1
|
Guergan S, Boeer B, Fugunt R, Helms G, Roehm C, Solomianik A, Neugebauer A, Nuessle D, Schuermann M, Brunecker K, Jurjut O, Boehme KA, Dammeier S, Enderle MD, Bettio S, Gonzalez-Menendez I, Staebler A, Brucker SY, Kraemer B, Wallwiener D, Fend F, Hahn M. Optical Emission Spectroscopy for the Real-Time Identification of Malignant Breast Tissue. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:338. [PMID: 38337854 PMCID: PMC10855719 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14030338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Breast conserving resection with free margins is the gold standard treatment for early breast cancer recommended by guidelines worldwide. Therefore, reliable discrimination between normal and malignant tissue at the resection margins is essential. In this study, normal and abnormal tissue samples from breast cancer patients were characterized ex vivo by optical emission spectroscopy (OES) based on ionized atoms and molecules generated during electrosurgical treatment. The aim of the study was to determine spectroscopic features which are typical for healthy and neoplastic breast tissue allowing for future real-time tissue differentiation and margin assessment during breast cancer surgery. A total of 972 spectra generated by electrosurgical sparking on normal and abnormal tissue were used for support vector classifier (SVC) training. Specific spectroscopic features were selected for the classification of tissues in the included breast cancer patients. The average classification accuracy for all patients was 96.9%. Normal and abnormal breast tissue could be differentiated with a mean sensitivity of 94.8%, a specificity of 99.0%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 99.1% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.1%. For 66.6% patients all classifications reached 100%. Based on this convincing data, a future clinical application of OES-based tissue differentiation in breast cancer surgery seems to be feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selin Guergan
- Department of Women’s Health, Tuebingen University Hospital, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (B.B.); (R.F.); (G.H.); (C.R.); (A.S.); (S.Y.B.); (B.K.); (D.W.); (M.H.)
| | - Bettina Boeer
- Department of Women’s Health, Tuebingen University Hospital, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (B.B.); (R.F.); (G.H.); (C.R.); (A.S.); (S.Y.B.); (B.K.); (D.W.); (M.H.)
| | - Regina Fugunt
- Department of Women’s Health, Tuebingen University Hospital, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (B.B.); (R.F.); (G.H.); (C.R.); (A.S.); (S.Y.B.); (B.K.); (D.W.); (M.H.)
| | - Gisela Helms
- Department of Women’s Health, Tuebingen University Hospital, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (B.B.); (R.F.); (G.H.); (C.R.); (A.S.); (S.Y.B.); (B.K.); (D.W.); (M.H.)
| | - Carmen Roehm
- Department of Women’s Health, Tuebingen University Hospital, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (B.B.); (R.F.); (G.H.); (C.R.); (A.S.); (S.Y.B.); (B.K.); (D.W.); (M.H.)
| | - Anna Solomianik
- Department of Women’s Health, Tuebingen University Hospital, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (B.B.); (R.F.); (G.H.); (C.R.); (A.S.); (S.Y.B.); (B.K.); (D.W.); (M.H.)
| | - Alexander Neugebauer
- Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH, Waldhoernlestr. 17, 72072 Tübingen, Germany; (A.N.); (D.N.); (M.S.); (O.J.); (K.A.B.); (S.D.); (M.D.E.)
| | - Daniela Nuessle
- Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH, Waldhoernlestr. 17, 72072 Tübingen, Germany; (A.N.); (D.N.); (M.S.); (O.J.); (K.A.B.); (S.D.); (M.D.E.)
| | - Mirjam Schuermann
- Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH, Waldhoernlestr. 17, 72072 Tübingen, Germany; (A.N.); (D.N.); (M.S.); (O.J.); (K.A.B.); (S.D.); (M.D.E.)
| | - Kristin Brunecker
- Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH, Waldhoernlestr. 17, 72072 Tübingen, Germany; (A.N.); (D.N.); (M.S.); (O.J.); (K.A.B.); (S.D.); (M.D.E.)
| | - Ovidiu Jurjut
- Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH, Waldhoernlestr. 17, 72072 Tübingen, Germany; (A.N.); (D.N.); (M.S.); (O.J.); (K.A.B.); (S.D.); (M.D.E.)
| | - Karen A. Boehme
- Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH, Waldhoernlestr. 17, 72072 Tübingen, Germany; (A.N.); (D.N.); (M.S.); (O.J.); (K.A.B.); (S.D.); (M.D.E.)
| | - Sascha Dammeier
- Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH, Waldhoernlestr. 17, 72072 Tübingen, Germany; (A.N.); (D.N.); (M.S.); (O.J.); (K.A.B.); (S.D.); (M.D.E.)
| | - Markus D. Enderle
- Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH, Waldhoernlestr. 17, 72072 Tübingen, Germany; (A.N.); (D.N.); (M.S.); (O.J.); (K.A.B.); (S.D.); (M.D.E.)
| | - Sabrina Bettio
- Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, Tuebingen University Hospital, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (S.B.); (I.G.-M.); (A.S.); (F.F.)
| | - Irene Gonzalez-Menendez
- Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, Tuebingen University Hospital, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (S.B.); (I.G.-M.); (A.S.); (F.F.)
| | - Annette Staebler
- Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, Tuebingen University Hospital, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (S.B.); (I.G.-M.); (A.S.); (F.F.)
| | - Sara Y. Brucker
- Department of Women’s Health, Tuebingen University Hospital, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (B.B.); (R.F.); (G.H.); (C.R.); (A.S.); (S.Y.B.); (B.K.); (D.W.); (M.H.)
| | - Bernhard Kraemer
- Department of Women’s Health, Tuebingen University Hospital, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (B.B.); (R.F.); (G.H.); (C.R.); (A.S.); (S.Y.B.); (B.K.); (D.W.); (M.H.)
| | - Diethelm Wallwiener
- Department of Women’s Health, Tuebingen University Hospital, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (B.B.); (R.F.); (G.H.); (C.R.); (A.S.); (S.Y.B.); (B.K.); (D.W.); (M.H.)
| | - Falko Fend
- Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, Tuebingen University Hospital, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (S.B.); (I.G.-M.); (A.S.); (F.F.)
| | - Markus Hahn
- Department of Women’s Health, Tuebingen University Hospital, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (B.B.); (R.F.); (G.H.); (C.R.); (A.S.); (S.Y.B.); (B.K.); (D.W.); (M.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Boeer B, Helms G, Pasternak J, Roehm C, Kofler L, Haefner HM, Moehrle M, Heim E, Fischer H, Brucker SY, Hahn M. Back to the future: breast surgery with tumescent local anesthesia (TLA)? Arch Gynecol Obstet 2023; 308:935-940. [PMID: 36872392 PMCID: PMC10348980 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-023-06938-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Breast surgery is usually performed under general anesthesia. Tumescent local anesthesia (TLA) offers the possibility to anesthetize large areas with highly diluted local anesthetic. METHODS In this paper, the implementation, and experiences with TLA in the field of breast surgery are discussed. CONCLUSION For carefully selected indications, breast surgery in TLA represents an alternative to ITN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Boeer
- Department of Women's Health, University Hospital Tuebingen, Calwerstrasse 7, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
| | - G Helms
- Department of Women's Health, University Hospital Tuebingen, Calwerstrasse 7, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - J Pasternak
- Department of Women's Health, University Hospital Tuebingen, Calwerstrasse 7, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - C Roehm
- Department of Women's Health, University Hospital Tuebingen, Calwerstrasse 7, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - L Kofler
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - H M Haefner
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - M Moehrle
- Praxisklinik Haut Und Venen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - E Heim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - H Fischer
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - S Y Brucker
- Department of Women's Health, University Hospital Tuebingen, Calwerstrasse 7, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - M Hahn
- Department of Women's Health, University Hospital Tuebingen, Calwerstrasse 7, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Guergan S, Hoopmann U, Roehm C, Boeer B, Fugunt R, Helms G, Seller A, Marx M, Oberlechner E, Hartkopf A, Preibsch H, Brucker S, Wallwiener D, Hahn M, Gruber IV. Evaluation of sonographic detectability of different markers within an in vitro simulation model of the axilla. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2021; 304:839-848. [PMID: 34142225 PMCID: PMC8325667 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-021-06085-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Clip-marking of axillary lymph nodes with initial biopsy-confirmed metastasis is required for targeted axillary dissection (TAD), which includes sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) and selective localization and removal of the clipped targeted lymph node. There have been several studies which examined the feasibility of TAD in routine clinical use. In this context, the optimal clip visualisation was noted as one of the crucial limiting factors. We, therefore, evaluated the sonographic detectability of 10 different commercially available markers within an in vitro model simulating the anatomical composition of the axilla. METHODS In this standardised model consisting of porcine fat with 30 mm thickness, the visibility of a total of ten markers was analysed in all 3 planes (parallel, diagonal, orthograde) with wire guidance and then classified into either "visibility good", "visibility moderate" or "visibility poor" with regard to the alignment of the transducer. Additionally, "real-life conditions" were simulated, in which the markers were searched without any wires guidance. RESULTS It was observed that, while not all markers are detectable in fatty tissue, markers with spherical shape (non-embedded Inconel or Nitinol) or rectangular-shaped Titanium markers with embedded material have a clear advantage. 3D-shaped markers can always be detected in all three axes, which is of particular importance in the axilla with its pyramid shape and fatty tissue. CONCLUSION The shape and the embedding of the material play a crucial role for visibility and efficacy of the marker, as reliable marking of suspicious and pathological axillary lymph nodes is essential for TAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selin Guergan
- Department for Women's Health, University of Tübingen, Calwerstraße 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Uta Hoopmann
- Department for Women's Health, University of Tübingen, Calwerstraße 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Carmen Roehm
- Department for Women's Health, University of Tübingen, Calwerstraße 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Bettina Boeer
- Department for Women's Health, University of Tübingen, Calwerstraße 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Regina Fugunt
- Department for Women's Health, University of Tübingen, Calwerstraße 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Gisela Helms
- Department for Women's Health, University of Tübingen, Calwerstraße 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Anna Seller
- Department for Women's Health, University of Tübingen, Calwerstraße 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Mario Marx
- Department for Women's Health, University of Tübingen, Calwerstraße 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.,Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Breast Surgery, Elblandklinikum Radebeul, Radebeul, Germany
| | - Ernst Oberlechner
- Department for Women's Health, University of Tübingen, Calwerstraße 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Andreas Hartkopf
- Department for Women's Health, University of Tübingen, Calwerstraße 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Heike Preibsch
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sara Brucker
- Department for Women's Health, University of Tübingen, Calwerstraße 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Diethelm Wallwiener
- Department for Women's Health, University of Tübingen, Calwerstraße 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Markus Hahn
- Department for Women's Health, University of Tübingen, Calwerstraße 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Ines Verena Gruber
- Department for Women's Health, University of Tübingen, Calwerstraße 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kolberg HC, Kühn T, Krajewska M, Bauerfeind I, Fehm TN, Fleige B, Helms G, Lebeau A, Stäbler A, Schmatloch S, Hauschild M, Schwentner L, Schrenk P, Loibl S, Untch M, Kolberg-Liedtke C. Correction: Residual Axillary Burden After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NACT) in Early Breast Cancer in Patients with a priori Clinically Occult Nodal Metastases - a transSENTINA Analysis. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2020; 80:e290. [PMID: 33335331 PMCID: PMC7738234 DOI: 10.1055/a-1336-7155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Interdisciplinary Breast Centre, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - Maja Krajewska
- Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité - University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ingo Bauerfeind
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany
| | - Tanja N Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Barbara Fleige
- Department of Pathology, Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Gisela Helms
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Centre Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Annette Lebeau
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Annette Stäbler
- Department of Pathology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Maik Hauschild
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Health Center Fricktal, Rheinfelden, Switzerland
| | | | - Peter Schrenk
- Breast Competence Centre, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria
| | | | - Michael Untch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kolberg HC, Kühn T, Krajewska M, Bauerfeind I, Fehm TN, Fleige B, Helms G, Lebeau A, Stäbler A, Schmatloch S, Hausschild M, Schwentner L, Schrenk P, Loibl S, Untch M, Kolberg-Liedtke C. Residual Axillary Burden After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NACT) in Early Breast Cancer in Patients with a priori Clinically Occult Nodal Metastases - a transSENTINA Analysis. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2020; 80:1229-1236. [PMID: 33293731 PMCID: PMC7714621 DOI: 10.1055/a-1298-3453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Among patients with breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), the association between pathological complete remission (pCR) in the breast and clinical/pathological parameters is well established, whereas the association between these parameters and residual axillary involvement after NACT remains unclear.
Methods
Patients with clinically occult nodal metastases (i.e. negative by clinical assessment but positive by SLNB prior to NACT, i.e. Arm B of the SENTINA trial) were included in the presented analysis. All patients received a second sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and axillary dissection after NACT. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out to evaluate the association between clinical/pathological parameters and axillary involvement after NACT.
Results
Arm B of the SENTINA study contained 360 patients, 318 of which were evaluable for this analysis. After NACT, 71/318 (22.3%) patients had involved SLNs or non-SLNs after NACT. Overall, 71/318 (22.3%) patients achieved a pCR in the breast. Associations of extranodal spread, lack of multifocality and pCR in the breast with residual axillary burden were statistically significant. In a descriptive analysis including all patients with clinically negative axilla before NACT in the SENTINA trial 1.2% of triple negative (TN) patients and 0.5% of HER/2 positive patients had residual axillary disease in case of a breast pCR.
Conclusions
Patients in the SENTINA trial with clinically negative axilla and involved SLNs still carried a significant risk of nodal metastases after NACT. However, the risk of residual axillary burden was particularly low in TN and HER/2 positive tumors in case of a breast pCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Interdisciplinary Breast Centre, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - Maja Krajewska
- Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité - University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ingo Bauerfeind
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany
| | - Tanja N Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Barbara Fleige
- Department of Pathology, Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Gisela Helms
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Centre Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Annette Lebeau
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Annette Stäbler
- Department of Pathology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Maik Hausschild
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Health Center Fricktal, Rheinfelden, Switzerland
| | | | - Peter Schrenk
- Breast Competence Centre, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria
| | | | - Michael Untch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wiggermann V, Vavasour IM, Kolind SH, MacKay AL, Helms G, Rauscher A. Non-negative least squares computation for in vivo myelin mapping using simulated multi-echo spin-echo T 2 decay data. NMR Biomed 2020; 33:e4277. [PMID: 32124505 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2019] [Revised: 01/20/2020] [Accepted: 01/26/2020] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Multi-compartment T2 mapping has gained particular relevance for the study of myelin water in the brain. As a facilitator of rapid saltatory axonal signal transmission, myelin is a cornerstone indicator of white matter development and function. Regularized non-negative least squares fitting of multi-echo T2 data has been widely employed for the computation of the myelin water fraction (MWF), and the obtained MWF maps have been histopathologically validated. MWF measurements depend upon the quality of the data acquisition, B1+ homogeneity and a range of fitting parameters. In this special issue article, we discuss the relevance of these factors for the accurate computation of multi-compartment T2 and MWF maps. We generated multi-echo spin-echo T2 decay curves following the Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill approach for various myelin concentrations and myelin T2 scenarios by simulating the evolution of the magnetization vector between echoes based on the Bloch equations. We demonstrated that noise and imperfect refocusing flip angles yield systematic underestimations in MWF and intra-/extracellular water geometric mean T2 (gmT2 ). MWF estimates were more stable than myelin water gmT2 time across different settings of the T2 analysis. We observed that the lower limit of the T2 distribution grid should be slightly shorter than TE1 . Both TE1 and the acquisition echo spacing also have to be sufficiently short to capture the rapidly decaying myelin water T2 signal. Among all parameters of interest, the estimated MWF and intra-/extracellular water gmT2 differed by approximately 0.13-4 percentage points and 3-4 ms, respectively, from the true values, with larger deviations observed in the presence of greater B1+ inhomogeneities and at lower signal-to-noise ratio. Tailoring acquisition strategies may allow us to better characterize the T2 distribution, including the myelin water, in vivo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Wiggermann
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- UBC MRI Research Center, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - I M Vavasour
- UBC MRI Research Center, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - S H Kolind
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- UBC MRI Research Center, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- Department of Medicine (Division Neurology), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - A L MacKay
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- UBC MRI Research Center, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - G Helms
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund (IKVL), Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - A Rauscher
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- UBC MRI Research Center, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gruber I, Oberlechner E, Heck K, Hoopmann U, Böer B, Fugunt R, Gall C, Hartkopf AD, Helms G, Hoffmann SM, Ott C, Röhm C, Stäbler A, Wallwiener D, Brucker SY, Hahn M. Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy: Comparison of 16-Gauge versus 14-Gauge Needle and the Effect of Coaxial Guidance in 1065 Breast Biopsies - A Prospective Randomized Clinical Noninferiority Trial. Ultraschall Med 2020; 41:534-543. [PMID: 31791085 DOI: 10.1055/a-1014-2628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) is considered the standard assessment to diagnose sonographically visible suspicious breast mass lesions. Based on nonrandomized trials, the current German guidelines recommend at least three cylinders with ≤ 14-gauge needle biopsy. However, no recommendation is made as to how many specimens are needed with a smaller needle size, such as 16-gauge, or if biopsy with coaxial guidance improves diagnostic accuracy and quality. Therefore, in a prospective monocentric unblinded randomized controlled clinical noninferiority trial, the diagnostic accuracy of 16-gauge versus 14-gauge core needle biopsy, with and without coaxial guidance, was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS 1065 breast biopsies were included in order to analyze the number of core samples necessary to obtain an appropriate rate of diagnostic quality adequate for histological evaluation, and to achieve high diagnostic accuracy and diagnostic yield. Histological results were verified by surgery or long-term follow-up of at least two years up to five years. RESULTS In order to obtain an additive diagnostic accuracy of > 99 %, a minimum of two cylinders with 14-gauge biopsy were required. The diagnostic accuracy and the diagnostic quality of 14-gauge biopsy were not affected by the coaxial technique. When performing a 16-gauge biopsy, five cylinders were required to achieve an additive diagnostic accuracy of > 99 %. Without coaxial guidance, 16-gauge CNB required at least three samples, whereas five needle passes with coaxial-guided 16-gauge biopsy were needed. CONCLUSION The diagnostic accuracy and quality of ultrasound-guided 16-gauge core needle biopsy were inferior to the 14-gauge needle size, regardless of the use of a coaxial technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ines Gruber
- Department of Women's Health, University of Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Kerstin Heck
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum Stuttgart Olgahospital Frauenklinik, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Uta Hoopmann
- Department of Women's Health, University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Bettina Böer
- Department of Women's Health, University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Regina Fugunt
- Department of Women's Health, University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Christian Gall
- Department of Women's Health, University of Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Gisela Helms
- Department of Women's Health, University of Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Claudia Ott
- Department of Women's Health, University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Carmen Röhm
- Department of Women's Health, University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Annette Stäbler
- Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, University of Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Sara Y Brucker
- Department of Women's Health, University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Markus Hahn
- Department of Women's Health, University of Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gürgan S, Gruber I, Fugunt R, Sandru M, Helms G, Röhm C, Böer B, Hoopmann U, Hartkopf A, Hahn M. Das seltene Metastasierungsort: Intramammäre und cutane Metastasen des siegelringzelliges Magenkarzinoms. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2020. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1718274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- S Gürgan
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Tübingen
| | - I Gruber
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Tübingen
| | - R Fugunt
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Tübingen
| | - M Sandru
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Tübingen
| | - G Helms
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Tübingen
| | - C Röhm
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Tübingen
| | - B Böer
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Tübingen
| | | | | | - M Hahn
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Tübingen
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sandru M, Gruber I, Boer B, Fugunt R, Gürgan S, Heinecke V, Helms G, Hoopmann U, Röhm C, Hahn M. Evaluation eines DEGUM Mammasonographie-Qualitätszirkels. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2020. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1717873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- M Sandru
- Institut für Frauengesundheit Tübingen
| | - I Gruber
- Institut für Frauengesundheit Tübingen
| | - B Boer
- Institut für Frauengesundheit Tübingen
| | - R Fugunt
- Institut für Frauengesundheit Tübingen
| | - S Gürgan
- Institut für Frauengesundheit Tübingen
| | | | - G Helms
- Institut für Frauengesundheit Tübingen
| | | | - C Röhm
- Institut für Frauengesundheit Tübingen
| | - M Hahn
- Institut für Frauengesundheit Tübingen
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kolberg HC, Kühn T, Krajewska M, Bauerfeind I, Fehm TN, Fleige B, Helms G, Lebeau A, Stäbler A, Loibl S, Untch M, Kolberg-Liedtke C. Factors associated with axillary conversion after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAT) in initially node positive breast cancer patients – a transSENTINA analysis. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2020. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1714579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/22/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - TN Fehm
- Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf
| | | | - G Helms
- Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
| | - A Lebeau
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg - Eppendorf
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kolberg HC, Kühn T, Krajewska M, Bauerfeind I, Fehm TN, Fleige B, Helms G, Lebeau A, Staebler A, Loibl S, Untch M, Kolberg-Liedtke C. Factors associated with axillary conversion after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in initially node positive breast cancer patients: A transSENTINA analysis. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
567 Background: Current study concepts in early breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAT) are aiming at reducing morbidity by omission of axillary surgery in selected patients. Selection criteria for this strategy have to include the probability of conversion from cN1 to ycN0. We analyzed the association of clinical/pathological parameters and axillary conversion with data from arms C and D of the SENTINA trial (Kühn T et al., Lancet Oncol 2013). Methods: Patients were recruited to Arms C/D of the SENTINA trial in case they presented with clinically positive nodes before NAT. Based on their response to NAT they were then assigned to either arm C (clinically conversion to ycN0) or arm D (no clinical conversion (ycN+). In both the pre- and post-NAT scenarios, clinically involved lymph nodes were defined as palpable and/or suspect by ultrasound. Univariate logistic regression analyses were carried out to evaluate the association between clinical/pathological parameters and axillary conversion after NAT. Results: Of the 892 patients in arms C and D of the SENTINA trial 716 were evaluable for this analysis. After NAT, 593 patients converted to ycN0 and were therefore assigned to arm C; in contrast, 123 patients still had involved lymph nodes after NAT (ycN+) and were assigned to Arm D. Arms C and D were compared regarding the clinical/pathological parameters tumor diameter by ultrasound before and after NAT, grading, multifocality, ER status, PR status, HER2 status, pathological complete remission in the breast (breast pCR), morphology, lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and hemangiosis. Only small tumor diameter after NAT (p = 0.0038), achievement of breast pCR (p = 0.0001) and lack of LVI (p = 0.0009) were positively associated with axillary conversion from cN1 to ycN0 after NAT. Conclusions: Because of the small patient number in arm D, we were not able to identify an association between parameters of tumor biology (ER, PR, HER2 and TN status) and axillary conversion. However, favorable response of the primary tumor (represented both clinically by tumor diameter after NAT and pathologically by pCR in the breast) were positively associated with conversion from cN1 to ycN0. These results justify including patients with clinical and pathological response of the primary tumor in trials investigating de-escalation of axillary surgery after NAT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ingo Bauerfeind
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center, Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany
| | | | | | - Gisela Helms
- Universitatsklinikum Tubingen, Tubingen, Germany
| | - Annette Lebeau
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kolberg-Liedtke C, Kolberg HC, Krajewska M, Bauerfeind I, Fehm T, Fleige B, Helms G, Lebeau A, Staebler A, Loibl S, Untch M, Kühn T. Abstract P1-20-02: Axillary conversion rates according to breast cancer subtype among patients with pathological complete remission (pCR) in the breast after primary systemic therapy (PST) - A transSENTINA subproject. Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-p1-20-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Modern chemotherapy carries a high potential of converting patients with a clinically positive axilla (cN+) prior to PST to a clinically (ycN0) or even pathologically (ypN0) negative axilla after PST. Patients achieving a pathological complete remission (pCR) in the breast after PST carry a favorable prognosis including a high probability of axillary conversion. Among patients with highly chemosensitive tumors (i.e. high pCR rate), axillary staging may be adjusted accordingly.
Methods: In a retrospective study we analyzed the relation between breast pCR, nodal pCR and the intrinsic subtype in clinically node-positive patients who convert to ycN0. Arm C of the SENTINA trial included patients converting from cN+ to ycN0 through PST as part of a prospective study. Patients were categorized into luminal (HR+/HER2-), triple negative (TN; HR- / HER2-), triple positive (TP (HR+ / HER2+), and HER2 pos ER neg HER2 positive (HR- / HER2+) subgroups.
Results: Overall 416 of 596 patients were included (exclusions due to missing parameters) with 167 luminal, 119 TN, 77 TP and 56 HER2 pos ER neg HER2 positive tumors. Among all patients, pathological axillary conversion occurred in 154 (80.21%) and 91 (32.97%) cases among patients with and without pCR, respectively (odds ratio (OR) 0.23, p-value < .001). Among all subgroups, there was a significant increase in the probability of axillary conversion in case of pCR. Axillary conversion rates for patients with and without pCR were, respectively:
• TN 56 (84.85%) and 24 (45.28%)• TP 33 (73.33%) and 12 (37.50%)
• Luminal 18 (66.67%) and 34 (24.29%)
• HER2 pos ER neg 33 (91.67%) and 9 (45.00%)
We identified patient subgroups, among whom conversion rates were > 90%, i.e. among patients with (i) TN breast cancer and age at diagnosis < 50 years (91.89%) and (ii) HER2 pos ER negitive breast cancer and grade 3 disease (94.74%) or age > 50 years (94.44%).
Conclusion: Our analysis demonstrates that among patients with pCR, probabilities of axillary conversion were significantly higher among patients with pCR compared to patients without pCR. However, results differed according to biological breast cancer subtypes, with more aggressive subgroups presenting with higher probability of axillary conversion. We identified subgroups of patients among whom the rate of axillary residual disease after PST was lower compared to the false-negative rate of sentinel lymph node biopsy. Provided independent validation of our results, these subgroups may benefit from de-escalation of axillary stagingsurgery.
Citation Format: Cornelia Kolberg-Liedtke, Hans-Christian Kolberg, Maja Krajewska, Ingo Bauerfeind, Tanja Fehm, Barbara Fleige, Gisela Helms, Annette Lebeau, Annette Staebler, Sibylle Loibl, Michael Untch, Thorsten Kühn. Axillary conversion rates according to breast cancer subtype among patients with pathological complete remission (pCR) in the breast after primary systemic therapy (PST) - A transSENTINA subproject [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-20-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Tanja Fehm
- 4University Hospital, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hoffmann J, Marx M, Hengstmann A, Seeger H, Oberlechner E, Helms G, Röhm C, Ott C, Wallwiener D, Stäbler A, Wiesinger B, Hartkopf AD, Brucker SY, Hahn M. Ultrasound-Assisted Tumor Surgery in Breast Cancer - A Prospective, Randomized, Single-Center Study (MAC 001). Ultraschall Med 2019; 40:326-332. [PMID: 29975969 DOI: 10.1055/a-0637-1725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Breast-conserving therapy is associated with a risk of tumor-involved margins. For intraoperative orientation, non- palpable or indistinctly palpable lesions are wire-marked prior to surgery. Ultrasound-guided surgery has the potential to reduce the number of tumor-involved margins. In the MAC 001 trial we evaluated ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery compared to wire-guided surgery with regard to free tumor margins, duration of surgery and resection volume. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this randomized, prospective, single-center controlled trial, patients with ductal invasive breast cancer were recruited for either ultrasound-guided or wire localization surgery. Primary outcomes were tumor-free resection margins, the reoperation rate and the resection volume in each group. The results were analyzed by intention to treat. The trial was registered under ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02222675. RESULTS 56 patients were assessed, and 47 patients were evaluated in the trial. 93 % (25/27) of the patients in the ultrasound arm had an R0 reoperation compared to 65 % (13/20) in the wire localization control arm. This result was statistically significant (p = 0.026). No statistical difference was found for the resection volume or the duration of surgery between the two arms. No major complication was seen in either arm. CONCLUSION Ultrasound-assisted breast surgery significantly increases the possibility of tumor-free margins and therefore reduces the risk of reoperations. Breast surgeons should be trained in ultrasound and ultrasound should be available in every breast surgery operating room.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jürgen Hoffmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Mario Marx
- Department for Women's Health, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Andreas Hengstmann
- Department for Women's Health, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Harald Seeger
- Department for Women's Health, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Ernst Oberlechner
- Department for Women's Health, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Gisela Helms
- Department for Women's Health, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Carmen Röhm
- Department for Women's Health, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Claudia Ott
- Department for Women's Health, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Germany
| | | | - Annette Stäbler
- Department for Pathology and Neuropathology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany
| | | | - Andreas D Hartkopf
- Department for Women's Health, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Sara Y Brucker
- Department for Women's Health, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Markus Hahn
- Department for Women's Health, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kolberg HC, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Krajewska M, Bauerfeind I, Fehm TN, Fleige B, Helms G, Lebeau A, Staebler A, Loibl S, Untch M, Kuehn T. Association between tumor biology and occult lymph node metastases before and after primary neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for patients with early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
518 Background: Scientific efforts aim at a reduction of axillary morbidity through reduced axillary intervention among patients with early breast cancer. However, it is still unclear if this approach is feasible in all subtypes based on their risk of axillary involvement. We analyzed the association of tumor biology and occult axillary involvement with data from arms A and B of the SENTINA trial (Kühn T et al., Lancet Oncol 2013). Methods: Patients were included if they presented with a clinically negative axilla before NAT (arms A and B) and stratified according to tumor biology. All patients received SLNB before NAT, in cases of negative SLNB without further axillary surgery (Arm A) and in cases of positive SLNB (Arm B) with SLNB and axillary dissection after NAT. Logistic and linear regression analyses were carried out to evaluate the association between tumor biology and axillary involvement before and after NAT. Results: Of the 1022 patients in arms A and B of the SENTINA trial 926 were evaluable for this analysis. Of these, 27.9% had triple negative (TN), 16.3% hormone receptor (HR) and HER2 positive (triple positive = TP), 47.6% HR positive and HER2 negative (luminal) and 8.2% HR negative and HER2 positive (HER2) tumors. 39.7% of the luminal, 28.9% of the HER2, 19% of the TN and 47% of the TP tumors had involved SLN before NAT. Subgroup comparisons showed a significant difference between luminal and TN (p < 0.0001), whereas the differences between luminal and TP (p = 0.115) and HER2 (p = 0.077) were not statistically significant. The 317 patients with involved SLN prior to NAT received SLNB and axillary dissection after completion of NAT. The analysis after NAT showed trends for lower rates of involved lymph nodes for the high-risk groups (TN 20% / TP 14.3% / HER2 8.7%) compared to luminal tumors (27.6%) without reaching statistical significance. Conclusions: Our analysis demonstrates that among patients enrolled in the SENTINA trial, patients with triple negative disease have the lowest risk for occult lymph node metastases at initial presentation. Our results do not justify more intense local intervention among patients with triple negative breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ingo Bauerfeind
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center, Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany
| | | | | | - Gisela Helms
- Universitatsklinikum Tubingen, Tubingen, Germany
| | - Annette Lebeau
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group (GBG) and Centre for Haematology and Oncology Bethanien, Frankfurt, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kolberg HC, Liedtke C, Bauerfeind I, Fehm T, Fleige B, Hauschild M, Helms G, Lebeau A, Schmatloch S, Schrenk P, Schwentner L, Stäbler A, Loibl S, Untch M, Kühn T. Abstract PD8-02: Residual axillary involvement in early breast cancer in patients with positive sentinel nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-pd8-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background:The association between pathological complete remission (pCR) in the breast and clinical/pathological parameters is well established, whereas the role of these parameters in the prediction of residual axillary involvement after NACT is unclear. The goal is to identify a subset of patients who do not need axillary treatment. We used data from Arm B of the SENTINA trial to analyze this association.
Methods:Patients from arm B of the SENTINA trial with clinically and sonographically unsuspicious axillary nodes but with histologically proven involvement of SLNs prior to NACT were analyzed. All patients had SLNB and axillary dissection after NACT. Univariate analyses were performed to evaluate the association between clinical/pathological parameters and axillary involvement after NACT.
Results:Arm B of the SENTINA study contained 360 patients, 318 of which were evaluable with respect to the above parameters. After NACT 71/318 (22.3%) patients had involved SLNs or non-SLNs; 71/318 (22.3%) had a pCR in the breast. We observed a significant association between pCR in the breast and negative ER status, negative PR status, positive HER2 status, triple negative (TN) status, tumor size before and after NACT, multifocality, lobular morphology and axillary involvement after NACT. Regarding residual axillary burden only the associations with lobular morphology, extracapsular invasion, multifocality, positive HER2 status and pCR in the breast were statistically significant.
Conclusion:Our analysis demonstrates that patients enrolled in the SENTINA trial with clinically and sonographically unsuspicious axillary nodes but proven histological involvement of SLNs prior to NACT have positive axillary nodes in 22.3 % after NACT. This rate is confirming similar results from other groups. Although we found statistically significant associations between pCR in the breast and clinical/pathological parameters, only the association between lobular type, extracapsular invasion, positive HER2 status and pCR in the breast and residual axillary involvement after NACT were statistically significant. We cannot clearly identify a subset of patients for whom axillary treatment after NACT could be safely omitted if SLNs were positive. Our data are well in line with recently presented data demonstrating that the association between pCR in the breast and free axillary nodes after NACT is particularly strong in patients with TN and HER2 positive tumors. This question will be addressed in future trials currently under development.
Citation Format: Kolberg H-C, Liedtke C, Bauerfeind I, Fehm T, Fleige B, Hauschild M, Helms G, Lebeau A, Schmatloch S, Schrenk P, Schwentner L, Stäbler A, Loibl S, Untch M, Kühn T. Residual axillary involvement in early breast cancer in patients with positive sentinel nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD8-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H-C Kolberg
- Marienhospital Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany; Spital Rheinfelden, Rheinfelden, Switzerland; Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Elisabeth-Krankenhaus Kassel, Kassel, Germany; Kepler Universitätsklinikum, Linz, Austria; Gynova, Reith, Austria; German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - C Liedtke
- Marienhospital Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany; Spital Rheinfelden, Rheinfelden, Switzerland; Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Elisabeth-Krankenhaus Kassel, Kassel, Germany; Kepler Universitätsklinikum, Linz, Austria; Gynova, Reith, Austria; German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - I Bauerfeind
- Marienhospital Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany; Spital Rheinfelden, Rheinfelden, Switzerland; Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Elisabeth-Krankenhaus Kassel, Kassel, Germany; Kepler Universitätsklinikum, Linz, Austria; Gynova, Reith, Austria; German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - T Fehm
- Marienhospital Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany; Spital Rheinfelden, Rheinfelden, Switzerland; Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Elisabeth-Krankenhaus Kassel, Kassel, Germany; Kepler Universitätsklinikum, Linz, Austria; Gynova, Reith, Austria; German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - B Fleige
- Marienhospital Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany; Spital Rheinfelden, Rheinfelden, Switzerland; Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Elisabeth-Krankenhaus Kassel, Kassel, Germany; Kepler Universitätsklinikum, Linz, Austria; Gynova, Reith, Austria; German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - M Hauschild
- Marienhospital Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany; Spital Rheinfelden, Rheinfelden, Switzerland; Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Elisabeth-Krankenhaus Kassel, Kassel, Germany; Kepler Universitätsklinikum, Linz, Austria; Gynova, Reith, Austria; German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - G Helms
- Marienhospital Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany; Spital Rheinfelden, Rheinfelden, Switzerland; Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Elisabeth-Krankenhaus Kassel, Kassel, Germany; Kepler Universitätsklinikum, Linz, Austria; Gynova, Reith, Austria; German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - A Lebeau
- Marienhospital Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany; Spital Rheinfelden, Rheinfelden, Switzerland; Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Elisabeth-Krankenhaus Kassel, Kassel, Germany; Kepler Universitätsklinikum, Linz, Austria; Gynova, Reith, Austria; German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - S Schmatloch
- Marienhospital Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany; Spital Rheinfelden, Rheinfelden, Switzerland; Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Elisabeth-Krankenhaus Kassel, Kassel, Germany; Kepler Universitätsklinikum, Linz, Austria; Gynova, Reith, Austria; German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - P Schrenk
- Marienhospital Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany; Spital Rheinfelden, Rheinfelden, Switzerland; Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Elisabeth-Krankenhaus Kassel, Kassel, Germany; Kepler Universitätsklinikum, Linz, Austria; Gynova, Reith, Austria; German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - L Schwentner
- Marienhospital Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany; Spital Rheinfelden, Rheinfelden, Switzerland; Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Elisabeth-Krankenhaus Kassel, Kassel, Germany; Kepler Universitätsklinikum, Linz, Austria; Gynova, Reith, Austria; German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - A Stäbler
- Marienhospital Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany; Spital Rheinfelden, Rheinfelden, Switzerland; Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Elisabeth-Krankenhaus Kassel, Kassel, Germany; Kepler Universitätsklinikum, Linz, Austria; Gynova, Reith, Austria; German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - S Loibl
- Marienhospital Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany; Spital Rheinfelden, Rheinfelden, Switzerland; Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Elisabeth-Krankenhaus Kassel, Kassel, Germany; Kepler Universitätsklinikum, Linz, Austria; Gynova, Reith, Austria; German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - M Untch
- Marienhospital Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany; Spital Rheinfelden, Rheinfelden, Switzerland; Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Elisabeth-Krankenhaus Kassel, Kassel, Germany; Kepler Universitätsklinikum, Linz, Austria; Gynova, Reith, Austria; German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - T Kühn
- Marienhospital Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany; Spital Rheinfelden, Rheinfelden, Switzerland; Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Elisabeth-Krankenhaus Kassel, Kassel, Germany; Kepler Universitätsklinikum, Linz, Austria; Gynova, Reith, Austria; German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Liedtke C, Kolberg HC, Krajewska M, Bauerfeind I, Fehm T, Fleige B, Helms G, Lebeau A, Staebler A, Loibl S, Untch M, Kühn T. Abstract PD8-03: Conversion rates from positive to negative axillary involvement in breast cancer patients presenting with biopsy-proven axillary metastases prior to primary systemic therapy (PST) – A transSENTINA subproject. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-pd8-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background:
Modern chemotherapy carries a high potential of converting patients with clinically suspicious axillary nodes (cN+) prior to PST to clinically (ycN0) or pathologically (ypN0) negative nodes after PST. Clinical and sonographical axillary assessment, however, may be inadequate and therefore pathological assessment of suspicious axillary nodes is recommended. We analyzed the association between clinical / pathological parameters and positive to negative conversion in patients with biopsy-proven axillary metastases in Arm C of the SENTINA trial (i.e. patients with “true conversion”).
Methods:
Arm C of the SENTINA trial included patients converting from cN+ to ycN0 through PST from a prospective study. We limited our analysis to patients who had biopsy-proven axillary involvement. Univariate regression analysis was carried out to assess the association between patients with vs. without axillary disease after PST in i) patients with biopsy-proven involvement and ii) patients without biopsy proof of metastases.
Results:
Among 596 patients in arm C of the SENTINA trial with clinically and or sonographically suspicious ipsilateral axillary nodes, 439 (73,7%) 157 (26,3%) patients had a biopsy. In 152 patients (96,8%), lymph node metastases were confirmed and in 5 patients (3,2%), no malignant cells were identified. In both groups, we found a significant association (p<0,05) between increased rate of axillary conversion and small tumor diameter after PST, absence of multifocality, absence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI), ER and/or PR negativity, HER2 negativity, triple negative disease, and complete pathological response (pCR). No multiple testing corrections were performed due to an exploratory setting. However, only among patients with biopsy-proven involvement prior to PST, we found grade-3-tumors to be significantly associated with reduced probability of residual axillary involvement (76.1 vs. 33.8%, compared to G1 and G2, p=0.0323).
Conclusion:
Our analysis demonstrates that in patients with biopsy-proven axillary involvement before NST, parameters associated with axillary conversion are similar to those among patients classified as having nodal disease based on clinical and or sonographical assessment (cN+). Our analyses demonstrate that in biopsy-proven axillary metastases before NST, modern chemotherapy regimens result in significant rates of axillary conversion. This underscores the need to deescalate axillary staging / treatment with the goal to further avoid unnecessary axillary surgery.
Citation Format: Liedtke C, Kolberg H-C, Krajewska M, Bauerfeind I, Fehm T, Fleige B, Helms G, Lebeau A, Staebler A, Loibl S, Untch M, Kühn T. Conversion rates from positive to negative axillary involvement in breast cancer patients presenting with biopsy-proven axillary metastases prior to primary systemic therapy (PST) – A transSENTINA subproject [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD8-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Liedtke
- Charite Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Marienhospital Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum, Berlin-Buch, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - H-C Kolberg
- Charite Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Marienhospital Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum, Berlin-Buch, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - M Krajewska
- Charite Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Marienhospital Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum, Berlin-Buch, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - I Bauerfeind
- Charite Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Marienhospital Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum, Berlin-Buch, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - T Fehm
- Charite Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Marienhospital Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum, Berlin-Buch, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - B Fleige
- Charite Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Marienhospital Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum, Berlin-Buch, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - G Helms
- Charite Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Marienhospital Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum, Berlin-Buch, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - A Lebeau
- Charite Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Marienhospital Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum, Berlin-Buch, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - A Staebler
- Charite Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Marienhospital Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum, Berlin-Buch, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - S Loibl
- Charite Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Marienhospital Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum, Berlin-Buch, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - M Untch
- Charite Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Marienhospital Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum, Berlin-Buch, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - T Kühn
- Charite Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Marienhospital Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum, Berlin-Buch, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Liedtke C, Görlich D, Bauerfeind I, Fehm T, Fleige B, Helms G, Lebeau A, Staebler A, Ataseven B, Denkert C, Gerber B, Heil J, Krug D, Kümmel S, Schwentner L, von Minckwitz G, Loibl S, Untch M, Kühn T. Validation of a Nomogram Predicting Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Metastases among Patients with Breast Cancer after Primary Systemic Therapy - a transSENTINA Substudy. Breast Care (Basel) 2018; 13:440-446. [PMID: 30800039 DOI: 10.1159/000489565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Prediction of non-sentinel lymph node (SLN) status after primary systemic therapy (PST) may allow tailored axillary staging. The aim of this analysis was to compare established nomograms from i) the primary operative (n = 6) and ii) the neoadjuvant (n = 1) setting with an optimized nomogram to predict non-SLN status in patients after PST. Methods 181 patients converting from cN1 prior to PST to ycN0 but found to have a histologically positive SLN in the SENTINA trial were analyzed. Established models were applied. An optimized model was compiled using univariate and subsequent multivariable logistic regression (backward selection, likelihood ratio test). Results Area-under-the-curve (AUC) values from the primary operative models showed sufficient performance (0.82-0.71). For the neoadjuvant model, the AUC was found to be inferior to prior analyses (0.66) but within published confidence intervals. The SENTINA nomogram comprised the diameter of the largest lymph node (p = 0.006, odds ratio (OR) = 1.19), tumor size prior to PST (p = 0.085, OR = 1.31), and number of all positive SLN (p = 0.083, OR = 2.04). This model was validated using a separate cohort of arm C (n = 168, AUC 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.74-0.85). Conclusion We validated 7 models of prediction of non-SLN among patients showing axillary conversion through PST. Our own 'SENTINA nomogram' yielded AUC values comparable to previous nomograms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cornelia Liedtke
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Charite - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dennis Görlich
- Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Ingo Bauerfeind
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany
| | - Tanja Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Barbara Fleige
- Department of Pathology, Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Gisela Helms
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Centre Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Annette Lebeau
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Annette Staebler
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Centre Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Beyhan Ataseven
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bernd Gerber
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Jörg Heil
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Centre for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Lukas Schwentner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | | | | | - Michael Untch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Interdisciplinary Breast Centre, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Liedtke C, Kolberg HC, Kerschke L, Görlich D, Bauerfeind I, Fehm T, Fleige B, Helms G, Lebeau A, Stäbler A, Schmatloch S, Hausschild M, Schwentner L, von Minckwitz G, Loibl S, Untch M, Kühn T. Systematic analysis of parameters predicting pathological axillary status (ypN0 vs. ypN+) in patients with breast cancer converting from cN+ to ycN0 through primary systemic therapy (PST). Clin Exp Metastasis 2018; 35:777-783. [PMID: 30324492 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-018-9938-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2018] [Accepted: 09/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Optimization of axillary staging among patients converting from clinically node-positive disease to clinically node-negative disease through primary systemic therapy is needed. We aimed at developing a nomogram predicting the probability of positive axillary status after chemotherapy based on clinical/pathological parameters. Patients from study arm C of the SENTINA trial were included. Univariable/multivariable analyses were performed for 13 clinical/pathological parameters to predict a positive pathological axillary status after chemotherapy using logistic regression models. Odds ratios and 95%-confidence-intervals were reported. Model performance was assessed by leave-one-out cross-validation. Calculations were performed using the SAS Software (Version 9.4, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). 369 of 553 patients in Arm C were included in multivariable analysis. Stepwise backward variable selection based on a multivariable analysis resulted in a model including estrogen receptor (ER) status (odds ratio (OR) 3.916, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.318-6.615, p < 0.001), multifocality (OR 2.106, 95% CI 1.203-3.689, p = 0.0092), lymphovascular invasion (OR 9.196, 95% CI 4.734-17.864, p < 0.001), and sonographic tumor diameter after PST (OR 1.034, 95% CI 1.010-1.059, p = 0.0051). When validated, our model demonstrated an accuracy of 70.2% using 0.5 as cut-point. An area under the curve of 0.81 was calculated. The use of individual parameters as predictors of lymph node status after chemotherapy resulted in an inferior accuracy. Our model was able to predict the probability of a positive axillary nodal status with a high accuracy. The use of individual parameters showed reduced predictive performance. Overall, tumor biology was the strongest parameter in our models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Liedtke
- Department of Gynecology, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| | | | - L Kerschke
- Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, Münster, Germany
| | - D Görlich
- Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, Münster, Germany
| | - I Bauerfeind
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany
| | - T Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - B Fleige
- Department of Pathology, Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - G Helms
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Centre Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - A Lebeau
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - A Stäbler
- Department of Pathology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - M Hausschild
- Klinikum Rheinfelden, Schweiz, Rheinfelden, Switzerland
| | - L Schwentner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | | | - S Loibl
- German Breast Group, Neu Isenburg, Germany
| | - M Untch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - T Kühn
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Interdisciplinary Breast Centre, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bosse K, Oberlechner E, Hoffmann A, Fugunt R, Böer B, Gruber I, Helms G, Hoopmann U, Röhm C, Hartkopf A, Komoss S, Faust U, Pohle A, Dufke A, Nguyen H, Kehrer M, Schroeder C, Heinrich T, Rieß O, Staebler A, Vogel U, Taran FA, Brucker SY, Marx M, Wallwiener D, Hahn M. Prädiktive Testung bei Familienangehörigen von BRCA1, BRCA2 und CHEK2 Mutationsträgerinnen am Universitätsbrustzentrum Tübingen – eine klinische retrospektive unizentrische Kohortenstudie. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2018. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1671360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- K Bosse
- Department für Frauengesundheit, Universitätsfauenklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
- Institut für Medizinische Genetik und angewandte Genomik, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - E Oberlechner
- Department für Frauengesundheit, Universitätsfauenklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - A Hoffmann
- Department für Frauengesundheit, Universitätsfauenklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - R Fugunt
- Department für Frauengesundheit, Universitätsfauenklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - B Böer
- Department für Frauengesundheit, Universitätsfauenklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - I Gruber
- Department für Frauengesundheit, Universitätsfauenklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - G Helms
- Department für Frauengesundheit, Universitätsfauenklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - U Hoopmann
- Department für Frauengesundheit, Universitätsfauenklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - C Röhm
- Department für Frauengesundheit, Universitätsfauenklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - A Hartkopf
- Department für Frauengesundheit, Universitätsfauenklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - S Komoss
- Department für Frauengesundheit, Universitätsfauenklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - U Faust
- Institut für Medizinische Genetik und angewandte Genomik, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - A Pohle
- Institut für Medizinische Genetik und angewandte Genomik, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - A Dufke
- Institut für Medizinische Genetik und angewandte Genomik, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - H Nguyen
- Institut für Medizinische Genetik und angewandte Genomik, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - M Kehrer
- Institut für Medizinische Genetik und angewandte Genomik, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - C Schroeder
- Institut für Medizinische Genetik und angewandte Genomik, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - T Heinrich
- Institut für Medizinische Genetik und angewandte Genomik, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - O Rieß
- Institut für Medizinische Genetik und angewandte Genomik, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - A Staebler
- Institut für Pathologie und Neuropathologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - U Vogel
- Institut für Pathologie und Neuropathologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - FA Taran
- Department für Frauengesundheit, Universitätsfauenklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - SY Brucker
- Department für Frauengesundheit, Universitätsfauenklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - M Marx
- Department für Frauengesundheit, Universitätsfauenklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - D Wallwiener
- Department für Frauengesundheit, Universitätsfauenklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - M Hahn
- Department für Frauengesundheit, Universitätsfauenklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hahn M, Fugunt R, Schoenfisch B, Oberlechner E, Gruber I, Hoopmann U, Roehm C, Helms G, Taran F, Hartkopf A, Warzecha H, Wiesinger B, Brucker S, Boeer B. High intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for the treatment of symptomatic breast fibroadenoma. Int J Hyperthermia 2018; 35:463-470. [DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2018.1508757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- M. Hahn
- Department of Women’s Health, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - R. Fugunt
- Department of Women’s Health, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - B. Schoenfisch
- Research Institute for Women’s Health, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - E. Oberlechner
- Department of Women’s Health, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - I.V. Gruber
- Department of Women’s Health, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - U. Hoopmann
- Department of Women’s Health, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - C. Roehm
- Department of Women’s Health, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - G. Helms
- Department of Women’s Health, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - F.A. Taran
- Department of Women’s Health, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - A.D. Hartkopf
- Department of Women’s Health, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - H. Warzecha
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - B. Wiesinger
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - S.Y. Brucker
- Department of Women’s Health, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
- Research Institute for Women’s Health, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - B. Boeer
- Department of Women’s Health, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kolberg HC, Liedtke C, Bauerfeind I, Fehm TN, Fleige B, Hauschild M, Helms G, Lebeau A, Schmatloch S, Schrenk P, Schwentner L, Staebler A, Von Minckwitz G, Loibl S, Untch M, Kühn T. Association of clinical/pathological parameters with axillary involvement in early breast cancer in patients with limited sentinel node involvement (< 3 LK) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). J Clin Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ingo Bauerfeind
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center, Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Gisela Helms
- Universitatsklinikum Tubingen, Tubingen, Germany
| | - Annette Lebeau
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Michael Untch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Liedtke C, Kolberg HC, Kerschke L, Goerlich D, Bauerfeind I, Fehm TN, Fleige B, Hauschild M, Helms G, Lebeau A, Schmatloch S, Schrenk P, Schwentner L, Staebler A, Von Minckwitz G, Loibl S, Untch M, Kuehn T. Systematic analysis of parameters predicting pathological axillary status (ypN0 vs. ypN+) in patients converting from cN+ to ycN0 through primary systemic therapy (PST). J Clin Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
560 Background: Optimization of axillary staging in patients converting from cN+ to ycN0 through PST is needed. The aim of this analysis was to develop a nomogram predicting the probability of ypN+ after PST based on clinical/pathological parameters. Methods: Patients converting from cN+ to ycN0 through PST from a prospective study (SENTINA arm C) were included. Univariate/multivariate analyses were carried out for 14 clinical/pathological parameters to predict ypN+ using logistic regression models. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were reported. Model performance was assessed by leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV at .5 cut-offs) and ROC analyses. Calculations were performed using the SAS Software (Version 9.4). Results: 553 patients were assessed. Stepwise backward variable selection based on a multivariate analysis of all significant parameters resulted in a model (5M, Table, N = 369 evaluable) including ER (3.81; 2.25-6.44), multifocality (2.22; 1.26-3.92), LVI (9.16; 4.68-17.90), detection of SLN after PST (.50; .26-.95) and ycT (1.03; 1.01-1.06). In LOOCV, this model had an area under the curve of .81. Multivariate analysis of parameters available preoperatively showed an association between ypN0/ypN+, ER and ycT. Full subset selection resulted in a model (2M, N = 414) containing only ER (4.36; 2.80, 6.81) and ycT (1.04; 1.02, 1.07). Conclusions: A prediction model including parameters evaluable before/after definitive surgery resulted in a nomogram with acceptable accuracy. Limitation to parameters evaluable before surgery (i.e. ER, ycT) showed reduced accuracy that was comparable/superior to accuracy of using individual parameters. Since tumor biology was the strongest parameter in our models, we hypothesize that modern tumor biologic parameters such as gene expression profiling might optimize prediction of axillary status after PST improving patient counseling. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cornelia Liedtke
- University of Schleswig-Holstein Campus Luebeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Ingo Bauerfeind
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center, Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Gisela Helms
- Universitatsklinikum Tubingen, Tubingen, Germany
| | - Annette Lebeau
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Lukas Schwentner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics University Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Liedtke C, Kolberg HC, Kerschke L, Goerlich D, Bauerfeind I, Fehm T, Fleige B, Hauschild M, Helms G, Lebeau A, Schmatloch S, Schrenk P, Schwentner L, Staebler A, von Minckwitz G, Loibl S, Untch M, Kuehn T. Abstract P3-13-06: Development and validation of a nomogram predicting pathological axillary status (ypN0 vs. ypN+) in a subgroup of patients converting from cN+ to ycN0 through neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) – A transSENTINA substudy. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-p3-13-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Particularly among patients converting from cN+ to ycN0 status through neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) the optimal method and extent of axillary staging is unclear. The aim of this analysis was to develop a nomogram predicting the probability of positive axillary status (ypN+) after PST among these patients based on clinical and pathological parameters.
Methods:Patients converting from cN+ to ycN0 due to PST included in a prospective study (SENTINA, Arm C) were included. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out to evaluate the association between 14 clinical/pathological parameters and pathological axillary status (ypN0 vs ypN+) using logistic regression models. Model accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were assessed applying leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) and ROC analyses. Different cut-points were evaluated. Calculations were performed using the SAS Software (Version 9.4, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.).
Results: Arm C contained 553 patients, 369 patients were evaluable with respect to the above parameters. Univariate analyses revealed a significant association between pathological axillary status and ER status (odds ratio (OR) 4.05, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) 2.81-5.83), PR status (OR 3.07, 95%CI 2.16-4.36), multifocality (OR 2.37, 95%CI 1.57-3.58), lymphovascular invasion (OR 8.61, 95%CI 5.12-14.46), detection of a SLN after NAT (OR .56, 95%CI .36-.87), detection method (IHC vs routine: OR .46, 95%CI .27-.78; IHC vs serial HE: OR .72, 95%CI .49-1.07; serial hematoxylin eosin (HE) vs routine: OR .639, 95%CI .39-1.04), clinical tumor size (OR 1.051, 95%CI 1.03-1.07) and pCR-status in the breast (ypT0 and ypTis vs others, OR .11, 95%CI .08-.17). A multivariate model was fitted including significant clinical parameters. Stepwise backward variable selection was carried out resulting in a model including ER status (OR 3.81, 95%CI 2.25-6.44), multifocality (OR 2.22, 95%CI 1.26-3.92), LVI (OR 9.16, 95%CI 4.68-17.90), detection of a SLN after NAT (OR .50, 95%CI .26-.95) and clinical tumor size (OR 1.03, 95%CI 1.01-1.06). In LOOCV, this model demonstrated an accuracy of 73% (sensitivity 73%, specificity 72%, PPV 75%, NPV 70%) using .5 as cut-off. Based on the performed ROC analysis an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.81 was calculated.
Conclusion: A model using ER status, multifocality, LVI, detection of a SLN after NAT and clinical tumor size was built to predict pathological axillary status (ypN+) with a high accuracy. If successfully validated based upon an independent dataset, this nomogram could allow advising patients for / against axillary surgery in case of clinical axillary conversion after NAT.
Citation Format: Liedtke C, Kolberg H-C, Kerschke L, Goerlich D, Bauerfeind I, Fehm T, Fleige B, Hauschild M, Helms G, Lebeau A, Schmatloch S, Schrenk P, Schwentner L, Staebler A, von Minckwitz G, Loibl S, Untch M, Kuehn T. Development and validation of a nomogram predicting pathological axillary status (ypN0 vs. ypN+) in a subgroup of patients converting from cN+ to ycN0 through neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) – A transSENTINA substudy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-13-06.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Liedtke
- University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein / Campus Luebeck, Germany; Marien-Hospital Bottrop, Germany; University Hospital Münster, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Germany; University Hospital Duesseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Spital Rheinfelden, Switzerland; University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Hospital Kassel, Germany; AKH Linz, Germany; University Hospital Ulm, Germany; German Breast Group, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Germany
| | - H-C Kolberg
- University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein / Campus Luebeck, Germany; Marien-Hospital Bottrop, Germany; University Hospital Münster, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Germany; University Hospital Duesseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Spital Rheinfelden, Switzerland; University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Hospital Kassel, Germany; AKH Linz, Germany; University Hospital Ulm, Germany; German Breast Group, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Germany
| | - L Kerschke
- University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein / Campus Luebeck, Germany; Marien-Hospital Bottrop, Germany; University Hospital Münster, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Germany; University Hospital Duesseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Spital Rheinfelden, Switzerland; University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Hospital Kassel, Germany; AKH Linz, Germany; University Hospital Ulm, Germany; German Breast Group, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Germany
| | - D Goerlich
- University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein / Campus Luebeck, Germany; Marien-Hospital Bottrop, Germany; University Hospital Münster, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Germany; University Hospital Duesseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Spital Rheinfelden, Switzerland; University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Hospital Kassel, Germany; AKH Linz, Germany; University Hospital Ulm, Germany; German Breast Group, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Germany
| | - I Bauerfeind
- University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein / Campus Luebeck, Germany; Marien-Hospital Bottrop, Germany; University Hospital Münster, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Germany; University Hospital Duesseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Spital Rheinfelden, Switzerland; University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Hospital Kassel, Germany; AKH Linz, Germany; University Hospital Ulm, Germany; German Breast Group, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Germany
| | - T Fehm
- University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein / Campus Luebeck, Germany; Marien-Hospital Bottrop, Germany; University Hospital Münster, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Germany; University Hospital Duesseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Spital Rheinfelden, Switzerland; University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Hospital Kassel, Germany; AKH Linz, Germany; University Hospital Ulm, Germany; German Breast Group, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Germany
| | - B Fleige
- University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein / Campus Luebeck, Germany; Marien-Hospital Bottrop, Germany; University Hospital Münster, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Germany; University Hospital Duesseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Spital Rheinfelden, Switzerland; University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Hospital Kassel, Germany; AKH Linz, Germany; University Hospital Ulm, Germany; German Breast Group, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Germany
| | - M Hauschild
- University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein / Campus Luebeck, Germany; Marien-Hospital Bottrop, Germany; University Hospital Münster, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Germany; University Hospital Duesseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Spital Rheinfelden, Switzerland; University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Hospital Kassel, Germany; AKH Linz, Germany; University Hospital Ulm, Germany; German Breast Group, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Germany
| | - G Helms
- University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein / Campus Luebeck, Germany; Marien-Hospital Bottrop, Germany; University Hospital Münster, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Germany; University Hospital Duesseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Spital Rheinfelden, Switzerland; University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Hospital Kassel, Germany; AKH Linz, Germany; University Hospital Ulm, Germany; German Breast Group, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Germany
| | - A Lebeau
- University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein / Campus Luebeck, Germany; Marien-Hospital Bottrop, Germany; University Hospital Münster, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Germany; University Hospital Duesseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Spital Rheinfelden, Switzerland; University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Hospital Kassel, Germany; AKH Linz, Germany; University Hospital Ulm, Germany; German Breast Group, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Germany
| | - S Schmatloch
- University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein / Campus Luebeck, Germany; Marien-Hospital Bottrop, Germany; University Hospital Münster, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Germany; University Hospital Duesseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Spital Rheinfelden, Switzerland; University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Hospital Kassel, Germany; AKH Linz, Germany; University Hospital Ulm, Germany; German Breast Group, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Germany
| | - P Schrenk
- University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein / Campus Luebeck, Germany; Marien-Hospital Bottrop, Germany; University Hospital Münster, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Germany; University Hospital Duesseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Spital Rheinfelden, Switzerland; University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Hospital Kassel, Germany; AKH Linz, Germany; University Hospital Ulm, Germany; German Breast Group, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Germany
| | - L Schwentner
- University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein / Campus Luebeck, Germany; Marien-Hospital Bottrop, Germany; University Hospital Münster, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Germany; University Hospital Duesseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Spital Rheinfelden, Switzerland; University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Hospital Kassel, Germany; AKH Linz, Germany; University Hospital Ulm, Germany; German Breast Group, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Germany
| | - A Staebler
- University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein / Campus Luebeck, Germany; Marien-Hospital Bottrop, Germany; University Hospital Münster, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Germany; University Hospital Duesseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Spital Rheinfelden, Switzerland; University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Hospital Kassel, Germany; AKH Linz, Germany; University Hospital Ulm, Germany; German Breast Group, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Germany
| | - G von Minckwitz
- University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein / Campus Luebeck, Germany; Marien-Hospital Bottrop, Germany; University Hospital Münster, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Germany; University Hospital Duesseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Spital Rheinfelden, Switzerland; University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Hospital Kassel, Germany; AKH Linz, Germany; University Hospital Ulm, Germany; German Breast Group, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Germany
| | - S Loibl
- University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein / Campus Luebeck, Germany; Marien-Hospital Bottrop, Germany; University Hospital Münster, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Germany; University Hospital Duesseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Spital Rheinfelden, Switzerland; University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Hospital Kassel, Germany; AKH Linz, Germany; University Hospital Ulm, Germany; German Breast Group, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Germany
| | - M Untch
- University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein / Campus Luebeck, Germany; Marien-Hospital Bottrop, Germany; University Hospital Münster, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Germany; University Hospital Duesseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Spital Rheinfelden, Switzerland; University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Hospital Kassel, Germany; AKH Linz, Germany; University Hospital Ulm, Germany; German Breast Group, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Germany
| | - T Kuehn
- University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein / Campus Luebeck, Germany; Marien-Hospital Bottrop, Germany; University Hospital Münster, Germany; Klinikum Landshut, Germany; University Hospital Duesseldorf, Germany; Helios-Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Spital Rheinfelden, Switzerland; University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Hospital Kassel, Germany; AKH Linz, Germany; University Hospital Ulm, Germany; German Breast Group, Germany; Klinikum Esslingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Schwentner L, Helms G, Nekljudova V, Ataseven B, Bauerfeind I, Ditsch N, Fehm T, Fleige B, Hauschild M, Heil J, Kümmel S, Lebeau A, Schmatloch S, Schrenk P, Staebler A, Loibl S, Untch M, Von Minckwitz G, Liedtke C, Kühn T. Using ultrasound and palpation for predicting axillary lymph node status following neoadjuvant chemotherapy – Results from the multi-center SENTINA trial. Breast 2017; 31:202-207. [DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2016] [Revised: 11/10/2016] [Accepted: 11/11/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
25
|
Hoffmann S, Oberlechner E, Gruber I, Röhm C, Helms G, Marx M, Warzecha H, Staebler A, Wallwiener D, Brucker SY, Hahn M. Führt die präoperative zytologische oder histologische Sicherung sonographisch suspekter oder pathologischer Lymphknoten beim primären Mammakarzinom zu einer operativen Übertherapie? Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2016. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1592810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
26
|
Ott C, Brucker SY, Fugunt R, Hartkopf A, Helms G, Oberlechner E, Röhm C, Staebler A, Wiesinger B, Wittek B, Marx M, Hahn M. Ist eine Reduktion der Nachresektionsrate beim primären Mammakarzinom durch die intraoperative ultraschallassistierte Tumorresektion möglich? Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2016. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1592818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
27
|
Fugunt R, Helms G, Böer B, Dezulian J, Gruber IV, Hoopmann U, Ott C, Röhm C, Staebler A, Wiesinger B, Brucker SY, Hahn M. Die Gynäkomastie – eine interdisziplinäre Herausforderung. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2016. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1592831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
28
|
Boeer B, Brucker SY, Dezulian J, Fugunt R, Gruber I, Hartkopf A, Helms G, Hoopmann U, Kasperkowiak A, Marx M, Oberlechner E, Ott C, Röhm C, Hahn M. Ist die Behandlung von symptomatischen Fibroadenomen der Brust mittels sonographisch gesteuertem hochintensivem Ultraschall (HIFU) in Lokalanästhesie möglich? Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2016. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1592809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
29
|
Oberlechner E, Hoffmann S, Gruber I, Röhm C, Helms G, Ott C, Hoopmann U, Fugunt R, Böer B, Hartkopf A, Marx M, Vogel U, Staebler A, Preibsch H, Wiesinger B, Wallwiener D, Brucker SY, Hahn M. Ist die Axillasonografie (AUS) geeignet, eine erhöhte axilläre Tumorlast zu detektieren? Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2016. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1592813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
30
|
Bosse K, Jordan L, Gruber I, Hartkopf A, Helms G, Röhm C, Grischke EM, Hahn M, Brucker S, Wallwiener D, Oberlechner E. Häufigkeit der „erblichen Belastung für Brust- und Eierstockkrebs“ bei Patientinnen mit Mammakarzinom am Brustzentrum der Universitätsfrauenklinik Tübingen. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2016. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1592817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
31
|
Gruber I, Oberlechner E, Böer B, Fugunt R, Gall C, Hartkopf A, Helms G, Hoopmann U, Ott C, Röhm C, Stäbler A, Brucker SY, Hahn M. Inwiefern beeinflussen Nadelgröße und Nutzung der Coaxialkanüle die Treffsicherheit bei sonographischen Mamma-Stanzbiopsien? Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2016. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1592828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
32
|
Kaufmann AK, Vogel U, Meisner C, Krainick-Strobel U, Hattermann V, Wiesinger B, Wallwiener D, Helms G, Röhm C, Brucker S, Hahn M. Stellenwert bildgebender Verfahren zur Responsekontrolle unter Neoadjuvanter Chemotherapie. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2016. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1592822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
33
|
Schwentner L, Helms G, Nekljudova V, Ataseven B, Bauerfeind I, Ditsch N, Fehm TN, Fleige B, Hauschild M, Heil J, Kümmel S, Lebeau A, Liedtke C, Loibl S, Schmatloch S, Schrenk P, Staebler A, Untch M, Von Minckwitz G, Kühn T. Using ultrasound and palpation for predicting axillary lymph node status following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Results from the prospective multi-center SENTINA trial. J Clin Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.34.15_suppl.1054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Schwentner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics University Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Gisela Helms
- Universitatsklinikum Tubingen, Tubingen, Germany
| | | | - Beyhan Ataseven
- Department of Gynecology, Klinikum Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Ingo Bauerfeind
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology & Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center, Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Joerg Heil
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Heidelberg,, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sherko Kümmel
- Department of Senology / Breast Care Center, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Annette Lebeau
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Cornelia Liedtke
- University of Schleswig-Holstein Campus Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Wietek B, Schulze Temming-Hanhoff P, Pawlowski J, Wiesinger B, Helms G, Vogel U, Hahn M, Röhm C, Fend F, Nikolaou K, Staebler A. Einfluss der pathologischen und molekularen Parameter auf die Größenbestimmung des reinen DCIS in der präoperativen MR-Mammografie und Mammografie. ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG 2016. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1581630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
35
|
Hartkopf AD, Brucker SY, Helms G, Henzel M, Hahn M, Wallwiener M, Schoenfisch B, Taran FA, Fehm TN. Abstract P3-01-14: A nomogram to predict the likelihood of axillary non-sentinel lymph node metastases in sentinel lymph node positive primary breast cancer patients. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-p3-01-14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background:
Completion of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was long lasting standard in patients with non-metastatic primary breast cancer (PBC) and axillary sentinel lymph node (SLN) involvement. However, this approach is currently questioned since recent prospective trials have found that some SLN-positive women with PBC might not benefit from subsequent ALND. Nomograms that estimate the probability of further non-sentinel lymph node (NSLN) metastases could guide clinical decisions.
Methods:
We compared the predictability of three different nomograms (MSKCC, Stanford University, Cambridge) on the NSLN status with an own logistic regression model in a training and validation set. SLN-positive women who underwent primary surgery including ALND at Tuebingen University, Germany, between 06/2005 - 12/2009 (training set) and 01/2010 - 02/2012 (validation set) were available for this analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was calculated for each nomogram.
Results:
295 and 175 patients were included into the training and validation set, respectively. Of these 118 (40%) and 57 (33%) patients were NSLN-positive. Variables within our model were tumor size, proportion of positive SLNs, size of SLN metastases, lymphangiosis carcinomatosa, multicentricity and extracapsular invasion. The respective area under the ROC curve values for the MSKCC / Stanford University / Cambridge / own regression model were 0.73 / 0.70 / 0.63 / 0.75 in the training set and 0.73 / 0.66 / 0.52 / 0.73 in the validation set.
Conclusion:
The predictability of our logistic regression model was comparable to the MSKCC nomogram and superior to the Stanford University and Cambridge nomogram. Although a training and a validation set was used, further testing on an independent patient population is warranted.
Citation Format: Hartkopf AD, Brucker SY, Helms G, Henzel M, Hahn M, Wallwiener M, Schoenfisch B, Taran F-A, Fehm TN. A nomogram to predict the likelihood of axillary non-sentinel lymph node metastases in sentinel lymph node positive primary breast cancer patients. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-01-14.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- AD Hartkopf
- University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; University of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - SY Brucker
- University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; University of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - G Helms
- University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; University of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - M Henzel
- University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; University of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - M Hahn
- University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; University of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - M Wallwiener
- University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; University of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - B Schoenfisch
- University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; University of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - F-A Taran
- University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; University of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - TN Fehm
- University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; University of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Grischke EM, Röhm C, Hahn M, Helms G, Brucker S, Wallwiener D. ICG Fluorescence Technique for the Detection of Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer: Results of a Prospective Open-label Clinical Trial. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2015; 75:935-940. [PMID: 26500370 PMCID: PMC4596694 DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1557905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2014] [Revised: 06/25/2015] [Accepted: 06/25/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Detection of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) is the standard procedure to evaluate axillary lymph node status in breast cancer. In addition to known and established procedures such as the blue dye method and scintigraphy, this study investigated the efficacy of a method based on use of the fluorescent dye indocyanine green (ICG). Patients and Method: A total of 126 women with breast cancer histologically verified by punch biopsy were studied during surgical removal of SLN. In addition to SLN marking with technetium and scintigraphy, intra-individual comparison was done using indocyanine green (ICG) for marking instead of the standard blue dye. Results: Scintigraphy had a detection rate of 96 %; the detection rate with ICG was just under 89 %. A body mass index (BMI) > 40 was found to be a limiting factor for the fluorescent method. Investigation into potential toxicities associated with the use of the fluorescent dye ICG revealed no systemic or even local side effects. The fluorescent method was found to be significantly less expensive than the scintigraphy method. Conclusion: The ICG fluorescence technique for the detection of SLN was found to be a valid and feasible method in clinical practice when compared directly with the blue dye method and scintigraphy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - C. Röhm
- Universitäts-Frauenklinik Tübingen, Tübingen
| | - M. Hahn
- Universitäts-Frauenklinik Tübingen, Tübingen
| | - G. Helms
- Universitäts-Frauenklinik Tübingen, Tübingen
| | - S. Brucker
- Universitäts-Frauenklinik Tübingen, Tübingen
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Lorio S, Lutti A, Kherif F, Ruef A, Dukart J, Chowdhury R, Frackowiak RS, Ashburner J, Helms G, Weiskopf N, Draganski B. Disentangling in vivo the effects of iron content and atrophy on the ageing human brain. Neuroimage 2014; 103:280-289. [PMID: 25264230 PMCID: PMC4263529 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.09.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2014] [Revised: 09/15/2014] [Accepted: 09/17/2014] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Evidence from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies shows that healthy aging is associated with profound changes in cortical and subcortical brain structures. The reliable delineation of cortex and basal ganglia using automated computational anatomy methods based on T1-weighted images remains challenging, which results in controversies in the literature. In this study we use quantitative MRI (qMRI) to gain an insight into the microstructural mechanisms underlying tissue ageing and look for potential interactions between ageing and brain tissue properties to assess their impact on automated tissue classification. To this end we acquired maps of longitudinal relaxation rate R1, effective transverse relaxation rate R2* and magnetization transfer - MT, from healthy subjects (n=96, aged 21-88 years) using a well-established multi-parameter mapping qMRI protocol. Within the framework of voxel-based quantification we find higher grey matter volume in basal ganglia, cerebellar dentate and prefrontal cortex when tissue classification is based on MT maps compared with T1 maps. These discrepancies between grey matter volume estimates can be attributed to R2* - a surrogate marker of iron concentration, and further modulation by an interaction between R2* and age, both in cortical and subcortical areas. We interpret our findings as direct evidence for the impact of ageing-related brain tissue property changes on automated tissue classification of brain structures using SPM12. Computational anatomy studies of ageing and neurodegeneration should acknowledge these effects, particularly when inferring about underlying pathophysiology from regional cortex and basal ganglia volume changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Lorio
- LREN, Dept. of Clinical Neurosciences, CHUV, University of Lausanne, Lausanne Switzerland
| | - A Lutti
- LREN, Dept. of Clinical Neurosciences, CHUV, University of Lausanne, Lausanne Switzerland
| | - F Kherif
- LREN, Dept. of Clinical Neurosciences, CHUV, University of Lausanne, Lausanne Switzerland
| | - A Ruef
- LREN, Dept. of Clinical Neurosciences, CHUV, University of Lausanne, Lausanne Switzerland
| | - J Dukart
- LREN, Dept. of Clinical Neurosciences, CHUV, University of Lausanne, Lausanne Switzerland
| | - R Chowdhury
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, UCL Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK
| | - R S Frackowiak
- LREN, Dept. of Clinical Neurosciences, CHUV, University of Lausanne, Lausanne Switzerland
| | - J Ashburner
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, UCL Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK
| | - G Helms
- University Medical Centre, UMG, Dept. of Cognitive Neurology, Göttingen, Germany
| | - N Weiskopf
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, UCL Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK
| | - B Draganski
- LREN, Dept. of Clinical Neurosciences, CHUV, University of Lausanne, Lausanne Switzerland; Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Liedtke C, Goerlich D, Bauerfeind I, Fehm T, Fleige B, Helms G, Lebeau A, Staebler A, Minckwitz GV, Untch M, Kühn T. Validierung eines Nomogramms zur Prädiktion von Non-Sentinellymphknoten-Metastasen bei Patientinnen mit primär-systemischer Therapie (PST) – eine transSENTINA Substudie. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2014. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1388447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
|
39
|
Liedtke C, Goerlich D, Bauerfeind I, Fehm T, Fleige B, Helms G, Lebeau A, Staebler A, Von Minckwitz G, Untch M, Kuehn T. Validation of a nomogram predicting nonsentinel lymphnode metastases among patients with breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT): A transSENTINA substudy. J Clin Oncol 2014. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.e12022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Cornelia Liedtke
- University of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany
| | | | - Ingo Bauerfeind
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology & Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center, Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany
| | - Tanja Fehm
- University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Gisela Helms
- Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Dreha-Kulaczewski S, Kalscheuer V, Tzschach A, Hu H, Helms G, Brockmann K, Weddige A, Dechent P, Schlüter G, Krätzner R, Ropers HH, Gärtner J, Zirn B. A Novel SLC6A8 Mutation in a Large Family with X-Linked Intellectual Disability: Clinical and Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Data of Both Hemizygous Males and Heterozygous Females. JIMD Rep 2013; 13:91-9. [PMID: 24190795 DOI: 10.1007/8904_2013_261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2013] [Revised: 08/14/2013] [Accepted: 09/02/2013] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
X-linked creatine transport (CRTR) deficiency, caused by mutations in the SLC6A8 gene, leads to intellectual disability, speech delay, epilepsy, and autistic behavior in hemizygous males. Additional diagnostic features are depleted brain creatine levels and increased creatine/creatinine ratio (cr/crn) in urine. In heterozygous females the phenotype is highly variable and diagnostic hallmarks might be inconclusive. This survey aims to explore the intrafamilial variability of clinical and brain proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) findings in males and females with CRTR deficiency. X-chromosome exome sequencing identified a novel missense mutation in the SLC6A8 gene (p.G351R) in a large family with X-linked intellectual disability. Detailed clinical investigations including neuropsychological assessment, measurement of in vivo brain creatine concentrations using quantitative MRS, and analyses of creatine metabolites in urine were performed in five clinically affected family members including three heterozygous females and one hemizygous male confirming the diagnosis of CRTR deficiency. The severe phenotype of the hemizygous male was accompanied by most distinct aberrations of brain creatine concentrations (-83% in gray and -79% in white matter of age-matched normal controls) and urinary creatine/creatinine ratio. In contrast, the heterozygous females showed varying albeit generally milder phenotypes with less severe brain creatine (-50% to -33% in gray and -45% to none in white matter) and biochemical urine abnormalities. An intrafamilial correlation between female phenotype, brain creatine depletion, and urinary creatine abnormalities was observed. The combination of powerful new technologies like exome-next-generation sequencing with thorough systematic evaluation of patients will further expand the clinical spectrum of neurometabolic diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Dreha-Kulaczewski
- Department of Pediatrics and Pediatric Neurology, University Medicine Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Liedtke C, Goerlich D, Van Zee KJ, Korndoerfer J, Bauerfeind I, Fehm TN, Fleige B, Helms G, Lebeau A, Mai M, Staebler A, Von Minckwitz G, Untch M, Kühn T. Predicting nonsentinel lymph node metastases using established nomograms among patients with breast cancer after primary systemic therapy (PST): The transSENTINA substudy. J Clin Oncol 2013. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.1020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
1020 Background: Recent studies such as the SENTINA trial suggest that performing SLNB in patients with a cN1 status before but converting to a ycN0 status through PST result more often in a false-negative evaluation of LN status compared to SLNB at primary surgery. Therefore, there is a need to predict non-SLN status after PST and tailor axillary staging procedures. We investigated the accuracy of established nomograms to predict non-SLN metastases at primary surgery in patients after PST. Methods: The SENTINA trial is a 4-arm prospective multicenter cohort study evaluating an algorithm for the timing of a standardized SLNB in patients undergoing PST. 1,737 pts. from 104 institutions were categorized into four treatment arms according to the clinical axillary staging (including ultrasound examination) before and after chemotherapy. Patients in arm C with a cN1 status prior to PST converting to a ycN0 status but found to have a histologically positive SLN after PST were included. Several published nomograms predicting non-SLN status in patients with a positive SLN at primary surgery were applied (including the MSKCC-, Mayo-, Cambridge-, and Stanford-Nomogram, MDA-Score and Tenon-Score) and Area-under-the-Curve-(AUC)-values were calculated. Results:This subgroup comprised 592 patients. Among these, 74 patients had a positive SLN after PST and had all available data to run the nomograms. AUC-values were: MSKCC: 82.3 (95% confidence interval (95%CI) 72.6-91.9), Mayo: 71.8 (95%CI 60.1-83.5), Cambridge: 71.5 (95%CI 59.7-83.2), Stanford 70.6 (95%CI 59.7-83.2), MDA 70.7 (95%CI 59.0-82.5), and Tenon 73.1 (61.5-84.7). Conclusions: Analysis of the above nomograms in the post-neoadjuvant setting yielded AUC values comparable to those in the setting of primary surgery. Our results suggest that nomograms predicting non-SLN status in the setting of primary surgery (and particularly the MSKCC nomogram) may be used to avoid full axillary dissection in patients after PST.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cornelia Liedtke
- University of Schleswig-Holstein / Campus Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Ingo Bauerfeind
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology & Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center, Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany
| | - Tanja N Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Gisela Helms
- Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Kuehn T, Bauerfeind I, Fehm T, Fleige B, Hausschild M, Helms G, Lebeau A, Liedtke C, von Minckwitz G, Nekljudova V, Schmatloch S, Schrenk P, Staebler A, Untch M. Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy in patients with breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (SENTINA): a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2013; 14:609-18. [PMID: 23683750 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70166-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 862] [Impact Index Per Article: 78.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimum timing of sentinel-lymph-node biopsy for breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy is uncertain. The SENTINA (SENTinel NeoAdjuvant) study was designed to evaluate a specific algorithm for timing of a standardised sentinel-lymph-node biopsy procedure in patients who undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS SENTINA is a four-arm, prospective, multicentre cohort study undertaken at 103 institutions in Germany and Austria. Women with breast cancer who were scheduled for neoadjuvant chemotherapy were enrolled into the study. Patients with clinically node-negative disease (cN0) underwent sentinel-lymph-node biopsy before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (arm A). If the sentinel node was positive (pN1), a second sentinel-lymph-node biopsy procedure was done after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (arm B). Women with clinically node-positive disease (cN+) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Those who converted to clinically node-negative disease after chemotherapy (ycN0; arm C) were treated with sentinel-lymph-node biopsy and axillary dissection. Only patients whose clinical nodal status remained positive (ycN1) underwent axillary dissection without sentinel-lymph-node biopsy (arm D). The primary endpoint was accuracy (false-negative rate) of sentinel-lymph-node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients who converted from cN1 to ycN0 disease during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (arm C). Secondary endpoints included comparison of the detection rate of sentinel-lymph-node biopsy before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and also the false-negative rate and detection rate of sentinel-lymph-node biopsy after removal of the sentinel lymph node. Analyses were done according to treatment received (per protocol). FINDINGS Of 1737 patients who received treatment, 1022 women underwent sentinel-lymph-node biopsy before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (arms A and B), with a detection rate of 99.1% (95% CI 98.3-99.6; 1013 of 1022). In patients who converted after neoadjuvant chemotherapy from cN+ to ycN0 (arm C), the detection rate was 80.1% (95% CI 76.6-83.2; 474 of 592) and false-negative rate was 14.2% (95% CI 9.9-19.4; 32 of 226). The false-negative rate was 24.3% (17 of 70) for women who had one node removed and 18.5% (10 of 54) for those who had two sentinel nodes removed (arm C). In patients who had a second sentinel-lymph-node biopsy procedure after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (arm B), the detection rate was 60.8% (95% CI 55.6-65.9; 219 of 360) and the false-negative rate was 51.6% (95% CI 38.7-64.2; 33 of 64). INTERPRETATION Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy is a reliable diagnostic method before neoadjuvant chemotherapy. After systemic treatment or early sentinel-lymph-node biopsy, the procedure has a lower detection rate and a higher false-negative rate compared with sentinel-lymph-node biopsy done before neoadjuvant chemotherapy. These limitations should be considered if biopsy is planned after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. FUNDING Brustkrebs Deutschland, German Society for Senology, German Breast Group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thorsten Kuehn
- Interdisciplinary Breast Centre, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Menke J, Helms G, Larsen J. Betrachtung der effektiven k-Raum-Abdeckung von MR-Bildern: Phantom-Experimente mit Anwendung der Fast-Fourier-Transformation. ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG 2013. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1346433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
44
|
Menke J, Helms G, Larsen J. Betrachtung der effektiven k-Raum-Abdeckung von MR-Bildern: Phantom-Experimente mit Anwendung der Fast-Fourier-Transformation. ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG 2013. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1346603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
45
|
Focke N, Diederich C, Helms G, Nitsche M, Lerche H, Paulus W. Diffusions-Tensor Bildgebung detektiert ausgeprägte Veränderungen der weißen Substanz bei idiopathischer generalisierter Epilepsie. KLIN NEUROPHYSIOL 2013. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1337215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
46
|
Krause P, Flikweert H, Monin M, Seif Amir Hosseini A, Helms G, Cantanhede G, Ghadimi BM, Koenig S. Increased growth of colorectal liver metastasis following partial hepatectomy. Clin Exp Metastasis 2013; 30:681-93. [PMID: 23385555 PMCID: PMC3663204 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-013-9572-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2012] [Accepted: 01/22/2013] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Nearly 50 % of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients develop liver metastases with liver resection being the only option to cure patients. Residual micrometastases or circulating tumor cells are considered a cause of tumor relapse. This work investigates the influence of partial hepatectomy (PH) on the growth and molecular composition of CRC liver metastasis in a syngeneic rat model. One million CC531 colorectal tumor cells were implanted via the portal vein in WAG/Rij rats followed by a 30 % PH a day later. Control groups either received tumor cells followed by a sham-operation or were injected with a buffer solution followed by PH. Animals were examined with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and liver tissues were processed for immunolabeling and PCR analysis. One-third PH was associated with an almost threefold increase in relative tumor mass (MRI volumetry: 2.8-fold and transcript levels of CD44: 2.3-fold). Expression of molecular markers for invasiveness and aggressiveness (CD49f, CXCR4, Axin2 and c-met) was increased following PH, however with no significant differences when referring to the relative expression levels (relating to tumor mass). Liver metastases demonstrated a significantly higher proliferation rate (Ki67) 2 weeks following PH and cell divisions also increased in the surrounding liver tissue. Following PH, the stimulated growth of metastases clearly exceeded the compensation in liver volume with long-lasting proliferative effects. However, the distinct tumor composition was not influenced by liver regeneration. Future investigations should focus on the inhibition of cell cycle (i.e. systemic therapy strategies, irradiation) to hinder liver regeneration and therefore restrain tumor growth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Krause
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Medical Centre, Georg-August-University Goettingen, Robert-Koch-Strasse 40, 37075, Goettingen, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Dreha‐Kulaczewski SF, Brockmann K, Henneke M, Dechent P, Wilken B, Gärtner J, Helms G. Assessment of myelination in hypomyelinating disorders by quantitative MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012. [DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Steffi F. Dreha‐Kulaczewski
- Department of Pediatrics and Pediatric Neurology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany
- Department of Cognitive Neurology, MR‐Research in Neurology and Psychiatry, University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany
| | - Knut Brockmann
- Department of Pediatrics and Pediatric Neurology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany
| | - Marco Henneke
- Department of Pediatrics and Pediatric Neurology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany
| | - Peter Dechent
- Department of Cognitive Neurology, MR‐Research in Neurology and Psychiatry, University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany
| | - Bernd Wilken
- Department of Pediatric Neurology, Klinikum Kassel, Kassel, Germany
| | - Jutta Gärtner
- Department of Pediatrics and Pediatric Neurology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany
| | - G. Helms
- Department of Cognitive Neurology, MR‐Research in Neurology and Psychiatry, University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Dreha‐Kulaczewski SF, Brockmann K, Henneke M, Dechent P, Wilken B, Gärtner J, Helms G. Assessment of myelination in hypomyelinating disorders by quantitative MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012; 36:1329-38. [DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2012] [Accepted: 07/12/2012] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Steffi F. Dreha‐Kulaczewski
- Department of Pediatrics and Pediatric Neurology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany
- Department of Cognitive Neurology, MR‐Research in Neurology and Psychiatry, University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany
| | - Knut Brockmann
- Department of Pediatrics and Pediatric Neurology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany
| | - Marco Henneke
- Department of Pediatrics and Pediatric Neurology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany
| | - Peter Dechent
- Department of Cognitive Neurology, MR‐Research in Neurology and Psychiatry, University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany
| | - Bernd Wilken
- Department of Pediatric Neurology, Klinikum Kassel, Kassel, Germany
| | - Jutta Gärtner
- Department of Pediatrics and Pediatric Neurology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany
| | - G. Helms
- Department of Cognitive Neurology, MR‐Research in Neurology and Psychiatry, University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Kühn T, Bauerfeind I, Fehm T, Helms G, Lebeau A, Liedtke C, Mai M, Nekljudova V, Schrenk P, Untch M. 6 Impact of Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment and Prior Surgery On Sentinel Lymph Node Detection – Results From the Prospective German Multiinstitutional SENTINa Trial. Eur J Cancer 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(12)70074-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
50
|
Focke NK, Helms G, Pantel PM, Scheewe S, Knauth M, Bachmann CG, Ebentheuer J, Dechent P, Paulus W, Trenkwalder C. Differentiation of typical and atypical Parkinson syndromes by quantitative MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32:2087-92. [PMID: 21998102 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a2865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The differential diagnosis of Parkinson syndromes remains a major challenge. Quantitative MR imaging can aid in this classification, but it is unclear which of the proposed techniques is best suited for this task. We, therefore, conducted a head-to-head study with different quantitative MR imaging measurements in patients with IPS, MSA-type Parkinson, PSP, and healthy elderly controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty-one patients and 13 controls underwent a comprehensive quantitative MR imaging protocol including R2*-, R2- and R1-mapping, magnetization transfer, and DTI with manual region-of-interest measurements in basal ganglia regions. Group differences were assessed with a post hoc ANOVA with a Bonferroni error correction and an ROC. RESULTS The best separation of MSA from IPS in patients and controls could be achieved with R2*-mapping in the PU, with an ROC AUC of ≤0.96, resulting in a sensitivity of 77.8% (with a specificity 100%). MD was increased in patients with PSP compared with controls and to a lesser extent compared with those with IPS and MSA in the SN. CONCLUSIONS Among the applied quantitative MR imaging methods, R2*-mapping seems to have the best predictive power to separate patients with MSA from those with IPS, and DTI for identifying PSP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N K Focke
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Georg-August University Gottingen, Gottingen, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|