Consensus Conference Statement on the General Use of Near-infrared Fluorescence Imaging and Indocyanine Green Guided Surgery: Results of a Modified Delphi Study

BACKGROUND

In recent decades, the use of near-infrared light and fluorescence-guidance during open and laparoscopic surgery has exponentially expanded across various clinical settings. However, tremendous variability exists in how it is performed.

OBJECTIVE

In this first published survey of international experts on fluorescence-guided surgery, we sought to identify areas of consensus and nonconsensus across 4 areas of practice: fundamentals; patient selection/preparation; technical aspects; and effectiveness and safety.

METHODS

A Delphi survey was conducted among 19 international experts in fluorescence-guided surgery attending a 1-day consensus meeting in Frankfurt, Germany on September 8th, 2019. Using mobile phones, experts were asked to anonymously vote over 2 rounds of voting, with 70% and 80% set as a priori thresholds for consensus and vote robustness, respectively.

RESULTS

Experts from 5 continents reached consensus on 41 of 44 statements, including strong consensus that near-infrared fluorescence-guided surgery is both effective and safe across a broad variety of clinical settings, including the localization of critical anatomical structures like vessels, detection of tumors and sentinel nodes, assessment of tissue perfusion and anastomotic leaks, delineation of segmented organs, and localization of parathyroid glands. Although the minimum and maximum safe effective dose of ICG were felt to be 1 to 2 mg and >10 mg, respectively, there was strong consensus that determining the optimum dose, concentration, route and timing of ICG administration should be an ongoing research focus.

CONCLUSIONS

Although fluorescence imaging was almost unanimously perceived to be both effective and safe across a broad range of clinical settings, considerable further research remains necessary to optimize its use.

Assessing the development status of intraoperative fluorescence imaging for perfusion assessments, using the IDEAL framework

Objectives

Intraoperative fluorescence imaging is currently used in a variety of surgical fields for four main purposes: assessing tissue perfusion; identifying/localizing cancer; mapping lymphatic systems; and visualizing anatomy. To establish evidence-based guidance for research and practice, understanding the state of research on fluorescence imaging in different surgical fields is needed. We evaluated the evidence on fluorescence imaging for perfusion assessments using the Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, Long Term Study (IDEAL) framework, which was designed for describing the stages of innovation in surgery and other interventional procedures.

Design

Narrative literature review with analysis of IDEAL stage of each field of study.

Setting

All publications on intraoperative fluorescence imaging for perfusion assessments reported in PubMed through 2019 were identified for six surgical procedures: coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), upper gastrointestinal (GI) surgery, colorectal surgery, solid organ transplantation, reconstructive surgery, and cerebral aneurysm surgery.

Main outcome measures

The IDEAL stage of research evidence was determined for each specialty field using a previously described approach.

Results

196 articles (15 003 cases) were selected for analysis. Current status of research evidence was determined to be IDEAL Stage 2a for upper GI and transplantation surgery, IDEAL 2b for CABG, colorectal and cerebral aneurysm surgery, and IDEAL Stage 3 for reconstructive surgery. Using the technique resulted in a high (up to 50%) rate of revisions among surgical procedures, but its efficacy improving postoperative outcomes has not yet been demonstrated by randomized controlled trials in any discipline. Only one possible adverse reaction to intravenous indocyanine green was reported.

Conclusions

Using fluorescence imaging intraoperatively to assess perfusion is feasible and appears useful for surgical decision making across a range of disciplines. Identifying the IDEAL stage of current research knowledge aids in planning further studies to establish the potential for patient benefit.

Transmyocardial Laser Therapy: A Strategic Approach

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery bypass and percutaneous intervention have become the established methods of coronary revascularization in treating angina pectoris. Subsets of angina patients, however, are not amenable to either of these procedures. Transmyocardial laser revascularization (TMR) has been developed as a potential treatment to address such patients, and clinical research to date illustrates the success of TMR for this patient group.

STRATEGIC PLAN SUMMARY

Although the symptoms of ischemic heart disease manifest themselves in a variety of ways, the best results with TMR are seen in patients with severe angina rather than in patients with silent ischemia or congestive heart failure. Potential TMR patients receive diagnostic tests to determine if and where the therapy should be applied. A recent cardiac catheterization is required to document the status of and the coronary-system suitability for the planned intervention. It is not appropriate to assume that a patient with nonbypassable, noninterventional coronary artery disease has to be relegated to medical therapy only. Additionally, echocardiography demonstrates the status of cardiac valves and segmental wall motion activity. This knowledge allows the surgeon to determine the sequence of surgery and if abnormalities are present. Once the decision to use TMR use has been made, there are 2 approaches--sole therapy or adjunctive therapy. TMR is not to be substituted for a feasible bypass graft, but the best time to make this decision may well be during the surgery itself, because grafts that appear surgically feasible on an angiogram may be less feasible after the chest has been opened. The decision to perform sole-therapy TMR in the absence of bypassable vessels clearly must be made before opening the chest. Whether to use cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and the sequence in which to perform TMR and bypass grafts are based on surgeon preference. The advantage of performing TMR on CPB is that channels can quickly be lased without pause. A potential advantage of performing TMR before bypass grafts is that "channel leak" (bleeding) can be minimized by the conclusion of the surgery. Complete revascularization has become technically more difficult because of the increasing use of percutaneous approaches and because patients are being referred for coronary artery bypass grafting much later in the course of their coronary disease progression than before. TMR may well be a viable alternative to bypassing a heavily diseased, previously intervened, small-diameter coronary artery. Thus, a model in which myocardial perfusion is considered within the context of the natural circulation can be conceived as an alternative to a model in which circulation is altered by interventional, surgical, and/or transmyocardial methods. TMR has been shown to be effective in accomplishing a complete revascularization when the restoration of circulation to ischemic territories with interventional therapy, bypass surgery, or a combination of both has been ineffective. We recommend that interested users follow this "complete revascularization strategy" algorithm for all ischemic vessels being considered for interventional or surgical treatment. Running each diseased vessel through this thought process will ensure that available treatment options are considered in the optimization of a patient's outcome.

CONCLUSION

The use of TMR for angina relief has evolved into a clinically proven technology that has enabled physicians to address difficult revascularization cases with a therapy that is safe and effective.

Surgical treatment of prosthetic valve endocarditis

From 1975 through 1992, we reoperated on 146 patients for the treatment of prosthetic valve endocarditis. Prosthetic valve endocarditis was considered to be early (< 1 year after operation) in 46 cases and active in 103 cases. The extent of the infection was prosthesis only in 66 patients, anulus in 46, and cardiac invasion in 34. Surgical techniques evolved in the direction of increasingly radical débridement of infected tissue and reconstruction with biologic materials. All patients were treated with prolonged postoperative antibiotic therapy. There were 19 (13%) in-hospital deaths. Univariate analyses demonstrated trends toward increasing risk for patients with active endocarditis and extension of infection beyond the prosthesis; however, the only variables with a significant (p < 0.05) association with increased in-hospital mortality confirmed with multivariate testing were impaired left ventricular function, preoperative heart block, coronary artery disease, and culture of organisms from the surgical specimen. During the study period, mortality decreased from 20% (1975 to 1984) to 10% (1984 to 1992). For hospital survivors the mean length of stay was 25 days. Follow-up (mean interval 62 months) documented a late survival of 82% at 5 postoperative years and 60% at 10 years. Older age was the only factor associated (p = 0.006) with late death. Nineteen patients needed at least one further operation; reoperation-free survival was 75% at 5 and 50% at 10 postoperative years. Fever in the immediate preoperative period was the only factor associated with decreased late reoperation-free survival (p = 0.032). Prosthetic valve endocarditis remains a serious complication of valve replacement, but the in-hospital mortality of reoperations for prosthetic valve endocarditis has declined. With extensive débridement of infected tissue and postoperative antibiotic therapy, the extent and activity of prosthetic valve endocarditis does not appear to have a major impact on late outcome, and the majority of patients with this complication survive for 10 years after the operation.

Nonuniform loss of regional flow reserve during myocardial ischemia in dogs

To determine whether coronary vasodilator reserve that persists during myocardial ischemia is present in all left ventricular regions, we measured regional blood flow in 192 left ventricular pieces (mean weight, 201 mg) in each of eight dogs by using radioactive microspheres while perfusing the left main coronary artery at 70, 50, 40, and 30 mm Hg. Flows were measured before and during adenosine infusion to determine flow reserve. Perfusion at 40 and 30 mm Hg produced ischemia in all dogs. At 70 mm Hg, 100% of left ventricular regions had significant flow reserve, compared with 92%, 55%, and 8% during perfusion at 50, 40, and 30 mm Hg, respectively. A greater amount of flow reserve and a greater number of regions responded to adenosine in the subepicardium than in the subendocardium at 50, 40, and 30 mm Hg. We conclude that coronary flow reserve persists in only a subset of left ventricular regions during ischemia and that the number of regions with persistent flow reserve decreases with perfusion pressure. These findings may best be explained by a model in which regional ischemia is a maximal coronary vasodilator and persistent pharmacological vasodilator reserve seen when global markers indicate ischemia simply reflects persistent endogenous flow reserve in myocardial regions not yet ischemic.