV and 7.8 months in CT. Median overall survival was 21.7 months in BEV and 19.8 months in CT. The 36-month overall survival rate was 27% in BEV and 10.1% in CT. Severe toxicities grade 3/4 were mainly non-hematologic toxicities (80.4% in BEV, 63.3% in CT).

Conclusion

Bevacizumab combined with CT was safe and efficient. Both arms met the primary safety and efficacy criteria.

Prognostic role of a comprehensive geriatric assessment on the management of elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a pooled analysis of two prospective phase II trials by the GFPC Group

Background

The prognostic role of a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) on the management of elderly patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains to be established. The objective of this analysis was to determine the prognostic role of each CGA domain on overall survival (OS) among elderly patients with advanced-stage NSCLC.

Methods

We pooled individual data from two prospective, randomized phases II trials in patients over 65 years old with advanced-stage NSCLC, who were considered fit (0405 trial) or no-fit (0505 trial) based on a CGA. Both trials compared first-line chemotherapy followed by second-line erlotinib with the reverse strategy in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and OS. Factors prognostic of OS were sought by using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log rank test for univariate analysis, and a Cox model for multivariate analysis.

Results

Analysis performed on 194 patients (mean age: 77 years, male gender: 70%, never- or ex-smokers: 56%) showed, in univariate analysis that performance status (PS), smoking status, Charlson, simplified Charlson, nutritional scores, and a mobility score were prognostics of OS. In multivariate analysis, PS [HR: 1.4 (1.02-1.9), P=0.04] and the Charlson score [HR: 1.46 (1.07-1.99), P=0.02] were independently prognostic of OS, while the nutritional score [HR: 0.69 (0.46-1.04), P=0.07] and the mobility score [HR: 0.25 (0.06-1.01), P=0.06] were close to significance.

Conclusions

PS and comorbidities appear to be the main predictors of OS in elderly advanced NSCLC patients selected on the basis of CGA.

Randomized phase III trial in elderly patients comparing LV5FU2 with or without irinotecan for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (FFCD 2001-02)

BACKGROUND

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) frequently occurs in elderly patients. However, data from a geriatric tailored randomized trial about tolerance to and the efficacy of doublet chemotherapy (CT) with irinotecan in the elderly are lacking. The benefit of first-line CT intensification remains an issue in elderly patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Elderly patients (75+) with previously untreated mCRC were randomly assigned in a 2 × 2 factorial design (four arms) to receive 5-FU (5-fluorouracil)-based CT, either alone (FU: LV5FU2 or simplified LV5FU2) or in combination with irinotecan [IRI: LV5FU2-irinotecan or simplified LV5FU2-irinotecan (FOLFIRI)]. The CLASSIC arm was defined as LV5FU2 or LV5FU2-irinotecan and the SIMPLIFIED arm as simplified LV5FU2 or FOLFIRI. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points were overall survival (OS), safety and objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

From June 2003 to May 2010, 71 patients were randomly assigned to LV5FU2, 71 to simplified LV5FU2, 70 to LV5FU2-irinotecan and 70 to FOLFIRI. The median age was 80 years (range 75-92 years). No significant difference was observed for the median PFS: FU 5.2 months versus IRI 7.3 months, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.84 (0.66-1.07), P = 0.15 and CLASSIC 6.5 months versus SIMPLIFIED 6.0 months, HR = 0.85 (0.67-1.09), P = 0.19. The ORR was superior in IRI (P = 0.0003): FU 21.1% versus IRI 41.7% and in CLASSIC (P = 0.04): CLASSIC 37.1% versus SIMPLIFIED 25.6%. Median OS was 14.2 months in FU versus 13.3 months in IRI, HR = 0.96 (0.75-1.24) and 15.2 months in CLASSIC versus 11.4 months in SIMPLIFIED, HR = 0.71 (0.55-0.92). More patients presented grade 3-4 toxicities in IRI (52.2% versus 76.3%).

CONCLUSION

In this elderly population, adding irinotecan to an infusional 5-FU-based CT did not significantly increase either PFS or OS. Classic LV5FU2 was associated with an improved OS compared with simplified LV5FU2.

CLINICALTRIALSGOV

NCT00303771.

Feasibility and clinical impact of re-biopsy in advanced non small-cell lung cancer: a prospective multicenter study in a real-world setting (GFPC study 12-01)

OBJECTIVES

When advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) progresses during first-line treatment, re-biopsy may be indicated to detect a possible new biological profile (comparison to initial status, emergence of resistance biomarkers, or assessment of new biomarkers). The aim of this pragmatic prospective multicenter study was to assess the feasibility and clinical utility of re-biopsy in advanced NSCLC in a real-world setting.

METHODS

The main inclusion criteria were advanced NSCLC with an indication for repeat biopsy identified by the patient's clinician. The primary outcome was the percentage of successful procedures. Secondary outcomes were the type of procedure, new biological status, tolerability of the procedure, and clinical utility (treatment modification).

RESULTS

From May 2012 to May 2013, 18 centers enrolled 100 patients (males: 44%; median age: 64.8 years; PS 0/1: 88%; adenocarcinoma: 89%; EGFR mutated: 50%; no initial biological profile: 16.4%). Re-biopsy was not possible in 19.5% of cases and provided no or too few tumor cells in 25.6% of cases. Repeat biopsy was useful for guiding treatment in 30.4% (25/82) of cases. Complications were infrequent (2 cases of moderate bleeding and 1 case of pneumothorax).

CONCLUSION

Re-biopsy of advanced NSCLC is feasible in the real-world setting, with acceptable adverse events. Guidelines are needed on the indications of re-biopsy, the choice of procedure, the sampling site, and laboratory analysis.

Two biomarker-directed randomized trials in European and Chinese patients with nonsmall-cell lung cancer: the BRCA1-RAP80 Expression Customization (BREC) studies

BACKGROUND

In a Spanish Lung Cancer Group (SLCG) phase II trial, the combination of BRCA1 and receptor-associated protein 80 (RAP80) expression was significantly associated with outcome in Caucasian patients with nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The SLCG therefore undertook an industry-independent collaborative randomized phase III trial comparing nonselected cisplatin-based chemotherapy with therapy customized according to BRCA1/RAP80 expression. An analogous randomized phase II trial was carried out in China under the auspices of the SLCG to evaluate the effect of BRCA1/RAP80 expression in Asian patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligibility criteria included stage IIIB-IV NSCLC and sufficient tumor specimen for molecular analysis. Randomization to the control or experimental arm was 1 : 1 in the SLCG trial and 1 : 3 in the Chinese trial. In both trials, patients in the control arm received docetaxel/cisplatin; in the experimental arm, patients with low RAP80 expression received gemcitabine/cisplatin, those with intermediate/high RAP80 expression and low/intermediate BRCA1 expression received docetaxel/cisplatin, and those with intermediate/high RAP80 expression and high BRCA1 expression received docetaxel alone. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Two hundred and seventy-nine patients in the SLCG trial and 124 in the Chinese trial were assessable for PFS. PFS in the control and experimental arms in the SLCG trial was 5.49 and 4.38 months, respectively [log rank P = 0.07; hazard ratio (HR) 1.28; P = 0.03]. In the Chinese trial, PFS was 4.74 and 3.78 months, respectively (log rank P = 0.82; HR 0.95; P = 0.82).

CONCLUSION

Accrual was prematurely closed on the SLCG trial due to the absence of clinical benefit in the experimental over the control arm. However, the BREC studies provide proof of concept that an international, nonindustry, biomarker-directed trial is feasible. Thanks to the groundwork laid by these studies, we expect that ongoing further research on alternative biomarkers to elucidate DNA repair mechanisms will help define novel therapeutic approaches.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT00617656/GECP-BREC and ChiCTR-TRC-12001860/BREC-CHINA.

[Ten-year evolution in non-small-cell lung cancer according to sex. Results of the KBP-2010-CPHG study by the College of General Hospital Respiratory Physicians]

INTRODUCTION

Comparison by sex and presenting features between 2000 and 2010 of the characteristics of new cases of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Observational KBP-2010-CPHG study similar to KBP-2000-CPHG. Both studies were promoted by the French College of General Hospital Respiratory Physicians (CPHG). KBP-2010-CPHG collected data for 6083 NSCLC diagnosed between January 1st and December 31st, 2010, and followed in the respiratory departments of 119 French general hospitals.

RESULTS

In 2010, 24.4 % of the patients were women (16 % in 2000, p<0.0001). Compared to men, women were more commonly non-smokers (34.2 vs 4.7 %) or lighter consumers (37.2 vs 43.7 pack per years) (p<0.0001). Their tumours (mostly adenocarcinoma: 64.6 vs 48.7 %, p<0.0001) were more frequently diagnosed at stage IV (62.4 vs 56.9 %, p=0.0008). EGFR mutation research was more frequently performed (48.5 vs 31.0 %, p<0.0001) and positive (20.6 vs 5.2 %, p<0.0001) in women than men. Their treatment more frequently included targeted therapy (13.4 vs 5.7 %, p<0.0001). Compared to 2000, the percentage of non-smokers increased in men (4.7 vs 2.5 %, p<0.0001) while remaining stable in women (36.1 vs 34.2 %, p=0.32). The percentage of adenocarcinomas increased, particularly in men (48.7 vs 31.5 %, p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The percentage of women with NSCLC has increased in 10years in France. In 2010, the main gender differences persist, but have decreased with the increasing proportion of non-smokers and adenocarcinomas in men. Various hypotheses to explain these changes are discussed.

Small bowel adenocarcinoma phenotyping, a clinicobiological prognostic study

BACKGROUND

Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare tumour with a poor prognosis. Molecular biology data on SBA carcinogenesis are lacking.

METHODS

Expression of HER2, β-catenin, p53 and mismatch repair (MMR) protein was assessed by immunohistochemistry. KRAS, V600E BRAF mutations and microsatellite instability were investigated.

RESULTS

We obtained samples from 63 SBA patients (tumour stages: I-II: 30%; III: 35%; IV: 32%; locally advanced: 3%). HER2 overexpression (3+) was observed in 2 out of 62 patients, overexpression of p53 in 26 out of 62, abnormal expression of β-catenin in 12 out of 61, KRAS mutation in 21 out of 49, BRAF V600E mutation in 1 out of 40 patients, MMR deficiency (dMMR) in 14 out of 61 and was consistent with Lynch syndrome in 9 out of 14 patients. All of the dMMR tumours were in the duodenum or jejunum and only one was stage IV. Median overall survival (OS) was 36.6 months (95% CI, 26.9-72.2). For all patients, in univariate analysis, stages I-II (P<0.001), WHO PS 0-1 (P=0.01) and dMMR phenotype (P=0.02) were significantly associated with longer OS. In multivariate analysis, disease stage (P=0.01) and WHO PS 0-1 (P=0.001) independently predicted longer OS. For stage IV patients, median OS was 20.5 months (95% CI: 14.6; 36.6 months). In multivariate analysis, WHO PS 0-1 (P=0.0001) and mutated KRAS status (P=0.02) independently predicted longer OS.

CONCLUSION

This large study suggests that molecular alterations in SBA are closer to those in colorectal cancer (CRC) than those in gastric cancer, with low levels of HER 2 overexpression and high frequencies of KRAS mutations. The seemingly higher frequency of dMMR than in CRC may be explained by the higher frequency of Lynch syndrome in SBA patients. A dMMR phenotype was significantly associated with a non-metastatic tumour (P=0.02). A trend for a good prognosis and a duodenum or jejunum primary site was associated with dMMR.

Study KBP-2010-CPHG: Characteristics and management of 968 new cases of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC)

e19078

Background: In recent years, many major advances have been made in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and in particular in adenocarcinoma, but not in SCLC. In 2010, the French College of General Hospital Respiratory Physicians (CPHG) performed a prospective multicentre epidemiological study (KBP-2010-CPHG) to describe the baseline characteristics and management of all new cases of primary lung cancer and to evaluate survival. The present abstract reports results in SCLC patients. Methods: 7,051 patients ≥18 years presenting with a new case of primary lung cancer, histologically or cytologically diagnosed between 1 January and 31 December 2010 and managed in the respiratory department of one of the 104 general hospitals participating in the study, were included. A standardised form was completed for each patient. A steering committee checked data collection exhaustiveness. SCLC data were analysed separately. Results: There were 968 SCLC patients: mean age, 65.6 years (+/-10.6); 23.2% female; 4.4% non-smokers (11 % in women), 35.8% ex-smokers, 59.8% current smokers; 63.4% with performance status 0 or 1; 59.9% having lost weight within the previous 3 months (19.8% of whom had lost >10 kg). Main tumour characteristics at diagnosis were: 71.2% stage IV, 24.7% stage IIIA or IIIB, 4.1% of stage <III. 15.2% of patients received chemo-radiotherapy and 73.4% chemotherapy (86.2% platinum-based). Carboplatin was more commonly used in patients >70 (59.1%) than <70 years of age (40.9 %). One-year mortality was 64.2%. Compared with NSCLC patients, patients with SCLC more frequently were active smokers (59.8% vs.47.6%), lost weight (59.9% vs. 52.4%), and presented with stage IV tumour at diagnosis (71.2% vs. 58.3%); first line therapy was more frequently platinum-based chemotherapy (86.2% vs. 61.2%) and less frequently curative surgery (1.6% vs. 19%), and mortality was higher (64.2% vs. 55.2%). Conclusions: In 2010, prognosis remains poor in SCLC. Compared with NSCLC, it was more frequently associated with active smoking and stage IV disease, and showed a lower rate of surgery.

Chemical characteristics and antimicrobial effects of some Eucalyptus kinos

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Eucalyptus kinos are tannin-rich, mostly red-coloured wood exudates. They have played an important role in the traditional medicines of Australian Aboriginal people and were also a valued source of antibacterial and astringent agents for early European settlers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nineteen different Eucalyptus kinos were collected and analysed for their total phenolics and total tannin content as well as their relative amounts of hydrolysable and condensed tannins. They were also classified in accordance with Maiden's traditional kino categories. Well plate diffusion assays using three Gram positive and two Gram negative bacteria and a yeast species were carried out to assess antimicrobial properties.

RESULTS

The investigated kino samples differ strongly in their total phenolics and overall tannin as well as their relative hydrolysable and condensed tannin contents. All but one could be assigned to one of the traditional Maiden kino classes. The samples, in particular those collected from Corymbia maculata and Eucalyptus ficifolia, demonstrated a strong antibacterial activity towards Gram positive bacteria but were inactive against the Gram negative strains and the yeast. No obvious correlation seems to exist between a particular Maiden class and antibacterial activity but there is a positive correlation between total phenolics/tannin content and antibacterial effect although two of the investigated kinos (Eucalyptus flocktoniae and Eucalyptus sargentii) deviated from this trend. The relative amounts of hydrolysable and condensed tannins in a kino sample do not seem to determine the antibacterial effect.

CONCLUSION

Eucalpytus kinos present an interesting class of natural products which should be investigated further, not only to contribute to the growing field of tannin chemistry but to also learn more about the individual role played by the various hydrolysable and condensed tannins that determine a kino's antibacterial activity and to contribute to a better understanding of the use of some of these kinos in traditional systems of medicine. In particular samples like Eucalyptus flocktoniae kino, which recorded a higher antibacterial activity than predicted based on total tannin content, warrant more detailed chemical and antimicrobial analyses.

Study KBP-2010-CPHG: Characteristics and management of 7,051 new cases of lung cancer managed in French general hospitals in 2010

1574

Background: An initial epidemiologic study was performed in 2000 by the French College of General Hospital Respiratory Physicians (Study KBP-2000-CPHG). Over the last 10 years, lung cancer management changed: new drugs such as targeted therapies appeared; new diagnostic techniques such as exploration for genetic mutations in the tumour have been developed; a new TNM classification has been drawn up. The aims of this study were to describe patient characteristics, first-line management, 1, 4 and 5-year survival rates and to compare the results with those of Study KBP-2000-CPHG. Methods: A prospective multi-centre study included all patients ≥18 years presenting with a new case of primary lung cancer, histologically or cytologically diagnosed between 1 January and 31 December 2010 and managed by one of the participating centers. A standardised form was completed for each patient. A steering committee checked the exhaustivity of data’s collection. Results: 7,610 patients from 119 general hospitals were included between 1 January and 31 December 2010. The main patient characteristics were: mean age 65.5 years (+/-11.3); 24.3% female; 10.9% non-smokers, 39.9% ex-smokers, 49.2% current smokers; 68.9% performance status 0 and 1; 9.1% of patients had lost >10 kg within the previous 3 months. The main tumour characteristics were: 13.7% small-cell lung cancer; 46.2% adenocarcinoma, 26.8% squamous-cell carcinoma; EGFR mutation, explored in 30.5% of cases, were found in 10.5% of cases; 16.4% stage IA to IIB, 13.4% stage IIIA, 10.2% stage IIIB and 60.0% stage IV. First-line treatments were: curative surgery, 16.6%; chemotherapy, 63.4%; radiotherapy alone, 17.8%; combined radio-chemotherapy, 8.8%; and supportive care, 11.1%. Targeted therapy was used in 6.6% of patients treated by chemotherapy. Conclusions: In 10 years, characteristics of lung cancer patients changed with an significantly increase of women, non-smokers, adenocarcinoma histology and stage IV at diagnosis.

Malnutrition is high and underestimated during chemotherapy in gastrointestinal cancer: an AGEO prospective cross-sectional multicenter study

Although malnutrition is known to be frequent in cancer patients, it has not been described in a selected population of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies under chemotherapy only. Physician judgment about malnutrition and risk factors for malnutrition were also evaluated. All consecutive in- and outpatients of 11 centers were prospectively enrolled in a cross-sectional 14-day period study and classified according to the French health recommendations [Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS)]. Among 313 patients enrolled in 11 centers (mean age = 63 yr; range = 21-93; 67% male) mainly with colorectal (58%), pancreatic (15%), gastric (11%), and hepatobiliary (10%) primary tumors, the prevalence of malnutrition was 52%. Moderate and severe malnutrition was present in 27% and 25% of cases, respectively. Physicians considered it in 36% and 6% of cases, respectively, thereby misclassifying 134 patients (43%). The agreement between the HAS definition and the physicians' judgment was very low (κ = 0.30). Most of the patients who were identified as severely malnourished received no nutritional support. Performance status and pancreatic and gastric cancers were independently associated with malnutrition. Malnutrition levels are high, around 50%, unequally distributed according to the primitive tumor. It is still underestimated by physicians. Weight loss remains a clinically relevant, simple, and reliable marker of malnutrition.