1
|
Citrome L, Yagoda S, Bidollari I, Wang M. Safety and Tolerability of Starting Aripiprazole Lauroxil With Aripiprazole Lauroxil NanoCrystal Dispersion in 1 Day Followed by Aripiprazole Lauroxil Every 2 Months Using Paliperidone Palmitate Monthly as an Active Control in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Psychiatry 2024; 85:23m15095. [PMID: 38416865 DOI: 10.4088/jcp.23m15095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Abstract
Background: Aripiprazole lauroxil (AL) 1064 mg every 2 months following initiation using the AL NanoCrystal Dispersion formulation (ALNCD) plus 30-mg oral aripiprazole was efficacious and well tolerated in a 25-week, randomized, double-blind phase 3 trial in adults with acute schizophrenia. This post hoc analysis further characterized the safety of AL 1064 mg administered every 2 months and that of active control paliperidone palmitate (PP) 156 mg monthly based on occurrence, timing, and severity of adverse events (AEs) associated with antipsychotic medications. Methods: This study was conducted between November 2017 and March 2019. AL or PP was initiated during an inpatient stay of ≥ 2 weeks with transition to outpatient treatment thereafter. Rates of AEs of clinical interest, including injection site reactions (ISRs), motor AEs, sedation, hypotension, prolactin level increase, weight gain, and suicidal ideation/behavior, were summarized through weeks 4, 9, and 25 for each treatment. Results: Of 200 patients who received ≥ 1 dose of study treatment, 99 (49.5%) completed the study (AL, 57%; PP, 43%). Mean (SD) baseline Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total scores were 94.1 (9.04) and 94.6 (8.41) in the AL and PP treatment groups, respectively. AEs were reported by 69/99 (70%) patients administered AL and 72/101 (71%) administered PP; most AEs were mild or moderate in severity. ISRs (AL, 18.2%; PP, 26.7%) occurred primarily on days 1 and 8. All akathisia/restlessness AEs (AL, 10.1%; PP, 11.9%) occurred during the first 4 weeks; <10% of patients (either treatment) experienced hypotension, sedation, or suicidal ideation/behavior events. Weight gain of ≥ 7% from baseline occurred in 9.3% of AL- and 23.8% of PP-treated patients. Median prolactin concentrations changed by -4.60 and -3.55 ng/mL among AL-treated males and females, respectively, and did not exceed 2 times normal levels in any AL-treated patients. In PP-treated patients, changes were 21.20 and 80.40 ng/mL and concentrations exceeded 2 times normal in 38% and 88% of males and females, respectively. Conclusions: No new early- or late-emerging safety concerns were observed through 25 weeks of treatment with AL 1064 mg every 2 months following initiation using ALNCD plus 30-mg oral aripiprazole. Results were consistent with known safety profiles of AL and PP and support the safety of AL 1064 mg every 2 months initiated using ALNCD plus 30-mg oral aripiprazole. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03345979.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leslie Citrome
- New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York
- Corresponding Author: Leslie Citrome, MD, MPH, New York Medical College, 40 Sunshine Cottage Rd, Valhalla, NY 10595
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gotlib J, Castells M, Elberink HO, Siebenhaar F, Hartmann K, Broesby-Olsen S, George TI, Panse J, Alvarez-Twose I, Radia DH, Tashi T, Bulai Livideanu C, Sabato V, Heaney M, Van Daele P, Cerquozzi S, Dybedal I, Reiter A, Pongdee T, Barete S, Ustun C, Schwartz L, Ward BR, Schafhausen P, Vadas P, Bose P, DeAngelo DJ, Rein L, Vachhani P, Triggiani M, Bonadonna P, Rafferty M, Butt NM, Oh ST, Wortmann F, Ungerstedt J, Guilarte M, Taparia M, Kuykendall AT, Arana Yi C, Ogbogu P, Gaudy-Marqueste C, Mattsson M, Shomali W, Giannetti MP, Bidollari I, Lin HM, Sulllivan E, Mar B, Scherber R, Roche M, Akin C, Maurer M. Avapritinib versus Placebo in Indolent Systemic Mastocytosis. NEJM Evid 2023; 2:EVIDoa2200339. [PMID: 38320129 DOI: 10.1056/evidoa2200339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
Avapritinib in Indolent Systemic MastocytosisIn a randomized trial, patients with indolent systemic mastocytosis were treated with avapritinib or placebo along with supportive care. The trial primary end point was the change in mean total symptom scores at 24 weeks. Avapritinib-treated patients had a decrease in mean total symptom score of 15.6 points compared with 9.2 points in the placebo group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Gotlib
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Mariana Castells
- Department of Medicine, Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Hanneke Oude Elberink
- Department of Allergology, University Medical Center, Groningen Research Institute Asthma and COPD, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Frank Siebenhaar
- Institute of Allergology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin
- Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology, Allergology and Immunology, Berlin
| | - Karin Hartmann
- Division of Allergy, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Biomedicine, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Sigurd Broesby-Olsen
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Tracy I George
- Associated Regional and University Pathologists, Inc. Laboratories, Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City
| | - Jens Panse
- Department of Oncology, Hematology, Hemostaseology, and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Hospital Aachen, Medical Faculty, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology, Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, Düsseldorf (ABCD), Aachen, Germany
| | - Iván Alvarez-Twose
- Institute of Mastocytosis Studies of Castilla-La Mancha, Virgen del Valle Hospital, Toledo, Spain
| | - Deepti H Radia
- Guy's & St. Thomas' National Health Service Foundation Trust, London
| | - Tsewang Tashi
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Cristina Bulai Livideanu
- Department of Dermatology, Centre of Reference for Mastocytosis, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Vito Sabato
- Department of Immunology, Allergology and Rheumatology, University of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Mark Heaney
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York
| | - Paul Van Daele
- Department of Internal Medicine and Immunology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sonia Cerquozzi
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Ingunn Dybedal
- Department of Hematology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo
| | - Andreas Reiter
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Thanai Pongdee
- Division of Allergic Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Stéphane Barete
- Unit of Dermatology, Centre of Reference for Mastocytosis, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Paris
| | - Celalettin Ustun
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Oncology and Cell Therapy, Section of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Rush Medical College, Chicago
| | | | | | - Philippe Schafhausen
- Department of Oncology, Hematology, and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Peter Vadas
- Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto
| | - Prithviraj Bose
- Department of Leukemia, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | | | - Lindsay Rein
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Pankit Vachhani
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Massimo Triggiani
- Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Patrizia Bonadonna
- Allergy Unit and Asthma Center, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Mark Rafferty
- The Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, Scotland
| | - Nauman M Butt
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Bebington, Wirral, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen T Oh
- Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis
| | - Friederike Wortmann
- Oberärztin Hämatologie/Onkologie bei Uksh Campus Lübeck, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
| | - Johanna Ungerstedt
- Department of Medicine, Huddinge (H7), Karolinska University Hospitale, Stockholm
| | - Mar Guilarte
- Hospital UniversitariVall d'Hebron, Institut de Recerca Vall d'Hebron (VHIR), Barcelona
| | | | | | - Cecilia Arana Yi
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Princess Ogbogu
- Division of Pediatric Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, University Hospitals Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland
| | - Caroline Gaudy-Marqueste
- Service de Dermatologie et de cancérologie cutanée, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Marseille, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - Mattias Mattsson
- Department of Hematology, Uppsala University Hospital and Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - William Shomali
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Matthew P Giannetti
- Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston
| | | | - Hui-Min Lin
- Blueprint Medicines Corporation, Cambridge, MA
| | | | - Brenton Mar
- Blueprint Medicines Corporation, Cambridge, MA
| | | | - Maria Roche
- Blueprint Medicines Corporation, Cambridge, MA
| | - Cem Akin
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Marcus Maurer
- Institute of Allergology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin
- Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology, Allergology and Immunology, Berlin
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kelly DL, Claxton A, Bidollari I, Du Y. Analysis of prolactin and sexual side effects in patients with schizophrenia who switched from paliperidone palmitate to aripiprazole lauroxil. Psychiatry Res 2021; 302:114030. [PMID: 34118485 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
One strategy to address hyperprolactinemia and associated sexual side effects in patients receiving antipsychotics is switching to an antipsychotic not associated with prolactin elevation (eg, aripiprazole). This post hoc analysis assessed prolactin concentrations and sexual side effects in an open-label prospective study of switching long-acting injectable antipsychotics from paliperidone palmitate (PP) to aripiprazole lauroxil (AL). Serum prolactin was measured throughout the study. Patient-reported sexual and endocrine side effects were assessed on the UKU Side Effect Rating Scale sexual function subscale and analyzed in study completers. Prior to starting AL treatment (screening), 49/50 (98%) patients had prolactin concentrations above the upper limit of normal (ULN; >13.13 ng/mL [males]; >26.72 ng/mL [females]). Six months after beginning AL treatment, prolactin levels were above ULN in 2/32 (6.3%) patients. Among 32 study completers, 81.3% reported sexual dysfunction in ≥1 domain at screening versus 56.3% at 6 months after starting AL treatment. Diminished sexual desire was the most common patient-reported sexual complaint at screening (46.9%); at 6 months, it was reported by 18.8%. In this post hoc analysis, the high levels of prolactin observed at screening decreased during AL treatment, and modest improvements in sexual side effects were evident in patients with schizophrenia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deanna L Kelly
- Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Boni V, Winer IS, Gilbert L, Vaishampayan UN, Rosen SD, Muzaffar J, Spreafico A, McDermott DF, Chu QS, Dumas O, Chauhan A, Chaudhry A, Tomczak, MD P, Bruno DS, Du Y, Bidollari I, Rege JM, Ernstoff MS, Strauss JF, Velcheti V. ARTISTRY-1: Nemvaleukin alfa monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.2513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
2513 Background: Nemvaleukin alfa (nemvaleukin, ALKS 4230) is a novel, engineered cytokine that selectively binds the intermediate-affinity interleukin-2 (IL-2) receptor complex to preferentially activate CD8+ T cells and natural killer cells with minimal expansion of regulatory T cells, designed to leverage antitumor effects of the IL-2 pathwaywhile mitigating potential toxicity that would limit use. Methods: ARTISTRY-1 (NCT02799095) is a phase 1/2 study. Parts A (dose escalation 0.1-10 µg/kg) and B (6 µg/kg [recommended phase 2 dose]) are monotherapy; pts receive intravenous nemvaleukin for 5 days every 14 or 21 days. In Part C, pts receive nemvaleukin (3 or 6 µg/kg) every 21 days in combination with pembrolizumab (200 mg on day 1). We present safety and antitumor activity (RECIST v1.1, iRECIST) data as of 12/02/2020. Results: In Part A, 39 pts received nemvaleukin. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed; maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Part B enrolled immune checkpoint inhibitor–pretreated pts into melanoma or renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cohorts. 18 pts with melanoma enrolled; 10 were evaluable, 2 (both with metastatic mucosal melanoma) achieved a partial response (PR; 1 unconfirmed). 24 pts with RCC enrolled; 1 of 16 evaluable pts achieved a PR (awaiting confirmation). 12 pts in each cohort continue on study. In Parts A and B, treatment-related adverse events in ≥40% included chills (74.4% and 52.4%, respectively) and pyrexia (74.4% and 47.6%, respectively). In Part C (83 evaluable pts), 12 objective responses (OR) were observed; an additional 5 pts had stable disease (SD) >6 months (1 pt with breast cancer, 2 with ovarian cancer, and 2 with non-small-cell lung cancer). Nemvaleukin did not demonstrate any additive toxicity to that already established with pembrolizumab alone. OR data are summarized in the table. Conclusions: Nemvaleukin was generally well tolerated and demonstrated antitumor activity as monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab. Pharmacodynamic studies to identify biomarkers are ongoing. Future research of monotherapy and combination therapy with nemvaleukin is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT02799095. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Lucy Gilbert
- McGill University Health Centre, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Anna Spreafico
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - David F. McDermott
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Quincy S. Chu
- Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Olivier Dumas
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire De Quebec, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Aman Chauhan
- University of Kentucky, Division of Medical Oncology, Lexington, KY
| | | | - Piotr Tomczak, MD
- Clinical Hospital No. 1 of the Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vaishampayan U, Muzaffar J, Velcheti V, Winer I, Hoimes C, Rosen S, Spreafico A, McDermott D, Chu QC, Dumas O, Gilbert L, Hirte H, Curtis K, Du Y, Bidollari I, Sun L, Putiri E, Losey H, Dezube B, Ernstoff M. 1027MO ALKS 4230 monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab (pembro) in patients (pts) with refractory solid tumours (ARTISTRY-1). Ann Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.1147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
6
|
Weiden PJ, Claxton A, Kunovac J, Walling DP, Du Y, Yao B, Yagoda S, Bidollari I, Keane E, Cash E. Efficacy and Safety of a 2-Month Formulation of Aripiprazole Lauroxil With 1-Day Initiation in Patients Hospitalized for Acute Schizophrenia Transitioned to Outpatient Care: Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Control ALPINE Study. J Clin Psychiatry 2020; 81. [PMID: 32433835 DOI: 10.4088/jcp.19m13207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2019] [Accepted: 04/03/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Evaluate efficacy and safety of a 2-month formulation of aripiprazole lauroxil (AL) with 1-day initiation during hospitalization for acute exacerbation of schizophrenia followed by transition to outpatient care. METHODS The phase 3b double-blind Aripiprazole Lauroxil and Paliperidone palmitate: INitiation Effectiveness (ALPINE) study was conducted from November 2017 to March 2019. Adults with acute schizophrenia according to DSM-5 criteria were randomized (1:1) to AL (AL NanoCrystal Dispersion + oral aripiprazole 30 mg, day 1; AL 1,064 mg, day 8 and every 8 weeks [q8wk]) or paliperidone palmitate (PP 234 mg, day 1; PP 156 mg, day 8 and then q4wk) for 25 weeks. Patients remained hospitalized ≥ 2 weeks after randomization per protocol. Primary endpoint was within-group change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score (PANSST) from baseline to week 4. Secondary analyses included within- and between-group changes from baseline at various time points. Adverse events (AEs) and laboratory data were monitored. RESULTS A total of 200 patients were randomized (AL, n = 99; PP, n = 101); 56.6% and 42.6%, respectively, completed the study. For AL, the mean baseline PANSST was 94.1; scores were significantly reduced from baseline at week 4 (-17.4; P < .001) and were also reduced at weeks 9 (-19.8) and 25 (-23.3). With PP, PANSST also improved significantly from baseline (94.6) at week 4 (-20.1; P < .001) and also improved at weeks 9 (-22.5) and 25 (-21.7). The 3 most common AEs over 25 weeks in the AL group were injection site pain (17.2%), increased weight (9.1%), and akathisia (9.1%). The same AEs were the most common in the PP group (injection site pain [24.8%], increased weight [16.8%], and akathisia [10.9%]). CONCLUSIONS AL and PP were efficacious and well-tolerated for initiating treatment of schizophrenia in the hospital and continuing outpatient treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03345979.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J Weiden
- Karuna Therapeutics, 33 Arch Street, Suite 3110, Boston, MA 02110. .,Alkermes, Inc, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Baiyun Yao
- Alkermes, Inc, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | | | - Ethan Cash
- Alkermes, Inc, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Naismith RT, Wundes A, Ziemssen T, Jasinska E, Freedman MS, Lembo AJ, Selmaj K, Bidollari I, Chen H, Hanna J, Leigh-Pemberton R, Lopez-Bresnahan M, Lyons J, Miller C, Rezendes D, Wolinsky JS. Diroximel Fumarate Demonstrates an Improved Gastrointestinal Tolerability Profile Compared with Dimethyl Fumarate in Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: Results from the Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III EVOLVE-MS-2 Study. CNS Drugs 2020; 34:185-196. [PMID: 31953790 PMCID: PMC7018784 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-020-00700-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diroximel fumarate (DRF) is a novel oral fumarate approved in the USA for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis. DRF is converted to monomethyl fumarate, the pharmacologically active metabolite of dimethyl fumarate (DMF). DRF 462 mg and DMF 240 mg produce bioequivalent exposure of monomethyl fumarate and are therefore expected to have similar efficacy/safety profiles; the distinct chemical structure of DRF may contribute to its tolerability profile. OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to compare the gastrointestinal tolerability of DRF and DMF over 5 weeks in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. METHODS EVOLVE-MS-2 was a phase III, randomized, double-blind, head-to-head, 5-week study evaluating the gastrointestinal tolerability of DRF 462 mg vs DMF 240 mg, administered twice daily in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, using two self-administered gastrointestinal symptom scales: Individual Gastrointestinal Symptom and Impact Scale (IGISIS) and Global Gastrointestinal Symptom and Impact Scale (GGISIS). The primary endpoint was the number of days with an IGISIS intensity score ≥ 2 relative to exposure. Other endpoints included the degree of gastrointestinal symptom severity measured by IGISIS/GGISIS and assessment of safety/tolerability. RESULTS DRF-treated patients experienced a statistically significant reduction (46%) in the number of days with an IGISIS symptom intensity score ≥ 2 compared with DMF-treated patients (rate ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.54 [0.39-0.75]; p = 0.0003). Lower rates of gastrointestinal adverse events (including diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain) were observed with DRF than DMF (34.8% vs 49.0%). Fewer patients discontinued DRF than DMF because of adverse events (1.6% vs 5.6%) and gastrointestinal adverse events (0.8% vs 4.8%). CONCLUSIONS DRF demonstrated an improved gastrointestinal tolerability profile compared with DMF, with less severe gastrointestinal events and fewer days of self-assessed gastrointestinal symptoms, fewer gastrointestinal adverse events, and lower discontinuation rates because of gastrointestinal adverse events. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03093324).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Annette Wundes
- Department of Neurology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Tjalf Ziemssen
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, Dresden, Germany
| | - Elzbieta Jasinska
- Collegium Medicum UJK, and Clinical Center, RESMEDICA, Kielce, Poland
| | - Mark S Freedman
- University of Ottawa and the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Anthony J Lembo
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Krzysztof Selmaj
- Center of Neurology, Lodz, Poland
- Department of Neurology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland
| | | | - Hailu Chen
- Biogen, 225 Binney St, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jerry S Wolinsky
- Department of Neurology, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Naismith RT, Wolinsky JS, Wundes A, LaGanke C, Arnold DL, Obradovic D, Freedman MS, Gudesblatt M, Ziemssen T, Kandinov B, Bidollari I, Lopez-Bresnahan M, Nangia N, Rezendes D, Yang L, Chen H, Liu S, Hanna J, Miller C, Leigh-Pemberton R. Diroximel fumarate (DRF) in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: Interim safety and efficacy results from the phase 3 EVOLVE-MS-1 study. Mult Scler 2019; 26:1729-1739. [PMID: 31680631 PMCID: PMC7604551 DOI: 10.1177/1352458519881761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diroximel fumarate (DRF) is a novel oral fumarate for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). DRF and the approved drug dimethyl fumarate yield bioequivalent exposure to the active metabolite monomethyl fumarate; thus, efficacy/safety profiles are expected to be similar. However, DRF's distinct chemical structure may result in a differentiated gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability profile. OBJECTIVE To report interim safety/efficacy findings from patients in the ongoing EVOLVE-MS-1 study. METHODS EVOLVE-MS-1 is an ongoing, open-label, 96-week, phase 3 study assessing DRF safety, tolerability, and efficacy in RRMS patients. Primary endpoint is safety and tolerability; efficacy endpoints are exploratory. RESULTS As of March 2018, 696 patients were enrolled; median exposure was 59.9 (range: 0.1-98.9) weeks. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 84.6% (589/696) of patients; the majority were mild (31.2%; 217/696) or moderate (46.8%; 326/696) in severity. Overall treatment discontinuation was 14.9%; 6.3% due to AEs and <1% due to GI AEs. At Week 48, mean number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions was significantly reduced from baseline (77%; p < 0.0001) and adjusted annualized relapse rate was low (0.16; 95% confidence interval: 0.13-0.20). CONCLUSION Interim data from EVOLVE-MS-1 suggest DRF is a well-tolerated treatment with a favorable safety/efficacy profile for patients with RRMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jerry S Wolinsky
- Department of Neurology, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Houston, TX, USA
| | - Annette Wundes
- Department of Neurology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Douglas L Arnold
- Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada/NeuroRx Research Inc., Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Mark S Freedman
- University of Ottawa and the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Tjalf Ziemssen
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, Dresden, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gavrielov-Yusim N, Bidollari I, Kaplan S, Bartov N. Challenges of post-authorization safety studies: Lessons learned and results of a French study of fentanyl buccal tablet. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2017; 27:457-463. [PMID: 29027301 DOI: 10.1002/pds.4331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2017] [Revised: 09/07/2017] [Accepted: 09/13/2017] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Recruiting and retaining participants in real-world studies that collect primary data are challenging. This article illustrates these challenges using a post-authorization safety study (PASS) to assess adverse events (AEs) experienced with fentanyl buccal tablet (FBT) over 3 months of treatment. METHODS This was an observational, prospective, multicenter study in France conducted over 1 year. The study employed primary data collection in FBT-treated patients and their treating physicians via a site qualification questionnaire and patient log completed by physicians and a questionnaire and pain diary completed by patients. Strategies to increase participation included reminders, newsletters, frequent follow-up telephone calls, and reducing the extent of data collected. RESULTS Of the 1118 physicians contacted who returned the participation form or responded to a telephone call, only 128 expressed willingness to participate. Key reasons for non-participation were lack of interest (69.7%) and FBT not being used in practice by the contacted physician (25.1%). Overall, 224 patients were screened by 31 physicians, and 97 were enrolled. Key reasons for patient non-inclusion were unwillingness or inability to complete the patient AE diary or questionnaire (40.9% [52/127]) and patients' decision (33.9% [43/127]). CONCLUSIONS Despite efforts to increase participation, enrollment in this study was low. Recruitment and retention methods are limited in their capacity to optimally execute a primary data collection in a PASS. For a PASS to provide reliable and valid information on medication use, involvement from health care agencies, regulators, and pharmaceutical companies is needed to establish their importance, drive study participation, and reduce patient withdrawal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sigal Kaplan
- Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Petach-Tikva, Israel
| | - Netta Bartov
- Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Petach-Tikva, Israel
| |
Collapse
|