Activation of the ACE2/Ang-(1-7)/Mas pathway reduces oxygen-glucose deprivation-induced tissue swelling, ROS production, and cell death in mouse brain with angiotensin II overproduction

We previously demonstrated that mice which overexpress human renin and angiotensinogen (R+A+) show enhanced cerebral damage in both in vivo and in vitro experimental ischemia models. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) counteracts the effects of angiotensin (Ang-II) by transforming it into Ang-(1-7), thus reducing the ligand for the AT1 receptor and increasing stimulation of the Mas receptor. Triple transgenic mice, SARA, which specifically overexpress ACE2 in neurons of R+A+ mice were used to study the role of ACE2 in ischemic stroke using oxygen and glucose deprivation (OGD) of brain slices as an in vitro model. We examined tissue swelling, the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and cell death in the cerebral cortex (CX) and the hippocampal CA1 region during OGD. Expression levels of NADPH oxidase (Nox) isoforms, Nox2 and Nox4 were measured using western blots. Results show that SARA mice and R+A+ mice treated with the Mas receptor agonist Ang-(1-7) had less swelling, cell death, and ROS production in CX and CA1 areas compared to those in R+A+ animals. Treatment of slices from SARA mice with the Mas antagonist A779 eliminated this protection. Finally, western blots revealed less Nox2 and Nox4 expression in SARA mice compared with R+A+ mice both before and after OGD. We suggest that reduced brain swelling and cell death observed in SARA animals exposed to OGD result from diminished ROS production coupled with lower expression of Nox isoforms. Thus, the ACE2/Ang-(1-7)/Mas receptor pathway plays a protective role in brain ischemic damage by counteracting the detrimental effects of Ang-II-induced ROS production.

Fluoxetine-induced pressor response in freely moving rats: a role for vasopressin and sympathetic tone

The present study was performed in order to assess, in freely moving rats, the cardiovascular effects of central administration of fluoxetine, a serotonin reuptake inhibitor. Two kinds of experiments were performed: 1) acute central administration of fluoxetine. and 2) chronic intraperitoneal administration of fluoxetine plus selegiline, a monoamine oxidase B inhibitor. Intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of fluoxetine (5-50 microg) induced an increase in blood pressure. This fluoxetine-induced pressor response reached its maximal 1 hour after injection without any significant change in heart rate. At the dose of 10 microg i.c.v., fluoxetine significantly increased mean blood pressure by 16 +/- 4 mmHg. This pressor response was reduced by an intravenous (i.v.) pretreatment with the alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonist, prazosin (500 microg kg(-1)) (+ 7 +/- 4 mmHg, P <0.05) or with the V1A-vasopressin receptor antagonist (20 microg kg(-1)) (+5 +/- 3 mmHg, P < 0.05). The pressor response was completely abolished by a concomitant pretreatment with prazosin plus the V1A-vasopressin receptor antagonist. Pretreatment with the beta-adrenoceptor antagonist, propranolol (1 mg kg(-1) i.v.), or the 5-HT2 receptor antagonist, ketanserine (5 mg kg(-1) i.v.), did not modify the fluoxetine-induced pressor response. In freely moving rats receiving fluoxetine (10 microg i.c.v.), vasopressin plasma levels were significantly higher (39 +/- 5 pg mL(-1) than in rats receiving 10 microL i.c.v. saline (14 +/- 4 pg mL(-1)). A 30 day intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of fluoxetine in association with selegiline induced an increase in noradrenaline plasma levels and locomotor activity without any significant change in blood pressure and heart rate. These data suggest that, the pressor response elicited by central acute administration of fluoxetine is mediated by both an increase in sympathetic tone and vasopressin release. This observation could suggest the putative interest of alpha1-adrenoceptor and or V1A-vasopressin receptor antagonists in the treatment of "Serotonin Syndrome".

Characterization of the central muscarinic cholinoceptors involved in the cholinergic pressor response in anesthetized dogs

Previous reports have shown that an intracisternal (i.c.) injection of acetylcholine in the dog increases both arterial blood pressure and plasma levels of noradrenaline and vasopressin via central muscarinic receptors. The aim of the present study was to characterize the central muscarinic cholinoceptor subtypes involved in such central cholinergic responses in anesthetized male Beagle-Harrier dogs (n = 12). For this purpose, we studied the relative potency of various muscarinic receptor antagonists to block the acetylcholine-induced pressor responses (30 microg kg(-1) i.c.). The acetylcholine-induced pressor response was inhibited in a dose-dependent manner by the i.c. administration of the non-selective muscarinic receptor antagonist atropine (ID50 = 0.5 microg kg(-1)), the muscarinic M receptor antagonist pirenzepine (ID50 = 0.45 microg kg(-1)), the muscarinic M2 receptor antagonist methoctramine (ID50 = 8.5 microg kg(-1)) and the muscarinic M3 receptor antagonist para-fluoro-hexahydro-sila-difenidol (ID50) = 43.7 microg kg(-1)). The order of potency of these four muscarinic receptor antagonists was: atropine = pirenzepine > methoctramine >> para-fluoro-hexahydro-sila-difenidol. In order to confirm the selectivity for muscarinic M1 receptors of this dose of pirenzepine, we checked that 40- to 50-fold higher concentrations were necessary to block a typical muscarinic M2 receptor response (bradycardia) and a typical muscarinic M3 receptor response (endothelial vasodilation) compared with methoctramine and para-fluoro-hexahydro-sila-difenidol, respectively. These results suggest that the pressor response elicited by intracisternal injection of acetylcholine in anesthetized Beagle-Harrier dogs is mediated through the activation of the muscarinic M1 cholinoceptor subtype.

Spontaneously hypertensive rats cholinergic hyper-responsiveness: central and peripheral pharmacological mechanisms

1. The mechanisms and the subtypes of muscarinic receptors implicated in the cardiovascular effects of physostigmine were investigated in conscious normotensive and spontaneously hypertensive rats. 2. Intravenous (i.v.) physostigmine (50 microg kg-1) induced in both strains a long pressor response, accompanied by a bradycardia. This pressor response was larger in spontaneously hypertensive (+41+/-6 mmHg) than in Wistar-Kyoto (+25+/-2 mmHg) rats (P<0.05). 3. Pretreatment with atropine sulphate (0.4 mg kg-1 i.v.), completely abolished the physostigmine-induced pressor response in both normotensive and hypertensive rats. In both strains, the physostigmine pressor response was significantly reduced by the systemic administration of either an alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonist (prazosin, 1 mg kg-1) or a V1A-vasopressin receptor antagonist (AVPX, 20 microg kg-1). This physostigmine pressor effect was completely abolished in both strains when both antagonists were administered concomitantly. 4. In WKY rats, the pressor response to physostigmine (50 microg kg-1 i.v.) was inhibited in a dose-dependent manner by i. c.v. administration of atropine (ID50=3.70 nmoles), the M1 receptor antagonist pirenzepine (ID50=10.71 nmoles), the M2 receptor antagonist methoctramine (ID50=4.31 nmoles), the M3 receptor antagonist p-F-HHSiD (ID50=60.52 nmoles) and the M4 receptor antagonist tropicamide (ID50=214.20 nmoles). In the hypertensive strain, the ID50 were found to be significantly higher for atropine (7.34 nmoles), pirenzepine (21.60 nmoles) and p-F-HHSiD (139.50 nmoles) (P<0.05). 5. The present results indicate that physostigmine acts in normotensive and spontaneously hypertensive rats, through stimulation of both central M2 and M1 cholinoceptors to induce a rise in blood pressure mediated by an increase in plasma vasopressin and sympathetic outflow. Moreover, our results suggest that some modifications of the M1 receptor subtypes in terms of expression or affinity could be responsible for the hyper-responsiveness of the hypertensive strain to cholinomimetic agents.

[Reduction of the pressor effect of fluoxetine after V1A-vasopressin receptor blockade in the conscious rats]

Pharmacovigilance data have reported some cases of arterial hypertension in patients treated with serotonin reuptake inhibitors. This side effect is now called serotonin syndrome. Moreover, some authors have shown that these drugs could reduce, at least in part, the fall in blood pressure (BP) observed in experimental models or in human forms of orthostatic hypotension, suggesting a modulation of the autonomic nervous system by these drugs. These data led us to study in freely moving Wistar rats the mechanisms involved and the putative involvement of autonomic nervous system. Intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of fluoxetine (5-50 micrograms) induced an increase in BP similar to which was obtained following central administration of serotonin (5-HT) (0.5-5 micrograms). After 5-HT, the pressor effect was immediate (1 min following injection) and involved the baroreflex pathway (bradycardia). The fluoxetine-induced pressor response reached its maximal 1 hour after injection without any significant change in heart rate (HR). At the dose of 10 micrograms i.c.v., fluoxetine significantly increased mean BP by 16 +/- 4 mmHg. This pressor response was partially but significantly reduced by a pretreatment by the alpha 1-adrenoreceptor antagonist, prazosin (500 micrograms.kg-1 i.v.) (+7 +/- 4 mmHg, p < 0.05) or by a V1A-vasopressin receptor antagonist (20 micrograms.kg-1 i.v.) (+5 +/- 3 mmHg, p < 0.05). However, pretreatment by the beta-adrenoreceptor antagonist, propranolol (1 mg.kg-1 i.v.) and the antagonist 5-HT2, ketanserine (5 mg.kg-1 i.v.) did not modify the fluoxetine-induced pressor response. In freely moving rats receiving fluoxetine (10 micrograms i.c.v.), vasopressin plasma levels were significantly higher (+39 +/- 5 pg.mL-1) than in rats receiving saline (100 microL i.c.v.) (+14 +/- 4 pg.mL-1), thus confirming the involvement of vasopressinergic mechanisms in the fluoxetine-induced pressor response. These data suggest that in freely moving Wistar rats, central acute administration of fluoxetine induces a pressor response mediated by both an increase in sympathetic tone and a vasopressin release. This observation could suggest the putative use of alpha 1-adrenoreceptors antagonists and/or V1A-vasopressin receptor antagonists in the treatment of the serotonin syndrome.

Endogenous central cholinergic systems and baroreflex modulation in the conscious dog

Intracisternal atropine and mecamylamine failed to modify baroreflex sensitivity in dogs, suggesting a lack of cholinergic neurons integrated in baroreflex pathways. Conversely, neostigmine lowered baroreflex sensitivity suggesting a putative cholinergic modulation.

Pressor and bradycardic effects of tacrine and other acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in the rat

The cardiovascular effects of three different acetylcholinesterase inhibitors: physostigmine, tacrine and rivastigmine injected by intravenous (i.v.) route were compared in freely moving Wistar rats. The three drugs significantly increased both systolic and diastolic blood pressure and decreased heart rate. Compared to physostigmine, a 20-fold higher dose of tacrine and a 40-fold higher dose of rivastigmine was necessary to induce a comparable pressor effect. Tacrine was chosen as a model to study the mechanisms underlying the cardiovascular effects of i.v. cholinesterase inhibitors. Atropine totally abolished while methylatropine did not affect tacrine pressor effects. Conversely, both drugs abolished tacrine-induced bradycardia. The alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonist prazosin or the vasopressin V1 receptor antagonist, [beta-mercapto-beta,beta-cyclopenta-methylenepropionyl1, O-Me-Tyr2, Arg8] vasopressin partially but significantly reduced tacrine pressor effect and mostly abolished it when administered concomitantly. The tacrine pressor response was inhibited in a dose-dependent manner by the i.c.v. administration of the non-selective muscarinic receptor antagonist atropine (ID50 = 1.45 microg), the muscarinic M1 receptor antagonist pirenzepine (ID50 = 4.33 microg), the muscarinic M2 receptor antagonist methoctramine (ID50 = 1.39 microg) and the muscarinic M3 receptor antagonist para-fluoro-hexahydro-sila-difenidol (ID50 = 31.19 microg). Central injection of such muscarinic receptor antagonists did not affect tacrine-induced bradycardia. Our results show that acetylcholinesterase inhibitors induce significant cardiovascular effects with a pressor response mediated mainly by the stimulation of central muscarinic M2 receptors inducing a secondary increase in sympathetic outflow and vasopressin release. Conversely, acetylcholinesterase inhibitor-induced bradycardia appears to be mediated by peripheral muscarinic mechanisms.

Central cardiovascular effects of tacrine in the conscious dog: a role for catecholamines and vasopressin release

Centrally acting cholinergic agents are currently reported to increase blood pressure in various species through the stimulation of muscarinic cholinoceptors. Moreover, several cardiovascular adverse effects have been reported from clinical studies. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of tacrine, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor which has been reported to have therapeutic potential in Alzheimer's disease, on blood pressure and two vasopressor systems (sympathetic and vasopressinergic) in Beagle dogs. Intravenous (i.v.) tacrine (2 mg kg(-1)) induced, in conscious and anesthetized dogs, an increase in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, accompanied by bradycardia. This increase was dose-dependent with a peak effect at 1.5 min following administration. Tacrine also induced an increase in noradrenaline, adrenaline and vasopressin plasma levels. Pretreatment with the muscarinic receptor antagonist, atropine (2 mg kg(-1), i.v.), abolished the pressor response to i.v. injection of tacrine while pretreatment with the peripheral muscarinic receptor antagonist, methylscopolamine (0.2 mg kg(-1), i.v.), did not alter the increase in blood pressure. Similarly, noradrenaline and adrenaline changes in plasma levels were not modified by methylscopolamine but were abolished by atropine pretreatment. A similar tendency although not significant was observed for vasopressin plasma levels. The present results demonstrate that in dogs, tacrine (2 mg kg(-1), i.v.) stimulates central muscarinic cholinoceptors to increase blood pressure through activation of the two components of the sympathetic nervous system (i.e., neuroneuronal noradrenergic and the neurohormonal adrenergic pathways) as well as through increasing noradrenaline, adrenaline and vasopressin plasma levels.

Central cardiovascular effects of acetylcholine in the conscious dog

1. The effects of central cholinomimetic drugs on cardiovascular and vasoactive hormonal responses (blood pressure, heart rate, catecholamines, vasopressin, atrial natriuretic factor, neuropeptide Y plasma levels and plasma renin activity) were investigated in conscious Beagle dogs. For this purpose a catheter was chronically implanted into each dog's cisterna magna to allow repeated central injections in the awake animals. 2. Intracisternal acetylcholine (20 micrograms kg-1) significantly increased systolic and diastolic blood pressure. These changes were accompanied by an initial short term tachycardia followed by a long lasting bradycardia. Intracisternal acetylcholine also increased noradrenaline, adrenaline and vasopressin plasma levels, decreased plasma renin activity but did not modify plasma levels of neuropeptide Y and atrial natriuretic factor. 3. The effects of acetylcholine were completely abolished by pretreatment with intracisternal injection of the muscarinic antagonist, atropine (5 micrograms kg-1) but not by the intracisternal injection of the nicotinic antagonist, mecamylamine (25 micrograms kg-1). 4. The present results demonstrate that there are qualitative and quantitative differences between the central cardiovascular effects of acetylcholine in conscious dogs compared to what we previously reported, using a comparable protocol, in anaesthetized dogs. Under both conditions, we observed a central cholinergically mediated increase in blood pressure secondary to an increase in sympathetic tone and vasopressin release but these responses were shorter (less than 10 min) in the conscious dogs than in anaesthetized dogs (more than 10 min). Moreover, we detected in the response to the central cholinergic stimulation in the conscious dogs a significant increase in plasma adrenaline levels and biphasic changes in heart rate which were not described previously in the anaesthetized dog.