Axillary lymph node micrometastases decrease triple-negative early breast cancer survival

BACKGROUND

Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) are the most deadly form of breast cancer (BC) subtypes. Axillary lymph node involvement (ALNI) has been described to be prognostic in BC taken as a whole, but its prognostic value in each subtype is unclear. We explored the prognostic impact of ALNI and especially of small size axillary metastases in early TNBCs.

METHODS

We analysed in this multicentre study all patients treated for early TNBC in 12 French cancer centres. We explored the correlation between clinicopathological data and ALNI, with a specific focus on the dichotomisation between macrometastases and occult metastases, which is defined as the presence of isolated tumour cells or micrometastases. The prognostic value of ALNI both in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was also explored.

RESULTS

We included 1237 TNBC patients. Five-year DFS and OS were 83.7% and 88.5%, respectively. The identified independent prognostic features for DFS were tumour size >20 mm (hazard ratio (HR)=1.86; 95% CI: 1.11-3.10, P=0.018), lymphovascular invasion (HR=1.69; 95% CI: 1.21-2.34, P=0.002) and ALNI both in case of macrometastases (HR=1.97; 95% CI: 1.38-2.81, P<0.0001) and occult metastases (HR=1.72; 95% CI: 1.1-2.71, P=0.019). DFS and OS were similar between tumours with occult metastases and macrometastases. Tumours presenting at least two pejorative features (out of ALNI, lymphovascular invasion and large tumour size) displayed a significantly poorer DFS in both the training set and validation set, independently of chemotherapy administration. Tumours with no more than one of the above-cited pejorative features had a 5-year OS of ⩾90% vs 70% for other cases (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Axillary lymph node involvement is a key prognostic feature for early TNBC when isolated tumour cells were identified in lymph nodes. This impact is independent of chemotherapy use.

Impact of completion axillary lymph node dissection in patients with breast cancer and isolated tumour cells or micrometastases in sentinel nodes

BACKGROUND

Omission of completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is a standard practice in patients with breast cancer (BC) and negative sentinel nodes (SNs) but has shown insufficient evidence to be recommended in those with SN invasion.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients with BC and micrometastases (Mic) or isolated tumour cells (ITCs) in SN. Factors associated with ALND were identified, and patients with ALND were matched to patients without ALND. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were estimated in the overall population, in Mic and in ITC cohorts.

FINDINGS

Among 2009 patients analysed, 1390 and 619 had Mic and ITC in SN, respectively. Factors significantly associated with ALND were SN status, histological type, age, number of SN harvested and absence of adjuvant chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 60.4 months, ALND omission was independently associated with reduced OS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.41, 90 confidence interval [CI] 1.36-4.27, p = 0.0102), but not with increased RFS (HR 1.21, 90 CI 0.74-2.0, p = 0.52) in the overall population. In matched patients, the increased risk of death in case of ALND omission was found only in the Mic cohort (HR 2.88, 90 CI 1.46-5.69), not in the ITC cohort. The risk of recurrence was also significantly increased in the subgroup of matched Mic patients (HR 1.56, 90 CI 0.90-2.73).

INTERPRETATION

A separate analysis of Mic and ITC groups, matched for the determinants of ALND, suggested that patients with Mic had increased recurrence rates and shorter OS when ALND was not performed. Our results are consistent with those of previous studies for patients with ITC but not for those with Mic. Randomised controlled clinical trials are still warranted to show with a high level of evidence if ALND can be safely omitted in patients with micrometastatic disease in SN.

Characteristics and clinical outcome of T1 breast cancer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

A subgroup of T1N0M0 breast cancer (BC) carries a high potential of relapse, and thus may require adjuvant systemic therapy (AST).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of all patients with T1 BC, who underwent surgery from January 1999 to December 2009 at 13 French sites. AST was not standardized.

RESULTS

Among 8100 women operated, 5423 had T1 tumors (708 T1a, 2208 T1b and 2508 T1c 11-15 mm). T1a differed significantly from T1b tumors with respect to several parameters (lower age, more frequent negative hormonal status and positive HER2 status, less frequent lymphovascular invasion), exhibiting a mix of favorable and poor prognosis factors. Overall survival was not different between T1a, b or c tumors but recurrence-free survival was significantly higher in T1b than in T1a tumors (P = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, tumor grade, hormone therapy and lymphovascular invasion were independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

Relatively poor outcome of patients with T1a tumors might be explained by a high frequency of risk factors in this subgroup (frequent negative hormone receptors and HER2 overexpression) and by a less frequent administration of AST (endocrine treatment and chemotherapy). Tumor size might not be the main determinant of prognosis in T1 BC.

Electrochemotherapy: a new treatment of solid tumors

Electrochemotherapy is a new local treatment of the solid tumors that can be defined as the local potentiation, by means of permeabilizing electric pulses, of the antitumor activity of non-permeant (e.g. bleomycin) or low-permeant (e.g. cisplatin) anticancer drugs. The electric pulses are delivered locally on the solid tumors, after the intravenous or intralesional injection of the chemotherapy agent. In this review, the basis of the electrochemotherapy are recalled. Then, after summarizing clinical data, we present some results of the European project Cliniporator, as well as the new pulse generator, the Cliniporator, that incorporates new features resulting from this research project, and that is fully conceived for a clinical use. Finally, future perspectives are discussed.

["Standards, Options and Recommendations 2001" for radiotherapy in patients with non-metastatic infiltrating breast cancer. Update. National Federation of Cancer Campaign Centers (FNCLCC)]

CONTEXT

The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of french cancer centers (FNCLCC), the 20 french cancer centers, and specialists from french public universities, general hospitals and private clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and the outcome of cancer patients. The methodology is based on a literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery.

OBJECTIVES

To develop clinical practice guidelines for non metastatic breast cancer patients according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project.

METHODS

Data were identified by searching Medline, web sites, and using the personal reference lists of members of the expert groups. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to 148 independent reviewers.

RESULTS

This article presents the chapter radiotherapy resulting from the 2001 update of the version first published in 1996. The modified 2001 version of the standards, options and recommendations takes into account new information published. The main recommendations are: (1) Breast irradiation after conservative surgery significantly decrease the risk of local recurrence (level of evidence A) and the decrease in the risk of local recidive after chest wall irradiation is greater as the number of risk factors for local recurrence increases (level of evidence A). (2) After conservative surgery, a whole breast irradiation should be performed at a minimum dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions (standard, level of evidence A). (3) A boost in the tumour bed should be performed in women under 50 years, even if the surgical margins are free (standard, level of evidence B). (4) Internal mammary chain irradiation is indicated for internal or central tumours in the absence of axillary lymph node involvement (expert agreement) and in the presence of lymph node involvement (standard, level of evidence B1). (5) Sub- and supra-claviculr lymph node irradiation is indicated in patients with axillary node involvement (standard, level of evidence B1).

[Sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer. Will this lead to the end of lymphadenectomy for small tumors without suspected axillary adenopathy?]

Sentinel node (SN) biopsy in breast cancer is still in a crucial stage of evaluation. Many teams have obtained excellent results using this method, with a detection rate always higher than 90% and a false negative rate between 0 and 8%, in prospective series. The main question is to know if lymphadenectomy can now be avoided when the SN is negative. The answer will come from the results of the two ongoing trials comparing sentinel node biopsy to axillary lymphadenectomy. But their results will be available only in two or three years. However, many teams, as at Institute Gustave Roussy, are now applying the technique routinely, because of the excellent results obtained during their learning curve. But there are some methodological differences between teams, which can influence the detection and false negative rates. Thus, several methodological standards remain to be defined. This review enable us to clarify a certain number of questions. Today, SN biopsy can only be performed by trained teams, with prospective evaluation of their results or participation in phase III trials.

[Standards, Options and Recommendations (SOR) for endocrine therapy in patients with non metastatic breast cancer. FNCLCC]

CONTEXT

The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centres and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature systematic review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery.

OBJECTIVES

To develop clinical practice guidelines according to the definitions of Standards, Options and Recommendations for endocrine therapy in patients with non metastatic breast cancer.

METHODS

Data have been identified by literature search using Medline, Embase, Cancerlit and Cochrane databases - until july 1999 - and the personal reference lists of the expert group. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to 125 independent reviewers.

RESULTS

The main recommendations for the endocrine therapy of patients with non metastatic breast cancer are: 1) Endocrine therapy modalities depend on menopausal status or age of women: ovarian suppression for premenopausal women, antiestrogen drug therapy for postmenopausal women (standard). 2) Tamoxifen (20 mg/d - 5 years) is beneficial to women with positive estrogen receptor tumor (standard, level of evidence A). There is no indication of tamoxifen treatment for women with negative estrogen receptor tumor (standard, level of evidence A). 3) For postmenopausal women with positive estrogen receptor tumor, tamoxifen is the standard adjuvant treatment (level of evidence A). For postmenopausal women with negative estrogen receptor, adjuvant chemotherapy has to be considered (option, level of evidence A). No adjuvant treatment has to be considered for women with poor health condition (option). 4) For premenopausal women with estrogen receptor tumor, results of clinical trials of chemotherapy versus endocrine therapy, suggest a benefit for endocrine therapy. However, there is no sufficient evidence to consider endocrine therapy alone as a standard adjuvant treatment. 5) For premenopausal women, chemotherapy + ovarian suppression or chemotherapy + tamoxifen are not better than chemotherapy alone (level of evidence A). 6) For postmenopausal women, administration of chemotherapy plus adjuvant tamoxifen versus the same tamoxifen alone, is of additional benefit in reducing recurrences but not in prolonging overall survival (standard, level of evidence A). 7) Balance of known benefits (delay to recurrence and death) and risks (side-effects of therapy) for adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy has to be taken into consideration before decision making. Chemoendocrine therapy can be indicated for women at high risk of developing metastatic disease (recommendation, experts agreement).

[Standards, Options and Recommendations (SOR): clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of cutaneous melanoma. Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer]

CONTEXT

The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centres and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature systematic review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery.

OBJECTIVES

To develop clinical practice guidelines according to the definitions of Standards, Options and Recommendations for the management of patients with cutaneous melanoma.

METHODS

Data have been identified by literature search using Medline - until December 1998 - and the personal reference lists of the expert group. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to national and international independent reviewers and to the medical committees of the 20 French Cancer Centres.

RESULTS

The main recommendations for the management of cutaneous melanoma (CM) are: 1) The primary prevention of melanoma is based on a reduction in exposure to ultraviolet rays (solar or artificial). 2) The diagnosis of CM requires the surgical removal and histological examination of the lesion (standard). 3) The pathological report must include the diagnosis of primary malignant melanoma, the maximum thickness of the tumour in millimeters (Breslow), the clearance of surgical margins, the level of invasion (Clark), the presence and extension of regression and the presence of any ulceration (standard). 4) The standard treatment of a primary melanoma without lymph node involvement is based on surgery that must ensure adequate margins depending on the thickness of the tumour (standard, level of evidence B). 5) After surgery of a stage I melanoma, there is no indication for additional treatment outside a prospective therapeutic study (standard, level of evidence B, French Consensus Conference). 6) For a local recurrence without node involvement, in the absence of other metastases, surgical excision is the standard treatment. 7) In the case of metastatic regional lymph nodes, a complete regional lymphadenectomy is required. There is no indication for additional treatment outside a prospective therapeutic study (standard, level of evidence B). The inclusion of these patients in controlled studies of immunotherapy is recommended. 8) There is no standard therapeutic strategy for metastatic melanoma. Conventional palliative treatment is chemotherapy with dacarbazine (level of evidence B). 9) Follow-up is based on physical examination (standard). Patient information must encourage self-surveillance. Clinical surveillance and self-detection are indicated in all cases throughout life (standard).

[Treatment of breast cancer after 70 years of age. Report of 1143 cases]

STUDY AIM

Breast cancer is the most frequent type of cancer in women, increasing in frequency with the elderly. In Europe, a third of new breast cancers occur in women over 70 years of age. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyse the tumoural lesions and therapeutic results in a female population over 70, treated in the same medical centre over a 15-year period.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1978 to 1992, 1,143 female patients aged 70 or over were treated for a unilateral breast cancer without metastases and followed-up during a mean 6-year period. The initial treatment was surgical in 1,012 patients: radical mastectomy in 95% of the cases with axillary node dissection in 97.6%. Adjuvant radiotherapy was performed in 289 patients and adjuvant treatment with Tamoxifen in 411 patients. The results were compared with those obtained in 2,947 patients aged 50 to 69, treated during the same period in the same medical centre.

RESULTS

The 5-year survival rate in women 70 and over was 80% vs 85.5% in women aged 50 to 69 (P < 0.000001). The same rate of loco-regional recurrences and metastases occurred in both populations. In the patients who initially underwent surgery, after multivariate analysis according to the Cox model, the prognosis factors (similar to those observed in the group of younger women) were: the number of involved nodes (P = 0.000001), the clinical size of the tumour (P = 0.00001), the histological grade (P = 0.01), and the estrogen receptors (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

In this series, the treatment was focused on surgery complemented with adjuvant radiotherapy according to node invasion and adjuvant hormonotherapy according mostly to hormonal receptors. However, the complete treatment could not be applied to all cases: only 50% of patients with node involvement were irradiated. The 5-year survival rate lower than that of younger patients may be attributed to incomplete adjuvant treatment. Specific controlled trials taking into account quality of life had to be undertaken in elderly patients in order to adjust the treatment in relation with the patients' age and physiological condition.

Contrast-enhanced CT: value for diagnosing local breast cancer recurrence after conservative treatment

PURPOSE

To assess contrast material-enhanced computed tomography (CT) of breast for diagnosing local recurrence after conservative therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 111 patients, 118 lesions were evaluated with unenhanced and enhanced CT. Criterion for cancer recurrence was detection of a lesion with an enhancement of 45 HU or more.

RESULTS

One group comprised 52 lesions with pathologic diagnoses, obtained within 1 month of CT, of malignancy in 43 and benignancy in nine. Scans were positive in 40 of 43 recurrences and negative in six of nine benign lesions. Seventeen recurrent lesions were nonpalpable, and contrast-enhanced CT results were true-positive in 15 of these. A second group comprised 66 lesions with a mean follow-up of the treated breast of 28 months after CT. In 56 lesions, the scans were negative, with no recurrence in 55; local recurrence was proved with a 14-month delayed surgical biopsy in one. In 10 lesions, scans were positive, with a delayed diagnosis of recurrence 5 and 6 months after CT in two and no evidence of recurrence in eight (false-positive results). The sensitivity of breast CT for both groups was 91% (42 of 46 lesions) with a specificity of 85% (61 of 72 lesions).

CONCLUSION

Contrast-enhanced CT is sensitive in the diagnosis of local recurrence of breast cancer, even in nonpalpable lesions, and may be a useful tool in patients with equivocal clinical and/or mammographic findings during follow-up after conservative therapy.

Multicentre study of surgical complications of colonoscopy

A total of 196 records of colonoscopic surgical complications were reviewed during a 12-year period. Perforation (183 patients) and haemorrhage (11) were the two main complications. Diagnosis of perforation was delayed in 58 per cent of patients. The sigmoid colon was the site of perforation in 72 per cent with evidence of peritoneal contamination in 59 per cent. Postoperative mortality rate of perforation was 12 per cent and was significantly related to a past history of medical disease and size of perforation. Postoperative morbidity rate was 43 per cent. There were two deaths after colostomy closure. The overall mortality rate of colonoscopic perforation requiring an emergency surgical procedure reached 14 per cent. Haemorrhage always occurred after endoscopic polypectomy; the postoperative course was uneventful in these patients.

[Clinical prognostic factors in breast cancer. Retrospective study of 5609 cases]

We studied the clinical factors of metastatic risk of breast cancer in 5609 consecutive cases of unilateral invasive breast cancer, wholly treated and followed at René-Huguenin Center from 1962 to 1988, and without any other cancer (even a controlateral breast cancer). All these patients were protocolary treated; these protocols, especially medical treatments (chimio and hormonotherapy), being modified along with years. At 20 years, the global metastasis free survival was 56%. Clinical size, existence of inflammatory signs, UICC clinical stage, clinical nodal status were highly significant in the Cox multivariate analysis (P < 0.000001). Age (P < 0.0008) and adherence to skin or underlying parietal (P < 0.007) were also but less significant. On the other hand, location of the tumor, time between first signs and diagnosis were not predictive. The women under 35 years had more metastatic locations during their evolution (P < 0.05) and maybe more visceral metastasis (NS).

[Cloacogenic cancers of the anal canal: a retrospective study of 17 cases]

This study involved 17 cloacogenic cancers classified on the Morson and Jass histological scale and on the TNM clinical classification as T1 (4), T2 (3), T3 (3) and T4 (7) and including 5 N+ cases at the time of diagnosis. Treatment combined radiotherapy and surgery and the overall actuarial survival was 45% after 5 years. These results confirm that the response to treatment of cloacogenic cancers is similar to that of epidermoid cancers, notably with regard to the response to radiotherapy, and that the prognosis depends above all on the initial extent of the cancer. In contrast, cancers showing little or no differentiation (small cell cloacogenic cancers) are distinguished from other duct cancers by their explosive metastatic potential.