1
|
Boddu PC, Gupta AK, Roy R, De La Peña Avalos B, Olazabal-Herrero A, Neuenkirchen N, Zimmer JT, Chandhok NS, King D, Nannya Y, Ogawa S, Lin H, Simon MD, Dray E, Kupfer GM, Verma A, Neugebauer KM, Pillai MM. Transcription elongation defects link oncogenic SF3B1 mutations to targetable alterations in chromatin landscape. Mol Cell 2024; 84:1475-1495.e18. [PMID: 38521065 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2024.02.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Revised: 11/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Abstract
Transcription and splicing of pre-messenger RNA are closely coordinated, but how this functional coupling is disrupted in human diseases remains unexplored. Using isogenic cell lines, patient samples, and a mutant mouse model, we investigated how cancer-associated mutations in SF3B1 alter transcription. We found that these mutations reduce the elongation rate of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) along gene bodies and its density at promoters. The elongation defect results from disrupted pre-spliceosome assembly due to impaired protein-protein interactions of mutant SF3B1. The decreased promoter-proximal RNAPII density reduces both chromatin accessibility and H3K4me3 marks at promoters. Through an unbiased screen, we identified epigenetic factors in the Sin3/HDAC/H3K4me pathway, which, when modulated, reverse both transcription and chromatin changes. Our findings reveal how splicing factor mutant states behave functionally as epigenetic disorders through impaired transcription-related changes to the chromatin landscape. We also present a rationale for targeting the Sin3/HDAC complex as a therapeutic strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prajwal C Boddu
- Section of Hematology, Yale Cancer Center and Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, 300 George Street, Suite 786, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | - Abhishek K Gupta
- Section of Hematology, Yale Cancer Center and Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, 300 George Street, Suite 786, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | - Rahul Roy
- Section of Hematology, Yale Cancer Center and Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, 300 George Street, Suite 786, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | - Bárbara De La Peña Avalos
- Department of Biochemistry and Structural Biology, University of Texas Health Science Center (UTHSC) at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Anne Olazabal-Herrero
- Section of Hematology, Yale Cancer Center and Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, 300 George Street, Suite 786, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | - Nils Neuenkirchen
- Department of Cell Biology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Yale Stem Cell Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Joshua T Zimmer
- Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Namrata S Chandhok
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Darren King
- Section of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine and Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Yasuhito Nannya
- Department of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Seishi Ogawa
- Department of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Haifan Lin
- Department of Cell Biology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Yale Stem Cell Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Matthew D Simon
- Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Eloise Dray
- Department of Biochemistry and Structural Biology, University of Texas Health Science Center (UTHSC) at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Gary M Kupfer
- Department of Oncology and Pediatrics, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Amit Verma
- Division of Hemato-Oncology, Department of Medicine and Department of Developmental and Molecular Biology, Albert Einstein-Montefiore Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Karla M Neugebauer
- Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Yale Center for RNA Science and Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Manoj M Pillai
- Section of Hematology, Yale Cancer Center and Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, 300 George Street, Suite 786, New Haven, CT 06511, USA; Yale Stem Cell Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Yale Center for RNA Science and Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nelson CB, Rogers S, Roychoudhury K, Tan YS, Atkinson CJ, Sobinoff AP, Tomlinson CG, Hsu A, Lu R, Dray E, Haber M, Fletcher JI, Cesare AJ, Hegde RS, Pickett HA. The Eyes Absent family members EYA4 and EYA1 promote PLK1 activation and successful mitosis through tyrosine dephosphorylation. Nat Commun 2024; 15:1385. [PMID: 38360978 PMCID: PMC10869800 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-45683-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024] Open
Abstract
The Eyes Absent proteins (EYA1-4) are a biochemically unique group of tyrosine phosphatases known to be tumour-promoting across a range of cancer types. To date, the targets of EYA phosphatase activity remain largely uncharacterised. Here, we identify Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) as an interactor and phosphatase substrate of EYA4 and EYA1, with pY445 on PLK1 being the primary target site. Dephosphorylation of pY445 in the G2 phase of the cell cycle is required for centrosome maturation, PLK1 localization to centrosomes, and polo-box domain (PBD) dependent interactions between PLK1 and PLK1-activation complexes. Molecular dynamics simulations support the rationale that pY445 confers a structural impairment to PBD-substrate interactions that is relieved by EYA-mediated dephosphorylation. Depletion of EYA4 or EYA1, or chemical inhibition of EYA phosphatase activity, dramatically reduces PLK1 activation, causing mitotic defects and cell death. Overall, we have characterized a phosphotyrosine signalling network governing PLK1 and mitosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher B Nelson
- Children's Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Samuel Rogers
- Children's Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Kaushik Roychoudhury
- Division of Developmental Biology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Yaw Sing Tan
- Bioinformatics Institute, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore
| | - Caroline J Atkinson
- Children's Cancer Institute, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW, Australia
| | - Alexander P Sobinoff
- Children's Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Christopher G Tomlinson
- Children's Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Anton Hsu
- Children's Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Robert Lu
- Children's Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Eloise Dray
- University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Michelle Haber
- Children's Cancer Institute, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW, Australia
| | - Jamie I Fletcher
- Children's Cancer Institute, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW, Australia
| | - Anthony J Cesare
- Children's Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Rashmi S Hegde
- Division of Developmental Biology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Hilda A Pickett
- Children's Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Conway PJ, Dao J, Kovalskyy D, Mahadevan D, Dray E. Polyploidy in Cancer: causal mechanisms, cancer-specific consequences, and emerging treatments. Mol Cancer Ther 2024:734096. [PMID: 38315992 DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-23-0578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 11/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
Drug resistance is the major determinant for metastatic disease and fatalities, across all cancers. Depending on the tissue of origin and the therapeutic course, a variety of biological mechanisms can support and sustain drug resistance. While genetic mutations and gene silencing through epigenetic mechanisms are major culprits in targeted therapy, drug efflux and polyploidization are more global mechanisms that prevail in a broad range of pathologies, in response to a variety of treatments. There is an unmet need to identify patients at risk for polyploidy, understand the mechanisms underlying polyploidization, and to develop strategies to predict, limit, and reverse polyploidy thus enhancing efficacy of standard of care therapy that improve better outcomes. This literature review provides an overview of polyploidy in cancer and offers perspective on patient monitoring and actionable therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick J Conway
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
| | - Jonathan Dao
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
| | - Dmytro Kovalskyy
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, United States
| | - Daruka Mahadevan
- University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Eloise Dray
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lee SO, Kelliher JL, Song W, Tengler K, Sarkar A, Dray E, Leung JWC. UBA80 and UBA52 fine-tune RNF168-dependent histone ubiquitination and DNA repair. J Biol Chem 2023; 299:105043. [PMID: 37451480 PMCID: PMC10413357 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.105043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2022] [Revised: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/02/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
The ubiquitin signaling pathway is crucial for the DNA damage response pathway. More specifically, RNF168 is integral in regulating DNA repair proteins at damaged chromatin. However, the detailed mechanism by which RNF168 is regulated in cells is not fully understood. Here, we identify the ubiquitin-ribosomal fusion proteins UBA80 (also known as RPS27A) and UBA52 (also known as RPL40) as interacting proteins for H2A/H2AX histones and RNF168. Both UBA80 and UBA52 are recruited to laser-induced micro-irradiation DNA damage sites and are required for DNA repair. Ectopic expression of UBA80 and UBA52 inhibits RNF168-mediated H2A/H2AX ubiquitination at K13/15 and impairs 53BP1 recruitment to DNA lesions. Mechanistically, the C-terminal ribosomal fragments of UBA80 and UBA52, S27A and L40, respectively, limit RNF168-nucleosome engagement by masking the regulatory acidic residues at E143/E144 and the nucleosome acidic patch. Together, our results reveal that UBA80 and UBA52 antagonize the ubiquitination signaling pathway and fine-tune the spatiotemporal regulation of DNA repair proteins at DNA damage sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seong-Ok Lee
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Jessica L Kelliher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Wan Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Kyle Tengler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Aradhan Sarkar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Eloise Dray
- Department of Biochemistry and Structural Biology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Justin W C Leung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Boddu PC, Gupta A, Roy R, De La Pena Avalos B, Herrero AO, Neuenkirchen N, Zimmer J, Chandhok N, King D, Nannya Y, Ogawa S, Lin H, Simon M, Dray E, Kupfer G, Verma AK, Neugebauer KM, Pillai MM. Transcription elongation defects link oncogenic splicing factor mutations to targetable alterations in chromatin landscape. bioRxiv 2023:2023.02.25.530019. [PMID: 36891287 PMCID: PMC9994134 DOI: 10.1101/2023.02.25.530019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
Transcription and splicing of pre-messenger RNA are closely coordinated, but how this functional coupling is disrupted in human disease remains unexplored. Here, we investigated the impact of non-synonymous mutations in SF3B1 and U2AF1, two commonly mutated splicing factors in cancer, on transcription. We find that the mutations impair RNA Polymerase II (RNAPII) transcription elongation along gene bodies leading to transcription-replication conflicts, replication stress and altered chromatin organization. This elongation defect is linked to disrupted pre-spliceosome assembly due to impaired association of HTATSF1 with mutant SF3B1. Through an unbiased screen, we identified epigenetic factors in the Sin3/HDAC complex, which, when modulated, normalize transcription defects and their downstream effects. Our findings shed light on the mechanisms by which oncogenic mutant spliceosomes impact chromatin organization through their effects on RNAPII transcription elongation and present a rationale for targeting the Sin3/HDAC complex as a potential therapeutic strategy. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT HIGHLIGHTS Oncogenic mutations of SF3B1 and U2AF1 cause a gene-body RNAPII elongation defectRNAPII transcription elongation defect leads to transcription replication conflicts, DNA damage response, and changes to chromatin organization and H3K4me3 marksThe transcription elongation defect is linked to disruption of the early spliceosome formation through impaired interaction of HTATSF1 with mutant SF3B1.Changes to chromatin organization reveal potential therapeutic strategies by targeting the Sin3/HDAC pathway.
Collapse
|
6
|
Muralimanoharan S, Shamby R, Stansbury N, Schenken R, de la Pena Avalos B, Javanmardi S, Dray E, Sung P, Boyer TG. Aberrant R-loop-induced replication stress in MED12-mutant uterine fibroids. Sci Rep 2022; 12:6169. [PMID: 35418189 PMCID: PMC9008039 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-10188-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Uterine fibroid (UF) driver mutations in Mediator complex subunit 12 (MED12) trigger genomic instability and tumor development through unknown mechanisms. Herein, we show that MED12 mutations trigger aberrant R-loop-induced replication stress, suggesting a possible route to genomic instability and a novel therapeutic vulnerability in this dominant UF subclass. Immunohistochemical analyses of patient-matched tissue samples revealed that MED12 mutation-positive UFs, compared to MED12 mutation-negative UFs and myometrium, exhibited significantly higher levels of R-loops and activated markers of Ataxia Telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) kinase-dependent replication stress signaling in situ. Single molecule DNA fiber analysis revealed that primary cells from MED12 mutation-positive UFs, compared to those from patient-matched MED12 mutation-negative UFs and myometrium, exhibited defects in replication fork dynamics, including reduced fork speeds, increased and decreased numbers of stalled and restarted forks, respectively, and increased asymmetrical bidirectional forks. Notably, these phenotypes were recapitulated and functionally linked in cultured uterine smooth muscle cells following chemical inhibition of Mediator-associated CDK8/19 kinase activity that is known to be disrupted by UF driver mutations in MED12. Thus, Mediator kinase inhibition triggered enhanced R-loop formation and replication stress leading to an S-phase cell cycle delay, phenotypes that were rescued by overexpression of the R-loop resolving enzyme RNaseH. Altogether, these findings reveal MED12-mutant UFs to be uniquely characterized by aberrant R-loop induced replication stress, suggesting a possible basis for genomic instability and new avenues for therapeutic intervention that involve the replication stress phenotype in this dominant UF subtype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sribalasubashini Muralimanoharan
- Department of Molecular Medicine, UT Health San Antonio, STRF, 8210 Floyd Curl Drive, Mail Code 8257, San Antonio, TX, 78229-3900, USA
| | - Ross Shamby
- Department of Molecular Medicine, UT Health San Antonio, STRF, 8210 Floyd Curl Drive, Mail Code 8257, San Antonio, TX, 78229-3900, USA
| | - Nicholas Stansbury
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Robert Schenken
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | | | - Samin Javanmardi
- Department of Molecular Medicine, UT Health San Antonio, STRF, 8210 Floyd Curl Drive, Mail Code 8257, San Antonio, TX, 78229-3900, USA
| | - Eloise Dray
- Department of Biochemistry and Structural Biology, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Patrick Sung
- Department of Biochemistry and Structural Biology, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Thomas G Boyer
- Department of Molecular Medicine, UT Health San Antonio, STRF, 8210 Floyd Curl Drive, Mail Code 8257, San Antonio, TX, 78229-3900, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kornepati A, Murray C, Avalos B, Rogers C, Ramkumar K, Gupta H, Deng Y, Liu Z, Padron A, Vadlamudi R, Dray E, Zhao W, Sung P, Byers L, Curiel T. 900 Depleting non-canonical, cell-intrinsic PD-L1 signals induces synthetic lethality to small molecule DNA damage response inhibitors in an immune independent and dependent manner. J Immunother Cancer 2021. [DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-sitc2021.900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundTumor surface-expressed programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) suppresses immunity when it engages programmed death-1 (PD-1) on anti-tumor immune cells in canonical PD-L1/PD-1.1 Non-canonical, tumour-intrinsic PD-L1 signals can mediate treatment resistance2–6 but mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Targeting non-canonical, cell-intrinsic PD-L1 signals, especially modulation of the DNA damage response (DDR), remains largely untapped.MethodsWe made PD-L1 knockout (PD-L1 KO) murine transplantable and human cell lines representing melanoma, bladder, and breast histologies. We used biochemical, genetic, and cell-biology techniques for mechanistic insights into tumor-intrinsic PD-L1 control of specific DDR and DNA repair pathways. We generated a novel inducible melanoma GEMM lacking PD-L1 only in melanocytes to corroborate DDR alterations observed in PD-L1 KO of established tumors.ResultsGenetic tumor PD-L1 depletion destabilized Chk2 and impaired ATM/Chk2, but not ATR/Chk1 DDR. PD-L1KO increased DNA damage (γH2AX) and impaired homologous recombination DNA repair (p-RPA32, BRCA1, RAD51 nuclear foci) and function (DR-GFP reporter). PD-L1 KO cells were significantly more sensitive versus controls to DDR inhibitors (DDRi) against ATR, Chk1, and PARP but not ATM in multiple human and mouse tumor models in vitro and in vivo in NSG mice. PD-1 independent, intracellular, not surface PD-L1 stabilized Chk2 protein with minimal Chek2 mRNA effect. Mechanistically, PD-L1 could directly complex with Chk2, protecting it from PIRH2-mediated polyubiquitination. PD-L1 N-terminal domains Ig-V and Ig-C but not the PD-L1 C-terminal tail co-IP’d with Chk2 and restored Chk1 inhibitor (Chk1i) treatment resistance. Tumor PD-L1 expression correlated with Chk1i sensitivity in 44 primary human small cell lung cancer cell lines, implicating tumor-intrinsic PD-L1 as a DDRi response biomarker. In WT mice, genetic PD-L1 depletion but not surface PD-L1 blockade with αPD-L1, sensitized immunotherapy-resistant, BRCA1-WT 4T1 tumors to PARP inhibitor (PARPi). PARPi effects were reduced on PD-L1 KO tumors in RAG2KO mice indicating immune-dependent DDRi efficacy. Tumor PD-L1 depletion, likely due to impaired DDR, enhanced PARPi induced tumor-intrinsic STING activation (e.g., p-TBK1, CCL5) suggesting potential to augment immunotherapies.ConclusionsWe challenge the prevailing surface PD-L1 paradigm and establish a novel mechanism for cell-intrinsic PD-L1 control of the DDR and gene product expression. We identify therapeutic vulnerabilities from tumor PD-L1 depletion utilizing small molecule DDRi currently being tested in clinical trials. Data could explain αPD-L1/DDRi treatment resistance. Intracellular PD-L1 could be a pharmacologically targetable treatment target and/or response biomarker for selective DDRi alone plus other immunotherapies.ReferencesTopalian SL, Taube JM, Anders RA, Pardoll DM. Mechanism-driven biomarkers to guide immune checkpoint blockade in cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 16:275–287, doi:10.1038/nrc.2016.36 (2016).Clark CA, et al. Tumor-intrinsic PD-L1 signals regulate cell growth, pathogenesis and autophagy in ovarian cancer and melanoma. Canres 0258.2016 (2016).Gupta HB et al. Tumor cell-intrinsic PD-L1 promotes tumor-initiating cell generation and functions in melanoma and ovarian cancer. 1, 16030 (2016).Zhu H, et al. BET bromodomain inhibition promotes anti-tumor immunity by suppressing PD-L1 expression. Cell Rep 16:2829–2837, doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.08.032 (2016)Wu B, et al. Adipose PD-L1 modulates PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint blockade immunotherapy efficacy in breast cancer. Oncoimmunology 7:e1500107, doi:10.1080/2162402X.2018.1500107 (2018)Liang J, et al. Verteporfin inhibits PD-L1 through autophagy and the STAT1-IRF1-TRIM28 signaling axis, exerting antitumor efficacy. Cancer Immunol Res 8:952–965, doi:10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-19-0159 (2020)
Collapse
|
8
|
Kornepati AV, Deng Y, Dray E, Murray C, Kari SC, Osta E, Liu Z, Boyd J, Padron A, Reyes R, Gupta HB, Clark CA, Li R, Zhao W, Vadlamudi R, Sung P, Curiel TJ. Intracellular PD-L1 regulates DNA damage checkpoints and suppresses Chk1 and PARP inhibitor synthetic lethality. The Journal of Immunology 2021. [DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.206.supp.67.15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Tumor PD-L1 mediates non-canonical, intracellular signals including the DNA damage response (DDR), of unclear significance and mechanisms. We show that genetic PD-L1 depletion (PD-L1KO) destabilized the Chk2 protein, a DNA damage response (DDR) factor, resulting in ATM/Chk2 pathway defects but not ATR/Chk1 in melanoma, bladder, breast, and ovarian cancer. Consistent with ATM/Chk2 defects, PD-L1 KO led to DNA damage (γH2AX) and impaired homologous recombination (HR) (p-RPA32, BRCA1, Rad51 foci). Thus, PD-L1 KO vs control cells were significantly more sensitive to DDR inhibitors (DDRi) against ATR, Chk1, and PARP in vitro and in vivo in NSG mice. Chk2 regulation by PD-L1 was independent of PD-L1 cytoplasmic tail yet required intracellular (vs surface) PD-L1 suggesting physical PD-L1/Chk2 interaction supported by IP and imaging. PD-L1 stabilized Chk2 protein by preventing its lysosomal degradation without altering Chek2 mRNA. αPD-L1 is thought to work by protecting PD-L1 induced anti-tumor T cell suppression via PD-1, but PD-L1 DDR effects were PD-1-independent. Intracellular PD-L1 suppressed DDRi induced cGAS/STING activation by immunoblots and qRT-PCR of type 1 IFN genes. In vivo in WT mice, genetic PD-L1 depletion but not αPD-L1, sensitized highly immunotherapy resistant 4T1 breast cancer to PARPi. Strikingly, PARPi had reduced effect on PD-L1KO tumors in RAG2KO mice despite treating WT mice, indicating a strong immune component to DDRi efficacy. Our work implicates a novel role of intracellular PD-L1 in DDR and tumor immunogenicity and identifies related therapeutic vulnerabilities exposed by intracellular PD-L1 targeting. Surface vs intracellular PD-L1, and specific DDR signals could be treatment response biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yilun Deng
- 1University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio
| | - Eloise Dray
- 1University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio
| | - Clare Murray
- 1University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio
| | - Suresh C Kari
- 1University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio
| | - Erica Osta
- 1University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio
| | - Zexuan Liu
- 1University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio
| | - Jacob Boyd
- 1University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio
| | - Alvaro Padron
- 1University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio
| | - Ryan Reyes
- 1University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio
| | | | | | | | - Weixing Zhao
- 1University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio
| | | | - Patrick Sung
- 1University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dreyer SB, Upstill-Goddard R, Paulus-Hock V, Paris C, Lampraki EM, Dray E, Serrels B, Caligiuri G, Rebus S, Plenker D, Galluzzo Z, Brunton H, Cunningham R, Tesson M, Nourse C, Bailey UM, Jones M, Moran-Jones K, Wright DW, Duthie F, Oien K, Evers L, McKay CJ, McGregor GA, Gulati A, Brough R, Bajrami I, Pettitt S, Dziubinski ML, Candido J, Balkwill F, Barry ST, Grützmann R, Rahib L, Johns A, Pajic M, Froeling FEM, Beer P, Musgrove EA, Petersen GM, Ashworth A, Frame MC, Crawford HC, Simeone DM, Lord C, Mukhopadhyay D, Pilarsky C, Tuveson DA, Cooke SL, Jamieson NB, Morton JP, Sansom OJ, Bailey PJ, Biankin AV, Chang DK. Targeting DNA Damage Response and Replication Stress in Pancreatic Cancer. Gastroenterology 2021; 160:362-377.e13. [PMID: 33039466 PMCID: PMC8167930 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.09.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2019] [Revised: 09/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Continuing recalcitrance to therapy cements pancreatic cancer (PC) as the most lethal malignancy, which is set to become the second leading cause of cancer death in our society. The study aim was to investigate the association between DNA damage response (DDR), replication stress, and novel therapeutic response in PC to develop a biomarker-driven therapeutic strategy targeting DDR and replication stress in PC. METHODS We interrogated the transcriptome, genome, proteome, and functional characteristics of 61 novel PC patient-derived cell lines to define novel therapeutic strategies targeting DDR and replication stress. Validation was done in patient-derived xenografts and human PC organoids. RESULTS Patient-derived cell lines faithfully recapitulate the epithelial component of pancreatic tumors, including previously described molecular subtypes. Biomarkers of DDR deficiency, including a novel signature of homologous recombination deficiency, cosegregates with response to platinum (P < .001) and PARP inhibitor therapy (P < .001) in vitro and in vivo. We generated a novel signature of replication stress that predicts response to ATR (P < .018) and WEE1 inhibitor (P < .029) treatment in both cell lines and human PC organoids. Replication stress was enriched in the squamous subtype of PC (P < .001) but was not associated with DDR deficiency. CONCLUSIONS Replication stress and DDR deficiency are independent of each other, creating opportunities for therapy in DDR-proficient PC and after platinum therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan B Dreyer
- Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom; West of Scotland Pancreatic Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Rosie Upstill-Goddard
- Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | | | - Clara Paris
- Department of Pharmacological Faculty, Université Grenoble Alpes, Saint-Martin-d'Heres, France
| | - Eirini-Maria Lampraki
- Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Eloise Dray
- Department of Biochemistry and Structural Biology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
| | - Bryan Serrels
- Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom; Medical Research Council Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Edinburgh Cancer Research UK Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Giuseppina Caligiuri
- Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Selma Rebus
- Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Dennis Plenker
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York; Lustgarten Foundation Pancreatic Cancer Research Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York
| | - Zachary Galluzzo
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York; Lustgarten Foundation Pancreatic Cancer Research Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York
| | - Holly Brunton
- Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Cunningham
- Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Mathias Tesson
- Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Craig Nourse
- Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Ulla-Maja Bailey
- Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Marc Jones
- Stratified Medicine Scotland, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Kim Moran-Jones
- College of Medicine, Veterinary, and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Derek W Wright
- Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Fraser Duthie
- Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom; Department of Pathology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Karin Oien
- Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom; Department of Pathology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Greater Glasgow and Clyde Bio-repository, Pathology Department, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Lisa Evers
- Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Colin J McKay
- Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom; West of Scotland Pancreatic Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | | | - Aditi Gulati
- Cancer Research UK Gene Function Laboratory and Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Brough
- Cancer Research UK Gene Function Laboratory and Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ilirjana Bajrami
- Cancer Research UK Gene Function Laboratory and Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Stephan Pettitt
- Cancer Research UK Gene Function Laboratory and Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michele L Dziubinski
- Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Juliana Candido
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Frances Balkwill
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Simon T Barry
- Bioscience, Oncology, Innovative Medicines and Early Development Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Robert Grützmann
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Lola Rahib
- Pancreatic Cancer Action Network, Manhattan Beach, California
| | - Amber Johns
- The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst and Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
| | - Marina Pajic
- The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst and Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
| | - Fieke E M Froeling
- Lustgarten Foundation Pancreatic Cancer Research Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York; Epigenetics Unit, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, United Kingdom
| | - Phillip Beer
- Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Elizabeth A Musgrove
- Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | | | - Alan Ashworth
- Department of Pathology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of California-San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Margaret C Frame
- Medical Research Council Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Edinburgh Cancer Research UK Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Howard C Crawford
- Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Diane M Simeone
- Pancreatic Cancer Center, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York
| | - Chris Lord
- Cancer Research UK Gene Function Laboratory and Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Debabrata Mukhopadhyay
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Jacksonville, Florida
| | | | - David A Tuveson
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York; Lustgarten Foundation Pancreatic Cancer Research Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York
| | - Susanna L Cooke
- Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Nigel B Jamieson
- Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom; West of Scotland Pancreatic Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Jennifer P Morton
- Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Owen J Sansom
- Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom; Department of Biochemistry and Structural Biology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
| | - Peter J Bailey
- Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew V Biankin
- Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom; West of Scotland Pancreatic Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, United Kingdom; South Western Sydney Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, Australia.
| | - David K Chang
- Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom; West of Scotland Pancreatic Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, United Kingdom; South Western Sydney Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yang RM, Nanayakkara D, Kalimutho M, Mitra P, Khanna KK, Dray E, Gonda TJ. MYB regulates the DNA damage response and components of the homology-directed repair pathway in human estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cells. Oncogene 2019; 38:5239-5249. [PMID: 30971760 DOI: 10.1038/s41388-019-0789-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2018] [Revised: 02/20/2019] [Accepted: 03/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Over 70% of human breast cancers are estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), most of which express MYB. In these and other cell types, the MYB transcription factor regulates the expression of many genes involved in cell proliferation, differentiation, tumorigenesis, and apoptosis. So far, no clear link has been established between MYB and the DNA damage response in breast cancer. Here, we found that silencing MYB in the ER+ breast cancer cell line MCF-7 led to increased DNA damage accumulation, as marked by increased γ-H2AX foci following induction of double-stranded breaks. We further found that this was likely mediated by decreased homologous recombination-mediated repair (HRR), since silencing MYB impaired the formation of RAD51 foci in response to DNA damage. Moreover, cells depleted for MYB exhibited reduced expression of several key genes involved in HRR including BRCA1, PALB2, and TOPBP1. Taken together, these data imply that MYB and its targets play an important role in the response of ER+ breast cancer cells to DNA damage, and suggest that induction of DNA damage along with inhibition of MYB activity could offer therapeutic benefits for ER+ breast cancer and possibly other cancer types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ren-Ming Yang
- School of Pharmacy, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4102, Australia.,Keck School of Medicine at the Children's Hospital Los Angeles Campus, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90027, USA
| | - Devathri Nanayakkara
- Signal Transduction Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia
| | - Murugan Kalimutho
- Signal Transduction Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia
| | - Partha Mitra
- School of Pharmacy, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4102, Australia.,Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, TRI, 37 Kent Street, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia
| | - Kum Kum Khanna
- Signal Transduction Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia
| | - Eloise Dray
- Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovations, QUT at the Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, 4102, Australia. .,Mater Research/UQ at the Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, 4102, Australia. .,University of Texas Health, San Antonio, Department of Biochemistry and Structural Biology, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX, 78229-3900, USA.
| | - Thomas J Gonda
- School of Pharmacy, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4102, Australia. .,University of South Australia Cancer Research Institute, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lin CY, Hazar-Rethinam M, Thangavelu P, Dray E, Duijf PH. Abstract P1-04-02: Not presented. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p1-04-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
This abstract was not presented at the conference.
Citation Format: Lin C-Y, Hazar-Rethinam M, Thangavelu P, Dray E, Duijf PH. Not presented [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-04-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C-Y Lin
- The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - M Hazar-Rethinam
- The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - P Thangavelu
- The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - E Dray
- The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - PH Duijf
- The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lin C, Hazar-Rethinam M, Thangavelu P, Dray E, Duijf P. PO-224 consequences of FOXP1-mediated transcriptional repression of the mitotic checkpoint gene MAD2 in breast cancer. ESMO Open 2018. [DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2018-eacr25.742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
|
13
|
Thangavelu P, Reid L, Lim M, Molaei M, Reed AM, Saunus J, Dray E, Simpson P, Lakhani S, Duijf P. PO-321 Causes and consequences of WDHD1 overexpression in breast cancer. ESMO Open 2018. [DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2018-eacr25.351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
|
14
|
Lin CY, Shukla A, Grady JP, Fink JL, Dray E, Duijf PHG. Translocation Breakpoints Preferentially Occur in Euchromatin and Acrocentric Chromosomes. Cancers (Basel) 2018; 10:cancers10010013. [PMID: 29316705 PMCID: PMC5789363 DOI: 10.3390/cancers10010013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2017] [Revised: 12/11/2017] [Accepted: 01/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Chromosomal translocations drive the development of many hematological and some solid cancers. Several factors have been identified to explain the non-random occurrence of translocation breakpoints in the genome. These include chromatin density, gene density and CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF)/cohesin binding site density. However, such factors are at least partially interdependent. Using 13,844 and 1563 karyotypes from human blood and solid cancers, respectively, our multiple regression analysis only identified chromatin density as the primary statistically significant predictor. Specifically, translocation breakpoints preferentially occur in open chromatin. Also, blood and solid tumors show markedly distinct translocation signatures. Strikingly, translocation breakpoints occur significantly more frequently in acrocentric chromosomes than in non-acrocentric chromosomes. Thus, translocations are probably often generated around nucleoli in the inner nucleoplasm, away from the nuclear envelope. Importantly, our findings remain true both in multivariate analyses and after removal of highly recurrent translocations. Finally, we applied pairwise probabilistic co-occurrence modeling. In addition to well-known highly prevalent translocations, such as those resulting in BCR-ABL1 (BCR-ABL) and RUNX1-RUNX1T1 (AML1-ETO) fusion genes, we identified significantly underrepresented translocations with putative fusion genes, which are probably subject to strong negative selection during tumor evolution. Taken together, our findings provide novel insights into the generation and selection of translocations during cancer development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng-Yu Lin
- University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Translational Research Institute, 37 Kent Street, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia.
| | - Ankit Shukla
- University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Translational Research Institute, 37 Kent Street, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia.
| | - John P Grady
- University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Translational Research Institute, 37 Kent Street, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia.
| | - J Lynn Fink
- University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Translational Research Institute, 37 Kent Street, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia.
| | - Eloise Dray
- Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Translational Research Institute, 37 Kent Street, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia.
- Mater Research Institute-The University of Queensland, Translational Research Institute, 37 Kent Street, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia.
| | - Pascal H G Duijf
- University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Translational Research Institute, 37 Kent Street, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Betts JA, Moradi Marjaneh M, Al-Ejeh F, Lim YC, Shi W, Sivakumaran H, Tropée R, Patch AM, Clark MB, Bartonicek N, Wiegmans AP, Hillman KM, Kaufmann S, Bain AL, Gloss BS, Crawford J, Kazakoff S, Wani S, Wen SW, Day B, Möller A, Cloonan N, Pearson J, Brown MA, Mercer TR, Waddell N, Khanna KK, Dray E, Dinger ME, Edwards SL, French JD. Long Noncoding RNAs CUPID1 and CUPID2 Mediate Breast Cancer Risk at 11q13 by Modulating the Response to DNA Damage. Am J Hum Genet 2017; 101:255-266. [PMID: 28777932 PMCID: PMC5544418 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2017] [Accepted: 07/10/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer risk is strongly associated with an intergenic region on 11q13. We have previously shown that the strongest risk-associated SNPs fall within a distal enhancer that regulates CCND1. Here, we report that, in addition to regulating CCND1, this enhancer regulates two estrogen-regulated long noncoding RNAs, CUPID1 and CUPID2. We provide evidence that the risk-associated SNPs are associated with reduced chromatin looping between the enhancer and the CUPID1 and CUPID2 bidirectional promoter. We further show that CUPID1 and CUPID2 are predominantly expressed in hormone-receptor-positive breast tumors and play a role in modulating pathway choice for the repair of double-strand breaks. These data reveal a mechanism for the involvement of this region in breast cancer.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Breast Neoplasms/genetics
- Cell Line, Tumor
- Chromatin/metabolism
- Chromosomes, Human, Pair 11/genetics
- Cyclin D1/genetics
- DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded
- DNA Damage/genetics
- DNA Repair/genetics
- Enhancer Elements, Genetic/genetics
- Estrogens/metabolism
- Female
- Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic
- Genetic Predisposition to Disease/genetics
- Humans
- MCF-7 Cells
- Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide/genetics
- Promoter Regions, Genetic/genetics
- RNA Interference
- RNA, Long Noncoding/genetics
- RNA, Small Interfering/genetics
- RNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua A Betts
- Cancer Division, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia; School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
| | - Mahdi Moradi Marjaneh
- Cancer Division, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
| | - Fares Al-Ejeh
- Cancer Division, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
| | - Yi Chieh Lim
- Cancer Division, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
| | - Wei Shi
- Cancer Division, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
| | - Haran Sivakumaran
- Cancer Division, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
| | - Romain Tropée
- Queensland University of Technology at the Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia
| | - Ann-Marie Patch
- Cancer Division, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
| | - Michael B Clark
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK; Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia
| | - Nenad Bartonicek
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia; St. Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Adrian P Wiegmans
- Cancer Division, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
| | - Kristine M Hillman
- Cancer Division, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
| | - Susanne Kaufmann
- Cancer Division, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
| | - Amanda L Bain
- Cancer Division, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
| | - Brian S Gloss
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia; St. Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Joanna Crawford
- Institute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
| | - Stephen Kazakoff
- Cancer Division, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
| | - Shivangi Wani
- Cancer Division, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
| | - Shu W Wen
- Cancer Division, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
| | - Bryan Day
- Cancer Division, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
| | - Andreas Möller
- Cancer Division, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
| | - Nicole Cloonan
- Cancer Division, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
| | - John Pearson
- Cancer Division, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
| | - Melissa A Brown
- School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
| | - Timothy R Mercer
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia; St. Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Nicola Waddell
- Cancer Division, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
| | - Kum Kum Khanna
- Cancer Division, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
| | - Eloise Dray
- Queensland University of Technology at the Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia; Queensland University of Technology, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Brisbane, QLD 4059, Australia
| | - Marcel E Dinger
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia; St. Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Stacey L Edwards
- Cancer Division, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia.
| | - Juliet D French
- Cancer Division, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Thangavelu PU, Lin CY, Vaidyanathan S, Nguyen THM, Dray E, Duijf PHG. Overexpression of the E2F target gene CENPI promotes chromosome instability and predicts poor prognosis in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Oncotarget 2017; 8:62167-62182. [PMID: 28977935 PMCID: PMC5617495 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.19131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2016] [Accepted: 06/03/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
During cell division, chromosome segregation is facilitated by the mitotic checkpoint, or spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), which ensures correct kinetochore-microtubule attachments and prevents premature sister-chromatid separation. It is well established that misexpression of SAC components on the outer kinetochores promotes chromosome instability (CIN) and tumorigenesis. Here, we study the expression of CENP-I, a key component of the HIKM complex at the inner kinetochores, in breast cancer, including ductal, lobular, medullary and male breast carcinomas. CENPI mRNA and protein levels are significantly elevated in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) but not in estrogen receptor-negative (ER-) breast carcinoma. Well-established prognostic tests indicate that CENPI overexpression constitutes a powerful independent marker for poor patient prognosis and survival in ER+ breast cancer. We further demonstrate that CENPI is an E2F target gene. Consistently, it is overexpressed in RB1-deficient breast cancers. However, CENP-I overexpression is not purely due to cell cycle-associated expression. In ER+ breast cancer cells, CENP-I overexpression promotes CIN, especially chromosome gains. In addition, in ER+ breast carcinomas the degree of CENPI overexpression is proportional to the level of aneuploidy and CENPI overexpression is one of the strongest markers for CIN identified to date. Our results indicate that overexpression of the inner kinetochore protein CENP-I promotes CIN and forecasts poor prognosis for ER+ breast cancer patients. These observations provide novel mechanistic insights and have important implications for breast cancer diagnostics and potentially therapeutic targeting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pulari U Thangavelu
- University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Cheng-Yu Lin
- University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Srividya Vaidyanathan
- University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Thu H M Nguyen
- University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Eloise Dray
- Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Pascal H G Duijf
- University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Yin K, Chhabra Y, Tropée R, Lim YC, Fane M, Dray E, Sturm RA, Smith AG. NR4A2 Promotes DNA Double-strand Break Repair Upon Exposure to UVR. Mol Cancer Res 2017; 15:1184-1196. [PMID: 28607006 DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-17-0002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2017] [Revised: 04/07/2017] [Accepted: 06/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Exposure of melanocytes to ultraviolet radiation (UVR) induces the formation of UV lesions that can produce deleterious effects in genomic DNA. Encounters of replication forks with unrepaired UV lesions can lead to several complex phenomena, such as the formation of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). The NR4A family of nuclear receptors are transcription factors that have been associated with mediating DNA repair functions downstream of the MC1R signaling pathway in melanocytes. In particular, emerging evidence shows that upon DNA damage, the NR4A2 receptor can translocate to sites of UV lesion by mechanisms requiring post-translational modifications within the N-terminal domain and at a serine residue in the DNA-binding domain at position 337. Following this, NR4A2 aids in DNA repair by facilitating chromatin relaxation, allowing accessibility for DNA repair machinery. Using A2058 and HT144 melanoma cells engineered to stably express wild-type or mutant forms of the NR4A2 proteins, we reveal that the expression of functional NR4A2 is associated with elevated cytoprotection against UVR. Conversely, knockdown of NR4A2 expression by siRNA results in a significant loss of cell viability after UV insult. By analyzing the kinetics of the ensuing 53BP1 and RAD51 foci following UV irradiation, we also reveal that the expression of mutant NR4A2 isoforms, lacking the ability to translocate, transactivate, or undergo phosphorylation, display compromised repair capacity.Implications: These data expand the understanding of the mechanism by which the NR4A2 nuclear receptor can facilitate DNA DSB repair. Mol Cancer Res; 15(9); 1184-96. ©2017 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelvin Yin
- School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Yash Chhabra
- Queensland University of Technology, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland-Diamantina Institute, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Romain Tropée
- Queensland University of Technology, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Yi Chieh Lim
- Translational Brain Cancer Research, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Mitchell Fane
- School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Eloise Dray
- Queensland University of Technology, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Queensland University of Technology, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.,Mater Research - The University of Queensland, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Richard A Sturm
- Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland-Diamantina Institute, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Aaron G Smith
- Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland-Diamantina Institute, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. .,Queensland University of Technology, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Dray E, Mueller ER. Use of Urodynamic Studies among Certifying and Recertifying Urologists from 2003 to 2014. Urol Pract 2017; 4:251-256. [PMID: 37592629 DOI: 10.1016/j.urpr.2016.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Guidelines for the use of urodynamics have undergone a significant narrowing of scope in recent years, particularly as they pertain to the use of urodynamics for stress incontinence in women. Whether these changes have affected the use of urodynamics in practice is unknown. The goal of this study is to quantify the percentage of urologists who are performing urodynamics, to determine how trends have changed during the time studied and to better understand why these studies are being performed by identifying the associated diagnosis codes. METHODS We queried the 6-month procedure logs submitted by applicants for part II ABU (American Board of Urology) certification or recertification between 2003 and 2014. The number of procedures with urodynamics CPT codes were abstracted (51725, 51726, 51772, 51784, 51785, 51792, 51795, 5179, 51797) along with the certification year, patient gender and ICD-9 diagnosis used for each procedure. RESULTS During the 11-year period of data 7,849 practice logs were submitted to the ABU. Overall 91% of certifying applicants and 89.5% of recertifying applicants performed urodynamics. This number increased from 82.6% of certifying urologists and 70.3% of recertifying urologists in 2003 to 94.7% of recertifying urologists and 93.7% of certifying urologists in 2014. In 2003, on average, each certifying applicant performed 99 urodynamics procedures. This number increased to 149 procedures per applicant in 2014, for a 49.8% increase overall from the start of the study period. For recertification candidates an average of 125 procedures was performed per candidate in 2003. The average increased to 187 procedures per candidate in 2014 for a 49.5% increase in procedures performed. Videourodynamics were performed by 8.1% of certification or recertification applicants overall. This increased from 1% of recertification applicants and 1.8% of certification applicants in 2003 to 6% and 12.5% of recertification and certification applicants, respectively, in 2013. The ICD-9 codes most frequently associated with pressure flow studies were 625.6 (stress urinary incontinence-female) and 788.41 (urinary frequency). The ICD-9 code most commonly associated with videourodynamics across our study was 625.6 (stress urinary incontinence-female). CONCLUSIONS Since 2003 the percentage of applicants for ABU certification or recertification using urodynamics in their practice has increased from 76.5% to 94.2%. There has also been a 49.7% increase in the number of urodynamics procedures performed per candidate during that period, indicating an overall increase in the use of urodynamic studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Dray
- Department of Urology, Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois
| | - E R Mueller
- Department of Urology, Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Thangavelu PU, Krenács T, Dray E, Duijf PHG. In epithelial cancers, aberrant COL17A1 promoter methylation predicts its misexpression and increased invasion. Clin Epigenetics 2016; 8:120. [PMID: 27891193 PMCID: PMC5116176 DOI: 10.1186/s13148-016-0290-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2016] [Accepted: 11/10/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metastasis is a leading cause of death among cancer patients. In the tumor microenvironment, altered levels of extracellular matrix proteins, such as collagens, can facilitate the first steps of cancer cell metastasis, including invasion into surrounding tissue and intravasation into the blood stream. However, the degree of misexpression of collagen genes in tumors remains understudied, even though this knowledge could greatly facilitate the development of cancer treatment options aimed at preventing metastasis. METHODS We systematically evaluate the expression of all 44 collagen genes in breast cancer and assess whether their misexpression provides clinical prognostic significance. We use immunohistochemistry on 150 ductal breast cancers and 361 cervical cancers and study DNA methylation in various epithelial cancers. RESULTS In breast cancer, various tests show that COL4A1 and COL4A2 overexpression and COL17A1 (BP180, BPAG2) underexpression provide independent prognostic strength (HR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.17-1.34, p = 3.03 × 10-10; HR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.11-1.25, p = 8.11 × 10-10; HR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.81-0.92, p = 4.57 × 10-6; respectively). Immunohistochemistry on ductal breast cancers confirmed that the COL17A1 protein product, collagen XVII, is underexpressed. This strongly correlates with advanced stage, increased invasion, and postmenopausal status. In contrast, immunohistochemistry on cervical tumors showed that collagen XVII is overexpressed in cervical cancer and this is associated with increased local dissemination. Interestingly, consistent with the opposed direction of misexpression in these cancers, the COL17A1 promoter is hypermethylated in breast cancer and hypomethylated in cervical cancer. We also find that the COL17A1 promoter is hypomethylated in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, lung squamous cell carcinoma, and lung adenocarcinoma, in all of which collagen XVII overexpression has previously been shown. CONCLUSIONS Paradoxically, collagen XVII is underexpressed in breast cancer and overexpressed in cervical and other epithelial cancers. However, the COL17A1 promoter methylation status accurately predicts both the direction of misexpression and the increased invasive nature for five out of five epithelial cancers. This implies that aberrant epigenetic control is a key driver of COL17A1 gene misexpression and tumor cell invasion. These findings have significant clinical implications, suggesting that the COL17A1 promoter methylation status can be used to predict patient outcome. Moreover, epigenetic targeting of COL17A1 could represent a novel strategy to prevent metastasis in patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pulari U. Thangavelu
- University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Translational Research Institute, 37 Kent Street, Brisbane, QLD 4102 Australia
| | - Tibor Krenács
- 1st Department of Pathology and Experimental Cancer Research, Semmelweis University and MTA-SE Cancer Progression Research Group, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Eloise Dray
- Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4102 Australia
| | - Pascal H. G. Duijf
- University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Translational Research Institute, 37 Kent Street, Brisbane, QLD 4102 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Milevskiy MJ, Al-Ejeh F, Saunus JM, Northwood KS, McCart-Reed AE, Dray E, Nephew K, Bailey PJ, Betts JA, Stone A, Gee JMW, Shewan AM, French JD, Edwards SL, Clark SJ, Lakhani SR, Brown MA. Abstract 1980: Long-range regulation of HOTAIR identifies novel biomarkers of breast cancer outcome and suggests a role in genome instability. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2016-1980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Long-range regulators of gene expression are emerging as promising new biomarkers and therapeutic targets for human diseases including cancer. As current breast cancer biomarkers have limited power for predicting disease progression and response to therapy, we have explored the potential of long-range regulators of non-coding RNAs to be useful in the prognostication of breast cancer. HOTAIR is a long non-coding RNA that is overexpressed, promotes metastasis, and is predictive of poor prognosis in breast cancer. Here we describe a long-range transcriptional enhancer of the HOTAIR gene that binds several hormone receptors and associated transcription factors, interacts with the HOTAIR promoter and augments HOTAIR transcription. This enhancer is dependent on FOXA1 and FOXM1 transcription factors and functionally interacts with a novel alternate HOTAIR promoter. Analysis of breast cancer gene expression data indicates that HOTAIR is co-expressed with FOXA1 and FOXM1 in HER2-enriched tumours, and these factors enhance the prognostic power of HOTAIR in this subtype of breast cancer. The combination of HOTAIR and FOXM1 also enables better predictions of response to endocrine therapy for ER+ breast cancer. FOXM1 is a member of the recently described chromosome instability module and consistent with this, the expression of HOTAIR and FOXM1 is associated with increased frequency of copy number alterations and somatic non-synonymous mutations. Our study corroborates the importance of enhancers in breast cancer, elucidates the transcriptional regulation of HOTAIR, suggests HOTAIR as a novel biomarker of patient response to endocrine therapy, and implicates HOTAIR in chromosome instability.
Citation Format: Michael J. Milevskiy, Fares Al-Ejeh, Jodi M. Saunus, Korinne S. Northwood, Amy E. McCart-Reed, Eloise Dray, Kenneth Nephew, Peter J. Bailey, Joshua A. Betts, Andrew Stone, Julia M W Gee, Annette M. Shewan, Juliet D. French, Stacey L. Edwards, Susan J. Clark, Sunil R. Lakhani, Melissa A. Brown. Long-range regulation of HOTAIR identifies novel biomarkers of breast cancer outcome and suggests a role in genome instability. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 1980.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fares Al-Ejeh
- 2Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Eloise Dray
- 3Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | | | | | - Joshua A. Betts
- 2Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Andrew Stone
- 5Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | - Susan J. Clark
- 5Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Milevskiy MJG, Al-Ejeh F, Saunus JM, Northwood KS, Bailey PJ, Betts JA, McCart Reed AE, Nephew KP, Stone A, Gee JMW, Dowhan DH, Dray E, Shewan AM, French JD, Edwards SL, Clark SJ, Lakhani SR, Brown MA. Long-range regulators of the lncRNA HOTAIR enhance its prognostic potential in breast cancer. Hum Mol Genet 2016; 25:3269-3283. [PMID: 27378691 PMCID: PMC5179926 DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddw177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2016] [Revised: 06/05/2016] [Accepted: 06/07/2016] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Predicting response to endocrine therapy and survival in oestrogen receptor positive breast cancer is a significant clinical challenge and novel prognostic biomarkers are needed. Long-range regulators of gene expression are emerging as promising biomarkers and therapeutic targets for human diseases, so we have explored the potential of distal enhancer elements of non-coding RNAs in the prognostication of breast cancer survival. HOTAIR is a long non-coding RNA that is overexpressed, promotes metastasis and is predictive of decreased survival. Here, we describe a long-range transcriptional enhancer of the HOTAIR gene that binds several hormone receptors and associated transcription factors, interacts with the HOTAIR promoter and augments transcription. This enhancer is dependent on Forkhead-Box transcription factors and functionally interacts with a novel alternate HOTAIR promoter. HOTAIR expression is negatively regulated by oestrogen, positively regulated by FOXA1 and FOXM1, and is inversely correlated with oestrogen receptor and directly correlated with FOXM1 in breast tumours. The combination of HOTAIR and FOXM1 enables greater discrimination of endocrine therapy responders and non-responders in patients with oestrogen receptor positive breast cancer. Consistent with this, HOTAIR expression is increased in cell-line models of endocrine resistance. Analysis of breast cancer gene expression data indicates that HOTAIR is co-expressed with FOXA1 and FOXM1 in HER2-enriched tumours, and these factors enhance the prognostic power of HOTAIR in aggressive HER2+ breast tumours. Our study elucidates the transcriptional regulation of HOTAIR, identifies HOTAIR and its regulators as novel biomarkers of patient response to endocrine therapy and corroborates the importance of transcriptional enhancers in cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J G Milevskiy
- School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Fares Al-Ejeh
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Jodi M Saunus
- The University of Queensland, UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Herston, Australia
| | - Korinne S Northwood
- School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,The University of Queensland, UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Herston, Australia
| | - Peter J Bailey
- School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Joshua A Betts
- School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Amy E McCart Reed
- The University of Queensland, UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Herston, Australia
| | | | - Andrew Stone
- Epigenetics Research Laboratory, Division of Genomics and Epigenetics, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Julia M W Gee
- School of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Dennis H Dowhan
- Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Eloise Dray
- School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Annette M Shewan
- School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Juliet D French
- School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Stacey L Edwards
- School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Susan J Clark
- Epigenetics Research Laboratory, Division of Genomics and Epigenetics, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sunil R Lakhani
- The University of Queensland, UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Herston, Australia.,Pathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Herston, Australia.,The University of Queensland School of Medicine, Herston, Australia
| | - Melissa A Brown
- School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Yang RM, Dray E, Mitra P, Gonda TJ. Abstract P4-07-09: MYB is involved in the DNA damage response in human ER+ breast cancer cells. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-p4-07-09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Aims:
Over 70% of human breast cancer cells are oestrogen receptor positive (ER+) and express MYB. MYB expression is necessary for the proliferation of ER+ breast cancer cells in vitro and for tumour development in vivo. Our previous studies found that shRNA-mediated MYB knock-down greatly sensitised breast cancer cells to chemically-induced apoptosis by down-regulating the BCL2 (a MYB target gene) (Drabsch et al., 2010). Furthermore, several published studies (Taha et al., 2004; Thomadaki et al., 2006) indicated that actinomycin D and etoposide treatment could induce DNA damage in human ER+ breast cancer (MCF-7) cells. Moreover, silencing MYB increased DNA damage-induced cell death in castration resistant prostate cancer cells by down-regulating DNA damage response genes (Li et al., 2014). However, there is very little information on MYB function in the DNA damage response of ER+ breast cancer cells. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate whether silencing MYB affected the DNA damage repair and resulting in cell death in MCF-7 cells.
Methods:
To achieve down-regulation of MYB expression in human ER+ breast cancer, we used doxycycline inducible shRNA lentiviral vectors (pLV711 (Drabsch et al., 2007; Brown et al., 2010)) in human MCF-7 breast cancer cells. We used PI staining plus FACS analysis for cell death assessment. We also used γ-H2AX protein expression and γ-H2AX foci counting to assess DNA damage.
Results:
We found that silencing MYB alone did not result in cell death, as reported previously (Drabsch et al., 2010). However, silencing MYB significantly increased actinomycin D-induced cell death. This similar result was also found on etoposide-induced cell death. Furthermore, we found that silencing MYB significantly increased actinomycin D or etoposide-induced γ-H2AX expression. Moreover, anti-apoptotic BCL2 expression, measured by western blotting, was dramatically reduced after the combination of MYB knock down and actinomycin D or etoposide, compared to wild type and nonsilencing controls.
Conclusions:
Silencing MYB significantly increased DNA damage-induced cell death and D???damage. This may result from down-regulation of BCL2 expression, an effect on DNA damage response genes, or both. This requires further investigation. For example, Rad51 and γ-H2AX colocalization and 53BP1 expression in response to DNA damage will be presented.
References:
Taha et al., 2004, J Biol Chem, 279, 20546-46.
Thomadaki et al., 2006, Biol. Chem., 387, 1081-1086.
Drabsch et al., 2007, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 104, 13762-7.
Drabsch et al., 2010, Breast Cancer Res, 12:R55.
Brown et al., 2010, Hum Gene Ther, 21(8),1005-17.
Li et al., 2014, Science Signaling, 7(326).
Citation Format: Yang R-M, Dray E, Mitra P, Gonda TJ. MYB is involved in the DNA damage response in human ER+ breast cancer cells. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-07-09.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R-M Yang
- School of Pharmacy, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia; Translational Research Institute Australia, Brisbane, Australia
| | - E Dray
- School of Pharmacy, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia; Translational Research Institute Australia, Brisbane, Australia
| | - P Mitra
- School of Pharmacy, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia; Translational Research Institute Australia, Brisbane, Australia
| | - TJ Gonda
- School of Pharmacy, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia; Translational Research Institute Australia, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Oh TG, Bailey P, Dray E, Smith AG, Goode J, Eriksson N, Funder JW, Fuller PJ, Simpson ER, Tilley WD, Leedman PJ, Clarke CL, Grimmond S, Dowhan DH, Muscat GEO. PRMT2 and RORγ expression are associated with breast cancer survival outcomes. Mol Endocrinol 2014; 28:1166-85. [PMID: 24911119 DOI: 10.1210/me.2013-1403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs) methylate arginine residues on histones and target transcription factors that play critical roles in many cellular processes, including gene transcription, mRNA splicing, proliferation, and differentiation. Recent studies have linked PRMT-dependent epigenetic marks and modifications to carcinogenesis and metastasis in cancer. However, the role of PRMT2-dependent signaling in breast cancer remains obscure. We demonstrate PRMT2 mRNA expression was significantly decreased in breast cancer relative to normal breast. Gene expression profiling, Ingenuity and protein-protein interaction network analysis after PRMT2-short interfering RNA transfection into MCF-7 cells, revealed that PRMT2-dependent gene expression is involved in cell-cycle regulation and checkpoint control, chromosomal instability, DNA repair, and carcinogenesis. For example, PRMT2 depletion achieved the following: 1) increased p21 and decreased cyclinD1 expression in (several) breast cancer cell lines, 2) decreased cell migration, 3) induced an increase in nucleotide excision repair and homologous recombination DNA repair, and 4) increased the probability of distance metastasis free survival (DMFS). The expression of PRMT2 and retinoid-related orphan receptor-γ (RORγ) is inversely correlated in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer and increased RORγ expression increases DMFS. Furthermore, we found decreased expression of the PRMT2-dependent signature is significantly associated with increased probability of DMFS. Finally, weighted gene coexpression network analysis demonstrated a significant correlation between PRMT2-dependent genes and cell-cycle checkpoint, kinetochore, and DNA repair circuits. Strikingly, these PRMT2-dependent circuits are correlated with pan-cancer metagene signatures associated with epithelial-mesenchymal transition and chromosomal instability. This study demonstrates the role and significant correlation between a histone methyltransferase (PRMT2)-dependent signature, RORγ, the cell-cycle regulation, DNA repair circuits, and breast cancer survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tae Gyu Oh
- Institute for Molecular Bioscience (T.G.O., P.B., J.G., N.E., S.G., D.H.D., G.E.O.M.) and School of Biomedical Science (A.G.S.), The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation (E.D.), Queensland University of Technology, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland 4102, Australia; Prince Henry's Institute of Medical Research (J.W.F., P.J.F., E.R.S.), Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia; Dame Roma Mitchell Cancer Research Laboratory (W.D.T.), School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, South Australia, Australia; Western Australian Institute for Medical Research (P.J.L.), University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia; Westmead Millennium Institute (C.L.C.), Sydney Medical School, Westmead, University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia; and Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine/Wallenberg Laboratory (G.E.O.M.), University of Gothenburg, S-405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Hansen JE, Chan G, Liu Y, Hegan DC, Dalal S, Dray E, Kwon Y, Xu Y, Xu X, Peterson-Roth E, Geiger E, Liu Y, Gera J, Sweasy JB, Sung P, Rockwell S, Nishimura RN, Weisbart RH, Glazer PM. Targeting cancer with a lupus autoantibody. Sci Transl Med 2013; 4:157ra142. [PMID: 23100628 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3004385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is distinct among autoimmune diseases because of its association with circulating autoantibodies reactive against host DNA. The precise role that anti-DNA antibodies play in SLE pathophysiology remains to be elucidated, and potential applications of lupus autoantibodies in cancer therapy have not previously been explored. We report the unexpected finding that a cell-penetrating lupus autoantibody, 3E10, has potential as a targeted therapy for DNA repair-deficient malignancies. We find that 3E10 preferentially binds DNA single-strand tails, inhibits key steps in DNA single-strand and double-strand break repair, and sensitizes cultured tumor cells and human tumor xenografts to DNA-damaging therapy, including doxorubicin and radiation. Moreover, we demonstrate that 3E10 alone is synthetically lethal to BRCA2-deficient human cancer cells and selectively sensitizes such cells to low-dose doxorubicin. Our results establish an approach to cancer therapy that we expect will be particularly applicable to BRCA2-related malignancies such as breast, ovarian, and prostate cancers. In addition, our findings raise the possibility that lupus autoantibodies may be partly responsible for the intrinsic deficiencies in DNA repair and the unexpectedly low rates of breast, ovarian, and prostate cancers observed in SLE patients. In summary, this study provides the basis for the potential use of a lupus anti-DNA antibody in cancer therapy and identifies lupus autoantibodies as a potentially rich source of therapeutic agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James E Hansen
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Hansen JE, Chan G, Liu Y, Hegan DC, Dalal S, Dray E, Kwon Y, Xu Y, Xu X, Peterson-Roth E, Geiger E, Liu Y, Gera J, Sweasy JB, Sung P, Rockwell S, Nishimura RN, Weisbart RH, Glazer PM. Abstract 4319: Lupus antibody-based cancer therapy. Cancer Res 2013. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2013-4319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
A subset of autoantibodies produced by patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) penetrates into cell nuclei and binds DNA, and we believe that such antibodies may have applications in cancer therapy. We have discovered that the cell-penetrating, nuclear-localizing anti-DNA lupus antibody 3E10 inhibits key steps in DNA single- and double-strand break repair and has potential for development as a targeted therapy for tumors harboring deficiencies in DNA repair. 3E10 preferentially binds DNA substrates with free single-strand tails and interferes with both base excision repair and homology-directed repair (HDR) in vitro, and HDR efficiency is reduced in cells treated with 3E10 as measured in the chromosome-based DR-GFP fluorescent reporter assay. The binding of 3E10 to DNA can be directly visualized under electron microscopy (EM), and EM studies confirmed that 3E10 interferes with RAD51 filament formation, which is a critical step in HDR. The 3E10 single chain variable fragment penetrates into human tumor xenografts in nude mice, and 3E10 sensitizes cancer cells and tumors to DNA-damaging therapy. In addition, 3E10, by itself, is toxic to BRCA2-deficient cancer cells but not to repair-proficient cells, and when combined with a DNA-damaging agent, 3E10 has a very large cytotoxic effect on BRCA2-deficient cancer cells. The synthetically lethal effect of 3E10 on BRCA2-deficient cancer cells is consistent with our finding that 3E10 inhibits DNA repair, and it suggests that 3E10 has potential as a targeted therapy for tumors harboring deficiencies in DNA repair, such as certain breast, ovarian, and prostate cancers. Of note, patients with SLE have lower than expected incidence rates of breast, ovarian, and prostate cancers, and it is tempting to speculate that the circulating cell-penetrating anti-DNA autoantibodies provide patients with SLE some protection against the development of DNA repair-deficient tumors. In summary, our work with the 3E10 antibody has provided proof of principle for the development of a lupus antibody as a cancer therapy and opened up new avenues for exploration into the biology of lupus antibodies.
Citation Format: James E. Hansen, Grace Chan, Yanfeng Liu, Denise C. Hegan, Shibani Dalal, Eloise Dray, Youngho Kwon, Yuanyuan Xu, Xiaohua Xu, Elizabeth Peterson-Roth, Erik Geiger, Yilun Liu, Joseph Gera, Joann B. Sweasy, Patrick Sung, Sara Rockwell, Robert N. Nishimura, Richard H. Weisbart, Peter M. Glazer. Lupus antibody-based cancer therapy. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4319. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-4319
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Grace Chan
- 2Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Yilun Liu
- 3Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA
| | - Joseph Gera
- 2Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Islam MN, Paquet N, Fox D, Dray E, Zheng XF, Klein H, Sung P, Wang W. A variant of the breast cancer type 2 susceptibility protein (BRC) repeat is essential for the RECQL5 helicase to interact with RAD51 recombinase for genome stabilization. J Biol Chem 2012; 287:23808-18. [PMID: 22645136 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m112.375014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
The BRC repeat is a structural motif in the tumor suppressor BRCA2 (breast cancer type 2 susceptibility protein), which promotes homologous recombination (HR) by regulating RAD51 recombinase activity. To date, the BRC repeat has not been observed in other proteins, so that its role in HR is inferred only in the context of BRCA2. Here, we identified a BRC repeat variant, named BRCv, in the RECQL5 helicase, which possesses anti-recombinase activity in vitro and suppresses HR and promotes cellular resistance to camptothecin-induced replication stress in vivo. RECQL5-BRCv interacted with RAD51 through two conserved motifs similar to those in the BRCA2-BRC repeat. Mutations of either motif compromised functions of RECQL5, including association with RAD51, inhibition of RAD51-mediated D-loop formation, suppression of sister chromatid exchange, and resistance to camptothecin-induced replication stress. Potential BRCvs were also found in other HR regulatory proteins, including Srs2 and Sgs1, which possess anti-recombinase activities similar to that of RECQL5. A point mutation in the predicted Srs2-BRCv disrupted the ability of the protein to bind RAD51 and to inhibit D-loop formation. Thus, BRC is a common RAD51 interaction module that can be utilized by different proteins to either promote HR, as in the case of BRCA2, or to suppress HR, as in RECQL5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Nurul Islam
- Laboratory of Genetics, NIA, National Institutes of Health, National Institutes of Health Biomedical Research Center, Baltimore, Maryland 21224, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|