Incidence, clinical impact and treatment outcomes of valve thrombosis after transcatheter mitral valve implantation

Background

Transcatheter mitral valve implantation (TMVI) is a new treatment option for high-risk surgical patients with degenerated bioprosthesis (ViV), failed annuloplasty rings (ViR) and severe mitral annular calcification (ViMAC). However, limited data exist on transcatheter heart valve thrombosis.

Purpose

The aim of this study was to report the incidence, clinical impact and treatment outcomes of transcatheter heart valve (THV) thrombosis in patients undergoing TMVI.

Methods

All consecutive patients undergoing TMVI in our center between July 2010 and September 2019 were included. A transoesophageal echocardiography and a computed tomography (CT) were performed before hospital discharge and at each clinical visit, at 3 months, at 1 year and yearly after. THV thrombosis was defined as the presence of at least one thickened leaflet with restricted motion suggestive of thrombus confirmed by TOE and/or contrast CT. All patients received anticoagulation therapy with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and a low dose of aspirin for the first 3 months.

Results

A total of 132 patients underwent TMVI (62 ViV, 36 ViR and 34 ViMAC). Among them, 16 (12.1%) patients had a THV thrombosis. Median age was 67 years old and 56.2% of patients were women. Median time to diagnosis of THV thrombosis was 78 days. Early THV thrombosis was observed in 7 (43.7%) and in 13 (81.2%) patients THV thrombosis occurred within the first 6 months after the procedure. 8 out 9 patients with subacute or late THV thrombosis were not anticoagulated or with subtherapeutic anticoagulation. No stroke or thromboembolic events occurred in these patients. No change in mitral gradient was observed in 14 out 16 patients. VKA were indicated in all patients. THV thrombosis resolved in all but one patient.

Conclusion

THV thrombosis is frequent after TMVI, occurs mainly within the first 6-months after the procedure, are mostly subclinical and resolves after optimization of anticoagulation treatment. An anticoagulation therapy for at least 6 months may be necessary.

Timing of THV thrombosis

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

CCS patients with polyvascular disease are a high risk but heterogenous subset of patients: insights from the CLARIFY registry

Introduction

Polyvascular disease constitutes a powerful predictor of cardiovascular events, is found in 10 to 15% of chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) patient. Smoking and diabetes mellitus are strongly associated with polyvascular disease. Risk stratification is key to select the most appropriate therapeutic strategy for a given patient.

Purpose

We aimed to describe 5-year ischaemic risk of CCS patients according to vascular disease phenotype and diabetic or smoking status.

Method

We analyzed data from 32 703 consecutive CCS outpatients (45 countries) enrolled between November 2009 to June 2010 in the prospective observational CLARIFY registry. Three mutually exclusive groups were compared: Coronary artery disease (CAD) alone, CAD with peripheral artery disease (PAD) or cerebrovascular disease (CVD) (CAD+1), CAD with CVD and PAD (CAD+2). Primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction or stroke, adjusted on age, sex and geographic origin at 5 years.

Results

At baseline, 26440 (80.8%) patients were diagnosed with CAD alone, 4967 (15.2%) had CAD+1, 1296 (4%) had CAD+2. Overall, 9501 (29%) patients were diabetics, 19184 (58.7%) were smokers or ex-smokers and only 9220 (28.2%) were free of these two major cardiovascular risk factors. Primary outcome increasing gradually according to the number of arterial diseases locations from 8.4% (95% CI 8.09–8.73) in patients with CAD alone to 17.4% (95% CI 16.95–17.83) of CAD+2 patients (p<0.001). Subgroup analysis according to diabetes or smoking status further enriched risk stratification from 7% (95% CI 6.48–7.59) in non-diabetic, non-smoking CAD alone patients to 20.3% (95% CI 19.08–21.44) in diabetics and smokers CAD+ 2 patients (Figure 1). Diabetic CAD alone patients had a comparable risk to that of non-diabetic and non-smoking polyvascular patients, 9.8% (95% CI 8.82–10.68) vs 10.3% (95% CI 9.61–10.96), p=0.38. Outcome was similar between polyvascular diabetic patients, regardless of the number of arterial diseases, 15.5% (95% CI 14.31–16.60) for CAD+1 and 15.0 (95% CI 13.88–16.13) for CAD+2, p=0.83. Smoking increased 5-year risk proportionally to the number of symptomatic arterial bed, 8.2% (95% CI 7.72–8.68) vs 11.8% (95% CI 11.18–12.31) vs 17.9% (95% CI 17.18–18.54), respectively for CAD alone, CAD+1 and CAD+2.

Conclusion

CCS patients with polyvascular disease remain at high risk of ischaemic events in the contemporary practice with widespread secondary prevention therapies. Polyvascular is a very heterogenous subset of patients with ischaemic risk varying not only according to the number of vascular bed diseased but also according to smoking and diabetes status, two conditions present in the vast majority of CCS patients. Diabetes confers upfront a maximal increased risk. Identification of higher risk subsets in polyvascular patients can potentially identify those that could derived the greatest benefit from new secondary prevention strategies.

Figure 1

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris

Transseptal transcatheter mitral valve implantation versus redo surgical mitral valve replacement for degenerated mitral bioprostheses

Background

The growing use of surgical bioprostheses raises concerns about a future reoperation for bioprosthesis degeneration. There are few data on outcome after transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantation (TMVI) compared with redo surgical mitral valve replacement (SMVR).

Purpose

To compare the feasibility, safety and outcomes of TMVI versus SMVR for degenerated mitral bioprosthesis in high-risk patients.

Methods

In our institution, 52 patients underwent TMVI by transseptal approach and 33 SMVR for degenerated mitral bioprosthesis. The composite endpoint of event-free survival included cardiovascular mortality, stroke, major bleeding, hospitalization for heart failure or mitral valve reintervention.

Results

Mean age and EuroSCORE II were higher in TMVI group vs. SMVR group (age 63±21 years vs. 51±15 years, p=0.002; EuroSCORE II 12.5±12.2% vs. 6.2±3.3%, p=0.001) (Table). In-hospital mortality was 3.8% after TMVI vs. 3.0% after SMVR (p=1.0).

Median follow-up was 2.2 years. At 5 years, survival was 69.7±9.4% after TMVI vs. 86.6±7.6% after SMVR (p=0.10) and event-free survival was lower after TMVI (40.1±9.9% vs 78.7±8.8% respectively, p=0.003) (Figure). In multivariate analysis, older age (p=0.02), neurologic history (p=0.05) and non-elective procedure (p<0.0001) were associated with lower event-free survival, while TMVI vs. SMVR was no longer significant (p=0.17). At last follow-up, 84% patients from TMVI group and 78% from SMVR group were NYHA I-II class. Mean mitral valve gradient and pulmonary artery systolic pressure were respectively 6.8±2.5 mmHg and 45±14 mmHg in TMVI group, and 4.8±2.0 mmHg and 37±11 mmHg in SMVR group.

Conclusion

TMVI is an alternative to SMVR in high-risk patients with degenerated mitral bioprosthesis. Comparison of mid-term results of the two techniques must take into account the differences in patient characteristics.

Event-free survival

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of COMPASS eligible patients in France. An analysis from the REACH Registry

BACKGROUND

Following the publication of the COMPASS trial, the European Medicines Agency has approved a regimen of combination of rivaroxaban 2.5mg twice daily and a daily dose of 75-100mg acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) or symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD) at high risk of ischemic events. However, the applicability of such a therapeutic strategy in France is currently unknown.

AIMS

To describe the proportion of patients eligible to COMPASS in France, their baseline clinical characteristics and the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events, using the REACH registry.

METHODS

From the the REduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) registry database, a large international registry of patients with, or at risk, of atherothrombosis, we analyzed patients included in France with either established CAD and/or PAD and fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the COMPASS trial. The ischemic outcome was a composite of cardiovascular (CV) death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke, and serious bleeding were defined as haemorrhagic stroke or bleeding leading to hospitalization or transfusion.

RESULTS

Among more than 65000 patients enrolled in REACH, 2.012 patients were evaluable and enrolled in France. Among them, 1194 patients (59.3%) were eligible to COMPASS. The main reasons for exclusion of the COMPASS trial, were high bleeding risk (59.1%), anticoagulant use (43.4%), requirement for dual antiplatelet therapy within 1 year of an ACS or PCI (24.7%). In the "COMPASS eligible population", the rate of MACE (CV, MI and stroke) at 4 years follow-up was 13.4% [11.3-15.8], and serious bleeding was 2.5% at 4 years [1.6-3.4]. Patients with polyvascular disease (n=219) had the highest rate of MACE, compared with patients with CAD only and PAD only (19.1% [13.9-26.1] vs. 11.6% [9.1-14.8] vs 13.2% [9.2-18.8], P<0.0001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The COMPASS therapeutic strategy in France appears to be applicable to more than half of CAD or PAD patients. This population appears at high residual risk of atherothrombotic events, and patients with polyvascular disease experienced the highest rate of events.

Blood transfusion and ischaemic outcomes according to anemia and bleeding in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: Insights from the TAO randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The benefits and risks of blood transfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction who are anemic or who experience bleeding are debated. We sought to study the association between blood transfusion and ischemic outcomes according to haemoglobin nadir and bleeding status in patients with NST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).

METHODS

The TAO trial randomized patients with NSTEMI and coronary angiogram scheduled within 72h to heparin plus eptifibatide versus otamixaban. After exclusion of patients who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery, patients were categorized according to transfusion status considering transfusion as a time-varying covariate. The primary ischemic outcome was the composite of all-cause death or MI within 180 days of randomization. Subgroup analyses were performed according to pre-transfusion hemoglobin nadir and bleeding status.

RESULTS

12,547 patients were enrolled. Among these, blood transfusion was used in 489 (3.9%) patients. Patients who received transfusion had a higher rate of death or MI (29.9% vs. 8.1%, p<0.01). This excess risk persisted after adjustment on GRACE score and nadir of hemoglobin (HR 3.36 95%CI 2.63-4.29 p<0.01). Subgroup analyses showed that blood transfusion was associated with a higher risk in patients without overt bleeding (adjusted HR 6.25 vs. 2.85; p-interaction 0.001) as well as in those with hemoglobin nadir > 9.0 g/dl (HR 4.01; p-interaction<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

In patients with NSTEMI, blood transfusion was associated with an overall increased risk of ischaemic events. However, this was mainly driven by patients without overt bleeding and those hemoglobin nadir > 9.0g/dl. This suggests possible harm of transfusion in those groups.

P4569Differential prognostic impact of blood glucose levels at the acute stage of myocardial infarction according to HbA1c. The FAST-MI programme

Background

Hyperglycemia is a well-known prognostic marker in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), associated with higher mortality compared with normoglycemia. Whether the prognostic impact of glycemic status at the acute stage of AMI is similar in patients with chronic dysglycemia has not been extensively explored.

Aims and methods

Using data from the nationwide French FAST-MI cohorts (2005, 2010 and 2015), we analysed the association between glycemia at entry and 30-day death, according to HbA1c level. From the 13,130 patients included, 5,452 had both glycemia and HbA1c assessed at entry. Of those, 1173 (21.5%) had an HbA1c ≥7%.

Results

In patients with HbA1c <7%, LVEF was inversely correlated with glycemic levels (55±11% for glycemia <100, 52±11% for glycemia 100–140, 50±12% for glycemia 140–160 and 49±12% for glycemia >180 mg/dl); a graded association between admission glycemia and 30-day mortality was observed, ranging from 0.7% in normoglycemic patients to 6.3% in patients with admission glycemia >180 mg/dl. In contrast, in patients with HbA1c ≥7%, LVEF was not correlated with glycemia (<100 mg/dl: 49±14%, >180 mg/dl 49±12%), and mortality was the highest in patients with normoglycemia (9.2%) and the lowest in patients with glycemia between 140 and 180 mg/dl (3.1%) (Figure). In multivariate analyses adjusting for baseline characteristics and early management, normoglycemia was associated with a decreased risk of 30-day mortality in patients with HbA1c <7% (HR 0.27, 95% confidence interval 0.10–0.73, P=0.01), while it was associated with a two-fold increase in mortality in patients with HbA1c ≥7% (HR 2.49, 95% confidence interval 1.02–6.09, P=0.046).

Figure 1. 30-day death

Conclusion

In AMI patients with high HbA1c levels on admission, normoglycemia is associated with higher early mortality than hyperglycemia. In contrast, a graded correlation is observed between admission glycemia and early mortality in patients with HbA1c <7%. Management of glycemia at the acute stage of MI might require different measures according to the initial HbA1c level.

Acknowledgement/Funding

Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli-Lilly, GSK, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Servier

P1694Sex is not an independent predictor of ischemic outcomes or bleeding in NSTEMI patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Insights from the TAO trial

Background

There is uncertainty regarding whether female sex is an independent predictor of adverse outcomes in acute coronary syndromes (ACS).

Purpose

We sought to describe and compare ischemic and bleeding outcomes between men and women with Non–ST-segment–Elevation (NSTE) ACS enrolled in the large Treatment of Acute coronary syndromes with Otamixaban (TAO) trial in which antithrombotic treatment was standardized and a systematic invasive approach was performed.

Methods

The TAO trial randomized moderate to high-risk NSTE-ACS patients with diagnostic coronary angiography planned in the first 72 hours to heparin plus eptifibatide versus otamixaban. This post-hoc analysis describes ischemic (all-cause death, new myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis within 180 days of randomization) and bleeding outcomes (TIMI major and minor bleeding within 30 days of randomization) according to sex.

Results

Of 13,229 patients with NSTE-ACS randomized in 55 countries, 3,980 (30.1%) were female and 9,249 (69.9%) were male. Mean age was 64.8±11.0 and 60.7±11.1 years, respectively. The prevalence of diabetes (34.0% vs. 25.8%), hypertension (80.8% vs. 67.0%), and hypercholesterolemia (55.9% vs. 52.2%) was higher among women compared with men but current smoking (21.5% vs. 38.7%) and history of previous MI were more frequent in males (15.5% vs. 20.7%).

Females experienced a higher incidence of both ischemic outcomes (10.2% vs. 9.1%; OR=1.15; 95% CI, 1.01–1.30; p=0.034) and bleeding events (4.1% vs. 3.4%; OR=1.23; 95% CI, 1.02–1.49; p=0.029). Bleeding risk and CV death were particularly increased in women younger than 50 years, compared to males of the same age, at 5.5% vs. 1.4% (OR=4.00; 95% CI, 2.13–7.69; p=0.034) and 1.7% vs. 0.5% (OR=4.35; 95% CI, 1.02–20.00; p=0.02), respectively. No difference in either outcome was found between women and men between 50 and 80 years old. Above 80 years, women experienced a lower rate of bleeding (3.9% vs. 7.8%; OR=0.47; 95% CI, 0.23–0.88; p=0.024) but a similar rate of in ischemic events (16.0% vs. 17.2%; OR=0.92; 95% CI, 0.63–1.33; p=0.67).

After adjustment for age, body weight, diabetes mellitus, prior PCI, serum creatinine, presenting systolic blood pressure, elevated biomarker at presentation, heart failure, the risk of ischemic (OR=1.03; 95% CI, 0.89–1.18; p=0.71) and bleeding events (OR=1.05; 95% CI, 0.85–1.33; p=0.65) were similar between men and women.

Conclusions

In this large international randomized trial of NSTE-ACS with standardized invasive management, women (particularly those younger than 50 years) experienced higher risks of ischemic and bleeding events than men, but the difference was not sustained after adjustment. In this population, sex was not an independent predictor of adverse outcomes in NSTE-ACS. The type of ACS (NSTE-ACS) and routine invasive management in women and men may explain this absence of difference.

Acknowledgement/Funding

The TAO trial was sponsored and funded by SANOFI. The present analysis was supported by the RHU iVASC grant “#ANR-16-RHUS-00010”

3294Frequency, management and outcomes of patients with stable coronary artery disease eligible for COMPASS. An analysis of the CLARIFY registry

Background

The COMPASS trial demonstrated that a combination of rivaroxaban and aspirin improved cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in high-risk patients with either peripheral artery disease (PAD) or stable coronary artery disease (CAD) compared with aspirin alone, at the price of increased bleeding. A previous analysis of the REACH Registry reported an eligibility rate of 52.9% within a population with stable vascular disease. However, most of cardiologists actually treat patients with stable CAD, rather than PAD. Data regarding eligibility to COMPASS in CAD patients from real life practice are scarce.

Purpose

We aimed to describe the proportion of patients eligible to COMPASS within the CLARIFY Registry. Additionally, we aimed to describe their management and outcomes, comparing patients excluded from the trial (COMPASS Excluded), patients eligible for the trial (COMPASS Eligible), and patients who did not meet the “enrichment criteria” for enrolment (COMPASS Not Included).

Methods

We used the CLARIFY Registry, an international observational registry of more than 30.000 patients with stable CAD. In accordance with COMPASS exclusion criteria, patients with a REACH bleeding risk score >10, heart failure (HF), severe renal insufficiency, need for dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), or anticoagulant (AC) therapy were excluded. Then, COMPASS inclusion criteria were applied: CAD patients had to be 65 years or more, or, if younger, have documented atherosclerosis (PAD or revascularization involving at least two vascular beds) or at least two enrichment criteria (current smoker, diabetes mellitus, GFR <60 mL/min, or non lacunar ischemic stroke).The ischemic outcome was a composite of CV death, MI, or stroke and bleeding outcome was a composite of bleeding leading to either admission or transfusion, or haemorrhagic stroke.

Results

Among 15.185 patients with comprehensive data allowing precise assessment of eligibility, 43.1% (n=6.540) had at least one exclusion criteria (COMPASS-Excluded), 23.1% (n=3.503) did not have enrichment criteria (COMPASS-Not Included) and 33.9% (n=5.142) were eligible. The vast majority of excluded patients were excluded due to high bleeding risk (62.7% needing DAPT, and 52.7% for high REACH bleeding risk score). The rates (100 patients/year) of ischemic and bleeding outcome were 2.3 [2.1–2.5] and 0.5 [0.4–0.6] respectively for COMPASS-Eligible, 3.0 [2.8–3.2] and 0.6 [0.5–0.7] for COMPASS-Excluded and 1.2 [1.0–1.4] and 0.2 [0.2–0.3] for COMPASS-Not Included.

Ischemic and bleeding events

Conclusion

In a large contemporary registry of stable CAD patients, approximately one of three patients was potentially eligible for adjunction of low-dose rivaroxaban to aspirin. This group is at particularly high risk of ischemic outcome. Patients with exclusion criteria for COMPASS had the worse ischemic and bleeding outcomes and represent a group in need of improved therapy.

Acknowledgement/Funding

None

P5010Use of risk score to identify lower and higher risk subsets among COMPASS-Eligible patients with stable CAD. Insights from the CLARIFY Registry

Background

The COMPASS trial showed that a combination of rivaroxaban and aspirin improved cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) compared with aspirin alone, at the expense of increased bleeding. An important issue is to identify in this broad population, patients who are likely to derive the greatest benefit without too great a bleeding risk.

Purpose

To evaluate the performance of the CHA2DS2VaSc (range from 0 to 9), the REACH Recurrent Ischemic Score (RIS) (range from 0 to ≥29) and the REACH Bleeding Risk Score (BRS) (range from 0 to 22) to identify patients with the most favourable trade-off between ischemic and bleeding events, among CAD patients eligible to COMPASS

Methods

We used the CLARIFY Registry, an international registry of >30.000 patients with stable CAD. COMPASS inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to the CLARIFY population with complete data (n=15.185) to define the “COMPASS eligible population”. Patients at high bleeding risk (REACH BRS >10), were excluded in accordance to COMPASS exclusion criteria. Patients were categorized as low-intermediate (0–1) or high (≥2) CHA2DS2VaSc; low (0–12) or intermediate (13–19) REACH RIS, and low (0–6) or intermediate (7–10) REACH BRS. The ischemic outcome was a composite of CV death, MI or stroke, and the bleeding outcome was a composite of bleeding leading to either admission or transfusion, or haemorrhagic stroke.

Results

The COMPASS-eligible population comprised 5.142 patients (33.9%). Ischemic and bleeding outcome for this group were 2.3 [2.1–2.5] and 0.5 [0.4–0.6] events/100 patient-years, respectively. Patients with high CHA2DS2VaSc score, intermediate REACH BRS and RIS represented 95.5% (n=4.913), 83.8% (n=4.309) and 37.6% (n=1.934) of the population. Regarding ischemic risk, patients with intermediate REACH RIS had the higher ischemic risk (3.0 [2.6–3.4] vs 1.9 [1.7–2.1] for patients with low REACH RIS, p<0.001), followed by intermediate REACH BRS (2.5 [2.2–2.7] vs 1.5 [1.2–2.0] for patients with low REACH BRS, p=0.0003) and high CHA2DS2VaSc score (2.4 [2.2–2.6]), compared to the overall population. Patients with low CHA2DS2VaSc had the lowest ischemic risk (0.6 [0.3–1.3]) compared to the overall population. Regarding bleeding risk, there were no differences between patients categorized according to CHA2DS2VaSc (0.5 [0.2–1.15] vs 0.5 [0.4–0.6], p=0.95) REACH BRS (0.4 [0.3–0.7] vs 0.5 [0.4–0.6], p=0.80) or REACH RIS (0.4 [0.3–0.5] vs 0.5 [0.4–0.7], p=0.26).

Ischemic (blue) and bleeding (red) event

Conclusions

Among a broad population of CAD patients eligible to COMPASS, low CHA2DS2VaSc score identify a small subset of patients with very low ischemic risk which is unlikely to benefit from the adjunction of low dose rivaroxaban to standard therapy. Patients with intermediate REACH Recurrent Ischemic Score had higher ischemic risk, without increased bleeding risk and may be optimal candidates from adjunction of low dose rivaroxaban.

Acknowledgement/Funding

None

2211Prevalence, incidence and prognostic implications of left bundle branch block in patients with stable coronary artery disease. an analysis from the CLARIFY registry

Background

The prevalence, and prognostic implication of left bundle branch block (LBBB) in general population and patients admitted for acute myocardial infarction (MI) as been extensively studied. However, data are scarce about patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and it remains unclear whether LBBB is only a marker of a severe cardiomyopathy or an independent predictor of events in these patients.

Purpose

We aimed to describe the prevalence, incidence and prognostic implications of LBBB in patients with stable CAD. Additionally, we aimed to describe the incidence of newly diagnosed LBBB that occurred without recent myocardial infarction.

Methods

CLARIFY is an international registry of more than 30.000 patients with stable CAD. LBBB was collected at baseline and at each follow-up visit, and patients were considered to have LBBB if the length of the QRS complex was of more than 120 milliseconds. Patients with previous pacemaker implantation of internal cardiac defibrillator were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular (CV) Death, MI or stroke, and secondary outcomes included hospitalization for heart failure (HF) or the need for pacemaker implantation.

Results

From the 23.457 patients with available data regarding LBBB status, 1.041 (4.4%) had LBBB at baseline and 1.237 (5.3%) had at least one LBBB assessed during 5-year follow-up. Only 21 patients with newly diagnosed LBBB overtime, had a documented MI the same year. Compared to patients without LBBB, patients with LBBB had a higher risk profile regarding age (67.2±10.1 versus 63.6±10.4 years, p<0.0001), history of coronary artery bypass grafting (29.2% vs 23.7%, p<0.0001), diabetes (35.1% vs 28.4%, p<0.0001), and HF (25.2% vs 16.8%, p<0.0001) (Table). In unadjusted analysis, patients with LBBB had a higher risk of primary outcome (13.4% vs 8.7%, p<0.0001) and each secondary outcome. In multivariate analysis taking into account several possible confounders, there was no difference in the rate of CV death, MI or stroke between LBBB or no-LBBB patients (adjusted HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.85–1.29). However, patients with LBBB had a higher rate of pacemaker implantation (adjusted HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.55–3.15, p<0.0001) and hospitalization for HF (adjusted HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.25–1.88, p<0.0001) (Figure).

Outcomes according to LBBB status

Conclusion

The prevalence of LBBB in patients with stable CAD was 4.4% and 5.3% with 5-year follow-up. The overwhelming majority of newly diagnosed LBBB were not contemporary of documented myocardial infarction. LBBB was not associated with a higher rate of major adverse cardiovascular events, including all cause mortality but with a higher risk of pacemaker implantation and hospitalization for heart failure. To our knowledge this is the first study reporting such results in a broad population of stable CAD patients.

Acknowledgement/Funding

None

[Comparison between European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines for initial management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)]

The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) have recently updated guidelines for management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The aim of this study is to compare the both recommendations.

[Risk factors of upper gastrointestinal complications in outpatients on antiplatelet therapy: description and management]

OBJECTIVES

Patients on antiplatelet therapy have a gastrointestinal bleeding risk. It is increased by risk factors. The frequency of those risk factors, the prevalence of upper digestive symptoms and their management in patients on antiplatelet agents is unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed an observational multi-centred prospective survey among 560 French cardiologists with private practice. Each cardiologist completed a questionnaire for the first four patients treated with antiplatelet agents in primary or secondary prevention.

RESULTS

Among the 2182 patients included, (age = 67 ± 11 years; 74% male), 83% had at least one gastrointestinal bleeding risk factor and 38.9% had a history of upper digestive tract symptom. A history of gastrointestinal bleeding was reported in 3.4% and a history of documented gastro-duodenal ulcer in 5.5%. A proton pump inhibitor was already prescribed in 39% of the patients. At the time of the consultation, upper digestive symptoms were described in 21% of the patients. In those patients with symptoms, 85% had no modification in antiplatelet therapy and 62.7% were prescribed gastro-protective drugs (proton pump inhibitors: 51.8%, H(2)-blockers 3.6% other anti-acid medication: 7.3%).

CONCLUSION

Among patients on antiplatelet agents, the prevalence of upper digestive symptoms and risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding is high. Preventative management needs to be clarified in this population.

Antiplatelet therapy following drug-eluting stent implantation: new clinical data and recommendations

Technological developments in percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) allow the possibility for less invasive revascularization in an increasing number of patients with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease. Bare-metal stents (BMS) have considerably improved the efficacy of PCI in addition to greatly reducing restenosis. However, even with standard stents, restenosis has remained a significant limitation of this revascularization technique. The advent of drug-eluting stents (DES) has dramatically reduced in-stent restenosis and, as a result, the need for repeat revascularization. However, their potential thrombogenicity has raised concerns about their clinical utility and long-term safety. Indeed, there is a possible higher rate of late stent thrombosis (LST) with DES compared with BMS. Antiplatelet therapy has been shown to be efficient in preventing DES thrombosis. Nevertheless, in the future, significant improvement will occur to improve the safety and efficacy of this therapy. This article will summarize the pathophysiology and the epidemiology of stent thrombosis (ST). Definitions of definite, probable and possible ST will be described. Furthermore, clinical risk factors for ST will be clearly enumerated. Then, the various antiplatelet therapeutic strategies used to prevent ST will be taken in consideration. Finally, a summary of the major recommendations about antiplatelet therapy made by some of the most prestigious learned societies will be presented.

[Treatment of intrastent restenosis by drug eluting stents: experience from one cardiology centre]

Many interventional treatments have been proposed for intrastent stenosis, in particular by drug-eluting stents, with encouraging results. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical outcome of patients with restenosis of an ordinary uncovered stent treated by a drug eluting stent in a prospective series. The register included 43 patients (50 intrastent restenoses) treated by a drug eluting stent (Cypher or Taxus). The restenosis lesion was focal in 32% of cases with an average length of 14.8 +/- 8 mm and diameter inferior to 2.5 mm in 48% of cases. A Cypher stent was implanted in 44% of cases and a Taxus stent in 56% of cases. After an average follow-up of 6.7 +/- 1.3 months, the major adverse cardiac event rate was 9.3%. It included one transmural infarct in a patient, due to stent thrombosis, and symptomatic restenoses in 3 patients (clinical restenosis rate: 7%). An angiographic control was performed in 15 patients (35%) identifying focal restenosis at the exit of the stent in the 3 symptomatic patients. As in previously reported studies, these results show that with well conducted platelet antiaggregant therapy, the treatment of intrastent restenosis with a drug eluting stent is effective with a low rate of adverse cardiovascular events which compares favourably with previously proposed techniques of management.