1
|
Villalobos A, Alaimo K, Erickson C, Harrall K, Glueck D, Buchenau H, Buchenau M, Coringrato E, Decker E, Fahnestock L, Hamman R, Hebert J, Hurley T, Leiferman J, Li K, Quist P, Litt J. CAPS on the move: Crafting an approach to recruitment for a randomized controlled trial of community gardening. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2019; 16:100482. [PMID: 31799473 PMCID: PMC6883325 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2019] [Revised: 10/18/2019] [Accepted: 10/24/2019] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe and evaluate recruitment approaches for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of community gardening in Denver, Colorado. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03089177). METHODS We used community and staff feedback to adapt our recruitment approach from year 1 to year 2 of a multi-year RCT to address health behaviors related to cancer prevention. In year 2, we added a full-time recruitment coordinator, designed and implemented a tracking spreadsheet, and engaged advisory committee members, local garden leaders, and health partners in planning and outreach. Screening and consent rates, staff time and costs for years 1 and 2 are compared. RESULTS In year 1, recruitment methods yielded 136 initial contacts, 106 screenings and 64 consented participants. In year 2, enhanced staffing and outreach yielded 257 initial contacts, 193 screenings, and 123 consented participants. Personal referrals, health fairs, NextDoor, and fliers yielded the highest percentage of consented participants. School and community meetings yielded the lowest yield for potential participants. Spanish-speaking participants were mostly recruited by direct methods. Compared to year 1 recruitment, which required 707 h of staff time and cost $14,446, year 2 recruitment required 1224 h of staff time and cost $22,992. Average cost for retained participants was $226 (year 1) and $186 (year 2). DISCUSSION Those planning pragmatic clinical trials with recruitment in multi-ethnic communities can use the results from this study to understand the efficacy of techniques, and to budget costs for recruitment. While our culturally-tailored recruitment methods cost more, they provided more effective and efficient ways to reach recruitment goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - K. Alaimo
- Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - C. Erickson
- University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - K.K. Harrall
- Colorado School of Public Health, Denver, CO, USA
| | - D.H. Glueck
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA
| | - H. Buchenau
- University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
| | | | | | - E. Decker
- University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
| | | | - R.F. Hamman
- Colorado School of Public Health, Denver, CO, USA
- LEAD Center, Colorado School of Public Health, Denver, CO, USA
| | - J.R. Hebert
- University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - T.G. Hurley
- University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | | | - K. Li
- Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - P. Quist
- University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - J.S. Litt
- University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
- Colorado School of Public Health, Denver, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|