1
|
Stathi A, Withall J, Crone D, Hawley-Hague H, Playle R, Frew E, Fenton S, Hillsdon M, Pugh C, Todd C, Jolly K, Cavill N, Western M, Roche S, Kirby N, Boulton E, Thompson J, Chatwin K, Davies A, Szekeres Z, Greaves C. A peer-volunteer led active ageing programme to prevent decline in physical function in older people at risk of mobility disability (Active, Connected, Engaged [ACE]): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2023; 24:772. [PMID: 38031101 PMCID: PMC10687817 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07758-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Active Connected Engaged [ACE] study is a multi-centre, pragmatic, two-arm, parallel-group randomised controlled trial [RCT] with an internal pilot phase. The ACE study incorporates a multi-level mixed methods process evaluation including a systems mapping approach and an economic evaluation. ACE aims to test the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a peer-volunteer led active ageing intervention designed to support older adults at risk of mobility disability to become more physically and socially active within their communities and to reduce or reverse, the progression of functional limitations associated with ageing. METHODS/DESIGN Community-dwelling, older adults aged 65 years and older (n = 515), at risk of mobility disability due to reduced lower limb physical functioning (Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score of 4-9 inclusive) will be recruited. Participants will be randomised to receive either a minimal control intervention or ACE, a 6-month programme underpinned by behaviour change theory, whereby peer volunteers are paired with participants and offer them individually tailored support to engage them in local physical and social activities to improve lower limb mobility and increase their physical activity. Outcome data will be collected at baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months. The primary outcome analysis (difference in SPPB score at 18 months) will be undertaken blinded to group allocation. Primary comparative analyses will be on an intention-to-treat (ITT) basis with due emphasis placed on confidence intervals. DISCUSSION ACE is the largest, pragmatic, community-based randomised controlled trial in the UK to target this high-risk segment of the older population by mobilising community resources (peer volunteers). A programme that can successfully engage this population in sufficient activity to improve strength, coordination, balance and social connections would have a major impact on sustaining health and independence. ACE is also the first study of its kind to conduct a full economic and comprehensive process evaluation of this type of community-based intervention. If effective and cost-effective, the ACE intervention has strong potential to be implemented widely in the UK and elsewhere. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN, ISRCTN17660493. Registered on 30 September 2021. Trial Sponsor: University of Birmingham, Contact: Dr Birgit Whitman, Head of Research Governance and Integrity; Email: researchgovernance@contacts.bham.ac.uk. Protocol Version 5 22/07/22.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Afroditi Stathi
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
| | - Janet Withall
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Diane Crone
- Centre for Health, Activity and Wellbeing Research, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cyncoed Campus, Cyncoed Road, Cardiff, CF23 6XD, UK
| | - Helen Hawley-Hague
- School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research, Applied Research Collaboration-Greater Manchester, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Rebecca Playle
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK
| | - Emma Frew
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Sally Fenton
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Melvyn Hillsdon
- Department of Public Health and Sports Science, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Christopher Pugh
- Centre for Health, Activity and Wellbeing Research, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cyncoed Campus, Cyncoed Road, Cardiff, CF23 6XD, UK
| | - Chris Todd
- School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research, Applied Research Collaboration-Greater Manchester, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, M13 9NQ, UK
- Manchester Institute for Collaborative Research On Ageing, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| | - Kate Jolly
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | | | - Max Western
- Centre for Motivation and Health Behaviour Change, Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 4SY, UK
| | | | - Nigel Kirby
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK
| | | | - Janice Thompson
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Katie Chatwin
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Amy Davies
- School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Zsofia Szekeres
- Centre for Health, Activity and Wellbeing Research, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cyncoed Campus, Cyncoed Road, Cardiff, CF23 6XD, UK
| | - Colin Greaves
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ladlow P, Western MJ, Greaves CJ, Thompson JL, Withall J, de Koning J, Bollen JC, Moorlock SJ, Guralnik JM, Fox KR, Stathi A. The REtirement in ACTion exercise programme and its effects on elements of long term functionality in older adults. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1151035. [PMID: 37575112 PMCID: PMC10420051 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1151035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The prevention of mobility-related disability amongst adults is a global healthcare priority. Cost-effective community-based strategies to improve physical function and independence in older adults with mobility limitations are needed. This study investigated the effectiveness of the REtirement in ACTion (REACT) exercise intervention on individual markers of physical function at 6-and 12-months. Methods The REACT multicentre randomised controlled trial assigned 777 older adults (female, 514; male 263) (mean age 77·6 [SD 6·8] years) with reduced lower limb physical functioning (Short Physical Performance Battery [SPPB] score 4-9) to receive brief healthy ageing advice or a 12-month, group-based, multimodal exercise programme delivered in local communities. Estimated differences in the three individual component scores of the SPPB (strength, balance, gait speed) and physical functional outcomes recorded at 6- and 12-months were assessed. Results The intervention group demonstrated significant improvements in strength (OR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.36-2.59, p < 0.001) and balance (OR = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.39-2.67, p < 0.001) at 12-months, but not in gait speed (OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 0.91-1.90, p = 0.139). In comparison to the control group, at six-and 12-months, the intervention group reported statistically significant improvements in Mobility Assessment Tool-Short Form (MAT-SF), physical component score from SF-36 questionnaire, and strength and endurance items of subjectively reported physical activity (PASE 10-item). Greater than 75% adherence (attending ≥48 of the 64 exercise sessions delivered in 12-months) was associated with superior functional outcomes. Conclusion The REACT exercise programme provides local, regional and national service providers with an effective solution to increase muscle strength and balance in older adults at risk of mobility disability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Ladlow
- Department for Health, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
- Academic Department of Military Rehabilitation (ADMR), Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre (DMRC) Stanford Hall, Loughborough, United Kingdom
| | - Max J. Western
- Department for Health, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
| | - Colin J. Greaves
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Janice L. Thompson
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Janet Withall
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Jolanthe de Koning
- Department for Health, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
| | - Jessica C. Bollen
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah J. Moorlock
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Jack M. Guralnik
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Kenneth R. Fox
- Centre for Exercise, Sport and Health Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Afroditi Stathi
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cross R, Greaves C, Withall J, Kritz M, Stathi A. A qualitative longitudinal study of motivation in the REtirement in ACTion (REACT) physical activity intervention for older adults with mobility limitations. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2023; 20:50. [PMID: 37101268 PMCID: PMC10131311 DOI: 10.1186/s12966-023-01434-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Physical activity (PA) is beneficial for older adults' health, however they remain the least active age group in the UK. This qualitative longitudinal study aims to understand motivations in older adults receiving the REACT physical activity intervention, through the lens of self-determination theory. METHODS Participants were older adults randomised to the intervention arm of the Retirement in ACTion (REACT) Study, a group-based physical activity and behaviour maintenance intervention to prevent decline of physical functioning in older adults (≥ 65 years). Stratified purposive sampling by physical functioning (Short Physical Performance Battery scores) and 3-month attendance was employed. Fifty-one semi-structured interviews were conducted at 6, 12 and 24-months with twenty-nine older adults (Mean age (baseline) = 77.9 years, SD 6.86, 69% female) and at 24-months with twelve session leaders and two service managers. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using Framework Analysis. RESULTS Perceptions of autonomy, competence and relatedness were associated with adherence to the REACT programme and maintenance of an active lifestyle. Motivational processes and participants' support needs, changed during the 12-month REACT intervention and across the 12-months post-intervention. Group interactions were an important source of motivation during the first six months but increased competence and mobility drove motivation at the later stages (12 months) and post-intervention (24 months). CONCLUSIONS Motivational support needs vary in different stages of a 12-month group-based programme (adoption and adherence) and post-intervention (long-term maintenance). Strategies to accommodate those needs include, (a) making exercise social and enjoyable, (b) understanding participants' capabilities and tailoring the programme accordingly, (c) capitalising on group support to motivate participants to try other activities and prepare sustainable active living plans. TRIAL REGISTRATION The REACT study was a pragmatic multi-centre, two-arm, single-blind, parallel-group, RCT (ISRCTN registration number 45627165).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosina Cross
- Department for Health, University of Bath, Claverton Down, BA2 7AY, Bath, UK.
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, EX1 2LU, Exeter, UK.
| | - Colin Greaves
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B15 2TT, Birmingham, UK
| | - Janet Withall
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B15 2TT, Birmingham, UK
| | - Marlene Kritz
- Curtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Kent St, WA, 6102, Bentley, Australia
| | - Afroditi Stathi
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B15 2TT, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stathi A, Withall J, Greaves CJ, Thompson JL, Taylor G, Medina-Lara A, Green C, Snowsill T, Johansen-Berg H, Bilzon J, Gray S, Cross R, Western MJ, Koning JLD, Ladlow P, Bollen JC, Moorlock SJ, Guralnik JM, Rejeski WJ, Hillsdon M, Fox KR. A group-based exercise and behavioural maintenance intervention for adults over 65 years with mobility limitations: the REACT RCT. Public Health Res 2022. [DOI: 10.3310/mqbw6832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Mobility limitation in older age reduces quality of life, generates substantial health- and social-care costs, and increases mortality.
Objective
The REtirement in ACTion (REACT) trial aimed to establish whether or not a community-based active ageing intervention could prevent decline in physical functioning in older adults already at increased risk of mobility limitation.
Design
A multicentre, pragmatic, two-arm, parallel-group randomised controlled trial with parallel process and health economic evaluations.
Setting
Urban and semi-rural locations across three sites in England.
Participants
Physically frail or pre-frail older adults (aged ≥ 65 years; Short Physical Performance Battery score of 4–9). Recruitment was primarily via 35 primary care practices.
Interventions
Participants were randomly assigned to receive brief advice (three healthy ageing education sessions) or a 12-month, group-based, multimodal exercise and behavioural maintenance programme delivered in fitness and community centres. Randomisation was stratified by site and used a minimisation algorithm to balance age, sex and Short Physical Performance Battery score. Data collection and analyses were blinded.
Main outcome measures
The primary outcome was change in lower limb physical function (Short Physical Performance Battery score) at 24 months, analysed using an intention-to-treat analysis. The economic evaluation adopted the NHS and Personal Social Services perspective.
Results
Between June 2016 and October 2017, 777 participants (mean age 77.6 years, standard deviation 6.8 years; 66% female; mean Short Physical Performance Battery score 7.37, standard deviation 1.56) were randomised to the intervention arm (n = 410) or the control arm (n = 367). Data collection was completed in October 2019. Primary outcome data at 24 months were provided by 628 (80.8%) participants. At the 24-month follow-up, the Short Physical Performance Battery score was significantly greater in the intervention arm (mean 8.08, standard deviation 2.87) than in the control arm (mean 7.59, standard deviation 2.61), with an adjusted mean difference of 0.49 (95% confidence interval 0.06 to 0.92). The difference in lower limb function between intervention and control participants was clinically meaningful at both 12 and 24 months. Self-reported physical activity significantly increased in the intervention arm compared with the control arm, but this change was not observed in device-based physical activity data collected during the trial. One adverse event was related to the intervention. Attrition rates were low (19% at 24 months) and adherence was high. Engagement with the REACT intervention was associated with positive changes in exercise competence, relatedness and enjoyment and perceived physical, social and mental well-being benefits. The intervention plus usual care was cost-effective compared with care alone over the 2 years of REACT; the price year was 2019. In the base-case scenario, the intervention saved £103 per participant, with a quality-adjusted life-year gain of 0.04 (95% confidence interval 0.006 to 0.074) within the 2-year trial window. Lifetime horizon modelling estimated that further cost savings and quality-adjusted life-year gains were accrued up to 15 years post randomisation.
Conclusion
A relatively low-resource, 1-year multimodal exercise and behavioural maintenance intervention can help older adults to retain physical functioning over a 24-month period. The results indicate that the well-established trajectory of declining physical functioning in older age is modifiable.
Limitations
Participants were not blinded to study arm allocation. However, the primary outcome was independently assessed by blinded data collectors. The secondary outcome analyses were exploratory, with no adjustment for multiple testing, and should be interpreted accordingly.
Future work
Following refinements guided by the process evaluation findings, the REACT intervention is suitable for large-scale implementation. Further research will optimise implementation of REACT at scale.
Trial registration
This trial is registered as ISRCTN45627165.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme and will be published in full in Public Health Research; Vol. 10, No. 14. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Afroditi Stathi
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Colin J Greaves
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Janice L Thompson
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Gordon Taylor
- University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, Exeter, UK
| | | | - Colin Green
- University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, Exeter, UK
| | - Tristan Snowsill
- University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, Exeter, UK
| | - Heidi Johansen-Berg
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Oxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - James Bilzon
- Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - Selena Gray
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Rosina Cross
- Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | | | | | - Peter Ladlow
- Academic Department of Military Rehabilitation, Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre, Loughborough, UK
| | - Jessica C Bollen
- University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, Exeter, UK
| | - Sarah J Moorlock
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jack M Guralnik
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - W Jack Rejeski
- Department of Health and Exercise Science, Wake Forest University, Worrell Professional Centre, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Melvyn Hillsdon
- College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Kenneth R Fox
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Withall J, de Koning J, Cross R, Sutton K, Greaves C, Bollen J, Moorlock S, Lee L, Clynes J, Stathi A. O2-2 Should I stay or should I go? A mixed-methods, longitudinal investigation of predictors, barriers and enablers of adherence to REACT, a 12-month group-based, active-ageing programme. Eur J Public Health 2022. [PMCID: PMC9421877 DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac094.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Physical activity (PA) programmes targeting older adults often report relatively low attendance rates which limits impact. Research into barriers and enablers of PA adherence is often qualitative and rarely tests outcomes against objectively monitored adherence to assess whether what people say is actually reflected in what they do. This study adopts a rare, mixed methods, longitudinal perspective identifying subjective and objective predictors of and associations with adherence to REtirement in ACTion (REACT), a 12-month physical activity intervention for frail or pre-frail older adults.
Methods
Semi-structured interviews conducted at six (n = 17) and 12 months (n = 10) explored barriers and enablers to adherence. Thematic analysis led to ten adherence related research hypotheses. These were tested by examining correlations between REACT programme attendance and physical function (Short Physical Performance Battery), self-rated physical function (mobility assessment tool-short form (MAT-sf)), dominant hand grip strength assessed by digital dynamometer, Ageing Well profile (social scale), process evaluation data at baseline (n = 411) and six-months (n = 348) and open-ended participant feedback at six-months (n = 307). Each participant response was scored -1) for a negative comment, 1 for positive or zero for no comment or balancing negative and positive comments.
Results
Higher adherence correlated with younger age (r=-0.162, p > 0.001), better physical function, both objectively measured (r = 0.118, p > 0.05) and self-rated (r = 0.134, p > 0.01), greater grip strength (r = 0.118, p > 0.05) and having less social contact (r=-0.134, p > 0.01), at baseline. It also correlated with an improvement in objectively measured physical function between baseline and six months (r = 0.200, p > 0.001). At 6-months enjoyment of the programme (r = 0.263, p > 0.001), specifically enjoyment of muscle-strengthening exercises (r = 0.142, p > 0.027), perception of positive social interactions (from questionnaire data (r = 0.212, p > 0.001) and open-ended feedback (r = 0.157, p > 0.01)) and perceptions of an autonomy-supportive teaching style (r = 0.213, p > 0.001) all correlated with higher adherence.
Conclusions
PA programmes for older adults should encourage the development of social connections and group cohesion but should take a flexible approach to avoid negatively affecting adherence amongst those with pre-existing high levels of social contact. Building confidence in PA and physical function as these improve during the programme, promoting enjoyment and utilising an autonomy-supportive leader teaching style are important in order to support adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet Withall
- Department for Health, University of Bath , Bath, United Kingdom
| | | | - Rosina Cross
- Department for Health, University of Bath , Bath, United Kingdom
| | - Kate Sutton
- Department for Health, University of Bath , Bath, United Kingdom
| | - Colin Greaves
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham , Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Jess Bollen
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter , Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Moorlock
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham , Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Linda Lee
- Department for Health, University of Bath , Bath, United Kingdom
| | - James Clynes
- Department for Health, University of Bath , Bath, United Kingdom
| | - Afroditi Stathi
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham , Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Stathi A, Withall J, Agyapong-Badu S, Barrett E, Kritz M, Thogersen-Ntoumani C, Whitaker I, Toon H, Fox K. O2-5 Mobilising People as Assets for community-based active ageing promotion: A multi-stakeholder perspective on peer volunteering initiatives. Eur J Public Health 2022. [PMCID: PMC9435369 DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac094.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Citizens who contribute as volunteers and peer mentors within a community are important assets that can be mobilised to improve health and wellbeing. In order to optimise the contribution of peer-volunteers to active ageing initiatives, we need to understand their experiences and identify ways to support them in preparing for the role and overcoming potential challenges. Aim: This study synthesises the perspectives of a range of stakeholders involved in peer volunteering active ageing initiatives implemented in UK and provides an in-depth account of how such initiatives can effectively mobilise individuals as community assets. It draws on the experience of all actors involved in such initiatives, ranging from volunteers, recipients of volunteering actions, volunteer managers and volunteering service providers. Methods This evidence synthesis used qualitative data from (a) three studies focusing on the development (phase 1), feasibility trial evaluation (phase 2) and community roll-out (phase 3) of ACE (Active, Connected, Engaged), a peer volunteering active ageing intervention, alongside (b) the experiences of third sector organisations in providing peer volunteering programmes. Ten managers, 22 volunteers and 20 ACE participants were interviewed. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using framework analysis. Results Seven main themes including 33 higher and 22 lower order themes were identified: Motives; Benefits; Characteristics of peer volunteers; Challenges; Training needs; Recruitment; Successful strategies for maintenance. Altruism, changes in life circumstances, opportunities to reconnect with the community and personal fulfilment were the main reasons for volunteering. Volunteering was described as being personally rewarding, an avenue to acquire new skills and knowledge, and increased social connections and physical activity. Effective volunteers are committed, reliable, have a good sense of humour, good interpersonal skills and are able to relate to the participants. When pairing volunteers with participants, clarity of role, level of time commitment, shared interests and geographical proximity are worth considering. Conclusions Successful implementation of peer-volunteering initiatives requires the use of appropriate recruitment routes, easy joining procedures, provision of ongoing support, good communication across all stakeholders, feedback and recognition of effort and a dedicated team to build resilience and provide volunteers with administrative support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Afroditi Stathi
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham , Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Janet Withall
- Department for Health, University of Bath , Bath, United Kingdom
| | - Sandra Agyapong-Badu
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham , Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Eva Barrett
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, National University of Ireland , Galway, Ireland
| | - Marlene Kritz
- School of Psychology, Curtin University , Perth, Australia, Austria
| | | | - Isobel Whitaker
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham , Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Harry Toon
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham , Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Kenneth Fox
- School of Policy Studies, University of Bristol , Bristol, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cross R, Greaves CJ, Withall J, Rejeski WJ, Stathi A. Delivery fidelity of the REACT (REtirement in ACTion) physical activity and behaviour maintenance intervention for community dwelling older people with mobility limitations. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:1112. [PMID: 35658857 PMCID: PMC9166457 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13496-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fidelity assessment of behaviour change interventions is vital to understanding trial outcomes. This study assesses the delivery fidelity of behaviour change techniques used in the Retirement in ACTion (REACT) randomised controlled trial. REACT is a community-based physical activity (PA) and behaviour maintenance intervention to prevent decline of physical functioning in older adults (≥ 65 years) at high risk of mobility-related disability in the UK. METHODS The delivery fidelity of intervention behaviour change techniques and delivery processes were assessed using multi-observer coding of purposively sampled in-vivo audio recordings (n = 25) of health behaviour maintenance sessions over 12-months. Delivery fidelity was scored using a modified Dreyfus scale (scores 0-5) to assess competence and completeness of delivery for each technique and delivery process. "Competent delivery" was defined as a score of 3 points or more for each item. Examples of competent intervention delivery were identified to inform recommendations for future programme delivery and training. RESULTS The mean intervention fidelity score was 2.5 (SD 0.45) with delivery fidelity varying between techniques/processes and intervention groups. Person-centred delivery, Facilitating Enjoyment and Promoting Autonomy were delivered competently (scoring 3.0 or more). There was scope for improvement (score 2.0-2.9) in Monitoring Progress (Acknowledging and Reviewing), Self-Monitoring, Monitoring Progress (Eliciting Benefits of Physical Activity), Goal Setting and Action Planning, Modelling, Supporting Self-Efficacy for Physical Activity and Supporting Relatedness. Managing Setbacks and Problem Solving was delivered with low fidelity. Numerous examples of both good and sub-optimal practice were identified. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights successes and improvements needed to enhance delivery fidelity in future implementation of the behavioural maintenance programme of the REACT intervention. Future training of REACT session leaders and assessment of delivery fidelity needs to focus on the delivery of Goal setting and Action Planning, Modelling, Supporting Relatedness, Supporting Self-Efficacy for Physical Activity, and Managing Setbacks/ Problem Solving.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosina Cross
- Department for Health, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
| | - Colin J. Greaves
- grid.6572.60000 0004 1936 7486School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Sciences, University of Birmingham, Egbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT UK
| | - Janet Withall
- grid.6572.60000 0004 1936 7486School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Sciences, University of Birmingham, Egbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT UK
| | - W. Jack. Rejeski
- grid.241167.70000 0001 2185 3318Department of Health and Exercise Science, Wake Forest University, Worrell Professional Centre, 2164B, PO Box 7868, Winston-Salem, NC 27109 USA
| | - Afroditi Stathi
- grid.6572.60000 0004 1936 7486School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Sciences, University of Birmingham, Egbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Stathi A, Greaves CJ, Thompson JL, Withall J, Ladlow P, Taylor G, Medina-Lara A, Snowsill T, Gray S, Green C, Johansen-Berg H, Sexton CE, Bilzon JLJ, deKoning J, Bollen JC, Moorlock SJ, Western MJ, Demnitz N, Seager P, Guralnik JM, Rejeski WJ, Hillsdon M, Fox KR. Effect of a physical activity and behaviour maintenance programme on functional mobility decline in older adults: the REACT (Retirement in Action) randomised controlled trial. Lancet Public Health 2022; 7:e316-e326. [PMID: 35325627 PMCID: PMC8967718 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-2667(22)00004-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Revised: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mobility limitations in old age can greatly reduce quality of life, generate substantial health and social care costs, and increase mortality. Through the Retirement in Action (REACT) trial, we aimed to establish whether a community-based active ageing intervention could prevent decline in lower limb physical functioning in older adults already at increased risk of mobility limitation. METHODS In this pragmatic, multicentre, two-arm, single-blind, parallel-group, randomised, controlled trial, we recruited older adults (aged 65 years or older and who are not in full-time employment) with reduced lower limb physical functioning (Short Physical Performance Battery [SPPB] score 4-9) from 35 primary care practices across three sites (Bristol and Bath; Birmingham; and Devon) in England. Participants were randomly assigned to receive brief advice (three healthy ageing education sessions) or a 12-month, group-based, multimodal physical activity (64 1-h exercise sessions) and behavioural maintenance (21 45-min sessions) programme delivered by charity and community or leisure centre staff in local communities. Randomisation was stratified by site and adopted a minimisation approach to balance groups by age, sex, and SPPB score, using a centralised, online, randomisation algorithm. Researchers involved in data collection and analysis were masked but participants were not because of the nature of the intervention. The primary outcome was change in SPPB score at 24 months, analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN45627165. FINDINGS Between June 20, 2016, and Oct 30, 2017, 777 participants (mean age 77·6 [SD 6·8] years; 66% female; mean SPPB score 7·37 [1·56]) were randomly assigned to the intervention (n=410) and control (n=367) groups. Primary outcome data at 24 months were provided by 628 (81%) participants (294 in the control group and 334 in the intervention group). At the 24-month follow-up, the SPPB score (adjusted for baseline SPPB score, age, sex, study site, and exercise group) was significantly greater in the intervention group (mean 8·08 [SD 2·87]) than in the control group (mean 7·59 [2·61]), with an adjusted mean difference of 0·49 (95% CI 0·06-0·92; p=0·014), which is just below our predefined clinically meaningful difference of 0·50. One adverse event was related to the intervention; the most common unrelated adverse events were heart conditions, strokes, and falls. INTERPRETATION For older adults at risk of mobility limitations, the REACT intervention showed that a 12-month physical activity and behavioural maintenance programme could help prevent decline in physical function over a 24-month period. FUNDING National Institute for Health Research Public Health Research Programme (13/164/51).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Afroditi Stathi
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| | - Colin J Greaves
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Janice L Thompson
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Janet Withall
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - Peter Ladlow
- Academic Department of Military Rehabilitation (ADMR), Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre (DMRC), Stanford Hall, Loughborough, UK
| | - Gordon Taylor
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | | | - Tristan Snowsill
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Selena Gray
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England (UWE) Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Colin Green
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Heidi Johansen-Berg
- Oxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Claire E Sexton
- Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK; Global Brain Health Institute, Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Jessica C Bollen
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Sarah J Moorlock
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Naiara Demnitz
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital -Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Poppy Seager
- Oxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jack M Guralnik
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - W Jack Rejeski
- Department of Health and Exercise Science, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Melvyn Hillsdon
- College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Kenneth R Fox
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Demnitz N, Stathi A, Withall J, Stainer C, Seager P, De Koning J, Esser P, Wassenaar T, Dawes H, Brooks J, Ebmeier KP, Johansen-Berg H, Sexton CE. Hippocampal maintenance after a 12-month physical activity intervention in older adults: The REACT MRI study. Neuroimage Clin 2021; 35:102762. [PMID: 35361556 PMCID: PMC9421470 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Revised: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Physical activity interventions have had varying results on modifying hippocampal volume. METHODS The Retirement in Action (REACT) study conducted a randomised-controlled trial of a 12-month physical activity and behaviour maintenance intervention in older adults at risk of mobility impairments. The physical activity sessions were delivered twice weekly for the first twelve weeks, and then reduced to once weekly, to groups of 15 participants. Activities included cardiovascular, strength, balance and flexibility exercises. A sub-sample of participants in the physical activity (N = 54) and control arms (N = 48) underwent a 3 T MRI brain scan and cognitive assessments at baseline, 6- and 12-months (mean age = 76.6 years, 6.8 SD). It was hypothesised that the intervention would lead to a reduced rate of decline in hippocampal volume. Group differences in changes in cognition were also examined. RESULTS As hypothesised, we found a maintenance in left hippocampal volume in the intervention arm, in comparison with the control arm after 12 months (p = 0.027). In a secondary analysis, this effect was attenuated after including age, sex and education level as covariates (p = 0.057). There was no significant between-group difference in the right hippocampus (p = 0.405). Contrary to our hypothesis, we did not find a beneficial effect of the intervention on cognitive outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that a community-based physical activity intervention can significantly ward-off hippocampal atrophy in older adults. While the lack of effects on cognition may limit the interpretability of our results, our findings of hippocampal maintenance are promising given the potential clinical relevance of protecting the hippocampus from age-related decline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naiara Demnitz
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford OX3 7JX, UK; Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark.
| | - Afroditi Stathi
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Janet Withall
- Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK
| | - Candida Stainer
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB Centre, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Poppy Seager
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB Centre, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
| | | | - Patrick Esser
- Centre for Movement, Occupation and Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford OX3 0FL, UK
| | - Thomas Wassenaar
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB Centre, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Helen Dawes
- Centre for Movement, Occupation and Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford OX3 0FL, UK
| | - Jonathan Brooks
- Clinical Research and Imaging Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol BS2 8DX, UK
| | - Klaus P Ebmeier
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford OX3 7JX, UK
| | - Heidi Johansen-Berg
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB Centre, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Claire E Sexton
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB Centre, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Stathi A, Withall J, Agyapong-Badu S, Barrett E, Kritz M, Wills D, Thogersen-Ntoumani C, Fox KR. Mobilising people as assets for active ageing promotion: a multi-stakeholder perspective on peer volunteering initiatives. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:150. [PMID: 33461519 PMCID: PMC7812118 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-10136-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2020] [Accepted: 12/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Successful peer volunteering is central to many community-based, active ageing initiatives. This study synthesises the perspectives of a range of stakeholders involved in peer volunteering initiatives and provides recommendations as to how peer volunteers can be effectively mobilised as community assets. METHODS An evidence synthesis of qualitative data from (a) the evaluation of ACE (Active, Connected, Engaged), a feasibility trial of a peer volunteering active ageing intervention, and (b) interviews with volunteers and managers of third sector organisations providing peer volunteering programmes. Data were analysed using directed content analysis. RESULTS Ten managers, 22 volunteers and 20 ACE participants were interviewed. The analysis identified six main themes, 33 higher and 22 sub themes. Main themes were: (i) Motives, (ii) Benefits, (iii) Skills and Characteristics, (iv) Challenges, (v) Training Needs, (vi) Recruitment and Retention. Altruism, changes in life circumstances, opportunities to reconnect with the community and personal fulfilment were the main reasons for volunteering. Volunteering was described as being personally rewarding, an avenue to acquire new skills and knowledge, and an opportunity for increased social connections and physical activity. Good peer volunteers are committed, reliable, have a good sense of humour, good interpersonal skills and are able to relate to participants. When pairing volunteers with participants, shared interests and geographical proximity are important to consider. Clarity of role, level of time commitment, regular feedback, recognition of effort and strong networks for on-going support are important strategies to facilitate volunteer retention. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this study support the value of peer volunteering as a strategy for mobilising community assets in promoting active ageing. To ensure success and longevity, these schemes require appropriate funding and efficient administrative support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Afroditi Stathi
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | | | - Sandra Agyapong-Badu
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Eva Barrett
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Marlene Kritz
- School of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | | | | | - Kenneth R. Fox
- School of Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Stathi A, Withall J, Thompson JL, Davis MG, Gray S, De Koning J, Parkhurst G, Lloyd L, Greaves C, Laventure R, Fox KR. Feasibility Trial Evaluation of a Peer Volunteering Active Aging Intervention: ACE (Active, Connected, Engaged). Gerontologist 2020; 60:571-582. [PMID: 30779849 PMCID: PMC7117619 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnz003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2018] [Revised: 12/17/2018] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND ACE (Active, Connected, Engaged) is a theory-informed, pragmatic intervention using peer volunteering support to promote active ageing in socially disengaged, inactive older adults. This study aimed to establish ACE's feasibility and acceptability. METHODS Fifty-four older adults were recruited as either peer volunteers (activators; n = 15) or participants (ACEs; n = 39). Participants were randomized to one-to-one support from an activator (ACEs-Intervention [ACEs-I]) or a waiting-list control group (ACEs-Control [ACEs-C]). Activators supported ACEs-I to get out more and engage with local activities. Objectively measured physical activity (PA), lower limb function, and number of out of house activities were assessed at baseline and post-intervention. A mixed-methods process evaluation assessed changes in confidence to get out and about, social support, autonomy, competence, and relatedness. RESULTS Eighty-two percent of ACEs (mean age = 73.7 years [SD 7.3]) and all activators completed assessments at both baseline and post-intervention (6 months). ACEs-I reported more out of house activities (M [SD] = 6.34 [4.15]). ACEs-I increased physical function post-intervention (M [SD] = 9.8 [2.3]). ACEs-I reported improved well-being and vitality and increased confidence to get out and about, confidence in the face of specific barriers, knowledge of local initiatives, and perceived social support post-intervention. Activators, although sufficiently active at baseline, increased their PA further. ACE was well-accepted and easy to deliver. CONCLUSIONS ACE is an acceptable and feasible intervention for helping socially disengaged older people to get out and about more, improve their confidence, and engage more with their community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Afroditi Stathi
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Janice L Thompson
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK
| | - Mark G Davis
- Physical Activity Measurement Consultant, Bwlch, Wales, UK
| | - Selena Gray
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Graham Parkhurst
- Centre for Transport and Society, Department of Geography and Environmental Management, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - Liz Lloyd
- School of Policy Studies, University of Bristol, UK
| | - Colin Greaves
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Withall J, Greaves CJ, Thompson JL, de Koning JL, Bollen JC, Moorlock SJ, Fox KR, Western MJ, Snowsill T, Medina-Lara A, Cross R, Ladlow P, Taylor G, Zisi V, Clynes J, Gray S, Agyapong-Badu S, Guralnik JM, Rejeski WJ, Stathi A. The Tribulations of Trials: Lessons Learnt Recruiting 777 Older Adults Into REtirement in ACTion (REACT), a Trial of a Community, Group-Based Active Aging Intervention Targeting Mobility Disability. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2020; 75:2387-2395. [PMID: 32147709 PMCID: PMC7662171 DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glaa051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Challenges of recruitment to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and successful strategies to overcome them should be clearly reported to improve recruitment into future trials. REtirement in ACTion (REACT) is a United Kingdom-based multicenter RCT recruiting older adults at high risk of mobility disability to a 12-month group-based exercise and behavior maintenance program or to a minimal Healthy Aging control intervention. METHODS The recruitment target was 768 adults, aged 65 years and older scoring 4-9 on the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). Recruitment methods include the following: (a) invitations mailed by general practitioners (GPs); (b) invitations distributed via third-sector organizations; and (c) public relations (PR) campaign. Yields, efficiency, and costs were calculated. RESULTS The study recruited 777 (33.9% men) community-dwelling, older adults (mean age 77.55 years (SD 6.79), mean SPPB score 7.37 (SD 1.56)), 95.11% white (n = 739) and broadly representative of UK quintiles of deprivation. Over a 20-month recruitment period, 25,559 invitations were issued. Eighty-eight percent of the participants were recruited via GP invitations, 5.4% via the PR campaign, 3% via word-of-mouth, and 2.5% via third-sector organizations. Mean recruitment cost per participant was £78.47, with an extra £26.54 per recruit paid to GPs to cover research costs. CONCLUSIONS REACT successfully recruited to target. Response rates were lower than initially predicted and recruitment timescales required adjustment. Written invitations from GPs were the most efficient method for recruiting older adults at risk of mobility disability. Targeted efforts could achieve more ethnically diverse cohorts. All trials should be required to provide recruitment data to enable evidence-based planning of future trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet Withall
- Department for Health, University of Bath, UK,Address correspondence to: Janet Withall, PhD, Department for Health, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, UK. E-mail:
| | - Colin J Greaves
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK
| | - Janice L Thompson
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | - Sarah J Moorlock
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK
| | - Kenneth R Fox
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, UK
| | | | - Tristan Snowsill
- Institute of Health Research, College of Medicine and Health, South Cloisters, University of Exeter, St Luke’s Campus, UK
| | | | | | - Peter Ladlow
- Academic Department of Military Rehabilitation (ADMR), Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre (DMRC) Stanford Hall, Loughborough, UK
| | - Gordon Taylor
- University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, UK
| | - Vasiliki Zisi
- Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Thessaly, Trikala, Greece
| | | | - Selena Gray
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences (HAS), University of the West of England (UWE Bristol), Frenchay Campus, Bristol, UK
| | - Sandra Agyapong-Badu
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK
| | - Jack M Guralnik
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland, School of Medicine, Baltimore
| | - W Jack Rejeski
- Department of Health and Exercise Science, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Afroditi Stathi
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Stathi A, Withall J, Greaves CJ, Thompson JL, Taylor G, Medina-Lara A, Green C, Bilzon J, Gray S, Johansen-Berg H, Sexton CE, Western MJ, de Koning JL, Bollen JC, Moorlock SJ, Demnitz N, Seager P, Guralnik JM, Jack Rejeski W, Fox KR. A community-based physical activity intervention to prevent mobility-related disability for retired older people (REtirement in ACTion (REACT)): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2018; 19:228. [PMID: 29665854 PMCID: PMC5905123 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-2603-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2017] [Accepted: 03/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The REtirement in ACTion (REACT) study is a multi-centre, pragmatic, two-arm, parallel-group randomised controlled trial (RCT) with an internal pilot phase. It aims to test the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a community, group-based physical activity intervention for reducing, or reversing, the progression of functional limitations in older people who are at high risk of mobility-related disability. METHODS/DESIGN A sample of 768 sedentary, community-dwelling, older people aged 65 years and over with functional limitations, but who are still ambulatory (scores between 4 and 9 out of 12 in the Short Physical Performance Battery test (SPPB)) will be randomised to receive either the REACT intervention, delivered over a period of 12 months by trained facilitators, or a minimal control intervention. The REACT study incorporates comprehensive process and economic evaluation and a nested sub-study which will test the hypothesis that the REACT intervention will slow the rate of brain atrophy and of decline in cognitive function assessed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Outcome data will be collected at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months for the main study, with MRI sub-study data collected at baseline, 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome analysis (SPPB score at 24 months) will be undertaken blinded to group allocation. Primary comparative analyses will be on an intention-to-treat (ITT) basis with due emphasis placed on confidence intervals. DISCUSSION REACT represents the first large-scale, pragmatic, community-based trial in the UK to target the non-disabled but high-risk segment of the older population with an intervention to reduce mobility-related disability. A programme that can successfully engage this population in sufficient activity to improve strength, aerobic capacity, coordination and balance would have a major impact on sustaining health and independence. REACT is also the first study of its kind to conduct a full economic and comprehensive process evaluation alongside the RCT. If effective and cost-effective, the REACT intervention has strong potential to be implemented widely in the UK and elsewhere. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN, ID: ISRCTN45627165 . Retrospectively registered on 13 June 2016. Trial sponsor: University of Bath. Protocol Version 1.5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Afroditi Stathi
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
| | - Janet Withall
- 0000 0001 2162 1699grid.7340.0Department for Health, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY UK
| | - Colin J. Greaves
- 0000 0004 1936 8024grid.8391.3University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU UK
| | - Janice L. Thompson
- 0000 0004 1936 7486grid.6572.6School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT UK
| | - Gordon Taylor
- 0000 0001 2162 1699grid.7340.0Department for Health, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY UK
| | - Antonieta Medina-Lara
- 0000 0004 1936 8024grid.8391.3University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU UK
| | - Colin Green
- 0000 0004 1936 8024grid.8391.3University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU UK
| | - James Bilzon
- 0000 0001 2162 1699grid.7340.0Department for Health, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY UK
| | - Selena Gray
- 0000 0001 2034 5266grid.6518.aFaculty of Health and Applied Sciences (HAS), University of the West of England (UWE Bristol), Frenchay Campus, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol, BS16 1QY UK
| | - Heidi Johansen-Berg
- 0000 0004 1936 8948grid.4991.5Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Claire E. Sexton
- 0000 0004 1936 8948grid.4991.5Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, OX3 7JX UK ,0000 0001 2297 6811grid.266102.1Global Brain Health Institute, Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA
| | - Max J. Western
- 0000 0001 2162 1699grid.7340.0Department for Health, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY UK
| | - Jolanthe L. de Koning
- 0000 0001 2162 1699grid.7340.0Department for Health, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY UK
| | - Jessica C. Bollen
- 0000 0004 1936 8024grid.8391.3University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU UK
| | - Sarah J. Moorlock
- 0000 0004 1936 7486grid.6572.6School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT UK
| | - Naiara Demnitz
- 0000 0004 1936 8948grid.4991.5Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, OX3 7JX UK
| | - Poppy Seager
- 0000 0004 1936 8948grid.4991.5Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jack M. Guralnik
- 0000 0001 2175 4264grid.411024.2Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland, School of Medicine, 655 West Baltimore Street, Baltimore, MD 21201-1559 USA
| | - W. Jack Rejeski
- 0000 0001 2185 3318grid.241167.7Department of Health and Exercise Science, Wake Forest University, Worrell Professional Center 2164B, PO Box 7868, Winston-Salem, NC 27109 USA
| | - Ken R. Fox
- 0000 0004 1936 7603grid.5337.2Centre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TZ UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Withall J, Thompson JL, Fox KR, Davis M, Gray S, de Koning J, Lloyd L, Parkhurst G, Stathi A. Participant and Public Involvement in Refining a Peer-Volunteering Active Aging Intervention: Project ACE (Active, Connected, Engaged). Gerontologist 2018; 58:362-375. [PMID: 27927733 PMCID: PMC5946893 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnw148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2016] [Accepted: 10/11/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Evidence for the health benefits of a physically active lifestyle among older adults is strong, yet only a small proportion of older people meet physical activity recommendations. A synthesis of evidence identified "best bet" approaches, and this study sought guidance from end-user representatives and stakeholders to refine one of these, a peer-volunteering active aging intervention. Methods Focus groups with 28 older adults and four professional volunteer managers were conducted. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 9 older volunteers. Framework analysis was used to gauge participants' views on the ACE intervention. Results Motives for engaging in community groups and activities were almost entirely social. Barriers to participation were lack of someone to attend with, lack of confidence, fear of exclusion or "cliquiness" in established groups, bad weather, transport issues, inaccessibility of activities, ambivalence, and older adults being "set in their ways". Motives for volunteering included "something to do," avoiding loneliness, the need to feel needed, enjoyment, and altruism. Challenges included negative events between volunteer and recipient of volunteering support, childcare commitments, and high volunteering workload. Conclusion Peer-volunteering approaches have great potential for promotion of active aging. The systematic multistakeholder approach adopted in this study led to important refinements of the original ACE intervention. The findings provide guidance for active aging community initiatives highlighting the importance of effective recruitment strategies and of tackling major barriers including lack of motivation, confidence, and readiness to change; transport issues; security concerns and cost; activity availability; and lack of social support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet Withall
- Department for Health, University of Bath, Claverton Down, UK
| | - Janice L Thompson
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK
| | - Kenneth R Fox
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, UK
| | - Mark Davis
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, UK
| | - Selena Gray
- Centre for Transport and Society, Department of Geography and Environmental Management, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Liz Lloyd
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, UK
| | - Graham Parkhurst
- Centre for Transport and Society, Department of Geography and Environmental Management, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - Afroditi Stathi
- Department for Health, University of Bath, Claverton Down, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Withall J, Haase AM, Walsh NE, Young A, Cramp F. Physical activity engagement in early rheumatoid arthritis: a qualitative study to inform intervention development. Physiotherapy 2016; 102:264-71. [DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2015.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2015] [Accepted: 07/25/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
16
|
Cramp F, Withall J, Haase A, Walsh N, Young A, Hewlett S. SAT0643-HPR Development of a Physical Activity Programme for People with Recently Diagnosed Rheumatoid Arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2015. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-eular.1647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
17
|
Withall J, Stathi A, Davis M, Coulson J, Thompson JL, Fox KR. Objective indicators of physical activity and sedentary time and associations with subjective well-being in adults aged 70 and over. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2014; 11:643-56. [PMID: 24452258 PMCID: PMC3924465 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph110100643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2013] [Revised: 12/18/2013] [Accepted: 12/23/2013] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
This study explored the associations of the volume and intensity of physical activity and the volume of sedentary time with subjective well-being in a diverse group of 228 older adults in the UK (111 female, mean age 78.2 years (SD 5.8)). Physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviour were assessed by accelerometry deriving mean steps per day, mean moderate/vigorous PA minutes per hour (MVPA min · h(-1)) and minutes of sedentary time per hour (ST min · h(-1)). Lower limb function was assessed by the Short Physical Performance Battery. Subjective well-being was assessed using the SF-12 health status scale, the Ageing Well Profile and the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Linear regressions were used to investigate associations between the independent variables which included physical activity (steps and MVPA), sedentary time, participant characteristics (gender, age, BMI, education, number of medical conditions), and lower limb function and dependent variables which included mental and physical well-being. Steps, MVPA and lower limb function were independently and moderately positively associated with perceived physical well-being but relationships with mental well-being variables were weak. No significant associations between sedentary behaviours and well-being were observed. The association between objectively evaluated physical activity and function and subjective evaluations of physical well-being suggest that improving perceptions of physical health and function may provide an important target for physical activity programmes. This in turn may drive further activity participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet Withall
- Department for Health, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, UK.
| | - Afroditi Stathi
- Department for Health, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, UK.
| | - Mark Davis
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TZ, UK.
| | - Jo Coulson
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TZ, UK.
| | - Janice L Thompson
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TZ, UK.
| | - Kenneth R Fox
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TZ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Withall J, Jago R, Fox KR. Why some do but most don't. Barriers and enablers to engaging low-income groups in physical activity programmes: a mixed methods study. BMC Public Health 2011; 11:507. [PMID: 21711514 PMCID: PMC3141466 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2011] [Accepted: 06/28/2011] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The beneficial effect of physical activity for the prevention of a range of chronic diseases is widely acknowledged. These chronic conditions are most pronounced in economically disadvantaged groups where physical activity levels are consistently lower, yet this group is particularly difficult to recruit and retain in physical activity programmes. This study examined the perceptions of participants, non-participants, and exercise leaders in a low-income area regarding barriers, motives, and enabling factors for organised physical activity with a view to improving recruitment and retention. METHODS A mixed methods research approach was adopted to guide data collection and analysis. A survey, incorporating the Motivation for Physical Activity Measure - Revised (MPAM-R), was used to assess the motivations of 152 physical activity session participants in a highly deprived suburban neighbourhood. The MPAM-R data were analysed using t tests, analyses of variance to estimate age, body mass index, and activity mode differences and Pearson's correlation coefficient to address associations. Semi-structured interviews were also conducted with 33 local residents who did not participate in activity sessions and with 14 activity session leaders. All interviews were audio-taped, transcribed verbatim and analyzed using an inductive thematic approach. RESULTS Participants reported cost, childcare, lack of time and low awareness as barriers to joining activity classes. The need for support, confidence and competence in order to take up activity was widely expressed, particularly among women. Once people are active, high levels of social interaction, interest and enjoyment are associated with improved levels of retention, with different types of physical activity scoring differently on these factors. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that some factors such as cost, the fear of 'walking in alone', accessibility of facilities, and appropriate communication strategies may be of particular importance to increasing recruitment of low income groups. Interventions targeting this group should consider low cost sessions and childcare; activities popular with the target group and associated with good recruitment and retention; sessions held at accessible times; a focus on fun and socialising; well-researched and designed communications strategies; targeting of friendship groups; clearly branded beginners' sessions, and the potential of social marketing as strategies. The evidence presented here suggests that the current UK government approach designed to 'enable and guide people's choices' may not be sufficient if low-income groups are to be effectively supported in changing their health behaviours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet Withall
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TZ, UK
| | - Russell Jago
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TZ, UK
| | - Kenneth R Fox
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TZ, UK
| |
Collapse
|