1
|
|
2
|
Ledermann JA, Matias-Guiu X, Amant F, Concin N, Davidson B, Fotopoulou C, González-Martin A, Gourley C, Leary A, Lorusso D, Banerjee S, Chiva L, Cibula D, Colombo N, Croce S, Eriksson AG, Falandry C, Fischerova D, Harter P, Joly F, Lazaro C, Lok C, Mahner S, Marmé F, Marth C, McCluggage WG, McNeish IA, Morice P, Nicum S, Oaknin A, Pérez-Fidalgo JA, Pignata S, Ramirez PT, Ray-Coquard I, Romero I, Scambia G, Sehouli J, Shapira-Frommer R, Sundar S, Tan DSP, Taskiran C, van Driel WJ, Vergote I, Planchamp F, Sessa C, Fagotti A. ESGO-ESMO-ESP consensus conference recommendations on ovarian cancer: pathology and molecular biology and early, advanced and recurrent disease. Ann Oncol 2024; 35:248-266. [PMID: 38307807 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Revised: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2024] Open
Abstract
The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the European Society of Pathology held a consensus conference (CC) on ovarian cancer on 15-16 June 2022 in Valencia, Spain. The CC panel included 44 experts in the management of ovarian cancer and pathology, an ESMO scientific advisor and a methodologist. The aim was to discuss new or contentious topics and develop recommendations to improve and harmonise the management of patients with ovarian cancer. Eighteen questions were identified for discussion under four main topics: (i) pathology and molecular biology, (ii) early-stage disease and pelvic mass in pregnancy, (iii) advanced stage (including older/frail patients) and (iv) recurrent disease. The panel was divided into four working groups (WGs) to each address questions relating to one of the four topics outlined above, based on their expertise. Relevant scientific literature was reviewed in advance. Recommendations were developed by the WGs and then presented to the entire panel for further discussion and amendment before voting. This manuscript focuses on the recommendation statements that reached a consensus, their voting results and a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J A Ledermann
- Department of Oncology, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK.
| | - X Matias-Guiu
- CIBERONC, Madrid; Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, IRBLLEIDA, University of Lleida, Lleida; Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - F Amant
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Gynecology, Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - N Concin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria; Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - B Davidson
- Department of Pathology, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - C Fotopoulou
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - A González-Martin
- Department of Medical Oncology and Program in Solid Tumours-Cima, Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - C Gourley
- Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - A Leary
- Department of Medicine, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - D Lorusso
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome; Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - S Banerjee
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - L Chiva
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Navarra, Spain
| | - D Cibula
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - N Colombo
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia IRCCS, Milan; Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - S Croce
- Department of Biopathology, Bergonié Institut, Bordeaux, France
| | - A G Eriksson
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - C Falandry
- Institute of Aging, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon; CarMeN Laboratory, INSERM U1060/Université Lyon 1/INRAE U1397/Hospices Civils Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - D Fischerova
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - P Harter
- Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) Study Group, Germany
| | - F Joly
- GINECO Group, Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François-Baclesse, University of Caen Normandy, Caen, France
| | - C Lazaro
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO-IDIBELL-CIBERONC), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C Lok
- Department of Gynecology, Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Mahner
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) Study Group, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich
| | - F Marmé
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) Study Group, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim; Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - C Marth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - W G McCluggage
- Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - I A McNeish
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - P Morice
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - S Nicum
- Department of Oncology, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - A Oaknin
- Gynaecologic Cancer Programme, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona
| | - J A Pérez-Fidalgo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínico Universitario - INCLIVA, CIBERONC, Valencia, Spain
| | - S Pignata
- Department of Urology and Gynecology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - P T Ramirez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, USA
| | - I Ray-Coquard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, University Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
| | - I Romero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Instituto Valenciano Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| | - G Scambia
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome; Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - J Sehouli
- North-Eastern German Society of Gynecological Oncology (NOGGO), Berlin; Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Charité Berlin University of Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - S Sundar
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Pan Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - D S P Tan
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; National University of Singapore (NUS) Centre for Cancer Research, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Cancer Science Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute Singapore, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - C Taskiran
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, School of Medicine, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - W J van Driel
- Department of Gynecology, Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I Vergote
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - C Sessa
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - A Fagotti
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome; Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
|
4
|
Fotopoulou C, Hall M, Lord R, Miller R, Sundar S, Roebuck N, Fildes L, Wesselbaum A, McCormack S, Hickey J, Ledermann J. Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals on the Management and Treatment of Advanced Ovarian Cancer in the UK: Results From the KNOW-OC Survey. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2024; 36:e1-e10. [PMID: 37923688 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.10.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2022] [Revised: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
AIMS New treatment options for advanced ovarian cancer have the potential to significantly change the treatment pathway in the UK. Understanding the structures and responsibilities of multidisciplinary teams/tumour boards (MDT) and regional variations will enable services to adapt more effectively to these changes. MATERIALS AND METHODS The KNOW-OC survey was conducted in 2020 to understand the views of a selected group of 66 healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved in advanced ovarian cancer care in UK hospitals. RESULTS The results showed that MDT involvement in the management of advanced ovarian cancer varied depending on pathway stage and line of relapse, with 98.5% of HCPs responding that the MDT was involved in decisions at initial presentation, but only 40.9% for patients with multiple relapses. The MDT was mostly responsible for determining whether the patients would undergo primary or interval cytoreductive surgery according to 75.8% of respondents, and most HCPs (80.3%) stated that tumour dissemination patterns were the most important factor influencing this decision. The most commonly assessed biomarkers at the time of the survey were CA125, gBRCA and tBRCA. Homologous recombination deficiency was viewed as the second most important factor for determining prognosis, but few centres had access to testing at the time of survey completion. The use of active surveillance was expected to decrease in favour of first-line targeted therapies. Nearly all (98.5%) HCPs agreed there is a role for secondary cytoreductive surgery for the treatment of recurrence (for carefully selected patients). CONCLUSIONS The results highlighted UK-specific geographical variation in the views of HCPs on MDT involvement and specific practices, such as molecular biomarker testing, and the overall treatment approach. Together, these findings improve the understanding of reported clinical practice across the UK for ovarian cancer and provide insight into decision-making associated with updates to recommendations for best practice (e.g. European Society for Medical Oncology/European Society of Gynaecological Oncology consensus statements) and the introduction of new treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Fotopoulou
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.
| | - M Hall
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK
| | - R Lord
- Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Liverpool, UK
| | - R Miller
- University College London, London, UK
| | - S Sundar
- Pan Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK; Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - J Ledermann
- University College London Cancer Institute and UCL Hospitals, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Azari N, Yakovlev M, Rye N, Dunsiger SR, Sundar S, Bordelon MM, Thomas SM, Thompson JD, Rosa PFS, Sonier JE. Absence of Spontaneous Magnetic Fields due to Time-Reversal Symmetry Breaking in Bulk Superconducting UTe_{2}. Phys Rev Lett 2023; 131:226504. [PMID: 38101387 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.131.226504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
We have investigated the low-temperature local magnetic properties in the bulk of molten salt-flux (MSF)-grown single crystals of the candidate odd-parity superconductor UTe_{2} by zero-field muon spin relaxation (μSR). In contrast to previous μSR studies of UTe_{2} single crystals grown by a chemical vapor transport method, we find no evidence of magnetic clusters or electronic moments fluctuating slow enough to cause a discernible relaxation of the zero-field μSR asymmetry spectrum. Consequently, our measurements on MSF-grown single crystals rule out the generation of spontaneous magnetic fields in the bulk that would occur near impurities or lattice defects if the superconducting state of UTe_{2} breaks time-reversal symmetry. This result suggests that UTe_{2} is characterized by a single-component superconducting order parameter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Azari
- Department of Physics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada
| | - M Yakovlev
- Department of Physics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada
| | - N Rye
- Department of Physics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada
| | - S R Dunsiger
- Department of Physics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada
- Centre for Molecular and Materials Science, TRIUMF, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 2A3, Canada
| | - S Sundar
- Scottish Universities Physics Alliance, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews KY16 9SS, United Kingdom
| | - M M Bordelon
- Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
| | - S M Thomas
- Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
| | - J D Thompson
- Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
| | - P F S Rosa
- Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
| | - J E Sonier
- Department of Physics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vijayan PM, Sundar S. An automated system of intrusion detection by IoT-aided MQTT using improved heuristic-aided autoencoder and LSTM-based Deep Belief Network. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0291872. [PMID: 37792753 PMCID: PMC10550182 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The IoT offered an enormous number of services with the help of multiple applications so it faces various security-related problems and also heavy malicious attacks. Initially, the IoT data are gathered from the standard dataset as Message Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTT) set. Further, the collected data are undergone the pre-processing stage, which is accomplished by using data cleaning and data transformation. The resultant processed data is given into two models named (i) Autoencoder with Deep Belief Network (DBN), in which the optimal features are selected from Autoencoder with the aid of Modified Archimedes Optimization Algorithm (MAOA). Further, the optimal features are subjected to the AL-DBN model, where the first classified outcomes are obtained with the parameter optimization of MAOA. Similarly, (ii) Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) with DBN, in this model, the optimal features are chosen from LSTM with the aid of MAOA. Consequently, the optimal features are subjected into the AL-DBN model, where the second classified outcomes are acquired. Finally, the average score is estimated by two outcomes to provide the final classified result. Thus, the findings reveal that the suggested system achieves outstanding results to detect the attack significantly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P. M. Vijayan
- School of Electronics Engineering (SENSE), Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nādu, India
| | - S. Sundar
- School of Electronics Engineering (SENSE), Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nādu, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sundar S. Patient experts should reflect the spectrum of patient views. BMJ 2023; 382:1539. [PMID: 37419614 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.p1539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/09/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Santhanam Sundar
- Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trust, City Hospital, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lavanya K, Shankar PV, Visvanathan K, Sundar S, Philohazeena P. Deep Brain Stimulation for Holmes Tremors and Literature Review. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2023; 26:296-299. [PMID: 37538416 PMCID: PMC10394444 DOI: 10.4103/aian.aian_720_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Revised: 03/12/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kunkala Lavanya
- Department of Neurology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (SRIHER), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - P. Vijaya Shankar
- Department of Neurology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (SRIHER), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - K. Visvanathan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (SRIHER), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - S. Sundar
- Department of Neurology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (SRIHER), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - P. Philohazeena
- Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (SRIHER), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Affiliation(s)
- Santhanam Sundar
- Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trust, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Matheen MA, Sundar S. A Novel Technique to Mitigate the Data Redundancy and to Improvise Network Lifetime Using Fuzzy Criminal Search Ebola Optimization for WMSN. Sensors (Basel) 2023; 23:2218. [PMID: 36850823 PMCID: PMC9960758 DOI: 10.3390/s23042218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Wireless Multimedia Sensor Network (WMSN) is a powerful technology that is widely used to gather data and monitor the actual environment for analysis. Furthermore, multimedia applications' needs and the features, such as constrained latency and high bandwidth consumption, complicate the design of WMSN routing protocols. Despite several methods, the trouble of designing WMSNs routing protocol remains a hurdle. The miniaturization and enhancement of hardware facilitate an extensive range of applications in the military and public sectors. On the contrary, the streaming of multimedia content is captured and generated due to some event-triggered surveillance for a long duration of time. Hence, it is necessary for wireless multimedia sensor network (WMSN) to provide a strong hardware foundation, thereby satisfying Quality of Service (QoS) requirements. Initially, the network is clustered into several clusters and the nodes with rich resources are chosen as cluster heads. The significant intention of this paper is to eliminate data redundancy and to select optimal cluster heads, thereby minimizing the energy consumption. Therefore, this paper proposes a novel Fuzzy Criminal Search Ebola Optimization (FCSEO) algorithm for optimal selection of cluster heads. In addition to this, the data redundancy present in the proposed algorithm is mitigated and thus the network lifetime is enhanced. Finally, extensive experimentation is carried out for various performance measures to determine the efficiency of the proposed approach.
Collapse
|
11
|
Crabb SJ, Hussain S, Soulis E, Hinsley S, Dempsey L, Trevethan A, Song Y, Barber J, Frew J, Gale J, Faust G, Brock S, McGovern U, Parikh O, Enting D, Sundar S, Ratnayake G, Lees K, Birtle AJ, Powles T, Jones RJ. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Biomarker-Selected, Phase II Clinical Trial of Maintenance Poly ADP-Ribose Polymerase Inhibition With Rucaparib Following Chemotherapy for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:54-64. [PMID: 35960902 PMCID: PMC9788980 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.00405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2022] [Revised: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE A DNA repair deficiency (DRD) phenotype exists within a subset of metastatic urothelial carcinomas (mUC) predicting benefit from platinum-based chemotherapy. We tested switch maintenance therapy with the poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitor rucaparib, following chemotherapy, for DRD biomarker-positive mUC. METHODS DRD biomarker-positive mUC patients, within 10 weeks of chemotherapy, and without cancer progression, were randomly assigned (1:1) to maintenance rucaparib 600 mg twice a day orally, or placebo, until disease progression. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Statistical analysis targeted a hazard ratio of 0.5 with a 20% one-sided α for this signal-seeking trial. PFS (RECIST 1.1) was compared between trial arms, by intention to treat, within a Cox model. RESULTS Out of 248 patients, 74 (29.8%) were DRD biomarker-positive and 40 were randomly assigned. A total of 12 (60%) and 20 (100%) PFS events occurred in the rucaparib and placebo arms, respectively (median follow-up was 94.6 weeks in those still alive). Median PFS was 35.3 weeks (80% CI, 11.7 to 35.6) with rucaparib and 15.1 weeks (80% CI, 11.9 to 22.6) with placebo (hazard ratio, 0.53; 80% CI, 0.30 to 0.92; one-sided P = .07). In the safety population (n = 39) treatment-related adverse events were mostly low grade. Patients received a median duration of 10 rucaparib or six placebo cycles on treatment. Treatment-related adverse events (all grades) of fatigue (63.2% v 30.0%), nausea (36.8% v 5.0%), rash (21.1% v 0%), and raised alanine aminotransferase (57.9% v 10%) were more common with rucaparib. CONCLUSION Maintenance rucaparib, following platinum-based chemotherapy, extended PFS in DRD biomarker-selected patients with mUC and was tolerable. Further investigation of poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibition in selected patients with mUC is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon J. Crabb
- Southampton Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Syed Hussain
- University of Sheffield and Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Eileen Soulis
- CRUK Glasgow Clinical Trials Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Samantha Hinsley
- CRUK Glasgow Clinical Trials Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Laura Dempsey
- CRUK Glasgow Clinical Trials Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Avril Trevethan
- CRUK Glasgow Clinical Trials Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - YeePei Song
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Jim Barber
- Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - John Frew
- Northern Centre for Cancer Care, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Joanna Gale
- Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom
| | - Guy Faust
- Leicester Royal Infirmary NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Susannah Brock
- Dorset Cancer Centre, University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, United Kingdom
| | - Ursula McGovern
- University College Hospital, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Omi Parikh
- Royal Blackburn Teaching Hospital, East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackburn, United Kingdom
| | - Deborah Enting
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Santhanam Sundar
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - Kathryn Lees
- Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Maidstone, United Kingdom
| | - Alison J. Birtle
- Rosemere Cancer Centre, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, United Kingdom
| | | | - Robert J. Jones
- CRUK Glasgow Clinical Trials Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sundar S, Sumathy S. RetU-Net: An Enhanced U-Net Architecture for Retinal Lesion Segmentation. INT J ARTIF INTELL T 2022. [DOI: 10.1142/s0218213023500136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
13
|
Giri P, Grzesiek A, Żuławiński W, Sundar S, Wyłomańska A. The modified Yule-Walker method for multidimensional infinite-variance periodic autoregressive model of order 1. J Korean Stat Soc 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s42952-022-00191-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
14
|
Sundar S, Dsouza NV, Achappa B, Manoj MA, Vinay BS. UNUSUAL CASES OF ACUTE PANCREATITIS IN PATIENTS WITH COVID-19. Ulster Med J 2022; 91:170-171. [PMID: 36474848 PMCID: PMC9720581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S Sundar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
| | - NV Dsouza
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India,Corresponding Author: Dr. Nikhil Victor DSouza, Department of Internal Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Light House Hill Road, Mangalore-575001, Karnataka, India. Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India. Contact No: 9980445801 Email Id:
| | - B Achappa
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
| | - MA Manoj
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
| | - BS Vinay
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Morgan R, Clamp A, Barnes B, Schlecht H, Yarram-Smith L, Wallis Y, Morgan S, Valganon M, Hudson E, McKenna S, Sundar S, Nicum S, Brenton J, Kristeleit R, Banerjee S, McNeish I, Ledermann J, Taylor S, Evans G, Jayson G. 575P Homologous recombination deficiency in newly diagnosed FIGO stage III/IV high-grade serous or endometrioid ovarian cancer: A multi-national observational study. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
|
16
|
Woopen H, Sehouli J, Davis A, Lee Y, Cohen P, Ferrero A, Gleeson N, Jhingran A, Kajimoto Y, Mayadev J, Barretina-Ginesta M, Sundar S, Suzuki N, van Dorst E, Joly F. Erratum to “GCIG-Consensus guideline for long-term survivorship in gynecologic cancer: A position paper from the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) symptom benefit committee” [Cancer Treatm. Rev. 107 (2022) 102396]. Cancer Treat Rev 2022; 109:102431. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2022.102431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
17
|
Crabb S, Dempsey L, Soulis E, Hinsley S, Song Y, Barber J, Frew J, Gale J, Faust G, Brock S, McGovern U, Parikh O, Enting D, Sundar S, Ratnayake G, Lees K, Hussain S, Powles T, Jones R, Tapper W. 1772P Characterisation of a DNA repair deficiency (DRD) biomarker phenotype in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) within the ATLANTIS clinical trial platform. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.1850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
18
|
Ramana Reddy JV, Ha H, Sundar S. Modelling and simulation of fluid flow through stenosis and aneurysm blood vessel: a computational hemodynamic analysis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2022:1-23. [PMID: 35993592 DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2022.2112184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
In this article, the hemodynamics of nanofluid flow through the modelled stenosis-aneurysm models in the presence of the catheter has been studied. The eight stenosis-aneurysm models are developed to mimic biological observations and thus make the model more realistic. The mathematical understanding helps in treating the stenosis in the blood vessel by targeting the unhealthy region to the drug, which is coated on nanoparticles. The catheter achieves the active drug release to the aimed organs by coating on the catheter surface, which adds additional benefits. In the present hemodynamic study, the blood is modeled as a couple stress fluid; as a result, the highly non-linear momentum, temperature, and concentration equations were obtained. The fluid flow equations' complexity is further increased by incorporating the variable viscosity effects that arose due to the suspension of nanoparticles. The resultant mathematical model is solved by using the homotopy perturbation method. The convergence of the perturbed solutions is studied and depicted the degree of deformation in the case of temperature and concentration. The effects of the porous nature of the stenosis, no-slip at the catheter surface, and the free slip at the blood vessel boundary in the non-stenotic region are also considered in the model. The essential physiological property like surface shear stress is computed, and various parameters' influence on shear stress is analyzed. The present analysis can be helpful in understanding the enhancement in mass dispersion and heat transfer in unhealthy blood vessels, which could be used for drug delivery in the treatment of stenotic conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J V Ramana Reddy
- Advanced Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
| | - Hojin Ha
- Department of Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Kangwon-do, Korea
| | - S Sundar
- Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Affiliation(s)
- Santhanam Sundar
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Affiliation(s)
- Santhanam Sundar
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
James ND, Ingleby FC, Clarke NW, Amos CL, Attard G, Brawley CD, Chowdhury S, Cross W, Dearnaley DP, Gilbert DC, Gillessen S, Jones RJ, Langley RE, Macnair A, Malik ZI, Mason MD, Matheson DJ, Millman R, Parker CC, Rush HL, Russell JM, Au C, Ritchie AWS, Mestre RP, Ahmed I, Birtle AJ, Brock SJ, Das P, Ford VA, Gray EK, Hughes RJ, Manetta CB, McLaren DB, Nikapota AD, O'Sullivan JM, Perna C, Peedell C, Protheroe AS, Sundar S, Tanguay JS, Tolan SP, Wagstaff J, Wallace JB, Wylie JP, Zarkar A, Parmar MKB, Sydes MR. Docetaxel for Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer: Long-Term Survival Outcomes in the STAMPEDE Randomized Controlled Trial. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2022; 6:6649740. [PMID: 35877084 PMCID: PMC9338456 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkac043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Revised: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND STAMPEDE previously reported adding upfront docetaxel improved overall survival for prostate cancer patients starting long-term androgen deprivation therapy. We report long-term results for non-metastatic patients using, as primary outcome, metastatic progression-free survival (mPFS), an externally demonstrated surrogate for overall survival. METHODS Standard of care (SOC) was androgen deprivation therapy with or without radical prostate radiotherapy. A total of 460 SOC and 230 SOC plus docetaxel were randomly assigned 2:1. Standard survival methods and intention to treat were used. Treatment effect estimates were summarized from adjusted Cox regression models, switching to restricted mean survival time if non-proportional hazards. mPFS (new metastases, skeletal-related events, or prostate cancer death) had 70% power (α = 0.05) for a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.70. Secondary outcome measures included overall survival, failure-free survival (FFS), and progression-free survival (PFS: mPFS, locoregional progression). RESULTS Median follow-up was 6.5 years with 142 mPFS events on SOC (3 year and 54% increases over previous report). There was no good evidence of an advantage to SOC plus docetaxel on mPFS (HR = 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.66 to 1.19; P = .43); with 5-year mPFS 82% (95% CI = 78% to 87%) SOC plus docetaxel vs 77% (95% CI = 73% to 81%) SOC. Secondary outcomes showed evidence SOC plus docetaxel improved FFS (HR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.55 to 0.88; P = .002) and PFS (nonproportional P = .03, restricted mean survival time difference = 5.8 months, 95% CI = 0.5 to 11.2; P = .03) but no good evidence of overall survival benefit (125 SOC deaths; HR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.64 to 1.21; P = .44). There was no evidence SOC plus docetaxel increased late toxicity: post 1 year, 29% SOC and 30% SOC plus docetaxel grade 3-5 toxicity. CONCLUSIONS There is robust evidence that SOC plus docetaxel improved FFS and PFS (previously shown to increase quality-adjusted life-years), without excess late toxicity, which did not translate into benefit for longer-term outcomes. This may influence patient management in individual cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas D James
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Fiona C Ingleby
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London (UCL), Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London, UK
| | - Noel W Clarke
- The Christie and Salford Royal Hospitals, Manchester, UK
| | - Claire L Amos
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London (UCL), Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London, UK
| | | | - Christopher D Brawley
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London (UCL), Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London, UK
| | - Simon Chowdhury
- Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, UK
| | | | - David P Dearnaley
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Duncan C Gilbert
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London (UCL), Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London, UK
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Istituto Oncologico della Svizzera Italiana, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Robert J Jones
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - Ruth E Langley
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London (UCL), Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London, UK
| | - Archie Macnair
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London (UCL), Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London, UK.,Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Zafar I Malik
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Bebington, UK
| | | | - David J Matheson
- Faculty of Education, Health and Wellbeing, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Robin Millman
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London (UCL), Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London, UK
| | - Chris C Parker
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Hannah L Rush
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London (UCL), Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London, UK.,Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - J Martin Russell
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - Carly Au
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London (UCL), Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London, UK
| | - Alastair W S Ritchie
- Urology Department, Gloucestershire Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester, UK (retired)
| | - Ricardo Pereira Mestre
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland.,Institute of Oncology Research (IOR), Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | | | - Alison J Birtle
- Rosemere Cancer Centre Lancs Teaching Hospitals, Preston, UK.,University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,University of Central Lancashire (UCLan), Lancaster, UK
| | | | - Prantik Das
- University Hospitals of Derby NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Duncan B McLaren
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ashok D Nikapota
- Sussex Cancer Centre, University Hospitals Sussex, Brighton, UK.,Worthing and Southlands Hospital, Worthing, UK
| | - Joe M O'Sullivan
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Carla Perna
- Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Shaun P Tolan
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Bebington, UK
| | - John Wagstaff
- Swansea University College of Medicine & The South West Wales Cancer Centre, Swansea, UK
| | | | | | | | - Mahesh K B Parmar
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London (UCL), Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London, UK
| | - Matthew R Sydes
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London (UCL), Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Funingana I, Leung E, Alcaraz ML, Bird L, Ang J, Parkinson C, Jimenez-Linan M, Freeman S, Spencer C, Winning J, Ganesan R, Williams S, Ong K, Abedin P, Sundar S, Balega J, Brenton J. 33P The development of infrastructure for mainstream ovarian cancer genetic testing (DEMO). Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.04.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
23
|
Crabb SJ, Hussain SA, Soulis E, Hinsley S, Dempsey L, Trevethan A, Song YP, Barber J, Frew JA, Gale J, Faust G, Brock SJ, McGovern UB, Parikh O, Enting D, Sundar S, Ratnayake G, Lees K, Powles T, Jones RJ. A randomized, double blind, biomarker selected, phase II clinical trial of maintenance PARP inhibition following chemotherapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): Final analysis of the ATLANTIS rucaparib arm. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.6_suppl.436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
436 Background: A subset of mUC exhibits a DNA repair deficiency (DRD) phenotype predicting benefit from platinum based chemotherapy (PBC). We hypothesised that switch maintenance therapy with the PARP inhibitor rucaparib, in patients who have derived clinical benefit from PBC, would improve outcomes for patients with mUC harbouring a DRD biomarker. Methods: ATLANTIS is an adaptive, multi-comparison, phase II trial platform. It tests multiple biomarker selected maintenance therapies for mUC after 4 to 8 PBC cycles without disease progression. Biomarker allocation to the rucaparib comparison was based on ≥10% genomic loss of heterozygosity (%LOH) and/or somatic alteration in defined DRD associated genes ( ATM, BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, CDK12, CHEK2, FANCA, NBN, PALB2, RAD51, RAD51B, RAD51C, RAD51D, RAD54L) and/or germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 alteration. Biomarker positive patients were randomised (1:1) to maintenance rucaparib 600 mg BID PO, or matched placebo, within 10 weeks of completing PBC, until disease progression. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). Statistical analysis (data cut 17/Nov/2021) was pre-planned to target a hazard ratio of 0.5. We selected a 20% 1-sided alpha for this signal seeking phase II trial with 85.4% power (requiring 30 PFS events in 40 patients). PFS (RECIST 1.1) was compared between trial arms, by intention to treat, within a Cox model incorporating baseline minimisation factors. Adverse events (AE) were assessed by CTCAE v4.03. Results: 74 of 279 (26.5%) screened patients were biomarker positive. 40 were randomised within the rucaparib comparison (Dec 2017-Dec 2020). Biomarker positive status was by high %LOH in 22 (55%), DRD gene alteration in 11 (27.5%) and both in 7 (17.5%). Patient characteristics (median age 70.5; 82.5% male; 87.5% bladder primary; 52.5% ECOG PS 0; 62.5% prior cisplatin; 45% visceral metastases) were balanced by treatment arm. 12 (60%) and 20 (100%) PFS events have occurred in the rucaparib and placebo arms respectively (median duration follow up 94.6 weeks in those still alive). Median PFS was 35.3 weeks (80% confidence interval (CI) 11.7-35.6) with rucaparib and 15.1 weeks (80% CI 11.9-22.6) with placebo (hazard ratio 0.53, 80% CI 0.30-0.92, 1 sided p = 0.07). In the safety population (n = 39) treatment related adverse events were mostly low grade. Rucaparib was tolerable with a median duration of 10 rucaparib or 6 placebo cycles on treatment. The most frequent treatment related AEs (all grades) of fatigue (63.2% vs 30.0%, p = 0.03), nausea (36.9% vs 5.0%, p = 0.03) and rash (21.1% vs 0%, p = 0.04) were more common with rucaparib respectively. Conclusions: Maintenance rucaparib, following PBC, extended PFS in DRD biomarker selected patients with mUC and is tolerable. Further investigation of PARP inhibition for mUC is warranted. Clinical trial information: 25859465.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon J. Crabb
- Southampton Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Syed A. Hussain
- University of Sheffield and Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Eileen Soulis
- CRUK Glasgow Clinical Trials Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Samantha Hinsley
- CRUK Glasgow Clinical Trials Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Laura Dempsey
- CRUK Glasgow Clinical Trials Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Avril Trevethan
- CRUK Glasgow Clinical Trials Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Yee Pei Song
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | - John A. Frew
- Northern Centre for Cancer Care, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Joanna Gale
- Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom
| | - Guy Faust
- Leicester Royal Infirmary NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Susannah Joy Brock
- Dorset Cancer Centre, University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, United Kingdom
| | - Ursula Brigid McGovern
- University College Hospital, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Omi Parikh
- Royal Blackburn Teaching Hospital, East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackburn, United Kingdom
| | - Deborah Enting
- Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Santhanam Sundar
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - Kathryn Lees
- Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Maidstone, United Kingdom
| | | | - Robert J. Jones
- CRUK Glasgow Clinical Trials Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Sundar S. "Wrongful conception": the case for no-fault compensation. BMJ 2022; 376:o153. [PMID: 35063938 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.o153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
25
|
Sundar S, Cummins C, Kumar S, Long J, Arora V, Balega J, Broadhead T, Duncan T, Edmondson R, Fotopoulou C, Glasspool R, Kolomainen D, Leeson S, Manchanda R, McNally O, Morrison J, Mukhopadhyay A, Paul J, Tidy J, Wood N. Quality of life from cytoreductive surgery in advanced Ovarian cancer: investigating association with disease burden and surgical complexity in the international, prospective, SOCQER2 cohort study. BJOG 2021; 129:1122-1132. [PMID: 34865316 PMCID: PMC9306902 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Revised: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate quality of life (QoL) and association with surgical complexity and disease burden after surgical resection for advanced ovarian cancer in centres with variation in surgical approach DESIGN: Prospective multicentre observational study SETTING: United Kingdom, Kolkata, India, and Melbourne, Australia gynaecological cancer surgery centres. PARTICIPANTS Patients undergoing surgical resection for late stage ovarian cancer. Exposure Low, intermediate or high Surgical Complexity Score (SCS) surgery MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary: EORTC-QLQ-C30 Global score change. Secondary: EORTC OV28, progression free survival. RESULTS Patients' pre-operative disease burden and SCS varied between centres, confirming differences in surgical ethos. QoL response rates were 90% up to 18 months. Mean change from the pre-surgical baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 was 3.4 (SD 1.8, n=88) in the low, 4.0 (SD 2.1, n=55) in the intermediate and 4.3 (SD 2.1, n=52) in the high SCS group after 6 weeks (p=0.048) and 4.3 (SD 2.1, n=51), 5.1 (SD 2.2, n=41) and 5.1 (SD 2.2, n=35) respectively after 12 months (p=0.133). In a repeated measures model, there were no clinically or statistically meaningful differences in EORTC QLQ-C30 global scores between the three SCS groups, p= 0.840 but there was a small statistically significant improvement in all groups over time (p<0.001). The high SCS group experienced small to moderate decreases in physical (p=0.004), role (p=0.016) and emotional (p=0.001) function at 6 weeks post-surgery which resolved by 6-12 months. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Global QoL of patients undergoing low, intermediate, and high SCS surgery improved at 12 months post operation and was no worse in patients undergoing extensive surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Sundar
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham.,Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust
| | - C Cummins
- Institute of Applied health Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - S Kumar
- Institute of Applied health Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - J Long
- Institute of Applied health Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - V Arora
- Bondi Women's Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - J Balega
- Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust
| | - T Broadhead
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - T Duncan
- Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - S Leeson
- Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Bangor, UK
| | - R Manchanda
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London
| | - O McNally
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - J Morrison
- Taunton and Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton, UK
| | | | - J Paul
- University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - J Tidy
- University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - N Wood
- Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Sundar S, Symonds P. Reoxygenation With Fractionated Radiation Therapy in Clinical Practice. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 111:1090-1091. [PMID: 34655554 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Santhanam Sundar
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Symonds
- University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sundar S, Biggs S, Abraham M, Cook J, Watts N, Price R, Brack M, Brown N, Dixon L, Crowther O, Trenaman R, Quinn D, Hall W, Younie S. 1232 Trust-Wide Assessment of Delirium in Post-Operative Elective Surgery. Br J Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab259.138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Aim
Delirium is an acute change in cognition and associated with adverse patient outcomes. The incidence of post-operative delirium after elective non-cardiac surgery is unknown. We aimed to assess the incidence of post-operative delirium in this group and the effect on patient outcomes.
Method
Patients aged 65 and over who underwent elective non-cardiac surgery were identified on post-operative day three. Delirium screening was performed in real time using the validated 4-AT assessment tool. A retrospective review of the patients’ preoperative and perioperative record was conducted to collect demographics and identify risk factors for delirium. Outcome data was collected at 30 days. Patients with a positive delirium score (>4) underwent a more in-depth assessment and managing teams given a delirium management pack.
Results
75 (39 male) consecutive patients were screened over a period of 4 months. Median age 77 years and 18% had frailty assessed as “vulnerable”. The majority of patients (37.3%) underwent thoracic surgery, followed by hepatobiliary (17.3%), gynaecological (17.3%), colorectal (12%), maxillofacial (9.3%) and ENT (4%). 5.3% (4) of patients had a positive 4-AT screen. No patients had a formal delirium screen or diagnosis in the initial 48 hours. The median length of stay for patients with a positive screen was 8.5 days (IQR 7.5-12) compared to 8 days (IQR 5-13) for patients with a negative screen.
Conclusions
Reassuringly, rate of post-operative delirium following elective operations in our Trust are low (5%). Larger numbers of patients are required to assess the impact this has on patient outcomes and identify correlation with risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Sundar
- Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - S Biggs
- Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - M Abraham
- Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - J Cook
- Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - N Watts
- Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - R Price
- Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - M Brack
- Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - N Brown
- Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - L Dixon
- Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - O Crowther
- Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - R Trenaman
- Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - D Quinn
- Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - W Hall
- Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - S Younie
- Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Sundar S, Symonds P. In Regard to Dinh et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 111:585. [PMID: 34473985 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Santhanam Sundar
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
| | - Paul Symonds
- University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Higano C, Dizdarevic S, Sundar S, Agarwal N, Essler M, Song D, George S, Shore N, Kurtinecz M, Verholen F, Sandström P, Sartor O, George D. 593P Pain efficacy with radium-223 (Ra-223) in the REASSURE global, prospective, observational study of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.1106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
30
|
Sundar S. Changing the implied consent model for investigations is not easy. BMJ 2021; 374:n1940. [PMID: 34348925 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n1940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
31
|
Burela N, Chilukuri S, Nangia S, Patro K, Mp N, Gaikwad U, Sundar S, Thimma R, Rajendran A, Sulaiman A, Sharma D, Panda P, Jalali R. PO-1419 Toxicity outcomes of hypofractionated pencil beam scanning proton beam therapy for spinal Chordomas. Radiother Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)07870-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
32
|
Bolla M, Neven A, Maingon P, Carrie C, Boladeras A, Andreopoulos D, Engelen A, Sundar S, van der Steen-Banasik EM, Armstrong J, Peignaux-Casasnovas K, Boustani J, Herrera FG, Pieters BR, Slot A, Bahl A, Scrase CD, Azria D, Jansa J, O'Sullivan JM, Van Den Bergh ACM, Collette L. Short Androgen Suppression and Radiation Dose Escalation in Prostate Cancer: 12-Year Results of EORTC Trial 22991 in Patients With Localized Intermediate-Risk Disease. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:3022-3033. [PMID: 34310202 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.00855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) trial 22991 (NCT00021450) showed that 6 months of concomitant and adjuvant androgen suppression (AS) improves event- (EFS, Phoenix) and clinical disease-free survival (DFS) of intermediate- and high-risk localized prostatic carcinoma, treated by external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) at 70-78 Gy. We report the long-term results in intermediate-risk patients treated with 74 or 78 Gy EBRT, as per current guidelines. PATIENT AND METHODS Of 819 patients randomly assigned between EBRT or EBRT plus AS started on day 1 of EBRT, 481 entered with intermediate risk (International Union Against Cancer TNM 1997 cT1b-c or T2a with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥ 10 ng/mL or Gleason ≤ 7 and PSA ≤ 20 ng/mL, N0M0) and had EBRT planned at 74 (342 patients, 71.1%) or 78 Gy (139 patients, 28.9%). We report the trial primary end point EFS, DFS, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) by intention-to-treat stratified by EBRT dose at two-sided α = 5%. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 12.2 years, 92 of 245 patients and 132 of 236 had EFS events in the EBRT plus AS and EBRT arm, respectively, mostly PSA relapse (48.7%) or death (45.1%). EBRT plus AS improved EFS and DFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.53; CI, 0.41 to 0.70; P < .001 and HR = 0.67; CI, 0.49 to 0.90; P = .008). At 10 years, DMFS was 79.3% (CI, 73.4 to 84.0) with EBRT plus AS and 72.7% (CI, 66.2 to 78.2) with EBRT (HR = 0.74; CI, 0.53 to 1.02; P = .065). With 140 deaths (EBRT plus AS: 64; EBRT: 76), 10-year OS was 80.0% (CI, 74.1 to 84.7) with EBRT plus AS and 74.3% (CI, 67.8 to 79.7) with EBRT, but not statistically significantly different (HR = 0.74; CI, 0.53 to 1.04; P = .082). CONCLUSION Six months of concomitant and adjuvant AS statistically significantly improves EFS and DFS in intermediate-risk prostatic carcinoma, treated by irradiation at 74 or 78 Gy. The effects on OS and DMFS did not reach statistical significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michel Bolla
- Radiotherapy Department Grenoble, Grenoble Alpes University, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble, France
| | - Anouk Neven
- European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Philippe Maingon
- Sorbonne University, APHP Sorbonne University, La Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | | | - Ana Boladeras
- Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology-University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | | | | | - Santhanam Sundar
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust-City Hospital, Consultant Medical Oncologist, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - John Armstrong
- Radiation Oncology Department, All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, St Luke's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Jihane Boustani
- Radiotherapy Department, University Hospital of Besancon-Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France
| | - Fernanda G Herrera
- Radiation Oncology and Immuno-Oncology Service, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Bradley R Pieters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers/University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Annerie Slot
- Radiotherapeutisch Instituut Friesland, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - Amit Bahl
- University Hospitals Bristol National Health Service Foundation Trust-Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol Avon, United Kingdom
| | | | - David Azria
- Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Montpellier, France
| | - Jan Jansa
- Klinika Onkologie a Radioterapie-Fakultni nemocnice Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
| | - Joe M O'Sullivan
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Ireland
| | - Alphonsus C M Van Den Bergh
- Radiotherapy Department, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Laurence Collette
- European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Affiliation(s)
- Santhanam Sundar
- Santhanam Sundar, MD, and Micheal Ocathail, MD, Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Micheal Ocathail
- Santhanam Sundar, MD, and Micheal Ocathail, MD, Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Sundar S, Symonds P. Prostate ultra-radical radiotherapy: reinventing the wheel. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:e223. [PMID: 34087133 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00185-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Santhanam Sundar
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK.
| | - Paul Symonds
- Department of Oncology, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Sundar S, Symonds P. Re: Syed A. Hussain, Nuria Porta, Emma Hall, et al. Outcomes in Patients with Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by (Chemo)radiotherapy in the BC2001 Trial. Eur Urol 2021;79:307-15. Eur Urol 2021; 80:e49-e50. [PMID: 34024651 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paul Symonds
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Ewies A, Ahmed I, Al-Azzawi F, Pitkin J, Gupta P, Persic M, Sahu B, Elgobashy A, Barraclough L, Woodman J, Babrah J, Bowden S, Stocken D, Billingham L, Sundar S, Rea D. Folic acid supplementation in postmenopausal women with hot flushes: phase III randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial. BJOG 2021; 128:2024-2033. [PMID: 33982872 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Revised: 12/30/2020] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess whether folic acid supplementation ameliorates hot flushes. DESIGN Double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial. SETTING Nine hospitals in England. POPULATION Postmenopausal women experiencing ≥50 hot flushes weekly. METHODS Women (n = 164) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive folic acid 5 mg tablet or placebo daily for 12 weeks. Participants recorded frequency and severity of hot flushes in a Sloan Diary daily and completed Greene Climacteric and Utian Quality of Life (UQoL) Scales at 4-week intervals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The change in daily Hot Flush Score at week 12 from randomisation based on Sloan Diary Composite Score B calculation. RESULTS Data of 143 (87%) women were available for the primary outcome. The mean change (SD) in Hot Flush Score at week 12 was -6.98 (10.30) and -4.57 (9.46) for folic acid and placebo group, respectively. The difference between groups in the mean change was -2.41 (95% CI -5.68 to 0.87) (P = 0.149) and in the adjusted mean change -2.61 (95% CI -5.72 to 0.49) (P = 0.098). Analysis of secondary outcomes indicated an increased benefit in the folic acid group regarding changes in total and emotional UQoL scores at week 8 when compared with placebo. The difference in the mean change from baseline was 5.22 (95% CI 1.16-9.28) and 1.88 (95% CI 0.23-3.52) for total and emotional score, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The study was not able to demonstrate that folic acid had a statistically significant greater benefit in reducing Hot Flush Score over 12 weeks in postmenopausal women when compared with placebo. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT Folic acid may ameliorate hot flushes in postmenopausal women but confirmation is required from a larger study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaa Ewies
- Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.,Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - I Ahmed
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - F Al-Azzawi
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - J Pitkin
- London Northwest University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, UK.,Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - P Gupta
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - M Persic
- University Hospital of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
| | - B Sahu
- Princess Royal Hospital, Shrewsbury and Telford NHS Trust, Shrewsbury, UK
| | - A Elgobashy
- The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK
| | | | - J Woodman
- University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK
| | - J Babrah
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - S Bowden
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - D Stocken
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - L Billingham
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - S Sundar
- Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.,Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - D Rea
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,University Hospitals of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Affiliation(s)
- Santhanam Sundar
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Sundar S. Misconceptions about CPR distress patients at the end of life and bereaved people. BMJ 2021; 373:n1060. [PMID: 33910881 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n1060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Santhanam Sundar
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Albuquerque LG, de Oliveira Roque F, Valente-Neto F, Koroiva R, Buss DF, Baptista DF, Hepp LU, Kuhlmann ML, Sundar S, Covich AP, Pinto JOP. Large-scale prediction of tropical stream water quality using Rough Sets Theory. ECOL INFORM 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
40
|
Crabb SJ, Griffiths G, Marwood E, Dunkley D, Downs N, Martin K, Light M, Northey J, Wilding S, Whitehead A, Shaw E, Birtle AJ, Bahl A, Elliott T, Westbury C, Sundar S, Robinson A, Jagdev S, Kumar S, Rooney C, Salinas-Souza C, Stephens C, Khoo V, Jones RJ. Pan-AKT Inhibitor Capivasertib With Docetaxel and Prednisolone in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Trial (ProCAID). J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:190-201. [PMID: 33326257 PMCID: PMC8078455 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.01576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Revised: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Capivasertib is a pan-AKT inhibitor. Preclinical data indicate activity in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and synergism with docetaxel. PATIENTS AND METHODS ProCAID was a placebo controlled randomized phase II trial in mCRPC. Patients received up to ten 21-day cycles of docetaxel (75 mg/m2 intravenous, day 1) and prednisolone (5 mg twice daily, oral, day 1-21) and were randomly assigned (1:1) to oral capivasertib (320 mg twice daily, 4 days on/3 days off, from day 2 each cycle), or placebo, until disease progression. Treatment allocation used minimization factors: bone metastases; visceral metastases; investigational site; and prior abiraterone or enzalutamide. The primary objective, by intention to treat, determined if the addition of capivasertib prolonged a composite progression-free survival (cPFS) end point that included prostate-specific antigen progression events. cPFS and overall survival (OS) were also assessed by composite biomarker subgroup for PI3K/AKT/PTEN pathway activation status. RESULTS One hundred and fifty patients were enrolled. Median cPFS was 7.03 (95% CI, 6.28 to 8.25) and 6.70 months (95% CI, 5.52 to 7.36) with capivasertib and placebo respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 80% CI, 0.73 to 1.16; one-sided P = .32). Median OS was 31.15 (95% CI, 20.07 to not reached) and 20.27 months (95% CI, 17.51 to 24.18), respectively (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.88; two-sided P = .01). cPFS and OS results were consistent irrespective of PI3K/AKT/PTEN pathway activation status. Grade III-IV adverse events were equivalent between arms (62.2%). The most common adverse events of any grade deemed related to capivasertib were diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, and rash. CONCLUSION The addition of capivasertib to chemotherapy did not extend cPFS in mCRPC irrespective of PI3K/AKT/PTEN pathway activation status. The observed OS result (a secondary end point) will require prospective validation in future studies to address potential for bias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon J. Crabb
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
- Southampton Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Gareth Griffiths
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Ellice Marwood
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Denise Dunkley
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
- Southampton Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Nichola Downs
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Karen Martin
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Michelle Light
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Josh Northey
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Sam Wilding
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Amy Whitehead
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Emily Shaw
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Alison J. Birtle
- Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Amit Bahl
- Bristol Oncology and Haematology Centre, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Tony Elliott
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | - Santhanam Sundar
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Claire Rooney
- Translational Medicine, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | - Christine Stephens
- Early Oncology Clinical, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Vincent Khoo
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Robert J. Jones
- University of Glasgow, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
|
42
|
Fizazi K, Drake CG, Beer TM, Kwon ED, Scher HI, Gerritsen WR, Bossi A, den Eertwegh AJMV, Krainer M, Houede N, Santos R, Mahammedi H, Ng S, Danielli R, Franke FA, Sundar S, Agarwal N, Bergman AM, Ciuleanu TE, Korbenfeld E, Sengeløv L, Hansen S, McHenry MB, Chen A, Logothetis C. Final Analysis of the Ipilimumab Versus Placebo Following Radiotherapy Phase III Trial in Postdocetaxel Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Identifies an Excess of Long-term Survivors. Eur Urol 2020; 78:822-830. [PMID: 32811715 PMCID: PMC8428575 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.07.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The phase 3 trial CA184-043 evaluated radiotherapy to bone metastases followed by Ipilimumab or placebo in men with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who had received docetaxel previously. In a prior analysis, the trial's primary endpoint (overall survival [OS]) was not improved significantly. OBJECTIVE To report the final analysis of OS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A total of 799 patients were randomized to receive a single dose of radiotherapy to one or more bone metastases followed by either Ipilimumab (n = 399) or placebo (n = 400). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OS was analyzed in the intention-to-treat population. Prespecified and exploratory subset analyses based on Kaplan-Meier/Cox methodology were performed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS During an additional follow-up of approximately 2.4 yr since the primary analysis, 721/799 patients have died. Survival analysis showed crossing of the curves at 7-8 mo, followed by persistent separation of the curves beyond that point, favoring the ipilimumab arm. Given the lack of proportional hazards, a piecewise hazard model showed that the hazard ratio (HR) changed over time: the HR was 1.49 (95% confidence interval 1.12, 1.99) for 0-5 mo, 0.66 (0.51, 0.86) for 5-12 mo, and 0.66 (0.52, 0.84) beyond 12 mo. OS rates were higher in the ipilimumab versus placebo arms at 2 yr (25.2% vs 16.6%), 3 yr (15.3% vs 7.9%), 4 yr (10.1% vs 3.3%), and 5 yr (7.9% vs. 2.7%). Disease progression was the most frequent cause of death in both arms. In seven patients (1.8%) in the ipilimumab arm and one (0.3%) in the placebo arm, the primary cause of death was reported as study drug toxicity. No long-term safety signals were identified. CONCLUSIONS In this preplanned long-term analysis, OS favored ipilimumab plus radiotherapy versus placebo plus radiotherapy for patients with postdocetaxel mCRPC. OS rates at 3, 4, and 5 yr were approximately two to three times higher in the ipilimumab arm. PATIENT SUMMARY After longer follow-up, survival favored the group of men who received ipilimumab, with overall survival rates being two to three times higher at 3 yr and beyond.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karim Fizazi
- Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Sud, Villejuif, France.
| | - Charles G Drake
- Columbia University Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tomasz M Beer
- Oregon Health & Science University Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Howard I Scher
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weill-Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Nadine Houede
- CHU of Nimes, Nimes, France; Montpellier University, Montpellier, France
| | | | | | - Siobhan Ng
- St John Of God Hospital, Subiaco, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - André M Bergman
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute and Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Lisa Sengeløv
- Herlev Hospital, Region Hovedstadens Apotek, Herlev, Denmark
| | | | | | - Allen Chen
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Wallingford, CT, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Davies J, Sundar S. Albumin lymphocyte index is a better predictor of overall survival than neutrophil lymphocyte ratio in bladder cancer patients treated by radical radiotherapy. EUR UROL SUPPL 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s2666-1683(20)36266-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
44
|
Tonse R, Chilikuri S, Nangia S, Gaikwad U, Burela N, Sundar S, MP N, Patro K, Thiyagarajan R, Arjuna M, KC G, Wakde M, Panda P, Kumar R, Adhityan R, Sulaiman A, Patil S, Shamurailatpam D, Jalali R. Intensity Modulated Proton Beam Therapy (IMPT) in CNS and Skull Base Tumors: Prospective Data of 50 Patients With Early Clinical Follow-Up And Patient Reported Outcomes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.07.2028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
45
|
Affiliation(s)
- Santhanam Sundar
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Affiliation(s)
- Santhanam Sundar
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Affiliation(s)
- Santhanam Sundar
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Clamp A, James E, McNeish I, Dean A, Kim JW, O'Donnell D, Hook J, Gallardo-Rincon D, Coyle C, Blagden S, Brenton J, Naik R, Perren T, Sundar S, Cook A, Badrock J, Swart A, Parmar M, Kaplan R, Ledermann J. 805O ICON8: Overall survival results in a GCIG phase III randomised controlled trial of weekly dose-dense chemotherapy in first line epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal carcinoma treatment. Ann Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|
49
|
Sundar S. Covid-19 risk assessment: a futile metaphorical strip search. BMJ 2020; 370:m3251. [PMID: 32847801 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m3251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Santhanam Sundar
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Crabb SJ, Griffiths GO, Marwood E, Dunkley D, Downs N, Martin K, Light M, Northey J, Whitehead A, Shaw EC, Birtle AJ, Bahl A, Elliott T, Westbury C, Sundar S, Robinson A, Jagdev S, Kumar S, Khoo V, Jones RJ. ProCAID: A randomized double-blind phase II clinical trial of capivasertib (C) in combination with docetaxel and prednisolone chemotherapy (DP) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.5520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
5520 Background: DP extends survival in mCRPC, but clinical benefit is modest. PI3K/AKT/PTEN pathway activation is common in mCRPC contributing to disease progression and DP resistance. C is a pan-AKT inhibitor. Pre-clinical data indicate activity in prostate cancer and synergism with DP. This phase II trial combined C with DP in mCRPC. Methods: Key eligibility criteria: histologically or cytologically proven measurable or evaluable mCRPC, suitable for treatment with DP for PSA and/or radiographic disease progression, ECOG performance status 0-1, no prior chemotherapy for mCRPC, not requiring insulin or > 2 oral hypoglycaemic drugs for diabetes mellitus. Treatment: up to 10 cycles of DP (D: 75 mg/m2 IV, day 1; P: 5 mg bd oral, day 1 – 21) and random assignment (1:1, double blind) to oral C (320 mg twice daily, 4 days on/3 days off, from cycle 1, day 2) or matched placebo to disease progression. Primary endpoint: progression free survival (PFS; comprising PSA, radiographic or clinical progression, new cancer therapy or death; PCWG2 criteria) in the intent to treat (ITT) population. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and safety. PFS and OS were also assessed by composite biomarker (B) subgroup for PI3K/AKT/PTEN pathway activation status (NGS/IHC on archival tumour, contemporaneous ctDNA). Statistics: designed to detect a 50% increase in median PFS (6 to 9 months (mo)) between the placebo and C arms (90% power, 20% 1-sided alpha) by Cox proportional hazards model. Registration: ISRCTN 69139368. Results: 150 patients were randomised to 01/2019. Median follow up 16.77 months (IQR 12.0-26.5). PFS and OS by ITT and B status, are shown in the table (NR, not reached; CI confidence interval). Grade 3–4 adverse events (AE) were equally common between arms (62.2%). The most common AEs were diarrhoea, fatigue and nausea. Conclusions: Adding C to DP did not extend PFS. The OS secondary endpoint was significantly increased. PFS and OS results were consistent irrespective of PI3K/AKT/PTEN pathway activation status. Clinical trial information: 69139368 . [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon J. Crabb
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust and Southampton Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Gareth Owen Griffiths
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Ellice Marwood
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Denise Dunkley
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust and Southampton Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Nichola Downs
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Karen Martin
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Michelle Light
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Josh Northey
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Amy Whitehead
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Emily C Shaw
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Alison Jane Birtle
- Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Amit Bahl
- Bristol Oncology and Haematology Centre, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Tony Elliott
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | - Santhanam Sundar
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Vincent Khoo
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Robert J. Jones
- The Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|