1
|
Radhakrishnan H, Zhao C, Sydnor VJ, Baller EB, Cook PA, Fair DA, Giesbrecht B, Larsen B, Murtha K, Roalf DR, Rush‐Goebel S, Shinohara RT, Shou H, Tisdall MD, Vettel JM, Grafton ST, Cieslak M, Satterthwaite TD. A practical evaluation of measures derived from compressed sensing diffusion spectrum imaging. Hum Brain Mapp 2024; 45:e26580. [PMID: 38520359 PMCID: PMC10960521 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Diffusion Spectrum Imaging (DSI) using dense Cartesian sampling of q-space has been shown to provide important advantages for modeling complex white matter architecture. However, its adoption has been limited by the lengthy acquisition time required. Sparser sampling of q-space combined with compressed sensing (CS) reconstruction techniques has been proposed as a way to reduce the scan time of DSI acquisitions. However prior studies have mainly evaluated CS-DSI in post-mortem or non-human data. At present, the capacity for CS-DSI to provide accurate and reliable measures of white matter anatomy and microstructure in the living human brain remains unclear. We evaluated the accuracy and inter-scan reliability of 6 different CS-DSI schemes that provided up to 80% reductions in scan time compared to a full DSI scheme. We capitalized on a dataset of 26 participants who were scanned over eight independent sessions using a full DSI scheme. From this full DSI scheme, we subsampled images to create a range of CS-DSI images. This allowed us to compare the accuracy and inter-scan reliability of derived measures of white matter structure (bundle segmentation, voxel-wise scalar maps) produced by the CS-DSI and the full DSI schemes. We found that CS-DSI estimates of both bundle segmentations and voxel-wise scalars were nearly as accurate and reliable as those generated by the full DSI scheme. Moreover, we found that the accuracy and reliability of CS-DSI was higher in white matter bundles that were more reliably segmented by the full DSI scheme. As a final step, we replicated the accuracy of CS-DSI in a prospectively acquired dataset (n = 20, scanned once). Together, these results illustrate the utility of CS-DSI for reliably delineating in vivo white matter architecture in a fraction of the scan time, underscoring its promise for both clinical and research applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamsanandini Radhakrishnan
- Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging CenterUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Chenying Zhao
- Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging CenterUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
- Lifespan Brain Institute, Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied ScienceUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Valerie J. Sydnor
- Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging CenterUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Erica B. Baller
- Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging CenterUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Philip A. Cook
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Damien A. Fair
- Masonic Institute for the Developing BrainUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA
| | - Barry Giesbrecht
- Department of Psychological and Brain SciencesUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraCaliforniaUSA
| | - Bart Larsen
- Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging CenterUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Kristin Murtha
- Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging CenterUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - David R. Roalf
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
- Lifespan Brain Institute, Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Sage Rush‐Goebel
- Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging CenterUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Russell T. Shinohara
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and InformaticsUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing & AnalyticsUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Haochang Shou
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and InformaticsUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing & AnalyticsUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - M. Dylan Tisdall
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Jean M. Vettel
- Department of Psychological and Brain SciencesUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraCaliforniaUSA
- U.S. Army Research LaboratoryAberdeen Proving GroundAberdeenMarylandUSA
| | - Scott T. Grafton
- Department of Psychological and Brain SciencesUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraCaliforniaUSA
| | - Matthew Cieslak
- Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging CenterUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Theodore D. Satterthwaite
- Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging CenterUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shailja S, Bhagavatula V, Cieslak M, Vettel JM, Grafton ST, Manjunath BS. ReeBundle: A Method for Topological Modeling of White Matter Pathways Using Diffusion MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2023; 42:3725-3737. [PMID: 37590108 DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2023.3306049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/19/2023]
Abstract
Tractography can generate millions of complex curvilinear fibers (streamlines) in 3D that exhibit the geometry of white matter pathways in the brain. Common approaches to analyzing white matter connectivity are based on adjacency matrices that quantify connection strength but do not account for any topological information. A critical element in neurological and developmental disorders is the topological deterioration and irregularities in streamlines. In this paper, we propose a novel Reeb graph-based method "ReeBundle" that efficiently encodes the topology and geometry of white matter fibers. Given the trajectories of neuronal fiber pathways (neuroanatomical bundle), we re-bundle the streamlines by modeling their spatial evolution to capture geometrically significant events (akin to a fingerprint). ReeBundle parameters control the granularity of the model and handle the presence of improbable streamlines commonly produced by tractography. Further, we propose a new Reeb graph-based distance metric that quantifies topological differences for automated quality control and bundle comparison. We show the practical usage of our method using two datasets: (1) For International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM) dataset, ReeBundle handles the morphology of the white matter tract configurations due to branching and local ambiguities in complicated bundle tracts like anterior and posterior commissures; (2) For the longitudinal repeated measures in the Cognitive Resilience and Sleep History (CRASH) dataset, repeated scans of a given subject acquired weeks apart lead to provably similar Reeb graphs that differ significantly from other subjects, thus highlighting ReeBundle's potential for clinical fingerprinting of brain regions.
Collapse
|
3
|
Nakuci J, Wasylyshyn N, Cieslak M, Elliott JC, Bansal K, Giesbrecht B, Grafton ST, Vettel JM, Garcia JO, Muldoon SF. Within-subject reproducibility varies in multi-modal, longitudinal brain networks. Sci Rep 2023; 13:6699. [PMID: 37095180 PMCID: PMC10126005 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-33441-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 04/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Network neuroscience provides important insights into brain function by analyzing complex networks constructed from diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging (dMRI), functional MRI (fMRI) and Electro/Magnetoencephalography (E/MEG) data. However, in order to ensure that results are reproducible, we need a better understanding of within- and between-subject variability over long periods of time. Here, we analyze a longitudinal, 8 session, multi-modal (dMRI, and simultaneous EEG-fMRI), and multiple task imaging data set. We first confirm that across all modalities, within-subject reproducibility is higher than between-subject reproducibility. We see high variability in the reproducibility of individual connections, but observe that in EEG-derived networks, during both rest and task, alpha-band connectivity is consistently more reproducible than connectivity in other frequency bands. Structural networks show a higher reliability than functional networks across network statistics, but synchronizability and eigenvector centrality are consistently less reliable than other network measures across all modalities. Finally, we find that structural dMRI networks outperform functional networks in their ability to identify individuals using a fingerprinting analysis. Our results highlight that functional networks likely reflect state-dependent variability not present in structural networks, and that the type of analysis should depend on whether or not one wants to take into account state-dependent fluctuations in connectivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johan Nakuci
- Neuroscience Program, University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, NY, 14260, USA.
- School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 14260, USA.
| | - Nick Wasylyshyn
- U.S. CCDC Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Aberdeen, MD, 21005, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Matthew Cieslak
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA
| | - James C Elliott
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA
| | - Kanika Bansal
- U.S. CCDC Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Aberdeen, MD, 21005, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA
| | - Barry Giesbrecht
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA
- Institute for Collaborative Biotechnologies, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA
| | - Scott T Grafton
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA
- Institute for Collaborative Biotechnologies, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA
| | - Jean M Vettel
- U.S. CCDC Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Aberdeen, MD, 21005, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA
| | - Javier O Garcia
- U.S. CCDC Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Aberdeen, MD, 21005, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Sarah F Muldoon
- Neuroscience Program, University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, NY, 14260, USA.
- Department of Mathematics and CDSE Program, University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, NY, 14260, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bansal K, Garcia JO, Lauharatanahirun N, Muldoon SF, Sajda P, Vettel JM. Scale-specific dynamics of high-amplitude bursts in EEG capture behaviorally meaningful variability. Neuroimage 2021; 241:118425. [PMID: 34303795 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Revised: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Cascading high-amplitude bursts in neural activity, termed avalanches, are thought to provide insight into the complex spatially distributed interactions in neural systems. In human neuroimaging, for example, avalanches occurring during resting-state show scale-invariant dynamics, supporting the hypothesis that the brain operates near a critical point that enables long range spatial communication. In fact, it has been suggested that such scale-invariant dynamics, characterized by a power-law distribution in these avalanches, are universal in neural systems and emerge through a common mechanism. While the analysis of avalanches and subsequent criticality is increasingly seen as a framework for using complex systems theory to understand brain function, it is unclear how the framework would account for the omnipresent cognitive variability, whether across individuals or tasks. To address this, we analyzed avalanches in the EEG activity of healthy humans during rest as well as two distinct task conditions that varied in cognitive demands and produced behavioral measures unique to each individual. In both rest and task conditions we observed that avalanche dynamics demonstrate scale-invariant characteristics, but differ in their specific features, demonstrating individual variability. Using a new metric we call normalized engagement, which estimates the likelihood for a brain region to produce high-amplitude bursts, we also investigated regional features of avalanche dynamics. Normalized engagement showed not only the expected individual and task dependent variability, but also scale-specificity that correlated with individual behavior. Our results suggest that the study of avalanches in human brain activity provides a tool to assess cognitive variability. Our findings expand our understanding of avalanche features and are supportive of the emerging theoretical idea that the dynamics of an active human brain operate close to a critical-like region and not a singular critical-state.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kanika Bansal
- Human Research and Engineering Directorate, US DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
| | - Javier O Garcia
- Human Research and Engineering Directorate, US DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005, USA
| | - Nina Lauharatanahirun
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Department of Biobehavioral Health, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA 16802, USA
| | - Sarah F Muldoon
- Mathematics Department, CDSE Program, and Neuroscience Program, University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA
| | - Paul Sajda
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA; Data Science Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA
| | - Jean M Vettel
- Human Research and Engineering Directorate, US DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cieslak M, Cook PA, He X, Yeh FC, Dhollander T, Adebimpe A, Aguirre GK, Bassett DS, Betzel RF, Bourque J, Cabral LM, Davatzikos C, Detre JA, Earl E, Elliott MA, Fadnavis S, Fair DA, Foran W, Fotiadis P, Garyfallidis E, Giesbrecht B, Gur RC, Gur RE, Kelz MB, Keshavan A, Larsen BS, Luna B, Mackey AP, Milham MP, Oathes DJ, Perrone A, Pines AR, Roalf DR, Richie-Halford A, Rokem A, Sydnor VJ, Tapera TM, Tooley UA, Vettel JM, Yeatman JD, Grafton ST, Satterthwaite TD. QSIPrep: an integrative platform for preprocessing and reconstructing diffusion MRI data. Nat Methods 2021; 18:775-778. [PMID: 34155395 PMCID: PMC8596781 DOI: 10.1038/s41592-021-01185-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) is the primary method for noninvasively studying the organization of white matter in the human brain. Here we introduce QSIPrep, an integrative software platform for the processing of diffusion images that is compatible with nearly all dMRI sampling schemes. Drawing on a diverse set of software suites to capitalize on their complementary strengths, QSIPrep facilitates the implementation of best practices for processing of diffusion images.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Xiaosong He
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Thijs Dhollander
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - John A Detre
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Eric Earl
- Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | | | | | - Will Foran
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Ruben C Gur
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Raquel E Gur
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Max B Kelz
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Anders Perrone
- Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
- University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Adam R Pines
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Scott T Grafton
- University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tompson SH, Falk EB, O'Donnell MB, Cascio CN, Bayer JB, Vettel JM, Bassett DS. Response inhibition in adolescents is moderated by brain connectivity and social network structure. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2021; 15:827-837. [PMID: 32761131 PMCID: PMC7543938 DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsaa109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2020] [Revised: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The social environment an individual is embedded in influences their ability and motivation to engage self-control processes, but little is known about the neural mechanisms underlying this effect. Many individuals successfully regulate their behavior even when they do not show strong activation in canonical self-control brain regions. Thus, individuals may rely on other resources to compensate, including daily experiences navigating and managing complex social relationships that likely bolster self-control processes. Here, we employed a network neuroscience approach to investigate the role of social context and social brain systems in facilitating self-control in adolescents. We measured brain activation using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) as 62 adolescents completed a Go/No-Go response inhibition task. We found that self-referential brain systems compensate for weaker activation in executive function brain systems, especially for adolescents with more friends and more communities in their social networks. Collectively, our results indicate a critical role for self-referential brain systems during the developmental trajectory of self-control throughout adolescence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven H Tompson
- US Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005, USA
| | - Emily B Falk
- Annenberg School of Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.,Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.,Wharton Marketing Department, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | | | - Christopher N Cascio
- School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA
| | - Joseph B Bayer
- School of Communication, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.,Translational Data Analytics Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Jean M Vettel
- US Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005, USA.,Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.,Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA
| | - Danielle S Bassett
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.,Department of Electrical & Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.,Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.,Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.,Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Doré BP, Scholz C, Baek EC, Garcia JO, O'Donnell MB, Bassett DS, Vettel JM, Falk EB. Brain Activity Tracks Population Information Sharing by Capturing Consensus Judgments of Value. Cereb Cortex 2020; 29:3102-3110. [PMID: 30169552 DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhy176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2017] [Revised: 05/21/2018] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Information that is shared widely can profoundly shape society. Evidence from neuroimaging suggests that activity in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), a core region of the brain's valuation system tracks with this sharing. However, the mechanisms linking vmPFC responses in individuals to population behavior are still unclear. We used a multilevel brain-as-predictor approach to address this gap, finding that individual differences in how closely vmPFC activity corresponded with population news article sharing related to how closely its activity tracked with social consensus about article value. Moreover, how closely vmPFC activity corresponded with population behavior was linked to daily life news experience: frequent news readers tended to show high vmPFC across all articles, whereas infrequent readers showed high vmPFC only to articles that were more broadly valued and heavily shared. Using functional connectivity analyses, we found that superior tracking of consensus value was related to decreased connectivity of vmPFC with a dorsolateral PFC region associated with controlled processing. Taken together, our results demonstrate variability in the brain's capacity to track crowd wisdom about information value, and suggest (lower levels of) stimulus experience and vmPFC-dlPFC connectivity as psychological and neural sources of this variability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B P Doré
- Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - C Scholz
- Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - E C Baek
- Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - J O Garcia
- US Army Research Laboratory, Adelphi, MD, USA.,Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - M B O'Donnell
- Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - D S Bassett
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA.,Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA.,Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA.,Department of Electrical & Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - J M Vettel
- US Army Research Laboratory, Adelphi, MD, USA.,Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA.,Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA.,Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA
| | - E B Falk
- Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Schmälzle R, Cooper N, O’Donnell MB, Tompson S, Lee S, Cantrell J, Vettel JM, Falk EB. The Effectiveness of Online Messages for Promoting Smoking Cessation Resources: Predicting Nationwide Campaign Effects From Neural Responses in the EX Campaign. Front Hum Neurosci 2020; 14:565772. [PMID: 33100997 PMCID: PMC7546826 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.565772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
What are the key ingredients that make some persuasive messages resonate with audiences and elicit action, while others fail? Billions of dollars per year are put towards changing human behavior, but it is difficult to know which messages will be the most persuasive in the field. By combining novel neuroimaging techniques and large-scale online data, we examine the role of key health communication variables relevant to motivating action at scale. We exposed a sample of smokers to anti-smoking web-banner messages from a real-world campaign while measuring message-evoked brain response patterns via fMRI, and we also obtained subjective evaluations of each banner. Neural indices were derived based on: (i) message-evoked activity in specific brain regions; and (ii) spatially distributed response patterns, both selected based on prior research and theoretical considerations. Next, we connected the neural and subjective data with an independent, objective outcome of message success, which is the per-banner click-through rate in the real-world campaign. Results show that messages evoking brain responses more similar to signatures of negative emotion and vividness had lower online click-through-rates. This strategy helps to connect and integrate the rapidly growing body of knowledge about brain function with formative research and outcome evaluation of health campaigns, and could ultimately further disease prevention efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ralf Schmälzle
- Department of Communication, College of Communication Arts and Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States
| | - Nicole Cooper
- Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Adelphi, MD, United States
| | - Matthew Brook O’Donnell
- Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Steven Tompson
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Adelphi, MD, United States
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Sangil Lee
- Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Jennifer Cantrell
- New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, United States
| | - Jean M. Vettel
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Adelphi, MD, United States
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, United States
| | - Emily B. Falk
- Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
- Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
- Wharton Marketing Department, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Garcia JO, Ashourvan A, Thurman SM, Srinivasan R, Bassett DS, Vettel JM. Reconfigurations within resonating communities of brain regions following TMS reveal different scales of processing. Netw Neurosci 2020; 4:611-636. [PMID: 32885118 PMCID: PMC7462427 DOI: 10.1162/netn_a_00139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2019] [Accepted: 03/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
An overarching goal of neuroscience research is to understand how heterogeneous neuronal ensembles cohere into networks of coordinated activity to support cognition. To investigate how local activity harmonizes with global signals, we measured electroencephalography (EEG) while single pulses of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) perturbed occipital and parietal cortices. We estimate the rapid network reconfigurations in dynamic network communities within specific frequency bands of the EEG, and characterize two distinct features of network reconfiguration, flexibility and allegiance, among spatially distributed neural sources following TMS. Using distance from the stimulation site to infer local and global effects, we find that alpha activity (8–12 Hz) reflects concurrent local and global effects on network dynamics. Pairwise allegiance of brain regions to communities on average increased near the stimulation site, whereas TMS-induced changes to flexibility were generally invariant to distance and stimulation site. In contrast, communities within the beta (13–20 Hz) band demonstrated a high level of spatial specificity, particularly within a cluster comprising paracentral areas. Together, these results suggest that focal magnetic neurostimulation to distinct cortical sites can help identify both local and global effects on brain network dynamics, and highlight fundamental differences in the manifestation of network reconfigurations within alpha and beta frequency bands. TMS may be used to probe the causal link between local regional activity and global brain dynamics. Using simultaneous TMS-EEG and dynamic community detection, we introduce what we call “resonating communities” or frequency band-specific clusters in the brain, as a way to index local and global processing. These resonating communities within the alpha and beta bands display both global (or integrating) behavior and local specificity, highlighting fundamental differences in the manifestation of network reconfigurations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier O Garcia
- U.S. Army CCDC Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA
| | - Arian Ashourvan
- U.S. Army CCDC Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA
| | - Steven M Thurman
- U.S. Army CCDC Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA
| | - Ramesh Srinivasan
- Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Danielle S Bassett
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jean M Vettel
- U.S. Army CCDC Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Stiso J, Corsi MC, Vettel JM, Garcia J, Pasqualetti F, De Vico Fallani F, Lucas TH, Bassett DS. Learning in brain-computer interface control evidenced by joint decomposition of brain and behavior. J Neural Eng 2020; 17:046018. [PMID: 32369802 PMCID: PMC7734596 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab9064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Motor imagery-based brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) use an individual's ability to volitionally modulate localized brain activity, often as a therapy for motor dysfunction or to probe causal relations between brain activity and behavior. However, many individuals cannot learn to successfully modulate their brain activity, greatly limiting the efficacy of BCI for therapy and for basic scientific inquiry. Formal experiments designed to probe the nature of BCI learning have offered initial evidence that coherent activity across spatially distributed and functionally diverse cognitive systems is a hallmark of individuals who can successfully learn to control the BCI. However, little is known about how these distributed networks interact through time to support learning. APPROACH Here, we address this gap in knowledge by constructing and applying a multimodal network approach to decipher brain-behavior relations in motor imagery-based brain-computer interface learning using magnetoencephalography. Specifically, we employ a minimally constrained matrix decomposition method - non-negative matrix factorization - to simultaneously identify regularized, covarying subgraphs of functional connectivity, to assess their similarity to task performance, and to detect their time-varying expression. MAIN RESULTS We find that learning is marked by diffuse brain-behavior relations: good learners displayed many subgraphs whose temporal expression tracked performance. Individuals also displayed marked variation in the spatial properties of subgraphs such as the connectivity between the frontal lobe and the rest of the brain, and in the temporal properties of subgraphs such as the stage of learning at which they reached maximum expression. From these observations, we posit a conceptual model in which certain subgraphs support learning by modulating brain activity in sensors near regions important for sustaining attention. To test this model, we use tools that stipulate regional dynamics on a networked system (network control theory), and find that good learners display a single subgraph whose temporal expression tracked performance and whose architecture supports easy modulation of sensors located near brain regions important for attention. SIGNIFICANCE The nature of our contribution to the neuroscience of BCI learning is therefore both computational and theoretical; we first use a minimally-constrained, individual specific method of identifying mesoscale structure in dynamic brain activity to show how global connectivity and interactions between distributed networks supports BCI learning, and then we use a formal network model of control to lend theoretical support to the hypothesis that these identified subgraphs are well suited to modulate attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Stiso
- Neuroscience Graduate Group, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering & Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Marie-Constance Corsi
- Inria Paris, Aramis project-team, F-75013, Paris, France
- Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Epinire, ICM, Inserm, U 1127, CNRS, UMR 7225, Sorbonne Universit, F-75013, Paris, France
| | - Jean M. Vettel
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering & Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Human Research & Engineering Directorate, US CCDC Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen, MD, USA
- Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| | - Javier Garcia
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering & Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Human Research & Engineering Directorate, US CCDC Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen, MD, USA
| | - Fabio Pasqualetti
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521
| | - Fabrizio De Vico Fallani
- Inria Paris, Aramis project-team, F-75013, Paris, France
- Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Epinire, ICM, Inserm, U 1127, CNRS, UMR 7225, Sorbonne Universit, F-75013, Paris, France
| | - Timothy H. Lucas
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Danielle S. Bassett
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering & Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Electrical & Systems Engineering, School of Engineering & Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Physics & Astronomy, College of Arts & Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- The Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Botvinik-Nezer R, Holzmeister F, Camerer CF, Dreber A, Huber J, Johannesson M, Kirchler M, Iwanir R, Mumford JA, Adcock RA, Avesani P, Baczkowski BM, Bajracharya A, Bakst L, Ball S, Barilari M, Bault N, Beaton D, Beitner J, Benoit RG, Berkers RMWJ, Bhanji JP, Biswal BB, Bobadilla-Suarez S, Bortolini T, Bottenhorn KL, Bowring A, Braem S, Brooks HR, Brudner EG, Calderon CB, Camilleri JA, Castrellon JJ, Cecchetti L, Cieslik EC, Cole ZJ, Collignon O, Cox RW, Cunningham WA, Czoschke S, Dadi K, Davis CP, Luca AD, Delgado MR, Demetriou L, Dennison JB, Di X, Dickie EW, Dobryakova E, Donnat CL, Dukart J, Duncan NW, Durnez J, Eed A, Eickhoff SB, Erhart A, Fontanesi L, Fricke GM, Fu S, Galván A, Gau R, Genon S, Glatard T, Glerean E, Goeman JJ, Golowin SAE, González-García C, Gorgolewski KJ, Grady CL, Green MA, Guassi Moreira JF, Guest O, Hakimi S, Hamilton JP, Hancock R, Handjaras G, Harry BB, Hawco C, Herholz P, Herman G, Heunis S, Hoffstaedter F, Hogeveen J, Holmes S, Hu CP, Huettel SA, Hughes ME, Iacovella V, Iordan AD, Isager PM, Isik AI, Jahn A, Johnson MR, Johnstone T, Joseph MJE, Juliano AC, Kable JW, Kassinopoulos M, Koba C, Kong XZ, Koscik TR, Kucukboyaci NE, Kuhl BA, Kupek S, Laird AR, Lamm C, Langner R, Lauharatanahirun N, Lee H, Lee S, Leemans A, Leo A, Lesage E, Li F, Li MYC, Lim PC, Lintz EN, Liphardt SW, Losecaat Vermeer AB, Love BC, Mack ML, Malpica N, Marins T, Maumet C, McDonald K, McGuire JT, Melero H, Méndez Leal AS, Meyer B, Meyer KN, Mihai G, Mitsis GD, Moll J, Nielson DM, Nilsonne G, Notter MP, Olivetti E, Onicas AI, Papale P, Patil KR, Peelle JE, Pérez A, Pischedda D, Poline JB, Prystauka Y, Ray S, Reuter-Lorenz PA, Reynolds RC, Ricciardi E, Rieck JR, Rodriguez-Thompson AM, Romyn A, Salo T, Samanez-Larkin GR, Sanz-Morales E, Schlichting ML, Schultz DH, Shen Q, Sheridan MA, Silvers JA, Skagerlund K, Smith A, Smith DV, Sokol-Hessner P, Steinkamp SR, Tashjian SM, Thirion B, Thorp JN, Tinghög G, Tisdall L, Tompson SH, Toro-Serey C, Torre Tresols JJ, Tozzi L, Truong V, Turella L, van 't Veer AE, Verguts T, Vettel JM, Vijayarajah S, Vo K, Wall MB, Weeda WD, Weis S, White DJ, Wisniewski D, Xifra-Porxas A, Yearling EA, Yoon S, Yuan R, Yuen KSL, Zhang L, Zhang X, Zosky JE, Nichols TE, Poldrack RA, Schonberg T. Variability in the analysis of a single neuroimaging dataset by many teams. Nature 2020; 582:84-88. [PMID: 32483374 PMCID: PMC7771346 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2314-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 423] [Impact Index Per Article: 105.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2019] [Accepted: 04/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Data analysis workflows in many scientific domains have become increasingly complex and flexible. Here we assess the effect of this flexibility on the results of functional magnetic resonance imaging by asking 70 independent teams to analyse the same dataset, testing the same 9 ex-ante hypotheses1. The flexibility of analytical approaches is exemplified by the fact that no two teams chose identical workflows to analyse the data. This flexibility resulted in sizeable variation in the results of hypothesis tests, even for teams whose statistical maps were highly correlated at intermediate stages of the analysis pipeline. Variation in reported results was related to several aspects of analysis methodology. Notably, a meta-analytical approach that aggregated information across teams yielded a significant consensus in activated regions. Furthermore, prediction markets of researchers in the field revealed an overestimation of the likelihood of significant findings, even by researchers with direct knowledge of the dataset2-5. Our findings show that analytical flexibility can have substantial effects on scientific conclusions, and identify factors that may be related to variability in the analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging. The results emphasize the importance of validating and sharing complex analysis workflows, and demonstrate the need for performing and reporting multiple analyses of the same data. Potential approaches that could be used to mitigate issues related to analytical variability are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rotem Botvinik-Nezer
- Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Department of Neurobiology, The George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Felix Holzmeister
- Department of Banking and Finance, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Colin F Camerer
- HSS and CNS, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Anna Dreber
- Department of Economics, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Economics, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Juergen Huber
- Department of Banking and Finance, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Magnus Johannesson
- Department of Economics, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Michael Kirchler
- Department of Banking and Finance, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Roni Iwanir
- Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Department of Neurobiology, The George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Jeanette A Mumford
- Center for Healthy Minds, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - R Alison Adcock
- Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Paolo Avesani
- Neuroinformatics Laboratory, Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Trento, Italy
- Center for Mind/Brain Sciences - CIMeC, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy
| | - Blazej M Baczkowski
- Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Aahana Bajracharya
- Department of Otolaryngology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Leah Bakst
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Systems Neuroscience, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sheryl Ball
- Department of Economics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
- School of Neuroscience, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - Marco Barilari
- Crossmodal Perception and Plasticity Laboratory, Institutes for Research in Psychology (IPSY) and Neurosciences (IoNS), UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Nadège Bault
- School of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Derek Beaton
- Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Julia Beitner
- Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychology, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Roland G Benoit
- Max Planck Research Group: Adaptive Memory, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Ruud M W J Berkers
- Max Planck Research Group: Adaptive Memory, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Jamil P Bhanji
- Department of Psychology, Rutgers University-Newark, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Bharat B Biswal
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, USA
- School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | | | - Tiago Bortolini
- D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Alexander Bowring
- Oxford Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Senne Braem
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Hayley R Brooks
- Department of Psychology, University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Emily G Brudner
- Department of Psychology, Rutgers University-Newark, Newark, NJ, USA
| | | | - Julia A Camilleri
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Jaime J Castrellon
- Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Luca Cecchetti
- MoMiLab Research Unit, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca, Italy
| | - Edna C Cieslik
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Zachary J Cole
- Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
| | - Olivier Collignon
- Center for Mind/Brain Sciences - CIMeC, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy
- Crossmodal Perception and Plasticity Laboratory, Institutes for Research in Psychology (IPSY) and Neurosciences (IoNS), UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Robert W Cox
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Stefan Czoschke
- Institute of Medical Psychology, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | | | - Charles P Davis
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Brain Imaging Research Center, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Connecticut Institute for the Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Alberto De Luca
- PROVIDI Lab, Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Lysia Demetriou
- Section of Endocrinology and Investigative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Xin Di
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, USA
- School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Erin W Dickie
- Krembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ekaterina Dobryakova
- Center for Traumatic Brain Injury Research, Kessler Foundation, East Hanover, NJ, USA
| | - Claire L Donnat
- Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Juergen Dukart
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Niall W Duncan
- Graduate Institute of Mind, Brain and Consciousness, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Brain and Consciousness Research Centre, TMU-ShuangHo Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Joke Durnez
- Department of Psychology and Stanford Center for Reproducible Neuroscience, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Amr Eed
- Instituto de Neurociencias, CSIC-UMH, Alicante, Spain
| | - Simon B Eickhoff
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Andrew Erhart
- Department of Psychology, University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Laura Fontanesi
- Faculty of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - G Matthew Fricke
- Computer Science Department, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Shiguang Fu
- School of Management, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Neuromanagement, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China
| | - Adriana Galván
- Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Remi Gau
- Crossmodal Perception and Plasticity Laboratory, Institutes for Research in Psychology (IPSY) and Neurosciences (IoNS), UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Sarah Genon
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Tristan Glatard
- Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Enrico Glerean
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland
| | - Jelle J Goeman
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sergej A E Golowin
- Graduate Institute of Mind, Brain and Consciousness, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | | | - Cheryl L Grady
- Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mikella A Green
- Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - João F Guassi Moreira
- Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Olivia Guest
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, London, UK
- Research Centre on Interactive Media, Smart Systems and Emerging Technologies - RISE, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Shabnam Hakimi
- Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - J Paul Hamilton
- Center for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Roeland Hancock
- Brain Imaging Research Center, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Connecticut Institute for the Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Giacomo Handjaras
- MoMiLab Research Unit, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca, Italy
| | - Bronson B Harry
- The MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Colin Hawco
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Peer Herholz
- McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, The Neuro (Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital), Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Gabrielle Herman
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephan Heunis
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Research and Development, Epilepsy Centre Kempenhaeghe, Heeze, The Netherlands
| | - Felix Hoffstaedter
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Jeremy Hogeveen
- Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
- Psychology Clinical Neuroscience Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Susan Holmes
- Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Chuan-Peng Hu
- Leibniz-Institut für Resilienzforschung (LIR), Mainz, Germany
| | - Scott A Huettel
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Matthew E Hughes
- School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia
| | - Vittorio Iacovella
- Center for Mind/Brain Sciences - CIMeC, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy
| | | | - Peder M Isager
- Department of Industrial Engineering and Innovation Sciences, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Ayse I Isik
- Department of Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Andrew Jahn
- fMRI Laboratory, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Matthew R Johnson
- Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
- Center for Brain, Biology and Behavior, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
| | - Tom Johnstone
- School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael J E Joseph
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anthony C Juliano
- Center for Neuropsychology and Neuroscience Research, Kessler Foundation, East Hanover, NJ, USA
| | - Joseph W Kable
- Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- MindCORE, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michalis Kassinopoulos
- Graduate Program in Biological and Biomedical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Cemal Koba
- MoMiLab Research Unit, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca, Italy
| | - Xiang-Zhen Kong
- Language and Genetics Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Timothy R Koscik
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Nuri Erkut Kucukboyaci
- Center for Traumatic Brain Injury Research, Kessler Foundation, East Hanover, NJ, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Brice A Kuhl
- Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA
| | - Sebastian Kupek
- Faculty of Economics and Statistics, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Angela R Laird
- Department of Physics, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Claus Lamm
- Department of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Vienna Cognitive Science Hub, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Robert Langner
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Nina Lauharatanahirun
- US CCDC Army Research Laboratory, Human Research and Engineering Directorate, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA
- Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Hongmi Lee
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sangil Lee
- Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Alexander Leemans
- PROVIDI Lab, Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Andrea Leo
- MoMiLab Research Unit, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca, Italy
| | - Elise Lesage
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Flora Li
- Fralin Biomedical Research Institute, Roanoke, VA, USA
- Economics Experimental Lab, Nanjing Audit University, Nanjing, China
| | - Monica Y C Li
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Brain Imaging Research Center, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Connecticut Institute for the Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Phui Cheng Lim
- Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
- Center for Brain, Biology and Behavior, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
| | - Evan N Lintz
- Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
| | | | - Annabel B Losecaat Vermeer
- Department of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Bradley C Love
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, London, UK
- The Alan Turing Institute, London, UK
| | - Michael L Mack
- Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Norberto Malpica
- Laboratorio de Análisis de Imagen Médica y Biometría (LAIMBIO), Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Theo Marins
- D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Camille Maumet
- Inria, Univ Rennes, CNRS, Inserm, IRISA UMR 6074, Empenn ERL U 1228, Rennes, France
| | - Kelsey McDonald
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Joseph T McGuire
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Systems Neuroscience, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Helena Melero
- Laboratorio de Análisis de Imagen Médica y Biometría (LAIMBIO), Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain
- Departamento de Psicobiología, División de Psicología, CES Cardenal Cisneros, Madrid, Spain
- Northeastern University Biomedical Imaging Center, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Adriana S Méndez Leal
- Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Benjamin Meyer
- Leibniz-Institut für Resilienzforschung (LIR), Mainz, Germany
- Neuroimaging Center (NIC), Focus Program Translational Neurosciences (FTN), Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Kristin N Meyer
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Glad Mihai
- Max Planck Research Group: Neural Mechanisms of Human Communication, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
- Chair of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Georgios D Mitsis
- Department of Bioengineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jorge Moll
- D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Dylan M Nielson
- Data Science and Sharing Team, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Gustav Nilsonne
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Michael P Notter
- The Laboratory for Investigative Neurophysiology (The LINE), Department of Radiology, University Hospital Center and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Emanuele Olivetti
- Neuroinformatics Laboratory, Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Trento, Italy
- Center for Mind/Brain Sciences - CIMeC, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy
| | - Adrian I Onicas
- MoMiLab Research Unit, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca, Italy
| | - Paolo Papale
- MoMiLab Research Unit, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca, Italy
- Department of Vision and Cognition, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kaustubh R Patil
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Jonathan E Peelle
- Department of Otolaryngology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Alexandre Pérez
- McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, The Neuro (Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital), Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Doris Pischedda
- Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience and Berlin Center for Advanced Neuroimaging and Clinic for Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence Science of Intelligence, Technische Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- NeuroMI - Milan Center for Neuroscience, Milan, Italy
| | - Jean-Baptiste Poline
- McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, The Neuro (Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital), Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Henry H. Wheeler, Jr. Brain Imaging Center, Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Yanina Prystauka
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Brain Imaging Research Center, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Connecticut Institute for the Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Shruti Ray
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, USA
| | | | - Richard C Reynolds
- Scientific and Statistical Computing Core, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Emiliano Ricciardi
- MoMiLab Research Unit, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca, Italy
| | - Jenny R Rieck
- Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anais M Rodriguez-Thompson
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Anthony Romyn
- Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Taylor Salo
- Department of Psychology, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Gregory R Samanez-Larkin
- Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Emilio Sanz-Morales
- Laboratorio de Análisis de Imagen Médica y Biometría (LAIMBIO), Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Douglas H Schultz
- Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
- Center for Brain, Biology and Behavior, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
| | - Qiang Shen
- School of Management, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Neuromanagement, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China
| | - Margaret A Sheridan
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jennifer A Silvers
- Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kenny Skagerlund
- Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Center for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Alec Smith
- Department of Economics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
- School of Neuroscience, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - David V Smith
- Department of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Simon R Steinkamp
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience (INM-3), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - Sarah M Tashjian
- Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - John N Thorp
- Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gustav Tinghög
- Department of Management and Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Loreen Tisdall
- Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Center for Cognitive and Decision Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Steven H Tompson
- US CCDC Army Research Laboratory, Human Research and Engineering Directorate, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA
| | - Claudio Toro-Serey
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Systems Neuroscience, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Leonardo Tozzi
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Vuong Truong
- Graduate Institute of Mind, Brain and Consciousness, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Brain and Consciousness Research Centre, TMU-ShuangHo Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Luca Turella
- Center for Mind/Brain Sciences - CIMeC, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy
| | - Anna E van 't Veer
- Methodology and Statistics Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Tom Verguts
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Jean M Vettel
- US Combat Capabilities Development Command Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen, MD, USA
- University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sagana Vijayarajah
- Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Khoi Vo
- Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Matthew B Wall
- Invicro, London, UK
- Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Clinical Psychopharmacology Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Wouter D Weeda
- Methodology and Statistics Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Susanne Weis
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - David J White
- Centre for Human Psychopharmacology, Swinburne University, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia
| | - David Wisniewski
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Alba Xifra-Porxas
- Graduate Program in Biological and Biomedical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Emily A Yearling
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Brain Imaging Research Center, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Connecticut Institute for the Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Sangsuk Yoon
- Department of Management and Marketing, School of Business, University of Dayton, Dayton, OH, USA
| | - Rui Yuan
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Kenneth S L Yuen
- Leibniz-Institut für Resilienzforschung (LIR), Mainz, Germany
- Neuroimaging Center (NIC), Focus Program Translational Neurosciences (FTN), Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Lei Zhang
- Department of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Xu Zhang
- Brain Imaging Research Center, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Connecticut Institute for the Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Biomedical Engineering Department, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Joshua E Zosky
- Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
- Center for Brain, Biology and Behavior, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
| | - Thomas E Nichols
- Oxford Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | | | - Tom Schonberg
- Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
- Department of Neurobiology, The George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pei R, Lauharatanahirun N, Cascio CN, O'Donnell MB, Shope JT, Simons-Morton BG, Vettel JM, Falk EB. Neural processes during adolescent risky decision making are associated with conformity to peer influence. Dev Cogn Neurosci 2020; 44:100794. [PMID: 32716849 PMCID: PMC7281781 DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2020.100794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2019] [Revised: 03/12/2020] [Accepted: 05/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Adolescents’ neural responses to risky decisions may modulate their conformity to different types of peer influence. Neural activity in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) predicted conformity to risky peers while driving. Connectivity between VS and risk processing regions (including insula and ACC) predicted safer driving under risky influence.
Adolescents demonstrate both heightened sensitivity to peer influence and increased risk-taking. The current study provides a novel test of how these two phenomena are related at behavioral and neural levels. Adolescent males (N = 83, 16–17 years) completed the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) in an fMRI scanner. One week later, participants completed a driving task in which they drove alone and with a safety- or risk-promoting peer passenger. Results showed that neural responses during BART were associated with participants’ behavioral conformity to safe vs. risky peer influence while later driving. First, the extent that neural activation in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) scaled with decision stakes in BART was associated with conformity to risky peer influence. Additionally, stake-modulated functional connectivity between ventral striatum (VS) and risk processing regions (including ACC and insula) was associated with safer driving under risky peer influence (i.e. resistance to risky peer influence), suggesting that connectivity between VS and ACC as well as insula may serve a protective role under risky peer influence. Together, these results suggest that adolescents’ neural responses to risky decision making may modulate their behavioral conformity to different types of peer influence on risk taking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Pei
- Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Nina Lauharatanahirun
- Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA
| | - Christopher N Cascio
- School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Matthew B O'Donnell
- Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jean T Shope
- Transportation Research Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Bruce G Simons-Morton
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jean M Vettel
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA
| | - Emily B Falk
- Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tompson SH, Kahn AE, Falk EB, Vettel JM, Bassett DS. Functional brain network architecture supporting the learning of social networks in humans. Neuroimage 2020; 210:116498. [PMID: 31917325 PMCID: PMC8740914 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2019] [Revised: 12/23/2019] [Accepted: 12/24/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Most humans have the good fortune to live their lives embedded in richly structured social groups. Yet, it remains unclear how humans acquire knowledge about these social structures to successfully navigate social relationships. Here we address this knowledge gap with an interdisciplinary neuroimaging study drawing on recent advances in network science and statistical learning. Specifically, we collected BOLD MRI data while participants learned the community structure of both social and non-social networks, in order to examine whether the learning of these two types of networks was differentially associated with functional brain network topology. We found that participants learned the community structure of the networks, as evidenced by a slower reaction time when a trial moved between communities than when a trial moved within a community. Learning the community structure of social networks was also characterized by significantly greater functional connectivity of the hippocampus and temporoparietal junction when transitioning between communities than when transitioning within a community. Furthermore, temporoparietal regions of the default mode were more strongly connected to hippocampus, somatomotor, and visual regions for social networks than for non-social networks. Collectively, our results identify neurophysiological underpinnings of social versus non-social network learning, extending our knowledge about the impact of social context on learning processes. More broadly, this work offers an empirical approach to study the learning of social network structures, which could be fruitfully extended to other participant populations, various graph architectures, and a diversity of social contexts in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven H Tompson
- Human Sciences Campaign, U.S. Combat Capabilities Development Center Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen, MD, 21005, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Ari E Kahn
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Department of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Emily B Falk
- Annenberg School of Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Marketing Department, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Jean M Vettel
- Human Sciences Campaign, U.S. Combat Capabilities Development Center Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen, MD, 21005, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA
| | - Danielle S Bassett
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Department of Electrical & Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM, 87501, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ashourvan A, Pequito S, Khambhati AN, Mikhail F, Baldassano SN, Davis KA, Lucas TH, Vettel JM, Litt B, Pappas GJ, Bassett DS. Model-based design for seizure control by stimulation. J Neural Eng 2020; 17:026009. [PMID: 32103826 PMCID: PMC8341467 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab7a4e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Current brain stimulation paradigms are largely empirical rather than theoretical. An opportunity exists to improve upon their modest effectiveness in closed-loop control strategies with the development of theoretically grounded, model-based designs. APPROACH Inspired by this need, here we couple experimental data and mathematical modeling with a control-theoretic strategy for seizure termination. We begin by exercising a dynamical systems approach to model seizures (n = 94) recorded using intracranial EEG (iEEG) from 21 patients with medication-resistant, localization-related epilepsy. MAIN RESULTS Although each patient's seizures displayed unique spatial and temporal patterns, their evolution can be parsimoniously characterized by the same model form. Idiosyncracies of the model can inform individualized intervention strategies, specifically in iEEG samples with well-localized seizure onset zones. Temporal fluctuations in the spatial profiles of the oscillatory modes show that seizure onset marks a transition into a regime in which the underlying system supports prolonged rhythmic and focal activity. Based on these observations, we propose a control-theoretic strategy that aims to stabilize ictal activity using static output feedback for linear time-invariant switching systems. Finally, we demonstrate in silico that our proposed strategy allows us to dampen the emerging focal oscillatory sources using only a small set of electrodes. SIGNIFICANCE Our integrative study informs the development of modulation and control algorithms for neurostimulation that could improve the effectiveness of implantable, closed-loop anti-epileptic devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arian Ashourvan
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America. U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005, United States of America
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Cohen Hoffing RA, Lauharatanahirun N, Forster DE, Garcia JO, Vettel JM, Thurman SM. Dissociable mappings of tonic and phasic pupillary features onto cognitive processes involved in mental arithmetic. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0230517. [PMID: 32203562 PMCID: PMC7089555 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2019] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Pupil size modulations have been used for decades as a window into the mind, and several pupillary features have been implicated in a variety of cognitive processes. Thus, a general challenge facing the field of pupillometry has been understanding which pupil features should be most relevant for explaining behavior in a given task domain. In the present study, a longitudinal design was employed where participants completed 8 biweekly sessions of a classic mental arithmetic task for the purposes of teasing apart the relationships between tonic/phasic pupil features (baseline, peak amplitude, peak latency) and two task-related cognitive processes including mental processing load (indexed by math question difficulty) and decision making (indexed by response times). We used multi-level modeling to account for individual variation while identifying pupil-to-behavior relationships at the single-trial and between-session levels. We show a dissociation between phasic and tonic features with peak amplitude and latency (but not baseline) driven by ongoing task-related processing, whereas baseline was driven by state-level effects that changed over a longer time period (i.e. weeks). Finally, we report a dissociation between peak amplitude and latency whereby amplitude reflected surprise and processing load, and latency reflected decision making times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Russell A. Cohen Hoffing
- U.S. Combat Capabilities Development Command Army Research Laboratory, Human Research and Engineering Division, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Nina Lauharatanahirun
- U.S. Combat Capabilities Development Command Army Research Laboratory, Human Research and Engineering Division, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, United States of America
- Annenberg School of Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Daniel E. Forster
- U.S. Combat Capabilities Development Command Army Research Laboratory, Human Research and Engineering Division, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Javier O. Garcia
- U.S. Combat Capabilities Development Command Army Research Laboratory, Human Research and Engineering Division, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, United States of America
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Jean M. Vettel
- U.S. Combat Capabilities Development Command Army Research Laboratory, Human Research and Engineering Division, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, United States of America
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America
| | - Steven M. Thurman
- U.S. Combat Capabilities Development Command Army Research Laboratory, Human Research and Engineering Division, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hoffing RAC, Thurman SM, Lauharatanahirun N, Forster DE, Garcia JO, Wasylyshyn N, Gies-brecht B, Grafton ST, Vettel JM. Distinct pupil features correlate with between-participant and across-session performance variability in a 16-week, longitudinal data set. J Vis 2019. [DOI: 10.1167/19.10.126c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Steven M Thurman
- Human and Research Engineering Directorate, US Army Research Laboratory
| | - Nina Lauharatanahirun
- Human and Research Engineering Directorate, US Army Research Laboratory
- Annenberg School of Communication, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Daniel E Forster
- Human and Research Engineering Directorate, US Army Research Laboratory
| | - Javier O Garcia
- Human and Research Engineering Directorate, US Army Research Laboratory
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Nick Wasylyshyn
- Human and Research Engineering Directorate, US Army Research Laboratory
| | - Barry Gies-brecht
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara
| | - Scott T Grafton
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara
| | - Jean M Vettel
- Human and Research Engineering Directorate, US Army Research Laboratory
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Thurman SM, Hoffing RAC, Lauharatanahirum N, Forster DE, Bansal K, Grafton ST, Giesbrecht B, Vettel JM. Applying linear additive models to isolate component processes in task-evoked pupil responses. J Vis 2019. [DOI: 10.1167/19.10.305c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Steven M Thurman
- Human Research and Engineering Directorate, US Army Research Laboratory
| | | | - Nina Lauharatanahirum
- Human Research and Engineering Directorate, US Army Research Laboratory
- Annenberg School of Communication, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Daniel E Forster
- Human Research and Engineering Directorate, US Army Research Laboratory
| | - Kanika Bansal
- Human Research and Engineering Directorate, US Army Research Laboratory
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University
| | - Scott T Grafton
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara
| | - Barry Giesbrecht
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara
| | - Jean M Vettel
- Human Research and Engineering Directorate, US Army Research Laboratory
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mitchell BA, Lauharatanahirun N, Garcia JO, Wymbs N, Grafton S, Vettel JM, Petzold LR. A Minimum Free Energy Model of Motor Learning. Neural Comput 2019; 31:1945-1963. [PMID: 31393824 DOI: 10.1162/neco_a_01219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Even highly trained behaviors demonstrate variability, which is correlated with performance on current and future tasks. An objective of motor learning that is general enough to explain these phenomena has not been precisely formulated. In this six-week longitudinal learning study, participants practiced a set of motor sequences each day, and neuroimaging data were collected on days 1, 14, 28, and 42 to capture the neural correlates of the learning process. In our analysis, we first modeled the underlying neural and behavioral dynamics during learning. Our results demonstrate that the densities of whole-brain response, task-active regional response, and behavioral performance evolve according to a Fokker-Planck equation during the acquisition of a motor skill. We show that this implies that the brain concurrently optimizes the entropy of a joint density over neural response and behavior (as measured by sampling over multiple trials and subjects) and the expected performance under this density; we call this formulation of learning minimum free energy learning (MFEL). This model provides an explanation as to how behavioral variability can be tuned while simultaneously improving performance during learning. We then develop a novel variant of inverse reinforcement learning to retrieve the cost function optimized by the brain during the learning process, as well as the parameter used to tune variability. We show that this population-level analysis can be used to derive a learning objective that each subject optimizes during his or her study. In this way, MFEL effectively acts as a unifying principle, allowing users to precisely formulate learning objectives and infer their structure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B A Mitchell
- Department of Computer Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 931056, U.S.A.
| | - N Lauharatanahirun
- Human Research and Engineering Directorate, The CCDC Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005, U.S.A., and Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, U.S.A.
| | - J O Garcia
- Human Research and Engineering Directorate, The CCDC Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005, U.S.A., and Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, U.S.A.
| | - N Wymbs
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, MD 21205, U.S.A.
| | - S Grafton
- Department of Psychological Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 931056, U.S.A.
| | - J M Vettel
- Department of Psychological Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 931056, U.S.A.; Human Research and Engineering Directorate, The CCDC Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005, U.S.A.; and Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, U.S.A.
| | - L R Petzold
- Department of Computer Science and Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 931056, U.S.A.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bansal K, Garcia JO, Tompson SH, Verstynen T, Vettel JM, Muldoon SF. Cognitive chimera states in human brain networks. Sci Adv 2019; 5:eaau8535. [PMID: 30949576 PMCID: PMC6447382 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aau8535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2018] [Accepted: 02/13/2019] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
The human brain is a complex dynamical system, and how cognition emerges from spatiotemporal patterns of regional brain activity remains an open question. As different regions dynamically interact to perform cognitive tasks, variable patterns of partial synchrony can be observed, forming chimera states. We propose that the spatial patterning of these states plays a fundamental role in the cognitive organization of the brain and present a cognitively informed, chimera-based framework to explore how large-scale brain architecture affects brain dynamics and function. Using personalized brain network models, we systematically study how regional brain stimulation produces different patterns of synchronization across predefined cognitive systems. We analyze these emergent patterns within our framework to understand the impact of subject-specific and region-specific structural variability on brain dynamics. Our results suggest a classification of cognitive systems into four groups with differing levels of subject and regional variability that reflect their different functional roles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kanika Bansal
- Human Research and Engineering Directorate, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA
- Mathematics Department, University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA
| | - Javier O. Garcia
- Human Research and Engineering Directorate, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Steven H. Tompson
- Human Research and Engineering Directorate, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Timothy Verstynen
- Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | - Jean M. Vettel
- Human Research and Engineering Directorate, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA
| | - Sarah F. Muldoon
- Mathematics Department, University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA
- CDSE Program and Neuroscience Program, University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Roy H, Wasylyshyn N, Spangler DP, Gamble KR, Patton D, Brooks JR, Garcia JO, Vettel JM. Linking Emotional Reactivity Between Laboratory Tasks and Immersive Environments Using Behavior and Physiology. Front Hum Neurosci 2019; 13:54. [PMID: 30833895 PMCID: PMC6387949 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2018] [Accepted: 01/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
An event or experience can induce different emotional responses between individuals, including strong variability based on task parameters or environmental context. Physiological correlates of emotional reactivity, as well as related constructs of stress and anxiety, have been found across many physiological metrics, including heart rate and brain activity. However, the interdependances and interactions across contexts and between physiological systems are not well understood. Here, we recruited military and law enforcement to complete two experimental sessions across two different days. In the laboratory session, participants viewed high-arousal negative images while brain activity electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded from the scalp, and functional connectivity was computed during the task and used as a predictor of emotional response during the other experimental session. In an immersive simulation session, participants performed a shoot-don't-shoot scenario while heart rate electrocardiography (ECG) was recorded. Our analysis examined the relationship between the sessions, including behavioral responses (emotional intensity ratings, task performance, and self-report anxiety) and physiology from different modalities [brain connectivity and heart rate variability (HRV)]. Results replicated previous research and found that behavioral performance was modulated within-session based on varying levels of emotional intensity in the laboratory session (t (24) = 4.062, p < 0.0005) and stress level in the simulation session (Z = 2.45, corrected p-value = 0.0142). Both behavior and physiology demonstrated cross-session relationships. Behaviorally, higher intensity ratings in the laboratory was related to higher self-report anxiety in the immersive simulation during low-stress (r = 0.465, N = 25, p = 0.019) and high-stress (r = 0.400, N = 25, p = 0.047) conditions. Physiologically, brain connectivity in the theta band during the laboratory session significantly predicted low-frequency HRV in the simulation session (p < 0.05); furthermore, a frontoparietal connection accounted for emotional intensity ratings during the attend laboratory condition (r = 0.486, p = 0.011) and self-report anxiety after the high-stress simulation condition (r = 0.389, p = 0.035). Interestingly, the predictive power of the brain activity occurred only for the conditions where participants had higher levels of emotional reactivity, stress, or anxiety. Taken together, our findings describe an integrated behavioral and physiological characterization of emotional reactivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Roy
- United States Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Adelphi, MD, United States
| | - Nick Wasylyshyn
- United States Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Adelphi, MD, United States
| | - Derek P Spangler
- United States Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Adelphi, MD, United States
| | - Katherine R Gamble
- United States Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Adelphi, MD, United States
| | - Debbie Patton
- United States Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Adelphi, MD, United States
| | - Justin R Brooks
- United States Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Adelphi, MD, United States
| | - Javier O Garcia
- United States Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Adelphi, MD, United States.,Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Jean M Vettel
- United States Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Adelphi, MD, United States.,Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.,Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Wasylyshyn N, Hemenway Falk B, Garcia JO, Cascio CN, O'Donnell MB, Bingham CR, Simons-Morton B, Vettel JM, Falk EB. Global brain dynamics during social exclusion predict subsequent behavioral conformity. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2018. [PMID: 29529310 PMCID: PMC5827351 DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsy007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Individuals react differently to social experiences; for example, people who are more sensitive to negative social experiences, such as being excluded, may be more likely to adapt their behavior to fit in with others. We examined whether functional brain connectivity during social exclusion in the fMRI scanner can be used to predict subsequent conformity to peer norms. Adolescent males (n = 57) completed a two-part study on teen driving risk: a social exclusion task (Cyberball) during an fMRI session and a subsequent driving simulator session in which they drove alone and in the presence of a peer who expressed risk-averse or risk-accepting driving norms. We computed the difference in functional connectivity between social exclusion and social inclusion from each node in the brain to nodes in two brain networks, one previously associated with mentalizing (medial prefrontal cortex, temporoparietal junction, precuneus, temporal poles) and another with social pain (dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, anterior insula). Using predictive modeling, this measure of global connectivity during exclusion predicted the extent of conformity to peer pressure during driving in the subsequent experimental session. These findings extend our understanding of how global neural dynamics guide social behavior, revealing functional network activity that captures individual differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nick Wasylyshyn
- Human Research and Engineering Directorate, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005, USA.,Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Brett Hemenway Falk
- Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Javier O Garcia
- Human Research and Engineering Directorate, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005, USA.,Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Christopher N Cascio
- School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA
| | | | - C Raymond Bingham
- University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Bruce Simons-Morton
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute on Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Jean M Vettel
- Human Research and Engineering Directorate, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005, USA.,Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.,Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA
| | - Emily B Falk
- Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.,Marketing Department, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.,Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Cooper N, Garcia JO, Tompson SH, O’Donnell MB, Falk EB, Vettel JM. Time-evolving dynamics in brain networks forecast responses to health messaging. Netw Neurosci 2018; 3:138-156. [PMID: 30793078 PMCID: PMC6372021 DOI: 10.1162/netn_a_00058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2017] [Accepted: 05/09/2018] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Neuroimaging measures have been used to forecast complex behaviors, including how individuals change decisions about their health in response to persuasive communications, but have rarely incorporated metrics of brain network dynamics. How do functional dynamics within and between brain networks relate to the processes of persuasion and behavior change? To address this question, we scanned 45 adult smokers by using functional magnetic resonance imaging while they viewed anti-smoking images. Participants reported their smoking behavior and intentions to quit smoking before the scan and 1 month later. We focused on regions within four atlas-defined networks and examined whether they formed consistent network communities during this task (measured as allegiance). Smokers who showed reduced allegiance among regions within the default mode and fronto-parietal networks also demonstrated larger increases in their intentions to quit smoking 1 month later. We further examined dynamics of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), as activation in this region has been frequently related to behavior change. The degree to which vmPFC changed its community assignment over time (measured as flexibility) was positively associated with smoking reduction. These data highlight the value in considering brain network dynamics for understanding message effectiveness and social processes more broadly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Cooper
- Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Aberdeen, MD, USA
| | - Javier O. Garcia
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Aberdeen, MD, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Steven H. Tompson
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Aberdeen, MD, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Matthew B. O’Donnell
- Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Emily B. Falk
- Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jean M. Vettel
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Aberdeen, MD, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Waytowich N, Lawhern VJ, Garcia JO, Cummings J, Faller J, Sajda P, Vettel JM. Compact convolutional neural networks for classification of asynchronous steady-state visual evoked potentials. J Neural Eng 2018; 15:066031. [DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aae5d8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
24
|
Bansal K, Medaglia JD, Bassett DS, Vettel JM, Muldoon SF. Data-driven brain network models differentiate variability across language tasks. PLoS Comput Biol 2018; 14:e1006487. [PMID: 30332401 PMCID: PMC6192563 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2018] [Accepted: 09/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The relationship between brain structure and function has been probed using a variety of approaches, but how the underlying structural connectivity of the human brain drives behavior is far from understood. To investigate the effect of anatomical brain organization on human task performance, we use a data-driven computational modeling approach and explore the functional effects of naturally occurring structural differences in brain networks. We construct personalized brain network models by combining anatomical connectivity estimated from diffusion spectrum imaging of individual subjects with a nonlinear model of brain dynamics. By performing computational experiments in which we measure the excitability of the global brain network and spread of synchronization following a targeted computational stimulation, we quantify how individual variation in the underlying connectivity impacts both local and global brain dynamics. We further relate the computational results to individual variability in the subjects' performance of three language-demanding tasks both before and after transcranial magnetic stimulation to the left-inferior frontal gyrus. Our results show that task performance correlates with either local or global measures of functional activity, depending on the complexity of the task. By emphasizing differences in the underlying structural connectivity, our model serves as a powerful tool to assess individual differences in task performances, to dissociate the effect of targeted stimulation in tasks that differ in cognitive demand, and to pave the way for the development of personalized therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kanika Bansal
- Department of Mathematics, University at Buffalo – SUNY, Buffalo, New York, United States of America
- Human Research and Engineering Directorate, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, United States of America
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - John D. Medaglia
- Department of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Danielle S. Bassett
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Jean M. Vettel
- Human Research and Engineering Directorate, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, United States of America
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America
| | - Sarah F. Muldoon
- Department of Mathematics, University at Buffalo – SUNY, Buffalo, New York, United States of America
- Computational and Data-Enabled Science and Engineering Program, University at Buffalo – SUNY, Buffalo, New York, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Tompson SH, Kahn AE, Falk EB, Vettel JM, Bassett DS. Individual differences in learning social and nonsocial network structures. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2018; 45:253-271. [PMID: 30024255 DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
How do people acquire knowledge about which individuals belong to different cliques or communities? And to what extent does this learning process differ from the process of learning higher-order information about complex associations between nonsocial bits of information? Here, the authors use a paradigm in which the order of stimulus presentation forms temporal associations between the stimuli, collectively constituting a complex network. They examined individual differences in the ability to learn community structure of networks composed of social versus nonsocial stimuli. Although participants were able to learn community structure of both social and nonsocial networks, their performance in social network learning was uncorrelated with their performance in nonsocial network learning. In addition, social traits, including social orientation and perspective-taking, uniquely predicted the learning of social community structure but not the learning of nonsocial community structure. Taken together, the results suggest that the process of learning higher-order community structure in social networks is partially distinct from the process of learning higher-order community structure in nonsocial networks. The study design provides a promising approach to identify neurophysiological drivers of social network versus nonsocial network learning, extending knowledge about the impact of individual differences on these learning processes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
Collapse
|
26
|
Yeh FC, Panesar S, Fernandes D, Meola A, Yoshino M, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Vettel JM, Verstynen T. Population-averaged atlas of the macroscale human structural connectome and its network topology. Neuroimage 2018; 178:57-68. [PMID: 29758339 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 312] [Impact Index Per Article: 52.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2018] [Revised: 04/03/2018] [Accepted: 05/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
A comprehensive map of the structural connectome in the human brain has been a coveted resource for understanding macroscopic brain networks. Here we report an expert-vetted, population-averaged atlas of the structural connectome derived from diffusion MRI data (N = 842). This was achieved by creating a high-resolution template of diffusion patterns averaged across individual subjects and using tractography to generate 550,000 trajectories of representative white matter fascicles annotated by 80 anatomical labels. The trajectories were subsequently clustered and labeled by a team of experienced neuroanatomists in order to conform to prior neuroanatomical knowledge. A multi-level network topology was then described using whole-brain connectograms, with subdivisions of the association pathways showing small-worldness in intra-hemisphere connections, projection pathways showing hub structures at thalamus, putamen, and brainstem, and commissural pathways showing bridges connecting cerebral hemispheres to provide global efficiency. This atlas of the structural connectome provides representative organization of human brain white matter, complementary to traditional histologically-derived and voxel-based white matter atlases, allowing for better modeling and simulation of brain connectivity for future connectome studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fang-Cheng Yeh
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Sandip Panesar
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David Fernandes
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Antonio Meola
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Juan C Fernandez-Miranda
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jean M Vettel
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Aberdeen, MD, USA; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Timothy Verstynen
- Department of Psychology and Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, Pennsylvania, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Garcia JO, Ashourvan A, Muldoon SF, Vettel JM, Bassett DS. Applications of community detection techniques to brain graphs: Algorithmic considerations and implications for neural function. Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng 2018; 106:846-867. [PMID: 30559531 PMCID: PMC6294140 DOI: 10.1109/jproc.2017.2786710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
The human brain can be represented as a graph in which neural units such as cells or small volumes of tissue are heterogeneously connected to one another through structural or functional links. Brain graphs are parsimonious representations of neural systems that have begun to offer fundamental insights into healthy human cognition, as well as its alteration in disease. A critical open question in network neuroscience lies in how neural units cluster into densely interconnected groups that can provide the coordinated activity that is characteristic of perception, action, and adaptive behaviors. Tools that have proven particularly useful for addressing this question are community detection approaches, which can identify communities or modules: groups of neural units that are densely interconnected with other units in their own group but sparsely interconnected with units in other groups. In this paper, we describe a common community detection algorithm known as modularity maximization, and we detail its applications to brain graphs constructed from neuroimaging data. We pay particular attention to important algorithmic considerations, especially in recent extensions of these techniques to graphs that evolve in time. After recounting a few fundamental insights that these techniques have provided into brain function, we highlight potential avenues of methodological advancements for future studies seeking to better characterize the patterns of coordinated activity in the brain that accompany human behavior. This tutorial provides a naive reader with an introduction to theoretical considerations pertinent to the generation of brain graphs, an understanding of modularity maximization for community detection, a resource of statistical measures that can be used to characterize community structure, and an appreciation of the usefulness of these approaches in uncovering behaviorally-relevant network dynamics in neuroimaging data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier O Garcia
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005 USA
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
- Penn Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
- Department of Mathematics and CDSE Program, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
- Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106 USA
- Department of Electrical & Systems Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
| | - Arian Ashourvan
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005 USA
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
- Penn Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
- Department of Mathematics and CDSE Program, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
- Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106 USA
- Department of Electrical & Systems Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
| | - Sarah F Muldoon
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005 USA
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
- Penn Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
- Department of Mathematics and CDSE Program, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
- Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106 USA
- Department of Electrical & Systems Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
| | - Jean M Vettel
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005 USA
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
- Penn Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
- Department of Mathematics and CDSE Program, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
- Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106 USA
- Department of Electrical & Systems Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
| | - Danielle S Bassett
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005 USA
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
- Penn Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
- Department of Mathematics and CDSE Program, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
- Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106 USA
- Department of Electrical & Systems Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Vettel JM, Thurman SM, Wasylyshyn N, Roy H, Lieberman G, Asturias A, Okafor G, Elliot J, Giesbrecht B, Grafton ST, Garcia JO. 0191 Individual Differences In Sleep Log Compliance And Agreement With Wrist Actigraphy: A Longitudinal Study Of Naturalistic Sleep In Healthy Adults. Sleep 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsy061.190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- J M Vettel
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD
- University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - S M Thurman
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD
| | - N Wasylyshyn
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD
| | - H Roy
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD
| | - G Lieberman
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD
| | - A Asturias
- University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA
| | - G Okafor
- University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA
| | - J Elliot
- University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA
| | - B Giesbrecht
- University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA
| | - S T Grafton
- University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA
| | - J O Garcia
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Thurman SM, Wasylyshyn N, Garcia JO, Okafor G, Elliott JC, Giesbrecht B, Grafton ST, Flynn-Evans E, Vettel JM. 0207 Longitudinal Study of Psychomotor Vigilance Performance, Pupil Diameter, and Naturalistic Sleep History Across 16 Weeks. Sleep 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsy061.206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- S M Thurman
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD
| | - N Wasylyshyn
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD
| | - J O Garcia
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD
| | - G Okafor
- University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA
| | - J C Elliott
- University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA
| | - B Giesbrecht
- University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA
| | - S T Grafton
- University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA
| | | | - J M Vettel
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Cooper N, Tompson S, O’Donnell MB, Vettel JM, Bassett DS, Falk EB. Associations between coherent neural activity in the brain's value system during antismoking messages and reductions in smoking. Health Psychol 2018; 37:375-384. [PMID: 29446965 PMCID: PMC5880700 DOI: 10.1037/hea0000574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Worldwide, tobacco use is the leading cause of preventable death and illness. One common strategy for reducing the prevalence of cigarette smoking and other health risk behaviors is the use of graphic warning labels (GWLs). This has led to widespread interest from the perspective of health psychology in understanding the mechanisms of GWL effectiveness. Here we investigated differences in how the brain responds to negative, graphic warning label-inspired antismoking ads and neutral control ads, and we probed how this response related to future behavior. METHOD A group of smokers (N = 45) viewed GWL-inspired and control antismoking ads while undergoing fMRI, and their smoking behavior was assessed before and one month after the scan. We examined neural coherence between two regions in the brain's valuation network, the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) and ventral striatum (VS). RESULTS We found that greater neural coherence in the brain's valuation network during GWL ads (relative to control ads) preceded later smoking reduction. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that the integration of information about message value may be key for message influence. Understanding how the brain responds to health messaging and relates to future behavior could ultimately contribute to the design of effective messaging campaigns, as well as more broadly to theories of message effects and persuasion across domains. (PsycINFO Database Record
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Cooper
- Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA
| | - Steven Tompson
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Matthew B. O’Donnell
- Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jean M. Vettel
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| | - Danielle S. Bassett
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Electrical & Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Emily B. Falk
- Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Gamble KR, Vettel JM, Patton DJ, Eddy MD, Caroline Davis F, Garcia JO, Spangler DP, Thayer JF, Brooks JR. Different profiles of decision making and physiology under varying levels of stress in trained military personnel. Int J Psychophysiol 2018; 131:73-80. [PMID: 29580904 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2018] [Revised: 03/19/2018] [Accepted: 03/22/2018] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Decision making is one of the most vital processes we use every day, ranging from mundane decisions about what to eat to life-threatening choices such as how to avoid a car collision. Thus, the context in which our decisions are made is critical, and our physiology enables adaptive responses that account for how environmental stress influences our performance. The relationship between stress and decision making can additionally be affected by one's expertise in making decisions in high-threat environments, where experts can develop an adaptive response that mitigates the negative impacts of stress. In the present study, 26 male military personnel made friend/foe discriminations in an environment where we manipulated the level of stress. In the high-stress condition, participants received a shock when they incorrectly shot a friend or missed shooting a foe; in the low-stress condition, participants received a vibration for an incorrect decision. We characterized performance using signal detection theory to investigate whether a participant changed their decision criterion to avoid making an error. Results showed that under high-stress, participants made more false alarms, mistaking friends as foes, and this co-occurred with increased high frequency heart rate variability. Finally, we examined the relationship between decision making and physiology, and found that participants exhibited adaptive behavioral and physiological profiles under different stress levels. We interpret this adaptive profile as a marker of an expert's ingrained training that does not require top down control, suggesting a way that expert training in high-stress environments helps to buffer negative impacts of stress on performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine R Gamble
- US Army Research Laboratory, B459, Mulberry Point Road, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005, USA.
| | - Jean M Vettel
- US Army Research Laboratory, B459, Mulberry Point Road, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005, USA; University of California, Santa Barbara, 251, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA; University of Pennsylvania, 3620 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| | - Debra J Patton
- US Army Research Laboratory, B459, Mulberry Point Road, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005, USA.
| | - Marianna D Eddy
- US Army Natick Soldier Research, Development, and Engineering Center, 10 General Greene Avenue, Natick, MA 01760, USA; Center for Applied Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Tufts University, 200 Boston Ave, Medford, MA 02155, USA.
| | - F Caroline Davis
- US Army Natick Soldier Research, Development, and Engineering Center, 10 General Greene Avenue, Natick, MA 01760, USA; Center for Applied Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Tufts University, 200 Boston Ave, Medford, MA 02155, USA.
| | - Javier O Garcia
- US Army Research Laboratory, B459, Mulberry Point Road, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005, USA; University of Pennsylvania, 3620 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| | - Derek P Spangler
- US Army Research Laboratory, B459, Mulberry Point Road, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005, USA.
| | - Julian F Thayer
- Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, 1835 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
| | - Justin R Brooks
- US Army Research Laboratory, B459, Mulberry Point Road, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Powell MA, Garcia JO, Yeh FC, Vettel JM, Verstynen T. Local connectome phenotypes predict social, health, and cognitive factors. Netw Neurosci 2018; 2:86-105. [PMID: 29911679 PMCID: PMC5989992 DOI: 10.1162/netn_a_00031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2017] [Accepted: 10/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The unique architecture of the human connectome is defined initially by genetics and subsequently sculpted over time with experience. Thus, similarities in predisposition and experience that lead to similarities in social, biological, and cognitive attributes should also be reflected in the local architecture of white matter fascicles. Here we employ a method known as local connectome fingerprinting that uses diffusion MRI to measure the fiber-wise characteristics of macroscopic white matter pathways throughout the brain. This fingerprinting approach was applied to a large sample (N = 841) of subjects from the Human Connectome Project, revealing a reliable degree of between-subject correlation in the local connectome fingerprints, with a relatively complex, low-dimensional substructure. Using a cross-validated, high-dimensional regression analysis approach, we derived local connectome phenotype (LCP) maps that could reliably predict a subset of subject attributes measured, including demographic, health, and cognitive measures. These LCP maps were highly specific to the attribute being predicted but also sensitive to correlations between attributes. Collectively, these results indicate that the local architecture of white matter fascicles reflects a meaningful portion of the variability shared between subjects along several dimensions. The local connectome is the pattern of fiber systems (i.e., number of fibers, orientation, and size) within a voxel, and it reflects the proximal characteristics of white matter fascicles distributed throughout the brain. Here we show how variability in the local connectome is correlated in a principled way across individuals. This intersubject correlation is reliable enough that unique phenotype maps can be learned to predict between-subject variability in a range of social, health, and cognitive attributes. This work shows, for the first time, how the local connectome has both the sensitivity and the specificity to be used as a phenotypic marker for subject-specific attributes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Powell
- Department of Mathematical Sciences, United States Military Academy, West Point, NY, USA
| | - Javier O Garcia
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA.,Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Fang-Cheng Yeh
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jean M Vettel
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA.,Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| | - Timothy Verstynen
- Department of Psychology and Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Brooks JR, Passaro AD, Kerick SE, Garcia JO, Franaszczuk PJ, Vettel JM. Overlapping brain network and alpha power changes suggest visuospatial attention effects on driving performance. Behav Neurosci 2018; 132:23-33. [PMID: 29389145 DOI: 10.1037/bne0000224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
When humans perform prolonged, continuous tasks, their performance fluctuates. The etiology of these fluctuations is multifactorial, but they are influenced by changes in attention reflected in underlying neural dynamics. Previous work with electroencephalography has suggested that prestimulus alpha power is a neural signature of attention allocation with higher power portending relatively poorer performance. The functional mechanisms subserving these changes in alpha power and behavior are postulated to be the result of networked neural activity that permits flexibility in the allocation of attention. Here, we directly examine the similarity between prestimulus alpha connectivity and power in relation to performance fluctuations in a continuous driving task. Participants were asked to maintain their vehicle in the center of a simulated highway, and we evaluated their performance by randomly perturbing the vehicle and assessing their steering correction. We then used the 3 seconds of neural activity before the unexpected event to derive alpha functional connectivity in the first analysis and alpha power in the second analysis, and we employed linear regression to separately investigate their relationship to 3 metrics of driving performance (lane deviation, reaction time (RT), and heading error). We find that the locations involved in our network analysis also show the strongest modulation of alpha activity. Interestingly, the network pattern suggests a posterior to anterior directionality, consistent with bottom-up theories of attention, and these results may reflect a gain control model of attention in which ongoing attention is modulated through coordinated, network activity. (PsycINFO Database Record
Collapse
|
34
|
Sizemore AE, Giusti C, Kahn A, Vettel JM, Betzel RF, Bassett DS. Cliques and cavities in the human connectome. J Comput Neurosci 2018; 44:115-145. [PMID: 29143250 PMCID: PMC5769855 DOI: 10.1007/s10827-017-0672-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2017] [Revised: 09/30/2017] [Accepted: 10/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Encoding brain regions and their connections as a network of nodes and edges captures many of the possible paths along which information can be transmitted as humans process and perform complex behaviors. Because cognitive processes involve large, distributed networks of brain areas, principled examinations of multi-node routes within larger connection patterns can offer fundamental insights into the complexities of brain function. Here, we investigate both densely connected groups of nodes that could perform local computations as well as larger patterns of interactions that would allow for parallel processing. Finding such structures necessitates that we move from considering exclusively pairwise interactions to capturing higher order relations, concepts naturally expressed in the language of algebraic topology. These tools can be used to study mesoscale network structures that arise from the arrangement of densely connected substructures called cliques in otherwise sparsely connected brain networks. We detect cliques (all-to-all connected sets of brain regions) in the average structural connectomes of 8 healthy adults scanned in triplicate and discover the presence of more large cliques than expected in null networks constructed via wiring minimization, providing architecture through which brain network can perform rapid, local processing. We then locate topological cavities of different dimensions, around which information may flow in either diverging or converging patterns. These cavities exist consistently across subjects, differ from those observed in null model networks, and - importantly - link regions of early and late evolutionary origin in long loops, underscoring their unique role in controlling brain function. These results offer a first demonstration that techniques from algebraic topology offer a novel perspective on structural connectomics, highlighting loop-like paths as crucial features in the human brain's structural architecture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann E. Sizemore
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA USA
- Broad Institute, Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA USA
| | - Chad Giusti
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA USA
| | - Ari Kahn
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA USA
- Human Research & Engineering Directorate, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen, MD USA
| | - Jean M. Vettel
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA USA
- Human Research & Engineering Directorate, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen, MD USA
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA USA
| | - Richard F. Betzel
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA USA
| | - Danielle S. Bassett
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA USA
- Department of Electrical & Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Thurman SM, Wasylyshyn N, Roy H, Lieberman G, Garcia JO, Asturias A, Okafor GN, Elliott JC, Giesbrecht B, Grafton ST, Mednick SC, Vettel JM. Individual differences in compliance and agreement for sleep logs and wrist actigraphy: A longitudinal study of naturalistic sleep in healthy adults. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0191883. [PMID: 29377925 PMCID: PMC5788380 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2017] [Accepted: 01/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
There is extensive laboratory research studying the effects of acute sleep deprivation on biological and cognitive functions, yet much less is known about naturalistic patterns of sleep loss and the potential impact on daily or weekly functioning of an individual. Longitudinal studies are needed to advance our understanding of relationships between naturalistic sleep and fluctuations in human health and performance, but it is first necessary to understand the efficacy of current tools for long-term sleep monitoring. The present study used wrist actigraphy and sleep log diaries to obtain daily measurements of sleep from 30 healthy adults for up to 16 consecutive weeks. We used non-parametric Bland-Altman analysis and correlation coefficients to calculate agreement between subjectively and objectively measured variables including sleep onset time, sleep offset time, sleep onset latency, number of awakenings, the amount of wake time after sleep onset, and total sleep time. We also examined compliance data on the submission of daily sleep logs according to the experimental protocol. Overall, we found strong agreement for sleep onset and sleep offset times, but relatively poor agreement for variables related to wakefulness including sleep onset latency, awakenings, and wake after sleep onset. Compliance tended to decrease significantly over time according to a linear function, but there were substantial individual differences in overall compliance rates. There were also individual differences in agreement that could be explained, in part, by differences in compliance. Individuals who were consistently more compliant over time also tended to show the best agreement and lower scores on behavioral avoidance scale (BIS). Our results provide evidence for convergent validity in measuring sleep onset and sleep offset with wrist actigraphy and sleep logs, and we conclude by proposing an analysis method to mitigate the impact of non-compliance and measurement errors when the two methods provide discrepant estimates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven M. Thurman
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Human Research & Engineering Directorate, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Nick Wasylyshyn
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Human Research & Engineering Directorate, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Heather Roy
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Human Research & Engineering Directorate, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Gregory Lieberman
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Human Research & Engineering Directorate, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Javier O. Garcia
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Human Research & Engineering Directorate, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, United States of America
- University of Pennsylvania, Department of Bioengineering, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Alex Asturias
- University of California, Santa Barbara, Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America
| | - Gold N. Okafor
- University of California, Santa Barbara, Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America
| | - James C. Elliott
- University of California, Santa Barbara, Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America
| | - Barry Giesbrecht
- University of California, Santa Barbara, Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America
| | - Scott T. Grafton
- University of California, Santa Barbara, Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America
| | - Sara C. Mednick
- University of California, Irvine, Department of Cognitive Science, Irvine, California, United States of America
| | - Jean M. Vettel
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Human Research & Engineering Directorate, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, United States of America
- University of Pennsylvania, Department of Bioengineering, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- University of California, Santa Barbara, Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Kim JZ, Soffer JM, Kahn AE, Vettel JM, Pasqualetti F, Bassett DS. Role of Graph Architecture in Controlling Dynamical Networks with Applications to Neural Systems. Nat Phys 2017; 14:91-98. [PMID: 29422941 PMCID: PMC5798649 DOI: 10.1038/nphys4268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2017] [Accepted: 08/18/2017] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
Networked systems display complex patterns of interactions between components. In physical networks, these interactions often occur along structural connections that link components in a hard-wired connection topology, supporting a variety of system-wide dynamical behaviors such as synchronization. While descriptions of these behaviors are important, they are only a first step towards understanding and harnessing the relationship between network topology and system behavior. Here, we use linear network control theory to derive accurate closed-form expressions that relate the connectivity of a subset of structural connections (those linking driver nodes to non-driver nodes) to the minimum energy required to control networked systems. To illustrate the utility of the mathematics, we apply this approach to high-resolution connectomes recently reconstructed from Drosophila, mouse, and human brains. We use these principles to suggest an advantage of the human brain in supporting diverse network dynamics with small energetic costs while remaining robust to perturbations, and to perform clinically accessible targeted manipulation of the brain's control performance by removing single edges in the network. Generally, our results ground the expectation of a control system's behavior in its network architecture, and directly inspire new directions in network analysis and design via distributed control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Z Kim
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104
| | - Jonathan M Soffer
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104
| | - Ari E Kahn
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104 and U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen, MD 21001
| | - Jean M Vettel
- Human Research & Engineering Directorate, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen, MD 21001, Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104
| | - Fabio Pasqualetti
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, 92521
| | - Danielle S Bassett
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
Human behavior is supported by flexible neurophysiological processes that enable the fine‐scale manipulation of information across distributed neural circuits. Yet, approaches for understanding the dynamics of these circuit interactions have been limited. One promising avenue for quantifying and describing these dynamics lies in multilayer network models. Here, networks are composed of nodes (which represent brain regions) and time‐dependent edges (which represent statistical similarities in activity time series). We use this approach to examine functional connectivity measured by non‐invasive neuroimaging techniques. These multilayer network models facilitate the examination of changes in the pattern of statistical interactions between large‐scale brain regions that might facilitate behavior. In this study, we define and exercise two novel measures of network reconfiguration, and demonstrate their utility in neuroimaging data acquired as healthy adult human subjects learn a new motor skill. In particular, we identify putative functional modules in multilayer networks and characterize the degree to which nodes switch between modules. Next, we define cohesive switches, in which a set of nodes moves between modules together as a group, and we define disjoint switches, in which a single node moves between modules independently from other nodes. Together, these two concepts offer complementary yet distinct insights into the changes in functional connectivity that accompany motor learning. More generally, our work offers statistical tools that other researchers can use to better understand the reconfiguration patterns of functional connectivity over time. Hum Brain Mapp 38:4744–4759, 2017. © 2017 The Authors Human Brain Mapping Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qawi K Telesford
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104.,Human Research and Engineering Directorate, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen, Maryland, 21001
| | - Arian Ashourvan
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104.,Human Research and Engineering Directorate, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen, Maryland, 21001
| | - Nicholas F Wymbs
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, 21218
| | - Scott T Grafton
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, 93106
| | - Jean M Vettel
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104.,Human Research and Engineering Directorate, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen, Maryland, 21001.,Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, 93106
| | - Danielle S Bassett
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104.,Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ashourvan A, Gu S, Mattar MG, Vettel JM, Bassett DS. The energy landscape underpinning module dynamics in the human brain connectome. Neuroimage 2017; 157:364-380. [PMID: 28602945 PMCID: PMC5600845 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.05.067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2016] [Revised: 05/26/2017] [Accepted: 05/31/2017] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Human brain dynamics can be viewed through the lens of statistical mechanics, where neurophysiological activity evolves around and between local attractors representing mental states. Many physically-inspired models of these dynamics define brain states based on instantaneous measurements of regional activity. Yet, recent work in network neuroscience has provided evidence that the brain might also be well-characterized by time-varying states composed of locally coherent activity or functional modules. We study this network-based notion of brain state to understand how functional modules dynamically interact with one another to perform cognitive functions. We estimate the functional relationships between regions of interest (ROIs) by fitting a pair-wise maximum entropy model to each ROI's pattern of allegiance to functional modules. This process uses an information theoretic notion of energy (as opposed to a metabolic one) to produce an energy landscape in which local minima represent attractor states characterized by specific patterns of modular structure. The clustering of local minima highlights three classes of ROIs with similar patterns of allegiance to community states. Visual, attention, sensorimotor, and subcortical ROIs are well-characterized by a single functional community. The remaining ROIs affiliate with a putative executive control community or a putative default mode and salience community. We simulate the brain's dynamic transitions between these community states using a random walk process. We observe that simulated transition probabilities between basins are statistically consistent with empirically observed transitions in resting state fMRI data. These results offer a view of the brain as a dynamical system that transitions between basins of attraction characterized by coherent activity in groups of brain regions, and that the strength of these attractors depends on the ongoing cognitive computations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arian Ashourvan
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005, USA
| | - Shi Gu
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Applied Mathematics and Computational Science Graduate Program, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Marcelo G Mattar
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Jean M Vettel
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005, USA; Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA
| | - Danielle S Bassett
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Electrical & Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Boothe DL, Yu AB, Kudela P, Anderson WS, Vettel JM, Franaszczuk PJ. Impact of Neuronal Membrane Damage on the Local Field Potential in a Large-Scale Simulation of Cerebral Cortex. Front Neurol 2017. [PMID: 28638364 PMCID: PMC5461262 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Within multiscale brain dynamics, the structure–function relationship between cellular changes at a lower scale and coordinated oscillations at a higher scale is not well understood. This relationship may be particularly relevant for understanding functional impairments after a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) when current neuroimaging methods do not reveal morphological changes to the brain common in moderate to severe TBI such as diffuse axonal injury or gray matter lesions. Here, we created a physiology-based model of cerebral cortex using a publicly released modeling framework (GEneral NEural SImulation System) to explore the possibility that performance deficits characteristic of blast-induced mTBI may reflect dysfunctional, local network activity influenced by microscale neuronal damage at the cellular level. We operationalized microscale damage to neurons as the formation of pores on the neuronal membrane based on research using blast paradigms, and in our model, pores were simulated by a change in membrane conductance. We then tracked changes in simulated electrical activity. Our model contained 585 simulated neurons, comprised of 14 types of cortical and thalamic neurons each with its own compartmental morphology and electrophysiological properties. Comparing the functional activity of neurons before and after simulated damage, we found that simulated pores in the membrane reduced both action potential generation and local field potential (LFP) power in the 1–40 Hz range of the power spectrum. Furthermore, the location of damage modulated the strength of these effects: pore formation on simulated axons reduced LFP power more strongly than did pore formation on the soma and the dendrites. These results indicate that even small amounts of cellular damage can negatively impact functional activity of larger scale oscillations, and our findings suggest that multiscale modeling provides a promising avenue to elucidate these relationships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David L Boothe
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Aberdeen, MD, United States.,Altus Engineering, Churchville, MD, United States
| | - Alfred B Yu
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Aberdeen, MD, United States
| | - Pawel Kudela
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.,The Johns Hopkins Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - William S Anderson
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Jean M Vettel
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Aberdeen, MD, United States.,Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, United States.,Department of Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Piotr J Franaszczuk
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Aberdeen, MD, United States.,Department of Neurology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Garcia JO, Brooks J, Kerick S, Johnson T, Mullen TR, Vettel JM. Estimating direction in brain-behavior interactions: Proactive and reactive brain states in driving. Neuroimage 2017; 150:239-249. [PMID: 28238938 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2016] [Revised: 02/13/2017] [Accepted: 02/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Conventional neuroimaging analyses have ascribed function to particular brain regions, exploiting the power of the subtraction technique in fMRI and event-related potential analyses in EEG. Moving beyond this convention, many researchers have begun exploring network-based neurodynamics and coordination between brain regions as a function of behavioral parameters or environmental statistics; however, most approaches average evoked activity across the experimental session to study task-dependent networks. Here, we examined on-going oscillatory activity as measured with EEG and use a methodology to estimate directionality in brain-behavior interactions. After source reconstruction, activity within specific frequency bands (delta: 2-3Hz; theta: 4-7Hz; alpha: 8-12Hz; beta: 13-25Hz) in a priori regions of interest was linked to continuous behavioral measurements, and we used a predictive filtering scheme to estimate the asymmetry between brain-to-behavior and behavior-to-brain prediction using a variant of Granger causality. We applied this approach to a simulated driving task and examined directed relationships between brain activity and continuous driving performance (steering behavior or vehicle heading error). Our results indicated that two neuro-behavioral states may be explored with this methodology: a Proactive brain state that actively plans the response to the sensory information and is characterized by delta-beta activity, and a Reactive brain state that processes incoming information and reacts to environmental statistics primarily within the alpha band.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier O Garcia
- US Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, United States; Qusp Labs., San Diego, CA, United States; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
| | - Justin Brooks
- US Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, United States
| | - Scott Kerick
- US Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, United States
| | | | | | - Jean M Vettel
- US Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, United States; University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, United States; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Passaro AD, Vettel JM, McDaniel J, Lawhern V, Franaszczuk PJ, Gordon SM. A novel method linking neural connectivity to behavioral fluctuations: Behavior-regressed connectivity. J Neurosci Methods 2017; 279:60-71. [PMID: 28109833 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2016] [Revised: 01/12/2017] [Accepted: 01/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND During an experimental session, behavioral performance fluctuates, yet most neuroimaging analyses of functional connectivity derive a single connectivity pattern. These conventional connectivity approaches assume that since the underlying behavior of the task remains constant, the connectivity pattern is also constant. NEW METHOD We introduce a novel method, behavior-regressed connectivity (BRC), to directly examine behavioral fluctuations within an experimental session and capture their relationship to changes in functional connectivity. This method employs the weighted phase lag index (WPLI) applied to a window of trials with a weighting function. Using two datasets, the BRC results are compared to conventional connectivity results during two time windows: the one second before stimulus onset to identify predictive relationships, and the one second after onset to capture task-dependent relationships. RESULTS In both tasks, we replicate the expected results for the conventional connectivity analysis, and extend our understanding of the brain-behavior relationship using the BRC analysis, demonstrating subject-specific BRC maps that correspond to both positive and negative relationships with behavior. Comparison with Existing Method(s): Conventional connectivity analyses assume a consistent relationship between behaviors and functional connectivity, but the BRC method examines performance variability within an experimental session to understand dynamic connectivity and transient behavior. CONCLUSION The BRC approach examines connectivity as it covaries with behavior to complement the knowledge of underlying neural activity derived from conventional connectivity analyses. Within this framework, BRC may be implemented for the purpose of understanding performance variability both within and between participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antony D Passaro
- Human Research and Engineering Directorate, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005, USA.
| | - Jean M Vettel
- Human Research and Engineering Directorate, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005, USA; University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA; University of Pennsylvania, PA 19104, USA.
| | | | - Vernon Lawhern
- Human Research and Engineering Directorate, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005, USA.
| | - Piotr J Franaszczuk
- Human Research and Engineering Directorate, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005, USA; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Muraskin J, Sherwin J, Lieberman G, Garcia JO, Verstynen T, Vettel JM, Sajda P. Fusing multiple neuroimaging modalities to assess group differences in perception-action coupling. Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng 2017; 105:83-100. [PMID: 28713174 PMCID: PMC5509353 DOI: 10.1109/jproc.2016.2574702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
In the last few decades, non-invasive neuroimaging has revealed macro-scale brain dynamics that underlie perception, cognition and action. Advances in non-invasive neuroimaging target two capabilities; 1) increased spatial and temporal resolution of measured neural activity, and 2) innovative methodologies to extract brain-behavior relationships from evolving neuroimaging technology. We target the second. Our novel methodology integrated three neuroimaging methodologies and elucidated expertise-dependent differences in functional (fused EEG-fMRI) and structural (dMRI) brain networks for a perception-action coupling task. A set of baseball players and controls performed a Go/No-Go task designed to mimic the situation of hitting a baseball. In the functional analysis, our novel fusion methodology identifies 50ms windows with predictive EEG neural correlates of expertise and fuses these temporal windows with fMRI activity in a whole-brain 2mm voxel analysis, revealing time-localized correlations of expertise at a spatial scale of millimeters. The spatiotemporal cascade of brain activity reflecting expertise differences begins as early as 200ms after the pitch starts and lasting up to 700ms afterwards. Network differences are spatially localized to include motor and visual processing areas, providing evidence for differences in perception-action coupling between the groups. Furthermore, an analysis of structural connectivity revealed that the players have significantly more connections between cerebellar and left frontal/motor regions, and many of the functional activation differences between the groups are located within structurally defined network modules that differentiate expertise. In short, our novel method illustrates how multimodal neuroimaging can provide specific macro-scale insights into the functional and structural correlates of expertise development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan Muraskin
- Columbia University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jason Sherwin
- Columbia University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gregory Lieberman
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Human Research and Engineering Directorate, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA. He is also with University of Pennsylvania, Department of Bioengineering, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Javier O Garcia
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Human Research and Engineering Directorate, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA
| | - Timothy Verstynen
- Carnegie Mellon University, Department of Psychology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jean M Vettel
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Human Research and Engineering Directorate, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA. He is also with University of Pennsylvania, Department of Bioengineering, Philadelphia, PA, USA and also with University of California, Santa Barbara, Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| | - Paul Sajda
- Columbia University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
Human skill learning requires fine-scale coordination of distributed networks of brain regions linked by white matter tracts to allow for effective information transmission. Yet how individual differences in these anatomical pathways may impact individual differences in learning remains far from understood. Here, we test the hypothesis that individual differences in structural organization of networks supporting task performance predict individual differences in the rate at which humans learn a visuomotor skill. Over the course of 6 weeks, 20 healthy adult subjects practiced a discrete sequence production task, learning a sequence of finger movements based on discrete visual cues. We collected structural imaging data, and using deterministic tractography generated structural networks for each participant to identify streamlines connecting cortical and subcortical brain regions. We observed that increased white matter connectivity linking early visual regions was associated with a faster learning rate. Moreover, the strength of multiedge paths between motor and visual modules was also correlated with learning rate, supporting the potential role of extended sets of polysynaptic connections in successful skill acquisition. Our results demonstrate that estimates of anatomical connectivity from white matter microstructure can be used to predict future individual differences in the capacity to learn a new motor-visual skill, and that these predictions are supported both by direct connectivity in visual cortex and indirect connectivity between visual cortex and motor cortex.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ari E. Kahn
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Human Research and Engineering Directorate, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen, MD 21001, USA
| | - Marcelo G. Mattar
- Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Jean M. Vettel
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Human Research and Engineering Directorate, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen, MD 21001, USA
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA
| | - Nicholas F. Wymbs
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| | - Scott T. Grafton
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA
| | - Danielle S. Bassett
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Brooks JR, Garcia JO, Kerick SE, Vettel JM. Differential Functionality of Right and Left Parietal Activity in Controlling a Motor Vehicle. Front Syst Neurosci 2016; 10:106. [PMID: 28082875 PMCID: PMC5187452 DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2016.00106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2016] [Accepted: 12/12/2016] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Driving a motor vehicle is an inherently complex task that requires robust control to avoid catastrophic accidents. Drivers must maintain their vehicle in the middle of the travel lane to avoid high speed collisions with other traffic. Interestingly, while a vehicle’s lane deviation (LD) is critical, studies have demonstrated that heading error (HE) is one of the primary variables drivers use to determine a steering response, which directly controls the position of the vehicle in the lane. In this study, we examined how the brain represents the dichotomy between control/response parameters (heading, reaction time (RT), and steering wheel corrections) and task-critical parameters (LD). Specifically, we examined electroencephalography (EEG) alpha band power (8–13 Hz) from estimated sources in right and left parietal regions, and related this activity to four metrics of driving performance. Our results demonstrate differential task involvement between the two hemispheres: right parietal activity was most closely related to LD, whereas left parietal activity was most closely related to HE, RT and steering responses. Furthermore, HE, RT and steering wheel corrections increased over the duration of the experiment while LD did not. Collectively, our results suggest that the brain uses differential monitoring and control strategies in the right and left parietal regions to control a motor vehicle. Our results suggest that the regulation of this control changes over time while maintaining critical task performance. These results are interpreted in two complementary theoretical frameworks: the uncontrolled manifold and compensatory control theories. The central tenet of these frameworks permits performance variability in parameters (i.e., HE, RT and steering) so far as it does not interfere with critical task execution (i.e., LD). Our results extend the existing research by demonstrating potential neural substrates for this phenomenon which may serve as potential targets for brain-computer interfaces that predict poor driving performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin R Brooks
- Human Research and Engineering Directorate, US Army Research Laboratory Adelphi, MD, USA
| | - Javier O Garcia
- Human Research and Engineering Directorate, US Army Research Laboratory Adelphi, MD, USA
| | - Scott E Kerick
- Human Research and Engineering Directorate, US Army Research Laboratory Adelphi, MD, USA
| | - Jean M Vettel
- Human Research and Engineering Directorate, US Army Research LaboratoryAdelphi, MD, USA; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of CaliforniaSanta Barbara, CA, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Yeh FC, Vettel JM, Singh A, Poczos B, Grafton ST, Erickson KI, Tseng WYI, Verstynen TD. Quantifying Differences and Similarities in Whole-Brain White Matter Architecture Using Local Connectome Fingerprints. PLoS Comput Biol 2016; 12:e1005203. [PMID: 27846212 PMCID: PMC5112901 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2016] [Accepted: 10/14/2016] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Quantifying differences or similarities in connectomes has been a challenge due to the immense complexity of global brain networks. Here we introduce a noninvasive method that uses diffusion MRI to characterize whole-brain white matter architecture as a single local connectome fingerprint that allows for a direct comparison between structural connectomes. In four independently acquired data sets with repeated scans (total N = 213), we show that the local connectome fingerprint is highly specific to an individual, allowing for an accurate self-versus-others classification that achieved 100% accuracy across 17,398 identification tests. The estimated classification error was approximately one thousand times smaller than fingerprints derived from diffusivity-based measures or region-to-region connectivity patterns for repeat scans acquired within 3 months. The local connectome fingerprint also revealed neuroplasticity within an individual reflected as a decreasing trend in self-similarity across time, whereas this change was not observed in the diffusivity measures. Moreover, the local connectome fingerprint can be used as a phenotypic marker, revealing 12.51% similarity between monozygotic twins, 5.14% between dizygotic twins, and 4.51% between none-twin siblings, relative to differences between unrelated subjects. This novel approach opens a new door for probing the influence of pathological, genetic, social, or environmental factors on the unique configuration of the human connectome. The local organization of white matter architecture is highly unique to individuals, making it a tangible metric of connectomic differences. The variability in local white matter architecture is found to be partially determined by genetic factors, but largely plastic across time. This approach opens a new door for probing the influence of pathological, genetic, social, or environmental factors on the unique configuration of the human connectome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fang-Cheng Yeh
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- * E-mail: (TDV); (FCY)
| | - Jean M. Vettel
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Aberdeen, Maryland, United States of America
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America
- University of Pennsylvania, Department of Bioengineering, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Aarti Singh
- Department of Machine Learning, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Barnabas Poczos
- Department of Machine Learning, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Scott T. Grafton
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America
| | - Kirk I. Erickson
- Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania United States of America
| | - Wen-Yih I. Tseng
- Institute of Medical Device and Imaging and Molecular Imaging Center, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Timothy D. Verstynen
- Department of Psychology and Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- * E-mail: (TDV); (FCY)
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Muldoon SF, Pasqualetti F, Gu S, Cieslak M, Grafton ST, Vettel JM, Bassett DS. Stimulation-Based Control of Dynamic Brain Networks. PLoS Comput Biol 2016; 12:e1005076. [PMID: 27611328 PMCID: PMC5017638 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 154] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2016] [Accepted: 07/23/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The ability to modulate brain states using targeted stimulation is increasingly being employed to treat neurological disorders and to enhance human performance. Despite the growing interest in brain stimulation as a form of neuromodulation, much remains unknown about the network-level impact of these focal perturbations. To study the system wide impact of regional stimulation, we employ a data-driven computational model of nonlinear brain dynamics to systematically explore the effects of targeted stimulation. Validating predictions from network control theory, we uncover the relationship between regional controllability and the focal versus global impact of stimulation, and we relate these findings to differences in the underlying network architecture. Finally, by mapping brain regions to cognitive systems, we observe that the default mode system imparts large global change despite being highly constrained by structural connectivity. This work forms an important step towards the development of personalized stimulation protocols for medical treatment or performance enhancement. Brain stimulation is increasingly used in clinical settings to treat neurological disorders, but much remains unknown about how stimulation to a single brain region impacts large-scale, brain network activity. Using structural neuroimaging scans, we create computational models of brain dynamics for eight participants to explore how structure-function relationships constrain the effect of stimulation to a single region on the brain as a whole. Our results show that network control theory can be used to predict if the effects of stimulation remain focal or spread globally, and structural connectivity differentially constrains the effects of regional stimulation. Additionally, we study how stimulation of different cognitive systems spreads throughout the brain and find that stimulation of regions within the default mode network provide a mechanism to impart large change in overall brain dynamics through a densely connected structural network. By revealing how the stimulation of different brain regions and cognitive systems spreads differently through the brain, we provide a modeling framework to develop stimulation protocols to personalize medical treatments, enable performance enhancements, and facilitate cortical plasticity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Feldt Muldoon
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- US Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, United States of America
- Department of Mathematics and Computational and Data-Enabled Science and Engineering Program, University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, New York, United States of America
| | - Fabio Pasqualetti
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, California, United States of America
| | - Shi Gu
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- Applied Mathematics and Computational Science Graduate Program, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Matthew Cieslak
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America
| | - Scott T. Grafton
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America
| | - Jean M. Vettel
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- US Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, United States of America
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America
| | - Danielle S. Bassett
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Muraskin J, Dodhia S, Lieberman G, Garcia JO, Verstynen T, Vettel JM, Sherwin J, Sajda P. Brain dynamics of post-task resting state are influenced by expertise: Insights from baseball players. Hum Brain Mapp 2016; 37:4454-4471. [PMID: 27448098 PMCID: PMC5113676 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2016] [Revised: 07/07/2016] [Accepted: 07/08/2016] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Post‐task resting state dynamics can be viewed as a task‐driven state where behavioral performance is improved through endogenous, non‐explicit learning. Tasks that have intrinsic value for individuals are hypothesized to produce post‐task resting state dynamics that promote learning. We measured simultaneous fMRI/EEG and DTI in Division‐1 collegiate baseball players and compared to a group of controls, examining differences in both functional and structural connectivity. Participants performed a surrogate baseball pitch Go/No‐Go task before a resting state scan, and we compared post‐task resting state connectivity using a seed‐based analysis from the supplementary motor area (SMA), an area whose activity discriminated players and controls in our previous results using this task. Although both groups were equally trained on the task, the experts showed differential activity in their post‐task resting state consistent with motor learning. Specifically, we found (1) differences in bilateral SMA–L Insula functional connectivity between experts and controls that may reflect group differences in motor learning, (2) differences in BOLD‐alpha oscillation correlations between groups suggests variability in modulatory attention in the post‐task state, and (3) group differences between BOLD‐beta oscillations that may indicate cognitive processing of motor inhibition. Structural connectivity analysis identified group differences in portions of the functionally derived network, suggesting that functional differences may also partially arise from variability in the underlying white matter pathways. Generally, we find that brain dynamics in the post‐task resting state differ as a function of subject expertise and potentially result from differences in both functional and structural connectivity. Hum Brain Mapp 37:4454–4471, 2016. © 2016 The Authors Human Brain Mapping Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan Muraskin
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Sonam Dodhia
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Gregory Lieberman
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Human Research and Engineering Directorate, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Aberdeen, Maryland.,Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Javier O Garcia
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Human Research and Engineering Directorate, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Aberdeen, Maryland
| | - Timothy Verstynen
- Department of Psychology and Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jean M Vettel
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Human Research and Engineering Directorate, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Aberdeen, Maryland.,Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, California
| | - Jason Sherwin
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Paul Sajda
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Abstract
When old–new recognition judgments must be based on ambiguous memory evidence, a proper criterion for responding “old” can substantially improve accuracy, but participants are typically suboptimal in their placement of decision criteria. Various accounts of suboptimal criterion placement have been proposed. The most parsimonious, however, is that subjects simply over-rely on memory evidence – however faulty – as a basis for decisions. We tested this account with a novel recognition paradigm in which old–new discrimination was minimal and critical errors were avoided by adopting highly liberal or conservative biases. In Experiment 1, criterion shifts were necessary to adapt to changing target probabilities or, in a “security patrol” scenario, to avoid either letting dangerous people go free (misses) or harming innocent people (false alarms). Experiment 2 added a condition in which financial incentives drove criterion shifts. Critical errors were frequent, similar across sources of motivation, and only moderately reduced by feedback. In Experiment 3, critical errors were only modestly reduced in a version of the security patrol with no study phase. These findings indicate that participants use even transparently non-probative information as an alternative to heavy reliance on a decision rule, a strategy that precludes optimal criterion placement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Kantner
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen, MD USA ; University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA USA
| | - Jean M Vettel
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen, MD USA ; University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
David Hairston W, Whitaker KW, Ries AJ, Vettel JM, Cortney Bradford J, Kerick SE, McDowell K. Usability of four commercially-oriented EEG systems. J Neural Eng 2014; 11:046018. [PMID: 24980915 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/11/4/046018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG) holds promise as a neuroimaging technology that can be used to understand how the human brain functions in real-world, operational settings while individuals move freely in perceptually-rich environments. In recent years, several EEG systems have been developed that aim to increase the usability of the neuroimaging technology in real-world settings. Here, the usability of three wireless EEG systems from different companies are compared to a conventional wired EEG system, BioSemi's ActiveTwo, which serves as an established laboratory-grade 'gold standard' baseline. The wireless systems compared include Advanced Brain Monitoring's B-Alert X10, Emotiv Systems' EPOC and the 2009 version of QUASAR's Dry Sensor Interface 10-20. The design of each wireless system is discussed in relation to its impact on the system's usability as a potential real-world neuroimaging system. Evaluations are based on having participants complete a series of cognitive tasks while wearing each of the EEG acquisition systems. This report focuses on the system design, usability factors and participant comfort issues that arise during the experimental sessions. In particular, the EEG systems are assessed on five design elements: adaptability of the system for differing head sizes, subject comfort and preference, variance in scalp locations for the recording electrodes, stability of the electrical connection between the scalp and electrode, and timing integration between the EEG system, the stimulus presentation computer and other external events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W David Hairston
- US Army Research Laboratory, Human Research and Engineering Directorate, Translational Neuroscience Branch, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Nestor A, Vettel JM, Tarr MJ. Internal representations for face detection: an application of noise-based image classification to BOLD responses. Hum Brain Mapp 2012; 34:3101-15. [PMID: 22711230 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2011] [Revised: 04/22/2012] [Accepted: 04/23/2012] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
What basic visual structures underlie human face detection and how can we extract such structures directly from the amplitude of neural responses elicited by face processing? Here, we address these issues by investigating an extension of noise-based image classification to BOLD responses recorded in high-level visual areas. First, we assess the applicability of this classification method to such data and, second, we explore its results in connection with the neural processing of faces. To this end, we construct luminance templates from white noise fields based on the response of face-selective areas in the human ventral cortex. Using behaviorally and neurally-derived classification images, our results reveal a family of simple but robust image structures subserving face representation and detection. Thus, we confirm the role played by classical face selective regions in face detection and we help clarify the representational basis of this perceptual function. From a theory standpoint, our findings support the idea of simple but highly diagnostic neurally-coded features for face detection. At the same time, from a methodological perspective, our work demonstrates the ability of noise-based image classification in conjunction with fMRI to help uncover the structure of high-level perceptual representations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian Nestor
- Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | | |
Collapse
|