Management of patients with hereditary angioedema in Germany: comparison with other countries in the Icatibant Outcome Survey

Background

The Icatibant Outcome Survey (IOS; NCT01034969) is a Shire‐sponsored, international, observational study monitoring the safety and effectiveness of icatibant, a bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist approved for the acute treatment of adults with hereditary angioedema with C1 inhibitor deficiency (HAE‐C1‐INH).

Objective

To report IOS data comparing demographic and icatibant treatment outcomes in patients with HAE‐C1‐INH from Germany to HAE‐C1‐INH patients from 11 other IOS countries.

Methods

A descriptive, retrospective, comparative analysis of data from 685 IOS patients with HAE‐C1‐INH from seven centres in Germany (n = 93) vs. centres from Austria, Brazil, Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Greece, Israel, Italy, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom (n = 592, July 2009–January 2017). Icatibant treatment outcomes were retrieved from patients with complete attack outcome data for time to treatment, time to resolution and attack duration (160 attacks in 42 German patients and 1442 attacks in 251 patients from other IOS countries).

Results

German patients reported significantly fewer severe/very severe attacks (38.7% vs. 57.5%, respectively; P < 0.001). The proportion of attacks treated with a single icatibant injection was significantly higher in German patients (97.1% vs. 91.6%, P = 0.0003). The median time to treatment (0.0 h vs. 1.5 h), time to resolution (3.0 h vs. 7.0 h) and attack duration (4.3 h vs. 10.5 h) in German patients vs. other IOS countries were all significantly shorter (all P < 0.0001). No meaningful differences were identified between patients from Germany and other countries with regard to sex, median age at enrolment, median age at symptom onset and median age at diagnosis.

Conclusion

German IOS patients share similar demographic characteristics to patients from other IOS countries yet treat their attacks with icatibant significantly earlier and have markedly fewer severe or very severe attacks. Factors including regional access to and availability of icatibant may drive these outcomes and warrant further investigation.

The international WAO/EAACI guideline for the management of hereditary angioedema-The 2017 revision and update

Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) is a rare and disabling disease. Early diagnosis and appropriate therapy are essential. This update and revision of the global guideline for HAE provides up-to-date consensus recommendations for the management of HAE. In the development of this update and revision of the guideline, an international expert panel reviewed the existing evidence and developed 20 recommendations that were discussed, finalized and consented during the guideline consensus conference in June 2016 in Vienna. The final version of this update and revision of the guideline incorporates the contributions of a board of expert reviewers and the endorsing societies. The goal of this guideline update and revision is to provide clinicians and their patients with guidance that will assist them in making rational decisions in the management of HAE with deficient C1-inhibitor (type 1) and HAE with dysfunctional C1-inhibitor (type 2). The key clinical questions covered by these recommendations are: (1) How should HAE-1/2 be defined and classified?, (2) How should HAE-1/2 be diagnosed?, (3) Should HAE-1/2 patients receive prophylactic and/or on-demand treatment and what treatment options should be used?, (4) Should HAE-1/2 management be different for special HAE-1/2 patient groups such as pregnant/lactating women or children?, and (5) Should HAE-1/2 management incorporate self-administration of therapies and patient support measures?

International consensus on the diagnosis and management of pediatric patients with hereditary angioedema with C1 inhibitor deficiency

Background

The consensus documents published to date on hereditary angioedema with C1 inhibitor deficiency (C1‐INH‐HAE) have focused on adult patients. Many of the previous recommendations have not been adapted to pediatric patients. We intended to produce consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and management of pediatric patients with C1‐INH‐HAE.

Methods

During an expert panel meeting that took place during the 9th C1 Inhibitor Deficiency Workshop in Budapest, 2015 (www.haenet.hu), pediatric data were presented and discussed and a consensus was developed by voting.

Results

The symptoms of C1‐INH‐HAE often present in childhood. Differential diagnosis can be difficult as abdominal pain is common in pediatric C1‐INH‐HAE, but also commonly occurs in the general pediatric population. The early onset of symptoms may predict a more severe subsequent course of the disease. Before the age of 1 year, C1‐INH levels may be lower than in adults; therefore, it is advisable to confirm the diagnosis after the age of one year. All neonates/infants with an affected C1‐INH‐HAE family member should be screened for C1‐INH deficiency. Pediatric patients should always carry a C1‐INH‐HAE information card and medicine for emergency use. The regulatory approval status of the drugs for prophylaxis and for acute treatment is different in each country. Plasma‐derived C1‐INH, recombinant C1‐INH, and ecallantide are the only agents licensed for the acute treatment of pediatric patients. Clinical trials are underway with additional drugs. It is recommended to follow up patients in an HAE comprehensive care center.

Conclusions

The pediatric‐focused international consensus for the diagnosis and management of C1‐INH‐HAE patients was created.

Review of recent guidelines and consensus statements on hereditary angioedema therapy with focus on self-administration

Consensus meetings and the resulting recommendations shape treatment choices in rare diseases such as hereditary angioedema (HAE) because they combine the experience of prescribing physicians and the patients who are receiving therapy. Self-administration of HAE therapy was recognised as a potential treatment option in the first consensus publication in 2003. Recent studies have confirmed that self-administration of therapy resolves attacks quickly, safely and minimises burden of disease; however, the discovery of inconsistent treatment approaches is a concern and warrants investigation into the barriers that prevent adherence with current recommendations.

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) in children and adolescents--a consensus on therapeutic strategies

Hereditary angioedema due to C1 inhibitor (C1 esterase inhibitor) deficiency (types I and II HAE-C1-INH) is a rare disease that usually presents during childhood or adolescence with intermittent episodes of potentially life-threatening angioedema. Diagnosis as early as possible is important to avoid ineffective therapies and to properly treat swelling attacks. At a consensus meeting in June 2011, pediatricians and dermatologists from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland reviewed the currently available literature, including published international consensus recommendations for HAE therapy across all age groups. Published recommendations cannot be unconditionally adopted for pediatric patients in German-speaking countries given the current approval status of HAE drugs. This article provides an overview and discusses drugs available for HAE therapy, their approval status, and study results obtained in adult and pediatric patients. Recommendations for developing appropriate treatment strategies in the management of HAE in pediatric patients in German-speaking countries are provided.Conclusion Currently, plasma-derived C1 inhibitor concentrate is considered the best available option for the treatment of acute HAE-C1-INH attacks in pediatric patients in German-speaking countries, as well as for short-term and long-term prophylaxis.

Mutational spectrum of the C1INH (SERPING1) gene in patients with hereditary angioedema

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is an autosomal dominant disease that manifests as intermittent acute swellings of the skin and mucosal surfaces, which, in the gastrointestinal tract and larynx, may even be fatal. HAE results from functional deficiency of the C1 inhibitor (C1INH) protein, which plays a key role in the classical pathway of complement activation. C1INH is the sole inhibitor of the activated proteases C1r and C1s, and is the major regulator of activated coagulation Factor XII and plasma kallikrein, which limits the generation of the vasoactive peptide bradykinin. In this paper, we report on the genetic analysis of 173 families (including 326 members) with a clinical diagnosis of HAE. Direct sequencing, Southern blotting and quantitative PCR by the MLPA method were used to screen for mutations in C1INH (SERPING1). In 142 families (82.1%), a causative C1INH gene mutation could be identified. A total of 80 novel point mutations of C1INH not published previously were detected in 96 pedigrees (including 172 members). Our results corroborate C1INH (SERPING1) deficiency as a disease of extreme allelic heterogeneity with almost each individual family carrying their own mutation. Routine molecular genetic analysis is an effective way of confirming the clinical diagnosis and identifying mutation carriers early on before any clinical manifestation becomes apparent. It is, therefore, a valuable tool in prevention and adequate treatment of acute and life-threatening oedema.

Factor VIII inhibitors in patients with hemophilia A: epidemiology of inhibitor development and induction of immune tolerance for factor VIII

Factor (F) VIII inhibitor development remains one of the most serious complications in the treatment of hemophilia A. Former and recent studies on inhibitor development revealed that patients with severe hemophilia A and positive inhibitor family history are at highest risk of developing an inhibitor. Comparison of recent inhibitor incidence studies on previously untreated patients indicate that the risk of inhibitor development under treatment with recombinant FVIII concentrates is comparable to the inhibitor incidence under FVIII substitution by plasma-derived concentrates. However, longer observation periods are necessary to draw final conclusions. Since inhibitor development may result in inefficacy of FVIII concentrates in the treatment of severe bleedings, the induction of immune tolerance (IT) is still of main concern. Various regimens to induce IT by application of FVIII concentrates have been conducted up to now. Success rate appears to be influenced by low to high responder status, number of exposure days before onset of treatment, and dosage of therapeutic regimen. Especially, discontinuation of IT therapy seems to be associated with failure of therapy. Taking into account available data on IT therapy, we recommend early onset of a high dosage regimen in high responder patients as soon as possible after inhibitor detection, as this is associated with higher success rate and shorter elimination time.