Hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone for community acquired pneumonia-related septic shock: a subgroup analysis of the APROCCHSS phase 3 randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Glucocorticoids probably improve outcomes in patients hospitalised for community acquired pneumonia (CAP). In this a priori planned exploratory subgroup analysis of the phase 3 randomised controlled Activated Protein C and Corticosteroids for Human Septic Shock (APROCCHSS) trial, we aimed to investigate responses to hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone between CAP and non-CAP related septic shock.

METHODS

APROCCHSS was a randomised controlled trial that investigated the effects of hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone, drotrecogin-alfa (activated), or both on mortality in septic shock in a two-by-two factorial design; after drotrecogin-alfa was withdrawn on October 2011, from the market, the trial continued on two parallel groups. It was conducted in 34 centres in France. In this subgroup study, patients with CAP were a preselected subgroup for an exploratory secondary analysis of the APROCCHSS trial of hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone in septic shock. Adults with septic shock were randomised 1:1 to receive, in a double-blind manner, a 7-day treatment with daily administration of intravenous hydrocortisone 50 mg bolus every 6h and a tablet of 50 μg of fludrocortisone via the nasogastric tube, or their placebos. The primary outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality at intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital discharge, 28-day and 180-day mortality, the number of days alive and free of vasopressors, mechanical ventilation, or organ failure, and ICU and hospital free-days to 90-days. Analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00625209).

FINDINGS

Of 1241 patients included in the APROCCHSS trial, CAP could not be ruled in or out in 31 patients, 562 had a diagnosis of CAP (279 in the placebo group and 283 in the corticosteroid group), and 648 patients did not have CAP (329 in the placebo group and 319 in the corticosteroid group). In patients with CAP, there were 109 (39%) deaths of 283 patients at day 90 with hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone and 143 (51%) of 279 patients receiving placebo (odds ratio [OR] 0·60, 95% CI 0·43-0·83). In patients without CAP, there were 148 (46%) deaths of 319 patients at day 90 in the hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone group and 157 (48%) of 329 patients in the placebo group (OR 0·95, 95% CI 0·70-1·29). There was significant heterogeneity in corticosteroid effects on 90-day mortality across subgroups with CAP and without CAP (p=0·046 for both multiplicative and additive interaction tests; moderate credibility). Of 1241 patients included in the APROCCHSS trial, 648 (52%) had ARDS (328 in the placebo group and 320 in the corticosteroid group). There were 155 (48%) deaths of 320 patients at day 90 in the corticosteroid group and 186 (57%) of 328 patients in the placebo group. The OR for death at day 90 was 0·72 (95% CI 0·53-0·98) in patients with ARDS and 0·85 (0·61-1·20) in patients without ARDS (p=0·45 for multiplicative interaction and p=0·42 for additive interaction). The OR for observing at least one serious adverse event (corticosteroid group vs placebo) within 180 days post randomisation was 0·64 (95% CI 0·46-0·89) in the CAP subgroup and 1·02 (0·75-1·39) in the non-CAP subgroup (p=0·044 for multiplicative interaction and p=0·042 for additive interaction).

INTERPRETATION

In a pre-specified subgroup analysis of the APROCCHSS trial of patients with CAP and septic shock, hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone reduced mortality as compared with placebo. Although a large proportion of patients with CAP also met criteria for ARDS, the subgroup analysis was underpowered to fully discriminate between ARDS and CAP modifying effects on mortality reduction with corticosteroids. There was no evidence of a significant treatment effect of corticosteroids in the non-CAP subgroup.

FUNDING

Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique of the French Ministry of Health, by Programme d'Investissements d'Avenir, France 2030, and IAHU-ANR-0004.

Oxygenation management during veno-arterial ECMO support for cardiogenic shock: a multicentric retrospective cohort study

BACKGOUND

Hyperoxemia is common and associated with poor outcome during veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) support for cardiogenic shock. However, little is known about practical daily management of oxygenation. Then, we aim to describe sweep gas oxygen fraction (FSO2), postoxygenator oxygen partial pressure (PPOSTO2), inspired oxygen fraction (FIO2), and right radial arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2) between day 1 and day 7 of peripheral VA ECMO support. We also aim to evaluate the association between oxygenation parameters and outcome. In this retrospective multicentric study, each participating center had to report data on the last 10 eligible patients for whom the ICU stay was terminated. Patients with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation were excluded. Primary endpoint was individual mean FSO2 during the seven first days of ECMO support (FSO2 mean (day 1-7)).

RESULTS

Between August 2019 and March 2022, 139 patients were enrolled in 14 ECMO centers in France, and one in Switzerland. Among them, the median value for FSO2 mean (day 1-7) was 70 [57; 79] % but varied according to center case volume. Compared to high volume centers, centers with less than 30 VA-ECMO runs per year were more likely to maintain FSO2 ≥ 70% (OR 5.04, CI 95% [1.39; 20.4], p = 0.017). Median value for right radial PaO2 mean (day 1-7) was 114 [92; 145] mmHg, and decreased from 125 [86; 207] mmHg at day 1, to 97 [81; 133] mmHg at day 3 (p < 0.01). Severe hyperoxemia (i.e. right radial PaO2 ≥ 300 mmHg) occurred in 16 patients (12%). PPOSTO2, a surrogate of the lower body oxygenation, was measured in only 39 patients (28%) among four centers. The median value of PPOSTO2 mean (day 1-7) value was 198 [169; 231] mmHg. By multivariate analysis, age (OR 1.07, CI95% [1.03-1.11], p < 0.001), FSO2 mean (day 1-3)(OR 1.03 [1.00-1.06], p = 0.039), and right radial PaO2 mean (day 1-3) (OR 1.03, CI95% [1.00-1.02], p = 0.023) were associated with in-ICU mortality.

CONCLUSION

In a multicentric cohort of cardiogenic shock supported by VA ECMO, the median value for FSO2 mean (day 1-7) was 70 [57; 79] %. PPOSTO2 monitoring was infrequent and revealed significant hyperoxemia. Higher FSO2 mean (day 1-3) and right radial PaO2 mean (day 1-3) were independently associated with in-ICU mortality.

Mild Hypercapnia or Normocapnia after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend normocapnia for adults with coma who are resuscitated after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. However, mild hypercapnia increases cerebral blood flow and may improve neurologic outcomes.

METHODS

We randomly assigned adults with coma who had been resuscitated after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac or unknown cause and admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) in a 1:1 ratio to either 24 hours of mild hypercapnia (target partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide [Paco₂], 50 to 55 mm Hg) or normocapnia (target Paco₂, 35 to 45 mm Hg). The primary outcome was a favorable neurologic outcome, defined as a score of 5 (indicating lower moderate disability) or higher, as assessed with the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (range, 1 [death] to 8, with higher scores indicating better neurologic outcome) at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included death within 6 months.

RESULTS

A total of 1700 patients from 63 ICUs in 17 countries were recruited, with 847 patients assigned to targeted mild hypercapnia and 853 to targeted normocapnia. A favorable neurologic outcome at 6 months occurred in 332 of 764 patients (43.5%) in the mild hypercapnia group and in 350 of 784 (44.6%) in the normocapnia group (relative risk, 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87 to 1.11; P = 0.76). Death within 6 months after randomization occurred in 393 of 816 patients (48.2%) in the mild hypercapnia group and in 382 of 832 (45.9%) in the normocapnia group (relative risk, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.16). The incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with coma who were resuscitated after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, targeted mild hypercapnia did not lead to better neurologic outcomes at 6 months than targeted normocapnia. (Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and others; TAME ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03114033.).

Oxygenation target in acute respiratory distress syndrome

Determining oxygenation targets in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains a challenge. Although oxygenation targets have been used since ARDS was first described, they have not been investigated in detail. However, recent retrospective and prospective trials have evaluated the optimal oxygenation threshold in patients admitted to the general intensive care unit. In view of the lack of prospective data, clinicians continue to rely on data from the few available trials to identify the optimal oxygenation strategy. Assessment of the cost-benefit ratio of the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂) to the partial pressure of oxygen in the arterial blood (PaO₂) is an additional challenge. A high FiO₂ has been found to be responsible for respiratory failure and deaths in numerous animal models. Low and high PaO₂ values have also been demonstrated to be potential risk factors in experimental and clinical situations. The findings from this literature review suggest that PaO₂ values ranging between 80 mmHg and 90 mmHg are acceptable in patients with ARDS. The costs of rescue maneuvers needed to reach these targets have been discussed. Several recent papers have highlighted the risk of disagreement between arterial oxygen saturation (SaO₂) and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂) values. In order to avoid discrepancies and hidden hypoxemia, SpO₂ readings need to be compared with those of SaO₂. Higher SpO₂ values may be needed to achieve the recommended PaO₂ and SaO₂ values.

One-Year Mental and Physical Health Assessment in Survivors after Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for COVID-19-related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Rationale: Long-term outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19)-related acute respiratory distress syndrome treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are unknown. Objectives: To assess physical examination, pulmonary function tests, anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder and quality of life at 6 and 12 months after ECMO onset. Methods: Multicenter, prospective study in patients who received ECMO for COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome from March to June 2020 and survived hospital discharge. Measurements and Main Results: Of 80 eligible patients, 62 were enrolled in seven French ICUs. ECMO and invasive mechanical ventilation duration were 18 (11-25) and 36 (27-62) days, respectively. All were alive, but only 19/50 (38%) returned to work and 13/42 (31%) had recovered a normal sex drive at 1 year. Pulmonary function tests were almost normal at 6 months, except for Dl_CO, which was still impaired at 12 months. Mental health, role-emotional, and role-physical were the most impaired domain compared with patients receiving ECMO who did not have COVID-19. One year after ICU admission, 19/43 (44%) patients had significant anxiety, 18/43 (42%) had depression symptoms, and 21/50 (42%) were at risk for post-traumatic stress disorders. Conclusions: Despite the partial recovery of the lung function tests at 1 year, the physical and psychological function of this population remains impaired. Based on the comparison with long-term follow-up of patients receiving ECMO who did not have COVID-19, poor mental and physical health may be more related to COVID-19 than to ECMO in itself, although this needs confirmation.

Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal for acute respiratory failure: a review of potential indications, clinical practice and open research questions

Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO₂R) is a form of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) largely aimed at removing carbon dioxide in patients with acute hypoxemic or acute hypercapnic respiratory failure, so as to minimize respiratory acidosis, allowing more lung protective ventilatory settings which should decrease ventilator-induced lung injury. ECCO₂R is increasingly being used despite the lack of high-quality evidence, while complications associated with the technique remain an issue of concern. This review explains the physiological basis underlying the use of ECCO₂R, reviews the evidence regarding indications and contraindications, patient management and complications, and addresses organizational and ethical considerations. The indications and the risk-to-benefit ratio of this technique should now be carefully evaluated using structured national or international registries and large randomized trials.

Optimizing PO2 during peripheral veno-arterial ECMO: a narrative review

During refractory cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is used to restore a circulatory output. However, it also impacts significantly arterial oxygenation. Recent guidelines of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) recommend targeting postoxygenator partial pressure of oxygen (P_POSTO₂) around 150 mmHg. In this narrative review, we intend to summarize the rationale and evidence for this P_POSTO₂ target recommendation. Because this is the most used configuration, we focus on peripheral VA-ECMO. To date, clinicians do not know how to set the sweep gas oxygen fraction (F_SO₂). Because of the oxygenator's performance, arterial hyperoxemia is common during VA-ECMO support. Interpretation of oxygenation is complex in this setting because of the dual circulation phenomenon, depending on both the native cardiac output and the VA-ECMO blood flow. Such dual circulation results in dual oxygenation, with heterogeneous oxygen partial pressure (PO₂) along the aorta, and heterogeneous oxygenation between organs, depending on the mixing zone location. Data regarding oxygenation during VA-ECMO are scarce, but several observational studies have reported an association between hyperoxemia and mortality, especially after refractory cardiac arrest. While hyperoxemia should be avoided, there are also more and more studies in non-ECMO patients suggesting the harm of a too restrictive oxygenation strategy. Finally, setting F_SO₂ to target strict normoxemia is challenging because continuous monitoring of postoxygenator oxygen saturation is not widely available. The threshold of P_POSTO₂ around 150 mmHg is supported by limited evidence but aims at respecting a safe margin, avoiding both hypoxemia and severe hyperoxemia.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Cannula-Related Infections: Epidemiology and Risk Factors

Although being a potential major source of infection in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients, data regarding cannula-related infections (CRI) remain scarce. We therefore aimed at describing the epidemiology of CRI among critically ill patients supported by ECMO. Between October 2017 and November 2019, adult patients supported by either venoarterial (VA), venopulmonary arterial, or venovenous (VV) ECMO for more than 24 hours were prospectively enrolled. When CRI was suspected, cannula swab and subcutaneous needle aspirate samples were obtained for microbiological culture. Cannula tips were systematically sent for culture at the time of ECMO removal. Primary end-point was CRI, which was defined by sepsis or local sign of cannula infection and at least one positive culture among swab, subcutaneous needle aspirate or tip. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify risk factors of CRI. Hundred patients were included, including 77 VA, 12 venopulmonary arterial, and 11 VV ECMO. Cannula-related infections were diagnosed after a median duration of ECMO of 10 [7-13] days. Rate of CRI was 24%, including 10% with bacteremia. Most frequent involved pathogens were Enterobacteriaceae (n = 14), Enterococci (n = 8), and coagulase-negative Staphylococci (n = 7). By multivariate analysis, diabetes and ECMO duration were independently associated with CRI.

Association of COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome With Symptoms of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Family Members After ICU Discharge

IMPORTANCE

Persistent physical and mental disorders are frequent in survivors of COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, data on these disorders among family members are scarce.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association between patient hospitalization for COVID-19 ARDS vs ARDS from other causes and the risk of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)-related symptoms in family members.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Prospective cohort study in 23 intensive care units (ICUs) in France (January 2020 to June 2020 with final follow-up ending in October 2020). ARDS survivors and family members (1 family member per patient) were enrolled.

EXPOSURES

Family members of patients hospitalized for ARDS due to COVID-19 vs ARDS due to other causes.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was family member symptoms of PTSD at 90 days after ICU discharge, measured by the Impact of Events Scale-Revised (score range, 0 [best] to 88 [worst]; presence of PTSD symptoms defined by score >22). Secondary outcomes were family member symptoms of anxiety and depression at 90 days assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (score range, 0 [best] to 42 [worst]; presence of anxiety or depression symptoms defined by subscale scores ≥7). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the association between COVID-19 status and outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 602 family members and 307 patients prospectively enrolled, 517 (86%) family members (median [IQR] age, 51 [40-63] years; 72% women; 48% spouses; 26% bereaved because of the study patient's death; 303 [50%] family members of COVID-19 patients) and 273 (89%) patients (median [IQR] age, 61 [50-69] years; 34% women; 181 [59%] with COVID-19) completed the day-90 assessment. Compared with non-COVID-19 ARDS, family members of patients with COVID-19 ARDS had a significantly higher prevalence of symptoms of PTSD (35% [103/293] vs 19% [40/211]; difference, 16% [95% CI, 8%-24%]; P < .001), symptoms of anxiety (41% [121/294] vs 34% [70/207]; difference, 8% [95% CI, 0%-16%]; P= .05), and symptoms of depression (31% [91/291] vs 18% [37/209]; difference, 13% [95% CI, 6%-21%]; P< .001). In multivariable models adjusting for age, sex, and level of social support, COVID-19 ARDS was significantly associated with increased risk of PTSD-related symptoms in family members (odds ratio, 2.05 [95% CI, 1.30 to 3.23]).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among family members of patients hospitalized in the ICU with ARDS, COVID-19 disease, as compared with other causes of ARDS, was significantly associated with increased risk of symptoms of PTSD at 90 days after ICU discharge.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04341519.

Result of one-year, prospective follow-up of intensive care unit survivors after SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia

Introduction

Survivors of viral ARDS are at risk of long-term physical, functional and neuropsychological complications resulting from the lung injury itself, but also from potential multiorgan dysfunction, and the long stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). Recovery profiles after severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in intensive care unit survivors have yet to be clearly defined.

Material and methods

The goal of this single-center, prospective, observational study was to systematically evaluate pulmonary and extrapulmonary function at 12 months after a stay in the ICU, in a prospectively identified cohort of patients who survived SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Eligible patients were assessed at 3, 6 and 12 months after onset of SARS-CoV-2. Patients underwent physical examination, pulmonary function testing, chest computed tomography (CT) scan, a standardized six-minute walk test with continuous oximetry, overnight home respiratory polygraphy and have completed quality of life questionnaire. The primary endpoint was alteration of the alveolar–capillary barrier compared to reference values as measured by DLCO, at 12 months after onset of SARS-CoV-2 symptoms.

Results

In total, 85 patients (median age 68.4 years, (interquartile range [IQR] = 60.1–72.9 years), 78.8% male) participated in the trial. The median length of hospital stay was 44 days (IQR: 20–60) including 17 days in ICU (IQR: 11–26). Pulmonary function tests were completed at 3 months (n = 85), 6 months (n = 80), and 12 months (n = 73) after onset of symptoms. Most patients showed an improvement in DLCO at each timepoint (3, 6, and 12 months). All patients who normalized their DLCO did not subsequently deteriorate, except one. Chest CT scans were abnormal in 77 patients (96.3%) at 3 months and although the proportion was the same at 12 months, but patterns have changed.

Conclusion

We report the results of a comprehensive evaluation of 85 patients admitted to the ICU for SARS-CoV-2, at one-year follow-up after symptom onset. We show that most patients had an improvement in DLCO at each timepoint.

Trial registration: Clinical trial registration number: NCT04519320.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13613-022-00997-8.

The most interesting findings were that most patients showed an improvement in their DLCO at 3, 6, and 12 months, and all patients but one who normalized their DLCO did not deteriorate afterwards. Only 11% of patients had persistent impairment of DLCO at 1 year.

Prevalence and Characteristics of Sleep Apnea in Intensive Care Unit Survivors After SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia

BACKGROUND

Sleep apnea (SA) was reported as possibly exacerbating symptoms of COVID-19, a disease induced by SARS-CoV-2 virus. The same comorbidities are common with both pathologies. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence, characteristics of SA and variation in AHI three months after severe COVID-19 requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of patients admitted to ICU for severe COVID-19 underwent an overnight home polygraphy 3 months after onset of symptoms, as part of a comprehensive follow-up program (pulmonary function tests, 6-minute walk tests and chest CT-scan). Patients with an apnea hypopnea index (AHI) ≥5 were considered as having SA. We performed a comparative descriptive analysis of 2 subgroups according to the existence, severity of SA and indication for effective SA treatment: patients with absent or mild SA (AHI <15) vs patients with moderate to severe SA (AHI ≥15).

RESULTS

Among 68 patients included, 62 (91%) had known comorbidities (34 hypertension, 21 obesity, 20 dyslipidemia, 16 type 2 diabetes). It has been observed a preexisting SA for 13 patients (19.1%). At 3 months, 62 patients (91%) had SA with 85.5% of obstructive events. Twenty-four patients had no or a mild SA (AHI <15) and 44 had moderate to severe SA (AHI ≥15). Ischemic heart disease exclusively affected the moderate to severe SA group. Except for thoracic CT-scan which revealed less honeycomb lesions, COVID-19 symptoms were more severe in the group with moderate to severe SA, requiring a longer curarization, more prone position sessions and more frequent tracheotomy.

CONCLUSION

SA involved 91% of patients in our population at 3 months of severe COVID-19 and was mainly obstructive type. Although SA might be a risk factor as well as consequences of ICU care in severe COVID-19 infection, our results underline the importance of sleep explorations after an ICU stay for this disease.

Nationwide retrospective study of critically ill adults with sickle cell disease in France

Little is known about patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) who require intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The goals of this study were to assess outcomes in patients admitted to the ICU for acute complications of SCD and to identify factors associated with adverse outcomes. This multicenter retrospective study included consecutive adults with SCD admitted to one of 17 participating ICUs. An adverse outcome was defined as death or a need for life-sustaining therapies (non-invasive or invasive ventilation, vasoactive drugs, renal replacement therapy, and/or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation). Factors associated with adverse outcomes were identified by mixed multivariable logistic regression. We included 488 patients admitted in 2015-2017. The main reasons for ICU admission were acute chest syndrome (47.5%) and severely painful vaso-occlusive event (21.3%). Sixteen (3.3%) patients died in the ICU, mainly of multi-organ failure following a painful vaso-occlusive event or sepsis. An adverse outcome occurred in 81 (16.6%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 13.3%-19.9%) patients. Independent factors associated with adverse outcomes were low mean arterial blood pressure (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.98; 95% CI 0.95-0.99; p = 0.027), faster respiratory rate (aOR, 1.09; 95% CI 1.05-1.14; p < 0.0001), higher haemoglobin level (aOR, 1.22; 95% CI 1.01-1.48; p = 0.038), impaired creatinine clearance at ICU admission (aOR, 0.98; 95% CI 0.97-0.98; p < 0.0001), and red blood cell exchange before ICU admission (aOR, 5.16; 95% CI 1.16-22.94; p = 0.031). Patients with SCD have a substantial risk of adverse outcomes if they require ICU admission. Early ICU admission should be encouraged in patients who develop abnormal physiological parameters.

β-lactam dosing at the early phase of sepsis: Performance of a pragmatic protocol for target concentration achievement in a prospective cohort study

PURPOSE

We hypothesized that a protocol of standardized fixed dose using prolonged infusion during the early phase of sepsis may avoid insufficient β-lactam concentrations.

METHODS

In this single center prospective study, patients with sepsis and vasopressors were enrolled if they were treated by either piperacillin-tazobactam, meropenem or cefepime. Βeta-lactams were administered at fixed dose by prolonged infusion. Targeted plasma concentrations for piperacillin, meropenem and cefepime were above 80 mg/L, 8 mg/L and 38 mg/L respectively. Three blood samples were collected per patient over the first 48 h of treatment. Primary endpoint was target concentration achievement during the 48 first hours, defined as all plasma concentrations above the targeted threshold.

RESULTS

Among the 89 patients completing the three samples, target concentrations were achieved for 61 (69%). Target concentrations were achieved in 20 (53%), 32 (89%), and 9 (60%) of the patients treated with piperacillin, meropenem and cefepime, respectively. By multivariate analysis, lower APACHE 2 score, higher baseline MDRD creatinine clearance, and piperacillin use were independently associated with insufficient β-lactam concentrations.

CONCLUSION

Despite a fixed dose antibiotic administration protocol with prolonged infusion insufficient β-lactam concentration was frequent at the early phase of sepsis, especially in less severe patients, without renal failure, and treated with piperacillin. In septic patients with vasopressors, piperacillin dosing higher than 16 g may be needed to achieve the recommended target concentration.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02820987.

An original risk score to predict early major bleeding in acute pulmonary embolism: the Syncope, Anemia, Renal Dysfunction (PE-SARD) bleeding score

Background

Improved prediction of the risk of early major bleeding in pulmonary embolism (PE) is needed to optimize acute management.

Methods

Using data from a multicenter prospective registry including 2,754 patients, we performed multivariable logistic regression analysis to build a risk score to predict early (up to hospital discharge) major bleeding events. We validated the endpoint model internally using bootstrapping in the derivation dataset by sampling with replacement for 500 iterations. We compared the performance of this novel score to that of the VTE-BLEED and RIETE models.

Results

Multivariate regression identified three predictors for the occurrence of 82 major bleeds (3.0%): Syncope (+1.5 points), Anemia defined by a hemoglobin level &lt;12 g/dL (+2.5 points), and Renal Dysfunction defined by a glomerular filtration rate &lt;60 mL/min (+1 point). The PE-SARD bleeding score was calculated by summing all the components. Overall, 52.2% of patients were classified as low bleeding-risk (score, 0 point), 35.2% intermediate-risk (score, 1–2.5 points), and 12.6% high-risk (score &gt;2.5 points). Cumulative observed bleeding rates increased with increasing risk group, from 0.9% in the low-risk group to 9.0% in the high-risk group. The C-index was 0.744 (95% CI, 0.73–0.76) and Brier score 0.028 in the derivation cohort. Similar values were calculated from internal bootstrapping. Performance of the PE-SARD score was better than that observed with the VTE-BLEED and RIETE scores (figure).

Conclusions

The PE-SARD bleeding risk score is an original, user-friendly score to estimate the risk of early major bleeding in patients with acute PE.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None. Figure 1

An Original Risk Score to Predict Early Major Bleeding in Acute Pulmonary Embolism: The Syncope, Anemia, Renal Dysfunction (PE-SARD) Bleeding Score

BACKGROUND

Improved prediction of the risk of early major bleeding in pulmonary embolism (PE) is needed to optimize acute management.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does a simple scoring system predict early major bleeding in acute PE patients, identifying patients with either high or low probability of early major bleeding?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

From a multicenter prospective registry including 2,754 patients, we performed post hoc multivariable logistic regression analysis to build a risk score to predict early (up to hospital discharge) major bleeding events. We validated the endpoint model internally, using bootstrapping in the derivation dataset by sampling with replacement for 500 iterations. Performances of this novel score were compared with that of the VTE-BLEED, RIETE, and BACS models.

RESULTS

Multivariable regression identified three predictors for the occurrence of 82 major bleeds (3.0%; 95% CI, 2.39%-3.72%): Syncope (+1.5); Anemia, defined as hemoglobin <12 g/dL (+2.5); and Renal Dysfunction, defined as glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min (+1 point) (SARD). The PE-SARD bleeding score was calculated by summing all the components. Overall, 52.2% (95% CI; 50.29%-54.11%) of patients were classified as low bleeding-risk (score, 0 point), 35.2% (95% CI, 33.39%-37.04%) intermediate-risk (score, 1-2.5 points), and 12.6% (95% CI, 9.30%-16.56%) high-risk (score >2.5 points). Observed bleeding rates increased with increasing risk group, from 0.97% (95% CI, 0.53%-1.62%) in the low-risk to 8.93% (95% CI, 6.15%-12.44%) in the high-risk group. C-index was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.73-0.76) and Brier score 0.028 in the derivation cohort. Similar values were calculated from internal bootstrapping. Performance of the PE-SARD score was better than that observed with the VTE-BLEED, RIETE, and BACS scores, leading to a high proportion of bleeding-risk reclassification in patients who bled and those who did not.

INTERPRETATION

The PE-SARD bleeding risk score is an original, user-friendly score to estimate risk of early major bleeding in patients with acute PE.

Mental health and stress among ICU healthcare professionals in France according to intensity of the COVID-19 epidemic

BACKGROUND

We investigated the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on mental health of professionals working in the intensive care unit (ICU) according to the intensity of the epidemic in France.

METHODS

This cross-sectional survey was conducted in 77 French hospitals from April 22 to May 13 2020. All ICU frontline healthcare workers were eligible. The primary endpoint was the mental health, assessed using the 12-item General Health Questionnaire. Sources of stress during the crisis were assessed using the Perceived Stressors in Intensive Care Units (PS-ICU) scale. Epidemic intensity was defined as high or low for each region based on publicly available data from Santé Publique France. Effects were assessed using linear mixed models, moderation and mediation analyses.

RESULTS

In total, 2643 health professionals participated; 64.36% in high-intensity zones. Professionals in areas with greater epidemic intensity were at higher risk of mental health issues (p < 0.001), and higher levels of overall perceived stress (p < 0.001), compared to low-intensity zones. Factors associated with higher overall perceived stress were female sex (B = 0.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.08-0.17), having a relative at risk of COVID-19 (B = 0.14; 95%-CI = 0.09-0.18) and working in high-intensity zones (B = 0.11; 95%-CI = 0.02-0.20). Perceived stress mediated the impact of the crisis context on mental health (B = 0.23, 95%-CI = 0.05, 0.41) and the impact of stress on mental health was moderated by positive thinking, b = - 0.32, 95% CI = - 0.54, - 0.11.

CONCLUSION

COVID-19 negatively impacted the mental health of ICU professionals. Professionals working in zones where the epidemic was of high intensity were significantly more affected, with higher levels of perceived stress. This study is supported by a grant from the French Ministry of Health (PHRC-COVID 2020).

An international tool to measure perceived stressors in intensive care units: the PS-ICU scale

Background

The intensive care unit is increasingly recognized as a stressful environment for healthcare professionals. This context has an impact on the health of these professionals but also on the quality of their personal and professional life. However, there is currently no validated scale to measure specific stressors perceived by healthcare professionals in intensive care. The aim of this study was to construct and validate in three languages a perceived stressors scale more specific to intensive care units (ICU).

Results

We conducted a three-phase study between 2016 and 2019: (1) identification of stressors based on the verbatim of 165 nurses and physicians from 4 countries (Canada, France, Italy, and Spain). We identified 99 stressors, including those common to most healthcare professions (called generic), as well as stressors more specific to ICU professionals (called specific); (2) item elaboration and selection by a panel of interdisciplinary experts to build a provisional 99-item version of the scale. This version was pre-tested with 70 professionals in the 4 countries and enabled us to select 50 relevant items; (3) test of the validity of the scale in 497 ICU healthcare professionals. Factor analyses identified six dimensions: lack of fit with families and organizational functioning; patient- and family-related emotional load; complex/at risk situations and skill-related issues; workload and human resource management issues; difficulties related to team working; and suboptimal care situations. Correlations of the PS-ICU scale with a generic stressors measure (i.e., the Job Content Questionnaire) tested its convergent validity, while its correlations with the Maslach Burnout Inventory-HSS examined its concurrent validity. We also assessed the test–retest reliability of PS-ICU with intraclass correlation coefficients.

Conclusions

The perceived stressors in intensive care units (PS-ICU) scale have good psychometric properties in all countries. It includes six broad dimensions covering generic or specific stressors to ICU, and thus, enables the identification of work situations that are likely to generate high levels of stress at the individual and unit levels. For future studies, this tool will enable the implementation of targeted corrective actions on which intervention research can be based. It also enables national and international comparisons of stressors’ impact.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13613-021-00846-0.

Renal dysfunction improves risk stratification and may call for a change in the management of intermediate- and high-risk acute pulmonary embolism: results from a multicenter cohort study with external validation

BACKGROUND

Renal dysfunction influences outcomes after pulmonary embolism (PE). We aimed to determine the incremental value of adding renal dysfunction, defined by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), on top of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) prognostic model, for the prediction of 30-day mortality in acute PE patients, which in turn could lead to the optimization of acute PE management.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter, non-interventional retrospective post hoc analysis based on a prospectively collected cohort including consecutive confirmed acute PE stratified per ESC guidelines. We first identified which of three eGFR formulae most accurately predicted death. Changes in global model fit, discrimination, calibration and reclassification parameters were evaluated with the addition of eGFR to the prognostic model.

RESULTS

Among 1943 patients (mean age 67.3 (17.1), 50.4% women), 107 (5.5%) had died at 30 days. The 4-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (eGFR_MDRD4) formula predicted death most accurately. In total, 477 patients (24.5%) had eGFR_MDRD4 < 60 ml/min. Observed mortality was higher for intermediate-low-risk and high-risk PE in patients with versus without renal dysfunction. The addition of eGFR_MDRD4 information improved model fit, discriminatory capacity, and calibration of the ESC model. Reclassification parameters were significantly increased, yielding 18% reclassification of predicted mortality (p < 0.001). Predicted mortality reclassifications across risk categories were as follows: 63.1% from intermediate-low risk to eGFR-defined intermediate-high risk, 15.8% from intermediate-high risk to eGFR-defined intermediate-low risk, and 21.0% from intermediate-high risk to eGFR-defined high risk. External validation in a cohort of 14,234 eligible patients from the RIETE registry confirmed our findings with a significant improvement of Harrell's C index and reclassification parameters.

CONCLUSION

The addition of eGFR_MDRD4-derived renal dysfunction on top of the prognostic algorithm led to risk reclassification within the intermediate- and high-risk PE categories. The impact of risk stratification integrating renal dysfunction on therapeutic management for acute PE requires further studies.

Semi-elemental versus polymeric formula for enteral nutrition in brain-injured critically ill patients: a randomized trial

Background

The properties of semi-elemental enteral nutrition might theoretically improve gastrointestinal tolerance in brain-injured patients, known to suffer gastroparesis. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerance of a semi-elemental versus a polymeric formula for enteral nutrition (EN) in brain-injured critically ill patients.

Methods

Prospective, randomized study including brain-injured adult patients [Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ≤ 8] with an expected duration of mechanical ventilation > 48 h. Intervention: an enteral semi-elemental (SE group) or polymeric (P group) formula. EN was started within 36 h after admission to the intensive care unit and was delivered according to a standardized nurse-driven protocol. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients who received both 60% of the daily energy goal at 3 days and 100% of the daily energy goal at 5 days after inclusion. Tolerance of EN was assessed by the rate of gastroparesis, vomiting and diarrhea.

Results

Respectively, 100 and 95 patients were analyzed in the SE and P groups: Age (57[44–65] versus 55[40–65] years) and GCS (6[3–7] versus 5[3–7]) did not differ between groups. The percentage of patients achieving the primary endpoint was similar (46% and 48%, respectively; relative risk (RR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 1.05 (0.78–1.42); p = 0.73). The mean daily energy intake was, respectively, 20.2 ± 6.3 versus 21.0 ± 6.5 kcal/kg/day (p = 0.42). Protein intakes were 1.3 ± 0.4 versus 1.1 ± 0.3 g/kg/day (p < 0.0001). Respectively, 18% versus 12% patients presented gastroparesis (p = 0.21), and 16% versus 8% patients suffered from diarrhea (p = 0.11). No patient presented vomiting in either group.

Conclusion

Semi-elemental compared to polymeric formula did not improve daily energy intake or gastrointestinal tolerance of enteral nutrition.

Trial registration

EudraCT/ID-RCB 2012-A00078-35 (registered January 17, 2012).

Renal function improves mortality prediction in acute pulmonary embolism: results of a multicentre cohort study with external validation in the RIETE registry

Background

Renal dysfunction may influence outcomes after pulmonary embolism (PE). We determined the incremental value of adding renal function impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate, eGFR &lt;60 ml/min/1.73m2) on top of the 2019 ESC prognostic model, for the prediction of 30-day all-cause mortality in acute PE patients from a prospective, multicenter cohort.

Methods and results

We identified which of three eGFR formulae predicted death most accurately. Changes in global model fit, discrimination, calibration and net reclassification index (NRI) were evaluated with addition of eGFR. We prospectively included consecutive adult patients with acute PE diagnosed as per ESC guidelines. Among 1,943 patients, (mean age 67.3±17.1, 50.4% women), 107 (5.5% (95% CI 4.5–6.5%)) died during 30-day follow-up. The eGFRMDRD4 formula was the most accurate for prediction of death. The observed mortality rate was higher for intermediate-low risk (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1–3.4) and high-risk PE (OR 10.3, 95% CI 3.6–17.3), and 30-day bleeding was significantly higher (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.3–3.5) in patients with vs without eGFRMDRD4 &lt;60 ml/min/1.73m2. The addition of eGFRMDRD4 information improved model fit, discriminatory capacity, and calibration of the ESC models. NRI was significantly improved (p&lt;0.001), with 18% reclassification of predicted mortality, specifically in intermediate and high-risk PE. External validation using data from the RIETE registry confirmed our findings (Table).

Conclusion

Addition of eGFRMDRD4-derived renal dysfunction on top of the ESC prognostic algorithm yields significant reclassification of risk of death in intermediate and high-risk PE. Impact on therapy remains to be determined.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): BMS-Pfizer Alliance, Bayer Healthcare

Early prescription of direct oral anticoagulant for the treatment of intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism: a multi-center, observational cohort study

OBJECTIVES

The safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism (PE) are unknown. The aims of the present study were to describe outcomes of patients receiving early apixaban or rivaroxaban prescription rather than the recommended delayed prescription strategy.

METHODS

Retrospective post-hoc analysis based on prospectively collected data from a multicenter cohort including all consecutive PE patients stratified as intermediate-high risk. Group definitions were: early group with DOAC prescription <72 h after admission; delayed group with DOAC prescription between 72 h and discharge. The 30-day primary efficacy outcome was a clinical composite of all-cause death and hemodynamic decompensation. The 30-day primary safety outcome was major bleeding.

RESULTS

Among 2411 patients admitted with PE, 302 were treated with a DOAC for an intermediate-high risk PE: 34.2% in the early group and 65.9% in the delayed group. The primary outcome occurred in 4.8% (including 1 death and 4 hemodynamic decompensations) in the early DOAC group and in 9.0% in the delayed DOAC group (OR, 0.44, 95% CI 0.15-1.30). The rate of major bleeding did not differ between groups (OR, 0.99; 95% CI 0.45-2.18). The length of stay was numerically shorter in the early group whereas the other outcomes did not differ significantly.

CONCLUSION

The rate of 30-day outcomes was low in patients receiving a DOAC earlier after admission. Patients in the early DOAC group had a numerically shorter length of stay, with similarly low rates of death and bleeding, and similar RV function recovery compared to the delayed strategy.

Elevated D-dimers and lack of anticoagulation predict PE in severe COVID-19 patients

Background

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may predispose to venous thromboembolism. We determined factors independently associated with computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA)-confirmed pulmonary embolism (PE) in hospitalised severe COVID-19 patients.

Methods

Among all (n=349) patients hospitalised for COVID-19 in a university hospital in a French region with a high rate of COVID-19, we analysed patients who underwent CTPA for clinical signs of severe disease (oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry ≤93% or breathing rate ≥30 breaths·min⁻¹) or rapid clinical worsening. Multivariable analysis was performed using Firth penalised maximum likelihood estimates.

Results

162 (46.4%) patients underwent CTPA (mean±sd age 65.6±13.0 years; 67.3% male (95% CI 59.5–75.5%). PE was diagnosed in 44 (27.2%) patients. Most PEs were segmental and the rate of PE-related right ventricular dysfunction was 15.9%. By multivariable analysis, the only two significant predictors of CTPA-confirmed PE were D-dimer level and the lack of any anticoagulant therapy (OR 4.0 (95% CI 2.4–6.7) per additional quartile and OR 4.5 (95% CI 1.1–7.4), respectively). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified a D-dimer cut-off value of 2590 ng·mL⁻¹ to best predict occurrence of PE (area under the curve 0.88, p<0.001, sensitivity 83.3%, specificity 83.8%). D-dimer level >2590 ng·mL⁻¹ was associated with a 17-fold increase in the adjusted risk of PE.

Conclusion

Elevated D-dimers (>2590 ng·mL⁻¹) and absence of anticoagulant therapy predict PE in hospitalised COVID-19 patients with clinical signs of severity. These data strengthen the evidence base in favour of systematic anticoagulation, and suggest wider use of D-dimer guided CTPA to screen for PE in acutely ill hospitalised patients with COVID-19.

We studied predictors of pulmonary embolism in severe COVID-19 and found that D-dimer level and lack of any anticoagulant therapy were associated with a 17-fold and four-fold increase in PE, respectively, in COVID-19 patients with clinical signs of severityhttps://bit.ly/2ETfAfo

COVID-19 patients display distinct SARS-CoV-2 specific T-cell responses according to disease severity

Adaptive Immune responses generated by SARS-CoV-2 virus in convalescent patients according to disease severity remain poorly characterized. To this end, we designed a prospective study (NCT04365322) that included 60 COVID-19 convalescent patients (1-month post infection) in two cohorts respectively entitled mild illness and severe pneumonia. The monitoring of peripheral immune responses was performed using IFNᵧ ELISpot assay. The serology index of each patient was investigated at the same time. Patients with severe pneumonia were older and had more comorbidities than patients with mild illness. T-cell responses in term of frequency and intensity were clearly distinct between mild illness and severe pneumonia patients. Furthermore, our results demonstrated that recent history of COVID-19 did not hamper viral memory T-cell pool against common viruses (Cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr-virus and Flu-virus). The presence of potent adaptive immunity even in patients who underwent severe pneumonia sustain the rationale for the development of protective therapeutics against SARS-CoV-2.

Ischémie mésentérique aigüe : conduite à tenir diagnostique et thérapeutique

L’ischémie mésentérique aiguë est définie par l’association d’une insuffisance vasculaire mésentérique aiguë à une ischémie intestinale. L’insuffisance vasculaire peut être occlusive (occlusion artérielle ou veineuse) ou non-occlusive (bas débit, hypotension, ou hypoxémie dans les vaisseaux à destination de l’intestin). L’ischémie intestinale est définie comme précoce (en général réversible) ou tardive (possiblement irréversible). La mortalité reste très élevée, entre 65 % et 80 %. La démarche diagnostique repose sur un haut degré de suspicion du diagnostic. La confirmation du diagnostic repose sur la réalisation en urgence, dès la suspicion, d’un scanner AP sans puis avec injection. Celui-ci identifie le mécanisme de l’insuffisance mésentérique, et recherche des signes d’ischémie intestinale. Les résultats du scanner déterminent directement la prise en charge thérapeutique. Le traitement repose sur une triade : revascularisation en urgence ; résection de l’intestin non viable ; mesures générales de réanimation. La prise en charge multidisciplinaire, en centre expert, est primordiale.

ECCO2R therapy in the ICU: consensus of a European round table meeting

Background

With recent advances in technology, patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and severe acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ae-COPD) could benefit from extracorporeal CO₂ removal (ECCO₂R). However, current evidence in these indications is limited. A European ECCO₂R Expert Round Table Meeting was convened to further explore the potential for this treatment approach.

Methods

A modified Delphi-based method was used to collate European experts’ views to better understand how ECCO₂R therapy is applied, identify how patients are selected and how treatment decisions are made, as well as to identify any points of consensus.

Results

Fourteen participants were selected based on known clinical expertise in critical care and in providing respiratory support with ECCO₂R or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. ARDS was considered the primary indication for ECCO₂R therapy (n = 7), while 3 participants considered ae-COPD the primary indication. The group agreed that the primary treatment goal of ECCO₂R therapy in patients with ARDS was to apply ultra-protective lung ventilation via managing CO₂ levels. Driving pressure (≥ 14 cmH₂O) followed by plateau pressure (P_plat; ≥ 25 cmH₂O) was considered the most important criteria for ECCO₂R initiation. Key treatment targets for patients with ARDS undergoing ECCO₂R included pH (> 7.30), respiratory rate (< 25 or < 20 breaths/min), driving pressure (< 14 cmH₂O) and P_plat (< 25 cmH₂O). In ae-COPD, there was consensus that, in patients at risk of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) failure, no decrease in PaCO₂ and no decrease in respiratory rate were key criteria for initiating ECCO₂R therapy. Key treatment targets in ae-COPD were patient comfort, pH (> 7.30–7.35), respiratory rate (< 20–25 breaths/min), decrease of PaCO₂ (by 10–20%), weaning from NIV, decrease in HCO₃⁻ and maintaining haemodynamic stability. Consensus was reached on weaning protocols for both indications. Anticoagulation with intravenous unfractionated heparin was the strategy preferred by the group.

Conclusions

Insights from this group of experienced physicians suggest that ECCO₂R therapy may be an effective supportive treatment for adults with ARDS or ae-COPD. Further evidence from randomised clinical trials and/or high-quality prospective studies is needed to better guide decision making.

Scales Used to Measure Job Stressors in Intensive Care Units: Are They Relevant and Reliable? A Systematic Review

Background: Many studies have been conducted in intensive care units (ICUs) to identify the stress factors involved in the health of professionals and the quality and safety of care. The objectives are to identify the psychometric scales used in these studies to measure stressors and to assess their relevance and validity/reliability. Methods: All peer-reviewed full-text articles published in English between 1997 and 2016 and focusing on an empirical quantitative study of job stressors were identified through searches on seven databases and editorial portals. Results: From the 102 studies analyzed, we identified 59 different scales: 17 "all settings scales" (16 validated scales), 20 "healthcare settings scales" (13 validated scales), and 22 "ICU settings scales" (two validated scales). All these scales used measured stressors from at least one of the following eight broad categories: High job demands, Problematic relationships with other professionals, Lack of control over work situations and career, Lack of organizational resources, Problematic situations with users and relatives, Dealing with ethical- and moral-related situations, Risk management issues, and Disadvantages in comparison to other occupational situations. The "all settings scales" and "healthcare settings scales," the most often validated, did not measure, or only slightly measured, the stressors most specific to ICUs. Where these were taken into account, the authors were forced to develop their own tools or modify existing scales without testing the validity of the tool used. Conclusions: This review highlights the lack of a tool that meets both the criteria of validity and relevance with regard to the specificity of work in ICUs. Future research must focus on developing reliable/valid tools covering all types of relevant stressors to ensure the quality of the studies carried out in this field.

Liberal or Conservative Oxygen Therapy for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

BACKGROUND

In patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute ARDS Clinical Trials Network recommends a target partial pressure of arterial oxygen (Pao₂) between 55 and 80 mm Hg. Prospective validation of this range in patients with ARDS is lacking. We hypothesized that targeting the lower limit of this range would improve outcomes in patients with ARDS.

METHODS

In this multicenter, randomized trial, we assigned patients with ARDS to receive either conservative oxygen therapy (target Pao₂, 55 to 70 mm Hg; oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry [Spo₂], 88 to 92%) or liberal oxygen therapy (target Pao₂, 90 to 105 mm Hg; Spo₂, ≥96%) for 7 days. The same mechanical-ventilation strategies were used in both groups. The primary outcome was death from any cause at 28 days.

RESULTS

After the enrollment of 205 patients, the trial was prematurely stopped by the data and safety monitoring board because of safety concerns and a low likelihood of a significant difference between the two groups in the primary outcome. Four patients who did not meet the eligibility criteria were excluded. At day 28, a total of 34 of 99 patients (34.3%) in the conservative-oxygen group and 27 of 102 patients (26.5%) in the liberal-oxygen group had died (difference, 7.8 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -4.8 to 20.6). At day 90, 44.4% of the patients in the conservative-oxygen group and 30.4% of the patients in the liberal-oxygen group had died (difference, 14.0 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.7 to 27.2). Five mesenteric ischemic events occurred in the conservative-oxygen group.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with ARDS, early exposure to a conservative-oxygenation strategy with a Pao₂ between 55 and 70 mm Hg did not increase survival at 28 days. (Funded by the French Ministry of Health; LOCO₂ ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02713451.).

Initial pH and shockable rhythm are associated with favorable neurological outcome in cardiac arrest patients resuscitated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Background

There is uncertainty about best selection criteria for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) in the setting of refractory cardiac arrest. We aimed to identify factors associated with a favorable neurological outcome, and to build a score calculable at the time of ECMO insertion predicting the prognosis.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent eCPR between 2010 and 2017 in a single university hospital. Primary end point was survival with favorable neurological outcome at intensive care unit (ICU) discharge defined as a Cerebral Performance Category of 1 or 2.

Results

Overall low-flow time of the 113 included patients was 84 [55–122] minutes. Eighteen patients (16%) survived with a favorable neurological outcome. By multivariate logistic regression analysis, initial shockable rhythm, and arterial blood pH at the time of eCPR implantation ≥7.0, were independent predictors of survival with favorable neurological outcome. All of the patients presenting with both non-shockable rhythm and pH <7.0 at the time of eCPR implantation died in the ICU.

Conclusions

At the time of eCPR start, only initial shockable rhythm and arterial pH ≥7.0 predicted neurological outcome. A selection of the patients who might benefit from eCPR, based upon initial rhythm and arterial pH rather than on low flow time, should be further evaluated.

Ventilation feedback device for manual ventilation in simulated respiratory arrest: a crossover manikin study

Background

Studies have shown that providing adequate ventilation during CPR is essential. While hypoventilation is often feared by most caregivers on the scene, the most critical problem remains hyperventilation. We developed a Ventilation Feedback Device (VFD) for manual ventilation which monitors ventilatory parameters and provides direct feedback about ventilation quality to the rescuer. This study aims to compare the quality of conventional manual ventilation to ventilation with VFD on a simulated respiratory arrest patient.

Methods

Forty healthcare providers were enrolled and instructed to ventilate a manikin simulating respiratory arrest. Participants were instructed to ventilate the manikin for 5 min with and without the VFD in random order. They were divided in two groups of 20 people, one group ventilating through a mask and the other through an endotracheal tube.

Results

Ventilation with the VFD improved from 15 to 90% (p < 0.001) with the mask and from 15 to 85% (p < 0.001) with the endotracheal tube (ETT) by significantly reducing the proportion of hyperventilation. The mean ventilation rates and tidal volumes were in the recommended ranges in respectively 100% with the mask and 97.5% of participants with the ETT when using the VFD.

Conclusion

VFD improves the performance of manual ventilation by over 70% in different simulated scenarios. By providing the rescuer direct feedback and analysis of ventilatory parameters, this device can significantly improve ventilation while performing CPR and thus save lives.

P2767Outcomes and incremental prognostic value of renal function impairment after acute pulmonary embolism

Background

We explored the relation between adverse outcomes after acute pulmonary embolism (PE)and renal dysfunction classified by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the CKD-EPI equation. We assessed the incremental value of adding eGFR CKD-EPI to the ESC score for predicting 30d mortality.

Methods

Prospective, multicenter study of 1664 acute PE admitted from 01/2011 to 12/2017. Pts were categorized in 4 eGFR groups: Group 1 (eGFR ≥60 ml/min/1.73m2, n=1178), group 2 (45–59; n=257); group 3 (30–44; n=150), group 4 (≤29; n=79).

Results

All-cause and CV death at 30 days and 6 months were higher in group 3 (p=0.005 and p=0.03) and group 4 (p<0.001 and p<0.001 respectively) vs group 1. Major bleeding at 30d and 6m was higher in group 2 vs group 1 (p=0.003 for both). Renal dysfunction combined with the ESC prognostic algorithm for prediction of 30d death improved discriminatory capacity of the model and enabled reclassification in different risk categories in 27% of pts (Table).

Without eGFR CKD-EPI OR (95% CI) With eGFR CKD-EPI OR (95% CI) ESC algorithm 2.59 (1.95–3.43) 2.30 (1.72–3.07) eGFR CKD-EPI – 2.60 (1.62–4.7) Measures of fit   Bayes information criterion 607.30 599.32   Akaike information criterion 596.47 583.06   C-statistic 0.71* 0.77*   P (Hosmer-Lemeshow) 0.057 0.43   Integrated discrimination improvement – 0.054 (0.052–0.056)   Net reclassification improvement – 0.93 (0.90–0.95) Prognostic performance   Sensitivity 62.5 (51.2–72.3) 76.2 (61.5–90.2)   Specificity 64.2 (49.1–74.4) 69.9 (47.6–83.5)   Positive predictive value 10.1 (8.2–11.3) 16.2 (14.2–18.2)   Negative predictive value 0.97 (0.96–0.98) 98.1 (97.2–99.2)   Positive likelihood ratio 1.96 (1.12–3.41) 2.12 (1.54–3.12)   Negative likelihood ratio 0.50 (0.25–1.81) 0.54 (0.20–1.56)   Youden index 0.31 (0.28–0.34) 0.39 (0.36–0.41) Difference in C-statistic: *p=0.04.

Conclusion

Renal function impairment increases the rate of adverse events after acute PE. Combined with the ESC early mortality risk score, eGFR improves risk classification.

Trisodium citrate 4% versus heparin as a catheter lock for non-tunneled hemodialysis catheters in critically ill patients: a multicenter, randomized clinical trial

Background

Non-tunneled hemodialysis catheters are currently used for critically ill patients with acute kidney injury requiring extracorporeal renal replacement therapy. Strategies to prevent catheter dysfunction and infection with catheter locks remain controversial.

Methods

In a multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blind trial, we compared two strategies for catheter locking of non-tunneled hemodialysis catheters, namely trisodium citrate at 4% (intervention group) versus unfractionated heparin (control group), in patients aged 18 years or older admitted to the intensive care unit and in whom a first non-tunneled hemodialysis catheter was to be inserted by the jugular or femoral vein. The primary endpoint was length of event-free survival of the first non-tunneled hemodialysis catheter. Secondary endpoints were: rate of fibrinolysis, incidence of catheter dysfunction and incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), all per 1000 catheter-days; number of hemorrhagic events requiring transfusion, length of stay in intensive care and in hospital; 28-day mortality.

Results

Overall, 396 randomized patients completed the trial: 199 in the citrate group and 197 in the heparin group. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between groups. The duration of event-free survival of the first non-tunneled hemodialysis catheter was not significantly different between groups: 7 days (IQR 3–10) in the citrate group and 5 days (IQR 3–11) in the heparin group (p = 0.51). Rates of catheter thrombosis, CRBSI, and adverse events were not statistically different between groups.

Conclusions

In critically ill patients, there was no significant difference in the duration of event-free survival of the first non-tunneled hemodialysis catheter between trisodium citrate 4% and heparin as a locking solution. Catheter thrombosis, catheter-related infection, and adverse events were not statistically different between the two groups.

Trial registration Registered with Clinicaltrials.gov under the number NCT01962116. Registered 14 October 2013.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13613-019-0553-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.