1
|
Beckmann MW, Stübs FA, Koch MC, Mallmann P, Dannecker C, Dietl A, Sevnina A, Mergel F, Lotz L, Hack CC, Ehret A, Gantert D, Martignoni F, Cieslik JP, Menke J, Ortmann O, Stromberger C, Oechsle K, Hornemann B, Mumm F, Grimm C, Sturdza A, Wight E, Loessl K, Golatta M, Hagen V, Dauelsberg T, Diel I, Münstedt K, Merz E, Vordermark D, Lindel K, Wittekind C, Küppers V, Lellé R, Neis K, Griesser H, Pöschel B, Steiner M, Freitag U, Gilster T, Schmittel A, Friedrich M, Haase H, Gebhardt M, Kiesel L, Reinhardt M, Kreißl M, Kloke M, Horn LC, Wiedemann R, Marnitz S, Letsch A, Zraik I, Mangold B, Möckel J, Alt C, Wimberger P, Hillemanns P, Paradies K, Mustea A, Denschlag D, Henscher U, Tholen R, Wesselmann S, Fehm T. Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Cervical Cancer. Guideline of the DGGG, DKG and DKH (S3-Level, AWMF Registry No. 032/033OL, May 2021) – Part 1 with Recommendations
on Epidemiology, Screening, Diagnostics and Therapy. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2022; 82:139-180. [DOI: 10.1055/a-1671-2158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/17/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Aim This update of the interdisciplinary S3 guideline on the Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Cervical Cancer (AWMF Registry No. 032/033OL) was published in March 2021. This
updated guideline was funded by German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe) as part of the German Guideline Program in Oncology. The guideline was coordinated by the German Society of
Gynecology and Obstetrics (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, DGGG) and the Working Group on Gynecological Oncology (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische
Onkologie, AGO) of the German Cancer Society (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, DKG).
Method The process of updating the S3 guideline dating from 2014 was based on an appraisal of the available evidence using the criteria of evidence-based medicine, adaptations of
existing evidence-based national and international guidelines or – if evidence was lacking – on a consensus of the specialists involved in compiling the update. After an initial review of
the current literature was carried out according to a prescribed algorithm, several areas were identified which, in contrast to the predecessor version from September 2014, required new
recommendations or statements which took account of more recently published literature and the appraisal of the new evidence.
Recommendations The short version of this guideline consists of recommendations and statements on the epidemiology, screening, diagnostic workup and therapy of patients with cervical
cancer. The most important new aspects included in this updated guideline include the newly published FIGO classification of 2018, the radical open surgery approach for cervical cancers up
to FIGO stage IB1, and use of the sentinel lymph node technique for tumors ≤ 2 cm. Other changes include the use of PET-CT, new options in radiotherapy (e.g., intensity-modulated
radiotherapy, image-guided adaptive brachytherapy), and drug therapies to treat recurrence or metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias W. Beckmann
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Frederik A. Stübs
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Martin C. Koch
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | | | | | - Anna Dietl
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anna Sevnina
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Franziska Mergel
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Laura Lotz
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carolin C. Hack
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anne Ehret
- Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Frauenklinik, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Daniel Gantert
- Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Frauenklinik, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | | | - Jan Menke
- SHG-Kliniken Völklingen, Klinik für Radiologie, Völklingen, Germany
| | - Olaf Ortmann
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher Tumorzentren, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Berlin, Germany
| | - Karin Oechsle
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, II. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Beate Hornemann
- Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Psychoonkologischer Dienst, Dresden, Germany
| | - Friederike Mumm
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik III und Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC München LMU), Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, München, Germany
| | - Christoph Grimm
- Abteilung für allgemeine Gynäkologie und gynäkologische Onkologie, Gynecologic Cancer Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Austria
| | - Alina Sturdza
- Universitätsklinikum AKH-Wien, Klinik für Radioonkologie, Wien, Austria
| | - Edward Wight
- Universitätsspital Basel, Frauenklinik, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Kristina Loessl
- Universitätsklinik Bern, Klinik für Radio-Onkologie, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michael Golatta
- Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Frauenklinik, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Volker Hagen
- St. Johannes Hospital Dortmund, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Timm Dauelsberg
- Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Klinik für Onkologische Rehabilitation, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Ingo Diel
- Praxisklinik am Rosengarten, Mannheim, Germany
| | | | - Eberhard Merz
- Zentrum für Ultraschalldiagnostik und Pränatalmedizin Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Dirk Vordermark
- Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Katja Lindel
- Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | | | | | - Ralph Lellé
- Universitätsklinikum Münster, Frauenklinik, Münster, Germany
| | - Klaus Neis
- Frauenärzte am Staden, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ludwig Kiesel
- Universitätsklinikum Münster, Frauenklinik, Münster, Germany
| | - Michael Reinhardt
- Pius Hospital Oldenburg, Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Michael Kreißl
- Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg, Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Marianne Kloke
- Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Klinik für Palliativmedizin, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Regina Wiedemann
- Fliedner Fachhochschule Düsseldorf, Pflegewissenschaft, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz
- Universitätsklinikum Köln, Klinik für Radioonkologie, Cyberknife- und Strahlentherapie, Köln, Germany
| | - Anne Letsch
- Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Kiel, Germany
| | - Isabella Zraik
- Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Klinik für Urologie, Essen, Germany
| | | | | | - Céline Alt
- Wolfgarten Radiologie Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technische Universität Dresden and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany
| | - Peter Hillemanns
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Frauenklinik, Hannover, Germany
| | - Kerstin Paradies
- Konferenz onkologischer Kranken- und Kinderkrankenpflege (KOK), Germany
| | | | | | - Ulla Henscher
- Deutscher Verband für Physiotherapie (ZVK) e. V., Germany
| | - Reina Tholen
- Deutscher Verband für Physiotherapie (ZVK) e. V., Germany
| | | | - Tanja Fehm
- Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Frauenklinik, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fehm T, Stübs FA, Koch MC, Mallmann P, Dannecker C, Dietl A, Sevnina A, Mergel F, Lotz L, Ehret A, Gantert D, Martignoni F, Cieslik JP, Menke J, Ortmann O, Stromberger C, Oechsle K, Hornemann B, Mumm F, Grimm C, Sturdza A, Wight E, Loessl K, Golatta M, Hagen V, Dauelsberg T, Diel I, Münstedt K, Merz E, Vordermark D, Lindel K, Wittekind C, Küppers V, Lellé R, Neis K, Griesser H, Pöschel B, Steiner M, Freitag U, Gilster T, Schmittel A, Friedrich M, Haase H, Gebhardt M, Kiesel L, Reinhardt M, Kreißl M, Kloke M, Horn LC, Wiedemann R, Marnitz S, Letsch A, Zraik I, Mangold B, Möckel J, Alt C, Wimberger P, Hillemanns P, Paradies K, Mustea A, Denschlag D, Henscher U, Tholen R, Wesselmann S, Beckmann MW. Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Cervical Cancer. Guideline of the DGGG, DKG and DKH (S3-Level, AWMF Registry No. 032/033OL, May 2021) – Part 2 with Recommendations
on Psycho-oncology, Rehabilitation, Follow-up, Recurrence, Palliative Therapy and Healthcare Facilities. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2022; 82:181-205. [DOI: 10.1055/a-1671-2446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/17/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Aim This is an update of the interdisciplinary S3-guideline on the Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Cervical Cancer (AWMF Registry No. 032/033OL), published in March 2021. The
work on the updated guideline was funded by German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe) as part of the German Guideline Program in Oncology. The guideline was coordinated by the German
Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, DGGG) and the Working Group on Gynecological Oncology (Arbeitsgemeinschaft
Gynäkologische Onkologie, AGO) of the German Cancer Society (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, DKG).
Method The process used to update the 2014 S3-guideline was based on an appraisal of the available evidence using the criteria of evidence-based medicine, adaptations of existing
evidence-based national and international guidelines or – if evidence was lacking – on the consensus of the specialists involved in compiling the update. After an initial review of the
current literature was carried out according to a prescribed algorithm, several areas were identified which, in contrast to the predecessor version from September 2014, required new
recommendations or statements which would take account of more recently published literature and the recent appraisal of new evidence.
Recommendations The short version of this guideline consists of recommendations and statements on palliative therapy and follow-up of patients with cervical cancer. The most
important aspects included in this updated guideline are the new FIGO classification published in 2018, the radical open surgery approach used to treat cervical cancer up to FIGO stage IB1,
and the use of the sentinel lymph node technique for tumors ≤ 2 cm. Other changes include the use of PET-CT, new options in radiotherapy (e.g., intensity-modulated radiotherapy, image-guided
adaptive brachytherapy), and drug therapies to treat recurrence or metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanja Fehm
- Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Frederik A. Stübs
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Martin C. Koch
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | | | | | - Anna Dietl
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anna Sevnina
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Franziska Mergel
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Laura Lotz
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anne Ehret
- Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Jan Menke
- SHG-Kliniken Völklingen, Klinik für Radiologie, Völklingen, Germany
| | - Olaf Ortmann
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher Tumorzentren, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Berlin, Germany
| | - Karin Oechsle
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, II. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Beate Hornemann
- Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Psychoonkologischer Dienst, Dresden, Germany
| | - Friederike Mumm
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik III und Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC München LMU), Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, München, Germany
| | - Christoph Grimm
- Abteilung für allgemeine Gynäkologie und gynäkologische Onkologie, Gynecologic Cancer Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Austria
| | - Alina Sturdza
- Universitätsklinikum AKH-Wien, Klinik für Radioonkologie, Wien, Austria
| | - Edward Wight
- Universitätsspital Basel, Frauenklinik, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Kristina Loessl
- Universitätsklinik Bern, Klinik für Radio-Onkologie, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michael Golatta
- Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Frauenklinik, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Volker Hagen
- St. Johannes Hospital Dortmund, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Timm Dauelsberg
- Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Klinik für Onkologische Rehabilitation, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Ingo Diel
- Praxisklinik am Rosengarten, Mannheim, Germany
| | | | - Eberhard Merz
- Zentrum für Ultraschalldiagnostik und Pränatalmedizin Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Dirk Vordermark
- Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Katja Lindel
- Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | | | | | - Ralph Lellé
- Universitätsklinikum Münster, Frauenklinik, Münster, Germany
| | - Klaus Neis
- Frauenärzte am Staden, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ludwig Kiesel
- Universitätsklinikum Münster, Frauenklinik, Münster, Germany
| | - Michael Reinhardt
- Pius Hospital Oldenburg, Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Michael Kreißl
- Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg, Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Marianne Kloke
- Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Klinik für Palliativmedizin, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Regina Wiedemann
- Fliedner Fachhochschule Düsseldorf, Pflegewissenschaft, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz
- Universitätsklinikum Köln, Klinik für Radioonkologie, Cyberknife- und Strahlentherapie, Köln, Germany
| | - Anne Letsch
- Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Kiel, Germany
| | - Isabella Zraik
- Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Klinik für Urologie, Essen, Germany
| | | | | | - Céline Alt
- Wolfgarten Radiologie Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technische Universität Dresden and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany
| | - Peter Hillemanns
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Frauenklinik, Hannover, Germany
| | - Kerstin Paradies
- Konferenz onkologischer Kranken- und Kinderkrankenpflege (KOK), Germany
| | | | | | - Ulla Henscher
- Hochtaunus Kliniken, Frauenklinik, Bad Homburg, Germany
| | - Reina Tholen
- Deutscher Verband für Physiotherapie (ZVK) e. V., Germany
| | | | - Matthias W. Beckmann
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Watrowski R, Jäger C, Möckel J, Kurz P, Schmidt D, Freudenberg N. Hysteroscopic treatment of uterine tumor resembling ovarian sex cord-like tumor (UTROSCT). Gynecol Endocrinol 2015; 31:856-9. [PMID: 26369991 DOI: 10.3109/09513590.2015.1080682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The decision to preserve the uterus in a young nulliparous woman with an extremely rare tumor is challenging. Uterine tumor resembling ovarian sex cord-like tumor (UTROSCT) belongs to the rarest uterine pathologies. A 22-year-old nulligravida with uterine bleeding underwent a hysteroscopic resection of an intrauterine mass presumed as grade-1 submucous myoma. According to the presence of sex cord-like differentiation and positivity for calretinin, CD99, estrogen receptor, vimentin, WT1 and Melan-A, the tumor was diagnosed as UTROSCT. After 28 months, without any adjuvant therapy, the patient is still free of recurrence. This is the youngest patient with UTROSCT reported so far, with the longest follow-up among all five cases treated via hysteroscopy. Although UTROSCT has been traditionally treated with hysterectomy (with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy), no established treatment protocol for UTROSCT exists. UTROSCT shows a low-malignant potential, but metastasizing and recurrent cases occur. In light of the probably less aggressive tumor biology and with respect to the patient's autonomy, a conservative, uterus preserving treatment appears to be justified in selected cases in which close follow-up can be guaranteed. Further case reports are needed to prove the safety of organ-preserving strategy in UTROSCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafal Watrowski
- a Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, St. Josefskrankenhaus , Teaching Hospital of the University of Freiburg , Freiburg , Germany
| | - Christoph Jäger
- a Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, St. Josefskrankenhaus , Teaching Hospital of the University of Freiburg , Freiburg , Germany
| | - Jochen Möckel
- b Laboratory for Cytodiagnostics , Freiburg , Germany
| | - Philipp Kurz
- c Department of Pathology , University Hospital Freiburg , Freiburg , Germany , and
| | - Dietmar Schmidt
- d Institute of Pathology, Center for Gynecopathology , Mannheim , Germany
| | - Nikolaus Freudenberg
- b Laboratory for Cytodiagnostics , Freiburg , Germany
- c Department of Pathology , University Hospital Freiburg , Freiburg , Germany , and
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Watrowski R, Lange A, Möckel J. Primary omental pregnancy with secondary implantation into posterior cul-de-sac: laparoscopic treatment using hemostatic matrix. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014; 22:501-3. [PMID: 24973638 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2014] [Revised: 06/11/2014] [Accepted: 06/17/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Primary omental pregnancy is a rare form of ectopic pregnancy. Only a few reported cases have been treated using laparoscopy. Hemostasis after trophoblast removal can be challenging. A 25-year-old primigravida in week 8 of pregnancy was admitted to our hospital with a diagnosis of missed abortion. An ultrasound scan showed an empty uterine cavity and a gestational sac with a 15-mm embryo dorsal to the uterus, indicative of an ectopic pregnancy. The preoperative serum concentration of human chorionic gonadotropin was 33 600 U/mL. Laparoscopy was performed, which revealed an omental pregnancy invading the peritoneum of the Douglas pouch. After laparoscopic removal of the ectopic pregnancy with partial omentectomy, diffuse bleeding from the crater between both sacrouterine ligaments was treated using the gelatin-thrombin matrix (FloSeal). The final histologic analysis confirmed the omentum as the primary site of the ectopic pregnancy (multiple chorionic villi and decidua within the omental fat). The postoperative period was uneventful. This case expands the classic Studdiford criteria. Secondary peritoneal ectopic pregnancy implantation can occur not only after tubal rupture or expulsion of tubal ectopic pregnancy but also after primary implantation at any other ectopic site. The laparoscopic approach to abdominal pregnancy is safe and feasible if there is sufficient intraoperative hemostasis. The hemostatic matrix facilitates quick and effective control of bleeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafał Watrowski
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, St. Josefskrankenhaus, Teaching Hospital of the University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Annabel Lange
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, St. Josefskrankenhaus, Teaching Hospital of the University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Jochen Möckel
- Institute of Pathology "Dr. Möckel & Dr. Schneider", Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Watrowski R, Möckel J, Venzke T, Jäger C, Bauknecht T. Anaplastic pelvic carcinoma secondary to low-grade endometrial carcinoma. Anticancer Res 2014; 34:239-242. [PMID: 24403469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low-grade endometrial carcinoma has an excellent prognosis. The risk of secondary cancer after endometrial carcinoma is moderately increased and is mostly related to the field of postoperative radiation (small intestine, colon, vagina, and urinary bladder). Anaplastic (undifferentiated) pelvic carcinoma (APC) is rare and probably under-reported. To date, only one publication has reported six cases of APC that were secondary to low-grade endometrial carcinoma. CASE REPORT We have analyzed the fulminant course of APC-preceded by paraneoplastic arthritis-four months after hysterectomy and adnexectomy for low-grade endometrial carcinoma (endometrioid type, moderately differentiated, tumor diameter: 2 cm, infiltration depth 3 of 15 mm). The 73-year-old patient died five weeks after the diagnosis of the second malignancy. CONCLUSION The prognosis of APC is poor and the limitations of the therapy result from aggressive tumor biology and rapid deterioration of the patients' general condition. Rheumatological symptoms can precede cancer diagnosis. Immunohistochemistry facilitates the differentiation between primary and secondary carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafal Watrowski
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, St. Josefskrankenhaus, Teaching Hospital of the University of Freiburg, Sautierstr.1, 79104 Freiburg, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Möckel J, Quaas J, Meisel H, Endres AS, Schneider V. Human papillomavirus E6/E7 mRNA testing has higher specificity than liquid-based DNA testing in the evaluation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 2011; 33:311-315. [PMID: 22590808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the specificity of human papillomavirus (HPV) E6/E7 mRNA testing for intraepithelial precursor lesions and invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix in 358 women and compare the results with those of the most widely used DNA technique. STUDY DESIGN For HPV E6/E7 mRNA testing an amplification assay was used. For DNA determination a hybridization assay was applied. Both techniques were used simultaneously in patients with normal morphology (150), cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (173) and invasive carcinoma of the cervix (35). RESULTS HPV DNA positivity rates were significantly higher than E6/E7 mRNA in women with normal morphology (21-7%), cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1 and 2 (75-43%), and CIN 3 (93-63%). In invasive cervical carcinoma, both methods tested equally high (94% vs. 97%). Considering that E6/E7 up-regulation represents the initial step in cervical carcinogenesis, it can be assumed that this test allows a more specific detection of lesions with a potential for progression. CONCLUSION HPV E6/E7 mRNA may serve as a more specific discriminator between transient cervical dysplasias and potentially progressive lesions. Accordingly, testing for high-risk HPV E6/E7 mRNA might reduce the psychologic burden associated with HPV-DNA testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jochen Möckel
- Institute of Pathology, University of Witten/Herdecke, Wuppertal, Germany
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Möckel J, Jakubiczka S, Reuss C, Keck C, Breckwoldt M. Acute Abdomen in a Patient with Undiagnosed Complete Androgen Insensitivity - Akutes Abdomen bei einem Patienten mit nicht diagnostizierter vollständiger Androgen-Insensibilität -. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2000. [DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-8818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/16/2022] Open
|
8
|
Affiliation(s)
- E Walter
- Medizinische Universitätsklinik, Freiburg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|