Agreement between invasive and noninvasive measurement of tear film breakup time

The agreement between fluorescein breakup time (FBUT) estimates and noninvasive breakup time (NIBUT) estimates automatically acquired using two videokeratoscopes was assessed. Small-cone (E300, Medmont) and large-bowl (K5M, OCULUS) Placido-ring-based videokeratoscopes were utilized for automated NIBUT estimation and fluorescein strip method was used for FBUT estimation. 33 subjects completed the study. Clear instructions were given regarding the blink before measurements. Bland-Altman analysis was used to test the agreement between tear film breakup time estimates and repeated measure analysis of variance was used to test the differences between measurement types. In comparison to FBUT, E300 NIBUT estimate was shorter (- 0.6 ± 2.6 s), whereas K5M NIBUT estimate was longer (3.3 ± 2.4 s). Limits of agreement for FBUT vs. E300 was 29.8 s, for FBUT vs. K5M 26.4 s, and 31.4 s for E300 vs. K5M. There were significant differences between tear film breakup times (F = 3.59, df = 2, P = 0.032). E300 and K5M NIBUT measurements have poor agreement with FBUT, even when blinking is precisely clarified. Agreement was better for shorted break up times than that for longer ones but in general NIBUT measurements are not interchangeable.

Characterization of the external limbus on corneoscleral topography with ultrawide-field optical coherence tomography

PURPOSE

To present a new method for 3-dimensional external limbal demarcation on corneoscleral topography derived from optical coherence tomography (OCT). Limbal shape is investigated and compared to other landmarks.

METHODS

Images from the anterior segment were obtained with a ultrawide-field (20 mm) OCT. An automated algorithm was developed to demarcate the topographic limbus based on the transition from corneal to scleral curvature. The internal limbus was manually identified as the scleral spur on the OCT images. The external topographic limbus was fit with a circle on a plane. Ellipticity and ovality were defined by the lateral limbal deviation from the best-fit circle. Toricity was defined by the axial deviation from the best-fit plane. Repeatability was assessed by the within-subject standard deviation from two repeated measurements. For comparison, the white-to-white (WTW) diameter was obtained from Pentacam HR.

RESULTS

18 eyes from 11 subjects were analyzed. The topographic limbal diameter was 12.16 ± 0.68 mm (mean ± standard deviation) horizontally and 11.18 ± 0.65 mm vertically. The repeatability for the topographic limbal diameter was 0.054 mm. The internal and WTW horizontal limbal diameters were significantly smaller (linear mixed-effects model (GLMM), p <.017). The vertical internal limbal diameter was significantly larger (GLMM p <.05). The topographic limbus had significant ellipticity (0.25 ± 0.13 mm, wider horizontally, repeatability of 0.07 mm) and toricity (0.15 ± 0.08 mm, flatter horizontally, repeatability of 0.10 mm). Low coefficients of determination were found for the topographical limbus with the internal limbus (R2=0.021 and R2=0.039, for horizontal and vertical diameters respectively) and with the WTW (R2=0.146 for the horizontal diameter).

CONCLUSION

The proposed method to demarcate the 3D external topographical limbus is repeatable. The topographic limbal shape and size cannot be accurately derived from WTW nor internal limbus measures. This new technology may improve the process of scleral lens fitting.

Measuring corneal astigmatism using OCT in keratoconus

PURPOSE

To measure net corneal astigmatism using optical coherence tomography (OCT) (Avanti) in individuals with keratoconus and compare the repeatability and accuracy with those obtained using Scheimpflug imaging (Pentacam HR).

SETTING

Casey Eye Institute, Portland, Oregon.

DESIGN

Prospective cross-sectional observational study.

METHODS

Net corneal astigmatism was calculated in keratoconic and normal eyes using OCT and Scheimpflug imaging with 4 settings-pupil or vertex centration settings with a 3 or 4 mm circular analytical zone. Corneal elevation maps were obtained from OCT images and fitted with the Zernike polynomials to obtain net corneal astigmatism. Manifest refraction astigmatism was used to evaluate the accuracy of net corneal astigmatism measurements. The coefficient of repeatability from 2 repeated measures was calculated.

RESULTS

46 eyes with manifest or subclinical keratoconus and 52 normal control eyes were analyzed. For OCT measurements in keratoconus, better accuracy was achieved with pupil centration and 3 mm analytical zone; however, better repeatability was achieved with vertex centration and 4 mm analytical zone (coefficient of repeatability = 0.53 diopters, the Fligner-Killeen test with Bonferroni adjustment P &lt; .0017). Agreement with manifest refraction was significantly better with OCT compared with that using Pentacam HR (generalized mixed-effect model with Bonferroni adjustment P &lt; .00625). No statistically significant difference was found between instruments or settings in control eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

OCT was able to measure net corneal astigmatism with better accuracy and precision in keratoconic eyes than the Pentacam HR. Measurements may be more accurate using pupil centration and a smaller analytical zone in patients with keratoconus.

Accuracy of OCT-derived net corneal astigmatism measurement

PURPOSE

To assess the repeatability and accuracy of corneal astigmatism measurement with a spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) system (Avanti, Optovue) and compare them with Scheimpflug imaging (Pentacam HR, Oculus) and swept-source optical biometry (IOLMaster 700, Carl Zeiss Meditec AG).

SETTING

Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.

DESIGN

Prospective cross-sectional observational study.

METHODS

60 pseudophakic eyes with monofocal nontoric intraocular lens that previously had refractive surgery were analyzed. To assess accuracy, simulated keratometry (SimK) and net corneal astigmatism, obtained from each device, were compared with subjective manifest refraction astigmatism. Repeatability for corneal astigmatism was assessed for OCT and Pentacam HR by the coefficient of repeatability from 3 repeated measures.

RESULTS

Compared with manifest refraction, SimK readings produced with-the-rule astigmatic bias that was reduced for net astigmatism for the 3 devices. Except for OCT net astigmatism, all instruments significantly overestimated the magnitude of the astigmatism (linear mixed-effects model [LMM], P < .05). OCT net astigmatism showed the highest accuracy for manifest astigmatism prediction with the smaller 95% confidence ellipse for the mean difference vector. OCT net mean absolute difference was 0.57 diopters (D), significantly smaller than that of the other modalities (LMM, P < .05). Net corneal astigmatism measured with OCT showed the best repeatability (coefficient of repeatability = 0.29 D).

CONCLUSIONS

OCT has the capability to measure net corneal astigmatism with higher precision and accuracy than Pentacam HR Scheimpflug imaging and IOLMaster 700 swept-source optical biometry in postrefractive subjects.

A Novel Automated Approach for Infrared-Based Assessment of Meibomian Gland Morphology

Purpose

We present and validate a new methodology for analyzing, in an automated and objective fashion, infrared images of the meibomian glands (MG).

Methods

The developed algorithm consists of three main steps: selection of the region of interest, detection of MG, and analysis of MG morphometric parameters and dropout area (DOA). Additionally, a new approach to quantify the irregularity of MG is introduced. We recruited 149 adults from a general population. Infrared meibography, using Keratograph 5M, was performed. Images were assessed and graded subjectively (Meiboscore) by two experienced clinicians and objectively with the proposed automated method.

Results

The correlation of subjective DOA assessment between the two clinicians was poor and the average percentage of DOA estimated objectively for each Meiboscore group did not lie within their limits. The objective assessment showed lower variability of meibography grading than that obtained subjectively. Additionally, a new grading scale of MG DOA that reduces intraclass variation is proposed. Reported values of MG length and width were inversely proportional to the DOA. Gland irregularity was objectively quantified.

Conclusions

The proposed automatic and objective method provides accurate estimates of the DOA as well as additional morphologic parameters that could add valuable information in MG dysfunction understanding and diagnosis.

Translational Relevance

This approach highlights the shortcomings of currently used subjective methods, and provides the clinicians with an objective, quantitative and less variable alternative for assessing MG in a noninvasive and automated fashion. It provides a viable alternative to more time-consuming subjective methods.

Unified approach to tear film surface analysis with high-speed videokeratoscopy

Placido disk videokeratoscopy, when used in a dynamic acquisition mode, can be utilized for noninvasive assessment of tear film quality. The different commercially available videokeratoscopes that incorporate an automatic option to evaluate tear film do not provide consistent measurements due to differences in their designs as well as differences in the algorithms used to analyze the images. Here, a standardized algorithm that can be applied to different instruments is developed. Results show that, by applying the proposed methodology in two different videokeratoscopes, the agreement among the estimated tear film parameters considerably improves. This represents a step forward in the normalization of tear film assessment.