State of viral hepatitis care in 16 countries of Central and Eastern European Region

OBJECTIVES

Survey was conducted to assess state of viral hepatitis care in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE).

METHODS

Representatives of 16 CEE countries completed on-line survey in April-May 2017 that collected information on basic epidemiology and availability of key services for HCV and HBV infections. Sources of information provided ranged from national surveillance data to expert opinion.

RESULTS

The burden of viral hepatitis varied between countries, ranging from 6,500 to 2 million for HCV and from 10,000 to 3 million for HBV. Access to routine HCV RNA testing and genotyping was reported by 11 and 9 countries, respectively. HCV resistance testing was available in 7 countries. Direct acting antivirals (DAAs) were available in 13 countries, most frequently Sofosbuvir and Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir (12 countries apiece) and Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Dasabuvir (9 countries). HBV DNA testing and HBV genotyping were routinely available in 10 and 7 countries, respectively. Eleven countries reported available treatment with Tenofovir.

CONCLUSIONS

There are gaps in viral hepatitis care in CEE. Despite the availability of registered modern drugs for HCV and HBV, the access to treatment is limited. Ensuring quality health care is essential to reduce the epidemic and achieve the WHO's goal of eliminating viral hepatitis as a major public health challenge.

Boceprevir in genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C: first experiences in Serbia

INTRODUCTION

The triple therapy which consists of one of the protease inhibitor plus pegylated interferon and ribavirin (P/R) is the standard of care for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 (G1) infection both in treatment-naïve and experienced patients.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to analyze the efficacy and tolerability of this regime in hospital practice in Serbia.

METHODS

From July 2012 to October 2012, 20 previously treated patients with advanced fibrosis and HCV G1 infection were included in the triple antiviral regimen in six referral centers in Serbia. All patients were treated with response guide therapy (RGT) regime according to the boceprevir treatment protocol. During the 4-week lead-in period all patients received peginterferon plus ribavirin. After the lead-in pe- riod boceprevir was added in the dosage of 800 mg three times a day orally.The subsequent treatment varied according to virologic response and fibrosis. During the therapy HCV RNA level was measured at week 4, 8, 12, 24 of the treatment for the assessment of virologic response profile. All patients who completed therapy were assessed at the end of the treatment and at the end of an additional 24-week treatment-free period for a sustained virologic response (SVR).

RESULTS

The total of 20 patients with advanced fibrosis was treated. Among patients with an undetectable HCV RNA level at week 8 the rate of SVR was 100%. No patient with decrease in the HCV RNA level < 1 log 10 IU/ml at treatment week 4 achieved SVR. The overall rate of SVR was 55%. The safety profile of the treatment regimen was good. Anemia was reported in 25% of patients. There was no life-threatening treatment adverse event.

CONCLUSION

Boceprevir in combination with P/R achieved fairly good SVR rates in patients that were"most difficult to treat"who failed on dual therapy and was effective among patients with cirrhosis.