Lipopolysaccharide induction of THP-1 cells activates binding of c-Jun, Ets, and Egr-1 to the tissue factor promoter

These studies examine the molecular basis for increased transcription of tissue factor (TF) in THP-1 cells stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS). DNase I footprinting identified six sites of protein-DNA interaction between -383 and the cap site that varied between control and induced extracts. Four footprints show qualitative differences in nuclease sensitivity. Footprints I (-85 to -52) and V (-197 to -175) are induction-specific and localize to regions of the promoter that mediate serum, phorbol ester, partial LPS response (-111 to +14), and the major LPS-inducible element (-231 to -172). Electrophoretic mobility shift assays with the -231 to -172 probe demonstrate JunD and Fos binding in both control and induced nuclear extracts; however, binding of c-Jun is only detected following LPS stimulation. Antibody inhibition studies implicate binding of Ets-1 or Ets-2 to the consensus site between -192 and -177, a region that contains an induction-specific footprint. The proximal region (-85 to -52), containing the second inducible footprint, binds Egr-1 following induction. These data suggest that LPS stimulation of THP-1 cells activates binding of c-Jun, Ets, and Egr-1 to the TF promoter and implicates these factors in the transcriptional activation of TF mRNA synthesis.

Characterization of the distal alpha-fetoprotein enhancer, a strong, long distance, liver-specific activator

High level expression of the alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) gene is controlled by three upstream enhancers which function even in hepatic cell lines that repress the AFP gene promoter. The most distal ("Complex 3," at -6 kilobases) is the strongest in HepG2 cells. We mapped the main activity of Complex 3 to a 170-base pair (BP) region from -6069 to -5900; progressive deletion of the 5'- and 3'-ends identified an 84-bp segment which accounted for 90% of enhancer activity. Expression studies, which combined the deleted Complex 3 with an AFP or tk promoter chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene fusion, resolved five regions in the enhancer (Ia, Ib, II, III, and IV). Deletion of Regions Ia or II strongly reduced stimulation of the AFP promoter, while Regions Ia and Ib were essential for stimulation of the tk promoter. Footprinting indicated multiple binding sites in regions Ia, Ib, and II. Gel shift and oligonucleotide competition demonstrated that Regions Ia and II had high affinity HNF3- and C/EBP-binding sites, respectively, while additional unidentified factors bound throughout Regions I-III. Complex 3 is a powerful liver-specific transcriptional regulator and an important model of long distance gene activation.

Enhancer, repressor, and promoter specificities combine to regulate the rat alpha-fetoprotein gene

The upstream transcription control region of the rat alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) gene was analyzed using transient expression of CAT genes in HepG2 cells which express the gene; H4C3 cells which repress the AFP gene but express the albumin gene; and four nonexpressing cell lines. Deletion analysis based on the DNA sequence resolved three upstream enhancers corresponding to the mouse AFP enhancers, but showed additional weak effects from flanking sequences. Quantitative experiments demonstrated that the three enhancers were additive when acting through a single promoter and did not confirm the presence of a distal upstream repressor. All three enhancers stimulated the AFP, albumin, or thymidine kinase (tk) promoter in HepG2, but only the tk and albumin promoters in H4C3. Deletion of a proximal repressor region near the AFP promoter allowed expression in H4C3 cells with the AFP promoter. Thus, the liver-specific developmental repressor is near the AFP promoter, and H4C3 cells provide an in vitro system for analysis of this repressor in transfection assays. The repressor region also blocked expression of the SV40 enhancer through the AFP promoter in hepatic and nonhepatic cell lines, but when this enhancer was combined with an AFP promoter from which the repressor region was deleted, the combination showed expression in all six cell lines studied. AFP expression results from a combination of enhancer, promoter, and repressor activities, and the repressor is functional with a heterologous enhancer in a variety of cells.