1
|
Scheltes DA, van der Steen-Banasik EM, Smits GA. Quality of life of muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients after brachytherapy-based treatment: A cross-sectional study. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2023; 15:110-116. [PMID: 37215614 PMCID: PMC10196731 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2023.127050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To determine the quality of life (QoL) of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) who underwent bladder-sparing treatment with high-dose-rate brachytherapy, and compare their QoL with an age-matched general Dutch population. Material and methods We conducted a single-center, prospective, descriptive cross-sectional study. MIBC patients who underwent brachytherapy-based bladder sparing treatment in Arnhem, The Netherlands from January 2016 to June 2021, were requested to complete the following questionnaires: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) generic (QLQ-C30), bladder cancer-specific (QLQ-BLM30), and expanded prostate cancer index composite bowel (EPIC-50). Mean scores were calculated and compared with general Dutch population. Results The mean global health status/QoL score of the treated patients was 80.6. High scores were noted in the functional scales, including physical (86.8), role (85.6), emotional (88.6), cognitive (88.3), and social functioning (88.9), while the main reported complains were related to fatigue (21.9) and urinary symptoms (25.1). Compared to the general Dutch population, significant differences were visible in global health status/QoL (80.6 vs. 75.7), pain (9.0 vs. 17.8), insomnia (23.3 vs. 15.2), and constipation (13.3 vs. 6.8). However, in no case did the mean score differ by more than ten points, which was considered clinically relevant. Conclusions With a mean global health status/QoL score of 80.6, the patients after brachytherapy-based bladder sparing treatment have a good QoL. We found no clinically relevant difference in QoL comparing with an age-matched general Dutch population. The outcome strengthens the idea that this treatment option should be discussed with all patients eligible for brachytherapy-based treatment.
Collapse
|
2
|
Fremond S, Andani S, Barkey Wolf J, Dijkstra J, Melsbach S, Jobsen JJ, Brinkhuis M, Roothaan S, Jurgenliemk-Schulz I, Lutgens LCHW, Nout RA, van der Steen-Banasik EM, de Boer SM, Powell ME, Singh N, Mileshkin LR, Mackay HJ, Leary A, Nijman HW, Smit VTHBM, Creutzberg CL, Horeweg N, Koelzer VH, Bosse T. Interpretable deep learning model to predict the molecular classification of endometrial cancer from haematoxylin and eosin-stained whole-slide images: a combined analysis of the PORTEC randomised trials and clinical cohorts. Lancet Digit Health 2023; 5:e71-e82. [PMID: 36496303 DOI: 10.1016/s2589-7500(22)00210-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Revised: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endometrial cancer can be molecularly classified into POLEmut, mismatch repair deficient (MMRd), p53 abnormal (p53abn), and no specific molecular profile (NSMP) subgroups. We aimed to develop an interpretable deep learning pipeline for whole-slide-image-based prediction of the four molecular classes in endometrial cancer (im4MEC), to identify morpho-molecular correlates, and to refine prognostication. METHODS This combined analysis included diagnostic haematoxylin and eosin-stained slides and molecular and clinicopathological data from 2028 patients with intermediate-to-high-risk endometrial cancer from the PORTEC-1 (n=466), PORTEC-2 (n=375), and PORTEC-3 (n=393) randomised trials and the TransPORTEC pilot study (n=110), the Medisch Spectrum Twente cohort (n=242), a case series of patients with POLEmut endometrial cancer in the Leiden Endometrial Cancer Repository (n=47), and The Cancer Genome Atlas-Uterine Corpus Endometrial Carcinoma cohort (n=395). PORTEC-3 was held out as an independent test set and a four-fold cross validation was performed. Performance was measured with the macro and class-wise area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Whole-slide images were segmented into tiles of 360 μm resized to 224 × 224 pixels. im4MEC was trained to learn tile-level morphological features with self-supervised learning and to molecularly classify whole-slide images with an attention mechanism. The top 20 tiles with the highest attention scores were reviewed to identify morpho-molecular correlates. Predictions of a nuclear classification deep learning model serve to derive interpretable morphological features. We analysed 5-year recurrence-free survival and explored prognostic refinement by molecular class using the Kaplan-Meier method. FINDINGS im4MEC attained macro-average AUROCs of 0·874 (95% CI 0·856-0·893) on four-fold cross-validation and 0·876 on the independent test set. The class-wise AUROCs were 0·849 for POLEmut (n=51), 0·844 for MMRd (n=134), 0·883 for NSMP (n=120), and 0·928 for p53abn (n=88). POLEmut and MMRd tiles had a high density of lymphocytes, p53abn tiles had strong nuclear atypia, and the morphology of POLEmut and MMRd endometrial cancer overlapped. im4MEC highlighted a low tumour-to-stroma ratio as a potentially novel characteristic feature of the NSMP class. 5-year recurrence-free survival was significantly different between im4MEC predicted molecular classes in PORTEC-3 (log-rank p<0·0001). The ten patients with aggressive p53abn endometrial cancer that was predicted as MMRd showed inflammatory morphology and appeared to have a better prognosis than patients with correctly predicted p53abn endometrial cancer (p=0·30). The four patients with NSMP endometrial cancer that was predicted as p53abn showed higher nuclear atypia and appeared to have a worse prognosis than patients with correctly predicted NSMP (p=0·13). Patients with MMRd endometrial cancer predicted as POLEmut had an excellent prognosis, as do those with true POLEmut endometrial cancer. INTERPRETATION We present the first interpretable deep learning model, im4MEC, for haematoxylin and eosin-based prediction of molecular endometrial cancer classification. im4MEC robustly identified morpho-molecular correlates and could enable further prognostic refinement of patients with endometrial cancer. FUNDING The Hanarth Foundation, the Promedica Foundation, and the Swiss Federal Institutes of Technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Fremond
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Sonali Andani
- Department of Computer Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Jouke Dijkstra
- Department of Vascular and Molecular Imaging, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Sinéad Melsbach
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Jan J Jobsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Ina Jurgenliemk-Schulz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Ludy C H W Lutgens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Remi A Nout
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Stephanie M de Boer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Melanie E Powell
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Naveena Singh
- Department of Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Linda R Mileshkin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Helen J Mackay
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Odette Cancer Center Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alexandra Leary
- Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France
| | - Hans W Nijman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | | | - Carien L Creutzberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Nanda Horeweg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Viktor H Koelzer
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Tjalling Bosse
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bolla M, Neven A, Maingon P, Carrie C, Boladeras A, Andreopoulos D, Engelen A, Sundar S, van der Steen-Banasik EM, Armstrong J, Peignaux-Casasnovas K, Boustani J, Herrera FG, Pieters BR, Slot A, Bahl A, Scrase CD, Azria D, Jansa J, O'Sullivan JM, Van Den Bergh ACM, Collette L. Short Androgen Suppression and Radiation Dose Escalation in Prostate Cancer: 12-Year Results of EORTC Trial 22991 in Patients With Localized Intermediate-Risk Disease. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:3022-3033. [PMID: 34310202 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.00855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) trial 22991 (NCT00021450) showed that 6 months of concomitant and adjuvant androgen suppression (AS) improves event- (EFS, Phoenix) and clinical disease-free survival (DFS) of intermediate- and high-risk localized prostatic carcinoma, treated by external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) at 70-78 Gy. We report the long-term results in intermediate-risk patients treated with 74 or 78 Gy EBRT, as per current guidelines. PATIENT AND METHODS Of 819 patients randomly assigned between EBRT or EBRT plus AS started on day 1 of EBRT, 481 entered with intermediate risk (International Union Against Cancer TNM 1997 cT1b-c or T2a with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥ 10 ng/mL or Gleason ≤ 7 and PSA ≤ 20 ng/mL, N0M0) and had EBRT planned at 74 (342 patients, 71.1%) or 78 Gy (139 patients, 28.9%). We report the trial primary end point EFS, DFS, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) by intention-to-treat stratified by EBRT dose at two-sided α = 5%. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 12.2 years, 92 of 245 patients and 132 of 236 had EFS events in the EBRT plus AS and EBRT arm, respectively, mostly PSA relapse (48.7%) or death (45.1%). EBRT plus AS improved EFS and DFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.53; CI, 0.41 to 0.70; P < .001 and HR = 0.67; CI, 0.49 to 0.90; P = .008). At 10 years, DMFS was 79.3% (CI, 73.4 to 84.0) with EBRT plus AS and 72.7% (CI, 66.2 to 78.2) with EBRT (HR = 0.74; CI, 0.53 to 1.02; P = .065). With 140 deaths (EBRT plus AS: 64; EBRT: 76), 10-year OS was 80.0% (CI, 74.1 to 84.7) with EBRT plus AS and 74.3% (CI, 67.8 to 79.7) with EBRT, but not statistically significantly different (HR = 0.74; CI, 0.53 to 1.04; P = .082). CONCLUSION Six months of concomitant and adjuvant AS statistically significantly improves EFS and DFS in intermediate-risk prostatic carcinoma, treated by irradiation at 74 or 78 Gy. The effects on OS and DMFS did not reach statistical significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michel Bolla
- Radiotherapy Department Grenoble, Grenoble Alpes University, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble, France
| | - Anouk Neven
- European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Philippe Maingon
- Sorbonne University, APHP Sorbonne University, La Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | | | - Ana Boladeras
- Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology-University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | | | | | - Santhanam Sundar
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust-City Hospital, Consultant Medical Oncologist, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - John Armstrong
- Radiation Oncology Department, All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, St Luke's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Jihane Boustani
- Radiotherapy Department, University Hospital of Besancon-Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France
| | - Fernanda G Herrera
- Radiation Oncology and Immuno-Oncology Service, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Bradley R Pieters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers/University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Annerie Slot
- Radiotherapeutisch Instituut Friesland, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - Amit Bahl
- University Hospitals Bristol National Health Service Foundation Trust-Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol Avon, United Kingdom
| | | | - David Azria
- Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Montpellier, France
| | - Jan Jansa
- Klinika Onkologie a Radioterapie-Fakultni nemocnice Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
| | - Joe M O'Sullivan
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Ireland
| | - Alphonsus C M Van Den Bergh
- Radiotherapy Department, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Laurence Collette
- European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Horeweg N, de Bruyn M, Nout RA, Stelloo E, Kedziersza K, León-Castillo A, Plat A, Mertz KD, Osse M, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM, Lutgens LCHW, Jobsen JJ, van der Steen-Banasik EM, Smit VT, Creutzberg CL, Bosse T, Nijman HW, Koelzer VH, Church DN. Prognostic Integrated Image-Based Immune and Molecular Profiling in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer. Cancer Immunol Res 2020; 8:1508-1519. [PMID: 32999003 DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.cir-20-0149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Revised: 07/02/2020] [Accepted: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Optimum risk stratification in early-stage endometrial cancer combines clinicopathologic factors and the molecular endometrial cancer classification defined by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). It is unclear whether analysis of intratumoral immune infiltrate improves this. We developed a machine-learning, image-based algorithm to quantify density of CD8+ and CD103+ immune cells in tumor epithelium and stroma in 695 stage I endometrioid endometrial cancers from the PORTEC-1 and -2 trials. The relationship between immune cell density and clinicopathologic/molecular factors was analyzed by hierarchical clustering and multiple regression. The prognostic value of immune infiltrate by cell type and location was analyzed by univariable and multivariable Cox regression, incorporating the molecular endometrial cancer classification. Tumor-infiltrating immune cell density varied substantially between cases, and more modestly by immune cell type and location. Clustering revealed three groups with high, intermediate, and low densities, with highly significant variation in the proportion of molecular endometrial cancer subgroups between them. Univariable analysis revealed intraepithelial CD8+ cell density as the strongest predictor of endometrial cancer recurrence; multivariable analysis confirmed this was independent of pathologic factors and molecular subgroup. Exploratory analysis suggested this association was not uniform across molecular subgroups, but greatest in tumors with mutant p53 and absent in DNA mismatch repair-deficient cancers. Thus, this work identified that quantification of intraepithelial CD8+ cells improved upon the prognostic utility of the molecular endometrial cancer classification in early-stage endometrial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nanda Horeweg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Marco de Bruyn
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Remi A Nout
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Ellen Stelloo
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Katarzyna Kedziersza
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Alicia León-Castillo
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Annechien Plat
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Kirsten D Mertz
- Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Institute of Pathology, Liestal, Switzerland
| | - Michelle Osse
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Jan J Jobsen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | | | - Vincent T Smit
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Carien L Creutzberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Tjalling Bosse
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Hans W Nijman
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Viktor H Koelzer
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Oncology and Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - David N Church
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
- Oxford Cancer Centre, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Oxford NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
van den Heerik ASVM, Horeweg N, Nout RA, Lutgens LCHW, van der Steen-Banasik EM, Westerveld GH, van den Berg HA, Slot A, Koppe FLA, Kommoss S, Mens JWM, Nowee ME, Bijmolt S, Cibula D, Stam TC, Jurgenliemk-Schulz IM, Snyers A, Hamann M, Zwanenburg AG, Coen VLMA, Vandecasteele K, Gillham C, Chargari C, Verhoeven-Adema KW, Putter H, van den Hout WB, Wortman BG, Nijman HW, Bosse T, Creutzberg CL. PORTEC-4a: international randomized trial of molecular profile-based adjuvant treatment for women with high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 30:2002-2007. [PMID: 33046573 PMCID: PMC7788476 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 110] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vaginal brachytherapy is currently recommended as adjuvant treatment in patients with high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer to maximize local control and has only mild side effects and no or limited impact on quality of life. However, there is still considerable overtreatment and also some undertreatment, which may be reduced by tailoring adjuvant treatment to the patients' risk of recurrence based on molecular tumor characteristics. PRIMARY OBJECTIVES To compare the rates of vaginal recurrence in women with high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer, treated after surgery with molecular-integrated risk profile-based recommendations for either observation, vaginal brachytherapy or external pelvic beam radiotherapy or with standard adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy STUDY HYPOTHESIS: Adjuvant treatment based on a molecular-integrated risk profile provides similar local control and recurrence-free survival as current standard adjuvant brachytherapy in patients with high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer, while sparing many patients the morbidity of adjuvant treatment and reducing healthcare costs. TRIAL DESIGN A multicenter, international phase III randomized trial (2:1) of molecular-integrated risk profile-based adjuvant treatment (experimental arm) or adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy (standard arm). MAJOR INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA Women aged 18 years and over with a histological diagnosis of high-intermediate risk endometrioid endometrial cancer after total abdominal or laparoscopic hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. High-intermediate risk factors are defined as: (i) International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IA (with invasion) and grade 3; (ii) stage IB grade 1 or 2 with age ≥60 and/or lymph-vascular space invasion; (iii) stage IB, grade 3 without lymph-vascular space invasion; or (iv) stage II (microscopic and grade 1). ENDPOINTS The primary endpoint is vaginal recurrence. Secondary endpoints are recurrence-free and overall survival; pelvic and distant recurrence; 5-year vaginal control (including treatment for relapse); adverse events and patient-reported symptoms and quality of life; and endometrial cancer-related healthcare costs. SAMPLE SIZE 500 eligible and evaluable patients. ESTIMATED DATES FOR COMPLETING ACCRUAL AND PRESENTING RESULTS Estimated date for completing accrual will be late 2021. Estimated date for presentation of (first) results is expected in 2023. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03469674) and ISRCTN (11659025).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nanda Horeweg
- Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Remi A Nout
- Radiation Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center - Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Ludy C H W Lutgens
- Radiation Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands
| | | | - G Henrike Westerveld
- Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Hetty A van den Berg
- Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Noord-Brabant, The Netherlands
| | - Annerie Slot
- Radiation Oncology, Radiotherapy Institute Friesland, Leeuwarden, Friesland, The Netherlands
| | - Friederike L A Koppe
- Radiation Oncology, Institute Verbeeten, Tilburg, Noord-Brabant, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan Kommoss
- Women's Health, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Jan Willem M Mens
- Radiation Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center - Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Marlies E Nowee
- Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan Bijmolt
- Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - David Cibula
- Gynecologic Oncology Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Tanja C Stam
- Radiation Oncology, Haaglanden Medical Center, Den Haag, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | | | - An Snyers
- Radiation Oncology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands
| | - Moritz Hamann
- Women's Health, Rotkreuzklinikum Munchen, Munchen, Bayern, Germany
| | | | - Veronique L M A Coen
- Radiation Oncology, Zuidwest Radiotherapeutic Institute, Vlissingen, Zeeland, The Netherlands
| | | | - Charles Gillham
- Radiation Oncology, St. Luke's Hospital Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Cyrus Chargari
- Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, Île-de-France, France
| | | | - Hein Putter
- Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Wilbert B van den Hout
- Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Bastiaan G Wortman
- Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Hans W Nijman
- Obstetrics & Gynecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Tjalling Bosse
- Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Carien L Creutzberg
- Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
van der Steen-Banasik EM, Oosterveld BJ, Smits GA. Don’t forget Arnhem! Radiother Oncol 2020; 147:236. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
7
|
van der Steen-Banasik EM, Oosterveld BJ, Smits GA. In Regard to Vashistha et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 99:757. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2017] [Accepted: 07/01/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
8
|
Lutgens LC, Koper PC, Jobsen JJ, van der Steen-Banasik EM, Creutzberg CL, van den Berg HA, Ottevanger PB, van Rhoon GC, van Doorn HC, Houben R, van der Zee J. Radiation therapy combined with hyperthermia versus cisplatin for locally advanced cervical cancer: Results of the randomized RADCHOC trial. Radiother Oncol 2016; 120:378-382. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2015] [Revised: 02/01/2016] [Accepted: 02/01/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
9
|
Bolla M, Maingon P, Carrie C, Villa S, Kitsios P, Poortmans PM, Sundar S, van der Steen-Banasik EM, Armstrong J, Bosset JF, Herrera FG, Pieters B, Slot A, Bahl A, Ben-Yosef R, Boehmer D, Scrase C, Renard L, Shash E, Coens C, van den Bergh AC, Collette L. Short Androgen Suppression and Radiation Dose Escalation for Intermediate- and High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer: Results of EORTC Trial 22991. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34:1748-56. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.64.8055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 147] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Up to 30% of patients who undergo radiation for intermediate- or high-risk localized prostate cancer relapse biochemically within 5 years. We assessed if biochemical disease-free survival (DFS) is improved by adding 6 months of androgen suppression (AS; two injections of every-3-months depot of luteinizing hormone–releasing hormone agonist) to primary radiotherapy (RT) for intermediate- or high-risk localized prostate cancer. Patients and Methods A total of 819 patients staged: (1) cT1b-c, with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥ 10 ng/mL or Gleason ≥ 7, or (2) cT2a (International Union Against Cancer TNM 1997), with no involvement of pelvic lymph nodes and no clinical evidence of metastatic spread, with PSA ≤ 50 ng/mL, were centrally randomized 1:1 to either RT or RT plus AS started on day 1 of RT. Centers opted for one dose (70, 74, or 78 Gy). Biochemical DFS, the primary end point, was defined from entry until PSA relapse (Phoenix criteria) and clinical relapse by imaging or death of any cause. The trial had 80% power to detect hazard ratio (HR), 0.714 by intent-to-treat analysis stratified by dose of RT at the two-sided α = 5%. Results The median patient age was 70 years. Among patients, 74.8% were intermediate risk and 24.8% were high risk. In the RT arm, 407 of 409 patients received RT; in the RT plus AS arm, 403 patients received RT plus AS and three patients received RT only. At 7.2 years median follow-up, RT plus AS significantly improved biochemical DFS (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.66; P < .001, with 319 events), as well as clinical progression-free survival (205 events, HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.84; P = .001). In exploratory analysis, no statistically significant interaction between treatment effect and dose of RT could be evidenced (heterogeneity P = .79 and P = .66, for biochemical DFS and progression-free survival, respectively). Overall survival data are not mature yet. Conclusion Six months of concomitant and adjuvant AS improves biochemical and clinical DFS of intermediate- and high-risk cT1b-c to cT2a (with no involvement of pelvic lymph nodes and no clinical evidence of metastatic spread) prostatic carcinoma, treated by radiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michel Bolla
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - Philippe Maingon
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - Christian Carrie
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - Salvador Villa
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - Petros Kitsios
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - Philip M.P. Poortmans
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - Santhanam Sundar
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - Elzbieta M. van der Steen-Banasik
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - John Armstrong
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - Jean-François Bosset
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - Fernanda G. Herrera
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - Bradley Pieters
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - Annerie Slot
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - Amit Bahl
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - Rahamim Ben-Yosef
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - Dirk Boehmer
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - Christopher Scrase
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - Laurette Renard
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - Emad Shash
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - Corneel Coens
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - Alphonsus C.M. van den Bergh
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - Laurence Collette
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Stelloo E, Nout RA, Osse EM, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IJ, Jobsen JJ, Lutgens LC, van der Steen-Banasik EM, Nijman HW, Putter H, Bosse T, Creutzberg CL, Smit VTHBM. Improved Risk Assessment by Integrating Molecular and Clinicopathological Factors in Early-stage Endometrial Cancer-Combined Analysis of the PORTEC Cohorts. Clin Cancer Res 2016; 22:4215-24. [PMID: 27006490 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-2878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 488] [Impact Index Per Article: 61.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2015] [Accepted: 03/08/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Recommendations for adjuvant treatment for women with early-stage endometrial carcinoma are based on clinicopathologic features. Comprehensive genomic characterization defined four subgroups: p53-mutant, microsatellite instability (MSI), POLE-mutant, and no specific molecular profile (NSMP). We aimed to confirm the prognostic capacity of these subgroups in large randomized trial populations, investigate potential other prognostic classifiers, and integrate these into an integrated molecular risk assessment guiding adjuvant therapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Analysis of MSI, hotspot mutations in 14 genes including POLE, protein expression of p53, ARID1a, β-catenin, L1CAM, PTEN, ER, and PR was undertaken on 947 available early-stage endometrioid endometrial carcinomas from the PORTEC-1 and -2 trials, mostly high-intermediate risk (n = 614). Prognostic value was determined using univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models. AUCs of different risk stratification models were compared. RESULTS Molecular analyses were feasible in >96% of the patients and confirmed the four molecular subgroups: p53-mutant (9%), MSI (26%), POLE-mutant (6%), and NSMP (59%). Integration of prognostic molecular alterations with established clinicopathologic factors resulted in a stronger model with improved risk prognostication. Approximately 15% of high-intermediate risk patients had unfavorable features (substantial lymphovascular space invasion, p53-mutant, and/or >10% L1CAM), 50% favorable features (POLE-mutant, NSMP being microsatellite stable, and CTNNB1 wild-type), and 35% intermediate features (MSI or CTNNB1-mutant). CONCLUSIONS Integrating clinicopathologic and molecular factors improves the risk assessment of patients with early-stage endometrial carcinoma. Assessment of this integrated risk profile is feasible in daily practice, and holds promise to reduce both overtreatment and undertreatment. Clin Cancer Res; 22(16); 4215-24. ©2016 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen Stelloo
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Remi A Nout
- Department of Medical and Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Elisabeth M Osse
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jan J Jobsen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Ludy C Lutgens
- MAASTtricht Radiation Oncology Clinic, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Hans W Nijman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Hein Putter
- Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Tjalling Bosse
- Department of Medical and Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Carien L Creutzberg
- Department of Medical and Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Vincent T H B M Smit
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bolla M, Van Den Bergh AC, Carrie C, Villà S, Kitsios P, Poortmans PM, Sundar S, van der Steen-Banasik EM, Armstrong J, Bosset JF, Herrera F, Pieters B, Slot A, Bahl A, Collette L, Maingon P. EORTC trial 22991: Results of a phase III study comparing 6 months of androgen suppression and irradiation versus irradiation alone for localized T1b-cT2aN0M0 prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.34.2_suppl.22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
22 Background: Up to 30% patients irradiated for intermediate- or high-risk localized prostate cancer experience relapse biochemically within 5 years. We assessed if biochemical disease-free survival (BDFS) is improved by adding 6 months of androgen suppression (AS) – twice 3-month depot LHRH-agonist to primary irradiation (RT) for intermediate or high risk localized T1b-cT2a N0M0 prostate cancer. Methods: 819 patients staged cT1b-c with PSA ≥ 10 ng/ml or Gleason ≥ 7 or cT2a (UICC TNM 1997) N0 M0 with PSA ≤ 50 ng/ml were randomized between RT or RT+ADT. Centers elected one dose of prostate irradiation: 70, 74, or 78 Gy. Irradiation of pelvic nodes was left to the discretion of each institution. The trial aimed to show an increase of +7.5% in 5-year BPFS (HR=0.714) with 80% power. This requires 274 events in intent-to-treat analysis. HRQoL was assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30+PR25 (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00021450). Results: Patients were 70 y old in median, 88% had WHO PS 0, 74.8% were intermediate risk, and 24.8% high risk. In the RT arm, 407/409 received RT, in the RT+ADT, 403/410 received RT+ AS and 3 RT. Six patients refused treatment. After a median follow-up of 7.2 years, 201 and 118 events for BPFS were observed in the RT and RT+ AS arm. RT+ AS improved BPFS compared to RT (HR=0.53, CI: 0.42-0.67, P<0.001) irrespective of the radiation dose (heterogeneity P>0.1). The 5-y BPFS increased from 69.3% to 82.5%. Clinical PFS was also statistically significantly improved (205 events, HR=0.63, CI: 0.48-0.84, P=0.001, +7.9% at 5 years). Late genitourinary toxicity was reported by 5.9% vs. 3.6% of the patients, on RT+ AS and RT, respectively (p=0.14), whereas 27.0% vs 19.4% reported severe impairment of sexual function (p=0.010). Overall HRQoL did not differ between the groups. Hormonal treatment symptoms, sexual activity and functioning scales are clinically significantly impaired by AS at month 6 and year 1; from year 2 no marked difference is seen. Conclusions: The addition of 6 months of medical castration to primary irradiation improves BPFS and PFS in intermediate- and high-risk localized T1b-cT2a N0M0 prostatic carcinoma with no persistent detriment on HRQoL or sexual function. Clinical trial information: NCT00021450.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michel Bolla
- Grenoble Alpes University, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Radiotherapy Department, Grenoble, France
| | | | | | - Salvador Villà
- Catalan Institute of Oncology - University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Radiation Oncology Department, Badalona, Spain
| | - Petros Kitsios
- Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Radiotherapy Department, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Philip M. Poortmans
- Radiation Oncology Department, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Santhanam Sundar
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust - City Hospital, Consultant Medical Oncologist, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - John Armstrong
- ICORG (All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group), St Luke's Hospital, Radiation Oncology Department, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jean-Francois Bosset
- University Hospital of Besançon - Jean Minjoz Hospital, Radiotherapy Department, Besançon, France
| | - Fernanda Herrera
- University Hospital of Lausanne, Radiation Oncology Department, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Bradley Pieters
- Academic Medical Center - University of Amsterdam, Radiation Oncology Department, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Annerie Slot
- Radiotherapeutisch Instituut Friesland, Leeuwarden, Netherlands
| | - Amit Bahl
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust - Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Department of Oncology, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | | | - Philippe Maingon
- Georges-François Leclerc Center, Radiotherapy Department, Dijon, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bosse T, Peters EE, Creutzberg CL, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM, Jobsen JJ, Mens JWM, Lutgens LC, van der Steen-Banasik EM, Smit VT, Nout RA. Substantial lymph-vascular space invasion (LVSI) is a significant risk factor for recurrence in endometrial cancer – A pooled analysis of PORTEC 1 and 2 trials. Eur J Cancer 2015; 51:1742-50. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 182] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2015] [Revised: 05/12/2015] [Accepted: 05/14/2015] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
13
|
Westhoff PG, de Graeff A, Monninkhof EM, Bollen L, Dijkstra SP, van der Steen-Banasik EM, van Vulpen M, Leer JWH, Marijnen CA, van der Linden YM. An easy tool to predict survival in patients receiving radiation therapy for painful bone metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014; 90:739-47. [PMID: 25260489 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.07.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2014] [Revised: 07/23/2014] [Accepted: 07/31/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with bone metastases have a widely varying survival. A reliable estimation of survival is needed for appropriate treatment strategies. Our goal was to assess the value of simple prognostic factors, namely, patient and tumor characteristics, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), and patient-reported scores of pain and quality of life, to predict survival in patients with painful bone metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS In the Dutch Bone Metastasis Study, 1157 patients were treated with radiation therapy for painful bone metastases. At randomization, physicians determined the KPS; patients rated general health on a visual analogue scale (VAS-gh), valuation of life on a verbal rating scale (VRS-vl) and pain intensity. To assess the predictive value of the variables, we used multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses and C-statistics for discriminative value. Of the final model, calibration was assessed. External validation was performed on a dataset of 934 patients who were treated with radiation therapy for vertebral metastases. RESULTS Patients had mainly breast (39%), prostate (23%), or lung cancer (25%). After a maximum of 142 weeks' follow-up, 74% of patients had died. The best predictive model included sex, primary tumor, visceral metastases, KPS, VAS-gh, and VRS-vl (C-statistic = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.70-0.74). A reduced model, with only KPS and primary tumor, showed comparable discriminative capacity (C-statistic = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.69-0.72). External validation showed a C-statistic of 0.72 (95% CI = 0.70-0.73). Calibration of the derivation and the validation dataset showed underestimation of survival. CONCLUSION In predicting survival in patients with painful bone metastases, KPS combined with primary tumor was comparable to a more complex model. Considering the amount of variables in complex models and the additional burden on patients, the simple model is preferred for daily use. In addition, a risk table for survival is provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulien G Westhoff
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Alexander de Graeff
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Evelyn M Monninkhof
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Laurens Bollen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - Sander P Dijkstra
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marco van Vulpen
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Willem H Leer
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Corrie A Marijnen
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Jobsen JJ, ten Cate LN, Lybeert ML, van der Steen-Banasik EM, Scholten A, van der Palen J, Slot A, Kroese MCS, Schutter EM, Siesling S. The number of metastatic sites for stage IIIA endometrial carcinoma, endometrioid cell type, is a strong negative prognostic factor. Gynecol Oncol 2010; 117:32-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2009] [Revised: 12/01/2009] [Accepted: 12/05/2009] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
|
15
|
Nout RA, Putter H, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM, Jobsen JJ, Lutgens LCHW, van der Steen-Banasik EM, Mens JWM, Slot A, Stenfert Kroese MC, van Bunningen BNFM, Smit VTHBM, Nijman HW, van den Tol PP, Creutzberg CL. Quality of life after pelvic radiotherapy or vaginal brachytherapy for endometrial cancer: first results of the randomized PORTEC-2 trial. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27:3547-56. [PMID: 19546404 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.20.2424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 185] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Studies on quality of life (QOL) among women with endometrial cancer have shown that patients who undergo pelvic radiotherapy report lower role functioning and more diarrhea and fatigue. In the Post Operative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Cancer (PORTEC) trial, patients with endometrial carcinoma were randomly assigned to receive external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or vaginal brachytherapy (VBT). QOL was evaluated by using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 and subscales from the prostate cancer module, PR-25, and the ovarian cancer module, OV-28. PATIENTS AND METHODS PORTEC-2 accrued 427 patients between 2002 and 2006, of whom 214 were randomly assigned to EBRT, and 213 were randomly assigned to VBT. Three-hundred forty-eight patients (81%) were evaluable for QOL. QOL outcomes were analyzed at a median follow-up of 2 years. Results At baseline after surgery, patient functioning was at the lowest level, and it increased during and after radiotherapy to reach a plateau after 12 months. Patients in the VBT group reported better social functioning (P < .002) and lower symptom scores for diarrhea, fecal leakage, the need to stay close to the toilet, and limitation in daily activities because of bowel symptoms (P < .001). At baseline, 15% of patients were sexually active; this increased significantly to 39% during the first year (P < .001). Sexual functioning and symptoms did not differ between the treatment groups. CONCLUSION Patients who received EBRT reported significantly higher levels of diarrhea and bowel symptoms. This resulted in a higher need to remain close to a toilet and, as a consequence, more limitation of daily activities because of bowel symptoms and decreased social functioning. Vaginal brachytherapy provides a better QOL, and should be the preferred treatment from a QOL perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Remi A Nout
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Westermann AM, Jones EL, Schem BC, van der Steen-Banasik EM, Koper P, Mella O, Uitterhoeve ALJ, de Wit R, van der Velden J, Burger C, van der Wilt CL, Dahl O, Prosnitz LR, van der Zee J. First results of triple-modality treatment combining radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and hyperthermia for the treatment of patients with stage IIB, III, and IVA cervical carcinoma. Cancer 2005; 104:763-70. [PMID: 15968685 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with advanced cervical carcinoma are treated routinely with radiotherapy and cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. It has been shown that hyperthermia can improve the results of both radiotherapy and cisplatin. In the current study, the feasibility and efficacy of the combination of all three modalities was studied in previously untreated patients with cervical carcinoma. METHODS Patients with advanced cervical carcinoma were registered prospectively in the U.S., Norway, and the Netherlands. External-beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy were administered for a biologically effective dose > or = 86.7 gray. At least 4 courses of weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m(2)) and 4 sessions of weekly locoregional hyperthermia were added to radiotherapy. RESULTS Sixty-eight patients with a median age of 45 years were enrolled. Full-dose radiotherapy was delivered to all patients according to plan. At least 4 courses of chemotherapy were received by 97% of patients, and at least 4 courses of hyperthermia treatment were received by 93% of patients. Toxicity was fully comparable to that described for chemoradiotherapy alone, and the median total treatment time was 45 days. Complete remission was achieved by 61 patients (90%). After a median follow-up of 538 days, 74% of patients remained alive without signs of recurrence, and the overall survival rate was 84%. CONCLUSIONS The combination of full-dose radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and hyperthermia was feasible and effective in a multicenter international setting among patients with advanced cervical carcinoma. A Phase III study comparing this novel triplet with standard chemoradiation, designed to show at least a 15% improvement in overall survival, has been launched.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anneke M Westermann
- Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|