RNA and the RNA-binding protein FUS act in concert to prevent TDP-43 spatial segregation

FUS and TDP-43 are two self-adhesive aggregation-prone mRNA-binding proteins whose pathological mutations have been linked to neurodegeneration. While TDP-43 and FUS form reversible mRNA-rich compartments in the nucleus, pathological mutations promote their respective cytoplasmic aggregation in neurons with no apparent link between the two proteins except their intertwined function in mRNA processing. By combining analyses in cellular context and at high resolution in vitro, we unraveled that TDP-43 is specifically recruited in FUS assemblies to form TDP-43-rich subcompartments but without reciprocity. The presence of mRNA provides an additional scaffold to promote the mixing between TDP-43 and FUS. Accordingly, we also found that the pathological truncated form of TDP-43, TDP-25, which has an impaired RNA-binding ability, no longer mixes with FUS. Together, these results suggest that the binding of FUS along nascent mRNAs enables TDP-43, which is highly aggregation-prone, to mix with FUS phase to form mRNA-rich subcompartments. A functional link between FUS and TDP-43 may explain their common implication in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

FUS fibrillation occurs through a nucleation-based process below the critical concentration required for liquid-liquid phase separation

FUS is an RNA-binding protein involved in familiar forms of ALS and FTLD that also assembles into fibrillar cytoplasmic aggregates in some neurodegenerative diseases without genetic causes. The self-adhesive prion-like domain in FUS generates reversible condensates via the liquid-liquid phase separation process (LLPS) whose maturation can lead to the formation of insoluble fibrillar aggregates in vitro, consistent with the appearance of cytoplasmic inclusions in ageing neurons. Using a single-molecule imaging approach, we reveal that FUS can assemble into nanofibrils at concentrations in the nanomolar range. These results suggest that the formation of fibrillar aggregates of FUS could occur in the cytoplasm at low concentrations of FUS, below the critical ones required to trigger the liquid-like condensate formation. Such nanofibrils may serve as seeds for the formation of pathological inclusions. Interestingly, the fibrillation of FUS at low concentrations is inhibited by its binding to mRNA or after the phosphorylation of its prion-like domain, in agreement with previous models.

Methylglyoxal and Glyoxal as Potential Peripheral Markers for MCI Diagnosis and Their Effects on the Expression of Neurotrophic, Inflammatory and Neurodegenerative Factors in Neurons and in Neuronal Derived-Extracellular Vesicles

Methylglyoxal (MG) and glyoxal (GO) are suggested to be associated with the development of neurodegenerative pathologies. However, their peripheral levels in relation to cognitive decline and their effects on key factors in neuronal cells are poorly investigated. The aim of this study was to determine their serum levels in MCI (mild cognitive impairment) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients, to analyze their effects on the neurotrophic and inflammatory factors, on neurodegenerative markers in neuronal cells and in neuronal derived-extracellular vesicles (nEVs). Our results show that MG and GO levels in serum, determined by HPLC, were higher in MCI. ROC (receiver-operating characteristic curves) analysis showed that the levels of MG in serum have higher sensitivity to differentiate MCI from controls but not from AD. Meanwhile, serum GO levels differentiate MCI from control and AD groups. Cells and nEVs levels of BDNF, PRGN, NSE, APP, MMP-9, ANGPTL-4, LCN2, PTX2, S100B, RAGE, Aβ peptide, pTau T181 and alpha-synuclein were quantified by luminex assay. Treatment of neuronal cells with MG or GO reduced the cellular levels of NSE, PRGN, APP, MMP-9 and ANGPTL-4 and the nEVs levels of BDNF, PRGN and LCN2. Our findings suggest that targeting MG and GO may be a promising therapeutic strategy to prevent or delay the progression of AD.