Predictors of hospital discharge and mortality in patients with diabetes and COVID-19: updated results from the nationwide CORONADO study

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

This is an update of the results from the previous report of the CORONADO (Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 and Diabetes Outcomes) study, which aims to describe the outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with diabetes hospitalised for coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19).

METHODS

The CORONADO initiative is a French nationwide multicentre study of patients with diabetes hospitalised for COVID-19 with a 28-day follow-up. The patients were screened after hospital admission from 10 March to 10 April 2020. We mainly focused on hospital discharge and death within 28 days.

RESULTS

We included 2796 participants: 63.7% men, mean age 69.7 ± 13.2 years, median BMI (25th-75th percentile) 28.4 (25.0-32.4) kg/m². Microvascular and macrovascular diabetic complications were found in 44.2% and 38.6% of participants, respectively. Within 28 days, 1404 (50.2%; 95% CI 48.3%, 52.1%) were discharged from hospital with a median duration of hospital stay of 9 (5-14) days, while 577 participants died (20.6%; 95% CI 19.2%, 22.2%). In multivariable models, younger age, routine metformin therapy and longer symptom duration on admission were positively associated with discharge. History of microvascular complications, anticoagulant routine therapy, dyspnoea on admission, and higher aspartate aminotransferase, white cell count and C-reactive protein levels were associated with a reduced chance of discharge. Factors associated with death within 28 days mirrored those associated with discharge, and also included routine treatment by insulin and statin as deleterious factors.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

In patients with diabetes hospitalised for COVID-19, we established prognostic factors for hospital discharge and death that could help clinicians in this pandemic period.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04324736.

Are we turning to more than a first line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer with high dose irinotecan?: A monocentric institution safety analysis of 46 patients

PURPOSE

Irinotecan (CPT11) at 180 mg/m(2) with LV5FU2 for metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) has response rates (RRs) of 56 and 4% as first- and second-line treatments, respectively [1-2], and higher doses of CPT11 result in higher RRs. The present cohort analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of increasing doses of this combination treatment in clinical practice.

METHODS

Chemo-naive and pretreated patients with MCRC received CPT11 and LV5FU2 (5FU 48-h CI 2400 mg/m(2), D1 bolus leucovorin 200 mg/m(2)), followed by 5FU 400 mg/m(2) (cycles d1-d15). CPT11 dose was increased by 20 mg/m(2) at each cycle, from 180 mg/m(2) up to 260 mg/m(2), unless grade 3 toxicities other than alopecia arose.

RESULTS

Between March 2002 and September 2005, 46 patients were recruited (median age: 62.3 years). A total of 512 cycles of chemotherapy were administered (median: 9 cycles/patient; range: 3-41). Median follow-up was 16.2 months. Altogether, 27 patients had received prior chemotherapy: 24 with an oxaliplatin-based regimen; seven with CPT11; and five with LV5FU2 or oral 5FU. Doses of 260 mg/m(2) were used in 17 patients, 240 mg/m(2) in seven, 220 mg/m(2) in six and 200 mg/m(2) in five, while 11 remained at 180 mg/m(2); 121 cycles used 260 mg/m(2) (24%), with 76 cycles at 240 mg/m(2) (14%), 78 cycles at 220 mg/m(2) and 58 cycles at 200mg/m(2). The objective response (OR) was 40%, with stable disease (SD) in 45% and disease progression (DP) in 11%. In the first-line therapy group, partial/complete responses were 55%, with SD in 30% and DP in 15%. In pretreated patients, OR was 30.5%, SD was 58.5% and DP was 11%. Nine patients (20%) had a therapeutic break (median: 5.1 months; range: 3-10). Overall median survival was 17 months, with 16.5 months in pretreated patients and 19.6 months in the first-line group. Toxicity grades 3-4 and overall incidence per cycle were: neutropenia, 3-22%; diarrhea, 4-22%; vomiting, 2-20%; alopecia, 20-26%; anemia, 0.2-2%; thrombocytopenia, 0-0%; and mucositis, 0.4-2.2%.

CONCLUSION

The toxicity of high-dose CPT11+LV5FU2 chemotherapy was well tolerated when the dose was progressively increased according to individual tolerability, with 37% of patients receiving CPT11 at 260 mg/m(2). Progression-free survival (PFS) increased with higher doses of CPT11. In the chemo-naive and pretreated subgroups, the median PFS was 10.9 and 8.8 months, respectively (P=0.698, NS). Optimization of CPT11 doses in pretreated patients appears to pave the way for new treatment options.

[Conservative treatment of anal canal carcinoma with external radiotherapy and interstitial brachytherapy, with or without chemotherapy: long-term results]

PURPOSE

A retrospective analysis of conservative treatment of anal canal cancers with external radiation therapy and interstitial brachytherapy with or without chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1986 to 1996, 69 patients were treated with external radiotherapy (40 Gy/20 fractions) and interstitial brachytherapy (20 Gy) after a mean interval of six weeks for a localized epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal. Patients who did not complete the whole therapeutic sequence were not included. Forty-five patients received additional 5-fluorouracil- and/or mitomycin C-based chemotherapy regimen.

RESULTS

Acute toxicity was acceptable. Complete response rate was 81%. Actuarial local control rate was at two and five years, 65% and 59% respectively (median follow-up: eight years). At two, five and ten years, actuarial colostomy rate was 26%, 33% and 33% respectively, and colostomy-free survival rates 61%, 47% and 37%. Overall survival at two, five and ten years was 81%, 65% and 53% respectively. Distant metastases occurred in 11 patients (16%). Prognostic factors for overall survival were performance status (PS) (79% survival at five years for patients with PS 0 versus 50% for patients with PS 1-3, P = 0.04) and tumor stage (80% at five years for T1-T2 versus 53% for T3-T4, P = 0.03). Overall treatment time less than 12 weeks and time interval between external radiotherapy and brachytherapy inferior than six weeks were associated with a better local control (P = 0.05). In multivariate analysis, these prognostic factors were not significant.

CONCLUSION

These results confirm the efficacy of external radiotherapy and brachytherapy in the treatment of small anal canal cancers, and point out the need for improving treatment outcome of larger tumors.

Differential effects of fosinopril and enalapril in patients with mild to moderate chronic heart failure. Fosinopril in Heart Failure Study Investigators

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficacy and safety of fosinopril in the treatment of chronic heart failure (CHF), patients with mild to moderate CHF and left ventricular ejection fractions <40% were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to receive fosinopril 5 to 20 mg every day (n = 122) or enalapril 5 to 20 mg every day (n = 132) for 1 year.

RESULTS

The event-free survival time was longer (1.6 vs 1.0 months, P= .032) and the total rate of hospitalizations plus deaths was smaller with fosinopril than with enalapril (19.7% vs 25.0%, P= .028). There was consistently better symptom improvement with fosinopril (P< .05). The incidence of orthostatic hypotension was lower in the fosinopril group (1.6% vs 7.6%, P< .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Fosinopril 5 to 20 mg every day was more effective in improving symptoms and delaying events related to worsening of CHF and produced less orthostatic hypotension than enalapril 5 to 20 mg every day.

Management of hypertension: the role of combination therapy

The complementary action of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and diuretics in the treatment of hypertension has been demonstrated in a number of studies of fosinopril and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ). The combination provides a clinically significant reduction in blood pressure while minimizing the dose-dependent adverse effects of HCTZ, such as hypotension and its metabolic effects on plasma lipoproteins, by keeping the dose of each agent to the minimum. Fosinopril has a unique dual mechanism of elimination and can therefore be used in patients with renal impairment. The efficacy of the combination of fosinopril and hydrochlorothiazide compared with placebo and other agents is reviewed in this article. Studies have demonstrated that the combination is effective in the elderly and in renally impaired patients, regardless of severity. In addition, in non-insulin dependent diabetes, antihypertensive effect is achieved without further affecting carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, which is often the case when thiazide diuretics alone are used. A matrix study was performed to evaluate the optimum dose combination to produce blood pressure normalization and minimize side effects. This study evaluated 17 different dose combinations and demonstrated that the lowest dose combination to produce a clinically significant effect was fosinopril 10 mg and HCTZ 12.5 mg. However, a dose-related antihypertensive effect can be seen, giving the option for the use of 20 mg fosinopril for moderately hypertensive patients. Both combination therapy and fosinopril were significantly more effective than HCTZ alone or placebo. The fosinopril/HCTZ combination has also been shown to have a comparable effect to sustained-release nifedipine and propanolol + HCTZ. The studies reviewed here demonstrate that fosinopril/HCTZ combination treatment has a number of advantages over either agent used alone, providing blood pressure normalization in a broad range of hypertensive patients, including diabetic patients and the elderly.

Postmenopausal patients with node-positive resectable breast cancer. Tamoxifen vs FEC 50 (6 cycles) vs FEC 50 (6 cycles) plus tamoxifen vs control--preliminary results of a 4-arm randomised trial. The French Adjuvant Study Group

In 1986 the true benefit of adjuvant medical treatment in postmenopausal patients with pathological node-positive breast adenocarcinoma was still controversial. The French Adjuvant Study Group (FASG) initiated a randomised trial to elucidate the respective roles of adjuvant chemo-and/or hormonotherapy in this group of patients. Of the 776 patients who have been included between 1986 and 1990, 741 were fully eligible for evaluation. Inclusion criteria were postmenopausal patients aged between 50 and 70 years with adenocarcinoma of the breast, positive pathological nodes and no distant metastasis. Patients were randomised to 1 of 4 treatment arms: Group A (n = 192) received tamoxifen 30 mg/day orally for 3 years; Group B (n = 183) received FEC 50 (fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 50 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2) for 6 cycles; Group C (n = 182) received tamoxifen 30 mg/day orally for 3 years plus FEC 50 for 6 cycles; Group D (n = 184) received no medical adjuvant treatment. Surgery was either modified radical mastectomy (n = 363) or tumorectomy (n = 378), and postoperative irradiation was given to all patients. All major prognostic factors were well balanced between the 4 patient groups. Toxicity was evaluated in 348 patients in Groups B and C who received a total of 1983 chemotherapy cycles. Median epirubicin dose intensity (mg/m2/week) was 15.8 in Group B and 15.7 in Group C. Grade 3 to 4 neutropenia was observed in 4.7% of cycles for Group B and 3.7% for Group C. Grade 3 to 4 nausea/vomiting were seen in 18% of treatment cycles in Group B and 15% in Group C.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[Methodology of phase II clinical trials of hypocholesteremic drugs: which criteria?]

Phase II is crucial in drug trials: during this period the first patients are exposed to the drug and the results influence the continuation of the development and the success of later trials. This stage is fundamental in lipid lowering drugs considering the costs of development and potential benefits for public health. The choice of pertinent criteria for the design of a lipid lowering drug trial depends on the analysis of data acquired during previous large scale trials. These criteria should demonstrate the potential of the tested drug and the best conditions of its administration. It is especially at this stage that the drug dosage optimising the efficacy/tolerance ratio should be determined. Analysis of large scale prevention trials indicates LDL-cholesterol as the principal criterion. It is related to coronary risk in the major trials of lipid lowering drugs. A reduction of LDL-cholesterol gives a good numerical estimate of the expected reduction of cardiovascular risk. It is then possible to formulate the hypotheses required for the design of these trials, in particular to calculate the size of the treatment group required. The total cholesterol should also be measured above all because of the large amount of data correlating it with cardiovascular risk. The HDL-cholesterol and triglycerides should also be taken into account even though some of the data concerning these parameters is controversial. The discrimination obtained by measuring HDL-cholesterol is without any doubt crude, and future criteria should enable more accurate and rapid evaluation of lipid lowering activity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Influence of training on blood lipids and coagulation

Even if the effects of physical training on secondary prevention are controversial, it is known that exercise may influence several of the risk factors for coronary heart disease (CHD). One of the most important is cholesterol. Studies conducted to determine the influence of training on lipid profile have shown in normals, as well as in CHD patients, a favourable influence: a small decrease in total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and an increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. These results are obtained after prolonged and intensive training. The influence of training on coagulation is more controversial and less well known. During short bouts of exercise the following changes are generally observed: an increase in platelet count and platelet aggregation (the effects on platelet adhesiveness and activation are controversial), potentiation of coagulation with an increase in factor VIII, and an increase in fibrinolytic activity due to an increase in plasminogen activator level. The effects of training have been less well studied. It is supposed that training could diminish the clotting potentiation observed during short exercise. Fibrinolysis is also increased in these conditions. If the influence of training on blood lipid profile may be considered as favourable in secondary prevention, no study has yet assessed the role of training on coagulation factors in secondary prevention.

Prognostic significance of angina pectoris recurring soon after myocardial infarction

The prognostic significance of an early occurrence, or recurrence, of angina pectoris after myocardial infarction was studied in 254 patients (221 male, 33 female; mean age 58 +/- 11 years). During the in-hospital rehabilitation program, 41 patients (16%) had anginal pain. The mean follow-up was 21 months (range 12-33 months). Among the 254 patients, 21 died, five had recurrent myocardial infarction, 13 had unstable angina, and 22 underwent aortocoronary bypass surgery. An early recurrence of angina pectoris was predictive of combined (medical + surgical) events (21 patients, P less than 0.05), medical events (11 patients, P less than 0.05) and surgical events (10 patients, P less than 0.001), but failed to predict individual death (six patients), recurrent myocardial infarction (two patients) or unstable angina (three patients). Of the events that occurred in the 254 patients, 34% were predicted by the early recurrence of angina pectoris. Early post-infarction angina was observed more frequently in older patients and patients with previous history of angina pectoris. This represents an important prognostic factor after myocardial infarction, which defines a high-risk group of patients requiring further investigation and appropriate therapeutic approaches.