Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)
To evaluate rectal dose sparing in prostate cancer patients with hydrogel spacer who underwent an external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with different fractionation schemes.
MATERIALS/METHODS
In a previous study, we have reported that rectal sparing was achieved in prostate cancer patients with hydrogel spacer who underwent a combination therapy of EBRT and LDR brachytherapy (Zhang H, et al. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 2022). In this study, we focused on evaluation of spacer-related rectal sparing in patients who underwent an EBRT with conventional fractionation (81 Gy in 45 fractions), hypofractionation (70 Gy in 28 fractions), or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for 40 Gy or 42.5 Gy in 5 fractions. In 172 patients, 119 patients were applied with injection of polyethylene-glycol hydrogel and others without the injection as control. In VMAT plans, doses to rectal wall were examined and converted to BED according to AAPM TG-137 (α/β ratio = 4 Gy).
RESULTS
On average, an interspace of 1cm between prostate and rectum was achieved by spacer insertion. Rectal wall was defined as 0.4cm thickness inside the outer contour of rectum, and the volume ranged from 4.5 cm3 to 21.3cm3 for patients with spacer and from 8.2cm3 to 35.1cm3 for those with no spacer. In conventional scheme, an average rectal BED was 120.0 Gy, 116.9 Gy, 114.0 Gy, 108.6 Gy, 87.6 Gy and 55.6 Gy to the volume of 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 5 and 10cm3, respectively, and BEDmean was 55.3 Gy in patients with no spacer. The BED decreased to 105.1 Gy, 96.3 Gy, 86.1 Gy, 75.4 Gy, 51.7 Gy and 26.9 Gy to the volume of 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 5 and 10cm3, respectively (p < 0.01), and BEDmean was 46.0 Gy in patients with spacer. In hypofractionation, rectal BED was in average of 115.8 Gy, 112.3 Gy, 109.8 Gy, 103 Gy, 81.6 and 52.8 Gy to the volume of 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 5 and 10cm3, respectively, and BEDmean was 48.6 Gy in patients with no spacer. Patients with spacer had significantly decreases of rectal BED, an average of 103 Gy, 91.7 Gy, 84.1 Gy, 72.8 Gy, 48.8 Gy and 26.0 Gy to the volume of 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 5 and 10cm3, respectively (p < 0.01), BEDmean was 42.4 Gy. In SBRT, average rectal BED in patients with spacer decreased to 93.6 Gy, 78.4 Gy, 69 Gy, 57.5 Gy, 38.5 Gy and 21.5 Gy, in comparison of 124.1 Gy, 117,4 Gy, 110.9 Gy, 97.3 Gy, 59.7 Gy and 32.3 Gy to the volume of 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 5 and 10cm3 in those without spacer, respectively (p <0.01). BEDmean decreased to 32.0 Gy in patient with spacer, compared with 43.2 Gy in those with no spacer.
CONCLUSION
Insertion of hydrogel spacer significantly improved rectal dose sparing, about 11.1% to 50.8% in conventional scheme, 12.4% to 51.6% in hypofractionation scheme, and 24.6% to 40.9% in SBRT patients. Furthermore, relatively more dose sparing on rectum was seen on the volume from 0.1cm3 to 2cm3 in SBRT patients.
Collapse