Global-PPS targets for antimicrobial stewardship in paediatric patients at hospitals in Sanandaj, Western Iran, compared with Southeast Asian and European hospitals

OBJECTIVES

Point prevalence surveys (PPS) provide valuable data on patterns of hospital antimicrobial administration. To identify quality improvement indicators, we evaluated antimicrobial prescribing patterns in children and neonates admitted to three referral centres in Sanandaj, Western Iran, and compared these with Southeast Asian and European paediatric benchmark data.

METHODS

The standardised Global-PPS was performed to assess antimicrobial use in Southeast Asia, including Sanandaj and European hospitals, in 2019.

RESULTS

Of the 4118, 2915, and 443 paediatric patients enrolled in Southeast Asian, European and Sanandaj hospitals, 2342 (56.9%), 833 (28.6%) and 332 (74.9%), respectively, received at least one antimicrobial in 2019. The most administered antibiotics in neonates were ampicillin in Southeast Asia (30.3%) and Sanandaj (41.5%, often in combination with cefotaxime (29.0%)), compared with amoxicillin in Europe (20.0%). In children, ceftriaxone was most prescribed in Sanandaj (62.4%) and Southeast Asia (20.5%) as opposed to amoxicillin (11.8%) in Europe. Twice as many Watch antibiotics (83.0%) were prescribed on paediatric wards in Sanandaj compared with European paediatric wards (41.1%). All antimicrobials in Sanandaj hospitals were prescribed empirically, and prolonged surgical prophylaxis was common (75.5%).

CONCLUSION

The high prevalence of antibiotic prescribing, high empirical therapies, and poor outcomes for antibiotic quality indicators strongly suggest the urgent need for an antibiotic stewardship program in Sanandaj hospitals, where improved diagnostic laboratory capacity and reconsideration of training may be good targets for intervention in their hospitals.

AWaRe classification of antibiotics prescribed within 2018-2021 for hospitalised medical and surgical patients in Uyo, Nigeria

Introduction

point prevalence surveys have been used as a standardized tool to monitor antibiotic consumption to inform antimicrobial stewardship interventions in many countries. The 2021 WHO model list of Essential Medicines has classified antibiotics into three groups: access, watch and reserve. The aim of this paper is to describe the antibiotics used within a space of three years between 2018 and 2021 at the University of Uyo Teaching Hospital based on WHO AWaRe classification.

Methods

three point-prevalence surveys were conducted in the wards in our 500-bed tertiary hospital in 2018, 2019 and 2021. Each ward was surveyed on a particular day within a four-week period. The wards were grouped into medical and surgical for comparison. Antibiotics were classified as access, watch, and reserve. Validated data were analyzed with IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.).

Results

a total of 526 patients were surveyed out of which 344 were on antimicrobial therapy with a total of 687 antibiotic prescriptions. The overall prevalence of patients who received at least one antimicrobial was 65.4% (62.4 -72.8%). The Access group of antibiotics made up 48.2% of prescriptions while the watch group made up 50.5% of prescriptions. More watch Antibiotics were prescribed by surgical wards (49.7%) than by medical wards (43.7%).

Conclusion

the use of Access group antibiotics in our hospital falls below the WHO target level in both medical and surgical wards. There is a need for strengthening antibiotic stewardship activities to reduce the use of watch group antibiotics and limit antimicrobial resistance.

Comparing Patterns in Antimicrobial Use During Global Point Prevalence Study at a Single Tertiary Hospital in Ghana: Implications for Antimicrobial Stewardship Programme

Background

The Global Point Prevalence Study (PPS) provides a platform for institutions to register and add clinical information on antimicrobial usage and determine variables related to proper antimicrobial stewardship.

Objective

To assess the trends in antimicrobial usage and quality indicators in antimicrobial prescriptions at our hospital.

Method

We retrospectively compared data collected at Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital (KATH) during the Global PPS in 2015 and 2019. Both surveys took place on a day in September of the respective year. Medical records of all in-patients on admission at 0800 hours on a specific day were reviewed for antimicrobial use in the survey. Data on antibiotic use, including indications for use and the presence of quality indicators, were recorded.

Results

The total number of patients on admission in 2015 and 2019 were 386 and 630, respectively. The proportion of patients on at least one antimicrobial was 64% (247/386) and 58.4% (368/630) in 2015 and 2019, respectively. Pneumonia was the most common medical condition for which antimicrobial was prescribed for 2015, 30(16.9%) and 2019, 44(23.0%), respectively. There was a decrease in Hospital-acquired infections from 2015, 6.2% (24/386) to 4.8% (30/630) in 2019. The use of biomarkers increased from 4.9% (12/247) to 7.6% (28/368).

Conclusion

Over 50% of hospitalised patients were on antimicrobials for both years. The inauguration of the antimicrobial stewardship committee at KATH will improve these quality indicators.

Antimicrobial Prescribing Patterns in Patients with COVID-19 in Russian Multi-Field Hospitals in 2021: Results of the Global-PPS Project

The COVID-19 pandemic is a global public health challenge with understudied effects on antimicrobial usage. We aimed to analyze antimicrobial prescribing patterns in COVID-19 patients in Russian multi-field hospitals by means of the Global-PPS Project developed by the University of Antwerp. Out of 999 patients in COVID-19 wards in six hospitals surveyed in 2021, 51.3% received antimicrobials (79% in intensive care, 47.5% in medical wards). Systemic antivirals and antibiotics were prescribed to 31% and 35.1% of patients, respectively, and a combination of both to 14.1% of patients. The top antivirals administered were favipiravir (65%), remdesivir (19.2%), and umifenovir (15.8%); the top antibiotics were ceftriaxone (29.7%), levofloxacin (18%), and cefoperazone/sulbactam (10.4%). The vast majority of antibiotics was prescribed for treatment of pneumonia or COVID-19 infection (59.3% and 25.1%, respectively). Treatment was based on biomarker data in 42.7% of patients but was targeted only in 29.6% (6.7% for antibiotics). The rate of non-compliance with guidelines reached 16.6%. Antimicrobial prescribing patterns varied considerably in COVID-19 wards in Russian hospitals with groundlessly high rates of systemic antibiotics. Antimicrobial usage surveillance and stewardship should be applied to inpatient care during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The 2018 Global Point Prevalence Survey of antimicrobial consumption and resistance in 47 Canadian hospitals: a cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND

Patient-level surveillance of antimicrobial use (AMU) in Canadian hospitals empowers the reduction of inappropriate AMU and was piloted in 2017 among 14 hospitals in Canada. We aimed to describe AMU on the basis of patient-level data in Canadian hospitals in 2018 in terms of antimicrobial prescribing prevalence and proportions, antimicrobial indications, and agent selection in medical, surgical and intensive care wards.

METHODS

Canadian adult, pediatric and neonatal hospitals were invited to participate in the standardized web-based cross-sectional Global Point Prevalence Survey of Antimicrobial Consumption and Resistance (Global-PPS) conducted in 2018. An identified site administrator assigned all wards admitting inpatients to specific surveyors. A physician, pharmacist or nurse with infectious disease training performed the survey. The primary outcomes were point prevalence rates for AMU over the study period regarding prescriptions, indications and agent selection in medical, surgical and intensive care wards. The secondary outcomes were AMU for resistant organisms and practice appropriateness evaluated on the basis of quality indicators. Antimicrobial consumption is presented in terms of prevalence and proportions.

RESULTS

Forty-seven of 118 (39.8%) hospitals participated in the survey; 9 hospitals were primary care centres, 15 were secondary care centres and 23 were tertiary or specialized care centres. Of 13 272 patients included, 33.5% (n = 4447) received a total of 6525 antimicrobials. Overall, 74.1% (4832/6525) of antimicrobials were for therapeutic use, 12.6% (n = 825) were for medical prophylaxis, 8.9% (n = 578) were for surgical prophylaxis, 2.2% (n = 143) were for other use and 2.3% (n = 147) were for unidentified reasons. A diagnosis or indication was documented in the patient's file at the initiation for 87.3% (n = 5699) of antimicrobials; 62.9% (n = 4106) of antimicrobials had a stop or review date; and 72.0% (n = 4697) of prescriptions were guided by local guidelines.

INTERPRETATION

Overall, three-quarters of AMU was for therapeutic use across participating hospitals. Canadian hospitals should be further incentivized to create and adapt local guidelines on the basis of recent antimicrobial resistance data.

Assessing the impact of the Global Point Prevalence Survey of Antimicrobial Consumption and Resistance (Global-PPS) on hospital antimicrobial stewardship programmes: results of a worldwide survey

BACKGROUND

The Global Point Prevalence Survey of Antimicrobial Consumption and Resistance (Global-PPS) provides a methodology to support hospitals worldwide in collecting antimicrobial use data. We aim to evaluate the impact of the Global-PPS on local antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes and assess health care professionals' educational needs and barriers for implementing AMS.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was disseminated within the Global-PPS network. The target audience consisted of hospital healthcare workers, involved in local surveillance of antimicrobial consumption and resistance. This included contacts from hospitals that already participated in the Global-PPS or were planning to do so. The survey contained 24 questions that addressed the hospital's AMS activities, experiences conducting the PPS, as well as the learning needs and barriers for implementing AMS.

RESULTS

A total of 248 hospitals from 74 countries participated in the survey, of which 192 had already conducted the PPS at least once. The survey response rate was estimated at 25%. In 96.9% of these 192 hospitals, Global-PPS participation had led to the identification of problems related to antimicrobial prescribing. In 69.3% at least one of the hospital's AMS components was initiated as a result of Global-PPS findings. The level of AMS implementation varied across regions. Up to 43.1% of all hospitals had a formal antimicrobial stewardship strategy, ranging from 10.8% in Africa to 60.9% in Northern America. Learning needs of hospitals in high-income countries and in low-and middle-income countries were largely similar and included general topics (e.g. 'optimising antibiotic treatment'), but also PPS-related topics (e.g. 'translating PPS results into meaningful interventions'). The main barriers to implementing AMS programmes were a lack of time (52.7%), knowledge on good prescribing practices (42.0%), and dedicated funding (39.9%). Hospitals in LMIC more often reported unavailability of prescribing guidelines, insufficient laboratory capacity and suboptimal use of the available laboratory services.

CONCLUSIONS

Although we observed substantial variation in the level of AMS implementation across regions, the Global-PPS has been very useful in informing stewardship activities in many participating hospitals. More is still to be gained in guiding hospitals to integrate the PPS throughout AMS activities, building on existing structures and processes.

Antibiotic Prescribing Patterns in Ghana, Uganda, Zambia and Tanzania Hospitals: Results from the Global Point Prevalence Survey (G-PPS) on Antimicrobial Use and Stewardship Interventions Implemented

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) remains an important global public health issue with antimicrobial misuse and overuse being one of the main drivers. The Global Point Prevalence Survey (G-PPS) of Antimicrobial Consumption and Resistance assesses the prevalence and the quality of antimicrobial prescriptions across hospitals globally. G-PPS was carried out at 17 hospitals across Ghana, Uganda, Zambia and Tanzania. The overall prevalence of antimicrobial use was 50% (30–57%), with most antibiotics prescribed belonging to the WHO ‘Access’ and ‘Watch’ categories. No ‘Reserve’ category of antibiotics was prescribed across the study sites while antimicrobials belonging to the ‘Not Recommended’ group were prescribed infrequently. Antimicrobials were most often prescribed for prophylaxis for obstetric or gynaecological surgery, making up between 12 and 18% of total prescriptions across all countries. The most prescribed therapeutic subgroup of antimicrobials was ‘Antibacterials for systemic use’. As a result of the programme, PPS data are now readily available for the first time in the hospitals, strengthening the global commitment to improved antimicrobial surveillance. Antimicrobial stewardship interventions developed included the formation of AMS committees, the provision of training and the preparation of new AMS guidelines. Other common interventions included the presentation of findings to clinicians for increased awareness, and the promotion of a multi-disciplinary approach to successful AMS programmes. Repeat PPS would be necessary to continually monitor the impact of interventions implemented. Broader participation is also encouraged to strengthen the evidence base.

Hospital antibiotic prescribing patterns in adult patients according to the WHO Access, Watch and Reserve classification (AWaRe): results from a worldwide point prevalence survey in 69 countries

Objectives

The WHO Access, Watch and Reserve (AWaRe) classification has been developed to support countries and hospitals in promoting rational use of antibiotics while improving access to these essential medicines. We aimed to describe patterns of worldwide antibiotic use according to the AWaRe classification in the adult inpatient population.

Methods

The Global Point Prevalence Survey on Antimicrobial Consumption and Resistance (Global-PPS) collects hospital antibiotic use data using a standardized PPS methodology. Global-PPS 2015, 2017 and 2018 data, collected by 664 hospitals in 69 countries, were categorized into AWaRe groups to calculate proportional AWaRe use, Access-to-Watch ratios and the most common indications for treatment with selected Watch antibiotics. Only prescriptions for systemic antibiotics on adult inpatient wards were analysed.

Results

Regional Access use ranged from 28.4% in West and Central Asia to 57.7% in Oceania, whereas Watch use was lowest in Oceania (41.3%) and highest in West and Central Asia (66.1%). Reserve use ranged from 0.03% in sub-Saharan Africa to 4.7% in Latin America. There were large differences in AWaRe prescribing at country level. Watch antibiotics were prescribed for a range of very different indications worldwide, both for therapeutic and prophylactic use.

Conclusions

We observed considerable variations in AWaRe prescribing and high use of Watch antibiotics, particularly in lower- and upper-middle-income countries, followed by high-income countries. The WHO AWaRe classification has an instrumental role to play in local and national stewardship activities to assess prescribing patterns and to inform and evaluate stewardship activities.

Implementation of a multidisciplinary antimicrobial stewardship programme in a Philippine tertiary care hospital: an evaluation by repeated point prevalence surveys

OBJECTIVES

Optimising antimicrobial prescribing in hospitals through antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) is essential in addressing the global threat of antimicrobial resistance. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of a hospital-wide programme, delivered by a multidisciplinary AMS team, on antimicrobial prescribing outcomes.

METHODS

The AMS programme consisted of a combination of persuasive, restrictive, and structural components and was implemented in two phases. We used data from the Global-PPS, collected every six months between September 2017 and December 2019, to measure the antimicrobial use prevalence and monitor selected antibiotic prescribing quality indicators.

RESULTS

A significantly increasing trend (P < 0.001) was observed for the indicators related to documentation of prescribing, that is the reason for treatment and stop or review date. We observed a significantly decreasing trend (P < 0.001) in the number of prescriptions for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) prescribed for more than 24 h; however, sample sizes for surgical patients were small. For these three indicators, a sudden and pronounced improvement was seen after the second set of interventions, which consisted of (i) an antibiotic documentation policy, (ii) a 24-h automatic stop order for SAP, and (iii) dissemination of new SAP guidelines. A significantly decreasing trend was also observed for hospital-wide antimicrobial use prevalence (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of a multidisciplinary antimicrobial stewardship programme positively influenced antibiotic prescribing practices. Further research should address long-term trends in antibiotic prescribing to establish whether these coordinated activities have led to a sustained behaviour change among prescribers, thereby also evaluating clinical outcomes and antimicrobial resistance rates.

Antibiotic use among surgical inpatients at a tertiary health facility: a case for a standardized protocol for presumptive antimicrobial therapy in the developing world

Background

Indiscriminate antimicrobial use is one of the greatest contributors to antimicrobial resistance. A low level of asepsis in hospitals and inadequate laboratory support have been adduced as reasons for indiscriminate use of antimicrobials among surgical patients. At present, there are no guidelines for presumptive antibiotic use in Nigeria and sub-Saharan Africa.

Aim

Surgical inpatients at the study hospital were surveyed to determine the level of antimicrobial use and degree of compliance with prescription quality indicators.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey was conducted among all surgical inpatients in May 2019 using a standardized tool developed by the University of Antwerp to assess the point prevalence of antimicrobials. Inpatients who were admitted from 08:00 h on the day of the survey were included. Data on patients' demographics, indication for antimicrobial use, reason for antimicrobial use, stop/review date, adherence to guidelines and laboratory use were collected. The prevalence of antimicrobial use in the surgical department was estimated.

Results

Eighty-two inpatients were included in the survey. Of these, 97.6% were receiving at least one antimicrobial agent. Only 5.4% of the prescriptions were targeted, and 37.6% of prescriptions were for empirical treatment of infections. Approximately half (50.7%) of the patients were receiving presumptive antibiotics, and 6% were receiving prophylactic antibiotics. In total, 58.7% of prescriptions were administered parenterally, and 98.2% of patients had documentation of a stop/review date. Metronidazole (P=32.3%, T=29.2%), ceftriaxone (P=28.4%, T=19.8%) and ciprofloxacin (P=14.2%, T=14.6%) were the most common antimicrobials used.

Conclusions

There is a high rate of antimicrobial use among surgical inpatients, and the rate of indiscriminate antimicrobial prescribing among these patients needs to be reduced. This can be achieved by developing antimicrobial guidelines for presumptive antimicrobial therapy.

2018. The Global Point Prevalence Survey of Antimicrobial Consumption and Resistance: Quantity and Quality of Antimicrobial Prescribing for Inpatients with Pneumonia in the Philippines in 2018

Background

Pneumonia is the most common indication for prescription of antibiotics in hospitals in the Philippines. We describe the quality and quantity of antibiotic prescribing for hospitalized pneumonia patients in the Philippines in 2018 (www.global-PPS.com).

Methods

A point prevalence survey was performed from September to December 2018 in 28 public and private hospitals in Luzon, Mindanao, and Visayas regions. Ward- and patient-level data were collected using a standardized methodology and entered through a web-based application. We analyzed all antibiotic (ATC J01) prescriptions for inpatients with pneumonia.

Results

Of all hospitalized patients, 16.2% (n = 1516) received one or more antibiotic (J01) for treatment of pneumonia, majority (78.3%) of which were for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). In adults, the most commonly used antibiotics were azithromycin (19.5%), ceftriaxone (19.0%), and piperacillin/enzyme inhibitor (13.2%) for CAP and meropenem (19.8%), piperacillin/enzyme inhibitor (18.9%), and levofloxacin (8.6%) for healthcare-associated pneumonia (HAP). In neonates and children, cefuroxime was used most often (20.1%) for treatment of CAP, followed by ampicillin (16.7%) and amikacin (15.3%). Children and neonates with HAP were most commonly treated with amikacin (18.7%), meropenem (15.7%), and ampicillin (10.4%). Overall, 16.0% of all antibiotic prescriptions for pneumonia were based on microbiological results, 11.3% for CAP and 33.9% for HAP. Microbiology-based prescriptions were most commonly targeted at ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae (8.4%). Further analysis of quality indicators showed that up to 80.0% of all prescriptions for pneumonia were compliant to local guidelines and reason in notes was documented for 81.0% of prescriptions. However, the stop or review date of antibiotic treatment for pneumonia was less documented (27.8%).

Conclusion

Global-PPS data provided valuable insights into the quantity and quality of antibiotic prescribing for pneumonia inpatients. These results will be fedback to the Department of Health, medical societies, and hospitals for prioritization of targets and policies toward the improvement of the Philippine antimicrobial stewardship program.

Disclosures

All authors: No reported disclosures.

1135. The 2018 Global Point Prevalence Survey of Antimicrobial Consumption and Resistance: Pediatric Results from 26 Canadian Hospitals

Background

Inappropriate antimicrobial use (AMU) is strongly associated with antimicrobial resistance. The Global Point Prevalence Survey (Global-PPS) is a standardized tool that is used worldwide to characterize inpatient AMU. We report pediatric results from 26 Canadian hospitals that participated in the Global-PPS in 2018.

Methods

The survey was completed by each site on the Global-PPS website for all patients aged 0–17 years hospitalized in a neonatal or pediatric ward on a chosen day between January and December 2018. Data collected included ward type, demographics, antimicrobials prescribed, diagnosis, type of indication (community-acquired [CA] vs. healthcare-associated [HA]) and type of therapy (empiric vs. targeted). Quality indicators included guideline compliance, medical record documentation of diagnosis, antimicrobial stop/review date, and surgical prophylaxis (SP) duration.

Results

Of the 26 sites, 23 were mixed and 3 were pediatric hospitals, with data on 767 inpatients. Overall, 25.8% (n = 198) of patients received at least one antimicrobial, and 21.9% (n = 168) were on at least one antibiotic. The highest AMU was found in Hematology-Oncology (84%), Pediatric Intensive Care (55.3%) and surgical (42.1%) units. Of the 330 antimicrobial prescriptions, 40.9% were for CA infections, 23% for medical prophylaxis, 20% for HA infections and 2.7% for SP. The most commonly treated infections were sepsis (16%) and lower respiratory tract infection (12.1%). The top five prescribed antibiotics were aminopenicillins (20.4%), aminoglycosides (16.1%), third-generation cephalosporins (15.4%), piperacillin–tazobactam (7.5%) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (7.5%). Diagnosis and stop/review date were documented for 88.1% and 65.1% of prescriptions, respectively. Compliance to local guidelines was found in 91.5% of therapies. SP exceeded 24 hours in 88.9% of courses.

Conclusion

The Global-PPS generated Canada-wide data on inpatient pediatric AMU, which will allow hospitals to benchmark and develop local quality improvement interventions to enhance appropriate AMU. Targets for improvement include suboptimal antimicrobial stop/review date documentation and prolonged SP.

Disclosures

All authors: No reported disclosures.

Abstract PD7-04: Exome based germline mutation detection in a panel of 372 cancer associated genes in BRCA1/2-negative familial breast cancer patients

Background:

Ten to 20% percent of all breast cancers occur in a familial context and in 20-30% of these cases a mutation in the BRCA1 or BRCA2, CHEK2 genes or, more rarely, in PALB2 can be found. The remaining cases remain routinely undiagnosed with regard to a possible genetic cause.

We have examined a cohort of undiagnosed probands using exome germline sequencing in order to identify other potential breast cancer predisposition genes.

Methods:

In total, 63 BRCA1/2-negative high risk familial BC cases (BRCAX) were considered for pair-end whole exome germline DNA sequencing on a HiSeq1500 (Illumina). High quality reads were mapped (BWA-MEM) to the reference genome (hg19) and variants were called according to GATK best practice guideline. The variants detected within the panel of 372 cancer associated genes were annoted with ANNOVAR. Synonymous variant as well as variants with MAF&gt;1% were discarded. In a first phase protein truncating variants were validated using another NGS method. Subsequent validation of non-synonymous missense mutations and non-frameshift indels is planned. Patients signed a multilayered informed consent also covering disclosure or not of different types of incidental findings.

Results:

For each exome, the mean breath of coverage was about 96 % at 10X or more and the mean depth of coverage for targeted region was about 126X. In total, 3570709 SNPs (∼56678 SNPs/sample) and 477801 INDELs (7584 INDELs/sample) were called. Of them, 20829 SNPs (331 SNPs/sample) and 16071 INDELs (255 INDELs/sample) passed quality filter. In total, 445 variants were found in the publicly available cancer genes panel. Twenty-seven stop-gain/loss, frame-shift insertion/deletion and splice site variants were considered for validation with 454 Roch Junior, among which 22 variants in genes ABCC11, AFP, BARD1, BBS10, CD96, CYP1A1, DNAH11, ESCO2, EXO1, FANCI, FLCN, FLT4, HPS6, MYH8, NME8, PALB2, PDE11A, RECQL4, TTC8 were validated as true positive. Some of these genes have been found earlier to be associated with breast cancer and/other cancer types. Functional prioritization of the remaining 416 non-synonymous and non-frameshift insertion/deletions was also done in-silico before further sequencing validation, which is ongoing. The mutations found are further clinically validated by examining other affected and non-affected family members and mining the literature. Some of the mutations in known cancer predisposing genes are considered for prudent application in clinical counseling. Genotype-phenotype correlations are being examined.

Conclusion:

Next-generation sequencing enabled us to detect variants with high/low penetrance in known cancer predisposing genes in &gt; 35% of BRAX families, in addition to many novel variants in many other genes not yet tied to cancer predisposition occurring singly or in combination with known cancer gene mutations. Validated variants are further examined in the families for co-segregation with the disease and potential application in counseling.

Citation Format: Shahi RB, Caljon B, De Brakeleer S, Decoster L, Fontaine C, Vanacker L, Vanhoeij M, Pauwels I, Bonduelle M, Vandooren S, Croes D, Teugels E, De Greve J. Exome based germline mutation detection in a panel of 372 cancer associated genes in BRCA1/2-negative familial breast cancer patients. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD7-04.

Frequent incidence of BARD1-truncating mutations in germline DNA from triple-negative breast cancer patients

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for 10-20% of all breast cancers (BCs), and conventional chemotherapy is the only effective systemic treatment. Germline BRCA1/2 mutations are found in approximately 15% of TNBC patients. In the past, we have documented pathogenic mutations in BARD1, a BRCA1 interacting protein, in families at high risk for BC. In this study, we have analyzed germline DNA from 61 estrogen receptor negative patients (of which 42 were TNBC) for the presence of mutations in the BRCA1, BRCA2 and BARD1 gene. BRCA1/2 mutations were found in 8 out of 42 (19%) TNBC patients, but not in the ER-/HER2+ cohort. We also found four good candidate pathogenic BARD1 mutations in the TNBC cohort, including two protein-truncating mutations (p.Gln564Ter and p.Arg641Ter). Our data suggest that TNBC patients are enriched for pathogenic BARD1 germline mutations as compared to control samples and high BC risk families. Ten of the 42 investigated TNBC patients carry a BRCA pathway mutation (in BRCA1, BRCA2 or BARD1) rendering them susceptible to homologous recombination deficiency. These patients should become eligible for exploring the efficacy of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors.

Relationship between the thyroidal and gonadal axes during the estrous cycle of ewes of different breeds and ages

In order to define the patterns of TSH, T4, T3, rT3, GH and cortisol during the estrous cycle of sheep, pluriparous and primiparous ewes were synchronized with progestagen-impregnated pessaries (Veramix) at the start of the normal breeding season. After the pessaries were removed (day 0), daily blood sampling was carried out in cannulated ewes during the ovulatory cycle. Hormonal analyses of TSH, T4, T3, rT3, GH, cortisol, LH and progesterone (P) were performed by RIA. P and LH levels during the cycle were conform to the literature and were not different between the primiparous and pluriparous ewes of different breeds used in this study. Neither age nor breed influenced the hormone patterns. A significant negative correlation was found between TSH and P during the cycle, although the correlation between P and T4 was not significant; during the estrous period, low P levels were paralleled by high T4 levels, whereas the reverse was observed during the luteal phase. Higher T3 levels and T3/T4 ratios were observed during the luteal phase. No obvious pattern of rT3 and cortisol during the cycle was found. The GH concentration increased during the 17 days of the cycle. A positive correlation with P was calculated. During the estrous cycle obvious changes in thyroid hormones, GH and TSH occurred. However, this study shows no causal relationship between the thyroid and the gonadal axes.