Changing Knowledge and Attitudes towards Bariatric Surgery in Primary Care: a 10-Year Cross-Sectional Survey

BACKGROUND

Some 28% of the Scottish population suffer from obesity. Bariatric procedures per population carried out in England when compared to Scotland (NBSR 2018) are significantly higher. Primary care practitioners (PCP) influence equality of access to secondary care bariatrics and frequently manage post-operative bariatric patients. Examining changes in PCP knowledge and attitude could improve access to bariatric procedures in Scotland.

METHODS

Following a sample pilot, all PCPs within three Scottish NHS health boards were emailed a questionnaire-based survey (2011; n = 902). A subsequent 10-year follow-up encompassed a greater scope of practice, additionally distributed to all PCPs in five further health boards (2021; n = 2049).

RESULTS

Some 452 responses were achieved (2011, 230; 2021, 222). PCPs felt bariatric surgery offered a greater impact in both weight management and that of obesity-related diseases (p < .0001). More PCPs were aware of local bariatric surgical referral criteria (2011, 43%; 2021, 57% (p = .003)), and more made referrals (2011, 60%; 2021, 72% (p = .018)) but were less familiar with national bariatric surgical guidelines (2011, 70%; 2021, 48% (p < .001)). Comfort at managing post-operative bariatric surgical patients were unchanged (2011, 24%; 2021, 27% (p = .660)). Minimal progress through dietetic-lead weight management services, plus rejection of patients thought to be good candidates, was reasons for referral hesitancy.

CONCLUSION

Over 10 years, PCPs were more aware of local referral criteria, making increased numbers of referrals. Knowledge deficits of national guidelines remain, and overwhelmingly PCPs do not feel comfortable looking after post-operative bariatric surgical patients. Further research into PCP educational needs, in addition to improving the primary to secondary care interface, is required.

EP.FRI.464 Application of the Oakland score to a real world lower GI bleeding patient population

Aims

Lower GI bleeding (LGIB) is a significant burden on healthcare resources with an estimated 21120 UK annual admissions. The Oakland score was developed in 2017 and allows patients to be triaged based on clinical and laboratory parameters to predict safe discharge; an Oakland score &lt;8 predicts safe discharge with a 98.4% sensitivity. We aim to describe our experience at applying this scoring system to our practice. 

Methods

This retrospective single centre study included 25 consecutive emergency LGIB referrals to a busy district general hospital. Oakland score was retrospectively calculated from case notes and clinical outcomes followed up. 

Results

The average age of the patient group was 72.8 years, 56% were male. 64% of our patients were referred from ED with the remainder from GP. Mean Oakland score was 16.68. 40% of patients were on anti-platelets or a DOAC. The average length of stay was 2.56 days. 76% of these patients did not receive a blood transfusion and 73% did not undergo any imaging or endoscopy while an inpatient. Only 5 of the patients were sent home directly from the surgical assessment unit. 

Conclusions

Our preliminary real world experience suggests that routine use of the Oakland score will allow for safe rationalisation of inpatient services. Further prospective data collection is required to validate this approach. Our data represents only patients admitted to hospital, therefore the low-scoring patient population is not represented; these patients will be included in prospective analysis.

EP.TU.560Improving surgical handover by implementing a dynamic handover sheet

Aim

Safe and effective handover is paramount to ensuring good patient care and patient safety. The aim of this study was to identify key issues with the current handover sheets and implement a new comprehensive sheet aimed to improve quality of handover and reduce safety issues within a busy DGH general surgery department.

Methods

A prospective dynamic study was performed. Retrospective data was obtained by sending out questionnaires to all junior and senior staff. The questionnaire aimed to assess key issues with the original handover sheets and collect qualitative data of perceived safety and efficiency. A dynamic handover sheet was developed using Microsoft Excel and Microsoft Visual Basic. After 2 months of using the new handover sheet, repeat questionnaires were sent out to assess its impact.

Results

There were 26 responses to the pre-intervention and 14 to the post-intervention questionnaire. 14/26 (54%) reported safety issues, mainly patients being missed at weekend ward rounds or missing handovers from elective teams. Post introduction of the comprehensive sheet 6/14 (43%) reported safety issues, mostly related to user error. Subjective list accuracy improved from 59.0% to 65.3% and accuracy for weekend wardrounds improved from 58.4% to 61.3%. Subjective efficiency of the list improved from 52.5% to 71.5%.

Conclusion

The new, dynamic handover sheet has led to an overall improvement in safety and efficiency of handover. An easy to understand instruction sheet has been designed to further improve usability and to ensure a lasting effect to mitigate against the inherent risk of junior doctor change-over.

Removing hospital-based triage from suspected colorectal cancer pathways: the impact and learning from a primary care-led electronic straight-to-test pathway

BACKGROUND

The 2-week wait referral pathway for suspected colorectal cancer was introduced in England to improve time from referral from a general practitioner (GP) to diagnosis and treatment. Patients are required to be seen by a hospital clinician within 2 weeks if their symptoms meet the criteria set by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and to start cancer treatment within 62 days. To achieve this, many hospitals have introduced a straight-to-test (STT) strategy requiring hospital-based triage of referrals. We describe the impact and learning from a new pathway which has removed triage and moved the process of requesting tests from hospital to GPs in primary care.

METHOD

An electronic STT pathway was introduced allowing GPs to book tests supported by a decision aid based on NICE guidance eliminating the need for a standard referral form or triage process. The hospital identified referrals as being on a cancer pathway and dealt with all ongoing management. Routinely collected cancer data were used to identify time to cancer diagnosis compared with national data RESULTS: 11357 patients were referred via the new pathway over 3 years. Time from referral to diagnosis reduced from 39 to 21 days and led to a dramatic improvement in patients starting treatment within 62 days. Challenges included adapting to a change in referral criteria and developing a robust hospital system to monitor the pathway.

CONCLUSION

We have changed the way patients with suspected colorectal cancer are managed within the National Health Service by giving GPs the ability to order tests electronically within a monitored cancer pathway halving time from referral to diagnosis.

Prophylactic biological mesh reinforcement versus standard closure of stoma site (ROCSS): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Closure of an abdominal stoma, a common elective operation, is associated with frequent complications; one of the commonest and impactful is incisional hernia formation. We aimed to investigate whether biological mesh (collagen tissue matrix) can safely reduce the incidence of incisional hernias at the stoma closure site.

METHODS

In this randomised controlled trial (ROCSS) done in 37 hospitals across three European countries (35 UK, one Denmark, one Netherlands), patients aged 18 years or older undergoing elective ileostomy or colostomy closure were randomly assigned using a computer-based algorithm in a 1:1 ratio to either biological mesh reinforcement or closure with sutures alone (control). Training in the novel technique was standardised across hospitals. Patients and outcome assessors were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome measure was occurrence of clinically detectable hernia 2 years after randomisation (intention to treat). A sample size of 790 patients was required to identify a 40% reduction (25% to 15%), with 90% power (15% drop-out rate). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02238964.

FINDINGS

Between Nov 28, 2012, and Nov 11, 2015, of 1286 screened patients, 790 were randomly assigned. 394 (50%) patients were randomly assigned to mesh closure and 396 (50%) to standard closure. In the mesh group, 373 (95%) of 394 patients successfully received mesh and in the control group, three patients received mesh. The clinically detectable hernia rate, the primary outcome, at 2 years was 12% (39 of 323) in the mesh group and 20% (64 of 327) in the control group (adjusted relative risk [RR] 0·62, 95% CI 0·43-0·90; p=0·012). In 455 patients for whom 1 year postoperative CT scans were available, there was a lower radiologically defined hernia rate in mesh versus control groups (20 [9%] of 229 vs 47 [21%] of 226, adjusted RR 0·42, 95% CI 0·26-0·69; p<0·001). There was also a reduction in symptomatic hernia (16%, 52 of 329 vs 19%, 64 of 331; adjusted relative risk 0·83, 0·60-1·16; p=0·29) and surgical reintervention (12%, 42 of 344 vs 16%, 54 of 346: adjusted relative risk 0·78, 0·54-1·13; p=0·19) at 2 years, but this result did not reach statistical significance. No significant differences were seen in wound infection rate, seroma rate, quality of life, pain scores, or serious adverse events.

INTERPRETATION

Reinforcement of the abdominal wall with a biological mesh at the time of stoma closure reduced clinically detectable incisional hernia within 24 months of surgery and with an acceptable safety profile. The results of this study support the use of biological mesh in stoma closure site reinforcement to reduce the early formation of incisional hernias.

FUNDING

National Institute for Health Research Research for Patient Benefit and Allergan.

Association between preadmission frailty and care level at discharge in older adults undergoing emergency laparotomy

Background

Older adults undergoing emergency abdominal surgery have significantly poorer outcomes than younger adults. For those who survive, the level of care required on discharge from hospital is unknown and such information could guide decision-making. The ELF (Emergency Laparotomy and Frailty) study aimed to determine whether preoperative frailty in older adults was associated with increased dependence at the time of discharge.

Methods

The ELF study was a UK-wide multicentre prospective cohort study of older patients (65 years or more) undergoing emergency laparotomy during March and June 2017. The objective was to establish whether preoperative frailty was associated with increased care level at discharge compared with preoperative care level. The analysis used a multilevel logistic regression adjusted for preadmission frailty, patient age, sex and care level.

Results

A total of 934 patients were included from 49 hospitals. Mean(s.d.) age was 76·2(6·8) years, with 57·6 per cent women; 20·2 per cent were frail. Some 37·4 per cent of older adults had an increased care level at discharge. Increasing frailty was associated with increased discharge care level, with greater predictive power than age. The adjusted odds ratio for an increase in care level was 4·48 (95 per cent c.i. 2·03 to 9·91) for apparently vulnerable patients (Clinical Frailty Score (CFS) 4), 5·94 (2·54 to 13·90) for those mildly frail (CFS 5) and 7·88 (2·97 to 20·79) for those moderately or severely frail (CFS 6 or 7), compared with patients who were fit.

Conclusion

Over 37 per cent of older adults undergoing emergency laparotomy required increased care at discharge. Frailty scoring was a significant predictor, and should be integrated into all acute surgical units to aid shared decision-making and discharge planning.

eAppendicitis: Diagnostic uncertainty in appendicitis and the role of ehealth - does IT help?

The availability of medical information on the World Wide Web has grown as information technology has become more accessible. Patients seeking online information may be able to selfselect conditions having been adequately informed. This study evaluates the effect of eHealth information on those presenting to hospital with a suspected appendicitis and its effect on their management and clinical outcome. Patients who had performed online reading were more likely to go to theatre but were less likely to have a confirmed histological diagnosis of appendicitis.

Population-based cohort study of variation in the use of emergency cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder diseases

Background

The aims of this prospective population-based cohort study were to identify the patient and hospital characteristics associated with emergency cholecystectomy, and the influences of these in determining variations between hospitals.

Methods

Data were collected for consecutive patients undergoing cholecystectomy in acute UK and Irish hospitals between 1 March and 1 May 2014. Potential explanatory variables influencing the performance of emergency cholecystectomy were analysed by means of multilevel, multivariable logistic regression modelling using a two-level hierarchical structure with patients (level 1) nested within hospitals (level 2).

Results

Data were collected on 4744 cholecystectomies from 165 hospitals. Increasing age, lower ASA fitness grade, biliary colic, the need for further imaging (magnetic retrograde cholangiopancreatography), endoscopic interventions (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography) and admission to a non-biliary centre significantly reduced the likelihood of an emergency cholecystectomy being performed. The multilevel model was used to calculate the probability of receiving an emergency cholecystectomy for a woman aged 40 years or over with an ASA grade of I or II and a BMI of at least 25·0 kg/m2, who presented with acute cholecystitis with an ultrasound scan showing a thick-walled gallbladder and a normal common bile duct. The mean predicted probability of receiving an emergency cholecystectomy was 0·52 (95 per cent c.i. 0·45 to 0·57). The predicted probabilities ranged from 0·02 to 0·95 across the 165 hospitals, demonstrating significant variation between hospitals.

Conclusion

Patients with similar characteristics presenting to different hospitals with acute gallbladder pathology do not receive comparable care.