Recommendations for Post-Operative Radiotherapy after complete resection of Thymoma - a French DELPHI consensus initiative

BACKGROUND

Thymomas are rare intrathoracic malignancies that can relapse after surgery. Whether or not Post-Operative Radiotherapy (PORT) should be delivered after surgery remains a major issue. RADIORYTHMIC is an ongoing, multicenter, randomized phase 3 trial addressing this question in patients with completely R0 resected Masaoka-Koga stage IIb/III thymoma. Experts in the field met to develop recommendations for PORT.

METHODS

A scientific committee from the RYTHMIC network identified key issues regarding the modalities of PORT in completely resected thymoma. A DELPHI-method was used to question 24 national experts, with 115 questions regarding: 1/ Imaging techniques, 2/ Clinical Target Volume (CTV) and margins, 3/ Dose constraints to Organs At Risk, 4/ Dose and fractionation, 5/ Follow-up and records. Consensus was defined when opinions reached ≥ 80% agreement.

RESULTS

We established the following recommendations: pre-operative contrast-enhanced CT-scan is recommended (94% agreement); optimization of radiation delivery includes either a 4D-CT based planning (82% agreement), a breath-holding inspiration breath-hold-based planning, or daily control CT-imaging (81% agreement); imaging fusion based on cardiovascular structures of pre-operative and planning CT-scan is recommended (82% agreement); right coronary and left anterior descending coronary arteries should be delineated as cardiac substructures (88% agreement); rotational RCMI/VMAT is recommended (88% agreement); total dose is 50Gy (81% agreement) with 1.8-2Gy per fraction (94% agreement); cardiac evaluation, and follow-up for patients with history of cardiovascular disease is recommended (88% agreement) with EKG and evaluation of LVEF at 5 years and 10 years.

CONCLUSION

This is the first consensus for PORT in thymoma. Implementation will help to harmonize practices.

Radiotherapy in the management of lung oligometastases

In recent years, the development of both medical imaging and new systemic agents (targeted therapy and immunotherapy) have revolutionized the field of oncology, leading to a new entity: oligometastatic disease. Adding local treatment of oligometastases to systemic treatment could lead to prolonged survival with no significant impact on quality of life. Given the high prevalence of lung oligometastases and the new systemic agents coming with increased pulmonary toxicity, this article provides a comprehensive review of the current state-of-art for radiotherapy of lung oligometastases. After reviewing pretreatment workup, the authors define several radiotherapy regimen based on the localization and size of the oligometastases. A comment on the synergistic combination of medical treatment and radiotherapy is also made, projecting on future steps in this specific clinical setting.

Radiotherapy in the management of synchronous metastatic lung cancer

Metastatic lung cancer classically portends a poor prognosis. The management of metastatic lung cancer has dramatically changed with the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors, targeted therapy and due to a better understanding of the oligometastatic process. In metastatic lung cancers, radiation therapy which was only used with palliative intent for decades, represents today a promising way to treat primary and oligometastatic sites with a curative intent. Herein we present through a literature review the role of radiotherapy in the management of synchronous metastatic lung cancers.

Stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases: predictive factors of radionecrosis

PURPOSE

Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is a highly effective approach and represents the current standard of treatment for patients with limited number of brain metastasis (BM). SRT is generally well tolerated but can sometimes lead to radionecrosis (RN). The aim of this study was to identify predictive factors of radionecrosis related to SRT for brain metastasis.

METHODS

This retrospective observational cohort study included patients who underwent SRT in the Institut Sainte Catherine between January 1st, 2017 and December 31st, 2020 for the treatment of brain metastasis from any cancer. Individual data and particularly signs of radionecrosis (clinical, imaging, anatomopathological) were collected from electronic medical records. Radionecrosis was defined as the occurrence on MRI of contrast-enhancing necrotic lesions, surrounded by edema, occurring at least 6 months after SRT and localized within fields of irradiation.

RESULTS

123 patients were included; median age was 66 years. 17 patients (11.8%) developed radionecrosis after a median follow up of 418.5 days [63;1498]. Predictive factors of radionecrosis in multivariate analysis were age under 66 years with a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 56%. No other factor as the presence of comorbidities, the number of irradiated metastases, the PTV volume or the volume of irradiated healthy brain were predictive of radionecrosis.

CONCLUSION

Age at treatment initiation and tumor location seems to be correlated with radionecrosis in patients with brain metastasis treated with SRT. These elements could be useful to adapted radiation therapy.

Postoperative radiotherapy versus no postoperative radiotherapy in patients with completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer and proven mediastinal N2 involvement (Lung ART): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

In patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the use of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) has been controversial since 1998, because of one meta-analysis showing a deleterious effect on survival in patients with pN0 and pN1, but with an unclear effect in patients with pN2 NSCLC. Because many changes have occurred in the management of patients with NSCLC, the role of three-dimensional (3D) conformal PORT warrants further investigation in patients with stage IIIAN2 NSCLC. The aim of this study was to establish whether PORT should be part of their standard treatment.

METHODS

Lung ART is an open-label, randomised, phase 3, superiority trial comparing mediastinal PORT to no PORT in patients with NSCLC with complete resection, nodal exploration, and cytologically or histologically proven N2 involvement. Previous neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy was allowed. Patients aged 18 years or older, with an WHO performance status of 0-2, were recruited from 64 hospitals and cancer centres in five countries (France, UK, Germany, Switzerland, and Belgium). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the PORT or no PORT (control) groups via a web randomisation system, and minimisation factors were the institution, administration of chemotherapy, number of mediastinal lymph node stations involved, histology, and use of pre-treatment PET scan. Patients received PORT at a dose of 54 Gy in 27 or 30 daily fractions, on five consecutive days a week. Three dimensional conformal radiotherapy was mandatory, and intensity-modulated radiotherapy was permitted in centres with expertise. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival, analysed by intention to treat at 3 years; patients from the PORT group who did not receive radiotherapy and patients from the control group with no follow-up were excluded from the safety analyses. This trial is now closed. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00410683.

FINDINGS

Between Aug 7, 2007, and July 17, 2018, 501 patients, predominantly staged with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET (456 [91%]; 232 (92%) in the PORT group and 224 (90%) in the control group), were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive PORT (252 patients) or no PORT (249 patients). At the cutoff date of May 31, 2019, median follow-up was 4·8 years (IQR 2·9-7·0). 3-year disease-free survival was 47% (95% CI 40-54) with PORT versus 44% (37-51) without PORT, and the median disease-free survival was 30·5 months (95% CI 24-49) in the PORT group and 22·8 months (17-37) in the control group (hazard ratio 0·86; 95% CI 0·68-1·08; p=0·18). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were pneumonitis (13 [5%] of 241 patients in the PORT group vs one [<1%] of 246 in the control group), lymphopenia (nine [4%] vs 0), and fatigue (six [3%] vs one [<1%]). Late-grade 3-4 cardiopulmonary toxicity was reported in 26 patients (11%) in the PORT group versus 12 (5%) in the control group. Two patients died from pneumonitis, partly related to radiotherapy and infection, and one patient died due to chemotherapy toxicity (sepsis) that was deemed to be treatment-related, all of whom were in the PORT group.

INTERPRETATION

Lung ART evaluated 3D conformal PORT after complete resection in patients who predominantly had been staged using (18F-FDG PET-CT and received neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. 3-year disease-free survival was higher than expected in both groups, but PORT was not associated with an increased disease-free survival compared with no PORT. Conformal PORT cannot be recommended as the standard of care in patients with stage IIIAN2 NSCLC.

FUNDING

French National Cancer Institute, Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique from the French Health Ministry, Gustave Roussy, Cancer Research UK, Swiss State Secretary for Education, Research, and Innovation, Swiss Cancer Research Foundation, Swiss Cancer League.

Radiotherapy for primary lung cancer

Herein are presented the recommendations from the Société française de radiothérapie oncologique regarding indications and modalities of lung cancer radiotherapy. The recommendations for delineation of the target volumes and organs at risk are detailed.

Quality/risk management system in radiotherapy: Changes afoot

The French sanitary and regulatory context in which radiotherapy centres are comprised is evolving. Risk and quality management systems are currently adapting to these evolutions. The French nuclear safety agency (ASN) decision of July 1st 2008 on quality assurance obligations in radiotherapy has reached 10 years of age, and the French high authority of health (HAS) certification system 20 years now. Mandatory tools needed for the improvement of quality and safety in healthcare are now well known. From now on, the focus of healthcare policies is oriented towards evaluation of efficiency of these new organisations designed following ASN and HAS nationwide guidelines.

Innovation, value and reimbursement in radiation and complex surgical oncology: Time to rethink

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Complex surgery and radiotherapy are the central pillars of loco-regional oncology treatment. This paper describes the reimbursement schemes used in radiation and complex surgical oncology, reports on literature and policy reviews.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic review of the literature of the reimbursement models has been carried out separately for radiotherapy and complex cancer surgery based on PRISMA guidelines. Using searches of PubMed and grey literature, we identified articles from scientific journals and reports published since 2000 on provider payment or reimbursement systems currently used in radiation oncology and complex cancer surgery, also including policy models.

RESULTS

Most European health systems reimburse radiotherapy using a budget-based, fee-for-service or fraction-based system; while few reimburse services according to an episode-based model. Also, the reimbursement models for cancer surgery are mostly restricted to differences embedded in the DRG system and adjustments applied to the fees, based on the complexity of each surgical procedure. There is an enormous variability in reimbursement across countries, resulting in different incentives and different amounts paid for the same therapeutic strategy.

CONCLUSION

A reimbursement policy, based on the episode of care as the basic payment unit, is advocated for. Innovation should be tackled in a two-tier approach: one defining the common criteria for reimbursement of proven evidence-based interventions; another for financing emerging innovation with uncertain definitive value. Relevant clinical and economic data, also collected real-life, should support reimbursement systems that mirror the actual cost of evidence-based practice.

Safety of G-CSF with concurrent chemo-radiotherapy in limited-stage small cell lung cancer - Secondary analysis of the randomised phase 3 CONVERT trial

OBJECTIVES

The use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) during concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (cCTRT) for small cell lung cancer is not recommended by the American Society of Clinical Oncology due to safety concerns. This secondary analysis explored the safety and the role of prophylactic G-CSF (proG-CSF) in the delivery of cCTRT.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Secondary analysis of 487 patients treated as per protocol on the phase 3 CONVERT trial which randomized patients between once-daily RT or twice-daily.

RESULTS

180 of 487 eligible patients (37 %) received proG-CSF, 60 (33 %) as primary prophylaxis and 120 (67 %) as secondary prophylaxis following myelotoxic events. The regimen incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) was 22 %. Its incidence in the proG-CSF group reduced significantly when proG-CSF was administered (22 % vs 10 %; OR 0.4; 95 %CI 0.2-0.7; p = 0.002). The rate of blood transfusion was higher in the proG-CSF group (51 % vs 31 %; OR 2.4; 95 %CI 1.6-3.5; p < 0.001). The incidence of severe thrombocytopenia was also higher is this group (28 % vs 15 %; OR 2.2; 95 %CI 1.4-3.5; p = 0.001). But this was significantly higher in those on secondary vs primary prophylaxis (34 % vs 15 %; OR 2.9; 95 %CI 1.3-7.4 p = 0.009) No differences observed in RT-related toxicity, treatment-related mortality or any survival outcomes. The optimal dose intensity (85 % or higher) of cisplatin was achieved in more patients within the proG-CSF group (75 % vs 67 %; OR 1.5; 95 %CI 0.9-2.3; p = 0.056).

CONCLUSION

There was no evidence that G-CSF directly caused myelotoxicity, instead most patients started G-CSF due to higher myelotoxicity risk. G-CSF maintained the planned dose intensity and there was no detrimental effect on survival. G-CSF may be considered as a supportive measure in this setting.

Mass Spectrometry as a Highly Sensitive Method for Specific Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis in NSCLC: A Comparison Study

Simple Summary

We compared the UltraSEEK™ Lung Panel on the MassARRAY^® System (Agena Bioscience) with the FDA-approved Cobas^® EGFR Mutation Test v2 for the detection of EGFR mutations in liquid biopsies of NSCLC patients, accompanied with preanalytical sample assessment using the novel Liquid IQ^® Panel. For the detection of relevant predictive mutations using the UltraSEEK™ Lung Panel, an input of over 10 ng showed 100% concordance with Cobas^® EGFR Mutation Test v2 and detection of all tissue confirmed mutations. In case of lower ccfDNA input, the risk of missing clinically relevant mutations should be considered. The use of a preanalytical ccfDNA quality control assay such as the Liquid IQ^® Panel is recommended to confidently interpret results, avoiding bias induced by non-specific genomic DNA and low input of specific tumoral ccfDNA fragments.

Abstract

Plasma-based tumor mutational profiling is arising as a reliable approach to detect primary and therapy-induced resistance mutations required for accurate treatment decision making. Here, we compared the FDA-approved Cobas^® EGFR Mutation Test v2 with the UltraSEEK™ Lung Panel on the MassARRAY^® System on detection of EGFR mutations, accompanied with preanalytical sample assessment using the novel Liquid IQ^® Panel. 137 cancer patient-derived cell-free plasma samples were analyzed with the Cobas^® and UltraSEEK™ tests. Liquid IQ^® analysis was initially validated (n = 84) and used to determine ccfDNA input for all samples. Subsequently, Liquid IQ^® results were applied to harmonize ccfDNA input for the Cobas^® and UltraSEEK™ tests for 63 NSCLC patients. The overall concordance between the Cobas^® and UltraSEEK™ tests was 86%. The Cobas^® test detected more EGFR exon19 deletions and L858R mutations, while the UltraSEEK™ test detected more T790M mutations. A 100% concordance in both the clinical (n = 137) and harmonized (n = 63) cohorts was observed when >10 ng of ccfDNA was used as determined by the Liquid IQ^® Panel. The Cobas^® and UltraSEEK™ tests showed similar sensitivity in EGFR mutation detection, particularly when ccfDNA input was sufficient. It is recommended to preanalytically determine the ccfDNA concentration accurately to ensure sufficient input for reliable interpretation and treatment decision making.

Randomized Trial Comparing a Web-Mediated Follow-up With Routine Surveillance in Lung Cancer Patients

Background

The use of web-based monitoring for lung cancer patients is growing in interest because of promising recent results suggesting improvement in cancer and resource utilization outcomes. It remains an open question whether the overall survival (OS) in these patients could be improved by using a web-mediated follow-up rather than classical scheduled follow-up and imaging.

Methods

Advanced-stage lung cancer patients without evidence of disease progression after or during initial treatment were randomly assigned in a multicenter phase III trial to compare a web-mediated follow-up algorithm (experimental arm), based on weekly self-scored patient symptoms, with routine follow-up with CT scans scheduled every three to six months according to the disease stage (control arm). In the experimental arm, an alert email was automatically sent to the oncologist when self-scored symptoms matched predefined criteria. The primary outcome was OS.

Results

From June 2014 to January 2016, 133 patients were enrolled and 121 were retained in the intent-to-treat analysis; 12 deemed ineligible after random assignment were not subsequently followed. Most of the patients (95.1%) had stage III or IV disease. The median follow-up was nine months. The median OS was 19.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 12.5 to noncalculable) in the experimental and 12.0 months (95% CI = 8.6 to 16.4) in the control arm (one-sided P = .001) (hazard ratio = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.15 to 0.67, one-sided P = .002). The performance status at first detected relapse was 0 to 1 for 75.9% of the patients in the experimental arm and for 32.5% of those in the control arm (two-sided P < .001). Optimal treatment was initiated in 72.4% of the patients in the experimental arm and in 32.5% of those in the control arm (two-sided P < .001).

Conclusions

A web-mediated follow-up algorithm based on self-reported symptoms improved OS due to early relapse detection and better performance status at relapse.

[Radiotherapy for small cell lung carcinoma]

Radiotherapy for small cell lung carcinoma has known significant improvements over the past 10 years especially through routine use of PET-CT in the initial work-up and contouring before treatment. Prophylactic cranial irradiation remains a standard of care for locally advanced disease and is a subject of controversy for metastatic disease. A new indication for thoracic radiotherapy may soon arise for metastatic disease, still confirmation studies are ongoing.

[Quality and safety management for radiotherapy]

Quality and safety management have been implemented for many years in healthcare structures (hospitals treating cancer, private radiotherapy centres). Their structure and formalization have improved progressively over time. These recommendations aim at describing the link between quality and safety management through its organization scheme based on quality-safety policy, process approach, document management and quality measurement. Dedicated tools, such as experience feedback, a priori risk mapping, to-do-lists and check-lists are shown as examples and recommended as routine practice.

Overall survival in patients with lung cancer using a web-application-guided follow-up compared to standard modalities: Results of phase III randomized trial

LBA9006

Background: We developed a web-application for an early detection of symptomatic relapse, complications and early supportive care in high-risk lung cancer patients between visits. A dynamical analysis of the weekly self-reported symptoms automatically triggered physician visit. Methods: We performed a national multi-institutional phase 3 prospective randomized study to compare web-application follow-up (experimental arm) for which patient’s self-scored symptoms that were weekly sent (between planned visits) to the oncologist and a clinical routine assessment with a CT-scan (every 3-6 months or at investigator’s discretion - standard arm). High risk lung cancer patients without progression and with a 0-2 performance status (PS) after an initial treatment were included. Maintenance chemotherapy or TKI therapy were allowed. In the experimental arm, an email alert was sent to the oncologist when some predefined clinical criteria were fulfilled: an imaging was then quickly prescribed. Early supportive cares were provided if adequate. The primary endpoint was to detect an improvement of 12% in 9 months survival in favor of the experimental arm (α = 5%, β = 20%, unilateral test). The boundary for declaring superiority with respect to overall survival at the pre-planned interim analysis was a p-value of less than 0.006. The PS at relapse, the quality of life (QOL) and cost-effectiveness were also investigated. Results: 121 patients were included in the intent-to-test survival analysis (90% were stage III/IV, median age: 65 y): 60 (61) in the experimental (standard) arms with equivalent baseline characteristics. Median follow-up was 9 months. Median overall survival in months was 19 (11.8), p=0.0014 (n  =  121; HR  =  0.33; 95 % CI, 0.16-0.67) and the PS at the first relapse was 0-1 for 81.5% (35.3%) of the patients (p<0.001) in the experimental (standard) arm. Conclusions: This trial shows a significant survival improvement using Web-application-guided follow-up that allowed better PS at relapse, earlier supportive care and reduction of routine imaging. QOL and cost analysis results will be presented during the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT02361099.

[Patient information duties in radiation oncology]

Patient information duties are a basic task of radiation oncologists in their daily practice. This article is essentially a factsheet on legal obligations, the value of written informed consent and information documents that ought to be given to patient.

[FMEA applied to the radiotherapy patient care process]

PURPOSE

Failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA), is a risk analysis method used at the Radiotherapy Department of Institute Sainte-Catherine as part of a strategy seeking to continuously improve the quality and security of treatments.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The method comprises several steps: definition of main processes; for each of them, description for every step of prescription, treatment preparation, treatment application; identification of the possible risks, their consequences, their origins; research of existing safety elements which may avoid these risks; grading of risks to assign a criticality score resulting in a numerical organisation of the risks. Finally, the impact of proposed corrective actions was then estimated by a new grading round.

RESULTS

For each process studied, a detailed map of the risks was obtained, facilitating the identification of priority actions to be undertaken. For example, we obtain five steps in patient treatment planning with an unacceptable level of risk, 62 a level of moderate risk and 31 an acceptable level of risk.

CONCLUSION

The FMEA method, used in the industrial domain and applied here to health care, is an effective tool for the management of risks in patient care. However, the time and training requirements necessary to implement this method should not be underestimated.

Cisplatin-docetaxel induction plus concurrent 3-D conformal radiotherapy and weekly chemotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients: a phase II trial

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CHRT) is the standard of care for unresectable locally advanced stage III non-small cell lung cancer. However, the optimal combination remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of 2 induction chemotherapy cycles (days 1 and 22) with docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) followed by concurrent chemotherapy (weekly docetaxel-cisplatin, 20 mg/m(2)) and 3-D conformal radiotherapy for 6 weeks (66 Gy/5 fractions per week/2 Gy per fraction). The primary endpoint was the response rate. Secondary objectives were toxicity, time to progression, and overall survival. Forty-four patients were included and 40 were eligible. The mean age was 60.5 years (range 40.7-72.1), and 75% had stage IIIB disease. Six patients underwent complete R0 resection including 2 pathologic complete responses after a planned intermediate evaluation. Thirty-three patients completed CHRT. The objective response rate was 65% (95% CI 50.2-79.8). Grade 3-4 hematologic and digestive toxicities were observed mainly during the induction phase. Grade 3 esophagitis (5%) was experienced during CHRT. With a median follow-up of 38.7 months, the median progression-free survival was 28.3 months (95% CI 11.0-35.0) and the median survival rate was 31.4 months. Cisplatin-docetaxel induction followed by concurrent 3-D conformal radiotherapy and weekly chemotherapy is a feasible protocol associated with a promising response rate and acceptable toxicity.

Induction 3D-chemoradiation (CRT) yields a high rate of pathologic complete response in stage IIB(Pancoast)/III NSCLC operable patients (pts) without increasing perioperative mortality after (bi-)lobectomy: A review of 107 cases treated in a community- based center

7704

Background: Optimal preoperative treatment for stage IIB/III NSCLC remains a subject of controversy. According to the results of INT0139 trial (Albain KS et al in Proc ASCO 2005, abstr #7014), induction CRT appears to be superior to chemotherapy alone (CT) in terms of pathologic complete response (or microscopic residual foci, pCR), but increases postoperative (postop) mortality after pneumonectomy. Methods: Pts were selected through a multidisciplinary committee according to functional and resecability criteria. Induction treatment comprised 45 Gy/25 fractions/5 weeks. RT delivered to the primary tumor and pathologic hilar and/or mediastinal nodes (CTV) with an extra-margin of 1 to 1.5 cm (PTV). A 3D 5-field technique was used for all patients with 8–25 MV photons. Concurrent CT regimen was Cisplatinum 20 mg/m2 and Etoposide 50 mg/m2 (PE), d1–5, d29–33. Surgery was performed 4 to 6 weeks after CRT completion in deemed resectable pts. Inoperable pts were referred for a 20 Gy boost ± 1 extra-cycle of PE. Results: From 1996 to 2005, 107 NSCLC pts received CRT (stage IIB-Pancoast 18, IIIA 58 and IIIB 31). One hundred pts received the whole 45 Gy+PEx2; 72 pts had a thoracotomy (pneumonectomy 21, lobectomy 45, bi-lobectomy 5, exploratory only 1). During the 3-month postop time, 5 pts (6.9%) died, 4 after pneumonectomy (R 3, L 1, 19%), 1 after lobectomy (2.2%); 34 pts had 1–3 significant complication(s) (mainly, arrhythmia 10, pneumonia 8 (lethal 1), prolonged air leak 7, fistula 4, empyema 4 (lethal 2), pulmonary embolism 3 (lethal 2)).A pCR was observed in 39.5% of 71 resected pts; mediastinal nodes were sterilized in 60.9% of 46 cN2 pts. Analysis of survival and predictive factors is ongoing. Conclusions: Surgery is feasible after induction chemo-RT, particularly (bi-)lobectomy, in stage IIB/III NSCLC pts but pneumonectomy carries an inacceptable risk of postop death (particularly, right pneumonectomy). CRT yields an encouraging pCR rate of 39.5%.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Quality of life in long-term survivors of oropharynx carcinoma

PURPOSE

To collect data on the health-related quality of life (QOL) of long-term survivors and to determine to what extent QOL might be an appropriate end point in the comparison of treatment options in oropharyngeal carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

All patients treated between 1992 and 1998, in two French comprehensive cancer centers, by brachytherapy (BT) +/- external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or surgery plus RT, or exclusive EBRT for T1-T3 (International Union Against Cancer staging system) oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma, were included. QOL was measured once in disease-free patients at least 2 years after treatment initiation. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 questionnaire and the specific H&N35 module were self-administered by all participating patients. Sociodemographic data were collected using a questionnaire specifically designed for the study. The association between the QOL scores of the various treatment-, disease-, and patient-related variables was performed through bivariate analysis and then by multivariate analysis. The mean QOL scores of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire were compared with the mean scores in the general population.

RESULTS

Of the 159 eligible patients, 113 agreed to participate (97 men and 16 women, median age 61 years, range 41-83). The initial treatment was EBRT plus BT in 49 patients, surgery plus RT in 27, and EBRT alone in 37. The median follow-up time was 62 months (range 24-110). Compared with the general population, the three scores indicating the most impaired QOL were emotional and social functioning and fatigue. The clinical significance of global QOL impairment was borderline. The physical functioning, role functioning, and pain scores did not significantly differ from those of the general population. In multivariate analysis, the initial treatment had no significant influence on any dimension of QOL, except global QOL and emotional functioning. Surprisingly, surgery plus RT, as the initial treatment, favorably influenced the emotional functioning score and EBRT plus BT negatively influenced the global QOL score. None of these treatment modalities influenced any symptom scales. Patient selection was, at least partially, responsible for these paradoxical results.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study bring original and useful data about the QOL of long-term survivors of oropharynx carcinoma. In these patients, the QOL was significantly impaired, particularly in its psychosocial dimensions. The level of symptoms and functioning (except global QOL and emotional) was similar whatever the initial treatment. These results suggest the importance of coping processes. In a trial comparing treatment options from a long-term perspective, survival remains the most relevant end point, and a QOL evaluation should be a secondary end point. More prospective studies on QOL in head-and-neck cancer patients are needed to determine new strategies for rehabilitation management.

[Management of mucositis following radiotherapy for head and neck cancers]

Acute mucositis is common after radiotherapy for head and neck cancers. During the past 3 decades, there was a gradual evolution in the treatment modalities for locally advanced carcinomas (concomitant radio-chemotherapy, accelerated radiotherapy). These new strategies are accompanied by an increase in early mucosal reactions. At the present time, there is no widely accepted prophylaxis or effective treatment. Many traditional remedies or new agents seem ineffective (Sucralfate, Chlorhexidine, GM-CSF, Silver nitrate, Prostaglandin, anti-oxidants, Benzydamine hydrochloride), while others seem promising (Povidone-iodine, nonabsorbable antibiotic lozenges and antifungals, local GM-CSF, Glutamide, Low-energy laser, corticosteroïds). Radioprotectors are controversial and should be only used in experimental protocols and not in routine practice. However, some recommendations can be proposed: general prevention and global care before cancer therapy should be systematic (oral hygiene, dental and periodontal treatment, advice to avoid the use of tobacco and alcohol); frequent oral rinsing with a bland mouthwash (Povidone-iodine or others) should be used at the start of treatment because there are significant modifications of the oral microflora increased by a disturbed salivary flow; these mouthwashes could be associated with nonabsorbable antibiotic lozenges or antifungal topicals (bicarbonates, Amphotéricine B); Systematic percutaneous fluoroscopic gastrostomy should be decided before any aggressive treatments (concomitant radio-chemotherapy, accelerated radiotherapy); pain should be controlled; finally, the radiation technique should be optimized (mucosal-sparing block, conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy).

Efficacy of external fractionated radiation therapy in the treatment of meningiomas: a 20-year experience

BACKGROUND

This is a retrospective analysis of a series of meningiomas treated by radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 1978 to 1997, 45 patients with intracranial meningiomas were referred for external fractionated radiotherapy at Centre Alexis Vautrin. All patients were given 50-70Gy to the tumor bed (median: 56Gy), 1.8-2Gy per fraction.

RESULTS

Evaluation was performed in June 1999 using the Kaplan-Meyer actuarial method with a median follow-up of 30 months (range: 1-166), relapse-free survivals (RFSs) were 75% at 5 years and 67% at 8 years; overall survival (OS) was 74% at 5 and 8 years. For the 26 benign histologically documented lesions, RFSs were 95% at 5 years and 81% at 8 years; OS was 85% at 5 and 8 years. One major radiation-induced complication occurred in this series (decline of cognitive function). According to the indication of radiotherapy, we divided the series into four groups: postoperative irradiation after a first subtotal resection (11 patients), 5-year RFS was 90%; after first recurrence (+/-salvage surgery, 14 patients), 73%; after further recurrence (+/-salvage surgery, 11 patients), 67%; as exclusive treatment (nine patients), 80%. Atypical and malignant lesions (n=7) all relapsed before 24 months of follow-up, all patients but one died before 42 months. Age at the time of irradiation (> or =60 vs. <60 years) and radiotherapy dose (> or =60 vs. <60Gy) did not influence local control or OS. Atypical and malignant lesions (WHO grades II and III) meningiomas had a worse outcome than benign lesions (WHO grade I, P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

These results compare favorably with previously published data. External fractionated radiotherapy is well tolerated and effective. There is still a debate about the place of radiotherapy in the treatment of meningiomas: after subtotal resection, should radiotherapy be given postoperatively or at the time of progression? Should radiotherapy replace surgery when the risk of postoperative sequellae is high? Prospective randomized trials would be required to address these issues.