Evaluation of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) Samples from Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer for Whole Genome, Whole Exome and Comprehensive Panel Sequencing

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is often the only source of tumor tissue from patients with advanced, inoperable lung cancer. EBUS-TBNA aspirates are used for the diagnosis, staging, and genomic testing to inform therapy options. Here we extracted DNA and RNA from 220 EBUS-TBNA aspirates to evaluate their suitability for whole genome (WGS), whole exome (WES), and comprehensive panel sequencing. For a subset of 40 cases, the same nucleic acid extraction was sequenced using WGS, WES, and the TruSight Oncology 500 assay. Genomic features were compared between sequencing platforms and compared with those reported by clinical testing. A total of 204 aspirates (92.7%) had sufficient DNA (100 ng) for comprehensive panel sequencing, and 109 aspirates (49.5%) had sufficient material for WGS. Comprehensive sequencing platforms detected all seven clinically reported tier 1 actionable mutations, an additional three (7%) tier 1 mutations, six (15%) tier 2-3 mutations, and biomarkers of potential immunotherapy benefit (tumor mutation burden and microsatellite instability). As expected, WGS was more suited for the detection and discovery of emerging novel biomarkers of treatment response. WGS could be performed in half of all EBUS-TBNA aspirates, which points to the enormous potential of EBUS-TBNA as source material for large, well-curated discovery-based studies for novel and more effective predictors of treatment response. Comprehensive panel sequencing is possible in the vast majority of fresh EBUS-TBNA aspirates and enhances the detection of actionable mutations over current clinical testing.

Targeted Hyperbranched Nanoparticles for Delivery of Doxorubicin in Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis

Breast cancer brain metastases (BM) are associated with a dismal prognosis and very limited treatment options. Standard chemotherapy is challenging in BM patients because the high dosage required for an effective outcome causes unacceptable systemic toxicities, a consequence of poor brain penetration, and a short physiological half-life. Nanomedicines have the potential to circumvent off-target toxicities and factors limiting the efficacy of conventional chemotherapy. The HER3 receptor is commonly expressed in breast cancer BM. Here, we investigate the use of hyperbranched polymers (HBP) functionalized with a HER3 bispecific-antibody fragment for cancer cell-specific targeting and pH-responsive release of doxorubicin (DOX) to selectively deliver and treat BM. We demonstrated that DOX-release from the HBP carrier was controlled, gradual, and greater in endosomal acidic conditions (pH 5.5) relative to physiologic pH (pH 7.4). We showed that the HER3-targeted HBP with DOX payload was HER3-specific and induced cytotoxicity in BT474 breast cancer cells (IC50: 17.6 μg/mL). Therapeutic testing in a BM mouse model showed that HER3-targeted HBP with DOX payload impacted tumor proliferation, reduced tumor size, and prolonged overall survival. HER3-targeted HBP level detected in ex vivo brain samples was 14-fold more than untargeted-HBP. The HBP treatments were well tolerated, with less cardiac and oocyte toxicity compared to free DOX. Taken together, our HER3-targeted HBP nanomedicine has the potential to deliver chemotherapy to BM while reducing chemotherapy-associated toxicities.

Discrepancies in tumor mutation burden reporting from sequential endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration samples within single lymph node stations - brief report

Introduction

Tumour Mutation Burden (TMB) is a potential biomarker for immune cancer therapies. Here we investigated parameters that might affect TMB using duplicate cytology smears obtained from endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS TBNA)-sampled malignant lymph nodes.

Methods

Individual Diff-Quik cytology smears were prepared for each needle pass. DNA extracted from each smear underwent sequencing using large gene panel (TruSight Oncology 500 (TSO500 - Illumina)). TMB was estimated using the TSO500 Local App v. 2.0 (Illumina).

Results

Twenty patients had two or more Diff-Quik smears (total 45 smears) which passed sequencing quality control. Average smear TMB was 8.7 ± 5.0 mutations per megabase (Mb). Sixteen of the 20 patients had paired samples with minimal differences in TMB score (average difference 1.3 ± 0.85). Paired samples from 13 patients had concordant TMB (scores below or above a threshold of 10 mutations/Mb). Markedly discrepant TMB was observed in four cases, with an average difference of 11.3 ± 2.7 mutations/Mb. Factors affecting TMB calling included sample tumour content, the amount of DNA used in sequencing, and bone fide heterogeneity of node tumour between paired samples.

Conclusion

TMB assessment is feasible from EBUS-TBNA smears from a single needle pass. Repeated samples of a lymph node station have minimal variation in TMB in most cases. However, this novel data shows how tumour content and minor change in site of node sampling can impact TMB. Further study is needed on whether all node aspirates should be combined in 1 sample, or whether testing independent nodes using smears is needed.

Whole Genome Sequencing in Advanced Lung Cancer can be Performed Using Diff-Quik Cytology Smears Derived from Endobronchial Ultrasound, Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS TBNA)

INTRODUCTION

Maximising alternative sample types for genomics in advanced lung cancer is important because bronchoscopic samples may sometimes be insufficient for this purpose. Further, the clinical applications of comprehensive molecular analysis such as whole genome sequencing (WGS) are rapidly developing. Diff-Quik cytology smears from EBUS TBNA is an alternative source of DNA, but its feasibility for WGS has not been previously demonstrated.

METHODS

Diff-Quik smears were collected along with research cell pellets.

RESULTS

Tumour content of smears were compared to research cell pellets from 42 patients, which showed good correlation (Spearman correlation 0.85, P < 0.0001). A subset of eight smears underwent WGS, which presented similar mutation profiles to WGS of the matched cell pellet. DNA yield was predicted using a regression equation of the smears cytology features, which correctly predicted DNA yield > 1500 ng in 7 out of 8 smears.

CONCLUSIONS

WGS of commonly collected Diff-Quik slides is feasible and their DNA yield can be predicted.

Evaluating Diff-Quik cytology smears for large-panel mutation testing in lung cancer-Predicting DNA content and success with low-malignant-cellularity samples

BACKGROUND

Cytology smears are commonly collected during endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS TBNA) procedures but are rarely used for molecular testing. Studies are needed to demonstrate their great potential, in particular for the prediction of malignant cell DNA content and for utility in molecular diagnostics using large gene panels.

METHODS

A prospective study was performed on samples from 66 patients with malignant lymph nodes who underwent EBUS TBNA. All patients had air-dried, Diff-Quik cytology smears and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded cell blocks collected for cytopathology and molecular testing. One hundred eighty-five smears were evaluated by microscopy to estimate malignant cell percentage and abundance and to calculate smear size and were subjected to DNA extraction. DNA from 56 smears from 27 patients was sequenced with the TruSight Oncology 500 assay (Illumina).

RESULTS

Each microscopy parameter had a significant effect on the DNA yield. An algorithm was developed that predicted a >50-ng DNA yield of a smear with an area under the curve of 0.86. Fifty DNA samples (89%) with varying malignant yields were successfully sequenced. Low-malignant-cell content (<25%) and smear area (<15%) were the main reasons for failure. All standard-of-care mutations were detected in replicate smears from individual patients, regardless of malignant cell content. Tier 1/2 mutations were discovered in two cases where standard-of-care specimens were inadequate for sequencing. Smears were scored for tumor mutation burden.

CONCLUSIONS

Microscopy of Diff-Quik smears can triage samples for comprehensive panel sequencing, which highlights smears as an excellent alternative to traditional testing with cell blocks.

Prospective Optimization of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration Lymph Node Assessment for Lung Cancer: Three Needle Agitations Are Noninferior to 10 Agitations for Adequate Tumor Cell and DNA Yield

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Comparison of actionable events detected in cancer genomes by whole-genome sequencing, in silico whole-exome and mutation panels

Background

Next-generation sequencing is used in cancer research to identify somatic and germline mutations, which can predict sensitivity or resistance to therapies, and may be a useful tool to reveal drug repurposing opportunities between tumour types. Multigene panels are used in clinical practice for detecting targetable mutations. However, the value of clinical whole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) for cancer care is less defined, specifically as the majority of variants found using these technologies are of uncertain significance.

Patients and methods

We used the Cancer Genome Interpreter and WGS in 726 tumours spanning 10 cancer types to identify drug repurposing opportunities. We compare the ability of WGS to detect actionable variants, tumour mutation burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability (MSI) by using in silico down-sampled data to mimic WES, a comprehensive sequencing panel and a hotspot mutation panel.

Results

We reveal drug repurposing opportunities as numerous biomarkers are shared across many solid tumour types. Comprehensive panels identify the majority of approved actionable mutations, with WGS detecting more candidate actionable mutations for biomarkers currently in clinical trials. Moreover, estimated values for TMB and MSI vary when calculated from WGS, WES and panel data, and are dependent on whether all mutations or only non-synonymous mutations were used. Our results suggest that TMB and MSI thresholds should not only be tumour-dependent, but also be sequencing platform-dependent.

Conclusions

There is a large opportunity to repurpose cancer drugs, and these data suggest that comprehensive sequencing is an invaluable source of information to guide clinical decisions by facilitating precision medicine and may provide a wealth of information for future studies. Furthermore, the sequencing and analysis approach used to estimate TMB may have clinical implications if a hard threshold is used to indicate which patients may respond to immunotherapy.

•

Genome analysis revealed that treatment biomarkers are shared across solid tumours, highlighting repurposing opportunities.

•

Comprehensive panels detect most known biomarkers; however, WGS detects more biomarkers for treatments in clinical trials.

•

TMB is well correlated between sequencing methods, but absolute values vary and are dependent on mutation types considered.

Characterizing immune cell subsets of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in brain metastases

Aims

The heterogeneity of TILs are not well characterized in brain metastasis. To address this, we performed a targeted analysis of immune cell subsets in brain metastasis tissues.

Method

We performed multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) on a limited cohort of brain metastases arising from breast cancers (n=20). Using RNA-interference validated antibodies, we quantitated the subsets of immune cells in formalin-fixed paraffin embedded whole sections. The panel of proteins analyzed included PanCK, CD8, CD4, Vista and Iba1 and an average of 15000 cells per sample were analysed. We also analysed an independent publicly available cohort at the RNA level to corroborate our findings.

Results

We found that increased density of tils (high&gt;30%; low &lt;30%) correlated with survival and they were two distinct phenotypes. The tumours with low tils had significantly higher expression of the immune-checkpoint molecule Vista in tumour cells (p&lt;0.01) as well as in their microenvironment (p&lt;0.001). Contrastingly, the brain metastatic tumours with high tils displayed higher expression of microglia. Low tils-tumours display CD8+ T-cells that exclusively co-express Vista (p&lt;0.01) compared to high tils group where CD8+ T-cells significantly co-express Iba1 (p&lt;0.05). Interestingly no definite phenotypes were observed in CD4+ T-cells. These results were also found in an independent cohort where Vista was a highly ranked gene within the CD8+ T-cell population.

Conclusion

Variety of immune escape routes may be involved in brain metastasis. This may be executed by increasing the expression of T-cell inhibitory molecule Vista or by increased activated microglia which may release immunosuppressive cytokines. Further studies are required to provide mechanistic insights into these phenomena.

Clinicopathologic significance of nuclear HER4 and phospho-YAP(S127) in human breast cancers and matching brain metastases

Background

Human epidermal growth factor receptor-4 (HER4) and yes-associated protein-1 (YAP) are candidate therapeutic targets in oncology. YAP's transcriptional coactivation function is modulated by the HER4 intracellular domain (HER4-ICD) in vitro, but the clinical relevance of this has not been established. This study investigated the potential for targeting the HER4-YAP pathway in brain metastatic breast cancer.

Methods

We performed immuno-phenotypic profiling of pathway markers in a consecutive breast cancer series with 25 years of clinical follow up (n = 371), and patient-matched breast and metastatic brain tumours (n = 91; 30 pairs).

Results

Membrane localisation of phospho-HER4 [pHER4(Y¹¹⁶²)] was infrequent in primary breast cancer, but very frequent in brain metastases (5.9% versus 75% positive), where it was usually co-expressed with pHER3(Y¹²⁸⁹) (p < 0.05). The presence of YAP in tumour cell nuclei was associated directly with nuclear pERK5(T²¹⁸/Y²¹⁰) (p = 0.003). However, relationships with disease-specific survival depended on oestrogen receptor (ER) status. Nuclear pYAP(S¹²⁷) was associated with smaller, good prognostic ER+ breast tumours (log-rank hazard-ratio 0.53; p = 9.6E^-03), but larger, poor prognostic triple-negative cancers (log-rank hazard-ratio 2.78; p = 1.7E^-02), particularly when co-expressed with nuclear HER4-ICD (p = 0.02). This phenotype was associated with stemness and mitotic instability markers (vimentin, SOX9, ID1, SPAG5, TTK, geminin; p < 0.05). YAP expression in brain metastases was higher than matched primary tumours; specifically, nuclear pYAP(S¹²⁷) in ER-negative cases (p < 0.05). Nuclear YAP was detected in ~70% of ER-negative, HER4-activated brain metastases.

Discussion

Our findings suggest that the canonical-mechanism where Hippo pathway-mediated phosphorylation of YAP ostensibly excludes it from the nucleus is dysfunctional in breast cancer. The data are consistent with pYAP(S¹²⁷) having independent transcriptional functions, which may include transducing neuregulin signals in brain metastases. Consistent with mechanistic studies implicating it as an ER co-factor, nuclear pYAP(S¹²⁷) associations with breast cancer clinical outcomes were dependent on ER status.

Conclusion

Preclinical studies investigating HER4 and nuclear YAP combination therapy strategies are warranted.