Dal Bianco M, Breda G, Artibani W, Bassi P, Ricciardi G, Marcon M, De Faveri D, Pagano F. Echography in vena cava invasion from renal tumors.
Eur Urol 1985;
11:95-9. [PMID:
3891356 DOI:
10.1159/000472464]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
The last 4 cases of our case series of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with caval or cavo-atrial invasion were studied by ultrasonography (US), computerized tomography (CT scan), arteriography (AG) and venocavography (VC) (inferior and/or superior). A comparison is made with these different methods, with particular emphasis on (US). The authors' conclusions are that ultrasound may replace anterograde inferior cavography in the evaluation of thrombotic extension and, in addition, it seems to be capable of eliminating the false-positives or -negatives of this method. AG and VC are no longer necessary to determine the cavo-atrial extension of a tumor thrombus from RCC when US and CT scan are available and are correctly integrated.
Collapse