Optimizing treatment of brain metastases in an era of novel systemic treatments: a single center consecutive series

BACKGROUND

The multidisciplinary management of patients with brain metastases consists of surgical resection, radiation treatment and systemic treatment. Tailoring and timing these treatment modalities is challenging. This study presents real-world data from consecutively treated patients and assesses the impact of all treatment strategies and their relation with survival. The aim is to provide new insights to improve multidisciplinary decisions towards individualized treatment strategies in patients with brain metastases.

METHODS

A retrospective consecutive cohort study was performed. Patients with brain metastases were included between June 2018 and May 2020. Brain metastases of small cell lung carcinoma were excluded. Overall survival was analyzed in multivariable models.

RESULTS

676 patients were included in the study, 596 (88%) received radiotherapy, 41 (6%) awaited the effect of newly started or switched systemic treatment and 39 (6%) received best supportive care. Overall survival in the stereotactic radiotherapy group was 14 months (IQR 5-32) and 32 months (IQR 11-43) in patients who started or switched systemic treatment and initially did not receive radiotherapy. In patients with brain metastases without options for local or systemic treatment best supportive care was provided, these patients had an overall survival of 0 months (IQR 0-1). Options for systemic treatment, Karnofsky Performance Score ≥ 70 and breast cancer were prognostic for a longer overall survival, while progressive extracranial metastases and whole-brain-radiotherapy were prognostic for shorter overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessing prognosis in light of systemic treatment options is crucial after the diagnosis of brain metastasis for the consideration of radiotherapy versus best supportive care.

CD103+ regulatory T cells underlie resistance to radio-immunotherapy and impair CD8+ T cell activation in glioblastoma

Glioblastomas are aggressive primary brain tumors with an inherent resistance to T cell-centric immunotherapy due to their low mutational burden and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Here we report that fractionated radiotherapy of preclinical glioblastoma models induce a tenfold increase in T cell content. Orthogonally, spatial imaging mass cytometry shows T cell enrichment in human recurrent tumors compared with matched primary glioblastoma. In glioblastoma-bearing mice, α-PD-1 treatment applied at the peak of T cell infiltration post-radiotherapy results in a modest survival benefit compared with concurrent α-PD-1 administration. Following α-PD-1 therapy, CD103⁺ regulatory T cells (Tregs) with upregulated lipid metabolism accumulate in the tumor microenvironment, and restrain immune checkpoint blockade response by repressing CD8⁺ T cell activation. Treg targeting elicits tertiary lymphoid structure formation, enhances CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cell frequency and function and unleashes radio-immunotherapeutic efficacy. These results support the rational design of therapeutic regimens limiting the induction of immunosuppressive feedback pathways in the context of T cell immunotherapy in glioblastoma.

Study protocol: PreOperative Brain Irradiation in Glioblastoma (POBIG) - A phase I trial

Background

Glioblastoma is a high-grade aggressive neoplasm whose outcomes have not changed in decades. In the current treatment pathway, tumour growth continues and remains untreated for several weeks post-diagnosis. Intensified upfront therapy could target otherwise untreated tumour cells and improve the treatment outcome. POBIG will evaluate the safety and feasibility of single-fraction preoperative radiotherapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma, assessed by the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and maximum tolerated irradiation volume (MTIV).

Methods

POBIG is an open-label, dual-centre phase I dose and volume escalation trial that has received ethical approval. Patients with a new radiological diagnosis of glioblastoma will be screened for eligibility. This is deemed sufficient due to the high accuracy of imaging and to avoid treatment delay. Eligible patients will receive a single fraction of preoperative radiotherapy ranging from 6 to 14 Gy followed by their standard of care treatment comprising maximal safe resection and postoperative chemoradiotherapy (60 Gy/30 fr) with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide). Preoperative radiotherapy will be directed to the part of the tumour that is highest risk for remaining as postoperative residual disease (hot spot). Part of the tumour will remain unirradiated (cold spot) and sampled separately for diagnostic purposes. Dose/volume escalation will be guided by a Continual Reassessment Method (CRM) model. Translational opportunities will be afforded through comparison of irradiated and unirradiated primary glioblastoma tissue.

Discussion

POBIG will help establish the role of radiotherapy in preoperative modalities for glioblastoma.

Trial registration

NCT03582514 (clinicaltrials.gov).

Visualising spatial heterogeneity in glioblastoma using imaging habitats

Glioblastoma is a high-grade aggressive neoplasm characterised by significant intra-tumoral spatial heterogeneity. Personalising therapy for this tumour requires non-invasive tools to visualise its heterogeneity to monitor treatment response on a regional level. To date, efforts to characterise glioblastoma's imaging features and heterogeneity have focussed on individual imaging biomarkers, or high-throughput radiomic approaches that consider a vast number of imaging variables across the tumour as a whole. Habitat imaging is a novel approach to cancer imaging that identifies tumour regions or 'habitats' based on shared imaging characteristics, usually defined using multiple imaging biomarkers. Habitat imaging reflects the evolution of imaging biomarkers and offers spatially preserved assessment of tumour physiological processes such perfusion and cellularity. This allows for regional assessment of treatment response to facilitate personalised therapy. In this review, we explore different methodologies to derive imaging habitats in glioblastoma, strategies to overcome its technical challenges, contrast experiences to other cancers, and describe potential clinical applications.

Protocol for live-cell imaging during Tumor Treating Fields treatment with Inovitro Live

Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are an FDA-approved anticancer treatment using alternating electric fields. Here, we present a protocol to perform live-cell imaging (LCI) of cells during TTFields treatment with the Inovitro Live^TM system. The setup we describe dissipates TTFields-related heat production and can be used in conjunction with any LCI-compatible microscope setup. This approach will enable further elucidation of TTFields’ mechanism of action at the molecular level and facilitate the development of promising combination strategies.

•

Inovitro Live^TM allows concurrent live-cell imaging and TTFields treatment

•

Suitable for use with both 2D -and 3D-cultured cells

•

Describes multiple strategies to dissipate TTFields-associated heat

•

Step-by-step description on how to operate the Inovitro Live^TM software

Early Therapeutic Interventions for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: Rationale and Review of the Literature

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Glioblastoma is the commonest primary brain cancer in adults whose outcomes are amongst the worst of any cancer. The current treatment pathway comprises surgery and postoperative chemoradiotherapy though unresectable diffusely infiltrative tumour cells remain untreated for several weeks post-diagnosis. Intratumoural heterogeneity combined with increased hypoxia in the postoperative tumour microenvironment potentially decreases the efficacy of adjuvant interventions and fails to prevent early postoperative regrowth, called rapid early progression (REP). In this review, we discuss the clinical implications and biological foundations of post-surgery REP. Subsequently, clinical interventions potentially targeting this phenomenon are reviewed systematically.

RECENT FINDINGS

Early interventions include early systemic chemotherapy, neoadjuvant immunotherapy, local therapies delivered during surgery (including Gliadel wafers, nanoparticles and stem cell therapy) and several radiotherapy techniques. We critically appraise and compare these strategies in terms of their efficacy, toxicity, challenges and potential to prolong survival. Finally, we discuss the most promising strategies that could benefit future glioblastoma patients. There is biological rationale to suggest that early interventions could improve the outcome of glioblastoma patients and they should be investigated in future trials.

Preoperative Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Glioblastoma

Glioblastoma is a devastating primary brain tumor with a median overall survival of approximately 15 months despite the use of optimal modern therapy. While GBM has been studied for decades, modern therapies have allowed for a reduction in treatment-related toxicities, while the prognosis has largely been unchanged. Adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was previously studied in GBM; however, the results were disappointing. SRS is a highly conformal radiation technique that permits the delivery of high doses of ionizing radiation in 1-5 sessions while largely sparing surrounding healthy tissues. Furthermore, studies have shown that the delivery of ablative doses of ionizing radiation within the central nervous system is associated with enhanced anti-tumor immunity. While SRS is commonly used in the definitive and adjuvant settings for other CNS malignancies, its role in the preoperative setting has become a topic of great interest due to the potential for reduced treatment volumes due to the treatment of an intact tumor, and a lower risk of nodular leptomeningeal disease and radiation necrosis. While early reports of SRS in the adjuvant setting for glioblastoma were disappointing, its role in the preoperative setting and its impact on the anti-tumor adaptive immune response is largely unknown. In this review, we provide an overview of GBM, discuss the potential role of preoperative SRS, and discuss the possible immunogenic effects of this therapy.

Rapid early progression (REP) of glioblastoma is an independent negative prognostic factor: Results from a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

In patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, rapid early progression (REP) refers to tumor regrowth between surgery and postoperative chemoradiotherapy. This systematic review and meta-analysis appraised previously published data on REP to better characterize and understand it.

Methods

Systematic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane database from inception to October 21, 2021. Studies describing the incidence of REP-tumor growth between the postoperative MRI scan and pre-radiotherapy MRI scan in newly diagnosed glioblastoma were included. The primary outcome was REP incidence.

Results

From 1590 search results, 9 studies were included with 716 patients. The median age was 56.9 years (IQR 54.0-58.8 y). There was a male predominance with a median male-to-female ratio of 1.4 (IQR 1.1-1.5). The median number of days between MRI scans was 34 days (IQR 18-45 days). The mean incidence rate of REP was 45.9% (range 19.3%-72.0%) and significantly lower in studies employing functional imaging to define REP (P < .001). REP/non-REP groups were comparable with respect to age (P = .99), gender (P = .33) and time between scans (P = .81). REP was associated with shortened overall survival (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.30-2.43, P < .001), shortened progression-free survival (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.30-2.43, P < .001), subtotal resection (OR 6.96, 95% CI 4.51-10.73, P < .001) and IDH wild-type versus mutant tumors (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.02-0.38, P = .03). MGMT promoter methylation was not associated with REP (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.72-2.28, P = .39).

Conclusions

REP occurs in almost half of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and has a strongly negative prognostic effect. Future studies should investigate its biology and effective treatment strategies.

The impact of anatomical changes during photon or proton based radiation treatment on tumor dose in glioblastoma dose escalation trials

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE

Most dose-escalation trials in glioblastoma patients integrate the escalated dose throughout the standard course by targeting a specific subvolume. We hypothesize that anatomical changes during irradiation may affect the dose coverage of this subvolume for both proton- and photon-based radiotherapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

For 24 glioblastoma patients a photon- and proton-based dose escalation treatment plan (of 75 Gy/30 fr) was simulated on the dedicated radiotherapy planning MRI obtained before treatment. The escalated dose was planned to cover the resection cavity and/or contrast enhancing lesion on the T1w post-gadolinium MRI sequence. To analyze the effect of anatomical changes during treatment, we evaluated on an additional MRI that was obtained during treatment the changes of the dose distribution on this specific high dose region.

RESULTS

The median time between the planning MRI and additional MRI was 26 days (range 16-37 days). The median time between the planning MRI and start of radiotherapy was relatively short (7 days, range 3-11 days). In 3 patients (12.5%) changes were observed which resulted in a substantial deterioration of both the photon and proton treatment plans. All these patients underwent a subtotal resection, and a decrease in dose coverage of more than 5% and 10% was observed for the photon- and proton-based treatment plans, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that only for a limited number of patients anatomical changes during photon or proton based radiotherapy resulted in a potentially clinically relevant underdosage in the subvolume. Therefore, volume changes during treatment are unlikely to be responsible for the negative outcome of dose-escalation studies.

Abstract PO-003: Mitotic enrichment as an efficient radiosensitization strategy

Radiotherapy remains one of the most effective modalities for anticancer treatment. Boosting the efficacy of radiotherapy is therefore a logical avenue to improve patient survival. We have developed a radiosensitization strategy called ‘induction of mitotic enrichment’. It has long been known that the radiosensitivity of a cell depends to a large extent on the phase of the cell cycle and that especially mitotic cells are especially vulnerable. Enriching the tumor for mitotic cells by arresting them during division prior to each radiotherapy fraction should therefore render the tumor population more sensitive to irradiation. Ideally, induction of mitotic enrichment should be reversible and non-cytotoxic to prevent healthy tissue toxicity and be compatible with clinically applied fractionated radiotherapy regimens. We have now identified an orally available targeted tubulin polymerization inhibitor that can achieve repeated and reversible mitotic enrichment for up to 10 hours prior to radiotherapy, without causing cytotoxicity in vitro or healthy tissue toxicity in vivo. Most importantly, this tubulin inhibitor efficiently radiosensitizes a range of preclinical glioblastoma models in vitro and in vivo and significantly improves survival, but only in a mitotic enrichment setup when given several hours prior to radiotherapy to allow accumulation in mitosis. We have initiated development of mitotic enrichment for GBM, the most common primary malignant brain tumor. Their location and highly aggressive nature renders GBM among the most deadly and devastating of human malignancies. Despite extensive treatment involving surgery and adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy, prognosis is still dismal and novel treatment strategies are urgently needed. Of all available adjuvant therapies, radiotherapy contributes most to extending overall survival. Increasing the efficacy of existing radiotherapeutic regimens therefore offers a logical rationale to improve the survival of GBM patients. We are currently also expanding our preclinical development of mitotic enrichment as a radiosensitization strategy to other mitotic targets and different cancers for which radiotherapy is a mainstay treatment and have thus far achieved promising results in vitro. In parallel, we are preparing a phase 0 trial to demonstrate induction of mitotic enrichment in human GBM.

Citation Format: Mark C. de Gooijer, Paul L.G. Slangen, Hilal Çolakoğlu, Ceren H. Çitirikkaya, Amal El Ouazani, Ronak Shah, Gerben R. Borst, Olaf van Tellingen. Mitotic enrichment as an efficient radiosensitization strategy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Special Conference on Radiation Science and Medicine; 2021 Mar 2-3. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2021;27(8_Suppl):Abstract nr PO-003.

RBIO-05. MITOTIC ENRICHMENT AS AN EFFICIENT STRATEGY TO RADIOSENSITIZE GLIOBLASTOMA

Their location and highly aggressive nature renders glioblastoma (GBM) among the most deadly and devastating of human malignancies. Despite extensive treatment involving surgery and adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy, the prognosis is still dismal and novel treatment strategies are urgently needed. Of all existing adjuvant therapies, radiotherapy contributes the most to extending the median overall survival. Increasing the efficacy of existing radiotherapeutic regimens is therefore a logical avenue to improve the survival of GBM patients. We have developed a novel radiosensitization strategy called ‘induction of mitotic enrichment’. It has long been known that the radiosensitivity of a cell depends on the phase of the cell cycle and that especially mitotic cells are especially vulnerable. Enriching the tumor for mitotic cells by arresting them during division prior to each radiotherapy fraction should therefore render the tumor population more sensitive to irradiation. Ideally, induction of mitotic enrichment should be reversible and non-cytotoxic to prevent healthy tissue toxicity and be compatible with clinically applied hyperfractionated radiotherapy regimens. We have now identified an orally available targeted tubulin polymerization inhibitor that can achieve repeated and reversible mitotic enrichment for up to 10 hours prior to radiotherapy, without causing cytotoxicity in vitro or healthy tissue toxicity in vivo. Most importantly, this tubulin inhibitor efficiently radiosensitizes a range of preclinical GBM models in vitro and in vivo, including GSC models, and significantly improves survival, but only in a mitotic enrichment setup when given 6-8 hours prior to radiotherapy to allow accumulation in mitosis. We are currently expanding our preclinical development of mitotic enrichment as a radiosensitization strategy to other mitotic targets and different intra- and extracranial cancer models representing several diseases for which radiotherapy is a mainstay treatment. In parallel, we are preparing a phase 0 trial to demonstrate induction of mitotic enrichment in human GBM.

EXTH-31. INCREASING TUMOR TREATING FIELDS (TTFIELDS) EFFICACY BY TARGETING THE G2 CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT WITH WEE1 OR CHK1 INHIBITORS IN GLIOBLASTOMA CELL LINES

Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are a novel, noninvasive FDA-approved treatment modality for glioblastoma (GBM) that utilizes alternating electric fields. While the mechanism of action was at first exclusively attributed to the effects of TTFields on cells during mitosis, additional effects during interphase have recently come to light. The aim of our research is to elucidate the effect of TTFields on the cell cycle to advance the understanding of TTFields and to find novel targets for increasing its efficacy. We studied the effect of TTFields on cell cycle distribution by (propidium iodide and phospho-Histone H3 labeling) flow cytometry using double-thymidine block (DTB) synchronized cell populations. Following the release of the DTB, TTFields treatment caused GBM cells to accumulate in G2, which was prevented by concomitant exposure to a Wee1 inhibitor. Next, we compared the efficacy of TTFields with or without Wee1 or Chk1 inhibitors in multiple GBM cell lines (A172, SNB-19, and U251) by colony formation assays and observed a strong and synergistic decrease in colony formation potential in all cell lines. To investigate the underlying mechanism of G2 arrest, we quantified the amount of DNA damage, but found no difference in either γH2AX foci or comet tail moments between control and TTFields treated cells. To follow up on this surprising observation, we are using live cell imaging (inovitro Live™) of PIP-FUCCI-transduced cells. This tool will allow us to track individual cells, to evaluate the time spent in each phase of the cell cycle and to determine the ultimate cell fate in control and treatment conditions. Our finding that Wee1 or Chk1 inhibition dramatically boosts the efficacy of TTFields may have great implications for treatment of patients with TTFields. The in vivo validation of our in vitro findings will be performed in tumor-bearing mice by using the inovivo™ system.

Radiosensitivity Is an Acquired Vulnerability of PARPi-Resistant BRCA1-Deficient Tumors

The defect in homologous recombination (HR) found in BRCA1-associated cancers can be therapeutically exploited by treatment with DNA-damaging agents and PARP inhibitors. We and others previously reported that BRCA1-deficient tumors are initially hypersensitive to the inhibition of topoisomerase I/II and PARP, but acquire drug resistance through restoration of HR activity by the loss of end-resection antagonists of the 53BP1/RIF1/REV7/Shieldin/CST pathway. Here, we identify radiotherapy as an acquired vulnerability of 53BP1;BRCA1-deficient cells in vitro and in vivo. In contrast to the radioresistance caused by HR restoration through BRCA1 reconstitution, HR restoration by 53BP1 pathway inactivation further increases radiosensitivity. This highlights the relevance of this pathway for the repair of radiotherapy-induced damage. Moreover, our data show that BRCA1-mutated tumors that acquire drug resistance due to BRCA1-independent HR restoration can be targeted by radiotherapy. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings uncover radiosensitivity as a novel, therapeutically viable vulnerability of BRCA1-deficient mouse mammary cells that have acquired drug resistance due to the loss of the 53BP1 pathway.

Learning radiation oncology in Europe: Results of the ESTRO multidisciplinary survey

INTRODUCTION

Radiotherapy education can be very different across Europe, despite the publication of the ESTRO core curricula in 2011. The purpose of the current study is to map the different RO European education systems, to report their perceived quality and to understand what could be improved to better teach RO.

METHODS

An online survey consisting of 30 questions was sent to RO professionals under 40 years of age via email and social media. Clinicians, radiobiologists, physicists and radiation therapists (RTTs) were invited to answer questions regarding (1) demographics data, (2) duration, (3) organization, (4) content, (5) quality and potential improvements of national education programs.

RESULTS

Four hundred and sixty three questionnaires were received from 34 European countries. All disciplines were represented: 45% clinicians (n = 210), 29% physicists (n = 135), 24% RTTs (n = 108) and 2% radiobiologists (n = 10). Male and female participants were well-balanced in each speciality, except for radiobiologists (80% males). Median age was 31.5 years old (range 21-40). A large range of the duration of the National RO education programs was observed: median = 9 years (range: 3-15). In half of the surveyed countries the European Credit Transfer System (ECTS), that facilitates mobility for trainees, has been implemented. Participants declared only a minority of countries have implemented the ESTRO Core Curriculum (n = 5). A quarter of participants indicated that their national education program is insufficient.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to examine the different RO education systems in Europe. Large differences in organization and duration of national education programs have been found, along with perceived quality across Europe within each speciality. These results show the necessity of a discussion on how to move forward in this diversity of education programs and the potential contribution that the ESTRO may fulfil.

Neoadjuvant olaparib targets hypoxia to improve radioresponse in a homologous recombination-proficient breast cancer model

Clinical trials are studying the benefits of combining the PARP-1 inhibitor olaparib with chemotherapy and radiotherapy treatment in a variety of cancer increasing the therapeutic ratio for olaparib may come from its ability to modify the tumour microenvironment by targeting homologous recombination-deficient, hypoxic tumour clonogens, and/or increasing tumour-associated vasodilation to improve oxygenation. Herein, we investigated the effect of prolonged neoadjuvant exposure to olaparib on the tumor microenvironment using a genetically-engineered mouse p53−/− syngeneic breast cancer model, which is proficient in homology-directed DNA repair. We observed increased in vivo growth delay and decreased ex vivo clonogenic survival following pre-treatment with olaparib 50 mg/kg bid Olaparib for 7 days ending 48 hours prior to a radiation dose of 12Gy. This increased in vivo radioresponse was associated with a decreased hypoxic fraction. This study suggests that the radiation response in patients can be improved with limited toxicity if olaparib is given in a purely neoadjuvant setting to modify the tumor microenviroment prior to the start of the radiotherapy treatment. Consequently a significant gain can be achieved in therapeutic window and clinical studies are needed to confirm this preclinical data.

Radiosensitization by gold nanoparticles: Will they ever make it to the clinic?

The utilization of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) as radiosensitizers has shown great promise in pre-clinical research. In the current review, the physical, chemical, and biological pathways via which AuNPs enhance the effects of radiation are presented and discussed. In particular, the impact of AuNPs on the 5 Rs in radiobiology, namely repair, reoxygenation, redistribution, repopulation, and intrinsic radiosensitivity, which determine the extent of radiation enhancement effects are elucidated. Key findings from previous studies are outlined. In addition, crucial parameters including the physicochemical properties of AuNPs, route of administration, dosing schedule of AuNPs and irradiation, as well as type of radiation therapy, are highlighted; the optimal selection and combination of these parameters enable the achievement of a greater therapeutic window for AuNP sensitized radiotherapy. Future directions are put forward as a means to provide guidelines for successful translation of AuNPs to clinical applications as radiosensitizers.

Significant tumor shift in patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastasis

Introduction

Linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases may be influenced by the time interval between treatment preparation and delivery, related to risk of anatomical changes. We studied tumor position shifts and its relations to peritumoral volume edema changes over time, as seen on MRI.

Methods

Twenty-six patients who underwent SRS for brain metastases in our institution were included. We evaluated the occurrence of a tumor shift between the diagnostic MRI and radiotherapy planning MRI. For 42 brain metastases the tumor and peritumoral edema were delineated on the contrast enhanced T1weighted and FLAIR images of both the diagnostic MRI and planning MRI examinations. Centre of Mass (CoM) shifts and tumor borders were evaluated. We evaluated the influence of steroids on peritumoral edema and tumor volume and the correlation with CoM and tumor border changes.

Results

The median values of the CoM shifts and of the maximum distances between the tumor borders obtained from the diagnostic MRI and radiotherapy planning MRI were 1.3 mm (maximum shift of 5.0 mm) and 1.9 mm (maximum distance of 7.4 mm), respectively. We found significant correlations between the absolute change in edema volume and the tumor shift of the CoM (p < 0.001) and tumor border (p = 0.040). Patients who received steroids did not only had a decrease in peritumoral edema, but also had a median decrease in tumor volume of 0.02 cc while patients who did not receive steroids had a median increase of 0.06 cc in tumor volume (p = 0.035).

Conclusion

Our results show that large tumor shifts of brain metastases can occur over time. Because shifts may have a significant impact on the local dose coverage, we recommend minimizing the time between treatment preparation and delivery for Linac based SRS.

Significant Radiation Enhancement Effects by Gold Nanoparticles in Combination with Cisplatin in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Cells and Tumor Xenografts

Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and cisplatin have been explored in concomitant chemoradiotherapy, wherein they elicit their effects by distinct and overlapping mechanisms. Cisplatin is one of the most frequently utilized radiosensitizers in the clinical setting; however, the therapeutic window of cisplatin-aided chemoradiotherapy is limited by its toxicity. The goal of this study was to determine whether AuNPs contribute to improving the treatment response when combined with fractionated cisplatin-based chemoradiation in both in vitro and in vivo models of triple-negative breast cancer (MDA-MB-231^Luc+). Cellular-targeting AuNPs with receptor-mediated endocytosis (AuNP-RME) in vitro at a noncytotoxic concentration (0.5 mg/ml) or cisplatin at IC₂₅ (12 μM) demonstrated dose enhancement factors (DEFs) of 1.25 and 1.14, respectively; the combination of AuNP-RME and cisplatin resulted in a significant DEF of 1.39 in vitro. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images showed effective cellular uptake of AuNPs at tumor sites 24 h after intratumoral infusion. Computed tomography (CT) images demonstrated that the intratumoral levels of gold remained stable up to 120 h after infusion. AuNPs (0.5 mg gold per tumor) demonstrated a radiation enhancement effect that was equivalent to three doses of cisplatin at IC₂₅ (4 mg/kg), but did not induce intrinsic toxicity or increased radiotoxicity. Results from this study suggest that AuNPs are the true radiosensitizer in these settings. Importantly, AuNPs enhance the treatment response when combined with cisplatin-based fractionated chemoradiation. This combination of AuNPs and cisplatin provides a promising approach to improving the therapeutic ratio of fractionated radiotherapy.

Irradiation of localized squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal vestibule

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term results of primary radiotherapy treatment for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the nasal vestibule.

METHODS

Eighty-one patients were treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and/or interstitial radiotherapy (IRT) for a primary, localized, Wang classified SCC of the nasal vestibule.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 38 months. T1 tumors were treated with IRT: we observed 1 local failure (at 13 months) among 48 patients (5-year local control rate of 97%). Most T2 tumors (20 of 26) were treated with EBRT. There were 8 local recurrences among 26 patients (5-year local control rate of 68%). For the T3 tumors (n = 7; all treated with EBRT), we observed local recurrence in 2 patients (5-year local control rate of 53%). The late-term side effects were relatively mild.

CONCLUSION

Local primary radiotherapy (either IRT for T1 or EBRT for T2/3) is an adequate treatment for SCC of the nasal vestibule with little late sequelae. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E1870-E1875, 2016.

Primary tumour standardised uptake value is prognostic in nonsmall cell lung cancer: a multivariate pooled analysis of individual data

(18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (PET) complements conventional imaging for diagnosing and staging lung cancer. Two literature-based meta-analyses suggest that maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) on PET has univariate prognostic value in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We analysed individual data pooled from 12 studies to assess the independent prognostic value of binary SUVmax for overall survival.After searching the published literature and identifying unpublished data, study coordinators were contacted and requested to provide data on individual patients. Cox regression models stratified for study were used.Data were collected for 1526 patients (median age 64 years, 60% male, 34% squamous cell carcinoma, 47% adenocarcinoma, 58% stage I-II). The combined univariate hazard ratio for SUVmax was 1.43 (95% CI 1.22-1.66) and nearly identical if the SUV threshold was calculated stratifying for histology. Multivariate analysis of patients with stage I-III disease identified age, stage, tumour size and receipt of surgery as independent prognostic factors; adding SUV (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.27-1.96) improved the model significantly. The only detected interaction was between SUV and stage IV disease.SUV seems to have independent prognostic value in stage I-III NSCLC, for squamous cell carcinoma and for adenocarcinoma.

Targeted radiosensitization by the Chk1 inhibitor SAR-020106

PURPOSE

To explore the activity of a potent Chk1 inhibitor (SAR-020106) in combination with radiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Colony and mechanistic in vitro assays and a xenograft in vivo model.

RESULTS

SAR-020106 suppressed-radiation-induced G2/M arrest and reduced clonogenic survival only in p53-deficient tumor cells. SAR-020106 promoted mitotic entry following irradiation in all cell lines, but p53-deficient cells were likely to undergo apoptosis or become aneuploid, while p53 wild-type cells underwent a postmitotic G1 arrest followed by subsequent normal cell cycle re-entry. Following combined treatment with SAR-020106 and radiation, homologous-recombination-mediated DNA damage repair was inhibited in all cell lines. A significant increase in the number of pan-γH2AX-staining apoptotic cells was observed only in p53-deficient cell lines. Efficacy was confirmed in vivo in a clinically relevant human head-and-neck cell carcinoma xenograft model.

CONCLUSION

The Chk1 inhibitor SAR-020106 is a potent radiosensitizer in tumor cell lines defective in p53 signaling.

Image-guided radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer patients: geometrical uncertainty of the heart

PURPOSE

To quantify the geometrical uncertainties for the heart during radiotherapy treatment of left-sided breast cancer patients and to determine and validate planning organ at risk volume (PRV) margins.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-two patients treated in supine position in 28 fractions with regularly acquired cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans for offline setup correction were included. Retrospectively, the CBCT scans were reconstructed into 10-phase respiration correlated four-dimensional scans. The heart was registered in each breathing phase to the planning CT scan to establish the respiratory heart motion during the CBCT scan (σ(resp)). The average of the respiratory motion was calculated as the heart displacement error for a fraction. Subsequently, the systematic (Σ), random (σ), and total random (σ(tot)=σ(2)+σ(resp)(2)) errors of the heart position were calculated. Based on the errors a PRV margin for the heart was calculated to ensure that the maximum heart dose (D(max)) is not underestimated in at least 90% of the cases (M(heart) = 1.3Σ-0.5σ(tot)). All analysis were performed in left-right (LR), craniocaudal (CC), and anteroposterior (AP) directions with respect to both online and offline bony anatomy setup corrections. The PRV margin was validated by accumulating the dose to the heart based on the heart registrations and comparing the planned PRV D(max) to the accumulated heart D(max).

RESULTS

For online setup correction, the cardiac geometrical uncertainties and PRV margins were ∑ = 2.2/3.2/2.1 mm, σ = 2.1/2.9/1.4 mm, and M(heart) = 1.6/2.3/1.3 mm for LR/CC/AP, respectively. For offline setup correction these were ∑ = 2.4/3.7/2.2 mm, σ = 2.9/4.1/2.7 mm, and M(heart) = 1.6/2.1/1.4 mm. Cardiac motion induced by breathing was σ(resp) = 1.4/2.9/1.4 mm for LR/CC/AP. The PRV D(max) underestimated the accumulated heart D(max) for 9.1% patients using online and 13.6% patients using offline bony anatomy setup correction, which validated that PRV margin size was adequate.

CONCLUSION

Considerable cardiac position variability relative to the bony anatomy was observed in breast cancer patients. A PRV margin can be used during treatment planning to take these uncertainties into account.

Clinical results of image-guided deep inspiration breath hold breast irradiation

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility, cardiac dose reduction, and the influence of the setup error on the delivered dose for fluoroscopy-guided deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) irradiation using a cone-beam CT for irradiation of left-sided breast cancer patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Nineteen patients treated according to the DIBH protocol were evaluated regarding dose to the ipsilateral breast (or thoracic wall), heart, (left ventricle [LV] and left anterior descending artery [LAD]), and lung. The DIBH treatment plan was compared to the free-breathing (FB) treatment planning and to the dose data in which setup error was taken into account (i.e., actual delivered dose).

RESULTS

The largest setup variability was observed in the direction perpendicular to the RT field (μ = -0.8 mm, Σ = 2.9 mm, σ = 2.0 mm). The mean (D(mean)) and maximum (D(max)) doses of the DIBH treatment plan was significantly lower compared with the FB treatment plan for the heart (34% and 25%, p < 0.001), LV (71% and 28%, p < 0.001), and LAD (52% and 39.8%, p < 0.001). For some patients, large differences were observed between the heart D(max) according to the DIBH treatment plan and the actual delivered dose (up to 71%), although D(max) was always smaller than the planned FB dose (mean group reduction = 29%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The image-guided DIBH treatment protocol is a feasible irradiation method with small setup variability that significantly reduces the dose to the heart, LV, and LAD.

Kilo-Voltage Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Setup Measurements for Lung Cancer Patients; First Clinical Results and Comparison With Electronic Portal-Imaging Device

PURPOSE

Kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has been developed to provide accurate soft-tissue and bony setup information. We evaluated clinical CBCT setup data and compared CBCT measurements with electronic portal imaging device (EPID) images for lung cancer patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The setup error for CBCT scans at the treatment unit relative to the planning CT was measured for 62 patients (524 scans). For 19 of these patients (172 scans) portal images were also made. The mean, systematic setup error (Sigma), and random setup error (sigma) were calculated for the CBCT and the EPID. The differences between CBCT and EPID and the rotational setup error derived from the CBCT were also evaluated. An offline shrinking action level correction protocol, based on the CBCT measurements, was used to reduce systematic setup errors and the impact of this protocol was evaluated.

RESULTS

The CBCT setup errors were significantly larger than the EPID setup errors for the cranial-caudal and anterior-posterior directions (p < 0.05). The mean overall setup errors after correction measured with the CBCT were 0.2 mm (Sigma = 1.6 mm, sigma = 2.9 mm) in the left-right, -0.8 mm (Sigma = 1.7 mm, sigma = 4.0 mm) in cranial-caudal and 0.0 mm (Sigma = 1.5 mm, sigma = 2.0 mm) in the anterior-posterior direction. Using our correction protocol only 2 patients had mean setup errors larger than 5 mm, without this correction protocol 51% of the patients would have had a setup error larger than 5 mm.

CONCLUSION

Use of CBCT scans provided more accurate information concerning the setup of lung cancer patients than did portal imaging.

Prospective assessment of dosimetric/physiologic-based models for predicting radiation pneumonitis

PURPOSE

Clinical and 3D dosimetric parameters are associated with symptomatic radiation pneumonitis rates in retrospective studies. Such parameters include: mean lung dose (MLD), radiation (RT) dose to perfused lung (via SPECT), and pre-RT lung function. Based on prior publications, we defined pre-RT criteria hypothesized to be predictive for later development of pneumonitis. We herein prospectively test the predictive abilities of these dosimetric/functional parameters on 2 cohorts of patients from Duke and The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

For the Duke cohort, 55 eligible patients treated between 1999 and 2005 on a prospective IRB-approved study to monitor RT-induced lung injury were analyzed. A similar group of patients treated at the NKI between 1996 and 2002 were identified. Patients believed to be at high and low risk for pneumonitis were defined based on: (1) MLD; (2) OpRP (sum of predicted perfusion reduction based on regional dose-response curve); and (3) pre-RT DLCO. All doses reflected tissue density heterogeneity. The rates of grade > or =2 pneumonitis in the "presumed" high and low risk groups were compared using Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

In the Duke group, pneumonitis rates in patients prospectively deemed to be at "high" vs. "low" risk are 7 of 20 and 9 of 35, respectively; p = 0.33 one-tailed Fisher's. Similarly, comparable rates for the NKI group are 4 of 21 and 6 of 44, respectively, p = 0.41 one-tailed Fisher's.

CONCLUSION

The prospective model appears unable to accurately segregate patients into high vs. low risk groups. However, considered retrospectively, these data are consistent with prior studies suggesting that dosimetric (e.g., MLD) and functional (e.g., PFTs or SPECT) parameters are predictive for RT-induced pneumonitis. Additional work is needed to better identify, and prospectively assess, predictors of RT-induced lung injury.

Pulmonary function changes after radiotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with long-term disease-free survival

PURPOSE

To evaluate the changes in pulmonary function after high-dose radiotherapy (RT) for non-small-cell lung cancer in patients with a long-term disease-free survival.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Pulmonary function was measured in 34 patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer before RT and at 3 and 18 months of follow-up. Thirteen of these patients had a pulmonary function test (PFT) 36 months after RT. The pulmonary function parameters (forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV(1)], diffusion capacity [T(lcoc)], forced vital capacity, and alveolar volume) were expressed as a percentage of normal values. Changes were expressed as relative to the pre-RT value. We evaluated the impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, radiation pneumonitis, mean lung dose, and PFT results before RT on the changes in pulmonary function.

RESULTS

At 3, 18, and 36 months, a significant decrease was observed for the T(lcoc) (9.5%, 14.6%, and 22.0%, respectively) and the alveolar volume (5.8%, 6.6%, and 15.8%, respectively). The decrease in FEV(1) was significant at 18 and 36 months (8.8% and 13.4%, respectively). No recovery of any of the parameters was observed. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was an important risk factor for larger PFT decreases. FEV(1) and T(lcoc) decreases were dependent on the mean lung dose.

CONCLUSION

A significant decrease in pulmonary function was observed 3 months after RT. No recovery in pulmonary function was seen at 18 and 36 months after RT. The decrease in pulmonary function was dependent on the mean lung dose, and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease had larger reductions in the PFTs.

Standardised FDG uptake: A prognostic factor for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between standardised uptake value (SUV) obtained from [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) and treatment response/survival of inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with high dose radiotherapy. Fifty-one patients were included recording stage, performance, weight loss, tumour volume, histology, lymph node involvement, SUV, and delivered radiation dose. The maximum SUV (SUV(max)) within the primary tumour was a sensitive and specific factor for predicting treatment response. Apart from SUV(max), stage and performance were also independent predictive factors for treatment response. In a multivariate disease-specific survival (DSS) analysis, SUV(max) (P = 0.01), performance status (P = 0.008) and stage (P = 0.04) were prognostic factors. For overall survival (OS), SUV(max) (P = 0.001) and performance (P = 0.06) were important prognostic factors. SUV(max) was an important prognostic factor for survival of inoperable NSCLC patients and a predictive factor for treatment response. Although the number of patients was small, the treatment was not homogeneous and the use of FDG SUV may have had constraints, we still conclude that the FDG SUV is potentially a good indicator for selecting patients for different treatment strategies.