1
|
Snyder MP, Gingeras TR, Moore JE, Weng Z, Gerstein MB, Ren B, Hardison RC, Stamatoyannopoulos JA, Graveley BR, Feingold EA, Pazin MJ, Pagan M, Gilchrist DA, Hitz BC, Cherry JM, Bernstein BE, Mendenhall EM, Zerbino DR, Frankish A, Flicek P, Myers RM. Perspectives on ENCODE. Nature 2020; 583:693-698. [PMID: 32728248 PMCID: PMC7410827 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2449-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2019] [Accepted: 05/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
The Encylopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) Project launched in 2003 with the long-term goal of developing a comprehensive map of functional elements in the human genome. These included genes, biochemical regions associated with gene regulation (for example, transcription factor binding sites, open chromatin, and histone marks) and transcript isoforms. The marks serve as sites for candidate cis-regulatory elements (cCREs) that may serve functional roles in regulating gene expression1. The project has been extended to model organisms, particularly the mouse. In the third phase of ENCODE, nearly a million and more than 300,000 cCRE annotations have been generated for human and mouse, respectively, and these have provided a valuable resource for the scientific community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael P Snyder
- Department of Genetics, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
- Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Thomas R Gingeras
- Functional Genomics, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA
| | - Jill E Moore
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Program in Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Zhiping Weng
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Program in Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology, Worcester, MA, USA
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Clinical Translational Research Center, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, The School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
- Bioinformatics Program, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Bing Ren
- Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Center for Epigenomics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Ross C Hardison
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| | - John A Stamatoyannopoulos
- Altius Institute for Biomedical Sciences, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Brenton R Graveley
- Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences, Institute for Systems Genomics, UConn Health, Farmington, CT, USA
| | - Elise A Feingold
- National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Michael J Pazin
- National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Michael Pagan
- National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Daniel A Gilchrist
- National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Benjamin C Hitz
- Department of Genetics, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - J Michael Cherry
- Department of Genetics, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Bradley E Bernstein
- Broad Institute and Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Eric M Mendenhall
- Biological Sciences, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL, USA
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL, USA
| | - Daniel R Zerbino
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Adam Frankish
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Paul Flicek
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Richard M Myers
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lavender CA, Cannady KR, Hoffman JA, Trotter KW, Gilchrist DA, Bennett BD, Burkholder AB, Burd CJ, Fargo DC, Archer TK. Downstream Antisense Transcription Predicts Genomic Features That Define the Specific Chromatin Environment at Mammalian Promoters. PLoS Genet 2016; 12:e1006224. [PMID: 27487356 PMCID: PMC4972320 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2016] [Accepted: 07/06/2016] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Antisense transcription is a prevalent feature at mammalian promoters. Previous studies have primarily focused on antisense transcription initiating upstream of genes. Here, we characterize promoter-proximal antisense transcription downstream of gene transcription starts sites in human breast cancer cells, investigating the genomic context of downstream antisense transcription. We find extensive correlations between antisense transcription and features associated with the chromatin environment at gene promoters. Antisense transcription downstream of promoters is widespread, with antisense transcription initiation observed within 2 kb of 28% of gene transcription start sites. Antisense transcription initiates between nucleosomes regularly positioned downstream of these promoters. The nucleosomes between gene and downstream antisense transcription start sites carry histone modifications associated with active promoters, such as H3K4me3 and H3K27ac. This region is bound by chromatin remodeling and histone modifying complexes including SWI/SNF subunits and HDACs, suggesting that antisense transcription or resulting RNA transcripts contribute to the creation and maintenance of a promoter-associated chromatin environment. Downstream antisense transcription overlays additional regulatory features, such as transcription factor binding, DNA accessibility, and the downstream edge of promoter-associated CpG islands. These features suggest an important role for antisense transcription in the regulation of gene expression and the maintenance of a promoter-associated chromatin environment. Gene transcription is regulated by the coordinated interaction of genetic, epigenetic and trans-acting factors. The chromatin environment at gene promoters, including positioned nucleosomes that may display functional histone modifications, is a key regulator of gene expression, contributing to transcriptional activation and repression. In addition to sense-strand transcription of gene sequences, antisense transcription is prevalent at gene promoters. Often resulting in a short-lived non-coding RNA transcript, the function of antisense transcription is poorly understood. Using next-generation sequencing techniques, we characterized transcription in human breast cancer cells and found extensive correlations between antisense transcription and the chromatin environment at promoters. We found that downstream antisense transcription initiates from between regularly positioned nucleosomes and that those nucleosomes between sense and downstream antisense transcription start sites display histone modifications associated with active gene promoters. Chromatin remodelers and other protein complexes responsible for creation and maintenance of the promoter chromatin environment associate with this same region, suggesting an important role of antisense transcription in the regulation of gene expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher A Lavender
- Epigenetics and Stem Cell Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America.,Integrative Bioinformatics, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Kimberly R Cannady
- Epigenetics and Stem Cell Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Jackson A Hoffman
- Epigenetics and Stem Cell Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Kevin W Trotter
- Epigenetics and Stem Cell Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Daniel A Gilchrist
- Epigenetics and Stem Cell Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Brian D Bennett
- Integrative Bioinformatics, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Adam B Burkholder
- Integrative Bioinformatics, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Craig J Burd
- Department of Molecular Genetics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.,Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | - David C Fargo
- Integrative Bioinformatics, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Trevor K Archer
- Epigenetics and Stem Cell Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shimbo T, Lavender C, Grimm SA, Doi MI, Henriques T, Cannady KR, Murphy KJ, Gilchrist DA, Burkholder A, Hayes JJ, Adelman K, Archer TK, Zaret KS, Wade PA. Abstract 2862: MBD3 regulates chromatin accessibility at active promoters. Cancer Res 2015. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2015-2862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Chromatin structure is tightly regulated in cells and its dysregulation is associated with diseases such as cancer. The Mi-2/NuRD (Nucleosome Remodeling Deacetylase) complex is postulated to organize chromatin structure using its nucleosome remodeling and histone deacetylase activities. MBD3 is an integral component of NuRD, which potentially targets the complex to the specific sites of the genome. Recently, we have demonstrated that MBD3/NuRD targets regulatory elements of active genes, a finding diametrically opposed to historical models depicting NuRD as a co-repressor localized to transcriptionally non-permissive chromatin. Moreover, MBD3 co-localized with RNA polymerase II (pol II) at loci where promoter-enhancer loops are formed. Although our previous findings shed light on the role of NuRD in the regulation of active genes, the detailed mechanism of how NuRD is involved in transcriptional regulation is yet not fully understood. To investigate this question, we have developed a next generation, tagmentation based chromatin immunoprecipitation method followed by massively parallel sequencing (ChIP-nexo), which substantially increased the resolution of the MBD3/NuRD mapping. ChIP-nexo defined MBD3/NuRD localization at high resolution, showing accumulation of MBD3 at active promoters with a dip at transcription start site, suggesting an active role of NuRD in modulation of the cell-type specific transcriptional network. To interrogate the detailed functions of NuRD at active promoters, we conducted MNase-seq using conditions which measures both nucleosome positioning and sensitivity, in MBD3 depleted cells. Depletion of MBD3 changed the accessibility of nucleosomes at promoters, while maintaining overall nucleosome positioning. These data indicate an active regulatory function of NuRD in fine tuning the transcriptional network by modulating transcription rates of pol II. We propose that NuRD may be involved in establishing cell type specific gene expression patterns in diverse cell types by organizing promoter nucleoprotein architecture.
Citation Format: Takashi Shimbo, Christopher Lavender, Sara A. Grimm, Makiko I. Doi, Telmo Henriques, Kimberly R. Cannady, Kevin J. Murphy, Daniel A. Gilchrist, Adam Burkholder, Jeffrey J. Hayes, Karen Adelman, Trevor K. Archer, Kenneth S. Zaret, Paul A. Wade. MBD3 regulates chromatin accessibility at active promoters. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 2862. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-2862
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Makiko I. Doi
- 2Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania, PA
| | | | | | - Kevin J. Murphy
- 3Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Rochester, NY
| | | | | | - Jeffrey J. Hayes
- 3Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Rochester, NY
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Scruggs BS, Gilchrist DA, Nechaev S, Muse GW, Burkholder A, Fargo DC, Adelman K. Bidirectional Transcription Arises from Two Distinct Hubs of Transcription Factor Binding and Active Chromatin. Mol Cell 2015; 58:1101-12. [PMID: 26028540 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 149] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2014] [Revised: 01/29/2015] [Accepted: 04/01/2015] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Anti-sense transcription originating upstream of mammalian protein-coding genes is a well-documented phenomenon, but remarkably little is known about the regulation or function of anti-sense promoters and the non-coding RNAs they generate. Here we define at nucleotide resolution the divergent transcription start sites (TSSs) near mouse mRNA genes. We find that coupled sense and anti-sense TSSs precisely define the boundaries of a nucleosome-depleted region (NDR) that is highly enriched in transcription factor (TF) motifs. Notably, as the distance between sense and anti-sense TSSs increases, so does the size of the NDR, the level of signal-dependent TF binding, and gene activation. We further discover a group of anti-sense TSSs in macrophages with an enhancer-like chromatin signature. Interestingly, this signature identifies divergent promoters that are activated during immune challenge. We propose that anti-sense promoters serve as platforms for TF binding and establishment of active chromatin to further regulate or enhance sense-strand mRNA expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin S Scruggs
- Epigenetics and Stem Cell Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
| | - Daniel A Gilchrist
- Epigenetics and Stem Cell Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
| | - Sergei Nechaev
- Epigenetics and Stem Cell Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
| | - Ginger W Muse
- Epigenetics and Stem Cell Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
| | - Adam Burkholder
- Center for Integrative Bioinformatics, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
| | - David C Fargo
- Center for Integrative Bioinformatics, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
| | - Karen Adelman
- Epigenetics and Stem Cell Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schröder S, Herker E, Itzen F, He D, Thomas S, Gilchrist DA, Kaehlcke K, Cho S, Pollard KS, Capra JA, Schnölzer M, Cole PA, Geyer M, Bruneau BG, Adelman K, Ott M. Acetylation of RNA polymerase II regulates growth-factor-induced gene transcription in mammalian cells. Mol Cell 2014; 52:314-24. [PMID: 24207025 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2013] [Revised: 08/26/2013] [Accepted: 09/27/2013] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Lysine acetylation regulates transcription by targeting histones and nonhistone proteins. Here we report that the central regulator of transcription, RNA polymerase II, is subject to acetylation in mammalian cells. Acetylation occurs at eight lysines within the C-terminal domain (CTD) of the largest polymerase subunit and is mediated by p300/KAT3B. CTD acetylation is specifically enriched downstream of the transcription start sites of polymerase-occupied genes genome-wide, indicating a role in early stages of transcription initiation or elongation. Mutation of lysines or p300 inhibitor treatment causes the loss of epidermal growth-factor-induced expression of c-Fos and Egr2, immediate-early genes with promoter-proximally paused polymerases, but does not affect expression or polymerase occupancy at housekeeping genes. Our studies identify acetylation as a new modification of the mammalian RNA polymerase II required for the induction of growth factor response genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Schröder
- Gladstone Institutes, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Affiliation(s)
- George Fromm
- Laboratory of Molecular Carcinogenesis, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Core LJ, Waterfall JJ, Gilchrist DA, Fargo DC, Kwak H, Adelman K, Lis JT. Defining the status of RNA polymerase at promoters. Cell Rep 2012; 2:1025-35. [PMID: 23062713 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.08.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 183] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2012] [Revised: 08/24/2012] [Accepted: 08/30/2012] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent genome-wide studies in metazoans have shown that RNA polymerase II (Pol II) accumulates to high densities on many promoters at a rate-limited step in transcription. However, the status of this Pol II remains an area of debate. Here, we compare quantitative outputs of a global run-on sequencing assay and chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing assays and demonstrate that the majority of the Pol II on Drosophila promoters is transcriptionally engaged; very little exists in a preinitiation or arrested complex. These promoter-proximal polymerases are inhibited from further elongation by detergent-sensitive factors, and knockdown of negative elongation factor, NELF, reduces their levels. These results not only solidify the notion that pausing occurs at most promoters, but demonstrate that it is the major rate-limiting step in early transcription at these promoters. Finally, the divergent elongation complexes seen at mammalian promoters are far less prevalent in Drosophila, and this specificity in orientation correlates with directional core promoter elements, which are abundant in Drosophila.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leighton J Core
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gilchrist DA, Fromm G, dos Santos G, Pham LN, McDaniel IE, Burkholder A, Fargo DC, Adelman K. Regulating the regulators: the pervasive effects of Pol II pausing on stimulus-responsive gene networks. Genes Dev 2012; 26:933-44. [PMID: 22549956 DOI: 10.1101/gad.187781.112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The expression of many metazoan genes is regulated through controlled release of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) that has paused during early transcription elongation. Pausing is highly enriched at genes in stimulus-responsive pathways, where it has been proposed to poise downstream targets for rapid gene activation. However, whether this represents the major function of pausing in these pathways remains to be determined. To address this question, we analyzed pausing within several stimulus-responsive networks in Drosophila and discovered that paused Pol II is much more prevalent at genes encoding components and regulators of signal transduction cascades than at inducible downstream targets. Within immune-responsive pathways, we found that pausing maintains basal expression of critical network hubs, including the key NF-κB transcription factor that triggers gene activation. Accordingly, loss of pausing through knockdown of the pause-inducing factor NELF leads to broadly attenuated immune gene activation. Investigation of murine embryonic stem cells revealed that pausing is similarly widespread at genes encoding signaling components that regulate self-renewal, particularly within the MAPK/ERK pathway. We conclude that the role of pausing goes well beyond poising-inducible genes for activation and propose that the primary function of paused Pol II is to establish basal activity of signal-responsive networks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel A Gilchrist
- Laboratory of Molecular Carcinogenesis, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gilchrist DA, Adelman K. Coupling polymerase pausing and chromatin landscapes for precise regulation of transcription. Biochim Biophys Acta 2012; 1819:700-6. [PMID: 22406341 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2012.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2011] [Revised: 02/17/2012] [Accepted: 02/23/2012] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Altering gene expression in response to stimuli is a pivotal mechanism through which organisms execute developmental programs and respond to changes in their environment. Packaging of promoter DNA into chromatin can greatly impact the ability of RNA polymerase II to access and transcribe a gene. Promoter chromatin environments thus play a central role in establishing transcriptional output appropriate for specific environmental conditions or developmental states. Recent genomic studies have illuminated general principles of chromatin organization and deepened our understanding of how promoter sequence and nucleosome architecture may impact gene expression. Concurrently, pausing of polymerase during early elongation has been recognized as an important event influencing transcription of genes within stimulus-responsive networks. Promoters regulated by pausing are now recognized to possess a distinct chromatin architecture that may facilitate the plasticity of gene expression in response to signaling events. Here we review advances in understanding chromatin and pausing, and explore how coupling Pol II pausing to distinct promoter architectures may help organisms achieve flexible yet precise transcriptional control. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Chromatin in time and space.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel A Gilchrist
- Laboratory of Molecular Carcinogenesis, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gilchrist DA, Dos Santos G, Fargo DC, Xie B, Gao Y, Li L, Adelman K. Pausing of RNA polymerase II disrupts DNA-specified nucleosome organization to enable precise gene regulation. Cell 2010; 143:540-51. [PMID: 21074046 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 319] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2010] [Revised: 08/18/2010] [Accepted: 09/27/2010] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Metazoan transcription is controlled through either coordinated recruitment of transcription machinery to the gene promoter or regulated pausing of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) in early elongation. We report that a striking difference between genes that use these distinct regulatory strategies lies in the "default" chromatin architecture specified by their DNA sequences. Pol II pausing is prominent at highly regulated genes whose sequences inherently disfavor nucleosome formation within the gene but favor occlusion of the promoter by nucleosomes. In contrast, housekeeping genes that lack pronounced Pol II pausing show higher nucleosome occupancy downstream, but their promoters are deprived of nucleosomes regardless of polymerase binding. Our results indicate that a key role of paused Pol II is to compete with nucleosomes for occupancy of highly regulated promoters, thereby preventing the formation of repressive chromatin architecture to facilitate further or future gene activation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel A Gilchrist
- Laboratory of Molecular Carcinogenesis, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Mutations in the zebrafish gene moonshine, encoding the ortholog of TIF1 gamma, cause profound anemia and embryonic lethality. In a recent issue of Cell, Bai et al. provide evidence that these defects arise from inefficient transcription elongation, implicating elongation as an important point of regulation during cell differentiation and development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel A Gilchrist
- Laboratory of Molecular Carcinogenesis, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kennedy M, Nechaev S, Gilchrist DA, Muse GW, Chinenov Y, Adelman K, Rogatsky I. Immediate mediators of the inflammatory response are poised for rapid gene activation through RNA polymerase stalling. Cytokine 2009. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cyto.2009.07.097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
13
|
Gilchrist DA, Fargo DC, Adelman K. Using ChIP-chip and ChIP-seq to study the regulation of gene expression: genome-wide localization studies reveal widespread regulation of transcription elongation. Methods 2009; 48:398-408. [PMID: 19275938 DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2009.02.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2008] [Revised: 02/25/2009] [Accepted: 02/27/2009] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcription is a sophisticated multi-step process in which RNA polymerase II (Pol II) transcribes a DNA template into RNA in concert with a broad array of transcription initiation, elongation, capping, termination, and histone modifying factors. Recent global analyses of Pol II distribution have indicated that many genes are regulated during the elongation phase, shedding light on a previously underappreciated mechanism for controlling gene expression. Understanding how various factors regulate transcription elongation in living cells has been greatly aided by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) studies, which can provide spatial and temporal resolution of protein-DNA binding events. The coupling of ChIP with DNA microarray and high-throughput sequencing technologies (ChIP-chip and ChIP-seq) has significantly increased the scope of ChIP studies and genome-wide maps of Pol II or elongation factor binding sites can now be readily produced. However, while ChIP-chip/ChIP-seq data allow for high-resolution localization of protein-DNA binding sites, they are not sufficient to dissect protein function. Here we describe techniques for coupling ChIP-chip/ChIP-seq with genetic, chemical, and experimental manipulation to obtain mechanistic insight from genome-wide protein-DNA binding studies. We have employed these techniques to discern immature promoter-proximal Pol II from productively elongating Pol II, and infer a critical role for the transition between initiation and full elongation competence in regulating development and gene induction in response to environmental signals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel A Gilchrist
- Laboratory of Molecular Carcinogenesis, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gilchrist DA, Nechaev S, Lee C, Ghosh SKB, Collins JB, Li L, Gilmour DS, Adelman K. NELF-mediated stalling of Pol II can enhance gene expression by blocking promoter-proximal nucleosome assembly. Genes Dev 2008; 22:1921-33. [PMID: 18628398 DOI: 10.1101/gad.1643208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 232] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
The Negative Elongation Factor (NELF) is a transcription regulatory complex that induces stalling of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) during early transcription elongation and represses expression of several genes studied to date, including Drosophila Hsp70, mammalian proto-oncogene junB, and HIV RNA. To determine the full spectrum of NELF target genes in Drosophila, we performed a microarray analysis of S2 cells depleted of NELF and discovered that NELF RNAi affects many rapidly inducible genes involved in cellular responses to stimuli. Surprisingly, only one-third of NELF target genes were, like Hsp70, up-regulated by NELF-depletion, whereas the majority of target genes showed decreased expression levels upon NELF RNAi. Our data reveal that the presence of stalled Pol II at this latter group of genes enhances gene expression by maintaining a permissive chromatin architecture around the promoter-proximal region, and that loss of Pol II stalling at these promoters is accompanied by a significant increase in nucleosome occupancy and a decrease in histone H3 Lys 4 trimethylation. These findings identify a novel, positive role for stalled Pol II in regulating gene expression and suggest that there is a dynamic interplay between stalled Pol II and chromatin structure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel A Gilchrist
- Laboratory of Molecular Carcinogenesis, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kennedy MA, Nechaev S, Gilchrist DA, Muse GW, Chinenov Y, Adelman K, Rogatsky I. 172 Regulation of TNFα gene transcription at the post-initiation step. Cytokine 2008. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cyto.2008.07.234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
16
|
Muse GW, Gilchrist DA, Nechaev S, Shah R, Parker JS, Grissom SF, Zeitlinger J, Adelman K. RNA polymerase is poised for activation across the genome. Nat Genet 2007; 39:1507-11. [PMID: 17994021 DOI: 10.1038/ng.2007.21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 583] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2007] [Accepted: 09/07/2007] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Regulation of gene expression is integral to the development and survival of all organisms. Transcription begins with the assembly of a pre-initiation complex at the gene promoter, followed by initiation of RNA synthesis and the transition to productive elongation. In many cases, recruitment of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) to a promoter is necessary and sufficient for activation of genes. However, there are a few notable exceptions to this paradigm, including heat shock genes and several proto-oncogenes, whose expression is attenuated by regulated stalling of polymerase elongation within the promoter-proximal region. To determine the importance of polymerase stalling for transcription regulation, we carried out a genome-wide search for Drosophila melanogaster genes with Pol II stalled within the promoter-proximal region. Our data show that stalling is widespread, occurring at hundreds of genes that respond to stimuli and developmental signals. This finding indicates a role for regulation of polymerase elongation in the transcriptional responses to dynamic environmental and developmental cues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ginger W Muse
- Laboratory of Molecular Carcinogenesis, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|