1
|
Wang H, Yang J, Lee A, Phan J, Lim TY, Fuller CD, Han EY, Rhee DJ, Salzillo T, Zhao Y, Chopra N, Pham M, Castillo P, Sobremonte A, Moreno AC, Reddy JP, Rosenthal D, Garden AS, Wang X. MR-guided stereotactic radiation therapy for head and neck cancers. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 46:100760. [PMID: 38510980 PMCID: PMC10950743 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) has the advantage of utilizing high soft tissue contrast imaging to track daily changes in target and critical organs throughout the entire radiation treatment course. Head and neck (HN) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been increasingly used to treat localized lesions within a shorter timeframe. The purpose of this study is to examine the dosimetric difference between the step-and-shot intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans on Elekta Unity and our clinical volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans on Varian TrueBeam for HN SBRT. Method Fourteen patients treated on TrueBeam sTx with VMAT treatment plans were re-planned in the Monaco treatment planning system for Elekta Unity MR-Linac (MRL). The plan qualities, including target coverage, conformity, homogeneity, nearby critical organ doses, gradient index and low dose bath volume, were compared between VMAT and Monaco IMRT plans. Additionally, we evaluated the Unity adaptive plans of adapt-to-position (ATP) and adapt-to-shape (ATS) workflows using simulated setup errors for five patients and assessed the outcomes of our treated patients. Results Monaco IMRT plans achieved comparable results to VMAT plans in terms of target coverage, uniformity and homogeneity, with slightly higher target maximum and mean doses. The critical organ doses in Monaco IMRT plans all met clinical goals; however, the mean doses and low dose bath volumes were higher than in VMAT plans. The adaptive plans demonstrated that the ATP workflow may result in degraded target coverage and OAR doses for HN SBRT, while the ATS workflow can maintain the plan quality. Conclusion The use of Monaco treatment planning and online adaptation can achieve dosimetric results comparable to VMAT plans, with the additional benefits of real-time tracking of target volume and nearby critical structures. This offers the potential to treat aggressive and variable tumors in HN SBRT and improve local control and treatment toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- He Wang
- Department of Radiation Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jinzhong Yang
- Department of Radiation Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anna Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Tze Yee Lim
- Department of Radiation Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Clifton D. Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Eun Young Han
- Department of Radiation Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Dong Joo Rhee
- Department of Radiation Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Travis Salzillo
- Department of Radiation Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yao Zhao
- Department of Radiation Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nitish Chopra
- Department of Radiation Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mary Pham
- Department of Radiation Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Pam Castillo
- Department of Radiation Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Angela Sobremonte
- Department of Radiation Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amy C. Moreno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jay P. Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adam S. Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of Radiation Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Reddy JP, Liu S, Bathala T, Smith BD, Ramirez D, Shaitelman SF, Chun SG, Brewster AM, Barcenas CH, Ghia AJ, Ludmir EB, Patel AB, Shah SJ, Woodward WA, Gomez DR, Tang C. Addition of Metastasis-Directed Therapy to Standard of Care Systemic Therapy for Oligometastatic Breast Cancer (EXTEND): A Multicenter, Randomized Phase II Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:S136-S137. [PMID: 37784348 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Prior retrospective and prospective evidence have suggested a potential survival benefit of adding metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) to standard of care systemic therapy for oligometastatic breast cancer. This has led to the increased utilization of MDT in this setting despite the lack of randomized evidence to support this approach. Furthermore, the recent presentation of NRG-BR002 has questioned the value of MDT. Thus, we evaluated whether the addition of MDT to systemic therapy improves PFS in oligometastatic breast cancer. MATERIALS/METHODS EXTEND (NCT03599765) is a phase II randomized basket trial for multiple solid tumors testing whether the addition of MDT improves PFS. The primary endpoint was pre-specified to be independently assessed and reported for the breast basket when a minimum of 6 months of follow-up had been reached. Patients with ≤5 metastases were randomized to standard of care systemic therapy with or without MDT. The choice of systemic therapy was at the discretion of the treating medical oncologist. Number of metastatic lesions and prior lines of systemic therapy for metastatic disease were used as stratification variables pre-randomization. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) defined as time to randomization to date of clinical or radiographic progression or death. The study was designed to have 80% power to detect an improvement in median PFS from 18 to 36 months, with a type I error of 0.1. RESULTS Between September 2018 to July 2022, 43 patients were randomized. 22 patients were assigned to the MDT arm, and 21 patients to the no MDT arm. Three patients were not evaluable. The MDT arm patients were older vs the no-MDT arm patients (median 61.5 years vs 48 years, p = 0.01). Otherwise, the arms were well-balanced. Overall, 8 patients had triple negative disease (18.6%), and 12 patients (30%) had de novo metastatic disease. Of those patients with de novo presentation randomized to MDT, all except one had the primary tumor treated with surgery and radiation. At a median follow-up of 19.4 months, 20 events were observed. Among the 40 evaluable patients, there were 5 deaths (3 in the MDT arm and 2 in the no MDT arm). There was no difference in PFS between the MDT and no MDT arms (median 15.6 v 24.9 months, p = 0.66). Similarly, there was no difference in the secondary endpoint of time to new metastatic lesion appearance between the MDT and no MDT arms (median 15.6 months vs not reached, p = 0.09). Two grade 3 toxicities were observed in the MDT arm, and 1 in the no MDT arm. Further analysis of correlative translational biomarkers, including immune markers and ctDNA, are ongoing. CONCLUSION The addition of MDT to standard of care systemic therapy did not improve PFS or time to new metastatic lesion in patients with oligometastatic breast cancer. This data coupled with the recently presented NRG-BR002 results, suggests there is no benefit to MDT in an otherwise unselected oligometastatic breast cancer population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J P Reddy
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - S Liu
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - T Bathala
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - B D Smith
- Department of Breast Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - D Ramirez
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - S F Shaitelman
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - S G Chun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - A M Brewster
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - A J Ghia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - E B Ludmir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - A B Patel
- Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - S J Shah
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - W A Woodward
- Department of Breast Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - D R Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - C Tang
- Department of Genitourinary Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Salama V, Youssef S, Xu T, Wahid KA, Chen J, Rigert J, Lee A, Hutcheson KA, Gunn B, Phan J, Garden AS, Frank SJ, Morrison W, Reddy JP, Spiotto MT, Naser MA, Dede C, He R, Mohamed AS, van Dijk LV, Lin R, Roldan CJ, Rosenthal DI, Fuller CD, Moreno AC. Temporal characterization of acute pain and toxicity kinetics during radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. A retrospective study. Oral Oncol Rep 2023; 7:100092. [PMID: 38638130 PMCID: PMC11025722 DOI: 10.1016/j.oor.2023.100092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
Objectives Pain during Radiation Therapy (RT) for oral cavity/oropharyngeal cancer (OC/OPC) is a clinical challenge due to its multifactorial etiology and variable management. The objective of this study was to define complex pain profiles through temporal characterization of pain descriptors, physiologic state, and RT-induced toxicities for pain trajectories understanding. Materials and methods Using an electronic health record registry, 351 OC/OPC patients treated with RT from 2013 to 2021 were included. Weekly numeric scale pain scores, pain descriptors, vital signs, physician-reported toxicities, and analgesics were analyzed using linear mixed effect models and Spearman's correlation. Area under the pain curve (AUCpain) was calculated to measure pain burden over time. Results Median pain scores increased from 0 during the weekly visit (WSV)-1 to 5 during WSV-7. By WSV-7, 60% and 74% of patients reported mouth and throat pain, respectively, with a median pain score of 5. Soreness and burning pain peaked during WSV-6/7 (51%). Median AUCpain was 16% (IQR (9.3-23)), and AUCpain significantly varied based on gender, tumor site, surgery, drug use history, and pre-RT pain. A temporal increase in mucositis and dermatitis, declining mean bodyweight (-7.1%; P < 0.001) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) 6.8 mmHg; P < 0.001 were detected. Pulse rate was positively associated while weight and MAP were negatively associated with pain over time (P < 0.001). Conclusion This study provides insight on in-depth characterization and associations between dynamic pain, physiologic, and toxicity kinetics. Our findings support further needs of optimized pain control through temporal data-driven clinical decision support systems for acute pain management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivian Salama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sara Youssef
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Tianlin Xu
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kareem A. Wahid
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jaime Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jillian Rigert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anna Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Katherine A. Hutcheson
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Brandon Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adam S. Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven J. Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - William Morrison
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jay P. Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael T. Spiotto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mohamed A. Naser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Cem Dede
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Renjie He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Abdallah S.R. Mohamed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lisanne V. van Dijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, NL, USA
| | - Ruitao Lin
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Carlos J. Roldan
- Department of Pain Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care Medicine, and Pain Medicine, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David I. Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Clifton D. Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amy C. Moreno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tang C, Sherry AD, Haymaker C, Bathala T, Liu S, Fellman B, Cohen L, Aparicio A, Zurita AJ, Reuben A, Marmonti E, Chun SG, Reddy JP, Ghia A, McGuire S, Efstathiou E, Wang J, Wang J, Pilie P, Kovitz C, Du W, Simiele SJ, Kumar R, Borghero Y, Shi Z, Chapin B, Gomez D, Wistuba I, Corn PG. Addition of Metastasis-Directed Therapy to Intermittent Hormone Therapy for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: The EXTEND Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2023; 9:825-834. [PMID: 37022702 PMCID: PMC10080407 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.0161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
Importance Despite evidence demonstrating an overall survival benefit with up-front hormone therapy in addition to established synergy between hormone therapy and radiation, the addition of metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) to hormone therapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer, to date, has not been evaluated in a randomized clinical trial. Objective To determine in men with oligometastatic prostate cancer whether the addition of MDT to intermittent hormone therapy improves oncologic outcomes and preserves time with eugonadal testosterone compared with intermittent hormone therapy alone. Design, Setting, Participants The External Beam Radiation to Eliminate Nominal Metastatic Disease (EXTEND) trial is a phase 2, basket randomized clinical trial for multiple solid tumors testing the addition of MDT to standard-of-care systemic therapy. Men aged 18 years or older with oligometastatic prostate cancer who had 5 or fewer metastases and were treated with hormone therapy for 2 or more months were enrolled to the prostate intermittent hormone therapy basket at multicenter tertiary cancer centers from September 2018 to November 2020. The cutoff date for the primary analysis was January 7, 2022. Interventions Patients were randomized 1:1 to MDT, consisting of definitive radiation therapy to all sites of disease and intermittent hormone therapy (combined therapy arm; n = 43) or to hormone therapy only (n = 44). A planned break in hormone therapy occurred 6 months after enrollment, after which hormone therapy was withheld until progression. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was disease progression, defined as death or radiographic, clinical, or biochemical progression. A key predefined secondary end point was eugonadal progression-free survival (PFS), defined as the time from achieving a eugonadal testosterone level (≥150 ng/dL; to convert to nanomoles per liter, multiply by 0.0347) until progression. Exploratory measures included quality of life and systemic immune evaluation using flow cytometry and T-cell receptor sequencing. Results The study included 87 men (median age, 67 years [IQR, 63-72 years]). Median follow-up was 22.0 months (range, 11.6-39.2 months). Progression-free survival was improved in the combined therapy arm (median not reached) compared with the hormone therapy only arm (median, 15.8 months; 95% CI, 13.6-21.2 months) (hazard ratio, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.12-0.55; P < .001). Eugonadal PFS was also improved with MDT (median not reached) compared with the hormone therapy only (6.1 months; 95% CI, 3.7 months to not estimable) (hazard ratio, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.11-0.91; P = .03). Flow cytometry and T-cell receptor sequencing demonstrated increased markers of T-cell activation, proliferation, and clonal expansion limited to the combined therapy arm. Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial, PFS and eugonadal PFS were significantly improved with combination treatment compared with hormone treatment only in men with oligometastatic prostate cancer. Combination of MDT with intermittent hormone therapy may allow for excellent disease control while facilitating prolonged eugonadal testosterone intervals. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03599765.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chad Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Alexander D. Sherry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Cara Haymaker
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Tharakeswara Bathala
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Suyu Liu
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Bryan Fellman
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Lorenzo Cohen
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Ana Aparicio
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Amado J. Zurita
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Alexandre Reuben
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Enrica Marmonti
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Stephen G. Chun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Jay P. Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Amol Ghia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Sean McGuire
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Eleni Efstathiou
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Jennifer Wang
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Jianbo Wang
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Patrick Pilie
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Craig Kovitz
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Weiliang Du
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Samantha J. Simiele
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Rachit Kumar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, Arizona
| | - Yerko Borghero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, Arizona
| | - Zheng Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
| | - Brian Chapin
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Daniel Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ignacio Wistuba
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Paul G. Corn
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Reddy JP, Lei X, Bloom ES, Reed VK, Schlembach PJ, Arzu I, Mayo L, Chun SG, Ahmad NR, Stauder MC, Gopal R, Kaiser K, Fang P, Smith BD. Optimizing Preventive Adjuvant Linac-Based (OPAL) Radiation: A Phase 2 Trial of Daily Partial Breast Irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:629-644. [PMID: 36216274 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.09.083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Evidence supports use of partial-breast irradiation (PBI) in the management of early breast cancer, but the optimal dose-fractionation remains unsettled. METHODS AND MATERIALS We conducted a phase 2 clinical trial (OPAL trial) to evaluate a novel PBI dosing schedule of 35 Gy in 10 daily fractions. Patients with close (<2 mm) margins also received a boost of 9 Gy in 3 fractions. Eligible patients underwent margin-negative lumpectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ or estrogen receptor-positive invasive breast cancer, up to 3 cm, pTis-T2 N0. The primary outcome was any grade ≥2 toxic effect occurring from the start of radiation through 6 months of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported cosmesis, breast pain, and functional status, measured using the Breast Cancer Treatment Outcomes Scale, and physician-reported cosmesis, measured using the Radiation Therapy and Oncology Group scale. The Cochran-Armitage trend test and multivariable mixed-effects longitudinal growth curve models compared outcomes for the OPAL study population with those for a control group of similar patients treated with whole-breast irradiation (WBI) plus boost. RESULTS All 149 patients enrolled on the OPAL trial received the prescribed dose, and 17.4% received boost. The median age was 64 years; 83.2% were White, and 73.8% were overweight or obese. With median follow-up of 2.0 years, 1 patient (0.7%) experienced in-breast recurrence. Prevalence of the primary toxicity outcome was 17.4% (26 of 149 patients) in the OPAL trial compared with 72.7% (128 of 176 patients) in the control WBI-plus-boost cohort (P < .001). In longitudinal multivariable analysis, treatment on the OPAL trial was associated with improved patient-reported cosmesis (P < .001), functional status (P = .004), breast pain (P = .004), and physician-reported cosmesis (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Treatment with daily PBI was associated with substantial reduction in early toxicity and improved patient- and physician-reported outcomes compared with WBI plus boost. Daily external-beam partial-breast irradiation with 13 or fewer fractions merits further prospective evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jay P Reddy
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Xiudong Lei
- Departments of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Elizabeth S Bloom
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Valerie K Reed
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Pamela J Schlembach
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Isidora Arzu
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Lauren Mayo
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Stephen G Chun
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Neelofur R Ahmad
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael C Stauder
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ramesh Gopal
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Kels Kaiser
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Penny Fang
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Benjamin D Smith
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Departments of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sherry AD, Bathala TK, Liu S, Fellman BM, Chun SG, Jasani N, Guadagnolo BA, Jhingran A, Reddy JP, Corn PG, Shah AY, Kaiser KW, Ghia AJ, Gomez DR, Tang C. Definitive Local Consolidative Therapy for Oligometastatic Solid Tumors: Results From the Lead-in Phase of the Randomized Basket Trial EXTEND. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 114:910-918. [PMID: 35691448 PMCID: PMC11041161 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.05.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 05/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/07/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The benefit of local consolidative therapy (LCT) for oligometastasis across histologies remains uncertain. EXTernal beam radiation to Eliminate Nominal metastatic Disease (EXTEND; NCT03599765) is a randomized phase 2 basket trial evaluating the effectiveness of LCT for oligometastatic solid tumors. We report here the prospective results of the single-arm "lead-in" phase intended to identify histologies most likely to accrue to histology-specific endpoints in the randomized phase. METHODS AND MATERIALS Eligible histologies included colorectal, sarcoma, lung, head and neck, ovarian, renal, melanoma, pancreatic, prostate, cervix/uterine, breast, and hepatobiliary. Patients received LCT to all sites of active metastatic disease and primary/regional disease (as applicable) plus standard-of-care systemic therapy or observation. The primary endpoint in EXTEND was progression-free survival (PFS), and the primary endpoint of the lead-phase was histology-specific accrual feasibility. Adverse events were graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. RESULTS From August 2018 through January 2019, 50 patients were enrolled and 49 received definitive LCT. Prostate, breast, and kidney were the highest enrolling histologies and identified for independent accrual in the randomization phase. Most patients (73%) had 1 or 2 metastases, most often in lung or bone (79%), and received ablative radiation (62%). Median follow-up for censored patients was 38 months (range, 16-42 months). Median PFS was 13 months (95% confidence interval, 9-24), 3-year overall survival rate was 73% (95% confidence interval, 57%-83%), and local control rate was 98% (93 of 95 tumors). Two patients (4%) had Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 toxic effects related to LCT; no patient had grade 4 or 5 toxic effects. CONCLUSIONS The prospective lead-in phase of the EXTEND basket trial demonstrated feasible accrual, encouraging PFS, and low rates of severe toxic effects at mature follow-up. The randomized phase is ongoing with histology-based baskets that will provide histology-specific evidence for LCT in oligometastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander D Sherry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Tharakeswara K Bathala
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Suyu Liu
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Bryan M Fellman
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Stephen G Chun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Nikesh Jasani
- Department of General Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - B Ashleigh Guadagnolo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Anuja Jhingran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jay P Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Paul G Corn
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Amishi Y Shah
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Kelsey W Kaiser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Amol J Ghia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Daniel R Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Chad Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Barbon CEA, Peterson CB, Moreno AC, Lai SY, Reddy JP, Sahli A, Martino R, Johnson FM, Fuller CD, Hutcheson KA. Adhering to Eat and Exercise Status During Radiotherapy for Oropharyngeal Cancer for Prevention and Mitigation of Radiotherapy-Associated Dysphagia. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2022; 148:956-964. [PMID: 36074459 PMCID: PMC9459910 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.2313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Importance Previously published work reported independent benefit of maintenance of oral intake (eat) and swallowing exercise adherence (exercise) during radiotherapy (RT) on diet and functional outcomes. The current study seeks to validate the authors' previously published findings in a large contemporary cohort of patients with oropharynx cancer (OPC) and address limitations of the prior retrospective study using prospective, validated outcome measures. Objective To examine the longitudinal association of oral intake and swallowing exercise using validated, clinician-graded and patient-reported outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants Secondary analysis of a prospective OPC registry including patients who underwent primary RT/chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or primary transoral robotic surgery plus RT/CRT for OPC at a single-institution comprehensive cancer center. Exposures Adherence to speech pathology swallowing intervention during RT coded as (1) eat: oral intake at end of RT (nothing by mouth [NPO]; partial oral intake [PO], with feeding tube [FT] supplement; full PO); and (2) exercise: swallowing exercise adherence (nonadherent vs partial/full adherence). Main Outcomes and Measures Feeding tube and diet (Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer) patient-reported swallowing-related quality of life (MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory; MDADI) and clinician-graded dysphagia severity grade (videofluoroscopic Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity; DIGEST) were collected at baseline, 3 to 6 months, and 18 to 24 months post-RT. Results A total of 595 patients (mean [SD] age, 65 [10] years; 532 [89%] male) who underwent primary RT (111 of 595 [19%]), CRT (434 of 595 [73%]), or primary transoral robotic surgery plus RT/CRT (50 of 595 [8%]) were included in this cohort study. At the end of RT, 55 (9%) patients were NPO, 115 (19%) were partial PO, 425 (71%) were full PO, and 340 (57%) reported exercise adherence. After multivariate adjustment, subacute return to solid diet and FT were independently associated with oral intake (odds ratio [OR], 2.0; 95% CI, 1.0-4.1; OR, 0.1; 95% CI, 0.0-0.2, respectively) and exercise (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.9-4.5; OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1-0.5, respectively). Subacute MDADI (β = 6.5; 95% CI, 1.8-11.2), FT duration (days; β = -123.4; 95% CI, -148.5 to -98.4), and less severe dysphagia per DIGEST (OR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.3-1.0) were independently associated with oral intake, while exercise was independently associated with less severe laryngeal penetration/aspiration per DIGEST-safety (OR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.4-1.0). DIGEST grade associations with oral intake were not preserved long-term; however, exercise was associated with a higher likelihood of solid diet intake and better swallow safety per DIGEST. Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this cohort study extend the authors' previously published findings that oral intake and swallowing exercise during RT are associated with favorable functional outcomes, now demonstrated with broader domains of function using validated measures. Patterns of benefit differed in this study. Specifically, better subacute recovery of swallow-related quality of life and less severe dysphagia were found among patients who maintained oral intake independent of exercise adherence, and shorter FT utilization and better long-term diet and swallowing safety were found among those who exercised independent of oral intake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carly E. A. Barbon
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Christine B. Peterson
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
- Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Amy C. Moreno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Stephen Y. Lai
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
- Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Jay P. Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Ariana Sahli
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Rosemary Martino
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Faye M. Johnson
- Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Department of Thoracic–Head & Neck Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Clifton David Fuller
- Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Katherine A. Hutcheson
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Corrigan KL, Lei X, Ahmad N, Arzu I, Bloom E, Chun SG, Goodman C, Hoffman KE, Joyner M, Mayo L, Mitchell M, Nead KT, Perkins GH, Reed V, Reddy JP, Schlembach P, Shaitelman SF, Stauder MC, Strom EA, Tereffe W, Wiederhold L, Woodward WA, Smith BD. Adoption of Ultrahypofractionated Radiation Therapy in Patients With Breast Cancer. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:100877. [PMID: 35387420 PMCID: PMC8977907 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The first high-quality clinical trial to support ultrahypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (ultra-HF-WBI) for invasive early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) was published in April 2020, coinciding with the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. We analyzed adoption of ultra-HF-WBI for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and ESBC at our institution after primary trial publication. Methods and Materials We evaluated radiation fractionation prescriptions for all patients with DCIS or ESBC treated with WBI from March 2020 to May 2021 at our main campus and regional campuses. Demographic and clinical characteristics were extracted from the electronic medical record. Treating physician characteristics were collected from licensure data. Hierarchical logistic regression models identified factors correlated with adoption of ultra-HF-WBI (26 Gy in 5 daily factions [UK-FAST-FORWARD] or 28.5 Gy in 5 weekly fractions [UK-FAST]). Results Of 665 included patients, the median age was 61.5 years, and 478 patients (71.9%) had invasive, hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer. Twenty-one physicians treated the included patients. In total, 249 patients (37.4%) received ultra-HF-WBI, increasing from 4.3% (2 of 46) in March-April 2020 to a high of 45.5% (45 of 99) in July-August 2020 (P < .001). Patient factors associated with increased use of ultra-HF-WBI included older age (≥50 years old), low-grade WBI without inclusion of the low axilla, no radiation boost, and farther travel distance (P < .03). Physician variation accounted for 21.7% of variance in the outcome, with rate of use of ultra-HF-WBI by the treating physicians ranging from 0% to 75.6%. No measured physician characteristics were associated with use of ultra-HF-WBI. Conclusions Adoption of ultra-HF-WBI at our institution increased substantially after the publication of randomized evidence supporting its use. Ultra-HF-WBI was preferentially used in patients with lower risk disease, suggesting careful selection for this new approach while long-term data are maturing. Substantial physician-level variation may reflect a lack of consensus on the evidentiary standards required to change practice.
Collapse
|
9
|
Diao K, Nguyen TP, Moreno AC, Reddy JP, Garden AS, Wang CH, Tung S, Wang C, Wang XA, Rosenthal DI, Fuller CD, Gunn GB, Frank SJ, Morrison WH, Shah SJ, Lee A, Spiotto MT, Su SY, Ferrarotto R, Phan J. Stereotactic body ablative radiotherapy for reirradiation of small volume head and neck cancers is associated with prolonged survival: Large, single-institution, modern cohort study. Head Neck 2021; 43:3331-3344. [PMID: 34269492 PMCID: PMC8511054 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Revised: 06/18/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recurrent head and neck cancer has poor prognosis. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) may improve outcomes by delivering ablative radiation doses. METHODS We reviewed patients who received definitive-intent SBRT reirradiation at our institution from 2013 to 2020. Patterns of failure, overall survival (OS), and toxicities were analyzed. RESULTS One hundred and thirty-seven patients were evaluated. The median OS was 44.3 months. The median SBRT dose was 45 Gy and median target volume 16.9 cc. The 1-year local, regional, and distant control was 78%, 66%, and 83%, respectively. Systemic therapy improved regional (p = 0.004) and distant control (p = 0.04) in nonmetastatic patients. Grade 3+ toxicities were more common at mucosal sites (p = 0.001) and with concurrent systemic therapy (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS In a large cohort of SBRT reirradiation for recurrent, small volume head and neck cancers, a median OS of 44.3 months was observed. Systemic therapy improved regional and distant control. Toxicities were modulated by anatomic site and systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Diao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Theresa P. Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Amy C. Moreno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jay P. Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Adam S. Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Catherine H. Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Samuel Tung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Congjun Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Xin A. Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - David I. Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Clifton D. Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Gary B. Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Steven J. Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - William H. Morrison
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Shalin J. Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Anna Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Michael T. Spiotto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Shirley Y. Su
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Renata Ferrarotto
- Department of Thoracic Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hanania AN, Zhang X, Gunn GB, Rosenthal DI, Garden AS, Fuller CD, Phan J, Reddy JP, Moreno A, Chronowski G, Shah S, Ausat N, Hanna E, Ferrarotto R, Frank SJ. Proton Therapy for Major Salivary Gland Cancer: Clinical Outcomes. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:261-272. [PMID: 34285952 PMCID: PMC8270094 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00044.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To report clinical outcomes in terms of disease control and toxicity in patients with major salivary gland cancers (SGCs) treated with proton beam therapy. Materials and Methods Clinical and dosimetric characteristics of patients with SGCs treated from August 2011 to February 2020 on an observational, prospective, single-institution protocol were abstracted. Local control and overall survival were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. During radiation, weekly assessments of toxicity were obtained, and for patients with ≥ 90 days of follow-up, late toxicity was assessed. Results Seventy-two patients were identified. Median age was 54 years (range, 23-87 years). Sixty-three patients (88%) received postoperative therapy, and nine patients (12%) were treated definitively. Twenty-six patients (36%) received concurrent chemotherapy. Nine patients (12%) had received prior radiation. All (99%) but one patient received unilateral treatment with a median dose of 64 GyRBE (relative biological effectiveness) (interquartile range [IQR], 60-66), and 53 patients (74%) received intensity-modulated proton therapy with either single-field or multifield optimization. The median follow-up time was 30 months. Two-year local control and overall survival rates were 96% (95% confidence interval [CI] 85%-99%) and 89% (95% CI 76%-95%], respectively. Radiation dermatitis was the predominant grade-3 toxicity (seen in 21% [n = 15] of the patients), and grade ≥ 2 mucositis was rare (14%; n = 10 patients). No late-grade ≥ 3 toxicities were reported. Conclusion Proton beam therapy for treatment of major SGCs manifests in low rates of acute mucosal toxicity. In addition, the current data suggest a high rate of local control and minimal late toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander N Hanania
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xiaodong Zhang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - G Brandon Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adam S Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - C David Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jay P Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amy Moreno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gregory Chronowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shalin Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Noveen Ausat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ehab Hanna
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Renata Ferrarotto
- Department of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gunn GB, Garden AS, Ye R, Ausat N, Dahlstrom KR, Morrison WH, Fuller CD, Phan J, Reddy JP, Shah SJ, Mayo LL, Chun SG, Chronowski GM, Moreno AC, Myers JN, Hanna EY, Esmaeli B, Gillison ML, Ferrarotto R, Hutcheson KA, Chambers MS, Ginsberg LE, El-Naggar AK, Rosenthal DI, Zhu XR, Frank SJ. Proton Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer: A 12-Year, Single-Institution Experience. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:108-118. [PMID: 34285940 PMCID: PMC8270083 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00065.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To characterize our experience and the disease control and toxicity of proton therapy (PT) for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Clinical outcomes for patients with HNC treated with PT at our institution were prospectively collected in 2 institutional review board-approved prospective studies. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient characteristics and outcomes. Overall survival, local-regional control, and disease-free survival were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Treatment-related toxicities were recorded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.03) scale. RESULTS The cohort consisted of 573 patients treated from February 2006 to June 2018. Median patient age was 61 years. Oropharynx (33.3%; n = 191), paranasal sinus (11%; n = 63), and periorbital tissues (11%; n = 62) were the most common primary sites. Patients with T3/T4 or recurrent disease comprised 46% (n = 262) of the cohort. The intent of PT was definitive in 53% (n = 303), postoperative in 37% (n = 211), and reirradiation in 10% (n = 59). Median dose was 66 Gy (radiobiological equivalent). Regarding systemic therapy, 43% had received concurrent (n = 244), 3% induction (n = 19), and 15% (n = 86) had both. At a median follow-up of 2.4 years, 88 patients (15%) had died and 127 (22%) developed disease recurrence. The overall survival, local-regional control, and disease-free survival at 2 and 5 years were, respectively, 87% and 75%, 87% and 78%, and 74% and 63%. Maximum toxicity (acute or late) was grade 3 in 293 patients (51%), grade 2 in 234 patients (41%), and grade 1 in 31 patients (5%). There were 381 acute grade 3 and 190 late grade 3 unique toxicities across 212 (37%) and 150 (26%) patients, respectively. There were 3 late-grade 4 events across 2 patients (0.3%), 2 (0.3%) acute-grade 5, and no (0%) late-grade 5 events. CONCLUSIONS The overall results from this prospective study of our initial decade of experience with PT for HNC show favorable disease control and toxicity outcomes in a multidisease-site cohort and provide a reference benchmark for future comparison and study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G. Brandon Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adam S. Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rong Ye
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Noveen Ausat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kristina R. Dahlstrom
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - William H. Morrison
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - C. David Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jay P. Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shalin J. Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lauren L. Mayo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Stephen G. Chun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gregory M. Chronowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amy C. Moreno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffery N. Myers
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ehab Y. Hanna
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bita Esmaeli
- Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery, Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Maura L. Gillison
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Renata Ferrarotto
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Katherine A. Hutcheson
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mark S. Chambers
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lawrence E. Ginsberg
- Department of Neuroradiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adel K. El-Naggar
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David I. Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xiaorong Ronald Zhu
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven J. Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Smith GL, Fu S, Ning MS, Nguyen DK, Busse PM, Foote RL, Garden AS, Gunn GB, Fuller CD, Morrison WH, Chronowski GM, Shah SJ, Mayo LL, Phan J, Reddy JP, Snider JW, Patel SH, Katz SR, Lin A, Mohammed N, Dagan R, Lee NY, Rosenthal DI, Frank SJ. Work Outcomes after Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) versus Intensity-Modulated Photon Therapy (IMRT) for Oropharyngeal Cancer. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:319-327. [PMID: 34285958 PMCID: PMC8270077 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00067.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose We compared work outcomes in patients with oropharyngeal cancer (OPC), randomized to intensity-modulated proton (IMPT) versus intensity-modulated photon therapy (IMRT) for chemoradiation therapy (CRT). Patients and Methods In 147 patients with stage II-IVB squamous cell OPC participating in patient-reported outcomes assessments, a prespecified secondary aim of a randomized phase II/III trial of IMPT (n = 69) versus IMRT (n = 78), we compared absenteeism, presenteeism (i.e., the extent to which an employee is not fully functional at work), and work productivity losses. We used the work productivity and activity impairment questionnaire at baseline (pre-CRT), at the end of CRT, and at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. A one-sided Cochran-Armitage test was used to analyze within-arm temporal trends, and a χ2 test was used to compare between-arm differences. Among working patients, at each follow-up point, a 1-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare work-productivity scores. Results Patient characteristics in IMPT versus IMRT arms were similar. In the IMPT arm, within-arm analysis demonstrated that an increasing proportion of patients resumed working after IMPT, from 60% (40 of 67) pre-CRT and 71% (30 of 42) at 1 year to 78% (18 of 23) at 2 years (P = 0.025). In the IMRT arm, the proportion remained stable, with 57% (43 of 76) pre-CRT, 54% (21 of 39) at 1 year, and 52% (13 of 25) working at 2 years (P = 0.47). By 2 years after CRT, the between-arm difference between patients who had IMPT and those who had IMRT trended toward significance (P = 0.06). Regardless of treatment arm, among working patients, the most severe work impairments occurred from treatment initiation to the end of CRT, with significant recovery from absenteeism, presenteeism, and productivity impairments by the 2-year follow-up (P < 0.001 for all). Higher magnitudes of recovery from absenteeism (at 1 year, P = 0.05; and at 2 years, P = 0.04) and composite work impairment scores (at 1 year, P = 0.04; and at 2 years, P = 0.04) were seen in patients treated with IMPT versus those treated with IMRT. Conclusion In patients with OPC receiving curative CRT, patients randomized to IMPT demonstrated increasing work and productivity recovery trends. Studies are needed to identify mechanisms underlying head and neck CRT treatment causing work disability and impairment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace L Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shuangshuang Fu
- Department of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Matthew S Ning
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Diem-Khanh Nguyen
- University of California Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside, CA, USA
| | - Paul M Busse
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Robert L Foote
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Clinic School of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Adam S Garden
- Willis-Knighton Proton Therapy Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Gary B Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Clifton D Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - William H Morrison
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gregory M Chronowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shalin J Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lauren L Mayo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jay P Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - James W Snider
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Samir H Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Clinic School of Medicine and Science, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Sanford R Katz
- Willis-Knighton Proton Therapy Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Alexander Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Roi Dagan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bahig H, Fuller CD, Mitra A, Yoshida-Court K, Solley T, Ping Ng S, Abu-Gheida I, Elgohari B, Delgado A, Rosenthal DI, Garden AS, Frank SJ, Reddy JP, Colbert L, Klopp A. Longitudinal characterization of the tumoral microbiome during radiotherapy in HPV-associated oropharynx cancer. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2021; 26:98-103. [PMID: 33367119 PMCID: PMC7749292 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2020.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2020] [Revised: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe the baseline and serial tumor microbiome in HPV-associated oropharynx cancer (OPC) over the course of radiotherapy (RT). METHODS Patients with newly diagnosed HPV-associated OPC treated with definitive radiotherapy +/- concurrent chemotherapy were enrolled in this prospective study. Using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, dynamic changes in the tumor site microbiome during RT were investigated. Surface tumor samples were obtained before RT and at week 1, 3 and 5 of RT. Radiological primary tumor response at mid-treatment was categorized as complete (CR) or partial (PR). RESULTS Ten patients were enrolled, but 9 patients were included in the final analysis. Mean age was 62 years (range: 51-71). As per AJCC 8th Ed, 56%, 22% and 22% of patients had stage I, II and III, respectively. At 4-weeks, 6 patients had CR and 3 patients had PR; at follow-up imaging post treatment, all patients had CR. The baseline diversity of the tumoral versus buccal microbiome was not statistically different. For the entire cohort, alpha diversity was significantly decreased over the course of treatment (p = 0.04). There was a significant alteration in the bacterial community within the first week of radiation. Baseline tumor alpha diversity of patients with CR was significantly higher than those with PR (p = 0.03). While patients with CR had significant reduction in diversity over the course of radiation (p = 0.01), the diversity remained unchanged in patients with PR. Patients with history of smoking had significantly increased abundance of Kingella (0.05) and lower abundance of Stomatobaculum (p = 0.03) compared to never smokers. CONCLUSIONS The tumor microbiome of HPV-associated OPC exhibits reduced alpha diversity and altered taxa abundance over the course of radiotherapy. The baseline bacterial profiles of smokers vs. non-smokers were inherently different. Baseline tumor alpha diversity of patients with CR was higher than patients with PR, suggesting that the microbiome deserves further investigation as a biomarker of radiation response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Houda Bahig
- Radiation Oncology Department, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Clifton D. Fuller
- Radiation Oncology Department, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Aparna Mitra
- Radiation Oncology Department, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kyoko Yoshida-Court
- Radiation Oncology Department, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Travis Solley
- Radiation Oncology Department, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sweet Ping Ng
- Radiation Oncology Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ibrahim Abu-Gheida
- Radiation Oncology Department, Burjeel Medical City, Abu-Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Baher Elgohari
- Radiation Oncology Department, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine Department, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Andrea Delgado
- Radiation Oncology Department, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David I. Rosenthal
- Radiation Oncology Department, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adam S. Garden
- Radiation Oncology Department, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven J. Frank
- Radiation Oncology Department, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jay P. Reddy
- Radiation Oncology Department, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lauren Colbert
- Radiation Oncology Department, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ann Klopp
- Radiation Oncology Department, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Christopherson KM, Moreno AC, Elgohari B, Gross N, Ferrarotto R, Mohamed ASR, Brandon Gunn G, Goepfert RP, Mott FE, Shah SJ, David Fuller C, Reddy JP, Frank SJ, Morrison WH, Phan J, Rosenthal DI, Garden AS. Outcomes after salvage for HPV-positive recurrent oropharyngeal cancer treated with primary radiation. Oral Oncol 2020; 113:105125. [PMID: 33360375 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.105125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Revised: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) carries a favorable prognosis for patients, yet nearly 30% of patients will experience disease relapse. We sought to detail patterns of failure, associated salvage therapy, and outcomes for patients with recurrent HPV-positive OPSCC. METHODS AND MATERIALS This is a single institution retrospective study of patients with recurrent HPV-positive OPSCC irradiated from 2002 to 2014. The primary study outcome was overall survival (OS, calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method). Secondary aims included patterns of first failure with descriptive details of salvage therapy. Solitary recurrences were defined as initial presentation of recurrence in a single site (primary, neck or oligometastatic), and multi-site was defined as local and regional and/or multiple sites of distant recurrence. Survival outcomes were compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS The cohort consisted of 132 patients. The median follow-up was 59 months for surviving patients. Estimated 2-year and 5-year OS rates were 47% and 32%, respectively. Comparative 2-year and 5-year OS rates were 65% and 46% versus 19% and 9% for the solitary group and multi-site group, respectively (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS Patients with recurrent HPV-positive OPSCC experience 5-year survival of approximately 32%. However, patients with a "solitary" recurrence including disease at the primary site, neck or oligometastatic site have more favorable long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlin M Christopherson
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amy C Moreno
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Baher Elgohari
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Neil Gross
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Renata Ferrarotto
- Department of Thoracic and Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Abdallah Sherif Radwan Mohamed
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - G Brandon Gunn
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ryan P Goepfert
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Frank E Mott
- Department of Thoracic and Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shalin J Shah
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - C David Fuller
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jay P Reddy
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven J Frank
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - William H Morrison
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jack Phan
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adam S Garden
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wilke C, Takiar V, Wang H, Moreno AC, Tung SMS, Quinlan-Davidson SR, Garden AS, Rosenthal DI, Fuller CD, Gunn GB, Reddy JP, Morrison WH, Wang C, Zhao G, Hutcheson KA, Phan J. Defining the dose-volume criteria for laryngeal sparing in locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer utilizing split-field IMRT, whole-field IMRT and VMAT. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2020; 22:37-44. [PMID: 33277960 PMCID: PMC7856483 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2019] [Revised: 06/25/2019] [Accepted: 09/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the optimal dose-volume constraint for laryngeal sparing using three commonly employed intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) approaches in patients with oropharyngeal cancer treated to the bilateral neck. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty patients with stage II-IVA oropharynx cancers received definitive radiotherapy with split-field IMRT (SF-IMRT) to the bilateral neck between 2008 and 2013. Each case was re-planned using whole-field IMRT (WF-IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and plan quality metrics and dose to laryngeal structures was evaluated. Two larynx volumes were defined and compared on the current study: the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) larynx as defined per the RTOG 1016 protocol and the MDACC larynx defined as the components of the larynx bounded by the superior and inferior extent of the thyroid cartilage. RESULTS Target coverage, conformity, and heterogeneity indices were similar in all techniques. The RTOG larynx mean dose was lower with WF-IMRT than SF-IMRT (22.1 vs 25.8 Gy; P < 0.01). The MDACC larynx mean dose was 17.5 Gy ± 5.4 Gy with no differences between the 3 techniques. WF-IMRT and VMAT plans were associated with lower mean doses to the supraglottic larynx (42.1 vs 41.2 vs 54.8 Gy; P < 0.01) and esophagus (18.1 vs 18.2 vs 36 Gy; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Modern whole field techniques can provide effective laryngeal sparing in patients receiving radiotherapy to the bilateral neck for advanced oropharyngeal cancers. SUMMARY We evaluated laryngeal dose in patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer treated to the bilateral neck using split-field IMRT (SF-IMRT), whole-field IMRT (WF-IMRT) and volumetric arc therapy (VMAT). All three techniques provided good sparing of laryngeal structures and were able to achieve a mean larynx dose < 33 Gy. There were no significant differences in dose to target structures or non-laryngeal organs at risk among techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Wilke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vinita Takiar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - He Wang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amy C Moreno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shih-Ming Samuel Tung
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sean R Quinlan-Davidson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adam S Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Clifton D Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gary B Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jay P Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - William H Morrison
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Congjun Wang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - George Zhao
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Katherine A Hutcheson
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Stieb S, Mohamed ASR, He R, Zhu LL, McDonald BA, Wahid K, van Dijk LV, Ventura J, Ahmed S, McCoy L, Deshpande TS, Grant S, Reddy JP, Phan J, Garden AS, Rosenthal DI, Frank SJ, Gunn GB, Fuller CD. Development and validation of a contouring guideline for the taste bud bearing tongue mucosa. Radiother Oncol 2020; 157:63-69. [PMID: 33217499 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Revised: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To introduce a contouring guideline for the taste bud bearing tongue mucosa for head and neck cancer patients receiving radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS CT simulation images of oropharyngeal cancer patients were used to delineate both the whole tongue (extrinsic/intrinsic tongue muscles, floor of mouth) and the taste bud bearing tongue mucosa (method A: adaptation of the whole tongue structure; method B: axial adaptation of a mid-sagittal contour). Volumetric and dosimetric parameters of the whole tongue and the two methods of mucosal delineation, spatial overlap between methods A and B, and inter-observer variability for method B were calculated. RESULTS The study cohort was comprised of 70 patients with T1-4 N0-1 tonsillar (83%) and base of tongue (17%) cancers. Most of the comparative parameters between the whole tongue and mucosa (method A) significantly differed (mean, minimum, and maximum dose, V5-V70, D40-D90). The mean dose calculated for the whole tongue deviated on average 3.77 Gy compared to method A. No significant differences were found between methods A and B of the taste bud bearing tongue mucosa structure, and none of the dosimetric parameters differed more than 1.03 Gy on average. The mean Dice similarity coefficient for both mucosal structures was 0.79 ± 0.05, and 0.63 ± 0.12 for the inter-observer analysis of method B. CONCLUSIONS We defined two methods for delineating the taste bud bearing mucosa and both are equally satisfactory procedures. Either method is preferable over delineation of the whole tongue as organ at risk for taste impairment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Stieb
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States.
| | - Abdallah S R Mohamed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Renjie He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Lin L Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Brigid A McDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Kareem Wahid
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Lisanne V van Dijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Juan Ventura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Sara Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Lance McCoy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Tanaya S Deshpande
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Stephen Grant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Jay P Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Adam S Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - G Brandon Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - C David Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bagley AF, Garden AS, Reddy JP, Moreno AC, Frank SJ, Rosenthal DI, Morrison WH, Gunn GB, Fuller CD, Shah SJ, Ferrarotto R, Sturgis EM, Gross ND, Phan J. Highly conformal reirradiation in patients with prior oropharyngeal radiation: Clinical efficacy and toxicity outcomes. Head Neck 2020; 42:3326-3335. [PMID: 32776401 PMCID: PMC7722120 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Revised: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 06/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reirradiation of head and neck cancer is associated with high rates of locoregional failure and potentially severe treatment-related toxicity. We report our institutional experience of reirradiation using modern highly conformal radiotherapy approaches in patients with prior oropharyngeal radiation. METHODS We reviewed patients receiving curative-intent reirradiation with intensity-modulated radiation therapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy, and proton beam radiotherapy at our institution from 1999 to 2019. Disease control, survival, and toxicity rates following reirradiation were determined. RESULTS Sixty-nine patients were evaluated. Local control (LC), progression-free survival, and overall survival at 2 years following reirradiation were 77%, 35%, and 51%, respectively. Grade 3 or greater (G3+) late toxicities occurred in 46% of patients and 41% required feeding tube placement during or after reirradiation. CONCLUSIONS In select patients with prior oropharyngeal radiation, highly conformal reirradiation offers acceptable LC, but G3+ toxicity and out-of-field failure rates remain high. These findings warrant continued evaluation of new multimodality approaches to improve oncologic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander F. Bagley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Adam S. Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Jay P. Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Amy C. Moreno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Steven J. Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - David I. Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - William H. Morrison
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - G. Brandon Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Clifton D. Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Shalin J. Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Renata Ferrarotto
- Department of Thoracic/Head & Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Erich M. Sturgis
- Department of Head & Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Neil D. Gross
- Department of Head & Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Chapman BV, Lei X, Patil P, Tripathi S, Nicklaus KM, Grossberg AJ, Shaitelman SF, Thompson AM, Hunt KK, Buchholz TA, Merchant F, Markey MK, Smith BD, Reddy JP. Quantitative 3-Dimensional Photographic Assessment of Breast Cosmesis After Whole Breast Irradiation for Early Stage Breast Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. Adv Radiat Oncol 2020; 5:824-833. [PMID: 33083644 PMCID: PMC7557136 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.04.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2020] [Revised: 04/14/2020] [Accepted: 04/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Our purpose was to use 3-dimensional (3D) surface photography to quantitatively measure breast cosmesis within the framework of a randomized clinical trial of conventionally fractionated (CF) and hypofractionated (HF) whole breast irradiation (WBI); to identify how 3D measurements are associated with patient- and physician-reported cosmesis; and to determine whether objective measures of breast symmetry varied by WBI treatment arm or transforming growth factor β 1 (TGFβ1) status. Methods and Materials From 2011 to 2014, 287 women age ≥40 with ductal carcinoma in situ or early-stage invasive breast cancer were enrolled in a multicenter trial and randomized to HF-WBI or CF-WBI with a boost. Three-dimensional surface photography was performed at 3 years posttreatment. Patient-reported cosmetic outcomes were recorded with the Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale. Physician-reported cosmetic outcomes were assessed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scale. Volume ratios and 6 quantitative measures of breast symmetry, termed F1-6C, were calculated using the breast contour and fiducial points assessed on 3D surface images. Associations between all metrics, patient- and physician-reported cosmesis, treatment arm, and TGFβ1 genotype were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and multivariable logistic regression models. Results Among 77 (39 CF-WBI and 38 HF-WBI) evaluable patients, both patient- and physician-reported cosmetic outcomes were significantly associated with the F1C vertical symmetry measure (both P < .05). Higher dichotomized F1C and volumetric symmetry measures were associated with improved patient- and physician-reported cosmesis on multivariable logistic regression (both P ≤ .05). There were no statistically significant differences in vertical symmetry or volume measures between treatment arms. Increased F6C horizontal symmetry was observed in the CF-WBI arm (P = .05). Patients with the TGFβ1 C-509T variant allele had lower F2C vertical symmetry measures (P = .02). Conclusions Quantitative 3D image-derived measures revealed comparable cosmetic outcomes with HF-WBI compared with CF-WBI. Our findings suggest that 3D surface imaging may be a more sensitive method for measuring subtle cosmetic changes than global patient- or physician-reported assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bhavana V. Chapman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Xiudong Lei
- Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Prithvi Patil
- Department of Engineering Technology, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Shikha Tripathi
- Department of Engineering Technology, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Krista M. Nicklaus
- Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
| | - Aaron J. Grossberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Simona F. Shaitelman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Alastair M. Thompson
- Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Kelly K. Hunt
- Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Thomas A. Buchholz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
- Scripps MD Anderson Cancer Center, La Jolla, California
| | - Fatima Merchant
- Department of Engineering Technology, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
- Department of Computer Science, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Mia K. Markey
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
- Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Benjamin D. Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
- Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jay P. Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
- Corresponding author: Jay P. Reddy, MD, PhD
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Mesko S, Wang H, Tung S, Wang C, Pasalic D, Ning MS, Pezzi TA, Moreno AC, Reddy JP, Garden AS, Rosenthal DI, Gunn GB, Frank SJ, Fuller CD, Morrison W, Su SY, Hanna E, Phan J. SABR for Skull Base Malignancies: A Systematic Analysis of Set-Up and Positioning Accuracy. Pract Radiat Oncol 2020; 10:363-371. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2020.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2019] [Revised: 01/10/2020] [Accepted: 02/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
20
|
Stieb S, Perez-Martinez I, Mohamed AS, Rock S, Bajaj N, Deshpande TS, Zaid M, Garden AS, Goepfert RP, Cardoso R, Ferrarotto R, Reddy JP, Phan J, Morrison WH, Rosenthal DI, Koay EJ, Frank SJ, Fuller CD, Gunn GB. The impact of tongue-deviating and tongue-depressing oral stents on long-term radiation-associated symptoms in oropharyngeal cancer survivors. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2020; 24:71-78. [PMID: 32642562 PMCID: PMC7334797 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2020.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2020] [Revised: 05/27/2020] [Accepted: 05/29/2020] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate whether the use of oral stents during intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) is associated with long-term patient reported symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data was obtained from a prospective observational study of disease-free head and neck cancer survivors. Radiation-associated patient reported symptoms were assessed using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory Head and Neck module (MDASI-HN). Scores of ≥5 (11-point Likert scale, 0-10) were considered moderate/severe. Stratification was performed regarding IMRT volume (uni- versus bilateral neck) and stent utilization, with non-parametric analyses between groups. RESULTS 462 OPC survivors formed the cohort (54% tonsil, 46% base of tongue primaries). A tongue-deviating stent was used in 17%, tongue-depressing stent in 46%, and no stent in 37%. Median prescribed dose to the high dose clinical target volume was 66.0 Gy. Median follow-up from RT to MDASI-HN assessment was 68 months. Twenty percent had received unilateral neck RT (all had tonsil primaries), in whom a significant improvement in the proportion of patients with moderate/severe taste impairment (2% vs. 15%, p = 0.047) and lack of appetite (0% vs. 9%, p = 0.019) was associated with the use of tongue-deviating stents compared to no oral stent. In those who had received bilateral neck RT, a significant improvement in the proportion of patients with moderate/severe difficulty swallowing/chewing was associated with use of a tongue-depressing stent (21% vs. 31% without oral stent, p = 0.013). CONCLUSION Disease-site specific select use of oral stents during IMRT was associated with reduced long-term patient reported symptoms in OPC survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Stieb
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Ismael Perez-Martinez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Abdallah S.R. Mohamed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Stockton Rock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Nimit Bajaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Tanaya S. Deshpande
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Mohamed Zaid
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Adam S. Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Ryan P. Goepfert
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Richard Cardoso
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Renata Ferrarotto
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jay P. Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - William H. Morrison
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - David I. Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Eugene J. Koay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Steven J. Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - C. David Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - G. Brandon Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - MD Anderson Head and Neck Cancer Symptom Working Group
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Grant SR, Williamson TD, Stieb S, Shah SJ, David Fuller C, Rosenthal DI, Frank SJ, Garden AS, Morrison WH, Phan J, Moreno AC, Reddy JP, Cardoso RC, Liu AY, Wu RY, Gunn GB. A Dosimetric Comparison of Oral Cavity Sparing in the Unilateral Treatment of Early Stage Tonsil Cancer: IMRT, IMPT, and Tongue-Deviating Oral Stents. Adv Radiat Oncol 2020; 5:1359-1363. [PMID: 33305099 PMCID: PMC7718552 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Revised: 08/11/2020] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Tongue-deviating oral stents (TDOS) are commonly used during unilateral neck radiation therapy to reduce unnecessary dose to nontarget oral structures. Their benefit in the setting of highly conformal treatment techniques, however, is not defined. The goal of this study was to investigate the potential benefit of TDOS use on dosimetric parameters in unilateral intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Methods A total of 16 patients with T1-2 tonsil cancer treated at a single institution were selected, of which 8 were simulated/treated with a TDOS and 8 without a TDOS. All received definitive unilateral IMRT to a dose of 66 Gy in 30 fx. IMPT plans were generated for each patient for study purposes and optimized according to standard institutional practice. Results For IMRT plans, the presence of a TDOS (vs without) was associated with a significantly lower oral mucosa mean dose (31.4 vs 35.3 Gy; P = .020) and V30 (42.7% vs 57.1%; P = .025). For IMPT plans, the presence of TDOS (vs without) was not associated with any improvement in oral mucosa mean dose (18.3 vs 19.9 Gy; P = .274) or V30 (25.0% vs 26.2%; P = .655). IMPT plans without TDOS compared with IMRT plans with TDOS demonstrated reduced oral mucosa mean dose (P < .001) and V30 (P < .001). Conclusion The use of a TDOS for the unilateral treatment of well-lateralized tonsil cancers was associated with oral mucosa sparing for IMRT, but not for IMPT. Moreover, mucosa sparing was improved for IMPT plans without a TDOS compared to IMRT plans with a TDOS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen R Grant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Tyler D Williamson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sonja Stieb
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Shalin J Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - C David Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Adam S Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - William H Morrison
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Amy C Moreno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jay P Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Richard C Cardoso
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Amy Y Liu
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Richard Y Wu
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - G Brandon Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Pasalic D, Ludmir EB, Allen PK, Thaker NG, Chapman BV, Hanna EY, Su SY, Ferrarotto R, Glisson BS, Reddy JP, Brandon Gunn G, Fuller CD, Phan J, Rosenthal DI, Morrison WH, Garden AS, Frank SJ. Patient-reported outcomes, physician-reported toxicities, and treatment outcomes in a modern cohort of patients with sinonasal cancer treated using proton beam therapy. Radiother Oncol 2020; 148:258-266. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Revised: 04/20/2020] [Accepted: 05/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
|
23
|
Grant SR, Hutcheson KA, Ye R, Garden AS, Morrison WH, Rosenthal DI, Gunn GB, Fuller C, Phan J, Reddy JP, Moreno AC, Lewin JS, Sturgis EM, Ferrarotto R, Frank SJ. Prospective longitudinal patient-reported outcomes of swallowing following intensity modulated proton therapy for oropharyngeal cancer. Radiother Oncol 2020; 148:133-139. [PMID: 32361662 PMCID: PMC9815953 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.04.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2020] [Revised: 04/14/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE With an enlarging population of long-term oropharyngeal cancer survivors, dysphagia is an increasingly important toxicity following oropharynx cancer treatment. While lower doses to normal surrounding structures may be achieved with intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) compared to photon-based radiation, the clinical benefit is uncertain. METHODS AND MATERIALS Seventy-one patients with stage III/IV oropharyngeal cancer (AJCC 7th edition) undergoing definitive IMPT on a longitudinal prospective cohort study who had completed the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) at pre-specified time points were included. RESULTS The majority of patients had HPV-positive tumors (85.9%) and received bilateral neck radiation (81.4%) with concurrent systemic therapy (61.8%). Mean composite MDADI scores decreased from 88.2 at baseline to 59.6 at treatment week 6, and then increased to 74.4 by follow up week 10, 77.0 by 6 months follow up, 80.5 by 12 months follow up, and 80.1 by 24 months follow up. At baseline, only 5.6% of patients recording a poor composite score (lower than 60), compared to 61.2% at treatment week 6, 19.1% at follow up week 10, 13.0% at 6 months follow up, 13.5% at 1 year follow up, and 11.1% at 2 years follow up. CONCLUSIONS Patient reported outcomes following IMPT for oropharyngeal cancer demonstrates decreased swallowing function at completion of treatment with relatively rapid recovery by 10 weeks follow up and steady improvement through 2 years. The results are comparable to similar longitudinal studies of photon-based radiotherapy for oropharynx cancer, and suggest that IMPT confers no additional excess toxicity related to swallowing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen R. Grant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Katherine A. Hutcheson
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rong Ye
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adam S. Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - William H. Morrison
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David I. Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - G. Brandon Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - C.D. Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jay P. Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amy C. Moreno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jan S. Lewin
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Erich M. Sturgis
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Renata Ferrarotto
- Department of Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Stieb S, Mohamed ASR, Deshpande TS, Harp J, Greiner B, Garden AS, Goepfert RP, Cardoso R, Ferrarotto R, Phan J, Reddy JP, Morrison WH, Rosenthal DI, Frank SJ, Fuller CD, Brandon Gunn G. Prospective observational evaluation of radiation-induced late taste impairment kinetics in oropharyngeal cancer patients: Potential for improvement over time? Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2020; 22:98-105. [PMID: 32373720 PMCID: PMC7191583 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2020.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2020] [Accepted: 03/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
The majority of OPC patients are affected from late taste impairment after RT. Taste markedly improved in the first years from end of RT, but plateaued after year 5. Treatment site, CTV1 dose and age might have an influence on taste impairment.
Background and purpose Taste impairment is a common radiation-induced toxicity in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients acutely. However, data on the potential for recovery and the time dependent course of late taste impairment are limited. Materials and methods As part of an IRB-approved observational prospective study, HNC patients underwent serial surveys including the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory - Head and Neck module (MDASI-HN). For our analysis, we extracted MDASI-HN taste item results from oropharyngeal cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy or volumetric modulated arc therapy and at least two taste assessments after ≥1 year from end of radiotherapy (RT). Results 1214 MDASI taste items from 326 patients between 1 and 13 years post-RT were included. Median prescribed dose to the high-dose clinical target volume (CTV1) was 66.0 Gy, with 180 patients (55%) receiving chemotherapy. Taste markedly improved in the first years from end of RT, but plateaued after year 5. In patients with taste assessment in subsequent years, a significant reduction in taste impairment was found from the second to the third year (p = 0.001) and tended towards significance from the third to the fourth year (p = 0.058). Multivariate analysis revealed treatment site as significant factor in the sixth year from RT and CTV1 dose and age in the seventh year. Conclusion Radiation-induced taste impairment may improve over an extended time interval, but becomes relatively stable from year 5 post-RT. Direct characterization of RT-induced taste impairment and the calculation of normal tissue complication probability should include consideration of the time-dependent course in taste recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Stieb
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, United States
| | - Abdallah S R Mohamed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, United States
| | - Tanaya S Deshpande
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, United States
| | - Jared Harp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, United States
| | - Benjamin Greiner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, United States
| | - Adam S Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, United States
| | - Ryan P Goepfert
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, United States
| | - Richard Cardoso
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, United States
| | - Renata Ferrarotto
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, United States
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, United States
| | - Jay P Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, United States
| | - William H Morrison
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, United States
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, United States
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, United States
| | - C David Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, United States
| | - G Brandon Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ng SP, Cardenas CE, Elhalawani H, Pollard C, Elgohari B, Fang P, Meheissen M, Guha-Thakurta N, Bahig H, Johnson JM, Kamal M, Garden AS, Reddy JP, Su SY, Ferrarotto R, Frank SJ, Brandon Gunn G, Moreno AC, Rosenthal DI, Fuller CD, Phan J. Comparison of tumor delineation using dual energy computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging in head and neck cancer re-irradiation cases. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2020; 14:1-5. [PMID: 33458306 PMCID: PMC7807720 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2020.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2020] [Revised: 04/16/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
GTVs on the 60 kV and 140 kV from DECT, and the T1c and T2 from MRI were compared. Delineation was the most consistent using T1c (no interobserver difference in DSC). T1c MRI provided higher interobserver agreement for skull base tumors. 60 kV DECT provided higher interobserver agreement for non-skull base tumors.
In treatment planning, multiple imaging modalities can be employed to improve the accuracy of tumor delineation but this can be costly. This study aimed to compare the interobserver consistency of using dual energy computed tomography (DECT) versus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for delineating tumors in the head and neck cancer (HNC) re-irradiation scenario. Twenty-three patients with recurrent HNC and had planning DECT and MRI were identified. Contoured tumor volumes by seven radiation oncologists were compared. Overall, T1c MRI performed the best with median DSC of 0.58 (0–0.91) for T1c. T1c MRI provided higher interobserver agreement for skull base sites and 60 kV DECT provided higher interobserver agreement for non-skull base sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sweet Ping Ng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Carlos E Cardenas
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hesham Elhalawani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Courtney Pollard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Baher Elgohari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Penny Fang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mohamed Meheissen
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Nandita Guha-Thakurta
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Houda Bahig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jason M Johnson
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mona Kamal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adam S Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jay P Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shirley Y Su
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Renata Ferrarotto
- Department of Thoracic Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - G Brandon Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amy C Moreno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Clifton D Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Mesko S, Wang H, Tung S, Wang C, Pasalic D, Chapman BV, Moreno AC, Reddy JP, Garden AS, Rosenthal DI, Gunn GB, Frank SJ, Fuller CD, Morrison W, Phan J. Estimating PTV Margins in Head and Neck Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy (SABR) Through Target Site Analysis of Positioning and Intrafractional Accuracy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 106:185-193. [PMID: 31580928 PMCID: PMC7307590 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2019] [Revised: 09/11/2019] [Accepted: 09/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Recurrent or previously irradiated head and neck cancers (HNC) are therapeutically challenging and may benefit from high-dose, highly accurate radiation techniques, such as stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR). Here, we compare set-up and positioning accuracy across HNC subsites to further optimize the treatment process and planning target volume (PTV) margin recommendations for head and neck SABR. METHODS AND MATERIALS We prospectively collected data on 405 treatment fractions across 79 patients treated with SABR for recurrent/previously irradiated HNC. First, interfractional error was determined by comparing ExacTrac x-ray to the treatment plan. Patients were then shifted and residual error was measured with repeat x-ray. Next, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was compared with ExacTrac for positioning agreement, and final shifts were applied. Lastly, intrafractional error was measured with x-ray before each arc. Results were stratified by treatment site into skull base, neck/parotid, and mucosal. RESULTS Most patients (66.7%) were treated to 45 Gy in 5 fractions (range, 21-47.5 Gy in 3-5 fractions). The initial mean ± standard deviation interfractional errors were -0.2 ± 1.4 mm (anteroposterior), 0.2 ± 1.8 mm (craniocaudal), and -0.1 ± 1.7 mm (left-right). Interfractional 3-dimensional vector error was 2.48 ± 1.44, with skull base significantly lower than other sites (2.22 vs 2.77; P = .0016). All interfractional errors were corrected to within 1.3 mm and 1.8°. CBCT agreed with ExacTrac to within 3.6 mm and 3.4°. CBCT disagreements and intrafractional errors of >1 mm or >1° occurred at significantly lower rates in skull base sites (CBCT: 16.4% vs 50.0% neck, 52.0% mucosal, P < .0001; intrafractional: 22.0% vs 48.7% all others, P < .0001). Final PTVs were 1.5 mm (skull base), 2.0 mm (neck/parotid), and 1.8 mm (mucosal). CONCLUSIONS Head and neck SABR PTV margins should be optimized by target site. PTV margins of 1.5 to 2 mm may be sufficient in the skull base, whereas 2 to 2.5 mm may be necessary for neck and mucosal targets. When using ExacTrac, skull base sites show significantly fewer uncertainties throughout the treatment process, but neck/mucosal targets may require the addition of CBCT to account for positioning errors and internal organ motion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shane Mesko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - He Wang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Samuel Tung
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Congjun Wang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Dario Pasalic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Bhavana V Chapman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Amy C Moreno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jay P Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Adam S Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - G Brandon Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Clifton D Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - William Morrison
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Bahig H, Ng SP, Pollard C, Nguyen TP, Gunn GB, Rosenthal DI, Fuller CD, Frank SJ, Garden AS, Reddy JP, Morrison WH, Ferrarotto R, Hanna EY, DeMonte F, Su SY, Phan J. A prospective evaluation of health‐related quality of life after skull base re‐irradiation. Head Neck 2019; 42:485-497. [DOI: 10.1002/hed.26037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2019] [Revised: 11/05/2019] [Accepted: 11/13/2019] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Houda Bahig
- Department of Radiation OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas
| | - Sweet P. Ng
- Department of Radiation OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas
| | - Courtney Pollard
- Department of Radiation OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas
| | - Theresa P. Nguyen
- Department of Radiation OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas
| | - Gary B. Gunn
- Department of Radiation OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas
| | - David I. Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas
| | - Clifton D. Fuller
- Department of Radiation OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas
| | - Steven J. Frank
- Department of Radiation OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas
| | - Adam S. Garden
- Department of Radiation OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas
| | - Jay P. Reddy
- Department of Radiation OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas
| | - William H. Morrison
- Department of Radiation OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas
| | - Renata Ferrarotto
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas
| | - Ehab Y. Hanna
- Department of Head and Neck SurgeryThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas
| | - Franco DeMonte
- Department of NeurosurgeryThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas
| | - Shirley Y. Su
- Department of Head and Neck SurgeryThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Pasalic D, Reddy JP, Edwards T, Pan HY, Smith BD. Implementing an Electronic Data Capture System to Improve Clinical Workflow in a Large Academic Radiation Oncology Practice. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2019; 2:1-12. [PMID: 30652599 DOI: 10.1200/cci.18.00034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe the feasibility and benefits of implementing a custom radiation oncology electronic data capture (EDC) system in a large academic radiation oncology practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS A Web-based point-and-click EDC known as Brocade was internally developed and implemented systemwide in 2016. Brocade captures key data elements, such as stage, histology, and patient and treatment characteristics; links this information to radiation dose data extracted from the record and verify system; and creates clinical notes that are automatically exported to the hospital electronic health record. We report the number of unique radiation episodes captured by Brocade in its first full year of implementation and describe the notes generated, toxicities captured, compliance with staging and quality assurance, and time of day in which documentation occurred with Brocade versus our prior human transcription system. RESULTS A median of 756 radiation episodes per month was captured for a total of 9,283 unique episodes captured in the first full year of implementation. The most common notes were for on-treatment visits (29,913) and simulations (13,220). Stage was captured for 92.2% of Brocade episodes (8,513 of 9,236) versus 29.7% of courses pre-Brocade (3,025 of 10,170; P < .001). Quality assurance was documented for 96.3% of completed courses (7,601 of 7,892). The most common grade ≥1 toxicities were pain (10,031), fatigue (7,490), and dermatitis (6,172). Brocade implementation was associated with a reduction in off-hours documentation and increase in the proportion of documentation created between 8:00 am and 12:00 pm. CONCLUSION Brocade is a reliable Web-based EDC tool that improves clinical documentation without detracting from clinical workflow. Moreover, Brocade has the advantage of capturing data in a structured manner that facilitates real-time analytics and outcome reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dario Pasalic
- All authors: The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jay P Reddy
- All authors: The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Timothy Edwards
- All authors: The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Hubert Y Pan
- All authors: The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Benjamin D Smith
- All authors: The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ng SP, Wang H, Pollard C, Nguyen T, Bahig H, Fuller CD, Gunn GB, Garden AS, Reddy JP, Morrison WH, Shah S, Rosenthal DI, Frank SJ, Guha-Thakurta N, Ferrarotto R, Hanna EY, Su SY, Phan J. Patient Outcomes after Reirradiation of Small Skull Base Tumors using Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy, Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy, or Proton Therapy. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2019; 81:638-644. [PMID: 33381367 DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1694052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2019] [Accepted: 06/11/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of patients who received reirradiation for small skull base tumors utilizing either intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), and proton radiotherapy (PRT). Methods Patients who received IMRT, SBRT or PRT reirradiation for recurrent or new small skull base tumors (< 60 cc) between April 2000 and July 2016 were identified. Those with < 3 months follow-up were excluded. Clinical outcomes and treatment toxicity were assessed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the local control (LC), regional control (RC), distant control (DC), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results Of the 75 patients eligible, 30 (40%) received SBRT, 30 (40%) received IMRT, and 15 (20%) received PRT. The median retreatment volume was 28 cc. The median reirradiation dose was 66 Gy in 33 fractions for IMRT/PRT, and 45 Gy in 5 fractions for SBRT. The median time to reirradiation was 41 months. With a median follow-up of 24 months, the LC, RC, DC, PFS, and OS rates were 84%, 79%, 82%, 60%, and 87% at 1 year, and 75%, 72%, 80%, 49%, and 74% at 2 years. There was no difference in OS between radiation modalities. The 1- and 2-year late Grade 3 toxicity rates were 3% and 11% respectively.. Conclusions Reirradiation of small skull base tumors utilizing IMRT, PRT, or SBRT provided good local tumor control and low rates of Grade 3 late toxicity. A prospective clinical trial is needed to guide selection of radiation treatment modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sweet Ping Ng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, Unites States.,Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - He Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, Unites States
| | - Courtney Pollard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, Unites States
| | - Theresa Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, Unites States
| | - Houda Bahig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, Unites States
| | - Clifton D Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, Unites States
| | - G Brandon Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, Unites States
| | - Adam S Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, Unites States
| | - Jay P Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, Unites States
| | - William H Morrison
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, Unites States
| | - Shalin Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, Unites States
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, Unites States
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, Unites States
| | - Nandita Guha-Thakurta
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, Unites States
| | - Renata Ferrarotto
- Department of Thoracic Head and Neck Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, Unites States
| | - Ehab Y Hanna
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, Unites States
| | - Shirley Y Su
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, Unites States
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, Unites States
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Moreno AC, Wilke C, Wang H, Tung SMS, Pollard C, Garden AS, Morrison WH, Rosenthal DI, Fuller CD, Gunn GB, Reddy JP, Shah SJ, Frank SJ, Takiar V, Phan J. Optimizing laryngeal sparing with intensity modulated radiotherapy or volumetric modulated arc therapy for unilateral tonsil cancer. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2019; 10:29-34. [PMID: 33458265 PMCID: PMC7807534 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2019.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2018] [Revised: 04/01/2019] [Accepted: 04/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Early stage tonsillar cancers may be treated with unilateral neck radiotherapy (RT). We performed a dosimetric study comparing three common radiotherapy modalities. No significant differences in target coverage existed between all plans. Laryngeal doses were reduced using whole-field intensity modulated RT and VMAT. Shorter treatment times and required monitor units were also associated with VMAT.
Background and purpose Minimizing radiation dose exposure to nearby organs is key to limiting clinical toxicities associated with radiotherapy. Several treatment modalities such as split- or whole-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SF-IMRT, WF-IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) are being used to treat tonsillar cancer patients with unilateral neck radiotherapy. Herein, we provide a modern dosimetric comparison of all three techniques. Materials and methods Forty patients with tonsillar cancer treated with definitive, ipsilateral neck SF-IMRT were evaluated. Each patient was re-planned with WF-IMRT and VMAT techniques, and doses to selected organs-at-risk (OARs) including the larynx, esophagus, and brainstem were compared. Results No significant differences in target coverage existed between plans; however, the heterogeneity index improved using WF-IMRT and VMAT relative to SF-IMRT. Compared to SF-IMRT, WF-IMRT and VMAT plans had significantly lower mean doses to the supraglottic larynx (31 Gy, 18.5 Gy, 17 Gy; p < 0.01), the MDACC-defined larynx (13.4 Gy, 10.5 Gy, 9.8 Gy; p < 0.01), and RTOG-defined larynx (15.8 Gy, 12.1 Gy, 11.1 Gy; p < 0.01), respectively. Mean esophageal dose was lowest with SF-IMRT over WF-IMRT and VMAT (5.9 Gy, 12.2 Gy, 11.1 Gy; p < 0.01) but only in the absence of lower neck disease. On average, VMAT plans had shorter treatment times and required less monitor units than both SF-IMRT and WF-IMRT. Conclusion In the setting of unilateral neck radiotherapy, WF-IMRT and VMAT plans can be optimized to significantly improve dose sparing of critical structures compared to SF-IMRT. VMAT offers additional advantages of shorter treatment times and fewer required monitor units.
Collapse
|
31
|
Chapman BV, Lei X, Patil P, Tripathi S, Nicklaus K, Fingeret M, Shaitelman SF, Hunt K, Buchholz T, Merchant F, Markey M, Smith B, Reddy JP. Quantitative 3D Assessment of Breast Cosmesis After Conventional (CF-WBI) versus Hypofractionated Whole Breast Radiation (HF-WBI): Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(19)30444-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
32
|
Abstract
The management of cancers of the head and neck focuses on primary site and regional (neck) disease control. Many patients are treated with surgery as the principal mode of treatment, and surgery often includes an elective or therapeutic neck dissection. Risk factors assessed for recurrence subsequent to neck dissection include nodal size, number, levels, and the presence of extranodal spread. Adjuvant radiation therapy (with or without chemotherapy) is offered to patients deemed at sufficient risk of recurrence based on assessment of these factors. However, randomized trials have not been performed to test the need and/or benefit of adjuvant postoperative radiation. The necessity of adjuvant radiation has been based on decades of clinical observations, retrospective studies, and indirect randomized trials. The case for postoperative radiation for patients with adverse features in the neck, and recommendations are made in the accompanying article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam S Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| | - Jay P Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Lin TA, Garden AS, Elhalawani H, Elgohari B, Jethanandani A, Ng SP, Mohamed AS, Frank SJ, Glisson BS, Debnam JM, Sturgis EM, Phan J, Reddy JP, Fuller CD, Morrison WH, Skinner HD, Rosenthal DI, Gunn GB. Radiographic retropharyngeal lymph node involvement in HPV-associated oropharyngeal carcinoma: Patterns of involvement and impact on patient outcomes. Cancer 2019; 125:1536-1546. [PMID: 30620385 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2018] [Revised: 10/17/2018] [Accepted: 10/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of the current study was to characterize the incidence, pattern, and impact on oncologic outcomes of retropharyngeal lymph node (RPLN) involvement in HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). METHODS Data regarding patients with HPV-associated OPC who were treated at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center with intensity-modulated radiotherapy from 2004 through 2013 were analyzed retrospectively. RPLN status was determined by reviewing pretreatment imaging and/or reports. Outcomes analysis was restricted to patients with lymph node-positive (+) disease. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were generated and survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. Bayesian information criterion assessed model performance changes with the addition of RPLN status to current American Joint Committee on Cancer staging. Competing risk analysis compared modes of disease recurrence. RESULTS The incidence of radiographic RPLN involvement was 9% (73 of 796 patients) and was found to vary by primary tumor site. The 5-year rates of freedom from distant metastases (FDM) and overall survival were lower in patients with RPLN(+) status compared with those with RPLN-negative (-) status (84% vs 93% [P = .0327] and 74% vs 87% [P = .0078], respectively). RPLN(+) status was not found to be associated with outcomes on multivariate analysis. Bayesian information criterion analysis demonstrated that current American Joint Committee on Cancer staging was not improved with the inclusion of RPLN. Locoregional and distant disease recurrence probabilities for those patients with RPLN(+) status were 8% and 13%, respectively, compared with 10% and 6%, respectively, for those with RPLN(-) status. RPLN(+) status portended worse 5-year FDM in the low-risk subgroup (smoking history of <10 pack-years) and among patients who received concurrent chemotherapy but not induction chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS RPLN(+) status was associated with worse overall survival and FDM on univariate but not multivariate analysis. In subgroup analyses, RPLN(+) status was associated with poorer FDM in both patients with a smoking history of <10 pack-years and those who received concurrent chemotherapy, suggesting that RPLN(+) status could be considered an exclusion criteria in treatment deintensification efforts seeking to omit chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy A Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Adam S Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Hesham Elhalawani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Baher Elgohari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Amit Jethanandani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sweet P Ng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Abdallah S Mohamed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Department of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Bonnie S Glisson
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - J Matthew Debnam
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Erich M Sturgis
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jay P Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Clifton D Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - William H Morrison
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Heath D Skinner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - G Brandon Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Reddy JP, Atkinson RL, Larson R, Burks JK, Smith D, Debeb BG, Ruffell B, Creighton CJ, Bambhroliya A, Reuben JM, Van Laere SJ, Krishnamurthy S, Symmans WF, Brewster AM, Woodward WA. Mammary stem cell and macrophage markers are enriched in normal tissue adjacent to inflammatory breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018; 171:283-293. [PMID: 29858753 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-4835-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2018] [Accepted: 05/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We hypothesized that breast tissue not involved by tumor in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) patients contains intrinsic differences, including increased mammary stem cells and macrophage infiltration, which may promote the IBC phenotype. MATERIALS AND METHODS Normal breast parenchyma ≥ 5 cm away from primary tumors was obtained from mastectomy specimens. This included an initial cohort of 8 IBC patients and 60 non-IBC patients followed by a validation cohort of 19 IBC patients and 25 non-IBC patients. Samples were immunostained for either CD44+CD49f+CD133/2+ mammary stem cell markers or the CD68 macrophage marker and correlated with IBC status. Quantitation of positive cells was determined using inForm software from PerkinElmer. We also examined the association between IBC status and previously published tumorigenic stem cell and IBC tumor signatures in the validation cohort samples. RESULTS 8 of 8 IBC samples expressed isolated CD44+CD49f+CD133/2+ stem cell marked cells in the initial cohort as opposed to 0/60 non-IBC samples (p = 0.001). Similarly, the median number of CD44+CD49f+CD133/2+ cells was significantly higher in the IBC validation cohort as opposed to the non-IBC validation cohort (25.7 vs. 14.2, p = 0.007). 7 of 8 IBC samples expressed CD68 + histologically confirmed macrophages in initial cohort as opposed to 12/48 non-IBC samples (p = 0.001). In the validation cohort, the median number of CD68 + cells in IBC was 3.7 versus 1.0 in the non-IBC cohort (p = 0.06). IBC normal tissue was positively associated with a tumorigenic stem cell signature (p = 0.02) and with a 79-gene IBC signature (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Normal tissue from IBC patients is enriched for both mammary stem cells and macrophages and has higher association with both a tumorigenic stem cell signature and IBC-specific tumor signature. Collectively, these data suggest that IBC normal tissue differs from non-IBC tissue. Whether these changes occur before the tumor develops or is induced by tumor warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jay P Reddy
- Departments of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,MD Anderson Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Clinic and Research Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rachel L Atkinson
- Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Richard Larson
- Departments of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,MD Anderson Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Clinic and Research Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jared K Burks
- Flow Cytometry and Cell Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Daniel Smith
- Departments of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,MD Anderson Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Clinic and Research Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bisrat G Debeb
- MD Anderson Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Clinic and Research Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Brian Ruffell
- Department of Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Chad J Creighton
- Department of Medicine and Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Arvind Bambhroliya
- Departments of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,MD Anderson Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Clinic and Research Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - James M Reuben
- Department of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven J Van Laere
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Center for Oncological Research, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Savitri Krishnamurthy
- Department of Breast Surgical Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - William F Symmans
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Abenaa M Brewster
- Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Wendy A Woodward
- Departments of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. .,MD Anderson Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Clinic and Research Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. .,Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Clinic and Research Program, Unit 1202, Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Akhtari M, Milgrom SA, Pinnix CC, Reddy JP, Dong W, Smith GL, Mawlawi O, Abou Yehia Z, Gunther J, Osborne EM, Andraos TY, Wogan CF, Rohren E, Garg N, Chuang H, Khoury JD, Oki Y, Fanale M, Dabaja BS. Reclassifying patients with early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma based on functional radiographic markers at presentation. Blood 2018; 131:84-94. [PMID: 29038339 PMCID: PMC5755043 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2017-04-773838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2017] [Accepted: 10/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The presence of bulky disease in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), traditionally defined with a 1-dimensional measurement, can change a patient's risk grouping and thus the treatment approach. We hypothesized that 3-dimensional measurements of disease burden obtained from baseline 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scans, such as metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG), would more accurately risk-stratify patients. To test this hypothesis, we reviewed pretreatment PET-CT scans of patients with stage I-II HL treated at our institution between 2003 and 2013. Disease was delineated on prechemotherapy PET-CT scans by 2 methods: (1) manual contouring and (2) subthresholding of these contours to give the tumor volume with standardized uptake value ≥2.5. MTV and TLG were extracted from the threshold volumes (MTVt, TLGt) and from the manually contoured soft-tissue volumes. At a median follow-up of 4.96 years for the 267 patients evaluated, 27 patients were diagnosed with relapsed or refractory disease and 12 died. Both MTVt and TLGt were highly correlated with freedom from progression and were dichotomized with 80th percentile cutoff values of 268 and 1703, respectively. Consideration of MTV and TLG enabled restratification of early unfavorable HL patients as having low- and high-risk disease. We conclude that MTV and TLG provide a potential measure of tumor burden to aid in risk stratification of early unfavorable HL patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mani Akhtari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Medical Branch Hospitals, Galveston, TX
| | - Sarah A Milgrom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Chelsea C Pinnix
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jay P Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Grace L Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Osama Mawlawi
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Zeinab Abou Yehia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jillian Gunther
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Eleanor M Osborne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Therese Y Andraos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Christine F Wogan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Eric Rohren
- Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; and
| | | | | | | | - Yasuhiro Oki
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Michelle Fanale
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Bouthaina S Dabaja
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Reddy JP, Hernandez M, Gunther JR, Dabaja BS, Martin GV, Jiang W, Akhtari M, Allen PK, Atkinson BJ, Smith GL, Pinnix CC, Milgrom SA, Abou Yehia Z, Osborne EM, Oki Y, Lee H, Hagemeister F, Fanale MA. Pre-treatment neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and platelet/lymphocyte ratio are prognostic of progression in early stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Br J Haematol 2017; 180:545-549. [DOI: 10.1111/bjh.15054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2017] [Accepted: 10/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jay P. Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston TX USA
| | - Mike Hernandez
- Department of Biostatistics; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston TX USA
| | - Jillian R. Gunther
- Department of Radiation Oncology; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston TX USA
| | - Bouthaina S. Dabaja
- Department of Radiation Oncology; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston TX USA
| | - Geoffrey V. Martin
- Department of Radiation Oncology; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston TX USA
| | - Wen Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston TX USA
| | - Mani Akhtari
- Department of Radiation Oncology; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston TX USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology; The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston; Galveston TX USA
| | - Pamela K. Allen
- Department of Radiation Oncology; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston TX USA
| | - Bradley J. Atkinson
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy Services; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston TX USA
| | - Grace L. Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston TX USA
| | - Chelsea C. Pinnix
- Department of Radiation Oncology; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston TX USA
| | - Sarah A. Milgrom
- Department of Radiation Oncology; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston TX USA
| | - Zeinab Abou Yehia
- Department of Radiation Oncology; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston TX USA
| | - Eleanor M. Osborne
- Department of Radiation Oncology; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston TX USA
| | - Yasuhiro Oki
- Department of Lymphoma Medical Oncology; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston TX USA
| | - Hun Lee
- Department of Lymphoma Medical Oncology; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston TX USA
| | - Fredrick Hagemeister
- Department of Lymphoma Medical Oncology; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston TX USA
| | - Michelle A. Fanale
- Department of Lymphoma Medical Oncology; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston TX USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Milgrom SA, Pinnix CC, Chuang H, Oki Y, Akhtari M, Mawlawi O, Garg N, Gunther JR, Reddy JP, Smith GL, Rohren E, Hagemeister FB, Lee HJ, Fayad LE, Dong W, Osborne EM, Abou Yehia Z, Fanale M, Dabaja BS. Early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma outcomes after combined modality therapy according to the post-chemotherapy 5-point score: can residual pet-positive disease be cured with radiotherapy alone? Br J Haematol 2017; 179:488-496. [PMID: 28832956 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.14902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2017] [Accepted: 07/18/2017] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Early-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients are evaluated by an end-of-chemotherapy positron emission tomography-computed tomography (eoc-PET-CT) after doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (ABVD) and before radiation therapy (RT). We determined freedom from progression (FFP) in patients treated with ABVD and RT according to the eoc-PET-CT 5-point score (5PS). Secondarily, we assessed whether patients with a positive eoc-PET-CT (5PS of 4-5) can be cured with RT alone. The cohort comprised 174 patients treated for stage I-II HL with ABVD and RT alone. ABVD was given with a median of four cycles and RT with a median dose of 30·6 Gy. Five-year FFP was 97%. Five-year FFP was 100% (0 relapses/98 patients) for patients with a 5PS of 1-2, 97% (2/65) for a 5PS of 3, 83% (1/8) for a 5PS of 4, and 67% (1/3) for a 5PS of 5 (P < 0·001). Patients with positive eoc-PET-CT scans who were selected for salvage RT alone had experienced a very good partial response to ABVD. Risk factors for recurrence in this subgroup included a small reduction in tumour size and a 'bounce' in ≥1 PET-CT parameter (reduction then rise from interim to final scan). Thus, a positive eoc-PET-CT is associated with inferior FFP; however, appropriately selected patients can be cured with RT alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah A Milgrom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chelsea C Pinnix
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hubert Chuang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yasuhiro Oki
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mani Akhtari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Osama Mawlawi
- Department of Imaging Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Naveen Garg
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jillian R Gunther
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jay P Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Grace L Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Eric Rohren
- Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Hun J Lee
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Luis E Fayad
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Wenli Dong
- Department of Biostatistics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Eleanor M Osborne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Zeinab Abou Yehia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michelle Fanale
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bouthaina S Dabaja
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Stecklein SR, Reddy JP, Wolfe AR, Lopez MS, Fouad TM, Debeb BG, Ueno NT, Brewster AM, Woodward WA. Lack of Breastfeeding History in Parous Women with Inflammatory Breast Cancer Predicts Poor Disease-Free Survival. J Cancer 2017; 8:1726-1732. [PMID: 28819368 PMCID: PMC5556634 DOI: 10.7150/jca.20095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2017] [Accepted: 05/09/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Breastfeeding alters the breast microenvironment, and several lines of evidence suggest the breast microenvironment contributes to the clinical phenotype of inflammatory breast cancer. We investigated breastfeeding history as a modifier of locoregional recurrence (LRR), distant metastasis (DM), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) in parous women with inflammatory breast cancer. Methods: Parous women with inflammatory breast cancer were identified from a prospective registry at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. We compared patient and tumor characteristics, LRR, DM, DFS, and OS patients with (BF+) and without (BF-) a history of breastfeeding. Results: Eighty-two patients were included. At a median follow-up of 50 months, BF+ patients had significantly lower risk of LRR (9.0% vs. 23.6%; p=0.01), a lower risk of DM (26.8% vs. 53.8%; p=0.008), and better DFS (73.1% vs. 48.1%; p=0.006) than BF- patients. On multivariate analysis, BF+ history was associated with significantly lower risk of DM (hazard ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.15-0.97; p=0.04) and better DFS (hazard ratio 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.15-0.93; p=0.04) after adjusting for established predictive and prognostic variables. The prognostic significance of breastfeeding may be most pronounced in women with triple-negative IBC. Conclusion: A lack of breastfeeding history in parous women with inflammatory breast cancer may predict worse prognosis. We speculate that breastfeeding-induced alterations in the breast microenvironment may alter the aggressiveness of inflammatory breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Tamer M Fouad
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.,Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | | | - Naoto T Ueno
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.,Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic
| | - Abenaa M Brewster
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.,Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Wendy A Woodward
- Department of Radiation Oncology.,Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Reddy JP, Lei X, Patil P, Nicklaus KM, Fingeret MC, Shaitelman SF, Hunt KK, Buchholz TA, Merchant F, Markey MK, Smith BD. (S006) Using Quantitative 3D Metrics of Breast Cosmesis to Compare Fractionation Regimens for Whole Breast Irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.02.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
40
|
Ho JC, Dabaja BS, Milgrom SA, Smith GL, Reddy JP, Mazloom A, Young KH, Deng L, Medeiros LJ, Dong W, Allen PK, Andraos TY, Fowler NH, Nastoupil LJ, Oki Y, Fayad LE, Turturro F, Neelapu SS, Westin J, Hagemeister FB, Rodriguez MA, Pinnix CC. Radiation therapy improves survival in patients with testicular diffuse large B-cell lymphoma<sup/>. Leuk Lymphoma 2017; 58:2833-2844. [PMID: 28482717 DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2017.1312381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
In 120 Stage I-IV testicular diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients treated from 1964 to 2015, we assessed the benefits of prophylactic contralateral testicular radiation (RT) and prophylactic central nervous system (CNS) therapy on overall, progression free, testicular relapse free, and CNS relapse free survival (OS, PFS, TRFS, and CRFS, respectively). Seventy percent of patients received RT, 53% received anthracyclines and rituximab (modern therapy), and 61% received CNS prophylaxis. On univariate analysis RT was associated with improved TRFS, PFS, and trended toward improved OS. On multivariate analysis (MVA), RT was significantly associated with improved OS and PFS; the PFS benefit persisted among patients receiving modern therapy. CNS prophylaxis was associated with improved OS, PFS, and TRFS, but not CRFS on univariate analysis, and was not significant on MVA. RT is associated with improved survival, and should be considered for all testicular DLBCL patients, but additional strategies are needed to prevent CNS relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer C Ho
- a Department of Radiation Oncology , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Bouthaina S Dabaja
- a Department of Radiation Oncology , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Sarah A Milgrom
- a Department of Radiation Oncology , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Grace L Smith
- a Department of Radiation Oncology , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Jay P Reddy
- a Department of Radiation Oncology , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Ali Mazloom
- b Tacoma Valley Radiation Oncology , Tacoma , WA , USA
| | - Ken H Young
- c Department of Hematopathology , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Lijuan Deng
- c Department of Hematopathology , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - L Jeffrey Medeiros
- c Department of Hematopathology , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Wenli Dong
- d Department of Biostatistics , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Pamela K Allen
- a Department of Radiation Oncology , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Therese Y Andraos
- a Department of Radiation Oncology , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Nathan H Fowler
- e Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Loretta J Nastoupil
- e Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Yasuhiro Oki
- e Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Luis E Fayad
- e Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Francesco Turturro
- e Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Sattva S Neelapu
- e Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Jason Westin
- e Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Fredrick B Hagemeister
- e Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Maria Alma Rodriguez
- e Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Chelsea C Pinnix
- a Department of Radiation Oncology , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Reddy JP, Atkinson RL, Larson RA, Burks JK, Smith D, Debeb BG, Ruffell B, Creighton C, Reuben JM, Krishnamurthy S, Symmans WF, Brewster A, Van Laere SJ. Abstract P4-03-14: Stem cell and macrophage markers are enriched in normal tissue adjacent to inflammatory breast cancer. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-p4-03-14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: We hypothesized that normal breast tissue in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) patients contains intrinsic differences, including increased mammary stem cells and macrophage infiltration, which may promote the IBC phenotype.
Materials and Methods: Normal breast tissue at least 5cm away from primary tumors were obtained from mastectomy specimens. This included an initial cohort of 8 IBC patients and 60 non-IBC patients followed by a validation cohort of 19 IBC patients and 25 non-IBC patients. Samples were immunostained for either CD44+CD49f+CD133/2+ stem cell markers or the CD68 macrophage marker and correlated with IBC status. Automated quantitation of positive cells was employed for the validation cohort. We also examined the association between IBC status and previously published tumorigenic stem cell and IBC tumor signatures in the validation cohort samples.
Results: 8 of 8 IBC normal tissue samples expressed CD44+CD49f+CD133/2+ stem cell markers in the initial cohort as opposed to 0/60 non-IBC normal tissue samples (p=0.001). Similarly, the median number of CD44+CD49f+CD133/2+ cells was 25.7 in the IBC validation cohort as opposed to 14.2 in the non-IBC validation cohort (p=0.007). 7 of 8 IBC samples expressed CD68+ macrophages in initial cohort as opposed to 12/48 non-IBC samples (p=0.001). In the validation cohort the median number of CD68+ cells was 3.7 in the IBC cohort vs 1.0 in the non-IBC cohort (p=0.06). Normal tissue of IBC patients was positively associated with a tumorigenic stem cell signature (p=0.02) and with a 79-gene IBC gene signature (p<0.001).
Conclusions: Normal tissue from IBC patients is enriched for both mammary stem cells and macrophages. Further, normal tissue of IBC patients has higher association with both a tumorigenic stem cell signature and IBC-specific tumor signature. Collectively, these data suggest that normal tissue from IBC patients is distinct from non-IBC normal tissue and may support the hypothesis that a primed normal breast contributes to the development of IBC symptoms upon oncogenic insult. Validation of these results in additional normal tissue in cancer-free women would better determine causality.
Citation Format: Reddy JP, Atkinson RL, Larson RA, Burks JK, Smith D, Debeb BG, Ruffell B, Creighton C, Reuben JM, Krishnamurthy S, Symmans WF, Brewster A, Van Laere SJ. Stem cell and macrophage markers are enriched in normal tissue adjacent to inflammatory breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-03-14.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- JP Reddy
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - RL Atkinson
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - RA Larson
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - JK Burks
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - D Smith
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - BG Debeb
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - B Ruffell
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - C Creighton
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - JM Reuben
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - S Krishnamurthy
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - WF Symmans
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - A Brewster
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - SJ Van Laere
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; University of Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Reddy JP, Lei X, Huang SC, Nicklaus KM, Fingeret MC, Shaitelman SF, Hunt KK, Buchholz TA, Merchant F, Markey MK, Smith BD. Quantitative Assessment of Breast Cosmetic Outcome After Whole-Breast Irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016; 97:894-902. [PMID: 28333010 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.12.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2016] [Revised: 11/17/2016] [Accepted: 12/14/2016] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To measure, by quantitative analysis of digital photographs, breast cosmetic outcome within the setting of a randomized trial of conventionally fractionated (CF) and hypofractionated (HF) whole-breast irradiation (WBI), to identify how quantitative cosmesis metrics were associated with patient- and physician-reported cosmesis and whether they differed by treatment arm. METHODS AND MATERIALS From 2011 to 2014, 287 women aged ≥40 with ductal carcinoma in situ or early invasive breast cancer were randomized to HF-WBI (42.56 Gy/16 fractions [fx] + 10-12.5 Gy/4-5 fx boost) or CF-WBI (50 Gy/25 fx + 10-14 Gy/5-7 fx). At 1 year after treatment we collected digital photographs, patient-reported cosmesis using the Breast Cancer Treatment and Outcomes Scale, and physician-reported cosmesis using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scale. Six quantitative measures of breast symmetry, labeled M1-M6, were calculated from anteroposterior digital photographs. For each measure, values closer to 1 imply greater symmetry, and values closer to 0 imply greater asymmetry. Associations between M1-M6 and patient- and physician-reported cosmesis and treatment arm were evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS Among 245 evaluable patients, patient-reported cosmesis was strongly associated with M1 (vertical symmetry measure) (P<.01). Physician-reported cosmesis was similarly correlated with M1 (P<.01) and also with M2 (vertical symmetry, P=.01) and M4 (horizontal symmetry, P=.03). At 1 year after treatment, HF-WBI resulted in better values of M2 (P=.02) and M3 (P<.01) than CF-WBI; treatment arm was not significantly associated with M1, M4, M5, or M6 (P≥.12). CONCLUSIONS Quantitative assessment of breast photographs reveals similar to improved cosmetic outcome with HF-WBI compared with CF-WBI 1 year after treatment. Assessing cosmetic outcome using these measures could be useful for future comparative effectiveness studies and outcome reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jay P Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Xiudong Lei
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sheng-Cheng Huang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, Texas
| | - Krista M Nicklaus
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, Texas
| | - Michelle C Fingeret
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Simona F Shaitelman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Kelly K Hunt
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Thomas A Buchholz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Fatima Merchant
- Department of Engineering Technology, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Mia K Markey
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, Texas; Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Benjamin D Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Reddy JP, Tang C, Shih T, Kim B, Kim C, Nguyen QN, Welsh J, Benveniste M, Zhang J, Liao Z, Gomez DR. Influence of Surveillance PET/CT on Detection of Early Recurrence After Definitive Radiation in Stage III Non-small-cell Lung Cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 2016; 18:141-148. [PMID: 27913215 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2016.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2016] [Revised: 10/24/2016] [Accepted: 11/01/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are few data to support the use of varying imaging modalities in evaluating recurrence in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We compared the efficacy of surveillance positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) versus CT scans of the chest in detecting recurrences after definitive radiation for NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 200 patients treated between 2000 and 2011 who met the inclusion criteria of stage III NSCLC, completion of definitive radiation treatment, and absence of recurrence within the initial 6 months. These patients were then grouped on the basis of the use of PET/CT imaging during postradiation surveillance. Patients who received ≥ 1 PET/CT scans within 6 months of the end of radiation treatment were placed in the PET group whereas all others were placed in the CT group. We compared survival times from the end of treatment to the date of death or last follow-up using log rank tests. Multivariate analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with decreased survival. RESULTS In the entire cohort, median event-free survival (EFS) was 26.7 months, and median overall survival (OS) was 41.2 months. The CT group had a median EFS of 21.4 months versus 29.4 months for the PET group (P = .59). There was no difference in OS between the CT and PET groups (median OS of 41.2 and 41.3 months, respectively; P = .59). There was also no difference in local recurrence-free survival or distant metastases-free survival between the CT-only and PET/CT groups (P = .92 and P = .30, respectively). Similarly, in multivariate analysis, stratification into the PET group was not associated with improved EFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-1.34; P = .60) or OS (HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.83-1.7; P = .34). CONCLUSIONS In stage III NSCLC patients treated with definitive radiation and without early recurrence, PET/CT scan surveillance did not result in decreased time to detection of locoregional or distant recurrence or improved survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jay P Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Chad Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Tina Shih
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Bumyang Kim
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Charissa Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Quynh-Nhu Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - James Welsh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Marcelo Benveniste
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jianjun Zhang
- Department of Thoracic Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Zhongxing Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Daniel R Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Reddy JP, Pettaway CA, Levy LB, Pagliaro LC, Tamboli P, Rao P, Jayaratna I, Hoffman KE. Factors associated with regional recurrence after lymph node dissection for penile squamous cell carcinoma. BJU Int 2016; 119:591-597. [PMID: 27753187 DOI: 10.1111/bju.13686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify factors associated with regional recurrence after lymph node dissection (LND) for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) to determine which patients might benefit from adjuvant therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Men who underwent LND for penile SCC from 1977 to 2014 were identified from an institutional database. Kaplan-Meier curves estimated recurrence-free survival (RFS) calculated from the date of LND. Cox regression models evaluated the association between RFS and patient and tumour characteristics. RESULTS In all, 182 men who underwent LND for penile SCC were identified. The median patient age was 62 years and the median follow-up was 4.2 years. After LND 34 men had regional recurrence, of which 24 developed isolated regional recurrences without distant metastasis. The median RFS was 5.7 months, and the 3-year RFS rate was 70%. On univariate analysis, lymphovascular invasion, clinical and pathological nodal stage, pathological inguinal laterality, pelvic nodal involvement, lymph node density ≥5.2%, ≥3 pathologically involved lymph nodes, and extranodal extension (ENE) were associated with worse RFS (all P < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, clinical N3 disease [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR)] 3.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.68-7.45; P = 0.001), ≥3 pathologically involved lymph nodes (AHR 3.78, 95% CI 2.12-6.65; P < 0.001), and ENE (AHR 3.32, 95% CI 1.93-5.76; P < 0.001) were associated with worse RFS. The 3-year RFS for patients with cN0, cN1, cN2, and cN3 disease was 91.7%, 64.5%, 54.7%, and 38.3%, respectively. For men with ≥3 involved nodes, the 3-year RFS was 17% vs 82.4% in men with <3 involved nodes. The 3-year RFS was 29.7% in men with ENE and 85.7% in men without ENE. CONCLUSION The presence of clinical N3 disease, ≥3 pathologically involved lymph nodes, and ENE was associated with worse RFS. As regional recurrence portends a dismal prognosis with few salvage options, adjuvant therapies should be developed for men with the aforementioned adverse factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jay P Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Curtis A Pettaway
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lawrence B Levy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Pheroze Tamboli
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Priya Rao
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Isuru Jayaratna
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Karen E Hoffman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Milgrom SA, Dong W, Akhtari M, Smith GL, Pinnix CC, Mawlawi O, Rohren E, Garg N, Chuang H, Yehia ZA, Reddy JP, Gunther JR, Khoury JD, Suki T, Osborne EM, Oki Y, Fanale M, Dabaja BS. Chemotherapy Response Assessment by FDG-PET-CT in Early-stage Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma: Moving Beyond the Five-Point Deauville Score. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016; 97:333-338. [PMID: 28068241 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.10.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2016] [Revised: 10/05/2016] [Accepted: 10/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In early-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma, fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT) scans are performed routinely after chemotherapy, and the 5-point Deauville score is used to report the disease response. We hypothesized that other PET-CT parameters, considered in combination with Deauville score, would improve risk stratification. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients treated for stage I to II Hodgkin lymphoma from 2003 to 2013, who were aged ≥18 years and had analyzable PET-CT scans performed before and after chemotherapy, were eligible. The soft tissue volume (STV), maximum standardized uptake value, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis were recorded from the PET-CT scans before and after chemotherapy. Reductions were defined as 1 - (final PET-CT value)/(corresponding initial PET-CT value). The primary endpoint was freedom from progression (FFP). RESULTS For 202 patients treated with chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy, the 5-year FFP was 89% (95% confidence interval 85%-93%). All PET-CT parameters were strongly associated with the Deauville score (P<.001) and FFP (P<.0001) on univariate analysis. The Deauville score was highly predictive of FFP (C-index 0.89) but was less discriminating in the Deauville 1 to 4 subset (C-index 0.67). Therefore, we aimed to identify PET-CT parameters that would improve risk stratification for this subgroup (n=187). STV reduction was predictive of outcome (C-index 0.71) and was dichotomized with an optimal cutoff of 0.65 (65% reduction in STV). A model incorporating the Deauville score and STV reduction predicted FFP more accurately than either measurement alone in the Deauville 1 to 4 subset (C-index 0.83). The improvement in predictive accuracy of this composite measure compared with the Deauville score alone met statistical significance (P=.045). CONCLUSIONS The relative reduction in tumor size is an independent predictor of outcome. Combined with the Deauville score, it might improve risk stratification and contribute to response-adapted individualization of therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah A Milgrom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| | - Wenli Dong
- Department of Biostatistics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Mani Akhtari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Grace L Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Chelsea C Pinnix
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Osama Mawlawi
- Department of Imaging Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Eric Rohren
- Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Naveen Garg
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Hubert Chuang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Zeinab Abou Yehia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jay P Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jillian R Gunther
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Joseph D Khoury
- Department of Hematopathology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Tina Suki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Eleanor M Osborne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Yasuhiro Oki
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Michelle Fanale
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Bouthaina S Dabaja
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Gunther JR, Fanale MA, Reddy JP, Akhtari M, Smith GL, Pinnix CC, Milgrom SA, Yehia ZA, Allen PK, Osborne EM, Mawlawi O, Dabaja BS. Treatment of Early-Stage Unfavorable Hodgkin Lymphoma: Efficacy and Toxicity of 4 Versus 6 Cycles of ABVD Chemotherapy With Radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016; 96:110-8. [PMID: 27325479 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.03.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2016] [Revised: 03/28/2016] [Accepted: 03/30/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The German Hodgkin Study Group HD11 trial validated 4 cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (ABVD) chemotherapy followed by involved field radiation therapy (IFRT) for early unfavorable Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients. However, practitioners often recommend 6 cycles followed by RT, especially for bulky disease. We compared patient outcomes after treatment with 4 or 6 cycles of ABVD followed by RT (IFRT and involved site RT [ISRT]). METHODS AND MATERIALS We identified 128 patients treated for early unfavorable HL (GHSG criteria) between 2000 and 2013. Clinical outcomes (overall survival [OS] and freedom from relapse [FFR]) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Toxicities were evaluated. RESULTS The median follow-up time was 5.0 years. Patients received 4 (70 patients, 55%) or 6 (58 patients, 45%) cycles of chemotherapy. Bulky disease was present in 22 patients (31%; 0 stage IA, 3 stage IB, 19 stage IIA) of the 4-cycle group and 42 patients (72%; 5 stage IA, 3 stage IB, 34 stage IIA) of the 6-cycle group. For patients receiving 4 and 6 cycles, the 6-year OS was 100% and 97% (P=.35), respectively, and the 6 year FFR was 100% and 98% (P=.28), respectively. More patients received 6 cycles if they were treated before 2010 (HD11 report) (P=.01) and if they had bulky disease (P<.01). Sixty-eight percent of patients received ISRT. The 6-year FFR was 99% and 100% for patients receiving ISRT and IFRT, respectively (P=.58). More patients experienced bleomycin pulmonary toxicity in the 6-cycle group (20% vs 31%, P=.16). For patients with bulky disease, the 4-year FFR was similar with receipt of 4 (100%) or 6 (98%) cycles (P=.48) and IFRT (100%) or ISRT (98%) (P=.52). There were no deaths among patients with bulky disease. CONCLUSIONS Patients with early unfavorable HL have excellent outcomes with 4 cycles of ABVD chemotherapy followed by ISRT. Six cycles of chemotherapy does not appear superior for disease control, even for bulky disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jillian R Gunther
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Michelle A Fanale
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jay P Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Mani Akhtari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, Texas
| | - Grace L Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Chelsea C Pinnix
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sarah A Milgrom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Zeinab Abou Yehia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Pamela K Allen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Eleanor M Osborne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Osama Mawlawi
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Bouthaina S Dabaja
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Reddy JP, Dawood S, Mitchell M, Debeb BG, Bloom E, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Sulman EP, Buchholz TA, Woodward WA. Antiepileptic drug use improves overall survival in breast cancer patients with brain metastases in the setting of whole brain radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2015; 117:308-14. [PMID: 26482599 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2014] [Revised: 10/08/2015] [Accepted: 10/09/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE There is mounting evidence that histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors, e.g. valproic acid (VPA), synergize with radiation to improve outcomes in several cancers. This study was conducted to ascertain whether VPA affected outcomes in breast cancer patients with brain metastases treated with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS Records from 253 breast cancer patients with brain metastases treated with WBRT were reviewed. Data regarding use of all antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were extracted. Kaplan-Meier survival times were calculated using the date of brain involvement as time zero. Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine the association between patient and tumor characteristics and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Median OS for the entire patient cohort was 6 months. Patients receiving VPA (n=20) had a median OS of 11 months versus 5 months for those not receiving VPA (p=0.028). Median OS was 9 months for patients taking any AED (n=101) versus 4 months for those not taking AEDs (p=0.0003). On multivariate analysis both VPA and AED use were associated with improved OS (HR 0.61, p=0.0419; HR 0.59, p=0.0002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS This study suggests the use of AEDs, including VPA, is associated with improved OS in breast cancer patients with brain metastases following WBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jay P Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Shaheenah Dawood
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dubai Hospital, United Arab Emirates
| | - Melissa Mitchell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Bisrat G Debeb
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Elizabeth Bloom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Erik P Sulman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Thomas A Buchholz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Wendy A Woodward
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Youssef B, Shank J, Reddy JP, Pinnix CC, Farha G, Akhtari M, Allen PK, Fanale MA, Garcia JA, Horace PH, Milgrom S, Smith GL, Nieto Y, Arzu I, Wang H, Fowler N, Rodriguez MA, Dabaja B. Incidence and predictors of Lhermitte's sign among patients receiving mediastinal radiation for lymphoma. Radiat Oncol 2015; 10:206. [PMID: 26407853 PMCID: PMC4582821 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-015-0504-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2015] [Accepted: 09/09/2015] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To prospectively examine the risk of developing Lhermitte's sign (LS) in patients with lymphoma treated with modern-era chemotherapy followed by consolidation intensity-modulated radiation therapy. METHODS We prospectively interviewed all patients with lymphoma who received irradiation to the mediastinum from July 2011 through April 2014. We extracted patient, disease, and treatment-related variables from the medical records of those patients and dosimetric variables from treatment-planning systems and analyzed these factors to identify potential predictors of LS with Pearson chi-square tests. RESULTS During the study period 106 patients received mediastinal radiation for lymphoma, and 31 (29 %) developed LS. No correlations were found between LS and any of the variables examined, including total radiation dose, maximum point dose to the spinal cord, volume receiving 105 % of the dose, and volumes receiving 5 or 15 Gy. CONCLUSION In this group of patients, treatment with chemotherapy followed by intensity-modulated radiation therapy led to 29 % developing LS; this symptom was independent of radiation dose and seemed to be an idiosyncratic reaction. This relatively high incidence could have resulted from prospective use of a structured interview.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bassem Youssef
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - JoAnn Shank
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Jay P Reddy
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Chelsea C Pinnix
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - George Farha
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Mani Akhtari
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX, USA.
| | - Pamela K Allen
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Michelle A Fanale
- Departments of Lymphoma & Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - John A Garcia
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Patricia H Horace
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Sarah Milgrom
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Grace Li Smith
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Yago Nieto
- Departments of Stem Cell Transplantation, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Isadora Arzu
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - He Wang
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Nathan Fowler
- Departments of Lymphoma & Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Maria Alma Rodriguez
- Departments of Lymphoma & Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Bouthaina Dabaja
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Reddy JP, Akhtari M, Smith GL, Pinnix C, Osborne EM, Gunther JR, Allen PK, Yehia ZA, Fanale M, Rodriguez MA, Fowler N, Milgrom SA, Wogan CF, Dabaja BS. Outcomes After Chemotherapy Followed by Radiation for Stage IIB Hodgkin Lymphoma With Bulky Disease. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 2015; 15:664-670.e2. [PMID: 26321471 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2015.07.633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2015] [Revised: 07/09/2015] [Accepted: 07/28/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment of stage IIB bulky Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is controversial, with treatment varying by institution. We evaluated patients with IIB bulky disease treated with combined-modality therapy at our institution by describing their long-term outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS We identified 149 consecutive patients with stage IIB bulky HL treated between 1971 and 2012. Clinical, pathologic, and treatment characteristics were extracted from medical records. Actuarial overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Independent factors associated with these outcomes were identified by a multivariate Cox regression model. Outcomes were further compared against comparison groups of both advanced-stage and stage IIB patients treated between 1971 and 2009. RESULTS The 8-year OS rate for patients with stage IIB bulky disease who received combined-modality ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) and radiation was 88.8%; the 8-year RFS rate was 76.8%. On multivariate analysis, age < 40 years (hazard ratio [HR], 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14-0.57; P = .001), receipt of ABVD (vs. MOPP [mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone]; HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.10-0.88; P = .028), and radiation dose ≥ 30.1 Gy (HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.11-0.65; P = .006) were associated with improved OS. Cardiac events (n = 11) and secondary malignancies (n = 11) only occurred in patients treated before 1995. A subgroup analysis demonstrated significantly improved survival in IIB bulky versus advanced-stage patients (8-year OS, 73.4% vs. 57.4%; P = .008). Improved outcomes in patients with in IIB bulky disease were especially evident in the modern era (> 1995; P = .004). CONCLUSION Patients with stage IIB bulky HL had excellent outcomes after combined-modality therapy. Treatment strategies have changed substantially over time, with concomitant improvements in disease outcomes and long-term toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jay P Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Mani Akhtari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX
| | - Grace L Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Chelsea Pinnix
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Eleanor M Osborne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jillian R Gunther
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Pamela K Allen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Zeinab Abou Yehia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Michelle Fanale
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - M Alma Rodriguez
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Nathan Fowler
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Sarah A Milgrom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Christine F Wogan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Bouthaina S Dabaja
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Hein SM, Haricharan S, Johnston AN, Toneff MJ, Reddy JP, Dong J, Bu W, Li Y. Luminal epithelial cells within the mammary gland can produce basal cells upon oncogenic stress. Oncogene 2015; 35:1461-7. [PMID: 26096929 PMCID: PMC4688047 DOI: 10.1038/onc.2015.206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2014] [Revised: 05/04/2015] [Accepted: 05/04/2015] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
In the normal mammary gland, the basal epithelium is known to be bipotent and can generate either basal or luminal cells, whereas the luminal epithelium has not been demonstrated to contribute to the basal compartment in an intact and normally developed mammary gland. It is not clear whether cellular heterogeneity within a breast tumor results from transformation of bipotent basal cells or from transformation and subsequent basal conversion of the more differentiated luminal cells. Here we used a retroviral vector to express an oncogene specifically in a small number of the mammary luminal epithelial cells and tested their potential to produce basal cells during tumorigenesis. This in-vivo lineage-tracing work demonstrates that luminal cells are capable of producing basal cells on activation of either polyoma middle T antigen or ErbB2 signaling. These findings reveal the plasticity of the luminal compartment during tumorigenesis and provide an explanation for cellular heterogeneity within a cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S M Hein
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.,Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - S Haricharan
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - A N Johnston
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - M J Toneff
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - J P Reddy
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - J Dong
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.,Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - W Bu
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.,Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Y Li
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.,Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|