Exercise improves metformin 72-h glucose control by reducing the frequency of hyperglycemic peaks

PURPOSE

To determine the separated and combined effects of metformin and exercise on insulin sensitivity and free-living glycemic control in overweight individuals with prediabetes/type 2 diabetes (T2DM).

METHODS

We recruited 16 adults with BMI of 32.7 ± 4.3 kg m^-2 and insulin resistance (HOMA-IR 3.2 ± 0.4) under chronic metformin treatment (1234 ± 465 g day^-1) enrolled in a high-intensity interval training (HIIT) program. Participants underwent four 72-h experimental trials in a random-counterbalanced order: (1) maintaining their habitual metformin treatment (MET); (2) replacing metformin treatment by placebo (CON); (3) placebo plus two HIIT sessions (EX + CON), and (4) metformin plus two HIIT sessions (MET + EX). We used intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) during 72 h in every trial to obtain interstitial fluid glucose area under the curve (IFG_AUC) and the percentage of measurements over 180 mg dL^-1 (% IFG_PEAKS). Insulin sensitivity was assessed on the last day of each trial with HOMA-IR index and calculated insulin sensitivity (C_SI) from intravenous glucose tolerance test.

RESULTS

IFG_AUC was lower in MET + EX and MET than in CON (P = 0.011 and P = 0.025, respectively). In addition, IFG_AUC was lower in MET + EX than in EX + CON (P = 0.044). %IFG_PEAKS were only lower in MET + EX in relation to CON (P = 0.028). HOMA-IR and C_SI were higher in CON in comparison with MET + EX (P = 0.011 and P = 0.022, respectively) and MET (P = 0.006 and P < 0.001, respectively). IFG_AUC showed a significant correlation with HOMA-IR.

CONCLUSION

Intense aerobic exercise in patients with diabetes and prediabetes under metformin treatment reduces free-living 72-h blood hyperglycemic peaks. This may help to prevent the development of cardiovascular complications associated with diabetes.

Weight loss but not gains in cardiorespiratory fitness after exercise-training predicts improved health risk factors in metabolic syndrome

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

To examine the relationship between changes in cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF; estimated by VO₂max) and metabolic syndrome (MetS) after an exercise training intervention to confirm/contradict the high association found in cross-sectional observational studies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

MetS individuals (54 ± 8 yrs old; BMI of 32 ± 5) were randomly allocated (6:1 ratio) to a group that exercised trained for 16-weeks (EXER; n = 138) or a control sedentary group (CONT; n = 22). At baseline, MetS components, body composition and exercise responses were similar between groups (all P > 0.05). After 16 weeks of intervention, only EXER reduced body weight, waist circumference (-1.21 ± 0.22 kg and -2.7 ± 0.3 cm; P < 0.001), mean arterial blood pressure and hence the composite MetS Z-score (-7.06 ± 0.77 mmHg and -0.21 ± 0.03 SD; P < 0.001). In the EXER group, CRF increased by 16% (0.302 ± 0.026, 95% CI 0.346 to 0.259 LO₂·min^-1; P < 0.001) but was not a significant predictor of MetS Z-score improvements (r = -0.231; β = -0.024; P = 0.788). Instead, body weight reductions predicted 25% of MetS Z-score changes (r = 0.508; β = 0.360; P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In MetS individuals, the exercise-training increases in CRF are not predictive of the improvements in their health risk factors. Instead, body weight loss (<2%) was a significant contributor to the improved MetS Z-score and thus should be emphasized in exercise training programs. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03019796.

Effects of intense aerobic exercise and/or antihypertensive medication in individuals with metabolic syndrome

We studied the blood pressure lowering effects of a bout of exercise and/or antihypertensive medicine with the goal of studying if exercise could substitute or enhance pharmacologic hypertension treatment. Twenty-three hypertensive metabolic syndrome patients chronically medicated with angiotensin II receptor 1 blockade antihypertensive medicine underwent 24-hr monitoring in four separated days in a randomized order; (a) after taking their habitual dose of antihypertensive medicine (AHM trial), (b) substituting their medicine by placebo medicine (PLAC trial), (c) placebo medicine with a morning bout of intense aerobic exercise (PLAC+EXER trial) and (d) combining the exercise and antihypertensive medicine (AHM+EXER trial). We found that in trials with AHM subjects had lower plasma aldosterone/renin activity ratio evidencing treatment compliance. Before exercise, the trials with AHM displayed lower systolic (130 ± 16 vs 133 ± 15 mm Hg; P = .018) and mean blood pressures (94 ± 11 vs 96 ± 10 mm Hg; P = .036) than trials with placebo medication. Acutely (ie, 30 min after treatments) combining AHM+EXER lowered systolic blood pressure (SBP) below the effects of PLAC+EXER (-8.1 ± 1.6 vs -4.9 ± 1.5 mm Hg; P = .015). Twenty-four hour monitoring revealed no differences among trials in body motion. However, PLAC+EXER and AHM lowered SBP below PLAC during the first 10 hours, time at which PLAC+EXER effects faded out (ie, at 19 PM). Adding exercise to medication (ie, AHM+EXER) resulted in longer reductions in SBP than with exercise alone (PLAC+EXER). In summary, one bout of intense aerobic exercise in the morning cannot substitute the long-lasting effects of antihypertensive medicine in lowering blood pressure, but their combination is superior to exercise alone.

Effects of Simultaneous or Sequential Weight Loss Diet and Aerobic Interval Training on Metabolic Syndrome

Our purpose in this study was to investigate efficient and sustainable combinations of exercise and diet-induced weight loss (DIET), in order to combat obesity in metabolic syndrome (MetS) patients. We examined the impact of aerobic interval training (AIT), followed by or concurrent to a DIET on MetS components. 36 MetS patients (54±9 years old; 33±4 BMI; 27 males and 9 females) underwent 16 weeks of AIT followed by another 16 weeks without exercise from the fall of 2013 to the spring of 2014. Participants were randomized to AIT without DIET (E CON, n=12), AIT followed by DIET (E-then-D, n=12) or AIT concurrent with DIET (E+D, n=12) groups. Body weight decreased below E CON similarly in the E-then-D and E+D groups (~5%). Training improved blood pressure and cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2peak) in all groups with no additional effect of concurrent weight loss. However, E+D improved insulin sensitivity (HOMA) and lowered plasma triglycerides and blood cholesterol below E CON and E-then-D (all P<0.05). Weight loss in E-then-D in the 16 weeks without exercise lowered HOMA to the E+D levels and maintained blood pressure at trained levels. Our data suggest that a new lifestyle combination consisting of aerobic interval training followed by weight loss diet is similar, or even more effective on improving metabolic syndrome factors than concurrent exercise plus diet.